quantified self revolution december 2013

23
ping With Technology stel De Maeyer Quantified Self' revolutie cember 2013 l Informatics, a solution for behavior entive healthcare?

Upload: do-the-right-thing

Post on 07-May-2015

301 views

Category:

Technology


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Quantified Self Revolution December 2013

Sleeping With TechnologyChristel De MaeyerDe 'Quantified Self' revolutie5 december 2013

Personal Informatics, a solution for behavior change in preventive healthcare?

Page 2: Quantified Self Revolution December 2013

Overview

• Personal Informatics?• Behavior Design?• Overview of tools I research• Research Question • How? Fogg’s MAT model and Behavior Grid• Theory in real world practise• Results

sleep efficiency 97% last night, feeling crispy!

Page 3: Quantified Self Revolution December 2013

Personal Informatics

• A set of tools to map behavior• Aim to change behavior• Biggest market today lifestyle, wellbeing, health,

40.000 mobile health apps in 2012• 60% US is tracking exercise, diets, weight• 33 % tracks other aspects, sleep patterns, blood

pressure, blood sugar• 27 % Internet users track health data online• 9 % Signed up for text messaging health alerts

Page 4: Quantified Self Revolution December 2013

Connecting

AnythingAnyoneAnytime

Page 5: Quantified Self Revolution December 2013

Self-Tracking Apps

Eatery App Lift App Runkeeper App

Page 6: Quantified Self Revolution December 2013

Self-Tracking Devices

Page 7: Quantified Self Revolution December 2013

Self-Tracking Devices Dashboards

Page 8: Quantified Self Revolution December 2013

Behavior Design

• Persuasive technology – Behavior design

• Target audience is central – starting from habits-behavior

• Triggers – Hot and Cold • Simplicity• Three core motivators

Page 9: Quantified Self Revolution December 2013

Model for understanding persuasive side of devices and software application

Fogg, 2008

Simplicity factors depending on person and context to create more ability, the more ability the more motivation

- Time- Money- Braincycles- Physical effort- Social acceptance- Non-Routine

Page 10: Quantified Self Revolution December 2013

3 Core Motivators each 2 facets

Fogg, 2008

Page 11: Quantified Self Revolution December 2013

Measuring Behavior and Behavioral Change

Fogg, 2010, Behavior Grid and Wizzard

Page 12: Quantified Self Revolution December 2013

Hot and Cold triggers

Put HOT triggers in the path of motivated people

Page 13: Quantified Self Revolution December 2013

Is 24/7 self-monitoring creating enough awareness and persuasion to get a balanced lifestyle?

Will it bring a general wellbeing with self-monitored people?

Page 14: Quantified Self Revolution December 2013

Measuring:

Calorie burningFood IntakeStepsPhysical ActivitySleep

Behavior change through technology or Persuasive Technology

Body Media armband as a measuring device

Page 15: Quantified Self Revolution December 2013

Sampling

Gender Age Culture Lifestyle

Page 16: Quantified Self Revolution December 2013

October - November

Phase I Fall

tracking

December - February

Phase II Silent Period

March-April

Phase III Spring

tracking

Mid-Long Period Research

Page 17: Quantified Self Revolution December 2013

Selfmonitoring process

Goal setting

Data interpretation

Coaching/feedback loop

Taxonomy of Self-Monitoring

Personal Coaching

Ananthanarayan, Siek, 2012Fogg, 2007

Adapted taxonomy

Page 18: Quantified Self Revolution December 2013

Findings

Phase III Spring 2013

3 core motivators- Sensation: pleasure, ‘new’, curiosity- Anticipation: hope, trigger to change

something- Social cohesion: being part of

something cool, group feeling

Phase I Fall 2012

3 core motivators turn into negative behavior with someparticipants:Sensation: ‘new’ & ‘curiosity’ goneAnticipation: confrontation with dataSocial cohesion: rejection, outside world reactions

Phase II Winter8 out of 10 experimentersstop self-tracking

device created dependencies:without device =Back to old routines, less awareness

Phase III 2 women dropped out – Data frustration- Problems with the deviceOne only tracked herself for 20 % ignorable dataMen more consistent focus on sleep and activityWomen focus on weight loss, more difficult to do

Page 19: Quantified Self Revolution December 2013

Findings – Dot and Span Behavior

Ability factors/Context factors: (Money, Time, Brain Cycles, Physical Effort, None-Routine, Out of the Ordinary)Device:• Fall: feels comfortable, identifies with it, but

first signs of ‘Out of the ordinary’• Spring: doing good = ‘takes time’, less comfort

in long time wearing, outsiders remarks ‘Out of the ordinary’

Page 20: Quantified Self Revolution December 2013

Behavior:• Fall: small changes, creating routines

instructed, brain cycles (cognitive investment) made

• Spring: due to stop, routine not established, lack of maintenance in habit forming and cognitive effort

Findings – Dot and Span Behavior

Page 21: Quantified Self Revolution December 2013

Culture and season:• Culture: SF vibrant city, nature aspects,

attractive to be active (not representative for US!). BE city vs rural area, latter more attractive

• Season: SF weather is a trigger to go outside. BE seasonal effect, weather dependency high, less activity

Findings – Dot and Span Behavior

Page 22: Quantified Self Revolution December 2013

Conclusion

• Facilitate (triggers and higher the ability, instead of motivate behavior change)

• Simplicity stimulates behavior change• What do we want people to do?• Help people what they already want to do

• It has to be very easy! (LarkLife – Body Media) • Zeo Bedside Model versus Zeo Mobile• Mainstream? Intuitive, discrete, second skin, less expensive,

seamless synchronizing process, data presentation, there needs to be a need!

Page 23: Quantified Self Revolution December 2013

Thanks Christel De Maeyer

[email protected]://Sleepingwithtechnology.com