questions about memory
DESCRIPTION
Questions about Memory. Do we learn only with intention – or also without intention? We learn with and without intention. Is learning influenced by what we already know? And if so, how?. The two-edged sword. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Questions about Memory](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022052312/56813ae0550346895da32fc6/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Questions about Memory
1. Do we learn only with intention – or also without intention?
We learn with and without intention.
2. Is learning influenced by what we already know? And if so, how?
![Page 2: Questions about Memory](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022052312/56813ae0550346895da32fc6/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
The two-edged sword
What we already know can help us perceive what is out there in the world (encoding) and help us recall it (retrieval).
It can also cause us to see what we expect (not what’s there) or to construct a memory of “what usually happens” (not what actually happened).
![Page 3: Questions about Memory](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022052312/56813ae0550346895da32fc6/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
What we already know (WWAK)
1. Knowledge effects at encoding Levels of Processing theory Criticisms of LoP
2. Knowledge effects at retrieval Transfer Appropriate Training Encoding Specificity
![Page 4: Questions about Memory](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022052312/56813ae0550346895da32fc6/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Knowledge effects at encoding
Levels of Processing theory – Craik & Lockhart (1972)
In 1950s & 60s, CP was most interested in questions about structure (e.g., SM – STM – LTM).
In early 1970’s, CP became more interested in process
Craik & Lockhart said, ability to recall a stimulus depends upon how you processed it.
![Page 5: Questions about Memory](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022052312/56813ae0550346895da32fc6/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Craik & Lockhart’s (1972) tenets:
1. Ease of information retrieval depends upon type of code generated at learning.
2. Kind of code generated depends on your purpose when you first process the information.
E.g., are you looking for a red thing among green things? Then generate visual codes.
![Page 6: Questions about Memory](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022052312/56813ae0550346895da32fc6/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Craik & Lockhart’s (1972) evidence
Orienting task - subjects read a list of words and answer one of three questions:
Which words in list contain letter 'e'? Which words in list rhyme with CANE? Which words in list name animate objects?
On surprise recall test, success varies with orienting task: Semantic > Rhyme > Spelling
![Page 7: Questions about Memory](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022052312/56813ae0550346895da32fc6/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Levels of Processing – the basic effect
Dependence of recall on orienting task is the basic levels of processing effect
Probability of recall varies with type of code generated when learning.
See also studies described in text (pp. 153 - 156)
Why does this effect happen?
![Page 8: Questions about Memory](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022052312/56813ae0550346895da32fc6/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Levels of Processing – the explanation
Craik & Lockhart – 2 types of rehearsal: Maintenance Rehearsal
uses articulatory loop simply saying words over and over
Elaborative Rehearsal
uses the meaning of the object or event requires establishing associations
![Page 9: Questions about Memory](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022052312/56813ae0550346895da32fc6/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Levels of Processing – the explanation
Compare sound [banana] vs. meaning "banana" - what associations can be made?
Semantic associations are richer, more distinctive – therefore more memorable.
LoP effect reflects richer associations to stimuli processed for meaning.
![Page 10: Questions about Memory](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022052312/56813ae0550346895da32fc6/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Criticisms of LoP Theory
Baddeley – L.O.P Theory is circular
Which levels produce best memory? Deepest
Which levels are deepest? Those that produce best memory.
No independent way of assessing ‘depth.’
![Page 11: Questions about Memory](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022052312/56813ae0550346895da32fc6/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Criticisms of LoP Theory
Baddeley – result does not generalize to other tasks.
E.g., Glenberg, Smith, & Green (1972) – LoP effect not found for recognition task.
Recognition task: subject shown “old” and “new” stimuli, asked to say which is which.
Recognition task generally easier than recall task.
![Page 12: Questions about Memory](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022052312/56813ae0550346895da32fc6/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Knowledge effects at retrieval
Bransford – Transfer Appropriate Training
LoP – memory performance depends upon conditions under which encoding occurs.
Bransford – memory performance also depends upon conditions under which retrieval occurs.
![Page 13: Questions about Memory](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022052312/56813ae0550346895da32fc6/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Transfer Appropriate Training
Morris, Bransford, & Franks (1977)
used semantic & rhyme orienting tasks
at retrieval, some subjects asked to recall words seen during orienting task.
others asked to detect words that rhymed with words seen during orienting task.
![Page 14: Questions about Memory](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022052312/56813ae0550346895da32fc6/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Transfer Appropriate Training
Morris et al. (1977)
Group Task atOrientation Retrieval
1 Semantic Recall2 Semantic Rhyme3 Rhyme Recall4 Rhyme Rhyme
![Page 15: Questions about Memory](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022052312/56813ae0550346895da32fc6/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Transfer Appropriate Training
Morris et al. (1977) - Results
Recall Rhyme Judgment
SO > RO RO > SO
Encode for the way you plan to use the information.
SO: Semantic orienting RO: Rhyme orienting
![Page 16: Questions about Memory](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022052312/56813ae0550346895da32fc6/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Knowledge effects at retrieval
Bransford’s idea was that retrieval success depends upon the match between what happens at retrieval and what happens at encoding.
At the time, it was a radical idea, because most researchers still believed (as behaviourists argued) that behaviour was governed by pre-existing learning…
![Page 17: Questions about Memory](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022052312/56813ae0550346895da32fc6/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Knowledge effects at retrieval
If behaviour was controlled by pre-existing learning, it shouldn’t matter whether retrieval conditions matched learning conditions.
Match/mismatch could not alter the facts about pre-existing learning.
Bransford’s results questioned this idea. So did Tulving’s (Tulving & Osler, 1968).
![Page 18: Questions about Memory](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022052312/56813ae0550346895da32fc6/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Encoding Specificity Theory
Thomson & Tulving (1970)
Subjects learned a list of words for later recall.
Some subjects got words without a context.
Subjects who got words in a context, got either strong or weak contexts.
![Page 19: Questions about Memory](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022052312/56813ae0550346895da32fc6/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Encoding Specificity Theory
In Thompson & Tulving’s (1970) study, subjects were given pairs of cues & targets in the learning phase. Then, in the test phase, they were given the cue and asked to recall the target.
Learn Recall cue Response
COLD – hot hot COLD
![Page 20: Questions about Memory](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022052312/56813ae0550346895da32fc6/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Encoding Specificity Theory
Thompson & Tulving (1970)
Condition Learn Recall cue
Strong 1 COLD – hot hot
Strong 2 COLD – hot blow
![Page 21: Questions about Memory](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022052312/56813ae0550346895da32fc6/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Encoding Specificity Theory
Thompson & Tulving (1970)
Condition Learn Recall cue
Weak 1 COLD – blow hot
Weak 2 COLD – blow blow
![Page 22: Questions about Memory](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022052312/56813ae0550346895da32fc6/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Encoding Specificity Theory
Predictions:
If long-term learning is most important, then hot should have been a better cue for COLD than blow, regardless of learning condition.
If blow is a better cue (when it is presented at learning), that means that context matters.
![Page 23: Questions about Memory](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022052312/56813ae0550346895da32fc6/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Encoding Specificity Theory
Thompson & Tulving’s results:
Probability of recall with blow as cue was higher than with hot as cue, when blow was presented at learning.
A cue is more effective if it re-establishes the learning context. This was a radical idea at the time.
![Page 24: Questions about Memory](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022052312/56813ae0550346895da32fc6/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Review – Craik & Lockhart
Type of code you generate when you process a stimulus varies with your purpose.
Ability to retrieve a stimulus later varies with type of code you generated.
Maintenance Rehearsal involves simply repeating the stimulus, without creating new connnections.
![Page 25: Questions about Memory](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022052312/56813ae0550346895da32fc6/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Review – Craik & Lockhart
Deeper processing gives access to meaning, which permits more elaboration.
Elaborative Rehearsal involves working out connections between the new stimulus and what we already know.
Greater elaboration usually leads to better memory.
![Page 26: Questions about Memory](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022052312/56813ae0550346895da32fc6/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Review – Criticisms of LoP Theory
Baddeley:
LoP theory is circular.
LoP effects do not generalize well to tasks other than recall.
![Page 27: Questions about Memory](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022052312/56813ae0550346895da32fc6/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Review – Morris, Bransford, & Franks
Transfer Appropriate Training:
Conditions at retrieval are important as well as conditions at encoding.
Encode for the way you plan to use the information
![Page 28: Questions about Memory](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022052312/56813ae0550346895da32fc6/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Review – Thompson & Tulving
Encoding Specificity theory:
You encode aspects of context when you learn new information.
Cues help most in retrieval if they re-establish the learning context.