project credit: richard wynne - workflow and manuscript contributor role tagging
TRANSCRIPT
Workflow and Manuscript Contributor Role Tagging
Richard Wynne
VP Sales and Marketing
Aries Systems Corporation
Competing Interests
Funders and Institutions want:
• Structured Data• Accurate Data• Granular Data
Authors want:
• To focus on the research• Freedom to prepare the
manuscript however they want• Quick, easy submission with low
administrative overhead
Conflicting Messages
Funders and Institutions
“Why can’t publishers provide more, clean data?”
Authors
“Why do publishers keep asking us for all this stuff?”
Context:
• Publishers’ “value add” questioned• Downward pressure on APCs and subscription prices resulting in cost constraints• Assumptions about technology
Publishers
Peer Review Systems
Data Quantity – No End in Sight• Conflict of interest• Funding sources• Disclosures• Animal research • Statistical methods• Data sets• Ethics statements• Contributor ID (ORCID)• Institutional ID (e.g. Ringgold)• Credentials• Methodologies• Protocols• Authors and Co-contributors• Plagiarism checking• Identity validation• License data • Most of this has to be entered by humans in a timely manner
Data Structure
THE PAST: Flat, Static, Indexed, Data based on Single Primary Object (the Manuscript)
Manuscript
TitleAuthorsAbstract…etc.
THE FUTURE: Relational, Dynamic with Multiple Objects
ManuscriptFunder
Contributor Taxonomy
Institution
Contributors
Contributor TaxonomyCreating a Useful Solution
• Defining the taxonomy
• Integration with peer review systems
– Workflow questions
• Integration with production systems
• Integration with composition
• Integration with discovery tools
• Operating costs per manuscript
Workflow Models and Considerations
• Submitting author unilaterally assigns tags on behalf of all contributors:– Simplest front-end approach– Burden on submitting author– Downstream contention possible
• Tags assigned by submitting author and “confirmed” by contributors:– Highest fidelity
• Each contributor assigns their own tags– Shared burden– “Democratic”
• What point in the workflow? (Initial submission, Revision, Final acceptance). Mandatory or optional?
• Reporting, chasing, exception handling, output..• What article types? Different for different article types?
More Questions
• Are all Contributors “Authors” for publication workflow purposes? Implications? Confusing with acknowledgements, credits?
• Deceased Contributors?• Contributor conflicts• Cultural influences• Contributor groups• Corrections • Historical consistency (e.g. tag no longer used)
Summary
• Manuscript contributor tagging beneficial to the scholarly process, and to many consumers of scholarly manuscripts
• Technologically viable?
• Operationally viable?
• Economically viable? (Start up cost funding. Operating cost funding)