psu world ranking analysis 2013...

22
PSU World Ranking Analysis 2013 2014 20132014 Perapong Tekasakul Perapong Tekasakul Vice President for Research System and Graduate Studies

Upload: others

Post on 31-Aug-2019

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

PSU World Ranking Analysis2013 20142013‐2014

Perapong TekasakulPerapong Tekasakul

Vice President for Research System and Graduate Studies

20142014

• The Times Higher Education BRICS & Emerging Economies Rankings 2014 powered by ThomsonEconomies Rankings 2014 powered by Thomson Reuters includes only institutions in countries classified as “emerging economies” by FTSEclassified as  emerging economies  by FTSE, including the “BRICS” nations of Brazil, Russia, India China and South AfricaIndia, China and South Africa. 

• The top universities ranking uses the same methodology as the Times Higher Educationmethodology as the Times Higher EducationWorld University Rankings.

I di tIndicators

Teaching: The learning environment (30%)

Research: Volume income reputation (30%)Research: Volume, income, reputation (30%)

Citations: Research influence (30%)

Industry income: Innovation (2.5%)

I t ti l tl k P l h (7 5%)International outlook: People, research (7.5%)

Thai and ASEAN Universities ranked

University Rank Overall Teaching International Outlook

Industry Income

Research Citations

100% 30% 7.5% 2.5% 30% 30%KMUTT 29 33.0 13.0 24.4 62.2 10.5 75.4MU 52 26.7 28.6 42.0 38.5 14.3 32.3CMU 82 21.0 19.7 32.4 30.4 10.0 29.6CU 85 20.3 22.8 29.8 38.0 15.5 19.0PSU 89 19.7 13.4 33.1 28.7 7.9 33.7

UniversitiKebangsaanMalaysiaMalaysia 77 22.3 22.5 49.8 29.3 11.5 25.6Universiti Putra Malaysia 95 18 21.4 32.1 32.8 12.3 15.6

Times Higher Education (THE) World University Ranking Indicators20132013

PSU ‐ v ‐ KMUTT

100Teaching (30%)

50Research (30%)International 

0

Research (30%)outlook (7.5%)

PSU

KMUTT

Citations (30%)Industry income (2.5%)

KMUTT

Indicators by CategoryAcademic staff / 

students

TEACHING INDICATORS

Indicators by Category50

100

Doctoral degrees awarded / d d t

Institutional income / 

0

undergraduate degrees awarded

/academic staff

PSU

Doctoral degrees awarded / 

academic staff

Teaching reputation

PSU

KMUTT

Papers / academic and reseach staff

RESEARCH&CITATIONS INDICATORS

A d i ff

INTERNATIONAL OUTLOOK INDICATORS

50

100

and reseach staff (normalized)

100

Academic staff ‐international / academic staff

0Research income / academic staff (normalized)

Normalized Citation Impact (country 

adjusted) 0

50PSU

KMUTT

Research reputation

PSU

KMUTT

Students ‐international / 

students

Papers ‐ international co‐author / papers

Indicators by SubjectTEACHING AND INSTITUTIONAL INDICATORS

100CH

Academic staff / students

100CH

Doctoral degrees awarded / academic staff

50 LSSS

PSU

50 LSSS

CH Cli i l li i l

0

PSAH

KMUTT 0

PSAH

PSU

KMUTT

CH Clinical, pre‐clinical & health

LS Life sciencesPS Physical sciencesET Engineering & 

ET ET

CH

Teaching reputation Institutional income / academic stafftechnology

AH Arts & humanitiesSS Social sciences

50

100CH

LSSS50

100CH

LSSS

0PSU

KMUTT 0PSU

KMUTT

PS

ET

AH PS

ET

AH

RESEARCH & CITATION IMPACT INDICATORS

Papers / academic and reseach staff R h i / d i t ff

100CH

Papers / academic and reseach staff

100CH

Research income / academic staff

0

50 LSSS

PSU

KMUTT0

50 LSSS

PSU

KMUTT

CH Clinical, pre‐clinical 

PSAH

KMUTT

PSAH

a , p e a& health

LS Life sciencesPS Physical sciencesET Engineering & 

technology

ETET

100CH

Research reputation Normalized Citation Impact (country adjusted)

technologyAH Arts & humanitiesSS Social sciences

50

100

LSSS

50

100CH

LSSS

0PSU

KMUTT 0

PSU

KMUTT

PS

ET

AH PS

ET

AH

INTERNATIONAL OUTLOOK INDICATORS

CH Clinical, pre‐clinical & health100

CH

Academic staff ‐ international / academic staff

LS Life sciencesPS Physical sciencesET Engineering & technology

50 LSSS

AH Arts & humanitiesSS Social sciences

0

PSAH

PSU

KMUTT

PS

ET

AH

100CH

Papers ‐ international co‐author / papers

50 LSSS

PSU

0

PSAH

PSU

KMUTT

PS

ET

AH

Score and Rank

) h iUniversities Name ASIAN Rank ASEAN Rank Country Rank

Ch l l k U i i 103 4 1

SCImago Institutional Ranking 2013

1) Thai Universities

Chulalongkorn University 103 4 1Mahidol University 116 7 2Chiang Mai University 218 11 3Kasetsart University 284 13 4Prince of Songkla University 300 14 5King Mongkut's University of Technology Thonburi 336 16 6Khon Kaen University 351 17 7King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang 385 19 8Siriraj Hospital 477 22 9Thammasat University 498 23 10Thammasat University 498 23 10Asian Institute of Technology 523 24 11Ramathibodi Hospital 630 28 12Suranaree University of Technology 666 32 13National Electronics and Computer Technology Center 763 40 14

h kh

2) Other Universities

Mahasarakham University 767 41 15Silpakorn University 804 49 16Srinakharinwirot University 842 51 17

2) Other UniversitiesUniversities Name ASIAN Rank ASEAN Rank Country Rank

National University of Singapore 15 1 1Nanyang Technological University 20 2 2Agency for Science, Technology and Research Singapore 52 3 3University of Malaya 104 5 1Science University of Malaysia 105 6 2Universiti Putra Malaysia 119 8 3National University of Malaysia 125 9 4University of Technology Malaysia 211 10 5National University Health System 280 12 4

SCImago Ranking Comparison by criteriaSCImago Ranking Comparison by criteria

U i iti NCriterias

SC1 SC2 SC3 SC4 SC5 SC6 SC7 SC8Universities Name SC1:Output 

SC2:IC(%)

SC3:Q1(%)

SC4:NI 

SC5:Spec. 

SC6:Exc(%) 

SC7:% Lead

SC8:EwL

Science University of Malaysia (USM) 6,754 31.63 22.59 0.83 0.65 9.33 78.53 7.45Mahidol University  6,217 42.87 43.80 1.01 0.65 9.85 54.99 3.15Universiti Putra Malaysia  6,179 24.92 16.64 0.62 0.67 5.86 74.27 4.02National University of Malaysia  5,911 17.93 13.42 0.69 0.63 7.08 71.05 4.65University of Technology Malaysia  3,573 28.13 13.74 0.82 0.74 9.65 70.86 6.88Chiang Mai University  3,469 42.35 36.67 1.03 0.63 9.01 60.82 4.00g y ,Kasetsart University  2,645 44.69 31.00 0.66 0.74 5.65 61.36 2.00Prince of Songkla University  2,552 41.54 32.80 0.88 0.72 7.62 65.40 4.20

Indicators

SC1 Output (O)

SC2 International Collaboration (IC)SC2 International Collaboration (IC)

SC3 High Quality Publication (Q1)

SC4 Normalized Impact (NI)SC4 Normalized Impact (NI)

SC5 Specialization Index (Spec.)

SC6 Excellence Rate (Exc.)SC6 Excellence Rate (Exc.)

SC7 Scientific Leadership (Lead)

Comparison of Universities by SCImago ranking indicators

Science University of Malaysia  (6) Mahidol University (7) Universiti Putra Malaysia  (8)

National University of  Malaysia  (9) University of Technology Malaysia  (10) Chiang Mai University (11)

Kasetsart University (13) PSU (14)

60 00

70.00

80.00SC1: Output (%)

y ( ) ( )

30.00

40.00

50.00

60.00SC2: IC(%)SC7: %Lead

0.00

10.00

20.00

SC3: Q1(%)SC6: Exc(%) 

SC4 NI(%)SC5 S SC4: NI(%)SC5: Spec. 

A National Research University

Benchmarking with USM: PSU Targets

SC1: Output (O) Increase 20% each year from PSU in the year 2013 

SC2: International Collaboration (%IC) Increase 10% each year from PSU in the year 2013 

7 000

8,000

9,000

SC1: Output

60.8260.00

70.00

SC2: IC(%)

2,5523,062 

3,674 

4,408 

5,290

3 000

4,000

5,000

6,000

7,000

USM

PSU

PSU(fc)

41.54

45.6950.26

55.29

30.00

40.00

50.00

USM

PSU

PSU(fc)2,552

0

1,000

2,000

3,000

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 20170.00

10.00

20.00

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017  

 

Detail: Total number of documents published in scholarly journals indexed in Scopus

Detail: Institution’s output ratio produced in collaboration with foreign institutions The values are computed by analyzing an institution’s outputScopus.  institutions. The values are computed by analyzing an institution s output whose affiliations include more than one country address. 

 

SC3: High Quality Publication (%Q1): Increase 20% each year from PSU in the year 2013 

SC4: Normalized Impact (NI): Increase 20% each year from PSU in the year 2013y y

48.0250 00

60.00

SC3: Q1(%)

1 17

1.281.20

1.40

SC4: NI

32.8036.08

39.68

43.66

30.00

40.00

50.00

USM

PSU

PSU(fc)

0.880.96

1.06

1.17

0.60

0.80

1.00

USM

PSU

PSU(f )

0.00

10.00

20.00

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

PSU(fc)

0.00

0.20

0.40

PSU(fc)

 

 

Detail: Ratio of publications that an institution publishes in the most fl l h l l l f h ld h k d h f l

Detail: The normalization of the citation values is done on an individual article l l h l ( ) h h l h b ’

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

influential scholarly journals of the world, those ranked in the first quartile (25%) in their categories as ordered by SCImago Journal Rank indicator. 

level. The values (in %) show the relationship between an institution’s average scientific impact and the world average set to a score of 1, ‐‐i.e. a NI score of 0.8 means the institution is cited 20% below world average and 1.3 means the institution is cited 30% above average. 

 

SC5: Specialization Index (Spec.)  Increase 20% each year from PSU in the year 2013 

SC6: Excellence Rate (%Exc.)  Increase 10% from USM in the Year 2016 

0.98

1.051.00

1.20

SC5: Spec.

9.5

11.22

10.00

12.00

SC6: Exc(%)

0.720.79

0.87

0.40

0.60

0.80

USM

PSU

PSU(fc)

7.628.00

8.60

4 00

6.00

8.00

USM

PSU

PSU(fc)

0.00

0.20

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 20170.00

2.00

4.00

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

 

 

Detail: The specialization Index indicates the extent of thematic concentration/dispersion of an institution’s scientific output. Values range 

Detail: Excellence rate indicates the amount (in %) of an institution’s scientific output that s included into the set of the 10% of the most cited papers in their 

between 0 to 1, indicating generalistic vs. specialized institutions respectively. This indicator is computed according to the Gini Index used in Economy. 

respective scientific fields. It is a measure of high quality fields. It is a measure of high quality output of reasearch institutions. 

 

SC7: Scientific Leadership (%Lead)  Increase 10% from USM in the  SC8: Excellence with Leadership (%EwL.) Increase 10% from USM in Year 2016  the Year 2016 

93.3390 00

100.00

SC7: %Lead12.00

SC8: %EwL.

65.4069.60 

77.90 

87.40 

50.00

60.00

70.00

80.00

90.00

USM

PSU

6.70

8.65

10.04

6.00

8.00

10.00

USM

PSU

0 00

10.00

20.00

30.00

40.00PSU

PSU(fc)4.20

5.20

2.00

4.00

PSU

PSU(fc)

 

Detail: Leadership indicates and institution’s “output as main countributor”, that is the number of papers in which the corresponding author belongs to the i tit ti

Detail: Excellence with Leadership indicates the amount of documents in the Excellence rate in which the institution is the main contributor. 

0.002008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

0.002008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

institution.

 

PSU Performance AnalysisPSU Performance Analysis& Approachespp

Strength and WeaknessStrength•Strong focus of research•High quality research (impact factors & citations) •Strong international collaborationHi h f t ff i•High performance staff in some areas

•Variety of disciplines

Weakness•Low research output (quantity)Low research output (quantity)•Low number of international faculty and students•Low number of student exchange (inbound/outbound)•Relatively unrecognizable in an international level•Low number of Ph.D. students •Low teaching quality (student/faculty ratio)•Low teaching quality (student/faculty ratio)•Low industry income

ApproachesCampaign PackageCampaign Package

“Top 10 in ASEAN on 50th Anniversary – Feet on the ground heads in the cloud”

• Declare a “Research Week” when everyone stops other works but write a paper• Create culture for research by aiming at quality 

ground, heads in the cloud

o Transfer focus to every faculty including individual dialogo Redesign the evaluation and rewarding system, and measure output and 

productivity based on publications, research grants and student training for individual. Be SPECIFIC rather than broad

o Set up personal research account for awarding money• Increase international research collaboration with outstanding universities (inside 

d t id )and outside)o Support research collaboration with top institutes to increase high‐quality 

publicationo Appoint Honorary Professors from well known professors collaborating witho Appoint Honorary Professors from well‐known professors collaborating with 

PSU• Recruit international talents (faculty and students)

o Recruits talents from 3rd‐world countrieso Recruits talents from 3rd‐world countries.

Thank You