readiness differentiation - kristina j. doubet ph.d · 2 kinds of readiness differentiation low...

41
Readiness Differentiation KRISTINA J. DOUBET, PH.D. – JAMES MADISON UNIVERSITY – [email protected] SUTHERLAND MIDDLE SCHOOL– 01/17/2020

Upload: others

Post on 17-Jun-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Readiness Differentiation - Kristina J. Doubet Ph.D · 2 Kinds of Readiness Differentiation LOW PREP •Proactively providing “ramps” into the learning based on observed “broad”

Readiness DifferentiationKRISTINA J. DOUBET, PH.D. – JAMES MADISON UNIVERSITY – [email protected]

SUTHERLAND MIDDLE SCHOOL– 01/17/2020

Page 2: Readiness Differentiation - Kristina J. Doubet Ph.D · 2 Kinds of Readiness Differentiation LOW PREP •Proactively providing “ramps” into the learning based on observed “broad”

AgendaLow-Prep Scaffolding Strategies

Formative Assessment Analysis

Using Grouping to Address Readiness Needs

Page 3: Readiness Differentiation - Kristina J. Doubet Ph.D · 2 Kinds of Readiness Differentiation LOW PREP •Proactively providing “ramps” into the learning based on observed “broad”

Differentiating for Student Readiness

Page 4: Readiness Differentiation - Kristina J. Doubet Ph.D · 2 Kinds of Readiness Differentiation LOW PREP •Proactively providing “ramps” into the learning based on observed “broad”

© 2016 by Doubet & Hockett

Readiness vs. Ability

• Readiness

Ø“Where” a student is in his or her grasp of learning goals at a certain point in time.

ØVaries from lesson to lesson and skill to skill

ØBest gauged by recently-gatheredevidence that is relevant to the learning goals

• AbilityØA proclamation about a

student’s overall capacity as a learner or human being

ØOften treated static or fixed across subjects, skills, or time

ØUsually inferred from standardized test scores

ØInvolves or implies comparisons to other students

Page 5: Readiness Differentiation - Kristina J. Doubet Ph.D · 2 Kinds of Readiness Differentiation LOW PREP •Proactively providing “ramps” into the learning based on observed “broad”

2 Kinds of Readiness Differentiation

LOW PREP

• Proactively providing

“ramps” into the learning

based on observed “broad”

needs of your students

(e.g., language, reading,

attention)

• AKA – UDL

HIGH PREP

• Collecting Formative

Assessment aligned to

specific learning goals,

analyzing the data for

patterns, and responding to

those patterns with

tasks, prompts, etc.

• AKA - Tiering

Page 6: Readiness Differentiation - Kristina J. Doubet Ph.D · 2 Kinds of Readiness Differentiation LOW PREP •Proactively providing “ramps” into the learning based on observed “broad”

Low Prep

Universal Design for Learning

Page 7: Readiness Differentiation - Kristina J. Doubet Ph.D · 2 Kinds of Readiness Differentiation LOW PREP •Proactively providing “ramps” into the learning based on observed “broad”

Simple StrategiesØTurn to a partnerØLogographic CuesØFormatting ØPre-writing (written or recorded)ØSentence stemsØPairing verbal and written directionsØRecorded “tutorials” for common issues

Which have you tried?

Page 8: Readiness Differentiation - Kristina J. Doubet Ph.D · 2 Kinds of Readiness Differentiation LOW PREP •Proactively providing “ramps” into the learning based on observed “broad”

Highlighted TextsAbout 15% of a chapter – e.g.,

IntroductionConclusionCritical passagesKey graphics

Intended for English language learnersAlso helpful for students:

With ADHDWith learning DisabilitiesWho have difficulty making meaningWho struggle with reading

Tomlinson, 2008

Page 9: Readiness Differentiation - Kristina J. Doubet Ph.D · 2 Kinds of Readiness Differentiation LOW PREP •Proactively providing “ramps” into the learning based on observed “broad”

Use RecordingsüOf your directions

üOf student thinking…• ...during group work

• ...before writing or solving

(individuals)

Page 10: Readiness Differentiation - Kristina J. Doubet Ph.D · 2 Kinds of Readiness Differentiation LOW PREP •Proactively providing “ramps” into the learning based on observed “broad”

Differentiated Texts

From Carbaugh, E.M. & Doubet, K.J. (2016). The differentiated flipped classroom: A practical guide to digital learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Page 11: Readiness Differentiation - Kristina J. Doubet Ph.D · 2 Kinds of Readiness Differentiation LOW PREP •Proactively providing “ramps” into the learning based on observed “broad”

Name: ___________________ Text: ___________________________

AS YOU READ… AFTER YOU READ…

•Important words:

•Main ideas:

•Puzzling passages:

•Powerful passages:

•Meaning of important words:

•Why ideas are important:

•Questions about passages:

•Reactions/why powerful:

Page 12: Readiness Differentiation - Kristina J. Doubet Ph.D · 2 Kinds of Readiness Differentiation LOW PREP •Proactively providing “ramps” into the learning based on observed “broad”

Name: _______________________ Text: ___________________________

AS YOU READ… AFTER YOU READ…

•Important words:•Communicable (p.56): you can “catch” it from someone else•Non-communicable (p.56): you can NOT “catch” it from someone else•Invincible (p. 58): No one can stop you!•Immortal (p.60): You cannot die OR you will always be remembered

•Main ideas (physical risks, psychological risks, decision-making)

•Puzzling passages:

•Powerful passages:

•Hints to Remember Meaning of important words:

•Why ideas are important (Find the parts of the text highlighted in green)

•Questions about passages:

•Reactions/why powerful:

Page 13: Readiness Differentiation - Kristina J. Doubet Ph.D · 2 Kinds of Readiness Differentiation LOW PREP •Proactively providing “ramps” into the learning based on observed “broad”

Name: ___________________ Text: ___________________________

AS YOU READ… AFTER YOU READ…

•Key Vocabulary/ Passages:

•Debatable passages:

•Overarching Ideas/Patterns:

•Why ideas are important:

•Points of Contention:

•Importance of Patterns:

AS or AFTER…

•Respond to this passage in the voice and perspective of ________________:

Page 14: Readiness Differentiation - Kristina J. Doubet Ph.D · 2 Kinds of Readiness Differentiation LOW PREP •Proactively providing “ramps” into the learning based on observed “broad”

Outline –Traditional

I. Main Idea: ________________________A. Sub Idea: ___________________________

1. Supporting Detail: _____________________2. Supporting Detail: ______________________3. Supporting Detail: _______________________

B. Sub Idea : ________________________1. Supporting Detail : ________________________2. Supporting Detail : ________________________3. Supporting Detail : ________________________

II. Main Idea : ________________________A. Sub Idea : ________________________

1. Supporting Detail : ________________________2. Supporting Detail : ________________________3. Supporting Detail : ________________________

B. Sub Idea : ________________________1. Supporting Detail : ________________________2. Supporting Detail : ________________________3. Supporting Detail : ________________________

Page 15: Readiness Differentiation - Kristina J. Doubet Ph.D · 2 Kinds of Readiness Differentiation LOW PREP •Proactively providing “ramps” into the learning based on observed “broad”

Outline – ScaffoldedI. Main Idea: ________________________

A. Supporting Detail : ________________________B. Supporting Detail : ________________________C. Supporting Detail : ________________________

D. Supporting Detail : ________________________

II. Main Idea : ________________________A. Supporting Detail : ________________________B. Supporting Detail : ________________________

C. Supporting Detail : ________________________D. Supporting Detail : ________________________

Now, number

your details in the order you want to

discuss them.

Page 16: Readiness Differentiation - Kristina J. Doubet Ph.D · 2 Kinds of Readiness Differentiation LOW PREP •Proactively providing “ramps” into the learning based on observed “broad”

Helpful Tool: Rewordify.com

Page 17: Readiness Differentiation - Kristina J. Doubet Ph.D · 2 Kinds of Readiness Differentiation LOW PREP •Proactively providing “ramps” into the learning based on observed “broad”

Higher-Prep

Creating Tiered Tasks

Book: pp. 194-201

Page 18: Readiness Differentiation - Kristina J. Doubet Ph.D · 2 Kinds of Readiness Differentiation LOW PREP •Proactively providing “ramps” into the learning based on observed “broad”

Ongoing Classroom Assessment

Doubet & Hockett © 2018

Fuel for effective teaching & learning

Page 19: Readiness Differentiation - Kristina J. Doubet Ph.D · 2 Kinds of Readiness Differentiation LOW PREP •Proactively providing “ramps” into the learning based on observed “broad”

Learning Objectives• Students will UNDERSTAND THAT…

• Metaphors and similes allow us to communicate meaning in ways that normal language cannot.

• Metaphors and similes communicate ideas by making sensory connections.

• Students will KNOW…• Definitions of metaphor, simile, figurative language, imagery, stanza,

couplet, free verse

• Students will BE ABLE TO…• Use metaphors and similes to convey descriptions• Write in a given stanza format

Doubet & Hockett © 2018

Page 20: Readiness Differentiation - Kristina J. Doubet Ph.D · 2 Kinds of Readiness Differentiation LOW PREP •Proactively providing “ramps” into the learning based on observed “broad”

Formative Assessment

(given previous class)

Name: _____________________________ Period:________

1. What is a “metaphor”?

2. Give at least two examples.

3. Explain why song-writers and poets use metaphors.

Doubet & Hockett © 2018

Page 21: Readiness Differentiation - Kristina J. Doubet Ph.D · 2 Kinds of Readiness Differentiation LOW PREP •Proactively providing “ramps” into the learning based on observed “broad”

Formative Assessment Analysis• Examine the assessment results and try to find patterns

among the assessment results.• Determine if there is something EVERYONE needs. This will

be your review, warm up, or mini-lesson• Next, form groups according to the DIFFERENT patterns you

discern. • For your own clarity, define the group in some way

(distinguishing misconceptions or insights, what they need next, etc.)

• For your own clarity, identify some representative responses for each group

Page 22: Readiness Differentiation - Kristina J. Doubet Ph.D · 2 Kinds of Readiness Differentiation LOW PREP •Proactively providing “ramps” into the learning based on observed “broad”

Warm Up Journal PromptAll Students write in response to the following

prompt:“Describe yourself in such a way that someone who had never met you would feel as though they knew you really well after they read your

description.”Doubet & Hockett © 2018

They need a place to start that’s 1) close to home, 2) motivating 3) will

supply a LOT of description.

Page 23: Readiness Differentiation - Kristina J. Doubet Ph.D · 2 Kinds of Readiness Differentiation LOW PREP •Proactively providing “ramps” into the learning based on observed “broad”

Paberns in Readiness• I found that the first question (the recall question) was the least helpful in

determining who “got it.” In fact, it was a red herring in many cases, as many students who knew the definition were not able to create a metaphor or explain why anyone would use it – the ultimate goal for my students. The opposite was also true (some could explain but not define).

• I therefore focused on the second and third questions; the following patterns emerged:

• Understood metaphor enough to give an insightful example and explain its purpose

• Struggled with why and how to use metaphors

Page 24: Readiness Differentiation - Kristina J. Doubet Ph.D · 2 Kinds of Readiness Differentiation LOW PREP •Proactively providing “ramps” into the learning based on observed “broad”

PatternsGave Strong Examples and Explained

the Importance of Metaphor

• These students’ examples were nuanced (e.g., “My favorite song is a jolt of lightening in my veins”) and their explanations were insightful (e.g., “[Songwriters] use them to paint pictures in your mind.”)

Gave weak examples and explanation of the Importance of Metaphor

• These students’ attempts at using metaphors were either missing, incorrect (e.g., “My moves are smooth”), or incomplete (e.g., “I am a tree”). They need models of what metaphors look like and to be prompted to make comparisons rather than just giving descriptions.

Page 25: Readiness Differentiation - Kristina J. Doubet Ph.D · 2 Kinds of Readiness Differentiation LOW PREP •Proactively providing “ramps” into the learning based on observed “broad”

Formative Assessment Analysis• Figure out what feedback and practice/extension each group

would need to• ...address their misconceptions• ...help them move to the next level of sophistication with the

content• Keep in mind that good feedback

• Provides both glow and grow information• Provides actionable steps• Is accessible to students independently• Is targeted and specific• Is assessable (a way for you to evaluate the result)

Page 26: Readiness Differentiation - Kristina J. Doubet Ph.D · 2 Kinds of Readiness Differentiation LOW PREP •Proactively providing “ramps” into the learning based on observed “broad”

Feedback NeededGave Strong Examples and Explained the

importance of Metaphor

• These students need to be pushed to use metaphors in a more sophisticated manner.

• Since they are already able to capture isolated snapshots of description via metaphor., they need to be pushed to create extended comparisons…. through a conceit.

Gave weak examples and explanation of the Importance of Metaphor

• They need models of what metaphors look like and to be prompted to make comparisons rather than just giving descriptions.

• Since they need models that are relevant, I will lead a group exercise in which students generate their own metaphors out of simple descriptions (e.g., for ”My moves are smooth,” ask the student what he can think of that’s smooth and compare his moves to that). Write these student-generated examples on board.

Page 27: Readiness Differentiation - Kristina J. Doubet Ph.D · 2 Kinds of Readiness Differentiation LOW PREP •Proactively providing “ramps” into the learning based on observed “broad”

Tiered Tasks (Differentiated by Readiness)Gave Strong Examples and Explained the

Importance of Metaphor

1. Read your journal entry and circle the descriptions of yourself that you believe are the most important.

2. Choose something to compare yourself to that captures all of these aspects of your personality. It can be something abstract, something in nature, a machine of sorts, a song, a force, a color—the only thing it CAN’T be is another person.

3. Write a poem comparing yourself to what you chose in step 2 – without using “like or ““as”. Strive for at least 4 stanzas (line lengths in stanzas can vary). Let us see the real you.

• Gave weak examples and explanation of the Importance of metaphor

1. Read your journal entry and circle the descriptions of yourself that you believe are the most important.

2. Meet with teacher for a “group huddle” (e.g., for ”My moves are smooth,” ask the student what he can think of that’s smooth and compare his moves to that). Write these student-generated examples on board. Now think of things that are like each of those aspects of your personality. These things can be abstract, from nature, electronics, colors, etc. —the only thing they CAN’T be are people.

3. Write a poem made up of couplets – one couplet comparing yourself to each thing you chose in step 2 – without using “like or ““as”. Strive for at least 6 comparisons. Let us see the real you.

Page 28: Readiness Differentiation - Kristina J. Doubet Ph.D · 2 Kinds of Readiness Differentiation LOW PREP •Proactively providing “ramps” into the learning based on observed “broad”

I am a powder kegMy anger builds until someone makes it

explode.I am an eraser –

Eliminating all the bad thoughts from my mind.

I am a puppy –Loyal and friendly to those I love

I am an ant –Everyone looks down on me.

I am nothing –No one can see me.

But I am something –Brilliant and intelligent.

Who am I?Powder keg, eraser, puppy, ant, nothing,

and something.I am Me.

~April ~ 7th Grade

I am Love –I am cherished.

I am looked for often,But seldom found…

I am Love –sometimes sweet,

But always with the potentialTo bite you in the back…

I am Love –Oh-so-precious,

But you’d better believe you can seeThe ugly side of me…

I am Love –A big heart full of joy,A calm, quiet day with a big storm brewing,

A bird soaring higher and higherInto that dangerous sky.

~Jasmine~ 7th Grade

The Results

Page 29: Readiness Differentiation - Kristina J. Doubet Ph.D · 2 Kinds of Readiness Differentiation LOW PREP •Proactively providing “ramps” into the learning based on observed “broad”

Your Turn• Use the Protocol (p. 209-210) and Template (p.211)

to analyze your formative assessment results and decide on potential “next steps” for instruction.

• Remember – your goal is to find patterns in your assessment results and to design tasks that provide the proper feedback to students to help them grow.

• Start with the Top Task first!!!!!

Page 30: Readiness Differentiation - Kristina J. Doubet Ph.D · 2 Kinds of Readiness Differentiation LOW PREP •Proactively providing “ramps” into the learning based on observed “broad”

Doubet & Hockes © 2018

Tiered Prompts Examination• Choose a set of Tiered Prompts to Review. Examine:

• How are the tasks SIMILAR? What’s the “glue” that holds them together? Use these sentence frames:Ø“Both tasks ask students to…”Ø“Both are focused on…”

• How are the tasks DIFFERENT? Use these sentence frames:Ø“This one is more __________, and this one is more ________.”Ø “This one requires students to ___, and this one requires them to_.”

Page 31: Readiness Differentiation - Kristina J. Doubet Ph.D · 2 Kinds of Readiness Differentiation LOW PREP •Proactively providing “ramps” into the learning based on observed “broad”

“Contracts” or “Agendas”• ”Delivery Systems” for

Differentiation• Ideal for when you don’t see

patterns in formative assessment, but you do have a few studentswho nee something different• See book pages 202-205

Page 32: Readiness Differentiation - Kristina J. Doubet Ph.D · 2 Kinds of Readiness Differentiation LOW PREP •Proactively providing “ramps” into the learning based on observed “broad”

Let’s see 5 Teachers in Action Working with Small Groups to address Readiness Needs

Consider…

• … what about this structure might work for my students?

• … what might I need to change to make it work for my students?

• … what are the pros and cons of this technique (for students and for you)?

Page 33: Readiness Differentiation - Kristina J. Doubet Ph.D · 2 Kinds of Readiness Differentiation LOW PREP •Proactively providing “ramps” into the learning based on observed “broad”

Think about what you’d

Steal, Change, or

Discard.

1. One Small Group: https://www.teachingchannel.org/video/analyzing-text-writing

2. Opt-In Groups (One Group): https://www.teachingchannel.org/video/guided-groups-formative-assessment

3. Tiered Tasks (Two Groups)

4. Stations (Several Groups)

5. Mulitple Groups in PBL: https://www.teachingchannel.org/video/workshop-model-customized-learning!

Page 34: Readiness Differentiation - Kristina J. Doubet Ph.D · 2 Kinds of Readiness Differentiation LOW PREP •Proactively providing “ramps” into the learning based on observed “broad”

“Contracts” or “Agendas”• ”Delivery Systems” for

Differentiation• Ideal for when you don’t see

patterns in formative assessment, but you do have a few studentswho nee something different• See book pages 202-205

Page 35: Readiness Differentiation - Kristina J. Doubet Ph.D · 2 Kinds of Readiness Differentiation LOW PREP •Proactively providing “ramps” into the learning based on observed “broad”

Forma&ve Assessment Pa/erns

Got It(able to distinguish

between ethos, pathos, and logos)

Didn’t Get It (unable to distinguish

between ethos, pathos, and logos)

Doubet & Hockett © 2018

Page 36: Readiness Differentiation - Kristina J. Doubet Ph.D · 2 Kinds of Readiness Differentiation LOW PREP •Proactively providing “ramps” into the learning based on observed “broad”

Tiered Rhetoric TasksEveryone: Review the Relationship Between Argument and Persuasion

• For students who were able to distinguish between ethos, pathos,

and logos in a text: Watch a video and examine it for ethos, pathos, and logos.

How do those elements reveal and contribute to author’s

purpose?

• For students who were NOT able to distinguish between ethos, pathos,

logos in a text:

• Examine a series of visual ads. Evaluate each adfor its use of

ethos, pathos, and logos. • What impact do these elements

have on the “reader”?

Based on tasks by Shannon Roos and Erin Marron, Hampton High School

Page 37: Readiness Differentiation - Kristina J. Doubet Ph.D · 2 Kinds of Readiness Differentiation LOW PREP •Proactively providing “ramps” into the learning based on observed “broad”

Math Learning Stations: Trish Dutchie & Jennifer Finno

v Warm-Up: Complete and Turn In.

v Review Agenda

v Learning Stations

© 2016 by Doubet & Hockett

Page 38: Readiness Differentiation - Kristina J. Doubet Ph.D · 2 Kinds of Readiness Differentiation LOW PREP •Proactively providing “ramps” into the learning based on observed “broad”

JenniferTrish

Desks are in home seating

arrangement at beginning.

Students move them to station

formation.

© 2016 by Doubet & Hockett

Page 39: Readiness Differentiation - Kristina J. Doubet Ph.D · 2 Kinds of Readiness Differentiation LOW PREP •Proactively providing “ramps” into the learning based on observed “broad”

Small Groups in Sean’s ClassHe “allows students to make choices around content while we’re still unified around skills.”qCommonalities

ü EQ: “How do we pursue Justice?” ü Skills (constructing interview questions; infusing “voice” in informational writing; capturing/summarizing/

quoting ideas from research)ü Focus of Product (Public Awareness Campaign)

qDifferentiationü Interest (Topic & Format of Product)ü Readiness (Skills)

qTeacherü Provided a menu of choices and selected the topics of top interest to students. Grouped them according to interestü Pulled resources for them to use as they researched their topics and created their final productsü Created organizers, online tutorials/modules, schedules for small groups, etc.

qLesson We Saw: ü Interest groups working on what was needed for their product (same interest; mixed readiness)ü Small group working on Creative Writing (mixed interest; like readiness)ü Small group working with teacher on a skill (mixed interest; like readiness)

Page 40: Readiness Differentiation - Kristina J. Doubet Ph.D · 2 Kinds of Readiness Differentiation LOW PREP •Proactively providing “ramps” into the learning based on observed “broad”
Page 41: Readiness Differentiation - Kristina J. Doubet Ph.D · 2 Kinds of Readiness Differentiation LOW PREP •Proactively providing “ramps” into the learning based on observed “broad”

“Differentiation is making sure that the right students get the right learning tasks at the right time. Once you have a sense of what each student holds as ‘given’ or ‘known’ and what he or she needs in order to learn, differentiation is no longer an option; it is an obvious response.”

Assessment as Learning: Using Classroom Assessment to Maximize Student Learning

Lorna M. Earl – Corwin Press, Inc. – 2003 – P.86-87