proper implementation of the msy -concept in the cfp

20
Proper Implementation of the MSY-Concept in the CFP European Parliament Brussels, 29 Nov 2011 Rainer Froese, IFM-GEOMAR

Upload: clarke-stephenson

Post on 02-Jan-2016

30 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

Proper Implementation of the MSY -Concept in the CFP. European Parliament Brussels, 29 Nov 2011 Rainer Froese, IFM-GEOMAR. Overview. Four terms Legal background MSY -Concept applied to European fish stocks ‚Make-or-break‘ issues with the CFP reform. Four Terms. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Proper Implementation of the MSY -Concept in the CFP

Proper Implementation of theMSY-Concept in the CFP

European ParliamentBrussels, 29 Nov 2011

Rainer Froese, IFM-GEOMAR

Page 2: Proper Implementation of the MSY -Concept in the CFP

Overview

• Four terms• Legal background• MSY-Concept applied to European fish stocks• ‚Make-or-break‘ issues with the CFP reform

Page 3: Proper Implementation of the MSY -Concept in the CFP

Four Terms • Biomass (B) is the body-weight of all fish in the

water• MSY is the Maximum Sustainable Yield that

can be taken from a population (=stock) of fish indefinitely

• Bmsy is the biomass that a fish stock must have, so that it can deliver the maximum sustainable yield MSY

• Fmsy is the fishing pressure (the proportion of fish killed by fishing) resulting in Bmsy

Page 4: Proper Implementation of the MSY -Concept in the CFP

Biomass and Yield ofEastern Baltic Cod

Froese & Proelß Fish & Fisheries 2010

Page 5: Proper Implementation of the MSY -Concept in the CFP

Fishing Mortality of European Fish Stocks

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015

Year

Fis

hin

g p

ress

ure

(F/Fmsy

)

TargetPrecautionary

Overfishing

TrendThreatening the stock

Average fishing pressure on European fish stocks. The lower arrow indicates the path if 75% of the stocks were to be fished at the maximum sustainable rate in 2015. However, with the trend since 2000, that target will be missed by more than 30 years.

Froese and Proelß Fish & Fisheries 2010

CFP

Page 6: Proper Implementation of the MSY -Concept in the CFP

Status of European Fish Stocks

6Landings from ICES 2010, MSY from Froese and Proelß 2010

Page 7: Proper Implementation of the MSY -Concept in the CFP

Legal Background

• The Law of the Sea (UNCLOS 1982), in force since 1994, requires countries to maintain stocks in their EEZ such that they can produce MSY

• The precautionary principle is contained in the EU-Treaty. It requires that in case of uncertainty, the less dangerous margin of error has to be used as target. This is explicitly applicable to the use of natural resources.

• UNFSA (1995) clarifies that after recovery, F has to be smaller than Fmsy.

• So far, UNCLOS and UNFSA have been implemented by New Zealand, Australia and the USA.

7

Page 8: Proper Implementation of the MSY -Concept in the CFP

Why is a Proper Implementation of the MSY-Concept of Global Importance? • 42% of the global trade in fish and fish products

is imported by Europe• A CFP reform that correctly implements the Law

of the Sea and UNFSA, such as done by USA, NZ and AUS, will force others to follow

• A failed CFP reform will encourage continued overfishing, in Europe and globally

• US$ 1.2 billion European fish exports into the USA will be endangered

8

Page 9: Proper Implementation of the MSY -Concept in the CFP

The First ‚Make-or-Break‘ Issue with the Basic Regulation Proposal

Article 6 and others prescribe that stocks are to be maintained ABOVE levels that can produce the maximum sustainable yield.

This is a proper implementation of UNCLOS, UNFSA, and the precautionary principle.

Page 10: Proper Implementation of the MSY -Concept in the CFP

MSY-Concept for European Stocks

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

1.6

0 0.5 1 1.5 2

Biomass / BMSY

Lan

din

gs

/ MSY

B MSY 1.3 B MSY

MSY

0.9 MSY

Froese et al. 2011 Fish and Fisheries

Below MSY-Level Above MSY-Level

Page 11: Proper Implementation of the MSY -Concept in the CFP

Below MSY Level

• Stressed ecosystems• Small fish• Small stock size• High fluctuations• Low, uncertain catch• High effort /cost• Low / no profit• Low impact impossible• MPAs problematic• Subsidies necessary• Social status low (stubborn

overexploiters)

Above MSY Level

• Healthy ecosystems• Large fish• Large stock sizes• Low fluctuations• High, certain catch• Low effort /cost• High profit• Low impact possible• MPAs unproblematic• Subsidies not necessary• Social status high (respected

custodians)

11

Page 12: Proper Implementation of the MSY -Concept in the CFP

How to get Above MSY-Level?

Background Info:The faster Above-MSY level is reached, the higher the overall profits in the fishery The fastest way is to close the fishery for 1-3 years, depending on the stock. This would bring the most profit to the fishery, but fishers still don‘t want it.

12

Page 13: Proper Implementation of the MSY -Concept in the CFP

Simulated Recovery ofNorth Sea Cod: Catches

13

1 Comparison of two management scenarios with respect to total removals, which consist of landings, discards, and unreported catches: the bold line is the actual management, the broken line represents a simulated recovery, with only discard mortality in 2003-2005, and fishing at Fmsy from 2006 onward.

Page 14: Proper Implementation of the MSY -Concept in the CFP

Simulated Recovery of North Sea Cod: Biomass

14

1 Comparison of two management scenarios for the North Sea cod with respect to spawning stock biomass: the bold line is actual management; the broken line is a simulated recovery with three year closure and then fishing at Fmsy. Note that thesimulated recovery is based on actual recruitment.

Page 15: Proper Implementation of the MSY -Concept in the CFP

Simulated Recovery ofNorth Sea Cod: Profits

15

Comparison of two management scenarios with respect to profits, which consist of the difference between revenues (market price of cod times landings) and fishing costs: the bold line are profits according to STECF data, the broken line represents profits from simulated recovery, with only discard mortality (zero profits) in 2003-2005, and fishing at Fmsy from 2006 onward (Froese and Quaas, submitted).

Page 16: Proper Implementation of the MSY -Concept in the CFP

How to Get Above MSY-Level?

1. For stocks where F at or below Fmsy: reduce F to 0.9 or 0.75 Fmsy

2. For stocks where F > Fmsy : reduce F to Fmsy by 2014 (transition period), apply 1) thereafter.

3. For stocks where F > Fmsy : if a good year-class is coming in, don‘t increase catches. This will reduce F and will allow the recruits to rebuild the stock, without pain for the fishers.

16

Page 17: Proper Implementation of the MSY -Concept in the CFP

Biomass and Yield ofEastern Baltic Cod

Froese & Proelß Fish & Fisheries 2010

Page 18: Proper Implementation of the MSY -Concept in the CFP

The Second ‚Make-or-Break‘ Issues in the Basic Regulation Proposal

Article 16: The Council of Ministers is to fix 100+ fishing opportunities every year. This is political micro-management.Instead, the Council should only fix long-term mangement plans and other policies and leave the application to the administration.

Article 16 needs to be changed.

Page 19: Proper Implementation of the MSY -Concept in the CFP

Refs and Acknowledgements• Froese, R. and M. Quaas. 2011. Three options for rebuilding the cod stock

in the eastern Baltic Sea. Marine Ecology Progress Series 434:197-2011.• Froese, R., T.A. Branch, A. Proelß, M. Quaas, K. Sainsbury and C.

Zimmermann. 2011. Generic harvest control rules for European fisheries. Fish and Fisheries 12:340-351

• Froese, R. and A. Proelß. 2010. Rebuilding fish stocks no later than 2015: will Europe meet the deadline? Fish and Fisheries 11:194-202

Page 20: Proper Implementation of the MSY -Concept in the CFP

Thank You

Rainer [email protected]

www.fishbase.de/rfroeseIFM-GEOMAR, Kiel