proposed subdivision – the bower stage 9 site classification€¦ · proposed subdivision – the...
TRANSCRIPT
GEOTECHNICAL I LABORATORY I EARTHWORKS I QUARRY I CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL TESTING
Proposed Subdivision – The Bower Stage 9 Site Classification
Carolina Road, Medowie
NEW15P-0033K-AA 6 May 2020
Qualtest Laboratory (NSW) Pty Ltd ABN: 98 153 268 89 8 Ironbark Close Warabrook NSW 2304 T: (02) 4968 4468 F: (02)4960 9775 W: www.qualtest.com.au NEW15P-0033K-AA
6 May 2020
McCloy Development Management Pty Ltd
Suite 2, Ground Floor, 317 Hunter Street
NEWCASTLE NSW 2300
Attention: Mr Rylan Gibson
Dear Rylan
RE: PROPOSED SUBDIVISION – THE BOWER STAGE 9
CAROLINA ROAD, MEDOWIE
SITE CLASSIFICATION
Please find enclosed our geotechnical report for Stage 9 of ‘The Bower’ residential subdivision,
located at Carolina Road, Medowie.
The report includes recommendations for Site Classification in accordance with AS2870-2011,
“Residential Slabs and Footings”, for Stage 9 (Lots 901 to 934).
If you have any questions regarding this report, please do not hesitate to contact Ben Edwards,
Shannon Kelly, or the undersigned.
For and on behalf of Qualtest Laboratory (NSW) Pty Ltd
Jason Lee
Principal Geotechnical Engineer
PROPOSED SUBDIVISION – THE BOWER STAGE 9 – CAROLINA ROAD, MEDOWIE
6 May 2020 i NEW15P-0033K-AA
Table of Contents:
1.0 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 1
2.0 Desktop Study .............................................................................................................. 1
3.0 Field Work ...................................................................................................................... 1
4.0 Site Description ............................................................................................................ 2
4.1 Site Regrade Works ......................................................................................................2
4.2 Surface Conditions ......................................................................................................3
4.3 Subsurface Conditions ................................................................................................4
5.0 Laboratory Testing ...................................................................................................... 8
6.0 Site Classification to AS2870-2011 ........................................................................... 9
7.0 Limitations .................................................................................................................... 10
Attachments:
Figure AA1: Site Plan and Approximate Test Locations
Appendix A: Results of Field Investigations
Appendix B: Results of Laboratory Testing
Appendix C: CSIRO Sheet BTF 18
PROPOSED SUBDIVISION – THE BOWER STAGE 9 – CAROLINA ROAD, MEDOWIE
6 May 2020 1 NEW15P-0033K-AA
1.0 Introduction
Qualtest Laboratory NSW Pty Ltd (Qualtest) is pleased to present this geotechnical assessment
report on behalf of McCloy Development Management Pty Ltd (McCloy), for “The Bower”
residential subdivision, Stage 9, located at Coralina Road, Medowie.
Based on the brief and plans provided in your email dated 4 February 2020, Stage 9 is
understood to include 34 residential lots (Lots 901 to 934).
The scope of work for the geotechnical investigation included providing Site Classification in
accordance with AS2870-2011, “Residential Slabs and Footings”, following completion of site
regrade works.
This report presents the results of the field work investigations and laboratory testing, and
provides recommendations for the scope outlined above.
The report also includes selected results from the previous geotechnical assessments carried
out for The Bower subdivision by Qualtest (Refer to Section 2.0), to supplement information
collected during the current investigation where applicable.
2.0 Desktop Study
The scope of work has included a review of the following reports by Qualtest, for areas either
within or adjacent to the current study area:
Preliminary Geotechnical report, ‘Proposed Subdivision – The Bower Stages 7 to 11,
Boundary Road, Medowie, (Report Reference: NEW18P-0102-AA, dated 15 August 2018);
Geotechnical Assessment report ‘Proposed Subdivision – The Bower Stage 7, Boundary
Road Medowie’ (Report Reference: NEW15P-0033F-AB, dated 22 November 2019); and,
Level 1 Site Re-grade Assessment Report, ‘Proposed Subdivision – The Bower Stage 9,
Carolina Road, Medowie”, (Report Reference: NEW19P-0123-AA, dated 14 February 2020).
This report includes selected results from the reports referenced above, to supplement
information collected during the current investigations where applicable. Reference should be
made to the reports outlined above for further details of site conditions, field work and
laboratory testing conducted, site supervision and density testing carried out.
3.0 Field Work
The field work investigations were carried out on 16 and 17 April 2020, and comprised of:
DBYD search was undertaken to check proposed test locations for the presence of
underground services;
Site walkover to make observations of surface features at the property and in the
immediate surrounding area;
Excavation of 19 test pits (TP901A to TP919A) using a 2.7 tonne rubber tracked excavator
equipped with a 450mm wide bucket to depths of between 0.60m to 2.10m;
Undisturbed samples (U50 tubes) and small bag samples were taken for subsequent
laboratory testing; and,
Test pits were backfilled with the excavation spoil and compacted using the excavator
bucket and tracks.
PROPOSED SUBDIVISION – THE BOWER STAGE 9 – CAROLINA ROAD, MEDOWIE
6 May 2020 2 NEW15P-0033K-AA
Investigations were carried out by an experienced Geotechnical Engineer from Qualtest who
located the test pits, carried out the testing and sampling, produced field logs of the test pits,
and made observations of the site surface conditions.
Engineering logs of the test pits are presented in Appendix A.
Approximate test pit locations are shown on the attached Figure AA1. Test pits were located in
the field by handheld GPS and relative to existing site features including topographic features,
lot boundaries and existing developments.
4.0 Site Description
4.1 Site Regrade Works
Initial site re-grading works were conducted between 30 July 2019 and 28 August 2019 during
the bulk earthworks undertaken for Stages 7 and 11A. Further works were performed between
11 December 2019 and 14 January 2020, consisting of the filling of proposed residential lots
within Stage 9, along with small portions of a lot within Stage 8 (Lot 817), and lots within Stage
10 (Lot 1001 to 1003).
Prior to filling, re-grade areas were stripped of topsoil and unsuitable material to expose a
suitable natural residual foundation profile. Re-grade works then consisted of filling with
approved site fill to finish design levels.
Filling was performed using site stockpiled material won from excavations cut from around the
site. The fill material could generally be described as mixtures of Sandy CLAY / Silty CLAY,
medium to high plasticity, fine to coarse grained sand, and with some fine to coarse grained
gravel inclusions.
The approximate depth of fill placed over the majority of lots ranged in the order of:
0.6m to 3.1m on Lots 909 to 919;
0.6m to 1.6m on Lots 920 to 923;
1.2m to 1.5m on Lots 924 to 929;
0.6m to 1.2m on Lots 930 to 934.
The fill was compacted in maximum lifts of 0.3m thickness. Any unsuitable or deleterious
material within the fill was removed by hand or mechanical means prior to final compaction of
the material.
As the geotechnical testing authority engaged for the project, Qualtest state that the filling
performed for the re-grade area within Stage 9 (as noted above and shown on Figure AA1 of
the Level 1 Site Re-grade Assessment Report), was carried out to Level 1 criteria as defined in
Clause 8.2 – Section 8, of AS3798-2007, “Guidelines on Earthworks for Commercial and
Residential Developments”. Refer to site regrade letter referenced in Section 2.0 for further
details.
At the time of the field investigations on 17 April 2020, fill stockpiles were still present on a
number of lots. During a site visit by a Geotechnical Engineer on 5 May 2019, it was observed
that most stockpiles had been removed following the field work. It is understood and
expected that the remaining stockpiles will be removed prior to development on the lots.
PROPOSED SUBDIVISION – THE BOWER STAGE 9 – CAROLINA ROAD, MEDOWIE
6 May 2020 3 NEW15P-0033K-AA
The recommendations of this report are based on our understanding of lot re grade works from
the Level 1 fill supervision by Qualtest, and placement of low reactivity topsoil material such
that total depth of topsoil and uncontrolled fill does not exceed 0.4m. Qualtest should be
informed without delay if additional earthworks are known to have been carried out.
4.2 Surface Conditions
The site of Stage 9 is located at Carolina Road, off Boundary Road, Medowie, as shown in
Figure AA1. The site is generally bounded by Stage 7 to the southeast, Stage 8 to the
southwest, future Stage 10 to the west, by an existing detention basin to the northwest, and by
existing bushland to the northeast.
At the time of the site investigation, trafficability by way of 4WD vehicle was good.
Based on observations on the day of the investigation which was carried out during a period of
fine weather following some rainfall, the site was judged to generally be moderately drained
primarily by way of surface runoff.
Selected photographs of the site taken on the day of the site investigation are shown below.
Photograph 1: Facing northwest from near
TP902A.
Photograph 2: Facing north from near TP902A.
Photograph 3: Facing northeast from near
TP903A. Stockpiles visible in background on
lots 912 to 916.
Photograph 4: Facing east from near TP903A.
Topsoil stockpile visible in background on Lots
902 and 903.
PROPOSED SUBDIVISION – THE BOWER STAGE 9 – CAROLINA ROAD, MEDOWIE
6 May 2020 4 NEW15P-0033K-AA
Photograph 5: Facing south from near TP908A,
stockpile visible.
Photograph 6: Facing northwest from near
TP908A, stockpile visible.
Photograph 7: Facing southwest from near
TP913A.
Photograph 8: Facing northwest from near
TP913A.
4.3 Subsurface Conditions
Reference to the 1:100,000 Newcastle Coalfield Regional Geology Sheet indicates the site to
be underlain by the Permian Aged Tomago Coal Measures, which are characterised by
Siltstone, Sandstone, Coal, Tuff and Claystone rock types.
Table 1 presents a summary of the typical soil types encountered at test pit locations during the
field investigation, divided into representative geotechnical units.
Table 2 contains a summary of the distribution of the above geotechnical units at the test pit
locations.
Minor water inflow was encountered in TP905A at a depth of 1.0m below existing ground level.
No groundwater levels or inflows were encountered in the other test pits during the limited time
that they remained open on the day of the field investigations for Stage 9.
It should be noted that groundwater conditions can vary due to rainfall and other influences
including regional groundwater flow, temperature, permeability, recharge areas, surface
condition, and subsoil drainage.
PROPOSED SUBDIVISION – THE BOWER STAGE 9 – CAROLINA ROAD, MEDOWIE
6 May 2020 5 NEW15P-0033K-AA
TABLE 1 – SUMMARY OF GEOTECHNICAL UNITS AND SOIL TYPES
Unit Soil Type Description
1A FILL – TOPSOIL &
Mulch
Silty SAND – fine to coarse grained, grey, fines of low plasticity,
with fine to medium grained sub-rounded to sub-angular gravel,
root affected.
50mm of tree mulch in TP906A.
1B CONTROLLED FILL
CLAY / Sandy CLAY – medium to high plasticity, mixtures of pale
grey, grey-brown to dark brown and trace orange to red-brown,
fine to coarse grained sand, with some fine to coarse grained
sub-angular gravel, trace angular cobbles in places.
Sandy CLAY – low to medium plasticity, dark grey-brown, fine
grained sand, trace fine to medium grained angular gravel.
Clayey Sandy GRAVEL – fine to coarse grained angular to sub-
angular, grey to pale grey-white and brown to orange, fine to
coarse grained sand, fines of medium to high plasticity.
1C UNCONTROLLED
FILL
Not encountered during current investigation.
2 TOPSOIL
Silty SAND – fine to coarse grained, grey-brown, fines of low
plasticity, generally trace fine grained sub-angular gravel, root
affected.
Sandy CLAY – low to medium plasticity, dark grey to grey-brown,
fine grained sand, root affected.
3 SLOPEWASH /
COLLUVIUM
Sandy CLAY – low to medium plasticity, dark grey to grey-brown,
fine grained sand, trace rootlets.
CLAY – medium to high plasticity, brown and grey-brown, trace
tree roots.
4 RESIDUAL SOIL
CLAY – medium to high plasticity, generally pale grey / grey, with
colour combinations of brown, pale orange to orange, dark grey
to grey-brown, and red-brown.
5
EXTREMELY
WEATHERED (XW)
ROCK
(with soil
properties)
Sandy Siltstone; breaks down into Clayey Sandy GRAVEL – fine to
coarse grained, sub-angular to angular, pale grey with some pale
orange to red-brown, fine to coarse grained sand, fines of
medium to high plasticity.
6 HIGHLY
WEATHERED (HW)
ROCK
Silty SANDSTONE – fine grained, orange to dark brown and pale
grey to white, estimated low to medium strength, generally
fractured.
In most pits logged as extremely to highly weathered rock and
excavated as Sandy GRAVEL - fine to coarse grained, angular to
sub-angular, fine to coarse sand, trace fines of medium to high
plasticity.
PROPOSED SUBDIVISION – THE BOWER STAGE 9 – CAROLINA ROAD, MEDOWIE
6 May 2020 6 NEW15P-0033K-AA
TABLE 2 – SUMMARY OF GEOTECHNICAL UNITS ENCOUNTERED AT EACH TEST PIT LOCATION
Location Unit 1A
Fill: Topsoil &
Mulch
Unit 1B
Controlled Fill
Unit 1C
Uncontrolled
Fill
Unit 2
Topsoil
Unit 3
Slopewash /
Colluvium
Unit 4
Residual Soil
Unit 5
Extremely
Weathered Rock
Unit 6
Highly
Weathered Rock
Depth (m)
Current Investigation – Stage 9
TP901A - - - 0.00 - 0.15 0.15 - 0.25 0.25 - 2.00 - -
TP902A - - - 0.00 - 0.15 0.15 - 0.30 0.30 - 2.00 - -
TP903A - - - 0.00 - 0.15 0.15 - 0.30 0.30 - 2.00 - -
TP904A - - - 0.00 - 0.30 - 0.30 - 1.30 1.30 - 1.60^
TP905A 0.00 - 0.20 0.20 - 0.80 - - - 0.80 - 1.40 1.40 - 1.70^
TP906A 0.00 - 0.05 - - - - 0.05 - 1.00 1.00 - 1.10^
TP907A - - - 0.00 - 0.20 - 0.20 - 1.70 1.70 - 1.80^
TP908A - - - 0.00 - 0.20 - 0.20 - 1.80 1.80 - 2.00^
TP909A - - - 0.00 - 0.02 0.02 - 0.10 0.10 - 1.10 1.10 - 1.80^ -
TP910A - - - 0.00 - 0.30 - 0.30 - 1.30 1.30 - 1.90 -
TP911A 0.00 - 0.05 0.05 - 1.20 - - - 1.20 - 2.00 - -
TP912A 0.00 - 0.10 0.10 - 1.60 - - - 1.60 - 2.00 - -
TP913A - 0.00 - 2.00 - - - - - -
TP914A - 0.00 - 2.10 - - - - - -
TP915A - 0.00 - 1.60 - - - 1.60 - 2.00 - -
TP916A 0.00 - 0.15 0.15 - 1.20 - - - 1.20 - 2.00 - -
TP917A 0.00 - 0.15 0.15 - 1.00 - - 1.00 - 1.10 1.00 - 2.00 - -
PROPOSED SUBDIVISION – THE BOWER STAGE 9 – CAROLINA ROAD, MEDOWIE
6 May 2020 7 NEW15P-0033K-AA
Location Unit 1A
Fill: Topsoil &
Mulch
Unit 1B
Controlled Fill
Unit 1C
Uncontrolled
Fill
Unit 2
Topsoil
Unit 3
Slopewash /
Colluvium
Unit 4
Residual Soil
Unit 5
Extremely
Weathered Rock
Unit 6
Highly
Weathered Rock
TP918A - - - 0.00 - 0.20 - 0.20 - 0.70 - 0.70 - 0.71
TP919A - 0.00 - 0.50 - - - 0.50 - 0.60 - -
Previous Geotechnical Investigation (Ref: NEW15P-0033F-AB, dated 22/11/2019)
TP705A - - - - 0.00 - 0.10 0.10 - 2.00 - -
TP706A 0.00 - 0.03 0.03 - 1.50 - - - 1.50 - 2.00 - -
TP713A - 0.00 - 2.00 - - - - - -
Previous Geotechnical Assessment (Ref: NEW18P-0102-AA, 15 August 2018)
TP7-01 - - - 0.00 - 0.20 - 0.20 - 1.80 - -
TP10-01 - - - 0.00 - 0.10 - 0.10 - 1.80 - -
TP10-02 - - - 0.00 - 0.20 - 0.20 - 1.90 - -
TP10-03 - - - 0.00 - 0.20 - 0.20 - 1.90 - -
Notes: * = Refusal or Practical refusal of 2.7 tonne excavator met on Highly Weathered Rock.
^ = Slow to very slow progress, close to practical refusal of 2.7 tonne excavator.
PROPOSED SUBDIVISION – THE BOWER STAGE 9 – CAROLINA ROAD, MEDOWIE
6 May 2020 8 NEW15P-0033K-AA
5.0 Laboratory Testing
Samples collected during the current field investigations were returned to our NATA accredited
Warabrook Laboratory for testing which comprised of:
(25 no.) Shrink / Swell tests.
Results of the laboratory testing are presented in Appendix B, with a summary of the
Shrink/Swell test results presented in Table 3.
Table 3 also include summaries of laboratory testing information where applicable from the
previous reports by Qualtest.
TABLE 3 – SUMMARY OF SHRINK / SWELL TESTING RESULTS
Location Depth (m) Material Description Iss (%)
Current Investigation – Stage 9
TP901A 0.50 - 0.65 (CH) CLAY 4.1
TP902A 1.00 - 1.15 (CH) CLAY 3.0
TP903A 0.60 - 0.72 (CH) CLAY 4.0
TP904A 1.00 - 1.15 (CH) CLAY 4.2
TP905A 0.50 - 0.75 FILL: (CH) CLAY 2.6
TP905A 1.10 - 1.40 (CH) CLAY 3.1
TP906A 0.60 - 0.80 (CH) CLAY 3.4
TP907A 1.00 - 1.15 (CH) CLAY 4.4
TP908A 0.60 - 0.75 (CH) CLAY 4.6
TP909A 0.60 - 0.75 (CH) CLAY 3.1
TP910A 0.60 - 0.80 (CH) CLAY 4.9
TP911A 0.50 - 0.70 FILL: (CH) Sandy CLAY 2.9
TP911A 1.00 - 1.15 FILL: (CH) Sandy CLAY 1.1
TP911A 1.30 - 1.45 (CH) CLAY 4.5
TP912A 0.50 - 0.65 FILL: (CH) Sandy CLAY 1.5
TP912A 1.10 - 1.30 FILL: (CH) Sandy CLAY 1.4
TP913A 0.60 - 0.90 FILL: (CH) Sandy CLAY 1.6
TP913A 1.40 - 1.60 FILL: (CL) Sandy CLAY 1.5
TP914A 0.70 - 0.85 FILL: (CH) Sandy CLAY 1.9
TP915A 0.50 - 0.65 FILL: (CH) Sandy CLAY 1.0
TP915A 1.10 - 1.25 FILL: (CH) Sandy CLAY 1.5
TP916A 0.50 - 0.65 FILL: (CH) Sandy CLAY 0.9
TP916A 1.20 - 1.35 (CH) CLAY 2.8
PROPOSED SUBDIVISION – THE BOWER STAGE 9 – CAROLINA ROAD, MEDOWIE
6 May 2020 9 NEW15P-0033K-AA
Location Depth (m) Material Description Iss (%)
TP917A 0.60 - 0.75 FILL: (CH) Sandy CLAY 1.6
TP917A 1.10 - 1.30 (CH) CLAY 2.1
Previous Geotechnical Investigation (Ref: NEW15P-0033F-AB, dated 22/11/2019)
TP705A 0.90 – 1.10 (CH) CLAY 5.7
TP706A 0.50 – 0.70 FILL: (CH) Sandy CLAY 2.6
TP706A 1.10 – 1.30 FILL: (CH) CLAY 2.7
TP713A 0.30 – 0.65 FILL: (CH) CLAY 3.6
TP713A 1.00 – 1.25 FILL: (CH) CLAY 3.9
Previous Geotechnical Assessment (Ref: NEW18P-0102-AA, 15 August 2018)
TP7-01 0.70 – 0.90 (CH) CLAY 4.3
TP10-01 0.40 – 0.55 (CH)CLAY 4.2
TP10-02 0.70 – 0.90 (CH) CLAY 2.2
TP10-03 0.60 – 0.75 (CH) CLAY 3.3
6.0 Site Classification to AS2870-2011
Based on the results of the field work, laboratory testing, and site regrade works carried out,
residential lots located within The Bower Stage 9, Carolina Road, Medowie as shown in the
attached Figure AA1, are classified in their current condition in accordance with AS2870-2011
’Residential Slabs and Footings’, as shown in Table 4.
TABLE 4 – SITE CLASSIFICATION TO AS2870-2011
Stage Lot Numbers Site Classification
9
901 to 908 H1
909 to 934 H2
Any areas where stockpiles or uncontrolled fill
of depths greater than 0.4m remain.
P
A characteristic free surface movement in the range of 40mm to 60mm is estimated for the lots
classified as Class ‘H1’ in their existing condition.
A characteristic free surface movement in the range of 60mm to 75mm is estimated for the lots
classified as Class ‘H2’ in their existing condition.
The effects of changes to the soil profile by additional cutting and filling and the effects of past
and future trees should be considered in selection of the design value for differential
movement.
If site re-grading works involving cutting or filling are performed after the date of this assessment
the classification may change and further advice should be sought.
PROPOSED SUBDIVISION – THE BOWER STAGE 9 – CAROLINA ROAD, MEDOWIE
6 May 2020 10 NEW15P-0033K-AA
Final site classification will be dependent on the type of fill and level of supervision carried out.
Re-classification of lots should be confirmed by the geotechnical authority at the time of
construction following any site re-grade works.
Footings for the proposed development should be designed and constructed in accordance
with the requirements of AS2870-2011.
The classification presented above assumes that:
All footings are founded in controlled fill (if applicable) or in the residual clayey soils or rock
below all non-controlled fill, topsoil material and root zones, and fill under slab panels meets
the requirements of AS2870-2011, in particular, the root zone must be removed prior to the
placement of fill materials beneath slabs.
The performance expectations set out in Appendix B of AS2870-2011 are acceptable, and
that site foundation maintenance is undertaken to avoid extremes of wetting and drying.
Footings are to be founded outside of or below all zones of influence resulting from existing
or future service trenches.
The constructional and architectural requirements for reactive clay sites set out in AS2870-
2011 are followed.
Adherence to the detailing requirement outlined in Section 5 of AS2870-2011 ‘Residential
Slabs and Footings’ is essential, in particular Section 5.6, ‘Additional requirements for Classes
M, H1, H2 and E sites’ including architectural restrictions, plumbing and drainage
requirements.
Site maintenance complies with the provisions of CSIRO Sheet BTF 18, “Foundation
Maintenance and Footing Performance: A Homeowner’s Guide”, a copy of which is
attached in Appendix C.
All structural elements on all lots should be supported on footings founded beneath all
uncontrolled fill, layers of inadequate bearing capacity, soft/loose, wet or other potentially
deleterious material.
If any localised areas of uncontrolled fill of depths greater than 0.4m are encountered during
construction, footings should be designed in accordance with engineering principles for
Class ‘P’ sites.
7.0 Limitations
The findings presented in the report and used as the basis for recommendations presented
herein were obtained using normal, industry accepted geotechnical design practices and
standards. To our knowledge, they represent a reasonable interpretation of the general
conditions of the site.
The extent of testing associated with this assessment is limited to discrete test pit locations. It
should be noted that subsurface conditions between and away from the test pit locations may
be different to those observed during the field work and used as the basis of the
recommendations contained in this report.
If subsurface conditions encountered during construction differ from those given in this report,
further advice should be sought without delay.
PROPOSED SUBDIVISION – THE BOWER STAGE 9 – CAROLINA ROAD, MEDOWIE
6 May 2020 11 NEW15P-0033K-AA
Data and opinions contained within the report may not be used in other contexts or for any
other purposes without prior review and agreement by Qualtest. If this report is reproduced, it
must be in full.
If you have any further questions regarding this report, please do not hesitate to contact Ben
Edwards, Shannon Kelly, or the undersigned.
For and on behalf of Qualtest Laboratory (NSW) Pty Ltd.
Jason Lee
Principal Geotechnical Engineer
FIGURE AA1:
Site Plan and Approximate Test Locations
Client:
Project:
Location:
Title:
N.T.S.
5 May 2020
MCCLOY DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT PTY LTD
THE BOWER SUBDIVISION - STAGE 9
CAROLINA ROAD, MEDOWIE
SITE PLAN AND APPROXIMATE TEST LOCATIONS
Drawing No:
Project No:
Scale:
Date:
FIGURE AA1
NEW15P-0033K
LEGEND:
N
Based on site plan prepared by Acor Consultants(Project No. NE180023, Dwg No. C903.01, Issue. D, dated 27/09/2019)
TP903A
TP905A
TP904A
TP908ATP909A
TP910A
TP911A
TP912A
TP913A
TP914A
TP915ATP916A
TP917A
TP906A
TP918A
TP706A
TP713A
TP705A
TP10-03
TP10-02
TP7-01
TP10-01
Approximate test pit location (Qualtest, 2020).
Approximate test pit location (Qualtest, 2014 - 2019).
Approximate area of topsoil stockpiles.
TP919A
TP907A
TP902A
TP901A
APPENDIX A:
Results of Field Investigations
VSt
St
0.15m
0.25m
2.00m
TOPSOIL
SLOPE WASH
RESIDUAL SOIL
E
SM
CL
CH
M <
wP
M >
wP
D - M
U500.65m
0.50m
TOPSOIL: Silty SAND - fine to coarse grained, grey,fines of low plasticity, with fine to medium grainedsub-rounded to sub-angular gravel, root affected,
Sandy CLAY - low to medium plasticity, dark grey togrey-brown, fine grained sand, trace rootlets.
CLAY - medium to high plasticity, grey-brown, withsome orange.
Hole Terminated at 2.00 m
HP 250
HP 200
HP 180
HP 180
HP 180
HP 180
Not
Enc
ount
ered
Field Test
PID Photoionisation detector reading (ppm)DCP(x-y) Dynamic penetrometer test (test depth interval shown)
HP Hand Penetrometer test (UCS kPa)
Material description and profile information
UCS (kPa)D DryM MoistW WetWp Plastic LimitWL Liquid Limit
Field Tests
Notes, Samples and Tests
Structure and additionalobservations
ME
TH
OD
CLA
SS
IFIC
AT
ION
SY
MB
OL
Tes
t T
ype
MO
IST
UR
EC
ON
DIT
ION
CO
NS
IST
EN
CY
DE
NS
ITY
Water
WA
TE
R
Gradational ortransitional strataDefinitive or distictstrata change
Strata Changes
RL(m)
GR
AP
HIC
LOGDEPTH
(m)
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
SAMPLES
Water Level
(Date and time shown)
Water Inflow
Water Outflow
VS Very SoftS SoftF FirmSt Stiff
VSt Very StiffH HardFb Friable
U50 50mm Diameter tube sampleCBR Bulk sample for CBR testing
E Environmental sample(Glass jar, sealed and chilled on site)
ASS Acid Sulfate Soil Sample(Plastic bag, air expelled, chilled)
B Bulk Sample
Consistency Moisture Condition
V Very Loose Density Index <15%L Loose Density Index 15 - 35%MD Medium Dense Density Index 35 - 65%D Dense Density Index 65 - 85%VD Very Dense Density Index 85 - 100%
Density
LEGEND:
Res
ult
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION: Soil type, plasticity/particlecharacteristics,colour,minor components
Drilling and Sampling
<2525 - 5050 - 100100 - 200200 - 400>400
QT
LIB
1.1
.GLB
Log
NO
N-C
OR
ED
BO
RE
HO
LE -
TE
ST
PIT
NE
W15
P-0
033K
LO
GS
.GP
J <
<D
raw
ingF
ile>
> 0
4/05
/202
0 19
:35
10.
0.00
0 D
atge
l Lab
and
In S
itu T
ool
CLIENT: McCLOY DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT PTY LTD
PROJECT: STAGE 9, THE BOWER
LOCATION: CAROLINA ROAD, MEDOWIE
ENGINEERING LOG - TEST PIT
EQUIPMENT TYPE: 2.7 TONNE EXCAVATOR
TEST PIT LENGTH: 2.0 m WIDTH: 0.5 m
TEST PIT NO: TP901APAGE: 1 OF 1
JOB NO: NEW15P-0033K
LOGGED BY: BE
DATE: 17/4/20
SURFACE RL:
DATUM:
VSt
0.15m
0.30m
2.00m
TOPSOIL
SLOPE WASH
RESIDUAL SOIL
E
SM
CL
CH
M <
wP
M >
wP
D - M
U501.15m
1.00m
TOPSOIL: Silty SAND - fine to coarse grained, grey,fines of low plasticity, with fine to medium grainedsub-rounded to sub-angular gravel, root affected,
Sandy CLAY - low to medium plasticity, dark grey togrey-brown, fine grained sand, trace rootlets.
CLAY - medium to high plasticity, grey and brown,with orange to red-brown.
Grey, with orange to red-brown.
Grey and red-brown, trace orange.
Hole Terminated at 2.00 m
HP 480
HP 390
HP 350
HP 350
HP 250
HP 230
HP 230
Not
Enc
ount
ered
Field Test
PID Photoionisation detector reading (ppm)DCP(x-y) Dynamic penetrometer test (test depth interval shown)
HP Hand Penetrometer test (UCS kPa)
Material description and profile information
UCS (kPa)D DryM MoistW WetWp Plastic LimitWL Liquid Limit
Field Tests
Notes, Samples and Tests
Structure and additionalobservations
ME
TH
OD
CLA
SS
IFIC
AT
ION
SY
MB
OL
Tes
t T
ype
MO
IST
UR
EC
ON
DIT
ION
CO
NS
IST
EN
CY
DE
NS
ITY
Water
WA
TE
R
Gradational ortransitional strataDefinitive or distictstrata change
Strata Changes
RL(m)
GR
AP
HIC
LOGDEPTH
(m)
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
SAMPLES
Water Level
(Date and time shown)
Water Inflow
Water Outflow
VS Very SoftS SoftF FirmSt Stiff
VSt Very StiffH HardFb Friable
U50 50mm Diameter tube sampleCBR Bulk sample for CBR testing
E Environmental sample(Glass jar, sealed and chilled on site)
ASS Acid Sulfate Soil Sample(Plastic bag, air expelled, chilled)
B Bulk Sample
Consistency Moisture Condition
V Very Loose Density Index <15%L Loose Density Index 15 - 35%MD Medium Dense Density Index 35 - 65%D Dense Density Index 65 - 85%VD Very Dense Density Index 85 - 100%
Density
LEGEND:
Res
ult
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION: Soil type, plasticity/particlecharacteristics,colour,minor components
Drilling and Sampling
<2525 - 5050 - 100100 - 200200 - 400>400
QT
LIB
1.1
.GLB
Log
NO
N-C
OR
ED
BO
RE
HO
LE -
TE
ST
PIT
NE
W15
P-0
033K
LO
GS
.GP
J <
<D
raw
ingF
ile>
> 0
4/05
/202
0 19
:35
10.
0.00
0 D
atge
l Lab
and
In S
itu T
ool
CLIENT: McCLOY DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT PTY LTD
PROJECT: STAGE 9, THE BOWER
LOCATION: CAROLINA ROAD, MEDOWIE
ENGINEERING LOG - TEST PIT
EQUIPMENT TYPE: 2.7 TONNE EXCAVATOR
TEST PIT LENGTH: 2.0 m WIDTH: 0.5 m
TEST PIT NO: TP902APAGE: 1 OF 1
JOB NO: NEW15P-0033K
LOGGED BY: BE
DATE: 17/4/20
SURFACE RL:
DATUM:
VSt
St
0.15m
0.30m
2.00m
TOPSOIL
SLOPE WASH
RESIDUAL SOIL
E
SM
CL
CH
M <
wP
M >
wP
D - M
U500.72m
0.60m
TOPSOIL: Silty SAND - fine to coarse grained, grey,fines of low plasticity, with fine to medium grainedsub-rounded to sub-angular gravel, root affected,
Sandy CLAY - low to medium plasticity, dark grey togrey-brown, fine grained sand, trace rootlets.
CLAY - medium to high plasticity, grey and brown.
Grey, with orange to red-brown.
Grey with some pale orange.
Hole Terminated at 2.00 m
HP 260
HP 280
HP 260
HP 200
HP 180
HP 150
HP 150
Not
Enc
ount
ered
Field Test
PID Photoionisation detector reading (ppm)DCP(x-y) Dynamic penetrometer test (test depth interval shown)
HP Hand Penetrometer test (UCS kPa)
Material description and profile information
UCS (kPa)D DryM MoistW WetWp Plastic LimitWL Liquid Limit
Field Tests
Notes, Samples and Tests
Structure and additionalobservations
ME
TH
OD
CLA
SS
IFIC
AT
ION
SY
MB
OL
Tes
t T
ype
MO
IST
UR
EC
ON
DIT
ION
CO
NS
IST
EN
CY
DE
NS
ITY
Water
WA
TE
R
Gradational ortransitional strataDefinitive or distictstrata change
Strata Changes
RL(m)
GR
AP
HIC
LOGDEPTH
(m)
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
SAMPLES
Water Level
(Date and time shown)
Water Inflow
Water Outflow
VS Very SoftS SoftF FirmSt Stiff
VSt Very StiffH HardFb Friable
U50 50mm Diameter tube sampleCBR Bulk sample for CBR testing
E Environmental sample(Glass jar, sealed and chilled on site)
ASS Acid Sulfate Soil Sample(Plastic bag, air expelled, chilled)
B Bulk Sample
Consistency Moisture Condition
V Very Loose Density Index <15%L Loose Density Index 15 - 35%MD Medium Dense Density Index 35 - 65%D Dense Density Index 65 - 85%VD Very Dense Density Index 85 - 100%
Density
LEGEND:
Res
ult
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION: Soil type, plasticity/particlecharacteristics,colour,minor components
Drilling and Sampling
<2525 - 5050 - 100100 - 200200 - 400>400
QT
LIB
1.1
.GLB
Log
NO
N-C
OR
ED
BO
RE
HO
LE -
TE
ST
PIT
NE
W15
P-0
033K
LO
GS
.GP
J <
<D
raw
ingF
ile>
> 0
4/05
/202
0 19
:35
10.
0.00
0 D
atge
l Lab
and
In S
itu T
ool
CLIENT: McCLOY DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT PTY LTD
PROJECT: STAGE 9, THE BOWER
LOCATION: CAROLINA ROAD, MEDOWIE
ENGINEERING LOG - TEST PIT
EQUIPMENT TYPE: 2.7 TONNE EXCAVATOR
TEST PIT LENGTH: 2.0 m WIDTH: 0.5 m
TEST PIT NO: TP903APAGE: 1 OF 1
JOB NO: NEW15P-0033K
LOGGED BY: BE
DATE: 17/4/20
SURFACE RL:
DATUM:
St
D
0.30m
1.30m
1.60m
TOPSOIL
RESIDUAL SOIL
EXTREMELY TO HIGHLYWEATHERED ROCK
E
CL
CH
M <
wP
M >
wP
D - M
U501.15m
1.00m
TOPSOIL: Sandy CLAY - low to medium plasticity,dark grey to grey-brown, fine grained sand, rootaffected.
CLAY - medium to high plasticity, grey with somepale orange.
Sandy SILTSTONE - fine grained, orange to darkbrown and pale grey, estimated low to mediumstrength, highly fractured. Excavated as SandyGRAVEL - fine to coarse grained, angular tosub-angular, fine to coarse sand, trace fines ofmedium to high plasticity.
Hole Terminated at 1.60 mSlow progress
HP 120
HP 130
HP 180
HP 180
HP 180
Not
Enc
ount
ered
Field Test
PID Photoionisation detector reading (ppm)DCP(x-y) Dynamic penetrometer test (test depth interval shown)
HP Hand Penetrometer test (UCS kPa)
Material description and profile information
UCS (kPa)D DryM MoistW WetWp Plastic LimitWL Liquid Limit
Field Tests
Notes, Samples and Tests
Structure and additionalobservations
ME
TH
OD
CLA
SS
IFIC
AT
ION
SY
MB
OL
Tes
t T
ype
MO
IST
UR
EC
ON
DIT
ION
CO
NS
IST
EN
CY
DE
NS
ITY
Water
WA
TE
R
Gradational ortransitional strataDefinitive or distictstrata change
Strata Changes
RL(m)
GR
AP
HIC
LOGDEPTH
(m)
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
SAMPLES
Water Level
(Date and time shown)
Water Inflow
Water Outflow
VS Very SoftS SoftF FirmSt Stiff
VSt Very StiffH HardFb Friable
U50 50mm Diameter tube sampleCBR Bulk sample for CBR testing
E Environmental sample(Glass jar, sealed and chilled on site)
ASS Acid Sulfate Soil Sample(Plastic bag, air expelled, chilled)
B Bulk Sample
Consistency Moisture Condition
V Very Loose Density Index <15%L Loose Density Index 15 - 35%MD Medium Dense Density Index 35 - 65%D Dense Density Index 65 - 85%VD Very Dense Density Index 85 - 100%
Density
LEGEND:
Res
ult
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION: Soil type, plasticity/particlecharacteristics,colour,minor components
Drilling and Sampling
<2525 - 5050 - 100100 - 200200 - 400>400
QT
LIB
1.1
.GLB
Log
NO
N-C
OR
ED
BO
RE
HO
LE -
TE
ST
PIT
NE
W15
P-0
033K
LO
GS
.GP
J <
<D
raw
ingF
ile>
> 0
4/05
/202
0 19
:35
10.
0.00
0 D
atge
l Lab
and
In S
itu T
ool
CLIENT: McCLOY DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT PTY LTD
PROJECT: STAGE 9, THE BOWER
LOCATION: CAROLINA ROAD, MEDOWIE
ENGINEERING LOG - TEST PIT
EQUIPMENT TYPE: 2.7 TONNE EXCAVATOR
TEST PIT LENGTH: 2.0 m WIDTH: 0.5 m
TEST PIT NO: TP904APAGE: 1 OF 1
JOB NO: NEW15P-0033K
LOGGED BY: BE
DATE: 17/4/20
SURFACE RL:
DATUM:
St -VSt
St
D
0.20m
0.80m
1.40m
1.70m
FILL: TOPSOIL
FILL - CONTROLLED
RESIDUAL SOIL
1.0M: MINOR WATERINFLOW AT NORTHERNEND OF TEST PIT.
EXTREMELY TO HIGHLYWEATHERED ROCK
E
SM
CH
CH
M >
wP
D - M
D - M
U50
0.75m
U50
1.40m
0.50m
1.10m
FILL-TOPSOIL: Silty SAND - fine to coarse grained,grey, fines of low plasticity, with fine to mediumgrained sub-rounded to sub-angular gravel, rootaffected.
FILL: CLAY - medium to high plasticity, dark grey,trace orange and pale grey-white, trace fine grainedsand, trace fine to medium grained sub-angular tosub-rounded gravel, trace sandy gravel pockets.
CLAY - medium to high plasticity, dark grey-brown,trace orange and red-brown.
Sandy SILTSTONE - fine grained, pale grey-white todark grey and orange to brown, estimated low tomedium strength, highly fractured. Excavated asSandy GRAVEL - fine to coarse grained, angular tosub-angular, fine to coarse sand, trace fines ofmedium to high plasticity.
Hole Terminated at 1.70 mSlow progress
HP 300
HP 180-
250
HP 250
HP 150
HP 110
HP 100-
130
HP 150
Field Test
PID Photoionisation detector reading (ppm)DCP(x-y) Dynamic penetrometer test (test depth interval shown)
HP Hand Penetrometer test (UCS kPa)
Material description and profile information
UCS (kPa)D DryM MoistW WetWp Plastic LimitWL Liquid Limit
Field Tests
Notes, Samples and Tests
Structure and additionalobservations
ME
TH
OD
CLA
SS
IFIC
AT
ION
SY
MB
OL
Tes
t T
ype
MO
IST
UR
EC
ON
DIT
ION
CO
NS
IST
EN
CY
DE
NS
ITY
Water
WA
TE
R
Gradational ortransitional strataDefinitive or distictstrata change
Strata Changes
RL(m)
GR
AP
HIC
LOGDEPTH
(m)
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
SAMPLES
Water Level
(Date and time shown)
Water Inflow
Water Outflow
VS Very SoftS SoftF FirmSt Stiff
VSt Very StiffH HardFb Friable
U50 50mm Diameter tube sampleCBR Bulk sample for CBR testing
E Environmental sample(Glass jar, sealed and chilled on site)
ASS Acid Sulfate Soil Sample(Plastic bag, air expelled, chilled)
B Bulk Sample
Consistency Moisture Condition
V Very Loose Density Index <15%L Loose Density Index 15 - 35%MD Medium Dense Density Index 35 - 65%D Dense Density Index 65 - 85%VD Very Dense Density Index 85 - 100%
Density
LEGEND:
Res
ult
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION: Soil type, plasticity/particlecharacteristics,colour,minor components
Drilling and Sampling
<2525 - 5050 - 100100 - 200200 - 400>400
QT
LIB
1.1
.GLB
Log
NO
N-C
OR
ED
BO
RE
HO
LE -
TE
ST
PIT
NE
W15
P-0
033K
LO
GS
.GP
J <
<D
raw
ingF
ile>
> 0
4/05
/202
0 19
:35
10.
0.00
0 D
atge
l Lab
and
In S
itu T
ool
CLIENT: McCLOY DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT PTY LTD
PROJECT: STAGE 9, THE BOWER
LOCATION: CAROLINA ROAD, MEDOWIE
ENGINEERING LOG - TEST PIT
EQUIPMENT TYPE: 2.7 TONNE EXCAVATOR
TEST PIT LENGTH: 2.0 m WIDTH: 0.5 m
TEST PIT NO: TP905APAGE: 1 OF 1
JOB NO: NEW15P-0033K
LOGGED BY: BE
DATE: 16/4/20
SURFACE RL:
DATUM:
St
D
0.05m
1.00m
1.10m
FILL: TREE MULCH
RESIDUAL SOIL
EXTREMELY TO HIGHLYWEATHERED ROCK
E
CH
M >
wP
D - M
D - M
U50
0.80m
0.60m
FILL: TREE MULCH.
CLAY - medium to high plasticity, pale grey, traceorange.
Grey, with some orange, trace fine to mediumgrained gravel inclusions.
Sandy SILTSTONE - fine grained, pale grey-white todark grey and orange to brown, estimated low tomedium strength, highly fractured. Excavated asSandy GRAVEL - fine to coarse grained, angular tosub-angular, fine to coarse sand, trace fines ofmedium to high plasticity.
Hole Terminated at 1.10 mSlow progress
HP 110
HP 100-
110
HP 100-
110
Not
Enc
ount
ered
Field Test
PID Photoionisation detector reading (ppm)DCP(x-y) Dynamic penetrometer test (test depth interval shown)
HP Hand Penetrometer test (UCS kPa)
Material description and profile information
UCS (kPa)D DryM MoistW WetWp Plastic LimitWL Liquid Limit
Field Tests
Notes, Samples and Tests
Structure and additionalobservations
ME
TH
OD
CLA
SS
IFIC
AT
ION
SY
MB
OL
Tes
t T
ype
MO
IST
UR
EC
ON
DIT
ION
CO
NS
IST
EN
CY
DE
NS
ITY
Water
WA
TE
R
Gradational ortransitional strataDefinitive or distictstrata change
Strata Changes
RL(m)
GR
AP
HIC
LOGDEPTH
(m)
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
SAMPLES
Water Level
(Date and time shown)
Water Inflow
Water Outflow
VS Very SoftS SoftF FirmSt Stiff
VSt Very StiffH HardFb Friable
U50 50mm Diameter tube sampleCBR Bulk sample for CBR testing
E Environmental sample(Glass jar, sealed and chilled on site)
ASS Acid Sulfate Soil Sample(Plastic bag, air expelled, chilled)
B Bulk Sample
Consistency Moisture Condition
V Very Loose Density Index <15%L Loose Density Index 15 - 35%MD Medium Dense Density Index 35 - 65%D Dense Density Index 65 - 85%VD Very Dense Density Index 85 - 100%
Density
LEGEND:
Res
ult
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION: Soil type, plasticity/particlecharacteristics,colour,minor components
Drilling and Sampling
<2525 - 5050 - 100100 - 200200 - 400>400
QT
LIB
1.1
.GLB
Log
NO
N-C
OR
ED
BO
RE
HO
LE -
TE
ST
PIT
NE
W15
P-0
033K
LO
GS
.GP
J <
<D
raw
ingF
ile>
> 0
4/05
/202
0 19
:35
10.
0.00
0 D
atge
l Lab
and
In S
itu T
ool
CLIENT: McCLOY DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT PTY LTD
PROJECT: STAGE 9, THE BOWER
LOCATION: CAROLINA ROAD, MEDOWIE
ENGINEERING LOG - TEST PIT
EQUIPMENT TYPE: 2.7 TONNE EXCAVATOR
TEST PIT LENGTH: 2.0 m WIDTH: 0.5 m
TEST PIT NO: TP906APAGE: 1 OF 1
JOB NO: NEW15P-0033K
LOGGED BY: BE
DATE: 16/4/20
SURFACE RL:
DATUM:
VSt
St
D
0.20m
1.70m
1.80m
TOPSOIL
RESIDUAL SOIL
EXTREMELY TO HIGHLYWEATHERED ROCK
E
SM
CH
M >
wP
D - M
D - M
U501.15m
1.00m
TOPSOIL: Silty SAND - fine to coarse grained, grey,fines of low plasticity, with fine to medium grainedsub-rounded to sub-angular gravel, root affected.
CLAY - medium to high plasticity, grey and orange tored-brown.
Sandy SILTSTONE - fine grained, pale grey-white todark grey and orange to brown, estimated low tomedium strength, highly fractured. Excavated asSandy GRAVEL - fine to coarse grained, angular tosub-angular, fine to coarse sand, trace fines ofmedium to high plasticity.
Hole Terminated at 1.80 mSlow progress
HP 280
HP 280
HP 220
HP 220
HP 200
HP 180
HP 180
HP 180
HP 180
Not
Enc
ount
ered
Field Test
PID Photoionisation detector reading (ppm)DCP(x-y) Dynamic penetrometer test (test depth interval shown)
HP Hand Penetrometer test (UCS kPa)
Material description and profile information
UCS (kPa)D DryM MoistW WetWp Plastic LimitWL Liquid Limit
Field Tests
Notes, Samples and Tests
Structure and additionalobservations
ME
TH
OD
CLA
SS
IFIC
AT
ION
SY
MB
OL
Tes
t T
ype
MO
IST
UR
EC
ON
DIT
ION
CO
NS
IST
EN
CY
DE
NS
ITY
Water
WA
TE
R
Gradational ortransitional strataDefinitive or distictstrata change
Strata Changes
RL(m)
GR
AP
HIC
LOGDEPTH
(m)
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
SAMPLES
Water Level
(Date and time shown)
Water Inflow
Water Outflow
VS Very SoftS SoftF FirmSt Stiff
VSt Very StiffH HardFb Friable
U50 50mm Diameter tube sampleCBR Bulk sample for CBR testing
E Environmental sample(Glass jar, sealed and chilled on site)
ASS Acid Sulfate Soil Sample(Plastic bag, air expelled, chilled)
B Bulk Sample
Consistency Moisture Condition
V Very Loose Density Index <15%L Loose Density Index 15 - 35%MD Medium Dense Density Index 35 - 65%D Dense Density Index 65 - 85%VD Very Dense Density Index 85 - 100%
Density
LEGEND:
Res
ult
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION: Soil type, plasticity/particlecharacteristics,colour,minor components
Drilling and Sampling
<2525 - 5050 - 100100 - 200200 - 400>400
QT
LIB
1.1
.GLB
Log
NO
N-C
OR
ED
BO
RE
HO
LE -
TE
ST
PIT
NE
W15
P-0
033K
LO
GS
.GP
J <
<D
raw
ingF
ile>
> 0
4/05
/202
0 19
:35
10.
0.00
0 D
atge
l Lab
and
In S
itu T
ool
CLIENT: McCLOY DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT PTY LTD
PROJECT: STAGE 9, THE BOWER
LOCATION: CAROLINA ROAD, MEDOWIE
ENGINEERING LOG - TEST PIT
EQUIPMENT TYPE: 2.7 TONNE EXCAVATOR
TEST PIT LENGTH: 2.0 m WIDTH: 0.5 m
TEST PIT NO: TP907APAGE: 1 OF 1
JOB NO: NEW15P-0033K
LOGGED BY: BE
DATE: 16/4/20
SURFACE RL:
DATUM:
St
D
0.20m
1.80m
2.00m
TOPSOIL
RESIDUAL SOIL
EXTREMELY TO HIGHLYWEATHERED ROCK
E
CL
CHM
> w
P
D - M
U500.75m
0.60m
TOPSOIL: Sandy CLAY - low to medium plasticity,dark grey-brown, fine grained sand, trace silt, rootaffected.
CLAY - medium to high plasticity, grey to brown, withorange.
Sandy SILTSTONE - fine grained, pale grey-white todark grey and orange to brown, estimated low tomedium strength, highly fractured. Excavated asSandy GRAVEL - fine to coarse grained, angular tosub-angular, fine to coarse sand, trace fines ofmedium to high plasticity.
Hole Terminated at 2.00 mSlow progress
HP 110
HP 150
HP 200
HP 180
HP 180
HP 180
HP 150
HP 150
Not
Enc
ount
ered
Field Test
PID Photoionisation detector reading (ppm)DCP(x-y) Dynamic penetrometer test (test depth interval shown)
HP Hand Penetrometer test (UCS kPa)
Material description and profile information
UCS (kPa)D DryM MoistW WetWp Plastic LimitWL Liquid Limit
Field Tests
Notes, Samples and Tests
Structure and additionalobservations
ME
TH
OD
CLA
SS
IFIC
AT
ION
SY
MB
OL
Tes
t T
ype
MO
IST
UR
EC
ON
DIT
ION
CO
NS
IST
EN
CY
DE
NS
ITY
Water
WA
TE
R
Gradational ortransitional strataDefinitive or distictstrata change
Strata Changes
RL(m)
GR
AP
HIC
LOGDEPTH
(m)
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
SAMPLES
Water Level
(Date and time shown)
Water Inflow
Water Outflow
VS Very SoftS SoftF FirmSt Stiff
VSt Very StiffH HardFb Friable
U50 50mm Diameter tube sampleCBR Bulk sample for CBR testing
E Environmental sample(Glass jar, sealed and chilled on site)
ASS Acid Sulfate Soil Sample(Plastic bag, air expelled, chilled)
B Bulk Sample
Consistency Moisture Condition
V Very Loose Density Index <15%L Loose Density Index 15 - 35%MD Medium Dense Density Index 35 - 65%D Dense Density Index 65 - 85%VD Very Dense Density Index 85 - 100%
Density
LEGEND:
Res
ult
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION: Soil type, plasticity/particlecharacteristics,colour,minor components
Drilling and Sampling
<2525 - 5050 - 100100 - 200200 - 400>400
QT
LIB
1.1
.GLB
Log
NO
N-C
OR
ED
BO
RE
HO
LE -
TE
ST
PIT
NE
W15
P-0
033K
LO
GS
.GP
J <
<D
raw
ingF
ile>
> 0
4/05
/202
0 19
:35
10.
0.00
0 D
atge
l Lab
and
In S
itu T
ool
CLIENT: McCLOY DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT PTY LTD
PROJECT: STAGE 9, THE BOWER
LOCATION: CAROLINA ROAD, MEDOWIE
ENGINEERING LOG - TEST PIT
EQUIPMENT TYPE: 2.7 TONNE EXCAVATOR
TEST PIT LENGTH: 2.0 m WIDTH: 0.5 m
TEST PIT NO: TP908APAGE: 1 OF 1
JOB NO: NEW15P-0033K
LOGGED BY: BE
DATE: 16/4/20
SURFACE RL:
DATUM:
D -MD
St
D
0.02m
0.10m
1.10m
1.80m
TOPSOILCOLLUVIUM / POSSIBLEFILL - DEPTHS RANGINGFROM 0.1M TO 0.4M.RESIDUAL SOIL
EXTREMELY WEATHEREDROCK
E
SMCI
CH
GC
M >
wP
D - M
D - M
U500.75m
0.60m
TOPSOIL: Silty SAND - fine to coarse grained, grey,fines of low plasticity, with fine to medium grainedsub-rounded to sub-angular gravel, root affected.
Sandy CLAY - medium plasticity, dark grey togrey-brown, fine grained sand, root affected.
CLAY - medium to high plasticity, grey with somepale orange.
Grey and red-brown.
Extremely weathered Sandy Siltstone with soilproperties: excavated as Clayey Sandy GRAVEL -fine to coarse grained, angular to sub-angular, palegrey with some pale orange to red-brown, fine tocoarse grained sand, fines of medium to highplasticity.
Hole Terminated at 1.80 mSlow progress
HP 120
HP 150
HP 180
HP 180
HP 180
Not
Enc
ount
ered
Field Test
PID Photoionisation detector reading (ppm)DCP(x-y) Dynamic penetrometer test (test depth interval shown)
HP Hand Penetrometer test (UCS kPa)
Material description and profile information
UCS (kPa)D DryM MoistW WetWp Plastic LimitWL Liquid Limit
Field Tests
Notes, Samples and Tests
Structure and additionalobservations
ME
TH
OD
CLA
SS
IFIC
AT
ION
SY
MB
OL
Tes
t T
ype
MO
IST
UR
EC
ON
DIT
ION
CO
NS
IST
EN
CY
DE
NS
ITY
Water
WA
TE
R
Gradational ortransitional strataDefinitive or distictstrata change
Strata Changes
RL(m)
GR
AP
HIC
LOGDEPTH
(m)
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
SAMPLES
Water Level
(Date and time shown)
Water Inflow
Water Outflow
VS Very SoftS SoftF FirmSt Stiff
VSt Very StiffH HardFb Friable
U50 50mm Diameter tube sampleCBR Bulk sample for CBR testing
E Environmental sample(Glass jar, sealed and chilled on site)
ASS Acid Sulfate Soil Sample(Plastic bag, air expelled, chilled)
B Bulk Sample
Consistency Moisture Condition
V Very Loose Density Index <15%L Loose Density Index 15 - 35%MD Medium Dense Density Index 35 - 65%D Dense Density Index 65 - 85%VD Very Dense Density Index 85 - 100%
Density
LEGEND:
Res
ult
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION: Soil type, plasticity/particlecharacteristics,colour,minor components
Drilling and Sampling
<2525 - 5050 - 100100 - 200200 - 400>400
QT
LIB
1.1
.GLB
Log
NO
N-C
OR
ED
BO
RE
HO
LE -
TE
ST
PIT
NE
W15
P-0
033K
LO
GS
.GP
J <
<D
raw
ingF
ile>
> 0
4/05
/202
0 19
:35
10.
0.00
0 D
atge
l Lab
and
In S
itu T
ool
CLIENT: McCLOY DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT PTY LTD
PROJECT: STAGE 9, THE BOWER
LOCATION: CAROLINA ROAD, MEDOWIE
ENGINEERING LOG - TEST PIT
EQUIPMENT TYPE: 2.7 TONNE EXCAVATOR
TEST PIT LENGTH: 2.0 m WIDTH: 0.5 m
TEST PIT NO: TP909APAGE: 1 OF 1
JOB NO: NEW15P-0033K
LOGGED BY: BE
DATE: 16/4/20
SURFACE RL:
DATUM:
VSt
D
0.20m
0.30m
1.30m
1.90m
TOPSOIL
RESIDUAL SOIL
EXTREMELY WEATHEREDROCK
SM
CL
CH
GC
M >
wP
D - M
D - M
U50
0.80m
0.60m
TOPSOIL: Silty SAND - fine to coarse grained, grey,fines of low plasticity, with fine to medium grainedsub-rounded to sub-angular gravel, root affected.
Sandy CLAY - low to medium plasticity, dark grey togrey-brown, fine grained sand, root affected.
CLAY - medium to high plasticity, grey with somepale orange.
Extremely weathered Sandy Siltstone with soilproperties: excavated as Clayey Sandy GRAVEL -fine to coarse grained, angular to sub-angular, palegrey with some pale orange to red-brown, fine tocoarse grained sand, fines of medium to highplasticity.
Hole Terminated at 1.90 m
HP 390
HP 350
HP 300
HP 250
HP 230
Not
Enc
ount
ered
Field Test
PID Photoionisation detector reading (ppm)DCP(x-y) Dynamic penetrometer test (test depth interval shown)
HP Hand Penetrometer test (UCS kPa)
Material description and profile information
UCS (kPa)D DryM MoistW WetWp Plastic LimitWL Liquid Limit
Field Tests
Notes, Samples and Tests
Structure and additionalobservations
ME
TH
OD
CLA
SS
IFIC
AT
ION
SY
MB
OL
Tes
t T
ype
MO
IST
UR
EC
ON
DIT
ION
CO
NS
IST
EN
CY
DE
NS
ITY
Water
WA
TE
R
Gradational ortransitional strataDefinitive or distictstrata change
Strata Changes
RL(m)
GR
AP
HIC
LOGDEPTH
(m)
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
SAMPLES
Water Level
(Date and time shown)
Water Inflow
Water Outflow
VS Very SoftS SoftF FirmSt Stiff
VSt Very StiffH HardFb Friable
U50 50mm Diameter tube sampleCBR Bulk sample for CBR testing
E Environmental sample(Glass jar, sealed and chilled on site)
ASS Acid Sulfate Soil Sample(Plastic bag, air expelled, chilled)
B Bulk Sample
Consistency Moisture Condition
V Very Loose Density Index <15%L Loose Density Index 15 - 35%MD Medium Dense Density Index 35 - 65%D Dense Density Index 65 - 85%VD Very Dense Density Index 85 - 100%
Density
LEGEND:
Res
ult
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION: Soil type, plasticity/particlecharacteristics,colour,minor components
Drilling and Sampling
<2525 - 5050 - 100100 - 200200 - 400>400
QT
LIB
1.1
.GLB
Log
NO
N-C
OR
ED
BO
RE
HO
LE -
TE
ST
PIT
NE
W15
P-0
033K
LO
GS
.GP
J <
<D
raw
ingF
ile>
> 0
4/05
/202
0 19
:35
10.
0.00
0 D
atge
l Lab
and
In S
itu T
ool
CLIENT: McCLOY DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT PTY LTD
PROJECT: STAGE 9, THE BOWER
LOCATION: CAROLINA ROAD, MEDOWIE
ENGINEERING LOG - TEST PIT
EQUIPMENT TYPE: 2.7 TONNE EXCAVATOR
TEST PIT LENGTH: 2.0 m WIDTH: 0.5 m
TEST PIT NO: TP910APAGE: 1 OF 1
JOB NO: NEW15P-0033K
LOGGED BY: BE
DATE: 16/4/20
SURFACE RL:
DATUM:
VSt -H
VSt
0.05m
1.20m
2.00m
FILL: TOPSOIL
FILL - CONTROLLED
RESIDUAL SOIL
E
SM
CH
CH
M ~
wP -
M >
wP
M >
wP
D - M
U50
0.70m
U501.15m
U501.45m
0.50m
1.00m
1.30m
FILL-TOPSOIL: Silty SAND - fine to coarse grained,grey, fines of low plasticity, with fine to mediumgrained sub-rounded to sub-angular gravel, rootaffected.
FILL: Sandy CLAY - medium to high plasticity, greyto dark grey, with some red-brown and palegrey-white, fine to coarse grained sand, with somefine to coarse grained sub-angular gravel, trace claypockets.
CLAY - medium to high plasticity, grey andred-brown.
Hole Terminated at 2.00 m
HP 450
HP 500
HP 250-
530
HP 250-
550
HP 550
HP 230
HP 250
HP 280
HP 280
Not
Enc
ount
ered
Field Test
PID Photoionisation detector reading (ppm)DCP(x-y) Dynamic penetrometer test (test depth interval shown)
HP Hand Penetrometer test (UCS kPa)
Material description and profile information
UCS (kPa)D DryM MoistW WetWp Plastic LimitWL Liquid Limit
Field Tests
Notes, Samples and Tests
Structure and additionalobservations
ME
TH
OD
CLA
SS
IFIC
AT
ION
SY
MB
OL
Tes
t T
ype
MO
IST
UR
EC
ON
DIT
ION
CO
NS
IST
EN
CY
DE
NS
ITY
Water
WA
TE
R
Gradational ortransitional strataDefinitive or distictstrata change
Strata Changes
RL(m)
GR
AP
HIC
LOGDEPTH
(m)
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
SAMPLES
Water Level
(Date and time shown)
Water Inflow
Water Outflow
VS Very SoftS SoftF FirmSt Stiff
VSt Very StiffH HardFb Friable
U50 50mm Diameter tube sampleCBR Bulk sample for CBR testing
E Environmental sample(Glass jar, sealed and chilled on site)
ASS Acid Sulfate Soil Sample(Plastic bag, air expelled, chilled)
B Bulk Sample
Consistency Moisture Condition
V Very Loose Density Index <15%L Loose Density Index 15 - 35%MD Medium Dense Density Index 35 - 65%D Dense Density Index 65 - 85%VD Very Dense Density Index 85 - 100%
Density
LEGEND:
Res
ult
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION: Soil type, plasticity/particlecharacteristics,colour,minor components
Drilling and Sampling
<2525 - 5050 - 100100 - 200200 - 400>400
QT
LIB
1.1
.GLB
Log
NO
N-C
OR
ED
BO
RE
HO
LE -
TE
ST
PIT
NE
W15
P-0
033K
LO
GS
.GP
J <
<D
raw
ingF
ile>
> 0
4/05
/202
0 19
:35
10.
0.00
0 D
atge
l Lab
and
In S
itu T
ool
CLIENT: McCLOY DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT PTY LTD
PROJECT: STAGE 9, THE BOWER
LOCATION: CAROLINA ROAD, MEDOWIE
ENGINEERING LOG - TEST PIT
EQUIPMENT TYPE: 2.7 TONNE EXCAVATOR
TEST PIT LENGTH: 2.0 m WIDTH: 0.5 m
TEST PIT NO: TP911APAGE: 1 OF 1
JOB NO: NEW15P-0033K
LOGGED BY: BE
DATE: 17/4/20
SURFACE RL:
DATUM:
VSt -H
St -VSt
0.10m
1.60m
2.00m
FILL: TOPSOIL
FILL - CONTROLLED
RESIDUAL SOIL
E
SM
CH
CH
M ~
wP
M >
wP
D - M
U500.65m
U50
1.30m
0.50m
1.10m
FILL-TOPSOIL: Silty SAND - fine to coarse grained,grey, fines of low plasticity, with fine to mediumgrained sub-rounded to sub-angular gravel, rootaffected.
FILL: Sandy CLAY - medium to high plasticity, greyto dark grey, with some red-brown and palegrey-white, fine to coarse grained sand, with somefine to coarse grained sub-angular gravel, trace claypockets.
CLAY - medium to high plasticity, grey, trace orangeto red-brown.
Hole Terminated at 2.00 m
HP 380-
450
HP 300-
410
HP 350-
420
HP 210
HP 200
Not
Enc
ount
ered
Field Test
PID Photoionisation detector reading (ppm)DCP(x-y) Dynamic penetrometer test (test depth interval shown)
HP Hand Penetrometer test (UCS kPa)
Material description and profile information
UCS (kPa)D DryM MoistW WetWp Plastic LimitWL Liquid Limit
Field Tests
Notes, Samples and Tests
Structure and additionalobservations
ME
TH
OD
CLA
SS
IFIC
AT
ION
SY
MB
OL
Tes
t T
ype
MO
IST
UR
EC
ON
DIT
ION
CO
NS
IST
EN
CY
DE
NS
ITY
Water
WA
TE
R
Gradational ortransitional strataDefinitive or distictstrata change
Strata Changes
RL(m)
GR
AP
HIC
LOGDEPTH
(m)
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
SAMPLES
Water Level
(Date and time shown)
Water Inflow
Water Outflow
VS Very SoftS SoftF FirmSt Stiff
VSt Very StiffH HardFb Friable
U50 50mm Diameter tube sampleCBR Bulk sample for CBR testing
E Environmental sample(Glass jar, sealed and chilled on site)
ASS Acid Sulfate Soil Sample(Plastic bag, air expelled, chilled)
B Bulk Sample
Consistency Moisture Condition
V Very Loose Density Index <15%L Loose Density Index 15 - 35%MD Medium Dense Density Index 35 - 65%D Dense Density Index 65 - 85%VD Very Dense Density Index 85 - 100%
Density
LEGEND:
Res
ult
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION: Soil type, plasticity/particlecharacteristics,colour,minor components
Drilling and Sampling
<2525 - 5050 - 100100 - 200200 - 400>400
QT
LIB
1.1
.GLB
Log
NO
N-C
OR
ED
BO
RE
HO
LE -
TE
ST
PIT
NE
W15
P-0
033K
LO
GS
.GP
J <
<D
raw
ingF
ile>
> 0
4/05
/202
0 19
:35
10.
0.00
0 D
atge
l Lab
and
In S
itu T
ool
CLIENT: McCLOY DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT PTY LTD
PROJECT: STAGE 9, THE BOWER
LOCATION: CAROLINA ROAD, MEDOWIE
ENGINEERING LOG - TEST PIT
EQUIPMENT TYPE: 2.7 TONNE EXCAVATOR
TEST PIT LENGTH: 2.0 m WIDTH: 0.5 m
TEST PIT NO: TP912APAGE: 1 OF 1
JOB NO: NEW15P-0033K
LOGGED BY: BE
DATE: 17/4/20
SURFACE RL:
DATUM:
St -VSt
1.40m
1.80m
2.00m
FILL - CONTROLLED
E
CH
CL
CH
M >
wP
U50
0.90m
U50
1.60m
0.60m
1.40m
FILL: Sandy CLAY / CLAY - medium to highplasticity, grey to dark grey and brown, trace palegrey-white and orange, fine to coarse grained sand,with some fine to coarse grained angular tosub-angular gravel.
FILL: Sandy CLAY - low to medium plasticity, darkgrey-brown, fine grained sand, trace fine to mediumgrained angular gravel.
FILL: Sandy CLAY / CLAY - medium to highplasticity, grey to dark grey and brown, trace palegrey-white and orange, fine to coarse grained sand,with some fine to coarse grained angular tosub-angular gravel.
Hole Terminated at 2.00 m
HP 180-
380
HP 190-
350
HP 220-
280
HP 160-
350
Not
Enc
ount
ered
Field Test
PID Photoionisation detector reading (ppm)DCP(x-y) Dynamic penetrometer test (test depth interval shown)
HP Hand Penetrometer test (UCS kPa)
Material description and profile information
UCS (kPa)D DryM MoistW WetWp Plastic LimitWL Liquid Limit
Field Tests
Notes, Samples and Tests
Structure and additionalobservations
ME
TH
OD
CLA
SS
IFIC
AT
ION
SY
MB
OL
Tes
t T
ype
MO
IST
UR
EC
ON
DIT
ION
CO
NS
IST
EN
CY
DE
NS
ITY
Water
WA
TE
R
Gradational ortransitional strataDefinitive or distictstrata change
Strata Changes
RL(m)
GR
AP
HIC
LOGDEPTH
(m)
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
SAMPLES
Water Level
(Date and time shown)
Water Inflow
Water Outflow
VS Very SoftS SoftF FirmSt Stiff
VSt Very StiffH HardFb Friable
U50 50mm Diameter tube sampleCBR Bulk sample for CBR testing
E Environmental sample(Glass jar, sealed and chilled on site)
ASS Acid Sulfate Soil Sample(Plastic bag, air expelled, chilled)
B Bulk Sample
Consistency Moisture Condition
V Very Loose Density Index <15%L Loose Density Index 15 - 35%MD Medium Dense Density Index 35 - 65%D Dense Density Index 65 - 85%VD Very Dense Density Index 85 - 100%
Density
LEGEND:
Res
ult
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION: Soil type, plasticity/particlecharacteristics,colour,minor components
Drilling and Sampling
<2525 - 5050 - 100100 - 200200 - 400>400
QT
LIB
1.1
.GLB
Log
NO
N-C
OR
ED
BO
RE
HO
LE -
TE
ST
PIT
NE
W15
P-0
033K
LO
GS
.GP
J <
<D
raw
ingF
ile>
> 0
4/05
/202
0 19
:35
10.
0.00
0 D
atge
l Lab
and
In S
itu T
ool
CLIENT: McCLOY DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT PTY LTD
PROJECT: STAGE 9, THE BOWER
LOCATION: CAROLINA ROAD, MEDOWIE
ENGINEERING LOG - TEST PIT
EQUIPMENT TYPE: 2.7 TONNE EXCAVATOR
TEST PIT LENGTH: 2.0 m WIDTH: 0.5 m
TEST PIT NO: TP913APAGE: 1 OF 1
JOB NO: NEW15P-0033K
LOGGED BY: BE
DATE: 17/4/20
SURFACE RL:
DATUM:
VSt
St -VSt
1.80m
2.00m
2.10m
FILL - CONTROLLED
E
CH
CL
CH
M >
wP
U500.85m
0.70m
FILL: Sandy CLAY / CLAY - medium to highplasticity, grey to dark grey and brown, trace palegrey-white and orange, fine to coarse grained sand,with some fine to coarse grained angular tosub-angular gravel.
FILL: Sandy CLAY - low to medium plasticity, darkgrey-brown, fine grained sand, trace fine to mediumgrained angular gravel.
FILL: Sandy CLAY / CLAY - medium to highplasticity, grey to dark grey and brown, trace palegrey-white and orange, fine to coarse grained sand,with some fine to coarse grained angular tosub-angular gravel.
Hole Terminated at 2.10 m
HP 200-
350
HP 250-
380
HP 210-
380
HP 250-
350
HP 180-
210
Not
Enc
ount
ered
Field Test
PID Photoionisation detector reading (ppm)DCP(x-y) Dynamic penetrometer test (test depth interval shown)
HP Hand Penetrometer test (UCS kPa)
Material description and profile information
UCS (kPa)D DryM MoistW WetWp Plastic LimitWL Liquid Limit
Field Tests
Notes, Samples and Tests
Structure and additionalobservations
ME
TH
OD
CLA
SS
IFIC
AT
ION
SY
MB
OL
Tes
t T
ype
MO
IST
UR
EC
ON
DIT
ION
CO
NS
IST
EN
CY
DE
NS
ITY
Water
WA
TE
R
Gradational ortransitional strataDefinitive or distictstrata change
Strata Changes
RL(m)
GR
AP
HIC
LOGDEPTH
(m)
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
SAMPLES
Water Level
(Date and time shown)
Water Inflow
Water Outflow
VS Very SoftS SoftF FirmSt Stiff
VSt Very StiffH HardFb Friable
U50 50mm Diameter tube sampleCBR Bulk sample for CBR testing
E Environmental sample(Glass jar, sealed and chilled on site)
ASS Acid Sulfate Soil Sample(Plastic bag, air expelled, chilled)
B Bulk Sample
Consistency Moisture Condition
V Very Loose Density Index <15%L Loose Density Index 15 - 35%MD Medium Dense Density Index 35 - 65%D Dense Density Index 65 - 85%VD Very Dense Density Index 85 - 100%
Density
LEGEND:
Res
ult
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION: Soil type, plasticity/particlecharacteristics,colour,minor components
Drilling and Sampling
<2525 - 5050 - 100100 - 200200 - 400>400
QT
LIB
1.1
.GLB
Log
NO
N-C
OR
ED
BO
RE
HO
LE -
TE
ST
PIT
NE
W15
P-0
033K
LO
GS
.GP
J <
<D
raw
ingF
ile>
> 0
4/05
/202
0 19
:35
10.
0.00
0 D
atge
l Lab
and
In S
itu T
ool
CLIENT: McCLOY DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT PTY LTD
PROJECT: STAGE 9, THE BOWER
LOCATION: CAROLINA ROAD, MEDOWIE
ENGINEERING LOG - TEST PIT
EQUIPMENT TYPE: 2.7 TONNE EXCAVATOR
TEST PIT LENGTH: 2.0 m WIDTH: 0.5 m
TEST PIT NO: TP914APAGE: 1 OF 1
JOB NO: NEW15P-0033K
LOGGED BY: BE
DATE: 17/4/20
SURFACE RL:
DATUM:
St -VSt
MD
H
1.30m
1.50m
1.60m
2.00m
FILL - CONTROLLED
RESIDUAL SOIL
E
CH
CH
GC
CH
M >
wP
M >
wP
M
U500.65m
U501.25m
0.50m
1.10m
FILL: Sandy CLAY - medium to high plasticity, greyto dark grey, with some red-brown and palegrey-white, fine to coarse grained sand, with somefine to coarse grained sub-angular gravel.
FILL: CLAY - medium to high plasticity, grey-brown,with some orange, with some fine to coarse grainedsand, trace fine to coarse grained angular gravel.
FILL: Clayey Sandy GRAVEL - fine to coarsegrained, angular to sub-angular, grey to palegrey-white and brown to orange, fine to coarsegrained sand, fines of medium to high plasticity.
CLAY - medium to high plasticity, grey-brown, withsome orange, with some fine to coarse grained sand,trace fine to coarse grained angular gravel.
Hole Terminated at 2.00 m
HP 240-
350
HP 200-
350
HP 300-
390
HP 260-
350
HP 180-
380
HP 400
HP 410
Not
Enc
ount
ered
Field Test
PID Photoionisation detector reading (ppm)DCP(x-y) Dynamic penetrometer test (test depth interval shown)
HP Hand Penetrometer test (UCS kPa)
Material description and profile information
UCS (kPa)D DryM MoistW WetWp Plastic LimitWL Liquid Limit
Field Tests
Notes, Samples and Tests
Structure and additionalobservations
ME
TH
OD
CLA
SS
IFIC
AT
ION
SY
MB
OL
Tes
t T
ype
MO
IST
UR
EC
ON
DIT
ION
CO
NS
IST
EN
CY
DE
NS
ITY
Water
WA
TE
R
Gradational ortransitional strataDefinitive or distictstrata change
Strata Changes
RL(m)
GR
AP
HIC
LOGDEPTH
(m)
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
SAMPLES
Water Level
(Date and time shown)
Water Inflow
Water Outflow
VS Very SoftS SoftF FirmSt Stiff
VSt Very StiffH HardFb Friable
U50 50mm Diameter tube sampleCBR Bulk sample for CBR testing
E Environmental sample(Glass jar, sealed and chilled on site)
ASS Acid Sulfate Soil Sample(Plastic bag, air expelled, chilled)
B Bulk Sample
Consistency Moisture Condition
V Very Loose Density Index <15%L Loose Density Index 15 - 35%MD Medium Dense Density Index 35 - 65%D Dense Density Index 65 - 85%VD Very Dense Density Index 85 - 100%
Density
LEGEND:
Res
ult
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION: Soil type, plasticity/particlecharacteristics,colour,minor components
Drilling and Sampling
<2525 - 5050 - 100100 - 200200 - 400>400
QT
LIB
1.1
.GLB
Log
NO
N-C
OR
ED
BO
RE
HO
LE -
TE
ST
PIT
NE
W15
P-0
033K
LO
GS
.GP
J <
<D
raw
ingF
ile>
> 0
4/05
/202
0 19
:35
10.
0.00
0 D
atge
l Lab
and
In S
itu T
ool
CLIENT: McCLOY DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT PTY LTD
PROJECT: STAGE 9, THE BOWER
LOCATION: CAROLINA ROAD, MEDOWIE
ENGINEERING LOG - TEST PIT
EQUIPMENT TYPE: 2.7 TONNE EXCAVATOR
TEST PIT LENGTH: 2.0 m WIDTH: 0.5 m
TEST PIT NO: TP915APAGE: 1 OF 1
JOB NO: NEW15P-0033K
LOGGED BY: BE
DATE: 17/4/20
SURFACE RL:
DATUM:
H
VSt
St
0.15m
1.20m
2.00m
FILL: TOPSOIL
FILL - CONTROLLED
RESIDUAL SOIL
E
SM
CH
CH
M ~
wP
M >
wP
D - M
U500.65m
U501.35m
0.50m
1.20m
FILL-TOPSOIL: Silty SAND - fine to coarse grained,grey, fines of low plasticity, with fine to mediumgrained sub-rounded to sub-angular gravel, rootaffected.
FILL: Sandy CLAY - medium to high plasticity, greyto dark grey, with some red-brown and palegrey-white, trace orange, fine to coarse grainedsand, with some fine to coarse grained sub-angulargravel.
CLAY - medium to high plasticity, grey, with someorange to red-brown.
Hole Terminated at 2.00 m
HP 450
HP 300-
350
HP 310-
390
HP 250
HP 230
HP 200
HP 150
HP 150
Not
Enc
ount
ered
Field Test
PID Photoionisation detector reading (ppm)DCP(x-y) Dynamic penetrometer test (test depth interval shown)
HP Hand Penetrometer test (UCS kPa)
Material description and profile information
UCS (kPa)D DryM MoistW WetWp Plastic LimitWL Liquid Limit
Field Tests
Notes, Samples and Tests
Structure and additionalobservations
ME
TH
OD
CLA
SS
IFIC
AT
ION
SY
MB
OL
Tes
t T
ype
MO
IST
UR
EC
ON
DIT
ION
CO
NS
IST
EN
CY
DE
NS
ITY
Water
WA
TE
R
Gradational ortransitional strataDefinitive or distictstrata change
Strata Changes
RL(m)
GR
AP
HIC
LOGDEPTH
(m)
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
SAMPLES
Water Level
(Date and time shown)
Water Inflow
Water Outflow
VS Very SoftS SoftF FirmSt Stiff
VSt Very StiffH HardFb Friable
U50 50mm Diameter tube sampleCBR Bulk sample for CBR testing
E Environmental sample(Glass jar, sealed and chilled on site)
ASS Acid Sulfate Soil Sample(Plastic bag, air expelled, chilled)
B Bulk Sample
Consistency Moisture Condition
V Very Loose Density Index <15%L Loose Density Index 15 - 35%MD Medium Dense Density Index 35 - 65%D Dense Density Index 65 - 85%VD Very Dense Density Index 85 - 100%
Density
LEGEND:
Res
ult
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION: Soil type, plasticity/particlecharacteristics,colour,minor components
Drilling and Sampling
<2525 - 5050 - 100100 - 200200 - 400>400
QT
LIB
1.1
.GLB
Log
NO
N-C
OR
ED
BO
RE
HO
LE -
TE
ST
PIT
NE
W15
P-0
033K
LO
GS
.GP
J <
<D
raw
ingF
ile>
> 0
4/05
/202
0 19
:35
10.
0.00
0 D
atge
l Lab
and
In S
itu T
ool
CLIENT: McCLOY DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT PTY LTD
PROJECT: STAGE 9, THE BOWER
LOCATION: CAROLINA ROAD, MEDOWIE
ENGINEERING LOG - TEST PIT
EQUIPMENT TYPE: 2.7 TONNE EXCAVATOR
TEST PIT LENGTH: 2.0 m WIDTH: 0.5 m
TEST PIT NO: TP916APAGE: 1 OF 1
JOB NO: NEW15P-0033K
LOGGED BY: BE
DATE: 17/4/20
SURFACE RL:
DATUM:
VSt
0.15m
1.00m
1.10m
2.00m
FILL: TOPSOIL
FILL - CONTROLLED
COLLUVIUM
RESIDUAL SOIL
E
SM
CH
CH
CH
M >
wP
D - M
U500.75m
U50
1.30m
0.60m
1.10m
FILL-TOPSOIL: Silty SAND - fine to coarse grained,grey, fines of low plasticity, with fine to mediumgrained sub-rounded to sub-angular gravel, rootaffected.
FILL: Sandy CLAY - medium to high plasticity, greyto dark grey, with some red-brown to orange andbrown, trace pale grey-white, fine to coarse grainedsand, with some fine to coarse grained sub-angulargravel, trace angular cobbles.
CLAY - medium to high plasticity, brown andgrey-brown, trace tree roots.
CLAY - medium to high plasticity, grey, with someorange to red-brown.
Hole Terminated at 2.00 m
HP 300-
380HP 210
-300
HP 230-
300
HP 220
HP 230
HP 210
HP 240
HP 250
Not
Enc
ount
ered
Field Test
PID Photoionisation detector reading (ppm)DCP(x-y) Dynamic penetrometer test (test depth interval shown)
HP Hand Penetrometer test (UCS kPa)
Material description and profile information
UCS (kPa)D DryM MoistW WetWp Plastic LimitWL Liquid Limit
Field Tests
Notes, Samples and Tests
Structure and additionalobservations
ME
TH
OD
CLA
SS
IFIC
AT
ION
SY
MB
OL
Tes
t T
ype
MO
IST
UR
EC
ON
DIT
ION
CO
NS
IST
EN
CY
DE
NS
ITY
Water
WA
TE
R
Gradational ortransitional strataDefinitive or distictstrata change
Strata Changes
RL(m)
GR
AP
HIC
LOGDEPTH
(m)
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
SAMPLES
Water Level
(Date and time shown)
Water Inflow
Water Outflow
VS Very SoftS SoftF FirmSt Stiff
VSt Very StiffH HardFb Friable
U50 50mm Diameter tube sampleCBR Bulk sample for CBR testing
E Environmental sample(Glass jar, sealed and chilled on site)
ASS Acid Sulfate Soil Sample(Plastic bag, air expelled, chilled)
B Bulk Sample
Consistency Moisture Condition
V Very Loose Density Index <15%L Loose Density Index 15 - 35%MD Medium Dense Density Index 35 - 65%D Dense Density Index 65 - 85%VD Very Dense Density Index 85 - 100%
Density
LEGEND:
Res
ult
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION: Soil type, plasticity/particlecharacteristics,colour,minor components
Drilling and Sampling
<2525 - 5050 - 100100 - 200200 - 400>400
QT
LIB
1.1
.GLB
Log
NO
N-C
OR
ED
BO
RE
HO
LE -
TE
ST
PIT
NE
W15
P-0
033K
LO
GS
.GP
J <
<D
raw
ingF
ile>
> 0
4/05
/202
0 19
:35
10.
0.00
0 D
atge
l Lab
and
In S
itu T
ool
CLIENT: McCLOY DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT PTY LTD
PROJECT: STAGE 9, THE BOWER
LOCATION: CAROLINA ROAD, MEDOWIE
ENGINEERING LOG - TEST PIT
EQUIPMENT TYPE: 2.7 TONNE EXCAVATOR
TEST PIT LENGTH: 2.0 m WIDTH: 0.5 m
TEST PIT NO: TP917APAGE: 1 OF 1
JOB NO: NEW15P-0033K
LOGGED BY: BE
DATE: 17/4/20
SURFACE RL:
DATUM:
St
0.20m
0.70m0.71m
TOPSOIL
RESIDUAL SOIL
REFUSAL ON WEATHEREDROCK AT 0.4M FROMEXISTING GROUND LEVELON SOUTHERN SIDE OFTEST PIT.
HIGHLY WEATHEREDROCK
E
CL
CH
M ~
wP
M >
wP
D
TOPSOIL: Sandy CLAY - low to medium plasticity,dark grey to grey-brown, fine grained sand, rootaffected.
CLAY - medium to high plasticity, pale grey, traceorange.
Sandy SILTSTONE - fine grained, pale grey-white todark grey and orange to brown, estimated mediumstrength.Hole Terminated at 0.71 mRefusal
Not
Enc
ount
ered
Field Test
PID Photoionisation detector reading (ppm)DCP(x-y) Dynamic penetrometer test (test depth interval shown)
HP Hand Penetrometer test (UCS kPa)
Material description and profile information
UCS (kPa)D DryM MoistW WetWp Plastic LimitWL Liquid Limit
Field Tests
Notes, Samples and Tests
Structure and additionalobservations
ME
TH
OD
CLA
SS
IFIC
AT
ION
SY
MB
OL
Tes
t T
ype
MO
IST
UR
EC
ON
DIT
ION
CO
NS
IST
EN
CY
DE
NS
ITY
Water
WA
TE
R
Gradational ortransitional strataDefinitive or distictstrata change
Strata Changes
RL(m)
GR
AP
HIC
LOGDEPTH
(m)
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
SAMPLES
Water Level
(Date and time shown)
Water Inflow
Water Outflow
VS Very SoftS SoftF FirmSt Stiff
VSt Very StiffH HardFb Friable
U50 50mm Diameter tube sampleCBR Bulk sample for CBR testing
E Environmental sample(Glass jar, sealed and chilled on site)
ASS Acid Sulfate Soil Sample(Plastic bag, air expelled, chilled)
B Bulk Sample
Consistency Moisture Condition
V Very Loose Density Index <15%L Loose Density Index 15 - 35%MD Medium Dense Density Index 35 - 65%D Dense Density Index 65 - 85%VD Very Dense Density Index 85 - 100%
Density
LEGEND:
Res
ult
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION: Soil type, plasticity/particlecharacteristics,colour,minor components
Drilling and Sampling
<2525 - 5050 - 100100 - 200200 - 400>400
QT
LIB
1.1
.GLB
Log
NO
N-C
OR
ED
BO
RE
HO
LE -
TE
ST
PIT
NE
W15
P-0
033K
LO
GS
.GP
J <
<D
raw
ingF
ile>
> 0
4/05
/202
0 19
:35
10.
0.00
0 D
atge
l Lab
and
In S
itu T
ool
CLIENT: McCLOY DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT PTY LTD
PROJECT: STAGE 9, THE BOWER
LOCATION: CAROLINA ROAD, MEDOWIE
ENGINEERING LOG - TEST PIT
EQUIPMENT TYPE: 2.7 TONNE EXCAVATOR
TEST PIT LENGTH: 2.0 m WIDTH: 0.5 m
TEST PIT NO: TP918APAGE: 1 OF 1
JOB NO: NEW15P-0033K
LOGGED BY: BE
DATE: 17/4/20
SURFACE RL:
DATUM:
St -VSt
St
0.50m
0.60m
FILL - CONTROLLED
RESIDUAL SOIL
E
CH
CH
M >
wP
FILL: Sandy CLAY - medium to high plasticity, greyto dark grey, with some red-brown and palegrey-white, trace orange, fine to coarse grainedsand, with some fine to coarse grained sub-angulargravel.
CLAY - medium to high plasticity, grey, with someorange to red-brown.
Hole Terminated at 0.60 m
Not
Enc
ount
ered
Field Test
PID Photoionisation detector reading (ppm)DCP(x-y) Dynamic penetrometer test (test depth interval shown)
HP Hand Penetrometer test (UCS kPa)
Material description and profile information
UCS (kPa)D DryM MoistW WetWp Plastic LimitWL Liquid Limit
Field Tests
Notes, Samples and Tests
Structure and additionalobservations
ME
TH
OD
CLA
SS
IFIC
AT
ION
SY
MB
OL
Tes
t T
ype
MO
IST
UR
EC
ON
DIT
ION
CO
NS
IST
EN
CY
DE
NS
ITY
Water
WA
TE
R
Gradational ortransitional strataDefinitive or distictstrata change
Strata Changes
RL(m)
GR
AP
HIC
LOGDEPTH
(m)
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
SAMPLES
Water Level
(Date and time shown)
Water Inflow
Water Outflow
VS Very SoftS SoftF FirmSt Stiff
VSt Very StiffH HardFb Friable
U50 50mm Diameter tube sampleCBR Bulk sample for CBR testing
E Environmental sample(Glass jar, sealed and chilled on site)
ASS Acid Sulfate Soil Sample(Plastic bag, air expelled, chilled)
B Bulk Sample
Consistency Moisture Condition
V Very Loose Density Index <15%L Loose Density Index 15 - 35%MD Medium Dense Density Index 35 - 65%D Dense Density Index 65 - 85%VD Very Dense Density Index 85 - 100%
Density
LEGEND:
Res
ult
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION: Soil type, plasticity/particlecharacteristics,colour,minor components
Drilling and Sampling
<2525 - 5050 - 100100 - 200200 - 400>400
QT
LIB
1.1
.GLB
Log
NO
N-C
OR
ED
BO
RE
HO
LE -
TE
ST
PIT
NE
W15
P-0
033K
LO
GS
.GP
J <
<D
raw
ingF
ile>
> 0
4/05
/202
0 19
:35
10.
0.00
0 D
atge
l Lab
and
In S
itu T
ool
CLIENT: McCLOY DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT PTY LTD
PROJECT: STAGE 9, THE BOWER
LOCATION: CAROLINA ROAD, MEDOWIE
ENGINEERING LOG - TEST PIT
EQUIPMENT TYPE: 2.7 TONNE EXCAVATOR
TEST PIT LENGTH: 2.0 m WIDTH: 0.5 m
TEST PIT NO: TP919APAGE: 1 OF 1
JOB NO: NEW15P-0033K
LOGGED BY: BE
DATE: 17/4/20
SURFACE RL:
DATUM:
APPENDIX B:
Results of Laboratory Testing
Sample DetailsSample ID: NEW20W-1438--S01 Client Sample ID:Test Request No.: Sampling Method: Sampled by Engineering DepartmentMaterial: Clay Date Sampled: 16/04/2020Source: On Site Date Submitted: 21/04/2020Specification: No SpecificationProject Location: Boundary Road, Medowie, NSWSample Location: TP901A - (0.5 - 0.65m)Borehole Number: TP901ABorehole Depth (m): 0.5 - 0.65
Shrink Test AS 1289.7.1.1Shrink on drying (%): 7.4Shrinkage Moisture Content (%): 29.1Est. inert material (%): <1Crumbling during shrinkage: NilCracking during shrinkage: Minor
Swell Test AS 1289.7.1.1Swell on Saturation (%): -0.7Moisture Content before (%): 28.2Moisture Content after (%): 28.5Est. Unc. Comp. Strength before (kPa): 230Est. Unc. Comp. Strength after (kPa): 200Shrink Swell
Shrink Swell Index - Iss (%): 4.1
Accredited for compliance with ISO/IEC 17025-Testing.The results of the tests, calibrations and/or measurements included inthis document are traceable to Australian/national standards. Results provided relate only to the items tested or sampled.This report shall not be reproduced except in full.
29/04/2020
Shrink Swell Index ReportReport No: SSI:NEW20W-1438--S01
Issue No: 1
Client:
Date of Issue:NATA Accredited Laboratory Number: 18686Approved Signatory: Dane Cullen(Senior Geotechnician)Project Name: Stage 9 The Bower
F: 02 4960 9775
QUALTEST Laboratory (NSW) Pty Ltd (20708) T: 02 4968 4468E: [email protected]: www.qualtest.com.auABN: 98 153 268 896
8 Ironbark Close Warabrook NSW 2304
Project No.: NEW15P-0033KPrincipal:
Suite 2, Ground Floor, 317 Hunter StreetNewcastle NSW 2300McCloy Development Management Pty Ltd
Page 1 of 1Form No: 18932, Report No: SSI:NEW20W-1438--S01 © 2000-2018 QESTLab by SpectraQEST.com
Comments
Sample DetailsSample ID: NEW20W-1438--S02 Client Sample ID:Test Request No.: Sampling Method: Sampled by Engineering DepartmentMaterial: Clay Date Sampled: 16/04/2020Source: On Site Date Submitted: 21/04/2020Specification: No SpecificationProject Location: Boundary Road, Medowie, NSWSample Location: TP902A - (1.00 - 1.15m)Borehole Number: TP902ABorehole Depth (m): 1.00 - 1.15
Shrink Test AS 1289.7.1.1Shrink on drying (%): 5.4Shrinkage Moisture Content (%): 29.6Est. inert material (%): <1Crumbling during shrinkage: NILCracking during shrinkage: Minor
Swell Test AS 1289.7.1.1Swell on Saturation (%): -0.7Moisture Content before (%): 29.1Moisture Content after (%): 32.7Est. Unc. Comp. Strength before (kPa): 420Est. Unc. Comp. Strength after (kPa): 360Shrink Swell
Shrink Swell Index - Iss (%): 3.0
Shrink Swell Index ReportReport No: SSI:NEW20W-1438--S02
Issue No: 1
Client:
Date of Issue:Project Name: Stage 9 The Bower
F: 02 4960 9775
QUALTEST Laboratory (NSW) Pty Ltd (20708) T: 02 4968 4468E: [email protected]: www.qualtest.com.auABN: 98 153 268 896
8 Ironbark Close Warabrook NSW 2304
Project No.: NEW15P-0033KPrincipal:
Suite 2, Ground Floor, 317 Hunter StreetNewcastle NSW 2300McCloy Development Management Pty Ltd
Page 1 of 1Form No: 18932, Report No: SSI:NEW20W-1438--S02 © 2000-2018 QESTLab by SpectraQEST.com
Comments
Sample DetailsSample ID: NEW20W-1438--S03 Client Sample ID:Test Request No.: Sampling Method: Sampled by Engineering DepartmentMaterial: Clay Date Sampled: 16/04/2020Source: On Site Date Submitted: 21/04/2020Specification: No SpecificationProject Location: Boundary Road, Medowie, NSWSample Location: TP903A - (0.6 - 0.72m)Borehole Number: TP903ABorehole Depth (m): 0.6 - 0.72
Shrink Test AS 1289.7.1.1Shrink on drying (%): 7.2Shrinkage Moisture Content (%): 30.0Est. inert material (%): <1Crumbling during shrinkage: NilCracking during shrinkage: NIL
Swell Test AS 1289.7.1.1Swell on Saturation (%): -1.1Moisture Content before (%): 29.3Moisture Content after (%): 31.9Est. Unc. Comp. Strength before (kPa): 250Est. Unc. Comp. Strength after (kPa): 240Shrink Swell
Shrink Swell Index - Iss (%): 4.0
Accredited for compliance with ISO/IEC 17025-Testing.The results of the tests, calibrations and/or measurements included inthis document are traceable to Australian/national standards. Results provided relate only to the items tested or sampled.This report shall not be reproduced except in full.
29/04/2020
Shrink Swell Index ReportReport No: SSI:NEW20W-1438--S03
Issue No: 1
Client:
Date of Issue:NATA Accredited Laboratory Number: 18686Approved Signatory: Dane Cullen(Senior Geotechnician)Project Name: Stage 9 The Bower
F: 02 4960 9775
QUALTEST Laboratory (NSW) Pty Ltd (20708) T: 02 4968 4468E: [email protected]: www.qualtest.com.auABN: 98 153 268 896
8 Ironbark Close Warabrook NSW 2304
Project No.: NEW15P-0033KPrincipal:
Suite 2, Ground Floor, 317 Hunter StreetNewcastle NSW 2300McCloy Development Management Pty Ltd
Page 1 of 1Form No: 18932, Report No: SSI:NEW20W-1438--S03 © 2000-2018 QESTLab by SpectraQEST.com
Comments
Sample DetailsSample ID: NEW20W-1438--S04 Client Sample ID:Test Request No.: Sampling Method: Sampled by Engineering DepartmentMaterial: Clay Date Sampled: 16/04/2020Source: On Site Date Submitted: 21/04/2020Specification: No SpecificationProject Location: Boundary Road, Medowie, NSWSample Location: TP904A - (1.0 - 1.15m)Borehole Number: TP904ABorehole Depth (m): 1.0 - 1.15
Shrink Test AS 1289.7.1.1Shrink on drying (%): 7.5Shrinkage Moisture Content (%): 32.8Est. inert material (%): 3Crumbling during shrinkage: NilCracking during shrinkage: Minor
Swell Test AS 1289.7.1.1Swell on Saturation (%): -0.9Moisture Content before (%): 32.6Moisture Content after (%): 37.5Est. Unc. Comp. Strength before (kPa): 160Est. Unc. Comp. Strength after (kPa): 100Shrink Swell
Shrink Swell Index - Iss (%): 4.2
Accredited for compliance with ISO/IEC 17025-Testing.The results of the tests, calibrations and/or measurements included inthis document are traceable to Australian/national standards. Results provided relate only to the items tested or sampled.This report shall not be reproduced except in full.
29/04/2020
Shrink Swell Index ReportReport No: SSI:NEW20W-1438--S04
Issue No: 1
Client:
Date of Issue:NATA Accredited Laboratory Number: 18686Approved Signatory: Dane Cullen(Senior Geotechnician)Project Name: Stage 9 The Bower
F: 02 4960 9775
QUALTEST Laboratory (NSW) Pty Ltd (20708) T: 02 4968 4468E: [email protected]: www.qualtest.com.auABN: 98 153 268 896
8 Ironbark Close Warabrook NSW 2304
Project No.: NEW15P-0033KPrincipal:
Suite 2, Ground Floor, 317 Hunter StreetNewcastle NSW 2300McCloy Development Management Pty Ltd
Page 1 of 1Form No: 18932, Report No: SSI:NEW20W-1438--S04 © 2000-2018 QESTLab by SpectraQEST.com
Comments
Sample DetailsSample ID: NEW20W-1438--S05 Client Sample ID: -Test Request No.: - Sampling Method: Sampled by Engineering DepartmentMaterial: Clay Date Sampled: 16/04/2020Source: On Site Date Submitted: 21/04/2020Specification: No SpecificationProject Location: Boundary Road, Medowie, NSWSample Location: TP905A - (0.5 - 0.75m)Borehole Number: TP905ABorehole Depth (m): 0.5 - 0.75
Shrink Test AS 1289.7.1.1Shrink on drying (%): 4.1Shrinkage Moisture Content (%): 21.3Est. inert material (%): <1%Crumbling during shrinkage: NilCracking during shrinkage: Major
Swell Test AS 1289.7.1.1Swell on Saturation (%): 1.3Moisture Content before (%): 23.4Moisture Content after (%): 29.2Est. Unc. Comp. Strength before (kPa): 140Est. Unc. Comp. Strength after (kPa): 20Shrink Swell
Shrink Swell Index - Iss (%): 2.6
Accredited for compliance with ISO/IEC 17025-Testing.The results of the tests, calibrations and/or measurements included inthis document are traceable to Australian/national standards. Results provided relate only to the items tested or sampled.This report shall not be reproduced except in full.
30/04/2020
Shrink Swell Index ReportReport No: SSI:NEW20W-1438--S05
Issue No: 1
Client:
Date of Issue:NATA Accredited Laboratory Number: 18686Approved Signatory: Brent Cullen(Senior Geotechnician)Project Name: Stage 9 The Bower
F: 02 4960 9775
QUALTEST Laboratory (NSW) Pty Ltd (20708) T: 02 4968 4468E: [email protected]: www.qualtest.com.auABN: 98 153 268 896
8 Ironbark Close Warabrook NSW 2304
Project No.: NEW15P-0033KPrincipal:
Suite 2, Ground Floor, 317 Hunter StreetNewcastle NSW 2300McCloy Development Management Pty Ltd
Page 1 of 1Form No: 18932, Report No: SSI:NEW20W-1438--S05 © 2000-2018 QESTLab by SpectraQEST.com
Comments
Sample DetailsSample ID: NEW20W-1438--S06 Client Sample ID:Test Request No.: Sampling Method: Sampled by Engineering DepartmentMaterial: Clay Date Sampled: 16/04/2020Source: On Site Date Submitted: 21/04/2020Specification: No SpecificationProject Location: Boundary Road, Medowie, NSWSample Location: TP905A - (1.1 - 1.4m)Borehole Number: TP905ABorehole Depth (m): 1.1 - 1.4
Shrink Test AS 1289.7.1.1Shrink on drying (%): 5.6Shrinkage Moisture Content (%): 28.6Est. inert material (%): 5Crumbling during shrinkage: NilCracking during shrinkage: Moderate
Swell Test AS 1289.7.1.1Swell on Saturation (%): -0.5Moisture Content before (%): 26.6Moisture Content after (%): 27.8Est. Unc. Comp. Strength before (kPa): 140Est. Unc. Comp. Strength after (kPa): 100Shrink Swell
Shrink Swell Index - Iss (%): 3.1
Accredited for compliance with ISO/IEC 17025-Testing.The results of the tests, calibrations and/or measurements included inthis document are traceable to Australian/national standards. Results provided relate only to the items tested or sampled.This report shall not be reproduced except in full.
29/04/2020
Shrink Swell Index ReportReport No: SSI:NEW20W-1438--S06
Issue No: 1
Client:
Date of Issue:NATA Accredited Laboratory Number: 18686Approved Signatory: Dane Cullen(Senior Geotechnician)Project Name: Stage 9 The Bower
F: 02 4960 9775
QUALTEST Laboratory (NSW) Pty Ltd (20708) T: 02 4968 4468E: [email protected]: www.qualtest.com.auABN: 98 153 268 896
8 Ironbark Close Warabrook NSW 2304
Project No.: NEW15P-0033KPrincipal:
Suite 2, Ground Floor, 317 Hunter StreetNewcastle NSW 2300McCloy Development Management Pty Ltd
Page 1 of 1Form No: 18932, Report No: SSI:NEW20W-1438--S06 © 2000-2018 QESTLab by SpectraQEST.com
Comments
Sample DetailsSample ID: NEW20W-1438--S07 Client Sample ID:Test Request No.: Sampling Method: Sampled by Engineering DepartmentMaterial: Clay Date Sampled: 16/04/2020Source: On Site Date Submitted: 21/04/2020Specification: No SpecificationProject Location: Boundary Road, Medowie, NSWSample Location: TP906A - (0.6 - 0.8m)Borehole Number: TP906ABorehole Depth (m): 0.6 - 0.8
Shrink Test AS 1289.7.1.1Shrink on drying (%): 6.1Shrinkage Moisture Content (%): 36.4Est. inert material (%): 5Crumbling during shrinkage: NilCracking during shrinkage: Moderate
Swell Test AS 1289.7.1.1Swell on Saturation (%): -0.5Moisture Content before (%): 38.0Moisture Content after (%): 43.6Est. Unc. Comp. Strength before (kPa): 120Est. Unc. Comp. Strength after (kPa): 80Shrink Swell
Shrink Swell Index - Iss (%): 3.4
Accredited for compliance with ISO/IEC 17025-Testing.The results of the tests, calibrations and/or measurements included inthis document are traceable to Australian/national standards. Results provided relate only to the items tested or sampled.This report shall not be reproduced except in full.
29/04/2020
Shrink Swell Index ReportReport No: SSI:NEW20W-1438--S07
Issue No: 1
Client:
Date of Issue:NATA Accredited Laboratory Number: 18686Approved Signatory: Dane Cullen(Senior Geotechnician)Project Name: Stage 9 The Bower
F: 02 4960 9775
QUALTEST Laboratory (NSW) Pty Ltd (20708) T: 02 4968 4468E: [email protected]: www.qualtest.com.auABN: 98 153 268 896
8 Ironbark Close Warabrook NSW 2304
Project No.: NEW15P-0033KPrincipal:
Suite 2, Ground Floor, 317 Hunter StreetNewcastle NSW 2300McCloy Development Management Pty Ltd
Page 1 of 1Form No: 18932, Report No: SSI:NEW20W-1438--S07 © 2000-2018 QESTLab by SpectraQEST.com
Comments
Sample DetailsSample ID: NEW20W-1438--S08 Client Sample ID:Test Request No.: Sampling Method: Sampled by Engineering DepartmentMaterial: Clay Date Sampled: 16/04/2020Source: On Site Date Submitted: 21/04/2020Specification: No SpecificationProject Location: Boundary Road, Medowie, NSWSample Location: TP907A - (1.0 - 1.15m)Borehole Number: TP907ABorehole Depth (m): 1.0 - 1.15
Shrink Test AS 1289.7.1.1Shrink on drying (%): 7.9Shrinkage Moisture Content (%): 33.6Est. inert material (%): <1Crumbling during shrinkage: NilCracking during shrinkage: Nil
Swell Test AS 1289.7.1.1Swell on Saturation (%): -0.9Moisture Content before (%): 35.6Moisture Content after (%): 37.7Est. Unc. Comp. Strength before (kPa): 320Est. Unc. Comp. Strength after (kPa): 250Shrink Swell
Shrink Swell Index - Iss (%): 4.4
Accredited for compliance with ISO/IEC 17025-Testing.The results of the tests, calibrations and/or measurements included inthis document are traceable to Australian/national standards. Results provided relate only to the items tested or sampled.This report shall not be reproduced except in full.
29/04/2020
Shrink Swell Index ReportReport No: SSI:NEW20W-1438--S08
Issue No: 1
Client:
Date of Issue:NATA Accredited Laboratory Number: 18686Approved Signatory: Dane Cullen(Senior Geotechnician)Project Name: Stage 9 The Bower
F: 02 4960 9775
QUALTEST Laboratory (NSW) Pty Ltd (20708) T: 02 4968 4468E: [email protected]: www.qualtest.com.auABN: 98 153 268 896
8 Ironbark Close Warabrook NSW 2304
Project No.: NEW15P-0033KPrincipal:
Suite 2, Ground Floor, 317 Hunter StreetNewcastle NSW 2300McCloy Development Management Pty Ltd
Page 1 of 1Form No: 18932, Report No: SSI:NEW20W-1438--S08 © 2000-2018 QESTLab by SpectraQEST.com
Comments
Sample DetailsSample ID: NEW20W-1438--S09 Client Sample ID:Test Request No.: Sampling Method: Sampled by Engineering DepartmentMaterial: Clay Date Sampled: 16/04/2020Source: On Site Date Submitted: 21/04/2020Specification: No SpecificationProject Location: Boundary Road, Medowie, NSWSample Location: TP908A - (0.6 - 0.75m)Borehole Number: TP908ABorehole Depth (m): 0.6 - 0.75
Shrink Test AS 1289.7.1.1Shrink on drying (%): 8.2Shrinkage Moisture Content (%): 28.4Est. inert material (%): <1Crumbling during shrinkage: NilCracking during shrinkage: Nil
Swell Test AS 1289.7.1.1Swell on Saturation (%): -0.5Moisture Content before (%): 29.6Moisture Content after (%): 30.2Est. Unc. Comp. Strength before (kPa): 250Est. Unc. Comp. Strength after (kPa): 200Shrink Swell
Shrink Swell Index - Iss (%): 4.6
Accredited for compliance with ISO/IEC 17025-Testing.The results of the tests, calibrations and/or measurements included inthis document are traceable to Australian/national standards. Results provided relate only to the items tested or sampled.This report shall not be reproduced except in full.
29/04/2020
Shrink Swell Index ReportReport No: SSI:NEW20W-1438--S09
Issue No: 1
Client:
Date of Issue:NATA Accredited Laboratory Number: 18686Approved Signatory: Dane Cullen(Senior Geotechnician)Project Name: Stage 9 The Bower
F: 02 4960 9775
QUALTEST Laboratory (NSW) Pty Ltd (20708) T: 02 4968 4468E: [email protected]: www.qualtest.com.auABN: 98 153 268 896
8 Ironbark Close Warabrook NSW 2304
Project No.: NEW15P-0033KPrincipal:
Suite 2, Ground Floor, 317 Hunter StreetNewcastle NSW 2300McCloy Development Management Pty Ltd
Page 1 of 1Form No: 18932, Report No: SSI:NEW20W-1438--S09 © 2000-2018 QESTLab by SpectraQEST.com
Comments
Sample DetailsSample ID: NEW20W-1438--S10 Client Sample ID: -Test Request No.: - Sampling Method: Sampled by Engineering DepartmentMaterial: Clay Date Sampled: 16/04/2020Source: On Site Date Submitted: 21/04/2020Specification: No SpecificationProject Location: Boundary Road, Medowie, NSWSample Location: TP909A - (0.6 - 0.75m)Borehole Number: TP909ABorehole Depth (m): 0.6 - 0.75
Shrink Test AS 1289.7.1.1Shrink on drying (%): 5.5Shrinkage Moisture Content (%): 29.4Est. inert material (%): <1Crumbling during shrinkage: NilCracking during shrinkage: Moderate
Swell Test AS 1289.7.1.1Swell on Saturation (%): -0.6Moisture Content before (%): 28.4Moisture Content after (%): 29.6Est. Unc. Comp. Strength before (kPa): 270Est. Unc. Comp. Strength after (kPa): 200Shrink Swell
Shrink Swell Index - Iss (%): 3.1
Accredited for compliance with ISO/IEC 17025-Testing.The results of the tests, calibrations and/or measurements included inthis document are traceable to Australian/national standards. Results provided relate only to the items tested or sampled.This report shall not be reproduced except in full.
4/05/2020
Shrink Swell Index ReportReport No: SSI:NEW20W-1438--S10
Issue No: 1
Client:
Date of Issue:NATA Accredited Laboratory Number: 18686Approved Signatory: Dane Cullen(Senior Geotechnician)Project Name: Stage 9 The Bower
F: 02 4960 9775
QUALTEST Laboratory (NSW) Pty Ltd (20708) T: 02 4968 4468E: [email protected]: www.qualtest.com.auABN: 98 153 268 896
8 Ironbark Close Warabrook NSW 2304
Project No.: NEW15P-0033KPrincipal:
Suite 2, Ground Floor, 317 Hunter StreetNewcastle NSW 2300McCloy Development Management Pty Ltd
Page 1 of 1Form No: 18932, Report No: SSI:NEW20W-1438--S10 © 2000-2018 QESTLab by SpectraQEST.com
Comments
Sample DetailsSample ID: NEW20W-1438--S11 Client Sample ID:Test Request No.: Sampling Method: Sampled by Engineering DepartmentMaterial: Clay Date Sampled: 16/04/2020Source: On Site Date Submitted: 21/04/2020Specification: No SpecificationProject Location: Boundary Road, Medowie, NSWSample Location: TP910A - (0.6 - 0.8m)Borehole Number: TP910ABorehole Depth (m): 0.6 - 0.8
Shrink Test AS 1289.7.1.1Shrink on drying (%): 8.8Shrinkage Moisture Content (%): 41.4Est. inert material (%): <1%Crumbling during shrinkage: NilCracking during shrinkage: Minor
Swell Test AS 1289.7.1.1Swell on Saturation (%): -0.6Moisture Content before (%): 43.1Moisture Content after (%): 44.8Est. Unc. Comp. Strength before (kPa): 150Est. Unc. Comp. Strength after (kPa): 90Shrink Swell
Shrink Swell Index - Iss (%): 4.9
Accredited for compliance with ISO/IEC 17025-Testing.The results of the tests, calibrations and/or measurements included inthis document are traceable to Australian/national standards. Results provided relate only to the items tested or sampled.This report shall not be reproduced except in full.
29/04/2020
Shrink Swell Index ReportReport No: SSI:NEW20W-1438--S11
Issue No: 1
Client:
Date of Issue:NATA Accredited Laboratory Number: 18686Approved Signatory: Dane Cullen(Senior Geotechnician)Project Name: Stage 9 The Bower
F: 02 4960 9775
QUALTEST Laboratory (NSW) Pty Ltd (20708) T: 02 4968 4468E: [email protected]: www.qualtest.com.auABN: 98 153 268 896
8 Ironbark Close Warabrook NSW 2304
Project No.: NEW15P-0033KPrincipal:
Suite 2, Ground Floor, 317 Hunter StreetNewcastle NSW 2300McCloy Development Management Pty Ltd
Page 1 of 1Form No: 18932, Report No: SSI:NEW20W-1438--S11 © 2000-2018 QESTLab by SpectraQEST.com
Comments
Sample DetailsSample ID: NEW20W-1438--S12 Client Sample ID:Test Request No.: Sampling Method: Sampled by Engineering DepartmentMaterial: Sandy Clay Date Sampled: 16/04/2020Source: On Site Date Submitted: 21/04/2020Specification: No SpecificationProject Location: Boundary Road, Medowie, NSWSample Location: TP911 - (0.5 - 0.7m)Borehole Number: TP911Borehole Depth (m): 0.5 - 0.7
Shrink Test AS 1289.7.1.1Shrink on drying (%): 4.8Shrinkage Moisture Content (%): 23.7Est. inert material (%): <1%Crumbling during shrinkage: NilCracking during shrinkage: Minor
Swell Test AS 1289.7.1.1Swell on Saturation (%): 0.7Moisture Content before (%): 26.6Moisture Content after (%): 32.8Est. Unc. Comp. Strength before (kPa): 300Est. Unc. Comp. Strength after (kPa): 130Shrink Swell
Shrink Swell Index - Iss (%): 2.9
Accredited for compliance with ISO/IEC 17025-Testing.The results of the tests, calibrations and/or measurements included inthis document are traceable to Australian/national standards. Results provided relate only to the items tested or sampled.This report shall not be reproduced except in full.
29/04/2020
Shrink Swell Index ReportReport No: SSI:NEW20W-1438--S12
Issue No: 1
Client:
Date of Issue:NATA Accredited Laboratory Number: 18686Approved Signatory: Dane Cullen(Senior Geotechnician)Project Name: Stage 9 The Bower
F: 02 4960 9775
QUALTEST Laboratory (NSW) Pty Ltd (20708) T: 02 4968 4468E: [email protected]: www.qualtest.com.auABN: 98 153 268 896
8 Ironbark Close Warabrook NSW 2304
Project No.: NEW15P-0033KPrincipal:
Suite 2, Ground Floor, 317 Hunter StreetNewcastle NSW 2300McCloy Development Management Pty Ltd
Page 1 of 1Form No: 18932, Report No: SSI:NEW20W-1438--S12 © 2000-2018 QESTLab by SpectraQEST.com
Comments
Sample DetailsSample ID: NEW20W-1525--S01 Client Sample ID: -Test Request No.: - Sampling Method: Sampled by Engineering DepartmentMaterial: Sandy Clay Date Sampled: 17/04/2020Source: On-Site Date Submitted: 17/04/2020Specification: No SpecificationProject Location: Boundary Road, Medowie, NSWSample Location: TP911A - (1.00 to 1.15m)Borehole Number: TP911ABorehole Depth (m): 1.0 - 1.15m
Shrink Test AS 1289.7.1.1Shrink on drying (%): 1.9Shrinkage Moisture Content (%): 21.4Est. inert material (%): 15%Crumbling during shrinkage: NilCracking during shrinkage: Moderate
Swell Test AS 1289.7.1.1Swell on Saturation (%): -0.9Moisture Content before (%): 21.0Moisture Content after (%): 27.2Est. Unc. Comp. Strength before (kPa): 400Est. Unc. Comp. Strength after (kPa): 260Shrink Swell
Shrink Swell Index - Iss (%): 1.1
Accredited for compliance with ISO/IEC 17025-Testing.The results of the tests, calibrations and/or measurements included inthis document are traceable to Australian/national standards. Results provided relate only to the items tested or sampled.This report shall not be reproduced except in full.
1/05/2020
Shrink Swell Index ReportReport No: SSI:NEW20W-1525--S01
Issue No: 1
Client:
Date of Issue:NATA Accredited Laboratory Number: 18686Approved Signatory: Dane Cullen(Senior Geotechnician)Project Name: Stage 9 The Bower
F: 02 4960 9775
QUALTEST Laboratory (NSW) Pty Ltd (20708) T: 02 4968 4468E: [email protected]: www.qualtest.com.auABN: 98 153 268 896
8 Ironbark Close Warabrook NSW 2304
Project No.: NEW15P-0033KPrincipal:
Suite 2, Ground Floor, 317 Hunter StreetNewcastle NSW 2300McCloy Development Management Pty Ltd
Page 1 of 1Form No: 18932, Report No: SSI:NEW20W-1525--S01 © 2000-2018 QESTLab by SpectraQEST.com
Comments
Sample DetailsSample ID: NEW20W-1525--S02 Client Sample ID: -Test Request No.: - Sampling Method: Sampled by Engineering DepartmentMaterial: Clay Date Sampled: 17/04/2020Source: On-Site Date Submitted: 17/04/2020Specification: No SpecificationProject Location: Boundary Road, Medowie, NSWSample Location: TP911A - (1.30 to 1.45m)Borehole Number: TP911ABorehole Depth (m): 1.3 - 1.45
Shrink Test AS 1289.7.1.1Shrink on drying (%): 8.1Shrinkage Moisture Content (%): 30.5Est. inert material (%): < 1%Crumbling during shrinkage: NilCracking during shrinkage: Minor
Swell Test AS 1289.7.1.1Swell on Saturation (%): -1.0Moisture Content before (%): 30.1Moisture Content after (%): 30.8Est. Unc. Comp. Strength before (kPa): 260Est. Unc. Comp. Strength after (kPa): 90Shrink Swell
Shrink Swell Index - Iss (%): 4.5
Accredited for compliance with ISO/IEC 17025-Testing.The results of the tests, calibrations and/or measurements included inthis document are traceable to Australian/national standards. Results provided relate only to the items tested or sampled.This report shall not be reproduced except in full.
1/05/2020
Shrink Swell Index ReportReport No: SSI:NEW20W-1525--S02
Issue No: 1
Client:
Date of Issue:NATA Accredited Laboratory Number: 18686Approved Signatory: Dane Cullen(Senior Geotechnician)Project Name: Stage 9 The Bower
F: 02 4960 9775
QUALTEST Laboratory (NSW) Pty Ltd (20708) T: 02 4968 4468E: [email protected]: www.qualtest.com.auABN: 98 153 268 896
8 Ironbark Close Warabrook NSW 2304
Project No.: NEW15P-0033KPrincipal:
Suite 2, Ground Floor, 317 Hunter StreetNewcastle NSW 2300McCloy Development Management Pty Ltd
Page 1 of 1Form No: 18932, Report No: SSI:NEW20W-1525--S02 © 2000-2018 QESTLab by SpectraQEST.com
Comments
Sample DetailsSample ID: NEW20W-1525--S03 Client Sample ID: -Test Request No.: - Sampling Method: Sampled by Engineering DepartmentMaterial: Sandy Clay Date Sampled: 17/04/2020Source: On-Site Date Submitted: 17/04/2020Specification: No SpecificationProject Location: Boundary Road, Medowie, NSWSample Location: TP912A - (0.50 to 0.65m)Borehole Number: TP912ABorehole Depth (m): 0.5 - 0.65
Shrink Test AS 1289.7.1.1Shrink on drying (%): 2.7Shrinkage Moisture Content (%): 22.2Est. inert material (%): 10%Crumbling during shrinkage: NilCracking during shrinkage: Moderate
Swell Test AS 1289.7.1.1Swell on Saturation (%): -1.0Moisture Content before (%): 23.9Moisture Content after (%): 34.4Est. Unc. Comp. Strength before (kPa): 200Est. Unc. Comp. Strength after (kPa): 130Shrink Swell
Shrink Swell Index - Iss (%): 1.5
Accredited for compliance with ISO/IEC 17025-Testing.The results of the tests, calibrations and/or measurements included inthis document are traceable to Australian/national standards. Results provided relate only to the items tested or sampled.This report shall not be reproduced except in full.
4/05/2020
Shrink Swell Index ReportReport No: SSI:NEW20W-1525--S03
Issue No: 1
Client:
Date of Issue:NATA Accredited Laboratory Number: 18686Approved Signatory: Dane Cullen(Senior Geotechnician)Project Name: Stage 9 The Bower
F: 02 4960 9775
QUALTEST Laboratory (NSW) Pty Ltd (20708) T: 02 4968 4468E: [email protected]: www.qualtest.com.auABN: 98 153 268 896
8 Ironbark Close Warabrook NSW 2304
Project No.: NEW15P-0033KPrincipal:
Suite 2, Ground Floor, 317 Hunter StreetNewcastle NSW 2300McCloy Development Management Pty Ltd
Page 1 of 1Form No: 18932, Report No: SSI:NEW20W-1525--S03 © 2000-2018 QESTLab by SpectraQEST.com
Comments
Sample DetailsSample ID: NEW20W-1525--S04 Client Sample ID: -Test Request No.: - Sampling Method: Sampled by Engineering DepartmentMaterial: Sandy Clay Date Sampled: 17/04/2020Source: On-Site Date Submitted: 17/04/2020Specification: No SpecificationProject Location: Boundary Road, Medowie, NSWSample Location: TP912A - (1.10 to 1.30m)Borehole Number: TP912ABorehole Depth (m): 1.1 - 1.3
Shrink Test AS 1289.7.1.1Shrink on drying (%): 2.5Shrinkage Moisture Content (%): 20.4Est. inert material (%): 10%Crumbling during shrinkage: NilCracking during shrinkage: Minor
Swell Test AS 1289.7.1.1Swell on Saturation (%): -0.8Moisture Content before (%): 20.7Moisture Content after (%): 25.5Est. Unc. Comp. Strength before (kPa): 450Est. Unc. Comp. Strength after (kPa): 260Shrink Swell
Shrink Swell Index - Iss (%): 1.4
Accredited for compliance with ISO/IEC 17025-Testing.The results of the tests, calibrations and/or measurements included inthis document are traceable to Australian/national standards. Results provided relate only to the items tested or sampled.This report shall not be reproduced except in full.
1/05/2020
Shrink Swell Index ReportReport No: SSI:NEW20W-1525--S04
Issue No: 1
Client:
Date of Issue:NATA Accredited Laboratory Number: 18686Approved Signatory: Dane Cullen(Senior Geotechnician)Project Name: Stage 9 The Bower
F: 02 4960 9775
QUALTEST Laboratory (NSW) Pty Ltd (20708) T: 02 4968 4468E: [email protected]: www.qualtest.com.auABN: 98 153 268 896
8 Ironbark Close Warabrook NSW 2304
Project No.: NEW15P-0033KPrincipal:
Suite 2, Ground Floor, 317 Hunter StreetNewcastle NSW 2300McCloy Development Management Pty Ltd
Page 1 of 1Form No: 18932, Report No: SSI:NEW20W-1525--S04 © 2000-2018 QESTLab by SpectraQEST.com
Comments
Sample DetailsSample ID: NEW20W-1525--S05 Client Sample ID: -Test Request No.: - Sampling Method: Sampled by Engineering DepartmentMaterial: Sandy Clay Date Sampled: 17/04/2020Source: On-Site Date Submitted: 17/04/2020Specification: No SpecificationProject Location: Boundary Road, Medowie, NSWSample Location: TP913A - (0.60 to 0.90m)Borehole Number: TP913ABorehole Depth (m): 0.6 - 0.9m
Shrink Test AS 1289.7.1.1Shrink on drying (%): 2.9Shrinkage Moisture Content (%): 25.0Est. inert material (%): 5%Crumbling during shrinkage: NilCracking during shrinkage: Moderate
Swell Test AS 1289.7.1.1Swell on Saturation (%): -1.2Moisture Content before (%): 24.4Moisture Content after (%): 26.1Est. Unc. Comp. Strength before (kPa): 500Est. Unc. Comp. Strength after (kPa): 190Shrink Swell
Shrink Swell Index - Iss (%): 1.6
Accredited for compliance with ISO/IEC 17025-Testing.The results of the tests, calibrations and/or measurements included inthis document are traceable to Australian/national standards. Results provided relate only to the items tested or sampled.This report shall not be reproduced except in full.
1/05/2020
Shrink Swell Index ReportReport No: SSI:NEW20W-1525--S05
Issue No: 1
Client:
Date of Issue:NATA Accredited Laboratory Number: 18686Approved Signatory: Dane Cullen(Senior Geotechnician)Project Name: Stage 9 The Bower
F: 02 4960 9775
QUALTEST Laboratory (NSW) Pty Ltd (20708) T: 02 4968 4468E: [email protected]: www.qualtest.com.auABN: 98 153 268 896
8 Ironbark Close Warabrook NSW 2304
Project No.: NEW15P-0033KPrincipal:
Suite 2, Ground Floor, 317 Hunter StreetNewcastle NSW 2300McCloy Development Management Pty Ltd
Page 1 of 1Form No: 18932, Report No: SSI:NEW20W-1525--S05 © 2000-2018 QESTLab by SpectraQEST.com
Comments
Sample DetailsSample ID: NEW20W-1525--S06 Client Sample ID: -Test Request No.: - Sampling Method: Sampled by Engineering DepartmentMaterial: Sandy Clay Date Sampled: 17/04/2020Source: On-Site Date Submitted: 17/04/2020Specification: No SpecificationProject Location: Boundary Road, Medowie, NSWSample Location: TP913A - (1.40 to 1.60m)Borehole Number: TP913ABorehole Depth (m): 1.4 - 1.6
Shrink Test AS 1289.7.1.1Shrink on drying (%): 2.6Shrinkage Moisture Content (%): 25.3Est. inert material (%): 5%Crumbling during shrinkage: NilCracking during shrinkage: Moderate
Swell Test AS 1289.7.1.1Swell on Saturation (%): -1.0Moisture Content before (%): 24.9Moisture Content after (%): 26.4Est. Unc. Comp. Strength before (kPa): 250Est. Unc. Comp. Strength after (kPa): 220Shrink Swell
Shrink Swell Index - Iss (%): 1.5
Accredited for compliance with ISO/IEC 17025-Testing.The results of the tests, calibrations and/or measurements included inthis document are traceable to Australian/national standards. Results provided relate only to the items tested or sampled.This report shall not be reproduced except in full.
1/05/2020
Shrink Swell Index ReportReport No: SSI:NEW20W-1525--S06
Issue No: 1
Client:
Date of Issue:NATA Accredited Laboratory Number: 18686Approved Signatory: Dane Cullen(Senior Geotechnician)Project Name: Stage 9 The Bower
F: 02 4960 9775
QUALTEST Laboratory (NSW) Pty Ltd (20708) T: 02 4968 4468E: [email protected]: www.qualtest.com.auABN: 98 153 268 896
8 Ironbark Close Warabrook NSW 2304
Project No.: NEW15P-0033KPrincipal:
Suite 2, Ground Floor, 317 Hunter StreetNewcastle NSW 2300McCloy Development Management Pty Ltd
Page 1 of 1Form No: 18932, Report No: SSI:NEW20W-1525--S06 © 2000-2018 QESTLab by SpectraQEST.com
Comments
Sample DetailsSample ID: NEW20W-1525--S07 Client Sample ID: -Test Request No.: - Sampling Method: Sampled by Engineering DepartmentMaterial: Sandy Clay Date Sampled: 17/04/2020Source: On-Site Date Submitted: 17/04/2020Specification: No SpecificationProject Location: Boundary Road, Medowie, NSWSample Location: TP914A - (0.70 to 0.85m)Borehole Number: TP914ABorehole Depth (m): 0.7 - 0.85
Shrink Test AS 1289.7.1.1Shrink on drying (%): 3.3Shrinkage Moisture Content (%): 24.0Est. inert material (%): 5%Crumbling during shrinkage: NilCracking during shrinkage: Major
Swell Test AS 1289.7.1.1Swell on Saturation (%): -0.9Moisture Content before (%): 23.4Moisture Content after (%): 25.1Est. Unc. Comp. Strength before (kPa): 300Est. Unc. Comp. Strength after (kPa): 300Shrink Swell
Shrink Swell Index - Iss (%): 1.9
Accredited for compliance with ISO/IEC 17025-Testing.The results of the tests, calibrations and/or measurements included inthis document are traceable to Australian/national standards. Results provided relate only to the items tested or sampled.This report shall not be reproduced except in full.
1/05/2020
Shrink Swell Index ReportReport No: SSI:NEW20W-1525--S07
Issue No: 1
Client:
Date of Issue:NATA Accredited Laboratory Number: 18686Approved Signatory: Dane Cullen(Senior Geotechnician)Project Name: Stage 9 The Bower
F: 02 4960 9775
QUALTEST Laboratory (NSW) Pty Ltd (20708) T: 02 4968 4468E: [email protected]: www.qualtest.com.auABN: 98 153 268 896
8 Ironbark Close Warabrook NSW 2304
Project No.: NEW15P-0033KPrincipal:
Suite 2, Ground Floor, 317 Hunter StreetNewcastle NSW 2300McCloy Development Management Pty Ltd
Page 1 of 1Form No: 18932, Report No: SSI:NEW20W-1525--S07 © 2000-2018 QESTLab by SpectraQEST.com
Comments
Sample DetailsSample ID: NEW20W-1525--S08 Client Sample ID: -Test Request No.: - Sampling Method: Sampled by Engineering DepartmentMaterial: Sandy Clay Date Sampled: 17/04/2020Source: On-Site Date Submitted: 17/04/2020Specification: No SpecificationProject Location: Boundary Road, Medowie, NSWSample Location: TP915A - (0.50 to 0.65m)Borehole Number: TP915ABorehole Depth (m): 0.5 - 0.65
Shrink Test AS 1289.7.1.1Shrink on drying (%): 1.7Shrinkage Moisture Content (%): 23.0Est. inert material (%): 5%Crumbling during shrinkage: MinorCracking during shrinkage: Nil
Swell Test AS 1289.7.1.1Swell on Saturation (%): -0.8Moisture Content before (%): 23.0Moisture Content after (%): 28.4Est. Unc. Comp. Strength before (kPa): 290Est. Unc. Comp. Strength after (kPa): 250Shrink Swell
Shrink Swell Index - Iss (%): 1.0
Accredited for compliance with ISO/IEC 17025-Testing.The results of the tests, calibrations and/or measurements included inthis document are traceable to Australian/national standards. Results provided relate only to the items tested or sampled.This report shall not be reproduced except in full.
1/05/2020
Shrink Swell Index ReportReport No: SSI:NEW20W-1525--S08
Issue No: 1
Client:
Date of Issue:NATA Accredited Laboratory Number: 18686Approved Signatory: Dane Cullen(Senior Geotechnician)Project Name: Stage 9 The Bower
F: 02 4960 9775
QUALTEST Laboratory (NSW) Pty Ltd (20708) T: 02 4968 4468E: [email protected]: www.qualtest.com.auABN: 98 153 268 896
8 Ironbark Close Warabrook NSW 2304
Project No.: NEW15P-0033KPrincipal:
Suite 2, Ground Floor, 317 Hunter StreetNewcastle NSW 2300McCloy Development Management Pty Ltd
Page 1 of 1Form No: 18932, Report No: SSI:NEW20W-1525--S08 © 2000-2018 QESTLab by SpectraQEST.com
Comments
Sample DetailsSample ID: NEW20W-1525--S09 Client Sample ID: -Test Request No.: - Sampling Method: Sampled by Engineering DepartmentMaterial: Sandy Clay Date Sampled: 17/04/2020Source: On-Site Date Submitted: 17/04/2020Specification: No SpecificationProject Location: Boundary Road, Medowie, NSWSample Location: TP915A - (1.10 to 1.25m)Borehole Number: TP915ABorehole Depth (m): 1.1 - 1.25
Shrink Test AS 1289.7.1.1Shrink on drying (%): 2.7Shrinkage Moisture Content (%): 20.2Est. inert material (%): 5%Crumbling during shrinkage: NilCracking during shrinkage: Minor
Swell Test AS 1289.7.1.1Swell on Saturation (%): -1.2Moisture Content before (%): 23.5Moisture Content after (%): 29.6Est. Unc. Comp. Strength before (kPa): 300Est. Unc. Comp. Strength after (kPa): 140Shrink Swell
Shrink Swell Index - Iss (%): 1.5
Accredited for compliance with ISO/IEC 17025-Testing.The results of the tests, calibrations and/or measurements included inthis document are traceable to Australian/national standards. Results provided relate only to the items tested or sampled.This report shall not be reproduced except in full.
1/05/2020
Shrink Swell Index ReportReport No: SSI:NEW20W-1525--S09
Issue No: 1
Client:
Date of Issue:NATA Accredited Laboratory Number: 18686Approved Signatory: Dane Cullen(Senior Geotechnician)Project Name: Stage 9 The Bower
F: 02 4960 9775
QUALTEST Laboratory (NSW) Pty Ltd (20708) T: 02 4968 4468E: [email protected]: www.qualtest.com.auABN: 98 153 268 896
8 Ironbark Close Warabrook NSW 2304
Project No.: NEW15P-0033KPrincipal:
Suite 2, Ground Floor, 317 Hunter StreetNewcastle NSW 2300McCloy Development Management Pty Ltd
Page 1 of 1Form No: 18932, Report No: SSI:NEW20W-1525--S09 © 2000-2018 QESTLab by SpectraQEST.com
Comments
Sample DetailsSample ID: NEW20W-1525--S10 Client Sample ID: -Test Request No.: - Sampling Method: Sampled by Engineering DepartmentMaterial: Sandy Clay Date Sampled: 17/04/2020Source: On-Site Date Submitted: 17/04/2020Specification: No SpecificationProject Location: Boundary Road, Medowie, NSWSample Location: TP916A - (0.50 to 0.65m)Borehole Number: TP916ABorehole Depth (m): 0.5 - 0.65
Shrink Test AS 1289.7.1.1Shrink on drying (%): 1.6Shrinkage Moisture Content (%): 20.6Est. inert material (%): 5%Crumbling during shrinkage: NilCracking during shrinkage: Moderate
Swell Test AS 1289.7.1.1Swell on Saturation (%): -1.7Moisture Content before (%): 22.0Moisture Content after (%): 30.3Est. Unc. Comp. Strength before (kPa): 500Est. Unc. Comp. Strength after (kPa): 230Shrink Swell
Shrink Swell Index - Iss (%): 0.9
Accredited for compliance with ISO/IEC 17025-Testing.The results of the tests, calibrations and/or measurements included inthis document are traceable to Australian/national standards. Results provided relate only to the items tested or sampled.This report shall not be reproduced except in full.
1/05/2020
Shrink Swell Index ReportReport No: SSI:NEW20W-1525--S10
Issue No: 1
Client:
Date of Issue:NATA Accredited Laboratory Number: 18686Approved Signatory: Dane Cullen(Senior Geotechnician)Project Name: Stage 9 The Bower
F: 02 4960 9775
QUALTEST Laboratory (NSW) Pty Ltd (20708) T: 02 4968 4468E: [email protected]: www.qualtest.com.auABN: 98 153 268 896
8 Ironbark Close Warabrook NSW 2304
Project No.: NEW15P-0033KPrincipal:
Suite 2, Ground Floor, 317 Hunter StreetNewcastle NSW 2300McCloy Development Management Pty Ltd
Page 1 of 1Form No: 18932, Report No: SSI:NEW20W-1525--S10 © 2000-2018 QESTLab by SpectraQEST.com
Comments
Sample DetailsSample ID: NEW20W-1525--S11 Client Sample ID: -Test Request No.: - Sampling Method: Sampled by Engineering DepartmentMaterial: Clay Date Sampled: 17/04/2020Source: On-Site Date Submitted: 17/04/2020Specification: No SpecificationProject Location: Boundary Road, Medowie, NSWSample Location: TP916A - (1.20 to 1.35m)Borehole Number: TP916ABorehole Depth (m): 1.2 - 1.35
Shrink Test AS 1289.7.1.1Shrink on drying (%): 5.0Shrinkage Moisture Content (%): 26.0Est. inert material (%): <1Crumbling during shrinkage: NilCracking during shrinkage: Minor
Swell Test AS 1289.7.1.1Swell on Saturation (%): -0.4Moisture Content before (%): 23.6Moisture Content after (%): 24.9Est. Unc. Comp. Strength before (kPa): 290Est. Unc. Comp. Strength after (kPa): 270Shrink Swell
Shrink Swell Index - Iss (%): 2.8
Accredited for compliance with ISO/IEC 17025-Testing.The results of the tests, calibrations and/or measurements included inthis document are traceable to Australian/national standards. Results provided relate only to the items tested or sampled.This report shall not be reproduced except in full.
1/05/2020
Shrink Swell Index ReportReport No: SSI:NEW20W-1525--S11
Issue No: 1
Client:
Date of Issue:NATA Accredited Laboratory Number: 18686Approved Signatory: Dane Cullen(Senior Geotechnician)Project Name: Stage 9 The Bower
F: 02 4960 9775
QUALTEST Laboratory (NSW) Pty Ltd (20708) T: 02 4968 4468E: [email protected]: www.qualtest.com.auABN: 98 153 268 896
8 Ironbark Close Warabrook NSW 2304
Project No.: NEW15P-0033KPrincipal:
Suite 2, Ground Floor, 317 Hunter StreetNewcastle NSW 2300McCloy Development Management Pty Ltd
Page 1 of 1Form No: 18932, Report No: SSI:NEW20W-1525--S11 © 2000-2018 QESTLab by SpectraQEST.com
Comments
Sample DetailsSample ID: NEW20W-1525--S12 Client Sample ID: -Test Request No.: - Sampling Method: Sampled by Engineering DepartmentMaterial: Sandy Clay Date Sampled: 17/04/2020Source: On-Site Date Submitted: 17/04/2020Specification: No SpecificationProject Location: Boundary Road, Medowie, NSWSample Location: TP917A - (0.60 to 0.75m)Borehole Number: TP917ABorehole Depth (m): 0.6 - 0.75
Shrink Test AS 1289.7.1.1Shrink on drying (%): 2.8Shrinkage Moisture Content (%): 22.2Est. inert material (%): 5%Crumbling during shrinkage: NilCracking during shrinkage: Minor
Swell Test AS 1289.7.1.1Swell on Saturation (%): -0.5Moisture Content before (%): 23.5Moisture Content after (%): 27.4Est. Unc. Comp. Strength before (kPa): 320Est. Unc. Comp. Strength after (kPa): 310Shrink Swell
Shrink Swell Index - Iss (%): 1.6
Accredited for compliance with ISO/IEC 17025-Testing.The results of the tests, calibrations and/or measurements included inthis document are traceable to Australian/national standards. Results provided relate only to the items tested or sampled.This report shall not be reproduced except in full.
1/05/2020
Shrink Swell Index ReportReport No: SSI:NEW20W-1525--S12
Issue No: 1
Client:
Date of Issue:NATA Accredited Laboratory Number: 18686Approved Signatory: Dane Cullen(Senior Geotechnician)Project Name: Stage 9 The Bower
F: 02 4960 9775
QUALTEST Laboratory (NSW) Pty Ltd (20708) T: 02 4968 4468E: [email protected]: www.qualtest.com.auABN: 98 153 268 896
8 Ironbark Close Warabrook NSW 2304
Project No.: NEW15P-0033KPrincipal:
Suite 2, Ground Floor, 317 Hunter StreetNewcastle NSW 2300McCloy Development Management Pty Ltd
Page 1 of 1Form No: 18932, Report No: SSI:NEW20W-1525--S12 © 2000-2018 QESTLab by SpectraQEST.com
Comments
Sample DetailsSample ID: NEW20W-1525--S13 Client Sample ID: -Test Request No.: - Sampling Method: Sampled by Engineering DepartmentMaterial: Clay Date Sampled: 17/04/2020Source: On-Site Date Submitted: 17/04/2020Specification: No SpecificationProject Location: Boundary Road, Medowie, NSWSample Location: TP917A - (1.10 to 1.30m)Borehole Number: TP917ABorehole Depth (m): 1.1 - 1.3
Shrink Test AS 1289.7.1.1Shrink on drying (%): 3.7Shrinkage Moisture Content (%): 29.6Est. inert material (%): 2%Crumbling during shrinkage: NilCracking during shrinkage: Major
Swell Test AS 1289.7.1.1Swell on Saturation (%): -0.6Moisture Content before (%): 29.2Moisture Content after (%): 30.3Est. Unc. Comp. Strength before (kPa): 310Est. Unc. Comp. Strength after (kPa): 300Shrink Swell
Shrink Swell Index - Iss (%): 2.1
Accredited for compliance with ISO/IEC 17025-Testing.The results of the tests, calibrations and/or measurements included inthis document are traceable to Australian/national standards. Results provided relate only to the items tested or sampled.This report shall not be reproduced except in full.
4/05/2020
Shrink Swell Index ReportReport No: SSI:NEW20W-1525--S13
Issue No: 1
Client:
Date of Issue:NATA Accredited Laboratory Number: 18686Approved Signatory: Dane Cullen(Senior Geotechnician)Project Name: Stage 9 The Bower
F: 02 4960 9775
QUALTEST Laboratory (NSW) Pty Ltd (20708) T: 02 4968 4468E: [email protected]: www.qualtest.com.auABN: 98 153 268 896
8 Ironbark Close Warabrook NSW 2304
Project No.: NEW15P-0033KPrincipal:
Suite 2, Ground Floor, 317 Hunter StreetNewcastle NSW 2300McCloy Development Management Pty Ltd
Page 1 of 1Form No: 18932, Report No: SSI:NEW20W-1525--S13 © 2000-2018 QESTLab by SpectraQEST.com
Comments
APPENDIX C:
CSIRO Sheet BTF 18
Foundation Maintenance and Footing
Performance: A Homeowner’s Guide
Soil Types
The types of soils usually present under the topsoil in land zoned forresidential buildings can be split into two approximate groups –granular and clay. Quite often, foundation soil is a mixture of bothtypes. The general problems associated with soils having granularcontent are usually caused by erosion. Clay soils are subject tosaturation and swell/shrink problems.
Classifications for a given area can generally be obtained byapplication to the local authority, but these are sometimes unreliableand if there is doubt, a geotechnical report should be commissioned.As most buildings suffering movement problems are founded on claysoils, there is an emphasis on classification of soils according to theamount of swell and shrinkage they experience with variations ofwater content. The table below is Table 2.1 from AS 2870, theResidential Slab and Footing Code.
Causes of Movement
Settlement due to constructionThere are two types of settlement that occur as a result ofconstruction:• Immediate settlement occurs when a building is first placed on its
foundation soil, as a result of compaction of the soil under theweight of the structure. The cohesive quality of clay soil mitigatesagainst this, but granular (particularly sandy) soil is susceptible.
• Consolidation settlement is a feature of clay soil and may takeplace because of the expulsion of moisture from the soil or becauseof the soil’s lack of resistance to local compressive or shear stresses.This will usually take place during the first few months afterconstruction, but has been known to take many years inexceptional cases.
These problems are the province of the builder and should be takeninto consideration as part of the preparation of the site for construc-tion. Building Technology File 19 (BTF 19) deals with theseproblems.
ErosionAll soils are prone to erosion, but sandy soil is particularly susceptibleto being washed away. Even clay with a sand component of say 10%or more can suffer from erosion.
SaturationThis is particularly a problem in clay soils. Saturation creates a bog-like suspension of the soil that causes it to lose virtually all of itsbearing capacity. To a lesser degree, sand is affected by saturationbecause saturated sand may undergo a reduction in volume –particularly imported sand fill for bedding and blinding layers.However, this usually occurs as immediate settlement and shouldnormally be the province of the builder.
Seasonal swelling and shrinkage of soilAll clays react to the presence of water by slowly absorbing it, makingthe soil increase in volume (see table below). The degree of increasevaries considerably between different clays, as does the degree ofdecrease during the subsequent drying out caused by fair weatherperiods. Because of the low absorption and expulsion rate, thisphenomenon will not usually be noticeable unless there areprolonged rainy or dry periods, usually of weeks or months,depending on the land and soil characteristics.
The swelling of soil creates an upward force on the footings of thebuilding, and shrinkage creates subsidence that takes away thesupport needed by the footing to retain equilibrium.
Shear failureThis phenomenon occurs when the foundation soil does not havesufficient strength to support the weight of the footing. There aretwo major post-construction causes:• Significant load increase.• Reduction of lateral support of the soil under the footing due to
erosion or excavation.• In clay soil, shear failure can be caused by saturation of the soil
adjacent to or under the footing.
Buildings can and often do move. This movement can be up, down, lateral or rotational. The fundamental causeof movement in buildings can usually be related to one or more problems in the foundation soil. It is important forthe homeowner to identify the soil type in order to ascertain the measures that should be put in place in order toensure that problems in the foundation soil can be prevented, thus protecting against building movement.
This Building Technology File is designed to identify causes of soil-related building movement, and to suggestmethods of prevention of resultant cracking in buildings.
Foundation Maintenanceand Footing Performance:A Homeowner’s Guide
GENERAL DEFINITIONS OF SITE CLASSES
Class Foundation
A Most sand and rock sites with little or no ground movement from moisture changes
S Slightly reactive clay sites with only slight ground movement from moisture changes
M Moderately reactive clay or silt sites, which can experience moderate ground movement from moisture changes
H Highly reactive clay sites, which can experience high ground movement from moisture changes
E Extremely reactive sites, which can experience extreme ground movement from moisture changes
A to P Filled sites
P Sites which include soft soils, such as soft clay or silt or loose sands; landslip; mine subsidence; collapsing soils; soils subject to erosion; reactive sites subject to abnormal moisture conditions or sites which cannot be classified otherwise
BTF 18replaces
InformationSheet 10/91
Tree root growthTrees and shrubs that are allowed to grow in the vicinity of footingscan cause foundation soil movement in two ways:
• Roots that grow under footings may increase in cross-sectionalsize, exerting upward pressure on footings.
• Roots in the vicinity of footings will absorb much of the moisturein the foundation soil, causing shrinkage or subsidence.
Unevenness of Movement
The types of ground movement described above usually occurunevenly throughout the building’s foundation soil. Settlement dueto construction tends to be uneven because of:
• Differing compaction of foundation soil prior to construction.• Differing moisture content of foundation soil prior to construction.
Movement due to non-construction causes is usually more unevenstill. Erosion can undermine a footing that traverses the flow or cancreate the conditions for shear failure by eroding soil adjacent to afooting that runs in the same direction as the flow.
Saturation of clay foundation soil may occur where subfloor wallscreate a dam that makes water pond. It can also occur wherever thereis a source of water near footings in clay soil. This leads to a severereduction in the strength of the soil which may create local shearfailure.
Seasonal swelling and shrinkage of clay soil affects the perimeter ofthe building first, then gradually spreads to the interior. The swellingprocess will usually begin at the uphill extreme of the building, or onthe weather side where the land is flat. Swelling gradually reaches theinterior soil as absorption continues. Shrinkage usually begins wherethe sun’s heat is greatest.
Effects of Uneven Soil Movement on Structures
Erosion and saturationErosion removes the support from under footings, tending to createsubsidence of the part of the structure under which it occurs.Brickwork walls will resist the stress created by this removal ofsupport by bridging the gap or cantilevering until the bricks or themortar bedding fail. Older masonry has little resistance. Evidence offailure varies according to circumstances and symptoms may include:
• Step cracking in the mortar beds in the body of the wall orabove/below openings such as doors or windows.
• Vertical cracking in the bricks (usually but not necessarily in linewith the vertical beds or perpends).
Isolated piers affected by erosion or saturation of foundations willeventually lose contact with the bearers they support and may tilt orfall over. The floors that have lost this support will become bouncy,sometimes rattling ornaments etc.
Seasonal swelling/shrinkage in claySwelling foundation soil due to rainy periods first lifts the mostexposed extremities of the footing system, then the remainder of theperimeter footings while gradually permeating inside the buildingfootprint to lift internal footings. This swelling first tends to create adish effect, because the external footings are pushed higher than theinternal ones.
The first noticeable symptom may be that the floor appears slightlydished. This is often accompanied by some doors binding on thefloor or the door head, together with some cracking of cornicemitres. In buildings with timber flooring supported by bearers andjoists, the floor can be bouncy. Externally there may be visibledishing of the hip or ridge lines.
As the moisture absorption process completes its journey to theinnermost areas of the building, the internal footings will rise. If thespread of moisture is roughly even, it may be that the symptoms willtemporarily disappear, but it is more likely that swelling will beuneven, creating a difference rather than a disappearance insymptoms. In buildings with timber flooring supported by bearersand joists, the isolated piers will rise more easily than the stripfootings or piers under walls, creating noticeable doming of flooring.
As the weather pattern changes and the soil begins to dry out, theexternal footings will be first affected, beginning with the locationswhere the sun’s effect is strongest. This has the effect of lowering theexternal footings. The doming is accentuated and cracking reducesor disappears where it occurred because of dishing, but other cracksopen up. The roof lines may become convex.
Doming and dishing are also affected by weather in other ways. Inareas where warm, wet summers and cooler dry winters prevail,water migration tends to be toward the interior and doming will beaccentuated, whereas where summers are dry and winters are coldand wet, migration tends to be toward the exterior and theunderlying propensity is toward dishing.
Movement caused by tree rootsIn general, growing roots will exert an upward pressure on footings,whereas soil subject to drying because of tree or shrub roots will tendto remove support from under footings by inducing shrinkage.
Complications caused by the structure itselfMost forces that the soil causes to be exerted on structures arevertical – i.e. either up or down. However, because these forces areseldom spread evenly around the footings, and because the buildingresists uneven movement because of its rigidity, forces are exertedfrom one part of the building to another. The net result of all theseforces is usually rotational. This resultant force often complicates thediagnosis because the visible symptoms do not simply reflect theoriginal cause. A common symptom is binding of doors on thevertical member of the frame.
Effects on full masonry structuresBrickwork will resist cracking where it can. It will attempt to spanareas that lose support because of subsided foundations or raisedpoints. It is therefore usual to see cracking at weak points, such asopenings for windows or doors.
In the event of construction settlement, cracking will usually remainunchanged after the process of settlement has ceased.
With local shear or erosion, cracking will usually continue to developuntil the original cause has been remedied, or until the subsidencehas completely neutralised the affected portion of footing and thestructure has stabilised on other footings that remain effective.
In the case of swell/shrink effects, the brickwork will in some casesreturn to its original position after completion of a cycle, however itis more likely that the rotational effect will not be exactly reversed,and it is also usual that brickwork will settle in its new position andwill resist the forces trying to return it to its original position. Thismeans that in a case where swelling takes place after constructionand cracking occurs, the cracking is likely to at least partly remainafter the shrink segment of the cycle is complete. Thus, each timethe cycle is repeated, the likelihood is that the cracking will becomewider until the sections of brickwork become virtually independent.
With repeated cycles, once the cracking is established, if there is noother complication, it is normal for the incidence of cracking tostabilise, as the building has the articulation it needs to cope withthe problem. This is by no means always the case, however, andmonitoring of cracks in walls and floors should always be treatedseriously.
Upheaval caused by growth of tree roots under footings is not asimple vertical shear stress. There is a tendency for the root to alsoexert lateral forces that attempt to separate sections of brickworkafter initial cracking has occurred.
Trees can cause shrinkage and damage
The normal structural arrangement is that the inner leaf of brick-work in the external walls and at least some of the internal walls(depending on the roof type) comprise the load-bearing structure onwhich any upper floors, ceilings and the roof are supported. In thesecases, it is internally visible cracking that should be the main focusof attention, however there are a few examples of dwellings whoseexternal leaf of masonry plays some supporting role, so this shouldbe checked if there is any doubt. In any case, externally visiblecracking is important as a guide to stresses on the structure generally,and it should also be remembered that the external walls must becapable of supporting themselves.
Effects on framed structuresTimber or steel framed buildings are less likely to exhibit crackingdue to swell/shrink than masonry buildings because of theirflexibility. Also, the doming/dishing effects tend to be lower becauseof the lighter weight of walls. The main risks to framed buildings areencountered because of the isolated pier footings used under walls.Where erosion or saturation cause a footing to fall away, this candouble the span which a wall must bridge. This additional stress cancreate cracking in wall linings, particularly where there is a weakpoint in the structure caused by a door or window opening. It is,however, unlikely that framed structures will be so stressed as to sufferserious damage without first exhibiting some or all of the abovesymptoms for a considerable period. The same warning period shouldapply in the case of upheaval. It should be noted, however, that whereframed buildings are supported by strip footings there is only one leafof brickwork and therefore the externally visible walls are thesupporting structure for the building. In this case, the subfloormasonry walls can be expected to behave as full brickwork walls.
Effects on brick veneer structuresBecause the load-bearing structure of a brick veneer building is theframe that makes up the interior leaf of the external walls plusperhaps the internal walls, depending on the type of roof, thebuilding can be expected to behave as a framed structure, except thatthe external masonry will behave in a similar way to the external leafof a full masonry structure.
Water Service and Drainage
Where a water service pipe, a sewer or stormwater drainage pipe is inthe vicinity of a building, a water leak can cause erosion, swelling orsaturation of susceptible soil. Even a minuscule leak can be enoughto saturate a clay foundation. A leaking tap near a building can havethe same effect. In addition, trenches containing pipes can becomewatercourses even though backfilled, particularly where brokenrubble is used as fill. Water that runs along these trenches can beresponsible for serious erosion, interstrata seepage into subfloor areasand saturation.
Pipe leakage and trench water flows also encourage tree and shrubroots to the source of water, complicating and exacerbating theproblem.Poor roof plumbing can result in large volumes of rainwater beingconcentrated in a small area of soil:
• Incorrect falls in roof guttering may result in overflows, as maygutters blocked with leaves etc.
• Corroded guttering or downpipes can spill water to ground.• Downpipes not positively connected to a proper stormwater
collection system will direct a concentration of water to soil that isdirectly adjacent to footings, sometimes causing large-scaleproblems such as erosion, saturation and migration of water underthe building.
Seriousness of Cracking
In general, most cracking found in masonry walls is a cosmeticnuisance only and can be kept in repair or even ignored. The tablebelow is a reproduction of Table C1 of AS 2870.
AS 2870 also publishes figures relating to cracking in concrete floors,however because wall cracking will usually reach the critical pointsignificantly earlier than cracking in slabs, this table is notreproduced here.
Prevention/Cure
PlumbingWhere building movement is caused by water service, roof plumbing,sewer or stormwater failure, the remedy is to repair the problem. It is prudent, however, to consider also rerouting pipes away fromthe building where possible, and relocating taps to positions whereany leakage will not direct water to the building vicinity. Even wheregully traps are present, there is sometimes sufficient spill to createerosion or saturation, particularly in modern installations usingsmaller diameter PVC fixtures. Indeed, some gully traps are notsituated directly under the taps that are installed to charge them,with the result that water from the tap may enter the backfilledtrench that houses the sewer piping. If the trench has been poorlybackfilled, the water will either pond or flow along the bottom ofthe trench. As these trenches usually run alongside the footings andcan be at a similar depth, it is not hard to see how any water that isthus directed into a trench can easily affect the foundation’s ability tosupport footings or even gain entry to the subfloor area.
Ground drainageIn all soils there is the capacity for water to travel on the surface andbelow it. Surface water flows can be established by inspection duringand after heavy or prolonged rain. If necessary, a grated drain systemconnected to the stormwater collection system is usually an easysolution.
It is, however, sometimes necessary when attempting to preventwater migration that testing be carried out to establish watertableheight and subsoil water flows. This subject is referred to in BTF 19and may properly be regarded as an area for an expert consultant.
Protection of the building perimeterIt is essential to remember that the soil that affects footings extendswell beyond the actual building line. Watering of garden plants,shrubs and trees causes some of the most serious water problems.
For this reason, particularly where problems exist or are likely tooccur, it is recommended that an apron of paving be installedaround as much of the building perimeter as necessary. This paving
CLASSIFICATION OF DAMAGE WITH REFERENCE TO WALLS
Description of typical damage and required repair Approximate crack width Damagelimit (see Note 3) category
Hairline cracks <0.1 mm 0
Fine cracks which do not need repair <1 mm 1
Cracks noticeable but easily filled. Doors and windows stick slightly <5 mm 2
Cracks can be repaired and possibly a small amount of wall will need 5–15 mm (or a number of cracks 3to be replaced. Doors and windows stick. Service pipes can fracture. 3 mm or more in one group)Weathertightness often impaired
Extensive repair work involving breaking-out and replacing sections of walls, 15–25 mm but also depend 4especially over doors and windows. Window and door frames distort. Walls lean on number of cracksor bulge noticeably, some loss of bearing in beams. Service pipes disrupted
should extend outwards a minimum of 900 mm (more in highlyreactive soil) and should have a minimum fall away from thebuilding of 1:60. The finished paving should be no less than 100mm below brick vent bases.
It is prudent to relocate drainage pipes away from this paving, ifpossible, to avoid complications from future leakage. If this is notpractical, earthenware pipes should be replaced by PVC andbackfilling should be of the same soil type as the surrounding soiland compacted to the same density.
Except in areas where freezing of water is an issue, it is wise toremove taps in the building area and relocate them well away fromthe building – preferably not uphill from it (see BTF 19).
It may be desirable to install a grated drain at the outside edge of thepaving on the uphill side of the building. If subsoil drainage isneeded this can be installed under the surface drain.
CondensationIn buildings with a subfloor void such as where bearers and joistssupport flooring, insufficient ventilation creates ideal conditions forcondensation, particularly where there is little clearance between thefloor and the ground. Condensation adds to the moisture alreadypresent in the subfloor and significantly slows the process of dryingout. Installation of an adequate subfloor ventilation system, eithernatural or mechanical, is desirable.
Warning: Although this Building Technology File deals withcracking in buildings, it should be said that subfloor moisture canresult in the development of other problems, notably:
• Water that is transmitted into masonry, metal or timber buildingelements causes damage and/or decay to those elements.
• High subfloor humidity and moisture content create an idealenvironment for various pests, including termites and spiders.
• Where high moisture levels are transmitted to the flooring andwalls, an increase in the dust mite count can ensue within theliving areas. Dust mites, as well as dampness in general, can be ahealth hazard to inhabitants, particularly those who areabnormally susceptible to respiratory ailments.
The gardenThe ideal vegetation layout is to have lawn or plants that requireonly light watering immediately adjacent to the drainage or pavingedge, then more demanding plants, shrubs and trees spread out inthat order.
Overwatering due to misuse of automatic watering systems is acommon cause of saturation and water migration under footings. Ifit is necessary to use these systems, it is important to remove gardenbeds to a completely safe distance from buildings.
Existing treesWhere a tree is causing a problem of soil drying or there is theexistence or threat of upheaval of footings, if the offending roots aresubsidiary and their removal will not significantly damage the tree,they should be severed and a concrete or metal barrier placedvertically in the soil to prevent future root growth in the direction ofthe building. If it is not possible to remove the relevant rootswithout damage to the tree, an application to remove the tree shouldbe made to the local authority. A prudent plan is to transplant likelyoffenders before they become a problem.
Information on trees, plants and shrubsState departments overseeing agriculture can give informationregarding root patterns, volume of water needed and safe distancefrom buildings of most species. Botanic gardens are also sources ofinformation. For information on plant roots and drains, see BuildingTechnology File 17.
ExcavationExcavation around footings must be properly engineered. Soilsupporting footings can only be safely excavated at an angle thatallows the soil under the footing to remain stable. This angle iscalled the angle of repose (or friction) and varies significantlybetween soil types and conditions. Removal of soil within the angleof repose will cause subsidence.
Remediation
Where erosion has occurred that has washed away soil adjacent tofootings, soil of the same classification should be introduced andcompacted to the same density. Where footings have beenundermined, augmentation or other specialist work may be required.Remediation of footings and foundations is generally the realm of aspecialist consultant.
Where isolated footings rise and fall because of swell/shrink effect,the homeowner may be tempted to alleviate floor bounce by fillingthe gap that has appeared between the bearer and the pier withblocking. The danger here is that when the next swell segment of thecycle occurs, the extra blocking will push the floor up into anaccentuated dome and may also cause local shear failure in the soil.If it is necessary to use blocking, it should be by a pair of finewedges and monitoring should be carried out fortnightly.
This BTF was prepared by John Lewer FAIB, MIAMA, Partner,Construction Diagnosis.
The information in this and other issues in the series was derived from various sources and was believed to be correct when published.
The information is advisory. It is provided in good faith and not claimed to be an exhaustive treatment of the relevant subject.
Further professional advice needs to be obtained before taking any action based on the information provided.
Distributed by
CSIRO PUBL ISHING PO Box 1139, Collingwood 3066, AustraliaFreecall 1800 645 051 Tel (03) 9662 7666 Fax (03) 9662 7555 www.publish.csiro.au
Email: [email protected]
© CSIRO 2003. Unauthorised copying of this Building Technology file is prohibited
Gardens for a reactive site