project requests – triage/prioritization process september 17 th, 2007 atlanta wgm david hamill...
TRANSCRIPT
Project Requests – Triage/Prioritization Process
September 17th, 2007
Atlanta WGM
David Hamill
Director, Project Management Office
September, 2007 WGM - Atlanta Project Requests – Triage/Prioritization Process 2
Key Initiative
With the T3F, develop the criteria/process for triaging and prioritizing project requests and put in place by the Plenary meeting
September, 2007 WGM - Atlanta Project Requests – Triage/Prioritization Process 3
Current vs. New
Current
1. Create Scope Statement
2. TC Review
3. PMO Review
4. ARB Review
5. PMO/TTPL Oversee Methodology
New
1. Create Scope Statement
2. TC Review
3. SD Review
4. PMO/TSC Review
5. PMO/PSC Oversee Methodology
September, 2007 WGM - Atlanta Project Requests – Triage/Prioritization Process 4
Current Process
1. Project Facilitator creates a Project Scope Statement.
2. Technical Committee reviews and approves Scope Statement. Project Facilitator resolves any issues.
3. Project Facilitator (co-chair) submits Project Scope Statement to PMO. PMO reviews and approves Scope Statement. Project Facilitator resolves any issues.
4. PMO submits the Scope Statement to the ARB for review. ARB reviews Scope Statement.Project Facilitator resolves any issues brought forth by ARB
5. PMO and Project Lifecycle Transition Team insures that the HL7 project methodology is adhered to throughout the project.
September, 2007 WGM - Atlanta Project Requests – Triage/Prioritization Process 5
New Process
Step 1
Project Facilitator creates a Project Scope Statement.
September, 2007 WGM - Atlanta Project Requests – Triage/Prioritization Process 6
New Process
Step 2
Technical Committee reviews and approves Scope Statement.
Project Facilitator resolves any issues.
September, 2007 WGM - Atlanta Project Requests – Triage/Prioritization Process 7
New Process
Step 3 (replaces the approval work currently done by the ARB)
Project Facilitator notifies the “new” TSC of the new Scope Statement
Project Facilitator indicates the appropriate Steering Division needs to review/approve Scope Statement for criteria such as:
• Is this project within the scope of work done by HL7
• Is it within the scope of the sponsoring committee
• How is it related to other projects
• How is it related to the activities of other committees
• SD indicates priority within SD, if necessary. Priority is based on resources, target dates and technical strategies.
September, 2007 WGM - Atlanta Project Requests – Triage/Prioritization Process 8
New Process
Step 3 continued
SD review could result in the following:
Amended scope statement
Project needs to be reviewed (jointly or separately) by another SD
Board approval may be necessary if the project requires internal or external funding or collaboration with an external body
Project Facilitator resolves any issues brought forth by the SD.
September, 2007 WGM - Atlanta Project Requests – Triage/Prioritization Process 9
New Process
Step 4
Project Facilitator (co-chair) submits Project Scope Statement to PMO.
PMO reviews and approves Scope Statement.
Project Facilitator resolves any issues.
September, 2007 WGM - Atlanta Project Requests – Triage/Prioritization Process 10
New Process
Step 4 continued
Steering Division submits Scope Statement to TSC for approval.
TSC approval includes the following:
Validate points identified by SD and PMO
Assign a TSC level priority
The SD & TSC reviews replace the ARB review, however the ARB may be called upon to resolve architectural issues.
September, 2007 WGM - Atlanta Project Requests – Triage/Prioritization Process 11
New Process
Step 5
PMO and Project Services Committee insure that the HL7 project methodology is adhered to throughout the project.
September, 2007 WGM - Atlanta Project Requests – Triage/Prioritization Process 12
Questions / Discussion / Feedback
[email protected] or (734) 677-7777