radiative transfer model by: nisha upadhyay. points covered… what is radiative transfer model?...
TRANSCRIPT
RADIATIVE TRANSFER MODEL
By: Nisha Upadhyay
Points Covered…
• What is Radiative Transfer Model?
• Different Types of RTM?
• What is PROSAIL?
• Inputs of PROSAIL.
• Retrieval of Biophysical Parameters using PROSAIL.• Simulation of PROSAIL.
• Inversion of PROSAIL.
Sensitivity Analysis
Radiative Transfer Model• Radiation transfer is the physical phenomenon of energy transfer in the form of electromagnetic radiation. The propagation of radiation through a medium is affected by absorption, emission, and scattering processes.
• Radiative Transfer Models (RTMs) calculate the flow of radiation (ultraviolet, visible or infrared light) through a plant canopy or planetary atmosphere.
• They can be used to predict the spectral transmission of the atmosphere, the light reflected or emitted from a plant, and the amount of energy absorbed or emitted at different levels.
“ RTM is used to study spectral transmission or signature of plants, light reflected or emitted from plant and amount of energy absorbed. ”
Continue...
Radiative Transfer Model…
Parameters that Governs RTMThere are three main parameters that govern the Radiative Transfer Modeling:
Soil Structure (Soil Brightness, Roughness)
“Higher the soil roughness more the anisotropic reflectance ”
Vegetation Architecture (LAI, Leaf Angle,etc.)
“ As LAI increases, reflectance also increase in NIR region ”
Leaf Biochemical Parameters. (Chlorophyll, Leaf structure)
“ As Chlorophyll increase, reflectance decreases in Visible Band (400 nm to 725 nm) ”
Continue...
Continue...
Radiative Transfer Model…
Types of RTMThere are two main categories of RTMs:
Homogeneous Models: The landscape is represented by a constant horizontal distribution of absorbing and scattering elements (sheets, branches, etc.).
Heterogeneous Models:The landscape is represented by a non-uniform space distribution of unspecified elements of the landscape.
e.g. deciduous and coniferous forests.
Continue...
• SUIT Model: Developed for a homogeneous canopy.
• SAIL Model: A canopy reflectance models.
• PROSPECT Model: Determine leaf reflectance and transmittance signatures in the optical domain.
• PROSAIL Model: POSPECT + SAIL = PROSAIL.
• GeoSAIL Model: Combination of geometric model with SAIL model that provides the reflectance and transmittance of the tree crowns and radiative transfer within the crowns is calculated using SAIL.
• FLIGHT Model: A three-dimensional ray-tracing model for the radiative transfer within crown boundaries and deterministic ray tracing between the crowns and other canopy components.
Different Radiative Transfer Models
Continue…
Different Radiative Transfer Models…
• Coupled atmosphere and canopy (CAC) model: An off nadir canopy reflectance model, was used to simulate multiple reflectances based on various combinations of canopy biophysical parameters.
Continue…
Continue…
Different Radiative Transfer Models…
SAIL (Scattering by Arbitrary Inclined Leaves) Model (Verhoef and Bunnik, 1981) :
• It is extension of the SUIT model and uses fraction of leaves at discrete leaf inclination angle as parameter. This model is also totally mathematically invertible.
• One of the earliest canopy reflectance models.
• SAIL considers the canopy as a horizontal, homogeneous, turbid, and infinitely extended vegetation layer composed of diffusely reflecting and transmitting elements.
• SAIL is a physics-based radiative transfer model used for simulating the hemispheric reflectance spectra of canopies under different viewing directions.
Inputs to SAIL: Structural canopy parameters (LAI, mean leaf inclination angle (θ1), hot-spot size parameter (s)), measurement configuration (zenith and relative azimuth viewing angles (θv, ψv), zenith solar angle (θs)), fraction of diffuse illumination (skyl), and soil spectral reflectance (ρs).
Output of SAILCanopy bidirectional reflectance.
Continue…
Continue…
Different Radiative Transfer Models…
SAIL:
Continue…
Continue…
Canopy Parameters: LAI Leaf Inclination Angle (θ1) hot-spot size parameter (s)
View & Illumination Parameter: Zenith and Relative Azimuth angles (θv, ψv)
Zenith Solar Angle (θs)
Fraction of Diffuse Illumination (skyl)
SAIL Soil Spectral Reflectance (ρs))
Canopy Bidirectional Reflectance
PROSPECT (Jacquemoud and Barret, 1990) :
• PROSPECT model describing the optical properties of plant leaves from the visible (400 nm) to the shortwave infrared (2500 nm).
• It is based on representation of the leaf as one or several absorbing plates with rough surfaces giving rise to isotropic scattering.
• Relates foliar biochemistry and scattering parameters to leaf reflectance and transmittance spectra.
• It can readily be coupled with SAILH to facilitate direct modeling of the impact of chlorophyll, water and leaf dry matter constituents on the reflectance of a complete plant canopy.
Inputs to PROSPECTLeaf structure parameter N, chlorophyll a + b concentration (Cab) (μg/cm2), equivalent water thickness (Cw) (cm), and dry matter content (Cm) (g/cm2).
Output of PROSPECTLeaf reflectance and transmittance signatures in the visible spectrum.
Continue…
Continue…
Different Radiative Transfer Models…
PROSPECT:
Continue…
Different Radiative Transfer Models…
Leaf structure parameter N
Chlorophyll a + b concentration (Cab)
Equivalent Water Thickness (Cw)
Dry Matter Content (Cm)
PROSPECT
Hemispherical Leaf Reflectance and Transmittance Spectrum
PROSAIL (Jacquemoud 1993) :
• The PROSAIL canopy reflectance model was developed by linking the PROSPECT leaf optical properties model and the SAIL canopy bidirectional reflectance model.
• PROSAIL uses 14 input parameters to define leaf pigment content, leaf water content, canopy architecture, soil background reflectance, hot spot size, solar diffusivity, and solar geometry.
• Based on these inputs, the model calculates canopy bidirectional reflectance from 400 to 2500 nm in 1 nm increments.
Continue…
Continue…
Different Radiative Transfer Models…
PROSAIL = PROSPECT + SAIL
Continue…
Different Radiative Transfer Models…
Canopy Parameters: LAI Leaf Inclination Angle (θ1) Hot-spot size parameter (s)
View & Illumination Parameter: Zenith and Relative Azimuth angles (θv, ψv) Zenith Solar Angle (θs)
Fraction of Diffuse Illumination (skyl)
Soil Spectral Reflectance (ρs))SAIL
Equivalent Water Thickness (Cw)
Chlorophyll a + b concentration (Cab)
Leaf structure parameter N
Dry Matter Content (Cm) PROSPECT
Leaf Reflectance and Transmittance Spectrum
Bidirectional Canopy Reflectance
PROSAIL Model
Inputs of PROSAILThere are 14 input parameters to PROSAIL model:
1.Chlorophyll a + b concentration (Cab) (μg/cm2): Measured using DMSO (Dimethyl Sulphoxide).
2. Equivalent Water Thickness (Cw) (cm):
Cw = (Fresh weight of leaf (gm) – dry weight of leaf (gm))/Area of leaf (cm²)
3. Dry Matter Content (Cm) :
Cm = Dry weight of leaf / Area
4. hSpot: hspot = Leaf length / Leaf height.
5. Car (µg.cm-2): carotenoid content.
6. Cbrown: brown pigment content.
7. N: Structural Coefficient (unit less)
Inputs of PROSAIL
8. Leaf Area Index (LAI): Leaf area per unit ground surface area. Structural Coefficient (unit less).
9. Average leaf angle (angl): description of the angular orientation of the leaves.
10. Soil coefficient (psoil):
11. Diffuse/direct radiation (skyl)
12. Solar zenith angle (tts): Angle between sun position and with respect to zenith
13. Observer zenith angle (tto): Angle between observer (sensor) position and with respect to zenith.
14. Azimuth (°) (psi): Angle between observer (sensor) position with respect to north.
Simulation of PROSAIL•Simulation of PROSAIL model requires 14 input parameters.
•Before simulation of PROSAIL , sensitivity analysis is to be performed. Why ?
we will see down the line …
•Simulation of PROSAIL model based on the input parameters LAI, Cab, Cw, Car.
•Comparison of simulated spectra and field measured spectra.
•RMSE calculation.
•For lowest RMSE corresponding zenith angle is selected as hot spot angle.
Continue…
Inversion of PROSAILThere are various inversion strategies have been proposed. They are :
Numerical optimization methods (Bicheron and Loroy, 1999; Goel and Thompson, 1984).
Look Up Table based approaches (Combal et al., 2002; Knyazikhin et al, 1998; Weiss et al., 2000)
Artificial Neural Networks (Atgberger et al, 2003a ; Baret et al, 1995; Weiss et al., 2000).
Principal Component Inversion technique (Satapathy and Dadwal, 2005)
PEST algorithm
Support vector machines regression: (Durbha et al., 2007).
Genetic Algorithm (GA): Jin and Wang, 1999.
Continue…
Inversion of PROSAIL
Inversion of PROSAIL Using Look Up Table (LUT)
•LUT generation and conversion of generated thousands of LUT spectra’s into 7 bands of MODIS or any required band combination by the use of HyperAgri.
•Inversion program of PROSAIL take 7 band combination and hot spot position as input to calculate Lai, Cab, Car parameters as output values.
•RMSE is calculated for field obtained values and values obtainaed from PROSAIL Inversion.
Continue…
Continue…
Simulation of PROSAIL
Sensitivity Analysis•Sensitivity analysis is performed to study the effect of LAI, cab, Car on the spectra of vegetation.
•These three are the main biophysical parameter which governs the spectra of a vegetation.
Sensitivity Analysis for LAI
Continue…
Refl
ecta
nce
Wavelength (nm)
LAI is dominant in NIR Region i.e. 700-1000 nm. Why?Due to the canopy structural development and
multiple scattering which is particularly important at these wavelengths.
When LAI increases reflectance also increases. After a certain increase in LAI value the changes in
LAI spectra are very small because of shadow effect of plant leaves.
A inverse effect is noted for SWIR (2000 – 2300 nm) in LAI spectra. Why?
For every increase in LAI value the spectral response is very low. This is because in SWIR region soil reflectance effect is dominant and with increase in LAI (more coverage of ground) the effect of soil reflectance decreases because of canopy shadow effect.
Simulation of PROSAIL
Sensitivity Analysis for Chlorophyll
Continue…
Continue… R
eflec
tanc
e
Wavelength (nm)
Chlorophyll interactions with radiation are limited to the optical domain ranging from 400 nm to 725 nm.
Chlorophyll content derives about 60% of reflectance variation in visible range.
Lower chlorophyll value, higher the reflectance and vice versa.
Why ?Increase in chlorophyll results in
high absorption of sun light and hence lower reflection. Where as decrease in chlorophyll pigments results in lesser absorption of sun light and high reflectance.
Combined effects of LAI and Chlorophyll occur over the red edge region where LAI and chlorophyll density increase contribute to the shift of the red edge position.
Simulation of PROSAIL
Sensitivity Analysis for Water Content (Cw)
Continue…
Continue… R
eflec
tanc
e
Wavelength (nm)
Water content is a dominating factor in SWIR region of Vegetation Spectrum.
Higher the water content value lower the reflectance.
Effects of water content on leaf reflectance showed that sensitivity of leaf reflectance to water content was greatest in spectral bands centered at 1450, 1940, and 2500 nm.
Simulation of PROSAIL
Sensitivity Analysis for Carotenoid
Continue…
Continue…
Refl
ecta
nce
Wavelength (nm)
When Carotenoids increases reflectance decreases.
Spectral variation for different ranges of carotenoids has been noticed for 500nm -560nm.
Cm
Cm= Dry weight/Leaf Area
Continue…
Sensitivity Analysis for Dry Matter Content (Cm)
Simulation of PROSAIL
Wavelength (nm)
Refl
ecta
nce
Dry matter content is a dominating factor in NIR region.
Higher the value lower the reflectance.
Leaf Angle
Wavelength (nm)
Refl
ecta
nce
Continue… Simulation of PROSAIL
Sensitivity Analysis for Leaf Angle
As leaf angle increases the reflectance decreases in NIR region
Spectra validation
RMSE1 0.015965 RMSE2 0.014256 RMSE3 0.025233
Spectra validation
RMSE1 0.054231RMSE2 0.014782RMSE3 0.020301
RMSE1 0.054230638RMSE2 0.014782031RMSE3 0.020301355
Spectra validation of Wheat Crop 28 Feb 2012
RMSE1 0.01990675 RMSE2 0.01666175 RMSE3 0.02420385
RMSE1 0.020182894 RMSE2 0.011387273 RMSE3 0.019610445
RMSE1 0.019149RMSE2 0.016087RMSE3 0.027433
Spectra validation of Wheat Crop 28 Feb 2012
RMSE1 0.032717 RMSE2 0.039955 RMSE3 0.038231
Spectra validation of Wheat Crop15 Mar 2012
RMSE1 0.049089561 RMSE2 0.049377422 RMSE3 0.010035917
RMSE1 0.038534 RMSE2 0.0417963 RMSE3 0.0090401
Spectra validation of Wheat Crop15 Mar 2012
RMSE1 0.036355 RMSE2 0.037048 RMSE3 0.008087
Validation of whole spectraRoot Mean Square Error
22 Feb 2012 28 Feb 2012
15 Mar 2012
Input Parameters for LUT
Parameters Max. Range Interval
Cw 0.01 – 0.05 0.001
Cab 30 – 100 1
LAI 0.1 – 6 2
Inversion Results
Parameters
Observed Predicted
22-Feb-12 28-Feb-12 15-Mar-12 22-Feb-12 28-Feb-12 15-Mar-12
Cw 0.02 0.02 0.015 0.017 0.022 0.028
Cab 60 60 60 59.84 57.96 52.13
LAI 4.5 4.1 3.5 4.57 4.18 4.17
Thank You