prospects for a pan-european rail network in the post-liberalization...
TRANSCRIPT
Innovative Logistics Consultancy �
Solutions for Your Success
Prospects for a Pan-European Rail Network in the Post-Liberalization World
London, 27th October 2009
© TransCare AG 2
Prospects for a Pan-European Rail Network in the Post-Liberalization World
1. Introduction
2. Status Quo of European Railways
3. Implications of Rail Liberalization and Mergers by Former State Railways in Coal Transport
4. New Players in the Overland Freight Landscape
5. Rail Network Capability to Handle Forecasted Volumes
6. Rail as a Competitor to Deep Sea Transport
Contents
© TransCare AG 3
TransCare Key Facts
1. Introduction
� Management Consultancy for Logistics and Transportation
- Founded 1993 (50 international experts)
� Locations
- Wiesbaden (GER, headquarter), Moscow (RU), New Delhi (IN), Madrid (ES)
� Business Areas
- International management and strategy consulting
- International multimodal transportation, logistics and infrastructure consulting
- Optimisation and strategic reorientation of logistics networks
� Approach
- Increasing efficiency in logistics process chains and reduction of logistic costs
� Client Portfolio
- Shippers, logistics and rail service providers
- Seaports, terminal and logistic park operators
- National transport ministries
© TransCare AG 4
� Consultancy with engineering and economic know-how
- Thought through and cost sensitive solutions
� Integration of transport mode, warehouse, organisation and IT
- Integrated optimisation of your company�s logistics
� Innovative concepts with pragmatic implementation
- Short term success with long term effects
� Full service consultancy from the concept to the implementation
- Competent support out of one hand
� In-depth specialist knowledge, across-the-border experience and the motivation �to get stuck in�
- Neutral concepts and assertive personalities
TransCare Achievements
1. Introduction
© TransCare AG 55
TransCare Service Portfolio
� Transportation network strategies (Rail/Road)
� Rail integration intoindustrial logistics
� Planning, optimisation and calculation of complex transport systems
� Modular layout planning for ports, intermodal terminals and logistics parks
� Planning and optimisation of operative processes
� Investment calculation and business plans
� Tender activities for operation and transshipment technologies
� Operator concepts
Transport Logistics/Infrastructure Planning
Management Consulting Logistics Network Optimization
� Evaluation of network structures
� Analysis of currenttransport flows
� Evaluation of currentnetwork costs
� Development of network structure and transport flows graphical models
� Development of anew cost structures
� Process optimization
� Detailed implementation plans/support during implementation
� Success measurement
� Company strategy development
� Business plan development
� Service portfolio strategy
� Commercial due diligence
� M&A support
� Market and competitoranalysis
� Market entry strategy
� Change management
� Research and studies
1. Introduction
© TransCare AG 66
TransCare References - Abstract
Management Consulting Logistics Network Optimization
Transport Logistics/Infrastructure Planning
1. Introduction
© TransCare AG 7
Full Cost Structures for Steam Coal Deliveries to ARA 2007in US dollars/t
1. Introduction
With the average share of logistics costs of >60 % in 2007 coal business is �mainly� a logistics and transportation issue
54 % 76 % 64 % 66 % 59 % 63 %
Source: Global Insight, London 2008
x % Share logistics costsas of total
Other Mine Costs
Wages
Royalties / Levies
Profit & ROC
Port & Rail Costs
Average Sea Freight Rates
© TransCare AG 8
Prospects for a Pan-European Rail Network in the Post-Liberalization World
Contents
1. Introduction
2. Status Quo of European Railways
3. Implications of Rail Liberalization and Mergers by Former State Railways in Coal Transport
4. New Players in the Overland Freight Landscape
5. Rail Network Capability to Handle Forecasted Volumes
6. Rail as a Competitor to Deep Sea Transport
© TransCare AG 9
in bln. tkm(1) FOC = all Freight Operators in UK (without DB Schenker Rail (UK) Ltd)Source: TransCare based on annual reports
� The European rail market is still domi-nated by the former state railway compa-nies (see graph).
� Besides former state railway companies, private carriers have established their business (e.g. CTL Logistics, Freightliner).
� There are also niche players concentrating on special goods (HHPI), corridors (SBB Cargo) or industrial rail companies (VPS).
2. Status Quo of European Railways
Top Railway Companies in Europe 2008
© TransCare AG 10
Decline of European Railway Freight Volume
Loss of volume2009 vs. 2008
>40%
20% - 40%0% - 19%n.a.
2. Status Quo of European Railways
All major European Railways were hit hard by the economic downturn � even harder than other modes of transport
© TransCare AG 11
Headlines from European Rail Companies 2009
2. Status Quo of European Railways
Major European Railways did not establish �breathing production systems� that can cope with decreasing volumes and therefore suffer from extremely dropping profits
© TransCare AG 12
Prospects for a Pan-European Rail Network in the Post-Liberalization World
Contents
1. Introduction
2. Status Quo of European Railways
3. Implications of Rail Liberalization and Mergers by Former State Railways in Coal Transport
4. New Players in the Overland Freight Landscape
5. Rail Network Capability to Handle Forecasted Volumes
6. Rail as a Competitor to Deep Sea Transport
© TransCare AG 13
Source: IBM Global Business Services, Rail Liberalisation Index 2007
Advanced
On Schedule
Delayed
Rail Liberalisation Index 2007
In most countries external railway carriers are already licensed and involved in freight transport.
The liberalisation is advanced in Great Britain, Germany, Sweden and the Netherlands.
The market opening in Luxembourg, France, Greece and Ireland is delayed.
All the countries examined have been gradually opening their rail markets since the last survey in 2004.
3. Implications of Rail Liberalisation�
© TransCare AG 14
The German ExperienceTraffic Performance in Rail Transport in Germany (in bln tkm)
CAGR 2003-2008: 32,9 %
CAGR 2003-2008: 2,9 %
CAGR 2003-2008 total: 6,3 %
3. Implications of Rail Liberalisation�
79,2 83,1 81,789,5 92,1 91,2
5,98,8 13,7
17,522,5 24,5
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
Liberalization causes a new market situation�
private rail carriers
Deutsche Bahn Group
Source: TransCare based on Deutsche Bahn Competition Report
© TransCare AG 15
The German ExperienceDevelopment of Deutsche Bahn Group Average Price Level (in �-ct/tkm)
3. Implications of Rail Liberalisation�
�with decreasing prices and�
3,50
3,70
3,90
4,10
4,30
4,50
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
nominal
real
-13,69%
+5,34%
Source: TransCare based on Deutsche Bahn Annual Reports 2003-2008
© TransCare AG 16
The German ExperienceDevelopment Productivity at Deutsche Bahn Group (in EUR/Capita)
3. Implications of Rail Liberalisation�
�the challenge to increase productivity
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
+26,62%
Source: TransCare based on Deutsche Bahn Annual Reports 2003-2008
© TransCare AG 17
The German ExperienceDB Schenker European Rail Network
3. Implications of Rail Liberalisation�
Fierce competition in the home market forced DB Schenker to establish a pan-European network � First in market!
own assetscooperation
© TransCare AG 18
Main Mergers & Acquisitions in European Railway Market
3. Implications of Rail Liberalisation�
5 l
Year
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
Revenues per year [in mln EUR]
500
110 l; 2,000 w
42 l; 450 w
34 l
176 l; 4,828 w
110 l; 2,300 w
35 l; 845 w
BuyerBought companyLocos/wagons
2009
400 l; 7,700 w
157 l; 1,750 w40 l
500 l; 14,000 w
13,000 w
22 l
7,800 w
18 l
100 l; 2,500 w
90 l
© TransCare AG 19
European Rail Market Development 1995 - Today
3. Implications of Rail Liberalisation�
Rail transportation in Europe is developing from national monopolies towards an European oligopoly � hopefully!
1995 2000 2005 Today
Monopoly � only state railways
Initiation of private railways
Development of an oligopoly?
© TransCare AG 20
Prospects for a Pan-European Rail Network in the Post-Liberalization World
Contents
1. Introduction
2. Status Quo of European Railways
3. Implications of Rail Liberalization and Mergers by Former State Railways in Coal Transport
4. New Players in the Overland Freight Landscape
5. Rail Network Capability to Handle Forecasted Volumes
6. Rail as a Competitor to Deep Sea Transport
© TransCare AG 21
Private Rail Companies Involved in Coal Transportation
4. New Players in the Overland Freight Landscape
Chances of private rail companies will be significantly more in market niches than in developing own pan-european networks
© TransCare AG 22
Pros & Cons of Private Rail Companies for Clients
4. New Players in the Overland Freight Landscape
Pros Cons
New assets (mainly from rolling stock leasing companies)
Focus on niche markets and cost leadership by optimized asset utilization
Higher service quality
Greater independence from incumbents
Critical size
No full coverage of all requested services
Less flexibility
Necessity of clients´commitments (long-term contracts, fixed volumes)
© TransCare AG 23
Activity Based Costing in Rail Transportation
4. New Players in the Overland Freight Landscape
� As rail transportation and its pricing is not yet transparent based on full competition, tools to judge pricing are needed
� If a power utility or a coal trader wants to transport coal from/into the hinterland he will ask rail companies to get a freight rate, but several questions remain �unanswered�:
How do rail companies calculate their costs?
Is this a fair price?
What can be done to reduce cost of the rail company and therefore price from client´s side?
� Example how to calculate rail transportation:
Rotterdam - Neunkirchen
© TransCare AG 24
Prospects for a pan-European rail network in a post liberalisationworld
Contents
1. Introduction
2. Status Quo of European Railways
3. Implications of Rail Liberalization and Mergers by Former State Railways in Coal Transport
4. New Players in the Overland Freight Landscape
5. Rail Network Capability to Handle Forecasted Volumes
6. Rail as a Competitor to Deep Sea Transport
© TransCare AG
The rail network bottlenecks are in the hinterland connections of the large European ports where the increasing import coal volumes will be handled in the future
25
Railway Network - Capacities
Rail network capacity is limited because of the following factors:
� Different priorities (passenger and freight)
� Different train lengths and weights
� Different speed limits
� Restrictions in selection of stations for stops
Electrified
Diesel
scale = 20 million t/mm
5. Rail Network Capacity
© TransCare AG 26
Train Length and Weight
Max. train weight [t]
Max. trainlength [m]
Upgradelocomotive
Expand train length
4.500
1.050
1
3
2
Increaseaxle load
Restrictions
1 Limited by loco power, brakes, etc.
2 Limited by infra-structure (signalling, passing lanes, etc.)
3 Limited by axle load
useable non-useable optimization approach
Optimisation of train length and weight requires high investments and cannot be done in short term period
5. Rail Network Capacity
© TransCare AG 27
Capacity Utilization
Max. train weight [t]
Max. trainlength [m]
0 %
20 %
40 %
60 %
80 %
100 %
0 % 20 % 40 % 60 % 80 % 100 %
Capacity utilization optimization can be done without any or with small investments
5. Rail Network Capacity
© TransCare AG 28
Prospects for a pan-European rail network in a post liberalisationworld
Contents
1. Introduction
2. Status Quo of European Railways
3. Implications of Rail Liberalization and Mergers by Former State Railways in Coal Transport
4. New Players in the Overland Freight Landscape
5. Rail Network Capability to Handle Forecasted Volumes
6. Rail as a Competitor to Deep Sea Transport
© TransCare AG
Rail transport could connect Atlantic and Pacific trading markets, but can only be competitive at times of high seaborne freight rates
29
Landbridge China/Russia � Europe
16 days
26 days
rail transport along the Transsib deep-sea transportation
� Rail transport from China/Russia to Europe reduces transit times by up to 40 % compared to sea transport
� The Russian Federation plans huge investments for the improvement of Transsib infrastructure
6. Rail as Competitor to Deep Sea Transport
© TransCare AG 30
Seaborne Freight Rates
6. Rail as Competitor to Deep Sea Transport
Annualchange
200-days-average
Average since 1995
Baltic-Dry-Indexin points
Seaborne freight rates have been extremely volatile since 1995, but rail transport needs long term thinking and stable price levels
Competive price levelof rail transport
© TransCare AG 31
Thank You for Your Attention