protectionism and the global recession chris milner school of economics and gep university of...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Protectionism and the Global Recession Chris Milner School of Economics and GEP University of Nottingham GEP Schools Conference 21 st June, 2010](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070305/5515d072550346dd6f8b45e0/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Protectionism and the Global Recession
Chris Milner
School of Economics and GEP
University of Nottingham
GEP School’s Conference
21st June, 2010
![Page 2: Protectionism and the Global Recession Chris Milner School of Economics and GEP University of Nottingham GEP Schools Conference 21 st June, 2010](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070305/5515d072550346dd6f8b45e0/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Introduction
• A ‘Buy American’ clause in US economic recovery package proposed by President Obama raised fears that the world would revert to protectionist measures in response to the current world recession– only US iron and steel to be used in projects
funded by the package– fear of a return to the trade policy responses
witnessed during the Great Depression of the 1930s
![Page 3: Protectionism and the Global Recession Chris Milner School of Economics and GEP University of Nottingham GEP Schools Conference 21 st June, 2010](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070305/5515d072550346dd6f8b45e0/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Introduction (cont)• Fears of domino and retaliation measures
across large number of other countries in response to domestic political pressures to limit unemployment at home– increasing number of sector aid packages, greater
incidence of anti-dumping measures and more buy national programmes around world
– our own previous Prime Minister warned against US bailing out struggling automakers, but also promised British jobs for British workers!
• But danger that jobs protected by restricting imports would be at the expense of job losses (possibly even greater losses) in export sectors– ‘An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind’
(Mahatma Gandhi) !
![Page 4: Protectionism and the Global Recession Chris Milner School of Economics and GEP University of Nottingham GEP Schools Conference 21 st June, 2010](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070305/5515d072550346dd6f8b45e0/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
![Page 5: Protectionism and the Global Recession Chris Milner School of Economics and GEP University of Nottingham GEP Schools Conference 21 st June, 2010](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070305/5515d072550346dd6f8b45e0/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act
• This Act of June 1930 raised US tariffs to historically high levels– originally intended to help US farmers against
imports driven up by post - World War I overproduction of agricultural goods
– the upward revision of tariffs extended across other sectors as special interest groups lobbied Congress during the Bill’s passage in to legislation
![Page 6: Protectionism and the Global Recession Chris Milner School of Economics and GEP University of Nottingham GEP Schools Conference 21 st June, 2010](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070305/5515d072550346dd6f8b45e0/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
US Tariff Rates (selected articles), 1921 and 1930
Article 1921 1930
Raw sugar 1.25 cents/lb 2.5 cents/lb
Cattle free 3 cents/lb
Milk free 6.5 cents/gallon
Cream free 56.6 cents/gallon
Butter 2.5 cents/lb 14 cents/lb
Pig iron free $1.125/ton
Cotton free 7 cents/lb
Wool free 34 cents/lb
Source: Abraham Berglund, "The Tariff Act of 1930", American Economic Review 20 [Sept. 1930]
![Page 7: Protectionism and the Global Recession Chris Milner School of Economics and GEP University of Nottingham GEP Schools Conference 21 st June, 2010](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070305/5515d072550346dd6f8b45e0/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Trade Collapse of 1930s
• By 1933 US imports had fallen to less than one-third of their 1929 level– but US exports also fell by 69% over this same period– in 1933 one in every 4 American workers was out of a job
• Overall international trade also fell by about 66% between 1929 and 1934– unemployment rates ranged from 15% to 25% around the world
• The trade collapse was not due to trade policy alone (some would argue it was a relatively small contributory factor)– but the consensus view is that protectionism was not a desirable
(certainly not optimal) component of a policy response to depressed demand conditions
![Page 8: Protectionism and the Global Recession Chris Milner School of Economics and GEP University of Nottingham GEP Schools Conference 21 st June, 2010](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070305/5515d072550346dd6f8b45e0/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
![Page 9: Protectionism and the Global Recession Chris Milner School of Economics and GEP University of Nottingham GEP Schools Conference 21 st June, 2010](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070305/5515d072550346dd6f8b45e0/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Recent Trends in TradeWorld Merchandise Exports as a % of
GDP1820 1.0
1870 4.6
1913 7.9
1929 9.0
1950 5.5
1973 10.5
1998 17.2
2005 22.7 (28.1 incl Services)
![Page 10: Protectionism and the Global Recession Chris Milner School of Economics and GEP University of Nottingham GEP Schools Conference 21 st June, 2010](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070305/5515d072550346dd6f8b45e0/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Theoretical Arguments for Protection?
• First best– none for ‘small’ countries, and limited number of
cases where international market power present (through country size or international oligopoly in specific sector)
• Second best– where other objectives could be satisfied or market
distortions could be remedied by other (more appropriate/less costly) policy measures
• Non-arguments– eg cheap labour used by foreign producers
![Page 11: Protectionism and the Global Recession Chris Milner School of Economics and GEP University of Nottingham GEP Schools Conference 21 st June, 2010](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070305/5515d072550346dd6f8b45e0/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
![Page 12: Protectionism and the Global Recession Chris Milner School of Economics and GEP University of Nottingham GEP Schools Conference 21 st June, 2010](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070305/5515d072550346dd6f8b45e0/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Welfare Effects of a Tariff (‘small country case’)
• Redistributions– from consumers to producers– from consumers to government/tax authority
• Net loses – production loss (from protection of inefficient
domestic producers)– consumption loss ( from import restriction)
![Page 13: Protectionism and the Global Recession Chris Milner School of Economics and GEP University of Nottingham GEP Schools Conference 21 st June, 2010](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070305/5515d072550346dd6f8b45e0/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Trade Policy Lobbying?
• Pressures for protection– relative power of
producer and consumer groups
– unions and labour-intensive sectors
– constraints on use of other policy instruments
– retaliation
• Pressures for liberalisation– institutions and
negotiations at regional (eg EU) and international level ( eg WTO)
– at national level• growth of consumerism
• influence of multinational corporations
• external pressure (eg World Bank on developing countries)
![Page 14: Protectionism and the Global Recession Chris Milner School of Economics and GEP University of Nottingham GEP Schools Conference 21 st June, 2010](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070305/5515d072550346dd6f8b45e0/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Assessment (1): Limited Prospects for Protectionism
• Some economists/commentators advocate intelligent use of trade policy to manage adjustment costs of recession, but weight of evidence and theory that countries should try to avoid repeat of trade policy mistakes of last major depression
• Limited by:– experience ..’that erecting obstacles to trade will
make things worse.’ (Pascal Lamy, Director General, WTO)
– international institutions (WTO, EU etc)– greater costs of protection and threat of export losses
due to greater openness and interdependence now (e.g. international supply chains)
– also more difficult to implement buy national policies now!
![Page 15: Protectionism and the Global Recession Chris Milner School of Economics and GEP University of Nottingham GEP Schools Conference 21 st June, 2010](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070305/5515d072550346dd6f8b45e0/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Barbie Doll Feenstra and Taylor (2008 Worth Publishers)
![Page 16: Protectionism and the Global Recession Chris Milner School of Economics and GEP University of Nottingham GEP Schools Conference 21 st June, 2010](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070305/5515d072550346dd6f8b45e0/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Assessment (2): Limited Immediate Prospects for Multilateralism
• WTO members have been negotiating a further Round (‘the Doha Round’)of multilateral trade reforms since 2001, but prospects for agreement still poor:– complex agenda– many WTO member states– new powers at the table (China, India, Brazil)– growth of regional trade agreements– recession!