proposed large format retail, fast foods, gym & …

Rochdale Holdings Pty Ltd A.B.N. 85 009 049 067 trading as:

HERRING STORER ACOUSTICS P.O. Box 219, Como, W.A. 6952 (08) 9367 6200 [email protected]

PROPOSED LARGE FORMAT RETAIL, FAST FOODS, GYM & LIQUOR STORE DEVELOPMENT

LOT 7385, THE PROMENADE ELLENBROOK

ENVIRONMENTAL ACOUSTIC ASSESSMENT

MARCH 2021

OUR REFERENCE: 27377‐3‐21078

CITY OF SWAN STATUTORY PLANNING

DATE RECEIVED 9 APR 2021

Herring Storer Acoustics

DOCUMENT CONTROL PAGE

ENVIRONMENTAL ACOUSTIC ASSESSMENT PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ‐ ELLENBROOK

Job No: 21078

Document Reference : 27377‐3‐21078

FOR

PRIMEWEST MANAGEMENT Ltd

DOCUMENT INFORMATION

Author: Tim Reynolds Checked By: George Watts

Date of Issue: 10 March 2021

REVISION HISTORY

Revision Description Date Author Checked

1 Updated Site Plan 12/03/21 TR N/A

2 Change of Title 15/03/21 TR N/A

DOCUMENT DISTRIBUTION

Copy No. Version No. Destination Hard Copy Electronic Copy

1 1 Meyer Shircore Attn: Terrina Lo Email: [email protected]



This report has been prepared in accordance with the scope of services and on the basis of information and documents provided to Herring Storer Acoustics by the client. To the extent that this report relies on data and measurements taken at or under the times and conditions specified within the report and any findings, conclusions or recommendations only apply to those circumstances and no greater reliance should be assumed. The client acknowledges and agrees that the reports or presentations are provided by Herring Storer Acoustics to assist the client to conduct its own independent assessment.



Herring Storer Acoustics

CONTENTS

1. INTRODUCTION 1

2. SUMMARY 1

3. CRITERIA 1 3.1 Environmental Protection (Noise) Regulations 1997 1 3.2 Waste Collection 4

4. MODELLING 5 4.1 Mechanical Services 5 4.2 Deliveries 5 4.3 Noise Emissions From Gym 6 4.4 Voices Ordering 6

5. PREDICTED NOISE EMISSIONS 7

6. ASSESSMENT 7 6.1 LA10 Noise Emissions 7 6.2 LA1 Noise Emissions 10 6.3 LAMax Noise Emissions 11

7. CONCLUSION 12

APPENDICIES

A PLAN



Herring Storer Acoustics Our ref: 27377‐3‐21078 1

1. INTRODUCTION

Herring Storer Acoustics were commissioned to undertake an acoustic assessment of noise emissions associated with the proposed Large Format Retail, Fast Food, Gym and Liquor Store development at Lot 7385, The Promenade, Ellenbrook. This report assesses noise emissions from the premises with regards to compliance with the requirements of the Environmental Protection (Noise) Regulations 1997. Noise sources considered as part of this assessment, as requested by council, include :

‐ Mechanical Services; ‐ Delivery vehicles; ‐ Noise breakout from the gym; and ‐ Voices within drive‐thrus.

Comment is also provided with regards to noise associated with waste collection. For reference, the site plan for the proposed development is attached in Appendix A.

2. SUMMARY

The closest neighbouring residences to this development have been identified as shown in Figure 3.1. From the analysis undertaken, noise emissions from the proposed development has been assessed to comply with the requirements of the Environmental Protection (Noise) Regulations 1997 at all times. However, the following are recommended to be imposed as conditions :

The mechanical services design needs to be confirmed during the design development phase. An acoustic study of the mechanical services needs to be undertaken once the design has been finalised, to ensure compliance is achieved.

Depending on the final design, screens to the ordering areas for fast food outlets 6 and 7 could be required. An acoustic study of the ordering area for fast food outlets 6 and 7 needs to be undertaken once the design has been finalised, to ensure compliance is achieved.

Waste collections to be undertaken under in accordance with the requirements of Regulation 14A – “Waste collection and other works”.

3. CRITERIA

3.1 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (NOISE) REGULATIONS 1997

The allowable noise level for noise sensitive premises in the vicinity of the proposed Large Format Retail development is prescribed by the Environmental Protection (Noise) Regulations 1997. Regulations 7 and 8 stipulate maximum allowable external noise levels or assigned noise levels that can be received at a premise from another premises. For residential premises, this noise level is determined by the calculation of an influencing factor, which is then added to the base levels shown below. The influencing factor is calculated for the usage of land within two circles, having radii of 100m and 450m from the premises of concern. The base noise levels for residential premises and the assigned noise levels for industrial premises are listed in Table 3.1.




TABLE 3.1 ‐ BASELINE ASSIGNED OUTDOOR NOISE LEVEL

Premises Receiving Noise

Time of Day Assigned Level (dB)

LA10 LA1 LAmax

Noise sensitive premises: highly sensitive area

0700 ‐ 1900 hours Monday to Saturday (Day) 45 + IF 55 + IF 65 + IF

0900 ‐ 1900 hours Sunday and Public Holidays (Sunday / Public Holiday Day)

40 + IF 50 + IF 65 + IF

1900 ‐ 2200 hours all days (Evening) 40 + IF 50 + IF 55 + IF

2200 hours on any day to 0700 hours Monday to Saturday and 0900 hours Sunday and Public Holidays (Night)

35 + IF 45 + IF 55 + IF

Note: LA10 is the noise level exceeded for 10% of the time. LA1 is the noise level exceeded for 1% of the time. LAmax is the maximum noise level. IF is the influencing factor.

It is a requirement that received noise be free of annoying characteristics (tonality, modulation and impulsiveness), defined below as per Regulation 9.

“impulsiveness” means a variation in the emission of a noise where the difference

between LApeak and LAmax(Slow) is more than 15 dB when determined for a single representative event;

“modulation” means a variation in the emission of noise that –

(a) is more than 3 dB LAFast or is more than 3 dB LAFast in any one‐third octave band;

(b) is present for more at least 10% of the representative assessment period; and

(c) is regular, cyclic and audible;

“tonality” means the presence in the noise emission of tonal characteristics where the difference between –

(a) the A‐weighted sound pressure level in any one‐third octave band; and

(b) the arithmetic average of the A‐weighted sound pressure levels in the 2 adjacent one‐third octave bands,

is greater than 3 dB when the sound pressure levels are determined as LAeq,T levels where the time period T is greater than 10% of the representative assessment period, or greater than 8 dB at any time when the sound pressure levels are determined as LASlow levels.

Where the noise emission is not music, if the above characteristics exist and cannot be practicably removed, then any measured level is adjusted according to Table 3.2 below.

TABLE 3.2 ‐ ADJUSTMENTS TO MEASURED LEVELS

Where tonality is present Where modulation is present Where impulsiveness is present

+5 dB(A) +5 dB(A) +10 dB(A)

Note: These adjustments are cumulative to a maximum of 15 dB.

For this development, the closest residential premises of concern are located to the north east, as shown on Figure 3.1 below. Each individual premises have been considered in our assessment, however, to simplify reporting, only the highest noise level for each scenario considered has been reported.




FIGURE 3.1 – AREA AROUND PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT

The influencing factor at the nearest residential locations has been determined to be +8 dB, as summarised in Table 3.3.

TABLE 3.3 – INFLUENCING FACTOR

Influencing Factor Parameter Influencing Factor (dB)

20% Commercial land use with inner circle + 1

20% Commercial land use with inner circle +1

Major Road (The Promenade) +6

TOTAL IF +8

Based on the above, the assigned noise levels are as listed in Table 3.4.

TABLE 3.4 ‐ ASSIGNED OUTDOOR NOISE LEVELS

Premises Receiving Noise

Time of Day Assigned Level (dB)

LA 10 LA 1 LA max

Noise sensitive premises : Highly sensitive area

0700 ‐ 1900 hours Monday to Saturday 53 63 73

0900 ‐ 1900 hours Sunday and Public Holidays 48 58 73

1900 ‐ 2200 hours all days 48 58 63

2200 hours on any day to 0700 hours Monday to Saturday and 0900 hours Sunday and Public Holidays

43 53 63

Note: LA10 is the noise level exceeded for 10% of the time. LA1 is the noise level exceeded for 1% of the time. LAmax is the maximum noise level.




3.2 WASTE COLLECTION

It is noted that under the Environmental Protection (Noise) Regulations 1997, the noise received at a premise from the collection of waste does not need to comply with the Assigned Noise levels, provided it is carried out in accordance with Regulation 14A of the Regulations. In summary, waste collection carried out during the following times do not need to comply with the Assigned noise levels :

- 0700 hours and 1900 hours on any day that is not a Sunday or a public holiday;

Or

- 0900 hours and 1900 hours on a Sunday or public holiday. For information waste collection carried out during the above times is classified as class 1 works. Class 2 works means specified works carried out otherwise than between the hours specified in the definition of class 1 works.

Note : Class 2 works, also do not need to comply with the assigned noise levels, provided certain requirements, including operating under an approved Noise Management Plan, are followed.

For information it is also noted that, under the Regulations, the above requirements

applies to “specified works”. Specified works, includes :

(a) the collection of waste; or

(b) the cleaning of a road or the drains for a road; or

(c) the cleaning of public places, including footpaths, cycle paths, car parks and

beaches; or

(d) the maintenance of road verges and public open space (including the

collection of rubbish and the planting, trimming, watering or removal of

trees); or

(e) the periodic collection of household items or other things placed on street

verges by residents for the purpose of such a collection; or

(f) activities associated with hazard or emergency management.

Waste means waste from domestic or commercial sources and includes :

(a) putrescible waste; and

(b) non putrescible waste; and

(c) recyclable materials.

Thus, based on the above, noise emissions from waste collections do not need to be

assessed and does not form part of the acoustical assessment.




4. MODELLING Modelling of the noise propagation from the proposed development was carried out using an environmental noise modelling computer program, “SoundPlan”. Calculations were carried out using the EPA worst case weather conditions as stated in the Environmental Protection Authority’s “Draft Guideline on Environmental Noise for Prescribed Premises”.

4.1 MECHANICAL SERVICES

It is noted that mechanical services have not been selected at this stage of the development, thus, it is not possible to use actual equipment selections in our calculations. Hence, typical noise levels for air conditioners associated with tenancies of the size proposed has been utilized. The noise modelling is conservative, as it does not include any diversity in load, which would occur (particularly during the night period).

The calculations for the mechanical services were based upon the sound power levels listed in Tables 4.1.

TABLE 4.1 – GENERAL SOUND POWER LEVELS

MECHANICAL SERVICES

Item of Equipment Sound Power Level, (dB(A))

Gym AC ‐ 2 @ 75

1,001m2 Showrooms (each) AC ‐ 3 @ 80

350m2 Showrooms and 455m2 Showroom (each) AC ‐ 2 @ 75

Liquor Store AC ‐ 1 @ 75

Refrigeration unit 1 @ 83

Fast Foods 1 – 5 (each) AC ‐ 1 @ 75

Exhaust 1 @ 72

Fast Foods 7 and 7 (each) AC ‐ 2 @ 75

Evap unit 1 @ 83 Exhaust 2 @ 72

It is noted equipment selected during the design phase of the development will need to have noise emissions confirmed in relation to the above assumed noise levels. With regards to noise emissions, the following are noted:

1 Noise associated with the mechanical services does not take into account any diversity of operation. Such diversity would occur during the evening and night periods (whilst cooler). Thus, this is a conservative assessment.

2 The location of the mechanical plant has been assumed to be on the roof of the tenancies, with screening to the plant.

4.2 DELIVERIES

The LA1 assigned noise level would be the pertinent prescribed noise level in this instance (for deliveries) as the duration of time that the noise of the deliveries is present is less than 10% of a representative time period. The noise associated with the delivery is the manoeuvring of the truck into place, upon which the truck is switched off – hence – even if the delivery takes some time (i.e. 30 – 60 minutes) the noise level associated with the truck is not present throughout the duration of the delivery.

The calculations for delivery trucks were based in the sound power levels listed in Tables 4.2.




TABLE 4.2 – GENERAL SOUND POWER LEVELS DELIVERY TRUCKS


Showroom / Liquor Store 84

Fast Food 85

4.3 NOISE EMISSIONS FROM GYM

With regards to noise breakout from the gym, we note that normally gyms, for safety, use “pinned” weight machines, such these weights cannot be dropped and the noise of weights dropping is limited to the barbells. Additionally, although they do play background music within gyms, the noise levels within these spaces is limited and the building structure will contain the noise generated. Even so, for information we have undertaken an assessment of noise breakout from the gym with regards to the Regulatory criteria. For this this assessment noise emissions from a gym class has been used, as it is typically, marginally higher than the noise within the normal gym area, as gym personnel need to provide instructions. Additionally, an assessment of a 15kg barbell dropping has also been assessed. The sound power levels used in the assessment are listed in Table 4.3. It is noted that noise from the gym instructor would need to comply with the assigned LA10 noise levels. However, noise from the barbell dropping would need to comply with the assigned LAMax noise levels.

TABLE 4.3 – GYM SOUND POWER LEVELS


Class 73

Barbell 84

4.4 VOICES ORDERING

Noise modelling was undertaken for voices within the drive thru’s, including ordering speakers within Fast Food Outlets 6 and 7. The noise emissions associated with voices and ordering speaker are listed in Table 4.4.

TABLE 4.4 – SUMMARY OF NOISE EMISSIONS FROM OPERATIONS


Voice 73

Ordering Speaker 83

Note : Preliminary modelling indicated that noise received at the closest residences

to the north from the ordering speakers could exceed the assigned night period noise level. Thus, noise modelling includes 1.8 m high screening to the northern side of the ordering area.




5. PREDICTED NOISE EMISSIONS

Calculations were undertaken to all the residences noted on Figure 3.1. The resultant noise levels are listed in Table 5.1. Note : Noise levels were calculated at all adjacent noise sensitive premises, however, for

simplicity of reporting, only the highest noise levels have been included below.

TABLE 5.1 – CALCULATED NOISE LEVELS

Item Residences (dB(A))

West North East

Mechanical services 33 LA10 36 LA10 32 LA10

Deliveries 31 LA1 48 LA1 42 LA1

Gym Classes Weights

15 LA10 26 LAMax

11 LA10 22 LAMax

5 LA10

16 LAMax

Voices Voices Ordering Speaker

0 LA10 1 LA10

35 LA10 37 LA10

29 LA10 39 LA10

6. ASSESSMENT The following provided the acoustic assessment for the noise sources requiring compliance, as listed in Table 5.1.

6.1 LA10 NOISE EMISSIONS

Noise emissions from the mechanical services would be steady state and would operate for the majority of time. Hence noise received from the mechanical services needs to comply with the assigned LA10 noise level. Additionally, noise emission from the following noise source would also occur for more than 10% of the time and would be assessed under the assigned LA10 noise Level :

‐ Gym Glasses; and ‐ Voices, including ordering speaker.

Given the resultant noise level at the residences and likely background noise level in the area, we believe that noise emissions from the mechanical services are likely to be tonal, hence, a +5 dB(A) penalty has been applied to the calculated noise level associated with these noise sources. Table 6.1 lists the characteristics that should be included in the assessable noise level.

TABLE 6.1 – APPLICABLE ADJUSTMENTS AND ASSESSABLE LA10 NOISE LEVELS, dB(A)

MECHANICAL SERVICES

Location Calculated Noise Level, dB(A)

Applicable Adjustments to Measured Noise Levels, dB(A) Assessable

Noise Level, dB(A)

Where Noise Emission is NOT music

Tonality Modulation Impulsiveness

West 33 +5 ‐ ‐ 38

North 36 +5 ‐ ‐ 41

East 32 +5 ‐ ‐ 37




Table 6.2 shows the applicable Assigned Noise Levels, and assessable noise level emissions associated for the scenarios associated with the mechanical services.

TABLE 6.2 – ASSESSMENT OF LA10 NOISE LEVEL EMISSIONS MECHANICAL SERVICES

Location Assessable Noise

Level, dB(A) Applicable Times of Day

Applicable Assigned LA10

Noise Level (dB)

Exceedance to Assigned Noise

Level (dB)

West 38

Day Period 53 Complies

Sunday Day Period 48 Complies

Evenings 48 Complies

Night 43 Complies

North 41




Night 43 Complies

East 37




Night 43 Complies

Noise received from the gym classes, would be dominated by noise associated with the instructors voice, which would not contain any annoying characteristics. However, the noise does contain a component of music. Thus, although not applicable at the resultant noise level, to be conservative, the +10 dB(A) penalty for music has been applied. Table 6.3 lists the characteristics that should be included in the assessable noise level.

TABLE 6.3 – APPLICABLE ADJUSTMENTS AND ASSESSABLE LA10 NOISE LEVELS, dB(A)

GYM CLASSES

Location Calculated Noise Level, dB(A)


Noise Level, dB(A)

Where Noise Emission is music

Not Impulsive Impulsiveness

West 15 +10 ‐ 25

North 11 +10 ‐ 21

East 5 +10 ‐ 15

Table 6.4 shows the applicable Assigned Noise Levels, and assessable noise level emissions associated for the scenarios associated with the gym classes.




TABLE 6.4 – ASSESSMENT OF LA10 NOISE LEVEL EMISSIONS GYM CLASSES


Level, dB(A)

Applicable Times of Day


Noise Level (dB)


Level (dB)

West 25




Night 43 Complies

North 21




Night 43 Complies

East 15




Night 43 Complies

Noise received from voices, including ordering speaker, within the drive thru’s, would not contain any annoying characteristics. Thus, the assessable noise level would be as listed in Table 5.1 above.

Tables 6.5 and 6.6 shows the applicable Assigned Noise Levels, and assessable noise level emissions associated for the scenarios associated with voice, including ordering speakers.

TABLE 6.5 – ASSESSMENT OF LA10 NOISE LEVEL EMISSIONS

VOICES




Noise Level (dB)


Level (dB)

West 0




Night 43 Complies

North 35




Night 43 Complies

East 29




Night 43 Complies




TABLE 6.6 – ASSESSMENT OF LA10 NOISE LEVEL EMISSIONS ORDERING SPEAKER




Noise Level (dB)


Level (dB)

West 1




Night 43 Complies

North 37




Night 43 Complies

East 39




Night 43 Complies

6.2 LA1 NOISE EMISSIONS

Noise emissions from deliveries would be present for less than 10% of a representative time period, hence noise received from this noise source needs to comply with the assigned LA1 noise level.

Based on the definitions of tonality, noise emissions from these sources, being an LA1 and being present for less than 10% of the time, would not be considered tonal. Thus, no penalties would be applicable to the noise associated with delivery trucks. Hence, Table 6.7 shows the applicable Assigned Noise Levels, and assessable noise level emissions associated for the scenarios associated with the above noise sources.

TABLE 6.7 – ASSESSMENT OF LA1 NOISE LEVEL EMISSIONS

DELIVERIES




Noise Level (dB)


Level (dB)

West 31




Night 53 Complies

North 48




Night 53 Complies

East 42




Night 53 Complies




6.3 LAMAX NOISE EMISSIONS Noise emissions from the gym weights would be present for less than 1% of a representative time period, hence noise received from this noise source needs to comply with the assigned LAMax noise level.

Given the resultant noise level at the residences, the likely background noise level in the area and the definition of tonality, noise received at the neighbouring residences from gym weights would not be considered tonal. However, this source could be impulsive. Therefore, to be conservative, a +10dB penalty for impulsiveness has been applied. Table 6.8 lists the characteristics that should be included in the assessable noise level for gym weights.

TABLE 6.8 – APPLICABLE ADJUSTMENTS AND ASSESSABLE LA1MAX NOISE LEVELS, dB(A)

GYM WEIGHTS

Location Calculated Noise Level,

dB(A)


Noise Level, dB(A)

Where Noise Emission is NOT music

Tonality Modulation Impulsiveness

West 26 ‐ ‐ +10 36

North 22 ‐ ‐ +10 32

East 16 ‐ ‐ +10 26

Table 6.9 shows the applicable Assigned Noise Levels, and assessable noise level emissions associated for the scenarios associated with gym weights.

TABLE 6.9 – ASSESSMENT OF LAMax NOISE LEVEL EMISSIONS

GYM WEIGHTS



Applicable Assigned LAmax Noise Level (dB)


Level (dB)

West 36




Night 63 Complies

North 32




Night 63 Complies

East 26




Night 63 Complies




7. CONCLUSION

From the above assessments, the noise received at the neighbouring residences complies with the requirements of the Environmental Protection (Noise) Regulations 1997 at all times. However, the following are recommended to be imposed as conditions :

The mechanical services design needs to be confirmed during design development phase. An acoustic study of the mechanical services needs to be undertaken once the design has been finalised, to ensure compliance is achieved.

Depending on the final design, screens to the ordering areas for fast food outlets 6 and 7 could be required. An acoustic study of the ordering area for fast food outlets 6 and 7 needs to be undertaken once the design has been finalised, to ensure compliance is achieved.

Waste collections to be undertaken under in accordance with the requirements of Regulation 14A – “Waste collection and other works”.



APPENDIX A

PLAN



PROPOSED LOT 1REFER MSA PROJECT 8383

Relocated Transformer

Proposed 9m

Crossover

Proposed Deceleration Lane

T H E P R O M E N A D E

W E

S T

B R

O O

K P

A R

A D

E

B R

O O

K M

O U

N T

D R

I V EOriginal Position

Of TransformerShown Dashed

Western Power Easements

Pylon Sign 2

Fast Food 7.

G.F.A

275m²

Drive

Thru

'

Drive Thru'133m²

Liquor Store

Pro

posed 9

mC

rossove

r

Pro

pose

d 10

m

Cro

ssov

er

ServiceAreaTotal G.F.A 453m²

Fast Food 1.G.F.A 105m²

ShowroomF.F.L 52.50

LoadingArea

Drive

Thr

u'

Bins

Proposed 10mCrossover

CROSSOVER TO EDGE OF ROUND-A-BOUT

51000

GymF.F.L 52.00

ServiceArea

Fast Food 6.G.F.A 183m²Outdoor Dining28m²

Fast Food 2.G.F.A 90m² Fast Food 4.G.F.A 120m²

Fast Food 5.G.F.A 200m²

ServiceArea

LoadingArea

BinsAreaM

F

230m²

B.O.H90m²

CommonAlfrescoArea

Directional

Signage

DirectionalSignage

BinsAreaFast Food 3.G.F.A 120m²

Bins

Bins

Bins

Tenancy 1G.F.A 700m²

ShowroomF.F.L 52.00

Tenancy 2G.F.A 1,001m²

Tenancy 3G.F.A 1,001m²

ShowroomF.F.L 52.50


ShowroomF.F.L 52.50


ShowroomF.F.L 52.50


51.50

52.00

51.90

51.00

51.95

51.9

5

52.4

5

52.45

52.4

5

52.4

5

51.40

52.00

52.30

52.30

51.80

52.45

52.45

52.30

Building 1

Building 2

Building 3

9829

24460

2500

17000

2000

610

0

550

0

200

0

2224

5

5650 84

032

0015

0032

0010

0060

00 1000

2000

5500

6900

1798

3300

12941

7496

5500

61001500

3500285

10198

2535

5500

6265

2500

10500

8000

8000

9400

4525

14100

7500

2295

33225

6039

14260

12340

5570

7565

5500 6000 55002500

28740

7035

30757

M

F T

T

T

M

FFM

Proposed Crossover to City of Swan specifications




F.F.L 51.60

'KFC

'

F.F.L 52.00

'TACO BELL'

DirectionalSignage

DirectionalSignage

Pylon Sign 1

Site Criteria

1. Site Areaa. Site Area

2. Landscapinga. Required 10% of Site Area b. Provided

Soft Hard

Total

3. Floor Area (GFA)a. Showroomsb. Liquor Showroomc. Fast Food (1-7)d. Gym

Total

4. Carparkingi. Cars Requireda. Showrooms 3,197m² @ 2.5/100b. Liquor Showroom 453m² @ 5/100c. Fast Food (1-7) 1,093m² @ 5/100d. Gym 200ppl @ 1/4

Total Car Required

ii. Cars Provideda. Liquor Store Drive Thru'b. Fast Foods Drive Thru'c. On grade

Total Car Provided

17,902m²

1,790m²

1,574m² 1,304m² 2,914m² (16.27%)

3,197m² 453m²1,093m² 700m²5,443m²

79.9 Cars 22.7 Cars 54.65 Cars 50.0 Cars207.25 Cars

6 Cars 24 Cars190 Cars220 Cars

LandscapingA. Hard Landscaping

Defined as paved walkways either open or covered.B. Soft Landscaping

Defined as vegetative landscaping.

Gross Floor Area : GFAA. All Floor Areas on this plan are shown as GROSS FLOOR AREA. Unless otherwise noted as Nett Floor AreaB. Definition of Gross Floor Area is defined as: i/ GROSS FLOOR AREA OF TENANCY: Gross Floor Area of an individual Tenancy is defined as the area contained between the centre line of common tenancywalls and the outside edge of external walls.

ii/ GROSS FLOOR AREA OF A BUILDING: Gross Floor Area of a Building is defined as the total area contained between the outside edge of external walls

Nett Floor Area : NFAA. Nett Floor Area of a Tenancy on this plan is defined as the area

between external or tenancy dividing walls.B. This area is inclusive of toilets if the toilets are exclusive to the

Tenancy.

As indicated @ B14

02/16/21SK016PROPOSED LARGE FORMATE RETAIL DEVELOPMENT

FOR:PRIMEWESTLOCATION:LOT 7385 THE PROMENADE, ELLENBROOK 8391

SCALE: 1 : 500

SITE PLAN

5 10 15 20 25 50

PRELIMINARY

N



proposed large format retail, fast foods, gym & …

Documents