production of pure hydrogen from a source of waste and...
TRANSCRIPT
Production of Pure Hydrogen from a Source of Waste and Steam sing Solid O ide Membrane Electrol erand Steam using Solid Oxide Membrane Electrolyzer
Soobhankar PatiKyung Joong YoonSrikanth Gopalan
Uday B. Pal
Materials Science & EngineeringMaterials Science & Engineering
ECS ECS 215215thth Conference, San FranciscoConference, San FranciscoMay 24 May 24 ‐‐ 3030thth, 2009, 2009
OUTLINE OF THE PRESENTATION
Hydrogen as an energy carrier ?
Conventional Solid Oxide Steam Electrolyzers (SOSE)
Novel Solid Oxide Membrane (SOM) ElectrolyzerNovel Solid Oxide Membrane (SOM) Electrolyzer
Experiment
Process model for the SOM ElectrolyzerProcess model for the SOM Electrolyzer
Evaluation of experimentally obtained data using the process d lmodel
Some ongoing experiments to improve the efficiency
ELECTROLYSIS: CONVENTIONAL SOLID OXIDE STEAM ELECTROLYZER (SOSE)O2 (g)
2e-Air (O2 , N2)
Porous anode
O2‐ O + 2e‐
O + O O2(g)
V
Porous cathode
H2O(g) + 2e‐ H2(g) + O2‐
Electrolyte V
Porous cathode
H2O (g) H2 (g) 2e-
60 – 70% of the energy REDUCTANT
Natural gas*
Partial pressure of oxygen in air (pO2)air > Partial pressure of oxygen in H2-H2O (pO2)H2O/H2
= THERMODYNAMIC
BARRIERTHERMODYNAMIC
BARRIER
REDUCTANT AT THE ANODE Coal
Hydrocarbont
PROBLEM: Conventional SOSE is not equipped to use reductants (waste, coal, etc.)waste
*J. Martinez‐Frias, Ai‐Quoc Pham and S. M. Aceves: Int. J. of Hydrogen Energy, 2003, vol.28, pp 483‐90
Reductant (R)(Coal, Hydrocarbon waste)
RO(g)Syn gas
CONFIGURATION: SOLID OXIDE MEMBRANE (SOM)ELECTROLYZER
Liquid metal anode
2e-
[O] R RO( )
(Coal, Hydrocarbon waste) Syn‐gas
Liquid metal anode(Sn1, Ag2, Cu3)
ElectrolyteO2‐ [O]LMA + 2e‐
[O]LMA + R RO(g)
O2‐ V
H2O(g) + 2e‐ H2(g) + O2‐
Porous cathode(Ni‐YSZ, Cu‐YSZ)
(YSZ)
H2O(g)
2e-H2 (g)
LIQUID METAL ANODE
1 , 2 Charge transfer at the YSZ/Anode interface
3 Reaction interface for oxidation of reductant by the [O]LMAy [ ]LMA
1 T. Ramanarayanan and R.A. Rapp: Metall. Trans. B,3, 3239 (1972)2 T. H. Etsell and S. N. Flengas, Metall. Trans. B, 2, 2829 (1971)3 A. Krishnan, U. Pal and X. Lu: Metall. Trans. B, 36,463 (2005)
1.2
ADVANTAGES : SOLID OXIDE MEMBRANE (SOM) ELECTROLYZER
200
H O ( ) H ( ) 1/2 O ( )
SOSE
0 6
0.9
100
Go (k
J / m
ol) H2O (g) = H2(g) + 1/2 O2(g)
Operating 0.3
0.6Δ
Eo (V
olts
0
H2O (g) + C = H2(g) + CO (g)
ΔG Temperature
SOM
-0.3
0.0
s)
400 600 800 1000 1200-100
2 2
Temperature ( oC )
If h d b (HC) i d If hydrocarbon waste (HC) is used ,
H2O(g) + (HC) H2(g) + H2O(g) + CO(g)
‐ Electrochemical conversion of H2O(g) High purity H2
‐ Efficient way of converting energy value in waste
EXPERIMENTAL SET UP: ELECTROCHEMICAL PERFORMANCE
Ni-YSZ cathode S~ 90 m~ 10% porous
YSZ electrolyteYSZ electrolyte~ 2 mm
O ti T t 1000oCOperating Temperature : 1000oC
ELECTROCHEMICAL CHARACTERIZATION: OPEN CIRCUIT POTENTIAL
ELECTROCHEMICAL CHARACTERIZATION AND PERFORMANCE
Open circuit potential (Eeq)*,** :
ELECTROCHEMICAL CHARACTERIZATION: OPEN CIRCUIT POTENTIAL
Cathodic gas compositionpo
O2(a)
[C/CO(g) equilibrium]Measured Values
(V)
3 % H2O - H2
3.999 × 10-19
-0.050
10 % H2O - H2 - 0.120
20 % H2O - H2 -0.154
40 % H2O - H2 - 0.207
A negative open circuit potential (OCP) indicates the process is spontaneous
OCP of SOSE (0.89 V) >> OCP SOM electrolyzer (-0.207 V) : 40%H2O – H2
* J. Martinez‐Frias, Ai‐Quoc Pham and S. M. Aceves: Int. J. of Hydrogen Energy, 2003, vol.28, pp 483‐90.** P. Soral, U. Pal, H. Larson and B. Schroeder: Metall. Trans. B, 1999, vol.30, pp 307‐21.
ELECTROCHEMICAL CHARCTERIZATION: POTENTIODYNAMIC SCAN5
40% H2O 0 4
3
4
(A/c
m2 )
)
2 20% H2O 10% H2O 3% H2O 0.3
0.4
2
3
nt D
ensi
ty
Cur
rent
(A)
0.2
0
1
Cur
renC
0.1Mass transfer limited
-0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.50
Potential (V)
Current density increased with increase in steam content in the cathodic gas feed
Mass transfer limitation was observed only at 3% H2O content
~ Unavailability of H2O(g) at the TPBs
ELECTROCHEMICAL PERFORMANCE: POLARIZATION MODEL DEVELOPMENT
Open circuit potential (Eeq) :
Ohmic Polarization ( ohm) :ohm = i Rohm Rohm : YSZ , Electrodes, Contact, Lead wire
Activation Polarization ( act) : (ne=2, α=1/2)
(Anode + Cathode)(Anode + Cathode)
Concentration Polarization ( conc) :
Anodic concentration polarizationCathodic concentration polarization
ELECTROCHEMICAL PERFORMANCE: CURVE FITTING
Ohmic loss
Cathodic conc. polarization Anodic conc. polarizationActivation polarizationOpen CircuitPotential
Measured
Impedance
i0 : Fitting parameter
(Eff i bi diff i i )
kc (Mass transfer coeff.of dissolved oxygen
: Literature value*
Impedance spectroscopy (Effective binary diffusivity)
: Fitting parameter
ygin the liquid tin anode): Fitting parameter
Maximum of 2 fitting parameters used for the curve fitting Appropriate assumption
* T. Ramanarayanan and R.A. Rapp: Metall. Trans. B, 1972, vol.3, pp 3239‐46
ELECTROCHEMICAL PERFORMANCE: IMPEDANCE SPECTROSCOPYZreal(Ω-cm2)
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
1.2
1.64 X 10-2 Hz
3% H2O 10% H2O 20% H2O
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
16
0.8
1.2
1 Hz
Z imag
(Ω-c
m2 ) 40% H2O
- Zim
ag(Ω
)
8
12
0.0
0.4
4000 Hz
- Z
0
4
High frequency intercept : Ohmic resistance* : Independent of steam content**
0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0Zreal(Ω)
g q y p p
Overlap of charge transfer resistance and diffusional (Warburg) impedance at higherfrequencies ***
* J.R. Macdonald : Impedance Spectroscopy, John Wiley, New York,NY,1987** M. A. Laguna‐Bercero, S. J. Skinner and J. A. Kilner, J. of Power Sources, doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.12.139,(2009)*** S. Britten and U. Pal, Metall. and Mat. Transactions B, 31, 733 (2000)
ELECTROCHEMICAL PERFORMANCE: CURVE FITTING (40% H2O in cathodic gas)
h d lOh i l A di l i iA i i l i iO Cathodic conc. polarizationOhmic loss Anodic conc. polarizationActivation polarizationOpen
CircuitPotential
Measuredi0 : Fitting parameter
Insignificant kc: Fitting parameterMeasured
Measured (Imp. Spectra)
Insignificant kc: Fitting parameter
ASSUMPTION: Cathodic concentration polarization ( ) is negligible*3 0
3.5
ASSUMPTION: Cathodic concentration polarization ( conc, c ) is negligible
‐Mass transfer limitation not observed ‐ SOM electrolyzer is electrolyte supported with thin Ni‐ YSZ cathode 1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
ial (
V)
Fitting parameters Curve fitting results
Exchange current (i0 ) 1.00A
f ff ( k )0.0
0.5
1.0
Pote
nti
* M. Ni, M.K.H. Leung and D.Y.C. Leung: Int. J of Hyd. Energy, 2007, vol. 32, pp 2305‐13
Mass transfer coefficient ( kc) 0.00056 cm/sec0 1 2 3 4 5
-0.5
Current (A)
ELECTROCHEMICAL PERFORMANCE: CURVE FITTING (3% H2O in cathodic gas)
Activation polarizationOhmic lossOpen Cathodic conc polarization Anodic conc polarizationActivation polarizationCircuit
Potential
Cathodic conc. polarization Anodic conc. polarization
Measured i0 : Fitting parameterkc : Independent 0f cathodic gas comp.*
Measured (Imp. Spectra) : Fitting parameter
kc : 40 % curve fitting (0.00056 cm/sec
2.0 3% H2O
Curve Fitted
1.0
1.5
entia
l (V)
Fitting parameters Curve fitting results
Exchange current (i0 ) 0.12 A
Effective Binary Diffusivity ( DeffH2‐H2O ) 0.025 cm2/sec0.0
0.5Pote
*S. Yuan, K.C. Chou, U. Pal: J. Elec. Soc.,1994, vol. 141, pp. 467‐74
0.0 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.2 1.5 1.8
Current (A)
ELECTROCHEMICAL PERFORMANCE: CURVE FITTING ( 10 % and 20 % H2O)
Activation polarizationOhmic lossOpen
Circuit Cathodic conc. polarization Anodic conc. polarizationpCircuitPotential
p p
Measured i0 : Fitting parameterkc : 40 % curve fitting
(0.00056 cm/sec
3
10 % H2O
20 % H2O
Measured (Imp. Spectra)
:Independent of cathodic gas comp.*
:3% curve fitting (0.025 cm2/sec)
1
2 Curve Fitted
entia
l (V)
Cathode gas composition Exchange current (i )
0
Pote Cathode gas composition Exchange current (i0)
10 % H2O – H2 0.26 A
20 % H2O – H2 0.68 A
0 1 2 3 4
Current (A)R. B. Bird, W. E. Stewart and E. N. Lightfoot: Transport Phenomena, 2nd ed., John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2002
Cathode gas
ELECTROCHEMICAL PERFORMANCE : ACTIVATION POLARIZATION
g
compositionExchange current (i0)
3 % H2O – H2 0.12 A
10 % H2O – H2 0.26 A
20 % H2O – H2 0.68 A
40 % H2O – H2 1.00 A
0.4 3% H2O
H2O content
S f f H O ( ) TPB’ 0 2
0.3
0.4 10% H2O 20% H2O 40% H2O
ariz
atio
n (V
)
=> Surface coverage of H2O (g) at TPB’s
0.1
0.2
ctiv
atio
n po
la
Provides additional sites for the charge transfer reaction0 1 2 3 4 5
0.0Ac
Current (A)
ELECTRO. PERFORM.: CATHODIC CONC. POLARIZATION (40% H2O)
is composition independent
2 5
3.0
3.5 Total polarization Cathodic conentration polarization
Cathodic concentration polarization 1.5
2.0
2.5
rizat
ion
(V)
1% of the total overpotential0.0
0.5
1.0
Pola
r
0 1 2 3 4 5-0.5
Current (A)
Cathodic concentration polarization is insignificant at 40% H2O
: Consistent with our initial assumption
ELECTRO. PERFORM.: IMPEDANCE SPECTROSCOPY IN SUPPORT OF POLARIZATION MODELING
Zreal (Ω-cm2)
Cathodic gas composition 40 % H O-H
0 5 10 15 20 25 3020
Equivalent circuit describing the SOM electrolyzer Cathodic gas composition :40 % H2O
1.0
1.5
cm2 )
4.0 X 10-2 Hz
Ω)
Cathodic gas composition 40 % H2O H2
Curve fitted
CNLS Fitting Results: Rohm = 0.585 Ω
12
16
0.5
0
-Zim
ag(Ω
-c
4000 Hz10 Hz
-Zim
ag (Ω
1 Hz
ohm Rct = 0.061 Ω
4
8
0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5
0.0
Zreal (Ω)
0
At small activation polarization real ( )
At small activation polarization,
Polarization modeling CNLS Fitting
Oh i L (R ) 0 58Ω 0 585ΩOhmic Loss (Rohm) 0.58Ω 0.585Ω
Charge transfer resistance (Rct,c) 0.054Ω 0.061 Ω
40% Steam content 3% Steam content
ELECTROCHEMICAL PERFORMANCE: VARIOUS POLARIZATION LOSSES
2.5
3.0
3.5
on (V
)
Conc. polarization( Anode)Activation pol.
1.5
2.0
Conc. polarization(Anode)
n (V
)
1.0
1.5
2.0 Ohmic loss ( Electrode, Current collector)
Ohmic lossTota
l Pol
ariz
atio
0 5
1.0
Conc. polarization(Cathode)
tal P
olar
izat
ion
Ohmic loss (Electrodes,Contact, Current collector)
Activation polarization
0 1 2 3 4 50.0
0.5 Ohmic loss
( YSZ electrolyte)
T
Current (A)0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0
0.0
0.5
Ohmic (YSZ electrolyte)
Tot
Current (A)
)
Current (A)
At 40% H2O ohmic resistance is 80.5% of the total polarization
At 3% H2O the ohmic part ≈ Overpotential due to electrode processes
Current (A)
2 pElectrodes, Contacts, Current collector 52 % of the ohmic lossYSZ electrolyte resistance 48 % of the ohmic loss
Ohmic loss due to the dominates the performance loss:Ohmic loss due to the dominates the performance loss:
‐Molybdenum current collectors on the anodic side‐ SOM electrolyzer design ( Electrode supported)
SUMMARY
The potential of hydrogen production from steam using a solid oxide membrane l t l ith li id d d t t delectrolyzer with a liquid anode was demonstrated.
Thermodynamic barrier was lowered using a reductant in the liquid metal anode.
U i l t l t t d d i d l i l 2 0 V t d it f Using an electrolyte supported design and applying only 2.0 V , a current density of 0.5 A/cm2 was achieved.
Polarization modeling results thus showed that the performance is rate‐controlled byh h i l the ohmic loss.
Experimental study and modeling will form the basis for redesigning the SOMelectrolyzer to improve its efficiency and for investigating various types of waste feed.