psu world ranking analysis 2013...
TRANSCRIPT
PSU World Ranking Analysis2013 20142013‐2014
Perapong TekasakulPerapong Tekasakul
Vice President for Research System and Graduate Studies
20142014
• The Times Higher Education BRICS & Emerging Economies Rankings 2014 powered by ThomsonEconomies Rankings 2014 powered by Thomson Reuters includes only institutions in countries classified as “emerging economies” by FTSEclassified as emerging economies by FTSE, including the “BRICS” nations of Brazil, Russia, India China and South AfricaIndia, China and South Africa.
• The top universities ranking uses the same methodology as the Times Higher Educationmethodology as the Times Higher EducationWorld University Rankings.
I di tIndicators
Teaching: The learning environment (30%)
Research: Volume income reputation (30%)Research: Volume, income, reputation (30%)
Citations: Research influence (30%)
Industry income: Innovation (2.5%)
I t ti l tl k P l h (7 5%)International outlook: People, research (7.5%)
Thai and ASEAN Universities ranked
University Rank Overall Teaching International Outlook
Industry Income
Research Citations
100% 30% 7.5% 2.5% 30% 30%KMUTT 29 33.0 13.0 24.4 62.2 10.5 75.4MU 52 26.7 28.6 42.0 38.5 14.3 32.3CMU 82 21.0 19.7 32.4 30.4 10.0 29.6CU 85 20.3 22.8 29.8 38.0 15.5 19.0PSU 89 19.7 13.4 33.1 28.7 7.9 33.7
UniversitiKebangsaanMalaysiaMalaysia 77 22.3 22.5 49.8 29.3 11.5 25.6Universiti Putra Malaysia 95 18 21.4 32.1 32.8 12.3 15.6
Times Higher Education (THE) World University Ranking Indicators20132013
PSU ‐ v ‐ KMUTT
100Teaching (30%)
50Research (30%)International
0
Research (30%)outlook (7.5%)
PSU
KMUTT
Citations (30%)Industry income (2.5%)
KMUTT
Indicators by CategoryAcademic staff /
students
TEACHING INDICATORS
Indicators by Category50
100
Doctoral degrees awarded / d d t
Institutional income /
0
undergraduate degrees awarded
/academic staff
PSU
Doctoral degrees awarded /
academic staff
Teaching reputation
PSU
KMUTT
Papers / academic and reseach staff
RESEARCH&CITATIONS INDICATORS
A d i ff
INTERNATIONAL OUTLOOK INDICATORS
50
100
and reseach staff (normalized)
100
Academic staff ‐international / academic staff
0Research income / academic staff (normalized)
Normalized Citation Impact (country
adjusted) 0
50PSU
KMUTT
Research reputation
PSU
KMUTT
Students ‐international /
students
Papers ‐ international co‐author / papers
Indicators by SubjectTEACHING AND INSTITUTIONAL INDICATORS
100CH
Academic staff / students
100CH
Doctoral degrees awarded / academic staff
50 LSSS
PSU
50 LSSS
CH Cli i l li i l
0
PSAH
KMUTT 0
PSAH
PSU
KMUTT
CH Clinical, pre‐clinical & health
LS Life sciencesPS Physical sciencesET Engineering &
ET ET
CH
Teaching reputation Institutional income / academic stafftechnology
AH Arts & humanitiesSS Social sciences
50
100CH
LSSS50
100CH
LSSS
0PSU
KMUTT 0PSU
KMUTT
PS
ET
AH PS
ET
AH
RESEARCH & CITATION IMPACT INDICATORS
Papers / academic and reseach staff R h i / d i t ff
100CH
Papers / academic and reseach staff
100CH
Research income / academic staff
0
50 LSSS
PSU
KMUTT0
50 LSSS
PSU
KMUTT
CH Clinical, pre‐clinical
PSAH
KMUTT
PSAH
a , p e a& health
LS Life sciencesPS Physical sciencesET Engineering &
technology
ETET
100CH
Research reputation Normalized Citation Impact (country adjusted)
technologyAH Arts & humanitiesSS Social sciences
50
100
LSSS
50
100CH
LSSS
0PSU
KMUTT 0
PSU
KMUTT
PS
ET
AH PS
ET
AH
INTERNATIONAL OUTLOOK INDICATORS
CH Clinical, pre‐clinical & health100
CH
Academic staff ‐ international / academic staff
LS Life sciencesPS Physical sciencesET Engineering & technology
50 LSSS
AH Arts & humanitiesSS Social sciences
0
PSAH
PSU
KMUTT
PS
ET
AH
100CH
Papers ‐ international co‐author / papers
50 LSSS
PSU
0
PSAH
PSU
KMUTT
PS
ET
AH
Score and Rank
) h iUniversities Name ASIAN Rank ASEAN Rank Country Rank
Ch l l k U i i 103 4 1
SCImago Institutional Ranking 2013
1) Thai Universities
Chulalongkorn University 103 4 1Mahidol University 116 7 2Chiang Mai University 218 11 3Kasetsart University 284 13 4Prince of Songkla University 300 14 5King Mongkut's University of Technology Thonburi 336 16 6Khon Kaen University 351 17 7King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang 385 19 8Siriraj Hospital 477 22 9Thammasat University 498 23 10Thammasat University 498 23 10Asian Institute of Technology 523 24 11Ramathibodi Hospital 630 28 12Suranaree University of Technology 666 32 13National Electronics and Computer Technology Center 763 40 14
h kh
2) Other Universities
Mahasarakham University 767 41 15Silpakorn University 804 49 16Srinakharinwirot University 842 51 17
2) Other UniversitiesUniversities Name ASIAN Rank ASEAN Rank Country Rank
National University of Singapore 15 1 1Nanyang Technological University 20 2 2Agency for Science, Technology and Research Singapore 52 3 3University of Malaya 104 5 1Science University of Malaysia 105 6 2Universiti Putra Malaysia 119 8 3National University of Malaysia 125 9 4University of Technology Malaysia 211 10 5National University Health System 280 12 4
SCImago Ranking Comparison by criteriaSCImago Ranking Comparison by criteria
U i iti NCriterias
SC1 SC2 SC3 SC4 SC5 SC6 SC7 SC8Universities Name SC1:Output
SC2:IC(%)
SC3:Q1(%)
SC4:NI
SC5:Spec.
SC6:Exc(%)
SC7:% Lead
SC8:EwL
Science University of Malaysia (USM) 6,754 31.63 22.59 0.83 0.65 9.33 78.53 7.45Mahidol University 6,217 42.87 43.80 1.01 0.65 9.85 54.99 3.15Universiti Putra Malaysia 6,179 24.92 16.64 0.62 0.67 5.86 74.27 4.02National University of Malaysia 5,911 17.93 13.42 0.69 0.63 7.08 71.05 4.65University of Technology Malaysia 3,573 28.13 13.74 0.82 0.74 9.65 70.86 6.88Chiang Mai University 3,469 42.35 36.67 1.03 0.63 9.01 60.82 4.00g y ,Kasetsart University 2,645 44.69 31.00 0.66 0.74 5.65 61.36 2.00Prince of Songkla University 2,552 41.54 32.80 0.88 0.72 7.62 65.40 4.20
Indicators
SC1 Output (O)
SC2 International Collaboration (IC)SC2 International Collaboration (IC)
SC3 High Quality Publication (Q1)
SC4 Normalized Impact (NI)SC4 Normalized Impact (NI)
SC5 Specialization Index (Spec.)
SC6 Excellence Rate (Exc.)SC6 Excellence Rate (Exc.)
SC7 Scientific Leadership (Lead)
Comparison of Universities by SCImago ranking indicators
Science University of Malaysia (6) Mahidol University (7) Universiti Putra Malaysia (8)
National University of Malaysia (9) University of Technology Malaysia (10) Chiang Mai University (11)
Kasetsart University (13) PSU (14)
60 00
70.00
80.00SC1: Output (%)
y ( ) ( )
30.00
40.00
50.00
60.00SC2: IC(%)SC7: %Lead
0.00
10.00
20.00
SC3: Q1(%)SC6: Exc(%)
SC4 NI(%)SC5 S SC4: NI(%)SC5: Spec.
A National Research University
Benchmarking with USM: PSU Targets
SC1: Output (O) Increase 20% each year from PSU in the year 2013
SC2: International Collaboration (%IC) Increase 10% each year from PSU in the year 2013
7 000
8,000
9,000
SC1: Output
60.8260.00
70.00
SC2: IC(%)
2,5523,062
3,674
4,408
5,290
3 000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
USM
PSU
PSU(fc)
41.54
45.6950.26
55.29
30.00
40.00
50.00
USM
PSU
PSU(fc)2,552
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 20170.00
10.00
20.00
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Detail: Total number of documents published in scholarly journals indexed in Scopus
Detail: Institution’s output ratio produced in collaboration with foreign institutions The values are computed by analyzing an institution’s outputScopus. institutions. The values are computed by analyzing an institution s output whose affiliations include more than one country address.
SC3: High Quality Publication (%Q1): Increase 20% each year from PSU in the year 2013
SC4: Normalized Impact (NI): Increase 20% each year from PSU in the year 2013y y
48.0250 00
60.00
SC3: Q1(%)
1 17
1.281.20
1.40
SC4: NI
32.8036.08
39.68
43.66
30.00
40.00
50.00
USM
PSU
PSU(fc)
0.880.96
1.06
1.17
0.60
0.80
1.00
USM
PSU
PSU(f )
0.00
10.00
20.00
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
PSU(fc)
0.00
0.20
0.40
PSU(fc)
Detail: Ratio of publications that an institution publishes in the most fl l h l l l f h ld h k d h f l
Detail: The normalization of the citation values is done on an individual article l l h l ( ) h h l h b ’
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
influential scholarly journals of the world, those ranked in the first quartile (25%) in their categories as ordered by SCImago Journal Rank indicator.
level. The values (in %) show the relationship between an institution’s average scientific impact and the world average set to a score of 1, ‐‐i.e. a NI score of 0.8 means the institution is cited 20% below world average and 1.3 means the institution is cited 30% above average.
SC5: Specialization Index (Spec.) Increase 20% each year from PSU in the year 2013
SC6: Excellence Rate (%Exc.) Increase 10% from USM in the Year 2016
0.98
1.051.00
1.20
SC5: Spec.
9.5
11.22
10.00
12.00
SC6: Exc(%)
0.720.79
0.87
0.40
0.60
0.80
USM
PSU
PSU(fc)
7.628.00
8.60
4 00
6.00
8.00
USM
PSU
PSU(fc)
0.00
0.20
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 20170.00
2.00
4.00
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Detail: The specialization Index indicates the extent of thematic concentration/dispersion of an institution’s scientific output. Values range
Detail: Excellence rate indicates the amount (in %) of an institution’s scientific output that s included into the set of the 10% of the most cited papers in their
between 0 to 1, indicating generalistic vs. specialized institutions respectively. This indicator is computed according to the Gini Index used in Economy.
respective scientific fields. It is a measure of high quality fields. It is a measure of high quality output of reasearch institutions.
SC7: Scientific Leadership (%Lead) Increase 10% from USM in the SC8: Excellence with Leadership (%EwL.) Increase 10% from USM in Year 2016 the Year 2016
93.3390 00
100.00
SC7: %Lead12.00
SC8: %EwL.
65.4069.60
77.90
87.40
50.00
60.00
70.00
80.00
90.00
USM
PSU
6.70
8.65
10.04
6.00
8.00
10.00
USM
PSU
0 00
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00PSU
PSU(fc)4.20
5.20
2.00
4.00
PSU
PSU(fc)
Detail: Leadership indicates and institution’s “output as main countributor”, that is the number of papers in which the corresponding author belongs to the i tit ti
Detail: Excellence with Leadership indicates the amount of documents in the Excellence rate in which the institution is the main contributor.
0.002008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
0.002008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
institution.
Strength and WeaknessStrength•Strong focus of research•High quality research (impact factors & citations) •Strong international collaborationHi h f t ff i•High performance staff in some areas
•Variety of disciplines
Weakness•Low research output (quantity)Low research output (quantity)•Low number of international faculty and students•Low number of student exchange (inbound/outbound)•Relatively unrecognizable in an international level•Low number of Ph.D. students •Low teaching quality (student/faculty ratio)•Low teaching quality (student/faculty ratio)•Low industry income
ApproachesCampaign PackageCampaign Package
“Top 10 in ASEAN on 50th Anniversary – Feet on the ground heads in the cloud”
• Declare a “Research Week” when everyone stops other works but write a paper• Create culture for research by aiming at quality
ground, heads in the cloud
o Transfer focus to every faculty including individual dialogo Redesign the evaluation and rewarding system, and measure output and
productivity based on publications, research grants and student training for individual. Be SPECIFIC rather than broad
o Set up personal research account for awarding money• Increase international research collaboration with outstanding universities (inside
d t id )and outside)o Support research collaboration with top institutes to increase high‐quality
publicationo Appoint Honorary Professors from well known professors collaborating witho Appoint Honorary Professors from well‐known professors collaborating with
PSU• Recruit international talents (faculty and students)
o Recruits talents from 3rd‐world countrieso Recruits talents from 3rd‐world countries.