protein engineering to solve problems at nanoscale

16
Protein Engineering to Solve Problems at Nanoscale S.C. Lee Department of Biomedical Engineering Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering Ohio State University, Columbus OH Dorothy M. Davis Heart and Lung Research Center Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus OH

Upload: chester-welch

Post on 06-Jan-2018

217 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

Background… To make a clinically useful MIG sensor: Streptavidin Concept of FET protein sensing Erroneous classical model (Schoning and Poghassian, 2002) Reality of bioHFET protein sensing (Gupta et al., 2008) To make a clinically useful MIG sensor: -Increase sensitivity 200X (Currently at 10-30nM) -Identify anti-MIG antibody fragments

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Protein Engineering to Solve Problems at Nanoscale

Protein Engineering to Solve Problems at Nanoscale

S.C. Lee

Department of Biomedical EngineeringDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering

Ohio State University, Columbus OH

Dorothy M. Davis Heart and Lung Research CenterOhio State University Medical Center, Columbus OH

Page 2: Protein Engineering to Solve Problems at Nanoscale

Background…

Concept of FET protein sensing Erroneous classical model (Schoning and Poghassian,2002)

Reality of bioHFET protein sensing (Gupta et al., 2008)

To make a clinically useful MIG sensor: -Increase sensitivity 200X (Currently at 10-30nM)-Identify anti-MIG antibody fragments

MIG

Streptavidin

Page 3: Protein Engineering to Solve Problems at Nanoscale

HFET signal is inversely related to salt concentration…

(Schoning and Poghassian,2002)

(Shapiro et al., 2007, Gupta et al. 2008, Wen et al., submitted)

…so there is a sensitivity issue related to a nanoscale parameter, addressable with protein engineering…

Page 4: Protein Engineering to Solve Problems at Nanoscale

Optimization opportunities…

Receptor -Size -Topology -Epitope specificity

Analyte -Size, conformation -Charge density -Charge distribution -Epitope distribution

FET -Composition -Dielectric -Gate bias -Surface chemistry

Polymer film -Thickness -Composition -Uniformity -Durability

Page 5: Protein Engineering to Solve Problems at Nanoscale

Clinical relevance of sensing MIG…

• CXCL9 (or MIG) is a chemokine, involved in inflammatory processes – Made by monocyte/macrophages– Chemoattractant for T-lymphocytes

• Positively correlated with transplant rejection• Normal concentration: 40-100 pM• Disease concentration: as high as 34 nM• Highly positively charged protein

~Net 20 positive charges per molecule at pH 7.4

Page 6: Protein Engineering to Solve Problems at Nanoscale

Antibody Fragments…

• scFv: one VariableHeavy (VH) and Variable Light (VL) chain

12 nm 3-4 nm

scFv

Page 7: Protein Engineering to Solve Problems at Nanoscale

Phage Display for anti-MIG Phage Display for anti-MIG abab

yfpyfpyfgyfg

yfg-Your Favorite Geneyfg-Your Favorite Gene

yfp-Your Favorite Proteinyfp-Your Favorite Protein

•Phage display links variant gene to the protein it specifies

–Libraries screened by affinity–1011 variants/screen

Identify unique sequences from each

round of selection and express

Incubation with biotinylated-MIG—varying Concentrations

Elution of phage

Phage titer and amplification

Repeat 4-6 times

Use of solid support system to display MIG to phage

Page 8: Protein Engineering to Solve Problems at Nanoscale

Phage Enrichment

5 x 104

5 x 106

1 x 107

1 x 105

Round of SelectionI II III IV

Round [MIG]

I 40 nM

II 1 nM

III 1 nM

IV 1 nM

Page 9: Protein Engineering to Solve Problems at Nanoscale

Chemoselective scFv conjugation…

…orients scFvs…

Parent Mutant

P M M

Electrophile Nucleophile

Page 10: Protein Engineering to Solve Problems at Nanoscale

N-end specific oxidation of ser-terminated proteins…

Unoxidized

Aldehyde-terminated(oxidized)

Aldehyde-terminated(oxidized)

Unoxidized

Intact Trypsin digested

SAMSAM

Electrophile Nucleophile

Eteshola et al., 2006, 2007, Shapiro et al., 2007

Lee et al., 2004

Page 11: Protein Engineering to Solve Problems at Nanoscale

Differential epitope recognition…

MIG+

-

E2

E1

a

Anti-E2

MIG -+

E1

Anti-E1-

MIG+ E2

-

c

Anti-E2

b

SABio

HRP

MIG+

-Anti-E1

vs

..with chemoselectively orientedscFvs…

Page 12: Protein Engineering to Solve Problems at Nanoscale

MIG structure and charge distribution….

3-4 nm

MIG

2.5-3 nm

White-NeutralBlue-PositiveRed-Negative

…makes differential epitope recognition a way to tune charge-surface distance…

Page 13: Protein Engineering to Solve Problems at Nanoscale

Changing receptor topography: Scanning circular permutagenesis…

Eteshola et al., 2006, 2007

Page 14: Protein Engineering to Solve Problems at Nanoscale

Improving the polymeric film…

Bhushan et al., 2009

Ideal APTES Real APTES

APDMES

Thinner, non-crosslinked film… -Better sensitivity -Saturates (biochemically) at lower analyte concentration -Smoother -More mechanically robust

Page 15: Protein Engineering to Solve Problems at Nanoscale

Summary• The classical planar immunoFET analysis is inaccurate

– The flaws are conceptual: the model can’t be redeemed – Data from MIG detecting HFETs contradict the model– Distance between bound charges and sensing surface is

critical to magnitude of response• Protein engineering and bioconjugate chemistry can address

nanoscale issues – Modulating receptor topography (CP) can modulate the

critical distance– Epitope recognition specificity influences the critical

distance– The critical distance can be modulated by careful “SAM”

selection and construction

Page 16: Protein Engineering to Solve Problems at Nanoscale

AcknowledgementsSurface Functionalization:Theo Nicholson IIISamit K. GuptaEdward EtesholaJohn P. ShapiroMark EliasMatt KeenerAlGaN Fabrication/Characterization:Wu LuLeonard BrillsonXuejin Wen

Surface Characterization:Bharat BhushanKwang Joo KwakDharma Tokachichu

Funds:National Science FoundationDepartment of Homeland Security