problem 2 010

Upload: mgunsameth

Post on 04-Apr-2018

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/31/2019 Problem 2 010

    1/6

    COMPUTERS &

    STRUCTURES

    INC.

    R Software Verification

    PROGRAM NAME: SAP2000

    REVISION NO.: 0

    EXAMPLE 2-010 - 1

    EXAMPLE 2-010

    SHELL CYLINDER WITH INTERNAL PRESSURE

    PROBLEM DESCRIPTION

    In this example a cylinder is analyzed for an internal pressure load. The resulting

    radial outward displacement, vertical displacement at the top of the cylinder and

    11 stress are compared with hand calculated results based on formulas presentedin Roark and Young 1975.

    The cylinder is 200 inches tall and has a 60 inch radius. The wall thickness is 1inch.

    The applied load is a uniform radial pressure of 1 k/in2

    on the inside face of theentire cylinder.

    The local axes of all joints are oriented such that axis 1 points radially outward

    and axis 3 points upward. The joints at the base of the cylinder are restrained

    against translation in the local 2 and 3 directions. All other joints are restrained

    against translation in the local 2 direction.

    The local axes of all area objects (shells) are oriented such that axis 3 points

    radially outward and axis 2 points upward.

    Two different models are created for the analysis. The models are identical

    except for the shell element mesh. Model A uses an 8x16 mesh (height x

    circumference) and Model B used a 24x48 mesh.

  • 7/31/2019 Problem 2 010

    2/6

    COMPUTERS &

    STRUCTURES

    INC.

    R Software Verification

    PROGRAM NAME: SAP2000

    REVISION NO.: 0

    EXAMPLE 2-010 - 2

    GEOMETRY, PROPERTIES AND LOADING

    E = 29,000 k/in2

    = 0.3

    G= 11,154 k/in2

    Material Properties

    Shape of Cylinder

    height = 200 inradius = 60 inthickness = 1 in

    Loading

    Uniform radial pressureon inside of cylinderp = 1k/in2

    Base

    Top

    200"

    X

    Z

    Y

    3

    12

    Restraints

    Base joints: U2, U3All other joints: U2

    Typical area object local axesare oriented with axis 3pointing radially outward andaxis 2 pointing up

    1

    23

    Typical joint local axes areoriented with axis 1 pointradially outward and axis 3pointing up

    TECHNICAL FEATURES OF SAP2000 TESTED

    Three-dimensional analysis using shell elements

    Surface pressure load applied to shell elements Joint local axes

  • 7/31/2019 Problem 2 010

    3/6

    COMPUTERS &

    STRUCTURES

    INC.

    R Software Verification

    PROGRAM NAME: SAP2000

    REVISION NO.: 0

    EXAMPLE 2-010 - 3

    RESULTS COMPARISON

    The independent results are calculated using formulas presented in Item 1b in

    Table 29 on page 448 of Roark and Young 1975. The SAP2000 results arepresented separately for the thin plate option and the thick plate option.

    Thin Plate Option

    Output

    Parameter

    Modeland

    Mesh SAP2000 Independent

    Percent

    Difference

    A 8 x 16 0.12175 -1.9%U1 (at any jt)

    in B 24 x 48 0.123870.12414

    -0.2%

    A 8 x 16 -0.12175 -1.9%U3 (at top jt)

    in B 24 x 48 -0.12387-0.12414

    -0.2%

    A 8 x 16 58.85 -1.9%11 (anywhere)

    k/in2

    B 24 x 48 59.8760

    -0.2%

    Thick Plate Option

    OutputParameter

    Modeland

    Mesh SAP2000 IndependentPercent

    Difference

    A 8 x 16 0.12175 -1.9%U1 (at any jt)

    in B 24 x 48 0.123870.12414

    -0.2%

    A 8 x 16 -0.12175 -1.9%U3 (at top jt)in B 24 x 48 -0.12387

    -0.12414-0.2%

    A 8 x 16 58.85 -1.9%11 (anywhere)

    k/in2 B 24 x 48 59.8760

    -0.2%

  • 7/31/2019 Problem 2 010

    4/6

    COMPUTERS &

    STRUCTURES

    INC.

    R Software Verification

    PROGRAM NAME: SAP2000

    REVISION NO.: 0

    EXAMPLE 2-010 - 4

    COMPUTER FILES: Example 2-010a-thick, Example 2-010a-thin,Example 2-010b-thick, Example 2-010b-thin

    CONCLUSIONS

    The SAP2000 results show an acceptable comparison with the independentresults for both the thin plate and thick plate options. Increasing the meshing

    improves the comparison.

    The percentage difference for the 8x16 mesh is consistently 1.9% and for the

    24x48 mesh is consistently 0.2%. It can be shown that the difference between the

    SAP2000 results and the independent results is related to how well the SAP2000model approximates a true circular cylinder. For

    example, with an 8x16 mesh, a cross section

    through the cylinder is an octagon rather than atrue circle.

    Consider the sketch shown to the right that

    shows a plan view of a single shell element. The

    sketch shows the radius of the cylinder, R, and

    the distance from the center of the cylinder to theactual center of the shell element, a. The distance

    from the center of the cylinder to the theoreticalcenter of the shell element (located on the dashedcircular arc) is equal to the radius, R. Thus the

    percent error in the location of the center of the

    shell element can be determined from thefollowing equations.

    =

    =

    2cos60

    2cos

    Ra

    =

    =

    =2

    cos1100100*60

    2cos6060100*

    R

    aRerrorPercent

    The calculated percent error using the preceding formula for Models A and B isshown in the following table.

    a

    /2

    /2

    Plan View

    Theoretical shell elementlocation following circularcurve shown dashed

    Actual shell elementlocation shown solid

    Center ofcylinder

    R=60"

  • 7/31/2019 Problem 2 010

    5/6

    COMPUTERS &

    STRUCTURES

    INC.

    R Software Verification

    PROGRAM NAME: SAP2000

    REVISION NO.: 0

    EXAMPLE 2-010 - 5

    Model and Mesh (degrees) a (in) Percent Error

    A 8 x 16 22.5 22.5 1.9%

    B 24 x 48 7.5 7.5 0.2%

    The percent error shown for the location of the center of the shell element in the

    preceding table is the same as the percent error found in the analysis results.

  • 7/31/2019 Problem 2 010

    6/6

    COMPUTERS &

    STRUCTURES

    INC.

    R Software Verification

    PROGRAM NAME: SAP2000

    REVISION NO.: 0

    EXAMPLE 2-010 - 6

    HAND CALCULATION