ratio of energy consumption value to gdp source : gdp : economic and finance stats. q1/ 2002, bank...
TRANSCRIPT
Ratio of Energy Consumption Value to GDPRatio of Energy Consumption Value to GDP
Source : GDP : Economic and Finance Stats. Q1/ 2002, Bank of Thailand - http://www.bot.or.th/BOT homepage/databank/EconData/Thai_Key/Thai_Key.asp
Data 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002
GDP (at present value) 4,732,600 4,626,400 4,637,100 4,916,500 5,123,400 5,433,300
Value of Final Energy Demand 573,029 548,127 543,192 687,983 754,185 777,306
Ratio of Final Energy Demand to GDP 12.11 11.85 11.71 13.99 14.72 14.31
Value of Final Energy Demand Petroleum 320,408 306,417 303,000 409,037 432,409 437,564
Electricity 162,304 175,652 167,977 198,821 232,393 245,244
Natural Gas 5,671 5,494 6,815 11,696 13,670 15,992
Coal/Lignite 6,397 4,740 5,534 5,050 7,211 7,950
Renewable Energy 78,536 55,824 59,866 63,379 68,502 70,557
(Million Baht)
573777
1,529
2,145
1,090
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
1997 2002 2007 2012 2017
Forecasted Value of National Energy Forecasted Value of National Energy Consumption in the FutureConsumption in the Future
Unit: Billion Baht
(Assumption: Energy Elasticity = 1.4 :1 and Est. GDP Growth Rate = 5% per year)
World Primary Energy Consumption per Dollar of Gross Domestic Product 1980- - 2001
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
1980
1981
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
Btu
pe
r 19
95
U. S
. D
oll
ars
Us
ing
Ma
rke
t E
xc
ha
ng
e R
ate
s
USA
UK
FranceJapan
http://www.eia.doe.gov/pub/international/iealf/tablee1g.xlsEnergy Intensity [Total Primary Energy Consumption Per Dollar of Gross Domestic Product]
Comparison of Energy IntensityComparison of Energy Intensity
Malaysia
Thailand
Economic structure in developed countries has been reformed to save energy
Energy demand is 1.4 times higher than GDP growthEnergy demand is 1.4 times higher than GDP growth
Energy-GDP Elasticity
Avg.'85-20011998 1999 2000 20011994 1995 1996 19971990 1991 1992 1993
1.401.07Energy Elasticity 0.97
1985
1.47 1.08 1.511.24 1.34 1.64 1.94 -3.50 0.58 0.970.47
Source : EIA,DOE, BP Statistic Review of World Energy, EGAT
Energy Elasticity = Energy Elasticity = ∆∆tt Energy Energy Consumption/ Consumption/ ∆∆tt GDPGDP
Ave. Energy Elasticity1.4 : 1.0
New Target1 : 1
or lower
Thailand
573
777
1,529
2,145
1,090
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
2540 2545 2550 2555 2560
98
263
528
3,112
Value of Potential Energy SavedValue of Potential Energy Saved
Unit : Billion Baht
3.1 trillion Baht can be saved from energy efficiency
(Assumption: Energy Elasticity = 1:1 and GDP Growth Rate = 5% per year)
1997 2002 2007 2012 2017
Energy Consumption by Economic Sector
0
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
2535 2536 2537 2538 2539 2540 2541 2542 2543 2544 2545
ktoe
Transport 37%Transport 37%
Industry 36%Industry 36%
Resident & Commercial 21%Resident & Commercial 21%
Agriculture 6%Agriculture 6%
Industry=Manufacturing+Mining+Construction
1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002
Share of Energy Demand in the Transportation Sector in Thailand
Transport Mode Energy Demandktoe
Share(%)
Land Transportation 14,743 79.1Road 14,638 78.6
Rail 105 0.5
Water Transportation 851 4.6
Domestic 57 0.3
Overseas 794 4.3
Air Transportation 3,038 16.3Domestic 307 1.6
Overseas 2,731 14.7
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
40,000
45,000
50,000
55,000
Installed Capacity
Reserve Margin 15%
August-02
MW
BLCP
Co.
#1,2
2x6
73.25
MW
201020072005 2008 20092006 20112003 2004 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
SPPs
107
MW,
Lam T
aklon
gPum
p Stor
age #
1-2 2
x250
MW
. La
n Krab
eu 1
22 M
W,Bo
Win
713 MW
, Eas
tern P
ower
Co.,L
td. 35
0 MW
.
Sou
thern
Comb
ined C
ycle
Powe
r Plan
t 1x
700
MW
New
Pow
er Pla
nt 2x
700 MW
New
Pow
er Pla
nt 3x
700
MW
New
Powe
r Plan
t 3x
700
MW
North
Ban
gkok
& S
outh
Bang
kok
Com
bined
Cyc
le Po
wer P
lants
#3 2
x700
MW
.
New
Pow
er Pla
nt 1x
700 MW
New
Powe
r Plan
t 1x
700 MW
New
Pow
er Pla
nt 4x
700 MW
Lao-Na
m Th
ern 2
# 92
0 MW,
Ban
g Pak
ong C
ombin
ed C
ycle
Powe
r Plan
t #
5 1x7
00 M
W.
Gulf C
o., U
nion C
o. #1 2
x700
MW
Union
Co.
#2 1
x700
MW
New
Pow
er Pla
nt 3x
70W0 MW
Average power demand growth 1,580 MW per year
255325502548 2551 25522549 25542546 2547 2555 2556 2557 2558 2559
Power System Adequacy(Generation & Transmission Systems)
Power System Adequacy(Generation & Transmission Systems)
Reserve Margin 15%
Installed Capacity
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Structure of Community Development Fund UtilizationStructure of Community Development Fund Utilization
Community Development Fund (CDF)(3 Designated Authorizing Committees)
Provincial Committees of the CDFC
Community Committeesof the CDFC
Community Development Fund Committee (CDFC)
• consider fund utilization for the development of quality of life and the environment at the provincial level
• consider fund utilization for overall development of quality of life and the environment
• consider fund utilization for the development of quality of life and the environment at the local level
X% Y% Z%
consider fund utilization under the CDF framework
NakhonSrithammarat
Phuket
Andaman Sea
Gulf of Thailand
Trang
Trans-isthmus pipeline
Strategic crude Stockpiling
Phang Nga
Krabi
Petrochemical complex
Refinery
Refinery & Petrochemicalcomplex
Oil depotSichon
Oil depot
Tap Lamu
Existing road system
Marine Maintenance/repair
facility
Strategic Energy Landbridge
Trading centre for BIMST-EC OilPetrochemical
Pipeline
Length 240 KM.
Diameter 42”
Capacity 1.0 MBD
Tank Capacity 2 x 5.0 mm.BBL
Investment Cost 719 mm.USD