project overview (immersion call 1)
DESCRIPTION
Project overview (Immersion Call 1). Peter J. Pronovost MD, PhD. Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Quality and Safety Research Group. Immersion call Schedule. Learning Objectives. To delineate the goals of Cardiac Surgery CER Project To describe the project organization - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Peter J. Pronovost MD, PhD.Johns Hopkins University School of
MedicineQuality and Safety Research Group
Project overview (Immersion Call 1)
Immersion call ScheduleTitle Date /Time
13:00 ESTPresented by
Science Of Safety February 25, 2011 Jill Marsteller, PhD, MPP
Comprehensive Unit-Based Safety Program CUSP
March 4, 2011 Christine Goeschel MPA MPS ScD RN
Central Line Blood Stream Infection Elimination
March 11, 2011 David Thompson DNSC, MS
Surgical Site Infection Elimination March 18, 2011 Elizabeth Martinez, MD, MHS
Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia Reduction
March 25, 2011 Sean Berenholtz, MD
Hand-0ffs: Transitions in Care April 1, 2011 Ayse Gurses, PhD
Data we Can Count on April 8, 2011 Lisa Lubomski, PhD.
Team Building April 15, 2011 Jill Marsteller, PhD, MPP
Physician Engagement April 22, 2011 Peter Pronovost, MD, PhD
Learning ObjectivesLearning Objectives
• To delineate the goals of Cardiac Surgery CER Project
• To describe the project organization
• To define the interventions
• To outline the planned learning sessions
• To identify who to call for help
Project OrganizationProject Organization
Multi-site Project coordinated by Quality and Safety Research Group with collaboration from SCAF
Learning collaborative model (e.g., multisite participation, 2 face-to-face meetings, monthly calls)
Standardized data collection tools and evidence
Local unit modification of how to implement interventions
Improving Care
CUSP
1. Educate staff on science of safety
2. Identify defects
3. Assign executive to adopt unit
4. Learn from one defect per quarter
5. Implement teamwork tools
CLABSI
www.safercare.net
1. Remove Unnecessary Lines
2. Wash Hands Prior to Procedure
3. Use Maximal Barrier Precautions
4. Clean Skin with Chlorhexidine
5. Avoid Femoral Lines
7
Pronovost, Berenholtz, Needham BMJ 2008
Median and Mean CRBSI Rate
0123456789
Time (months)
CR
BS
I R
ate
Median CRBSI Rate Mean CRBSI Rate
CRBSI Rate Over Time
9
Impact of Statewide Quality Improvement Initiative on Hospital Mortality
Lipitz: BMJ 2011
Michigan ICU Safety ClimateImprovement
Effect of CUSP on Safety Climate
87
47
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Pre vs. Post Intervention
% "
Need
s I
mp
rovem
en
t" *
Pre-CUSP (2004) Post-CUSP (2006)
* “Needs Improvement” - Safety Climate Score <60%
11
On the CUSP: STOP BSI
Preliminary data
Lessons Learned
Technical WorkWork for which there is known scienceEvidence and Measures
Adaptive workWork for which there is no scienceRequires changes in values attitudes belief
Need to get both technical and adaptive work rightAdaptive work is usually why programs falter
14
Project GoalsPrimary Goal: Reduce mortality and length of stay of
cardiovascular surgical patients in a cohort of hospitals across the United States.
Secondary Goals:Reduce / Eliminate Surgical Site Infection rates Reduce / Eliminate Central line Infection rates to <1/1000
catheter days.Reduce / Eliminate Ventilator Associated Infection rates in
the ICU.Reduce handoff errors at patient transition pointsImplement a unit based safety program to address defects
at the local levelImprove patient safety culture in the CVOR, CVICU and
Inpatient floor
IMPROVE
CUSPComprehensive Unit based
Safety program
1. Educate staff on science of safety
2. Identify defects3. Assign executive to adopt
unit4. Learn from one defect per
quarter5. Implement teamwork tools
(TRiP) Translating Evidence Into Practice
1. Summarize the evidence in a checklist
2. Identify local barriers to implementation
3. Measure performance4. Ensure all patients get the
evidence
How Often Do we Harm?Are Patient Outcomes
Improving?
Measure
www.onthecuspstophai.org
Have We Created a Safe Culture?How Do We know We Learn
from Mistakes?
Ensure Patients Reliably Receive EvidenceEnsure Patients Reliably Receive Evidence
Senior TeamStaff
leaders leaders
Engage How does this make the world a better place?
Educate What do we need to do?
ExecuteWhat keeps me from doing it?How can we do it with my resources and culture?
Evaluate How do we know we improved safety?Pronovost: Health Services Research 2006
Major Intervention AreasCLABSIVAPSSICUSPCross-unit integration(For selected sites) Handoffs and
Transitions of care
Specific Aims AIM 1: To implement and evaluate the impact of a
patient safety program on surgical site infection (SSI) rates and operating room (OR) safety culture in a cohort of cardiac ORs.
AIM 2: To implement and evaluate the impact of a patient safety program on rates of central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI), ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), and safety culture in a cohort of cardiovascular surgical intensive care units (CVICUs)
AIM 3: To improve the safety of transitions of care/hand-offs from the cardiac OR to the cardiovascular ICU (CVICU), from the CVICU to the surgical inpatient floor, and from the surgical inpatient floor to hospital discharge.
AIM 4: To facilitate and improve teamwork, communication, and coordination across the three clinical areas/units.
IMPROVE
CUSPComprehensive Unit based
Safety program
1. Briefing/Debriefing2. Morning Huddle3. Learning from defect4. Hand-off tools 5. Shadowing another provider
AIMS
1. Surgical Site infection reduction2. Central Line Associated Blood
Stream Infections3. Improve unit culture4. Ensure all patients get the
evidence
How Often Do we Harm?Are Patient Outcomes
Improving?
OR Measures
Have We Created a Safe Culture?How Do We know We Learn
from Mistakes?
IMPROVE
CUSPComprehensive Unit based
Safety program
1. Daily Goals2. Conducting a Morning
Briefing3. Shadowing another provider4. Learning from defect5. Observing Rounds
AIMS
1. Surgical Site infection reduction continued
2. Central Line Associated Blood Stream Infections Reduction
3. Ventilator- Associated Pneumonia reduction
4. Improve unit culture5. Ensure all patients get the
evidence
How Often Do we Harm?Are Patient Outcomes
Improving?
ICU Measures
Have We Created a Safe Culture?How Do We know We Learn
from Mistakes?
IMPROVE
CUSPComprehensive Unit based
Safety program
1. Daily Goals2. Shadowing another provider3. Learning from defect4. Hand-off tools 5. Identifying who is on call
AIMS
1. Surgical Site infection reduction continued
2. Central Line Associated Blood Stream Infections continued
3. Improve transitions in care4. Improve unit culture5. Ensure all patients get the
evidence
How Often Do we Harm?Are Patient Outcomes
Improving?
CV Inpatient Floor Measures
Have We Created a Safe Culture?How Do We know We Learn
from Mistakes?
Action Items
• Send us key contact person and ID• Start to form interdisciplinary team in each area • eview content of website at www.safercare.net
• Toolkits• Slidesets• Manuals• Project Management Checklists
– Pre-Implementation Checklist– CEO/ Senior Leader Checklist– Infection Preventionist Checklist
To Get HelpTo Get Help
Email David Thompson DNSc, RN for study related questions. [email protected]
Talk to your team leader
ReferencesReferences
Measuring Safety
Pronovost PJ, Goeschel CA, Wachter RM. The wisdom and justice of not paying for "preventable complications". JAMA. 2008; 299(18):2197-2199.
Pronovost PJ, Miller MR, Wachter RM. Tracking progress in patient safety: An elusive target. JAMA. 2006; 296(6):696-699.
Pronovost PJ, Sexton JB, Pham JC, Goeschel CA, Winters BD, Miller MR. Measurement of quality and assurance of safety in the critically ill. Clin Chest Med. 2008; in press.
ReferencesReferences
Measuring Safety
• Pronovost PJ, Goeschel CA, Wachter RM. The wisdom and justice of not paying for "preventable complications". JAMA. 2008; 299(18):2197-2199.
• Pronovost PJ, Miller MR, Wachter RM. Tracking progress in patient safety: An elusive target. JAMA. 2006; 296(6):696-699.
• Pronovost PJ, Sexton JB, Pham JC, Goeschel CA, Winters BD, Miller MR. Measurement of quality and assurance of safety in the critically ill. Clin Chest Med. 2008; in press.
ReferencesReferences
• Pronovost P, Weast B, Rosenstein B, et al. Implementing and validating a comprehensive unit-based safety program. J Pat Safety. 2005; 1(1):33-40.
• Pronovost P, Berenholtz S, Dorman T, Lipsett PA, Simmonds T, Haraden C.
Improving communication in the ICU using daily goals. J Crit Care. 2003; 18(2):71-75.
• Pronovost PJ, Berenholtz SM, Needham DM. Translating evidence into practice: a model for large scale knowledge translation. BMJ. 2008 Oct 6;337.
• Pronovost PJ, Weast B, Bishop K, et al. Senior executive adopt-a-work unit: A model for safety improvement. Jt Comm J Qual Saf. 2004; 30(2):59-68.
• Thompson DA, Holzmueller CG, Cafeo CL, Sexton JB, Pronovost PJ. A morning briefing: Setting the stage for a clinically and operationally good day. Jt Comm J Qual and Saf. 2005; 31(8):476-479.