promotion & enforcement fda’s social media guidance

42
Promotion & Enforcement FDA’s Social Media Guidance

Upload: monica-newman

Post on 13-Dec-2015

224 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Promotion & Enforcement

FDA’s Social Media Guidance

Basic Regulatory Concepts• Content provided in online and social media forums

are subject to the same regulatory framework as traditional media.– Could be “labeling” subject to FDA’s jurisdiction

• “Intended use” standard still applies– Likely to be “advertising” per the FTC’s

jurisdiction

• Stationary and mobile environments also subject to same standards relative to claims and disclosures

How do third-parties factor in?

FDA’s Draft Guidance

FDA on User Generated Content

Section 230• “No provider or user of an interactive

computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.”*

• Effectively, in many circumstances, this section immunizes both ISPs and Internet users from liability for torts committed by others using their website or online forum.

* Myers, Ken S. (Fall 2006), Wikimmunity: Fitting the Communications Decency Act to Wikipedia, Harvard Journal of Law & Technology 20: 163, SSRN 916529

What about other products?

Back to Zarbee’s

Where does this leave us? If UGC posted on a company site is truly

independent, the company is not liable for it (probably)

Notwithstanding, a company can be held liable if it endorses, highlights, or actively solicits non-compliant comments

OPDP 2014 Enforcement Lessons

Enforcement Activity Declining

Social Media Enforcement

22%

of OPDP letters were social media/space-limited

15

16

The Violations

• Omission of risk information• Omission of material facts

17

18

19

The Violations

• Omission of risk information• Inadequate presentation of

established name• Lack of adequate directions for use• Failure to submit 2253

20

The 2009 Violations

• Omission of risk information• Failure to use established name• Inadequate communication of indication• Overstatement of efficacy

21

Lessons from 2014 Activity

• Promulgate your policies• Regularly monitor prominent platforms• Control your “agents”

22

FDA & Social Media: A Case Study of Open Issues

Joy Liu

Ropes & Gray LLP

Case Study Facts

• Rando Pharma markets XYRIKASE (rivocrinogrel)

• XYRIKASE is approved in patients with a history of myocardial infarction (MI) for the reduction of the thrombotic cardiovascular events of cardiovascular death, MI, and urgent coronary revascularization. – Contraindicated in patients with active pathological

bleeding or a history of stroke

– Label includes warning of increased risk of bleeding

– Bleeding, including life-threatening and fatal bleeding, is the most commonly reported adverse reaction.

– Discontinue 7 days before planned surgery

24

31

31

UGC General Rules

• Company is not responsible for “truly independent” user generated content (“UGC”)– UGC not produced by Company– UGC not produced on behalf of Company– UGC not prompted by Company

• Company is not responsible for UGC when– User has no affiliation with company AND– Company had no influence on the UGC

32

34

35

36

37

38

Take Away

• Your company policy should:– Specify that only authorized employees

are permitted to engage in social media on behalf of the company

– Identify the parameters of employees’ personal use of social media

39

40

41

42

Take Away

• Your internal review process should evaluate not only the proposed language of the company’s post, but also the potential responses to the post

43

44

Take Away

• Establish objective criteria that help dictate when your company will correct misinformation

• Be prepared to re-evaluate those criteria periodically in light of the UGC specific to your company’s social media activity