project ramp way

Upload: seventhhemanth

Post on 03-Apr-2018

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/28/2019 Project Ramp Way

    1/30

    Project Rampway

    ME 450 Finite Element Analysis Spring 07Aaron Emmons, Bryce Young and Eric BushProfessor Dr. K. Nema

    Monday April 30 th , 2007

  • 7/28/2019 Project Ramp Way

    2/30

    Presentation Summary Eric Objective Introduction Theoretical Concepts Model Details / Material Properties / Cost

    Aaron Loading Cases Results and Discussion

    Bryce Finish Results and Discussion Impact Statement Present Conclusions

  • 7/28/2019 Project Ramp Way

    3/30

    Objectives Utilize knowledge learned through Mechanical

    Engineering to obtain experimental results on a real-world example

    Examine two different materials to optimize a motorcycleramp for structural integrity and usability

    Accomplished by structural Finite Element Analysis of both aluminum and steel ramps through Pro/E and Pro/EMechanica

  • 7/28/2019 Project Ramp Way

    4/30

  • 7/28/2019 Project Ramp Way

    5/30

    Theoretical Background

    Von Mises Stress in 3 dimensions:

    Displacement in terms of Cartesian components:

  • 7/28/2019 Project Ramp Way

    6/30

    Theoretical Background Cont.

    Relation between Von Mises, Yield Strength, and factor of safety:

    Factor of Safety:

    safetyof factor Stress Maximum

    Material of StressYield _ _ _

    _ _ _

  • 7/28/2019 Project Ramp Way

    7/30

    Model Details

    Table 1: Ramp Dimensions

    Ramp Dimensions

    Dimension metric SI Length 2.2350m 7.33ft

    Width 0.3048m 1.00ftTop Surface

    Area 0.3786m^2 4.075ft^2Volume 0.009m^3 0.318ft^3

  • 7/28/2019 Project Ramp Way

    8/30

    Model Details II

    Table 2: Material Properties

    Material Properties (3)

    property Steel Aluminum unit

    E 200 72.4 Gpa

    p 7861.1 2795 kg/m^3

    poison ratio 0.29 0.33yield strength 434 414 Mpaultimate yield

    strength 703 469 Mpa

  • 7/28/2019 Project Ramp Way

    9/30

    Model Details III Table 3: Steel vs. Aluminum Properties

    MaterialWeight

    (kg)Weight

    (lb)Cost($/lb)

    Raw MaterialCost ($)

    Aluminum 25.06 55.21 17.50 966.15

    Steel 70.48 155.28 7.77 1206.51

  • 7/28/2019 Project Ramp Way

    10/30

    Model Details IV

    Mesh

    Automatically generated by Pro-Mechanica at 1300elements

    Multi-pass adaptive solution

  • 7/28/2019 Project Ramp Way

    11/30

    Model Loading Uniform Pressure Load, Central Localized Load and Off-

    centered Localized Load Ramp is fixed for zero displacement at the base as well

    as the top angled flange to simulate ground and truckbed loading conditions

  • 7/28/2019 Project Ramp Way

    12/30

    Loading Conditions Uniform Pressure Load used to establish initial

    maximum load and force per unit area

    Central Localized Load set at approximately 60 inches(average wheel base of motorcycle) to simulatemotorcycle tires

    Off-Center Localized Load real world condition of loading motorcycle up ramp under the assumption tireswill not follow center of ramp

  • 7/28/2019 Project Ramp Way

    13/30

  • 7/28/2019 Project Ramp Way

    14/30

  • 7/28/2019 Project Ramp Way

    15/30

    Uniform Pressure LoadSteel Von Mises Stress Analysis (Load = 17500 N/m^2)

  • 7/28/2019 Project Ramp Way

    16/30

    Uniform Pressure Load Aluminum Displacement (Load = 16000 N/m^2)

  • 7/28/2019 Project Ramp Way

    17/30

    Uniform Pressure Load

    Steel Displacement (Load = 17500 N/m^2)

  • 7/28/2019 Project Ramp Way

    18/30

  • 7/28/2019 Project Ramp Way

    19/30

    Central Localized Load Von Mises Stress Analysis (Load = 4479 N)

    Aluminum Steel

  • 7/28/2019 Project Ramp Way

    20/30

    Central Localized Load Displacement (Load = 4479 N)

    Aluminum Steel

  • 7/28/2019 Project Ramp Way

    21/30

    Results of Central Localized Load

    Aluminum

    Steel

    N Load (N/m^2)

    Max Max Yield Factor

    Displacement (m) Stress Stress (MPa) of Safety

    (MPa)

    4479 13000 0.00966 129.3 414 3.2

    N Load (N/m^2)

    Max Max Yield Factor

    Displacement (m) Stress Stress (MPa) of Safety

    (MPa)

    4479 13000 0.003515 130.4 434 3.33

  • 7/28/2019 Project Ramp Way

    22/30

    Off-Center Localized Load Von Mises Stress Analysis (Load = 4479 N)

    Aluminum Steel

  • 7/28/2019 Project Ramp Way

    23/30

    Off-Center Localized Load Displacement (Load = 4479 N)

    Aluminum Steel

  • 7/28/2019 Project Ramp Way

    24/30

    Off-Center Localized Load Bending due to off-center loading

  • 7/28/2019 Project Ramp Way

    25/30

    Results of Off-Center Localized Load

    Aluminum

    Steel

    N Load (N/m^2)

    Max Max Yield Factor

    Displacement (m) Stress Stress (MPa) of Safety

    (MPa)

    4479 13000 0.00995 141.3 414 2.93

    N Load (N/m^2)

    Max Max Yield Factor

    Displacement (m) Stress Stress (MPa) of Safety

    (MPa)

    4479 13000 0.00362 142.2 434 3.05

  • 7/28/2019 Project Ramp Way

    26/30

    Impact Statement This project is simulates a material selection and design

    validation process that a manufacturer would use inchoosing a material and verifying the functional limits of a design prior to production.

    An FEA analysis aids in producing a product thatperforms as advertised, which allows the production asafe and cost effective design that fulfills the needs of

    consumers.

    Due to familiarity, Pro/E Mechanica was used to as theFEA software to perform the described analysis.

  • 7/28/2019 Project Ramp Way

    27/30

    Conclusions The highest magnitude of stress occurred at the

    intersection of the angled flange

    The largest displacements occurred at the center of theramp.

    Cost - Aluminum cost less than steel by more than $240

    Weight Steel out weighs aluminum by more than 100lbs increasing the difficulties associated with normal useand transportation

  • 7/28/2019 Project Ramp Way

    28/30

    Conclusions Cont. Strength For the same design, steels structural

    properties are superior to aluminums allowing for higher load limits and smaller displacements under the loadconditions produce by a 1000lb motorcycle.

    Consider weight, cost, and loaded performance,aluminum proved to be the superior material for themotorcycle ramp.

    Aluminum motorcycle ramps are widely produced,indicating that manufacturers arrived at similar conclusions.

  • 7/28/2019 Project Ramp Way

    29/30

    References

    1. http://www.realclassic.co.uk/ridesfiles/rides05011401.jpg

    2. http://www.horizonsunlimited.com/newsletter/images2003/2003-04-01_Maarten-TwoWheeler.jpg

    3. ME450 Lecture Notes via Oncourse

    http://www.realclassic.co.uk/ridesfiles/rides05011401.jpghttp://www.realclassic.co.uk/ridesfiles/rides05011401.jpghttp://www.horizonsunlimited.com/newsletter/images2003/2003-04-01_Maarten-TwoWheeler.jpghttp://www.horizonsunlimited.com/newsletter/images2003/2003-04-01_Maarten-TwoWheeler.jpghttp://www.horizonsunlimited.com/newsletter/images2003/2003-04-01_Maarten-TwoWheeler.jpghttp://www.horizonsunlimited.com/newsletter/images2003/2003-04-01_Maarten-TwoWheeler.jpghttp://www.horizonsunlimited.com/newsletter/images2003/2003-04-01_Maarten-TwoWheeler.jpghttp://www.horizonsunlimited.com/newsletter/images2003/2003-04-01_Maarten-TwoWheeler.jpghttp://www.horizonsunlimited.com/newsletter/images2003/2003-04-01_Maarten-TwoWheeler.jpghttp://www.horizonsunlimited.com/newsletter/images2003/2003-04-01_Maarten-TwoWheeler.jpghttp://www.horizonsunlimited.com/newsletter/images2003/2003-04-01_Maarten-TwoWheeler.jpghttp://www.horizonsunlimited.com/newsletter/images2003/2003-04-01_Maarten-TwoWheeler.jpghttp://www.horizonsunlimited.com/newsletter/images2003/2003-04-01_Maarten-TwoWheeler.jpghttp://www.realclassic.co.uk/ridesfiles/rides05011401.jpghttp://www.realclassic.co.uk/ridesfiles/rides05011401.jpg
  • 7/28/2019 Project Ramp Way

    30/30

    Questions???