principles of spe: troubleshooting techniques · –beginners guide to solid phase extractions...
TRANSCRIPT
©2013 Waters Corporation 1 JCA2013
Principles of SPE:
Troubleshooting Techniques
Using the Power of Chromatography to Solve Sample Preparation Challenges
Thank you for joining us! Our Webinar will begin shortly…
©2013 Waters Corporation 2 JCA2013
Introduction – Joe Arsenault
This webinar will be presented by Joseph Arsenault. With more than 37 years of chromatography experience at Waters, Joseph Arsenault was a part of the team that introduced Solid Phase Extraction (SPE) technology for analytical laboratories in 1978. He has been involved in all aspects of SPE products from manufacturing, quality control, quality assurance, having spent numerous years as a Product Manager for SPE products.
Over the last 14 years, he has devoted himself to the training and education of chromatographers around the world. In addition to his presentations, he has also authored and co-authored 3 handbooks/primers for chromatographers:
– Beginners Guide to Solid Phase Extractions (SPE)
– Beginners Guide to Liquid Chromatography
– Beginners Guide to Ultra Performance Liquid Chromatography (UPLC)
o All Available via www.Waters.com
©2013 Waters Corporation 3 JCA2013
Friendly Reminders…
Please use text chat functionality to submit questions during the
Webinar.
Upon conclusion, follow up information will be available:
http://www.waters.com/SPEpart2
Recorded version of today’s presentation
Copies of today’s slides
Product discount offers
Product specific information
Reference materials
©2013 Waters Corporation 4 JCA2013
1) Introduction to Solid Phase Extraction (SPE) Technology
2) SPE Troubleshooting Techniques 3) SPE Method Development Basics
Solid Phase Extraction (SPE) Educational Program Series
©2013 Waters Corporation 5 JCA2013
Companion Handbook -- “Beginner’s Guide to SPE”
Part #: 715003405
212 pages, paperback
Size: 8.5 x 11”
>150 Full Color Figures and Diagrams
Chapter Titles
— Benefits of SPE in Sample Preparation
— SPE is LC
— Key Terms and Calculations
— In the Lab
— Method Development
— Troubleshooting
— Appendix: Glossary of SPE and LC Terms
— Appendix: Oasis Sorbent Technology for SPE
— Appendix: Applications
— Appendix: Additional Reference Materials
Price: $99
©2013 Waters Corporation 6 JCA2013
Most Common Problem in SPE
Poor or Inconsistent
% Recovery Values
©2013 Waters Corporation 7 JCA2013
TOP “SPE Trouble SOURCES”
Flow Rate Control
De-wetting in Reversed Phase Devices
Cation Exchange with Silica Sorbents (D pH)
MS Matrix Effects
Lack of Breakthrough Study in Method
Development
Lack of Mass Balance Study in Method
Development
Most Common Problem in SPE: Poor or Inconsistent Recovery
BUT FIRST:
©2013 Waters Corporation 8 JCA2013
Common Problem -- POOR % RECOVERY
Root Causes
1) Variations in accurately determining the mass loaded
and mass recovered values, for example:
2) Calculation Method
3) Not knowing where your analyte is at each step
of the protocol
©2013 Waters Corporation 9 JCA2013
Solid-Phase Extraction (SPE) Recovery – Accurate Mass
Proper Load
Sample Analyte
Fully Retained
during Loading
Need to check
for no analyte
10 ng +/-
of
Blue Dye Recovery = 100%
Elution
Solvent
Load Elute Analyte is the Blue Dye
in the “Green” Sample
10 ng +/-
at
COMPLETION
Recovery % = 10 ng Recovered 10 ng Loaded
Wash Step
to Remove Yellow
©2013 Waters Corporation 10 JCA2013
Common Problem -- POOR % RECOVERY
Root Causes
1) Variations in accurately determining the mass Loaded
and mass recovered values, for example:
50% ?? 140% ?? Mass Recovered measured TOO Low Mass Recovered measured TOO High Mass Loaded measured TOO High Mass Loaded measured TOO Low
2) Calculation Method
3) Not knowing where your analyte is at each step
of the protocol
©2013 Waters Corporation 11 JCA2013
Common Problem -- POOR %RECOVERY
Root Causes
1) Variations in accurately determining the mass loaded and
mass recovered values, for example
50% ?? 140% ?? Mass Recovered measured TOO Low Mass Recovered measured TOO High
Mass Loaded measured TOO High Mass Loaded measured TOO Low
2) Suggested Calculation Method
3) Not knowing where your analyte is at each step
of the protocol
©2013 Waters Corporation 12 JCA2013
Run SPE Protocol
Proper Recovery Calculation Step One
©2013 Waters Corporation 13 JCA2013
Run SPE Protocol
Analytical Result = ?
Proper Recovery Calculation Step Two
©2013 Waters Corporation 14 JCA2013
Proper Recovery Calculation Perform Calculation
©2013 Waters Corporation 15 JCA2013
Proper Recovery Calculation Perform Calculation
©2013 Waters Corporation 16 JCA2013
Common Problem -- POOR %RECOVERY
Root Causes
1) Variations in accurately determining the mass
Loaded and mass recovered values, for example
50% ?? 140% ?? Mass Recovered measured TOO Low Mass Recovered measured TOO High
Mass Loaded measured TOO High Mass Loaded measured TOO Low
2) Calculation Method
3) Not knowing where your analyte is at each step of the protocol - several things to consider
©2013 Waters Corporation 17 JCA2013
Liquid is only able to
“Fit” in the Spaces
between the “Particles of
Ice” – this is called the
“Interstitial Volume”
For example, a full 12 oz.
glass of Ice Water may
contain only 6 oz. of
Liquid Water!
How Much Liquid is Contained
in this Glass of Ice Water?
©2013 Waters Corporation 18 JCA2013
Liquid is only able to
“Fit” in the Spaces
between the “Particles of
Ice” – this is called the
“Interstitial Volume”
For example, a full 12 oz.
glass of Ice Water may
contain only 6 oz. of
Liquid Water!
For SPE Devices, we
need to know what this
volume value is to
predict where an
analyte will be located –
this is called the
SPE Device
“Hold-UP Volume”
How Much Liquid is Contained
in this Glass of Ice Water?
©2013 Waters Corporation 19 JCA2013
Knowing Where Your Analyte “SHOULD BE” (Hold-Up Volume??)
Liquid HOLD-UP VOLUME of an SPE Device
©2013 Waters Corporation 20 JCA2013
When flow stops – how much liquid is still in the device? -- For example 1.2 mL
Value must be determined for each device design Carefully load a liquid onto the device and STOP FLOW - just as the FIRST DROP Elutes – Measure how much was added Upon subsequent liquid additions, this value can be used to predict where your analyte will be
Knowing Where Your Analyte “SHOULD BE” (Hold-Up Volume ??)
Liquid HOLD-UP VOLUME of an SPE Device
©2013 Waters Corporation 21 JCA2013
Load Analyte with a k = 0 Not Captured/No Retention
©2013 Waters Corporation 22 JCA2013
Note: Some of the Analyte is contained in BOTH
Vessels (Original Load, and Elution Steps)
Add Pure Sample Solvent (k = 0) GREATER THAN (>) Hold-up Volume
to flow ALL of the REMAINING ANALYTE out of the Cartridge
Loaded Analyte with a k = 0 Elution Step
©2013 Waters Corporation 23 JCA2013
Load Analyte with a k = 0 Not Captured/No Retention
©2013 Waters Corporation 24 JCA2013
Add Pure Sample Solvent (k = 0) with Volume
GREATER THAN (>) Hold-up Volume to flow ALL of the ANALYTE out
of the Cartridge
All of the Analyte Should be in JUST the
Elute Vessel
Loaded Analyte with a k = 0 Elution Step
©2013 Waters Corporation 25 JCA2013
Loaded Analyte with a k = 0 Elution Step
Add Pure Sample Solvent (k = 0) with Volume
LESS THAN (<) Hold-up Volume will elute SOME of the ANALYTE out of the
Cartridge
Some analyte is still in the cartridge!!
©2013 Waters Corporation 26 JCA2013
Sample Volume
Greater or Less Than
Hold-up Volume
Load Analyte with a k = HIGH Well Captured/High Retention
Analyte k = High for Good Capture -
analyte does not move too far down the bed
©2013 Waters Corporation 27 JCA2013
STRONG ELUTION SOLVENT (k = 0) with Volume
GREATER THAN (>) Hold-up Volume to flow ALL of the ANALYTE out of the
Cartridge
All of the Analyte Should be in JUST the Elution Vessel
Elution Solvent Initial Sample Volume Greater
or Less Than Hold-up Volume --
Now, Elution Solvent is Added
GREATER Than Hold-up
Volume
Loaded Analyte with k = HIGH Elution Step
©2013 Waters Corporation 28 JCA2013
Loaded Analyte with k = HIGH Elution Step
STRONG ELUTION SOLVENT (k = 0) with Volume
LESS THAN (<) Hold-up Volume only SOME of the ANALYTE will flow out
of the Cartridge
Initial Sample Volume
Greater or Less Than Hold-
up Volume --
Now, Elution Solvent is
Added LESS Than
Hold-up Volume
Only SOME of the Analyte will be in the ELUTION vessel
Elution Solvent
©2013 Waters Corporation 29 JCA2013
TOP “SPE Trouble SOURCES”
Flow Rate Control
De-wetting in Reversed Phase Devices
Cation Exchange with Silica Sorbents (D pH)
MS Matrix Effects
Lack of Breakthrough Study in Method
Development
Lack of Mass Balance Study in Method
Development
Most Common Problem in SPE: Poor or Inconsistent Recovery
©2013 Waters Corporation 30 JCA2013
SPE is Liquid Chromatography Same Rules Apply
©2013 Waters Corporation 31 JCA2013
van Deemter Curve and Plates vs. Flow Rate Curve
Optimal Linear Velocity corresponds to Optimal Flow Rate
(for maximum Plate Count – Resolution)
H
He
igh
t E
qu
iva
len
t to
Th
eo
reti
ca
l P
late
H
ET
P
Linear Velocity u {mm/sec}
u = L / t 0
HETP PLATES
Plates vs. Flow Rate
Separation Efficiency
1.0 2.0 3.0
Flow Rate {mL/min}
HETP vs. Linear Velocity
N
Optimal
Do Not
Flow Too
Fast
©2013 Waters Corporation 32 JCA2013
van Deemter Curve and Plates vs. Flow Rate Curve
Optimal Linear Velocity corresponds to Optimal Flow Rate
(for maximum Plate Count – Resolution)
H
He
igh
t E
qu
iva
len
t to
Th
eo
reti
ca
l P
late
H
ET
P
Linear Velocity u {mm/sec}
u = L / t 0
HETP PLATES
Plates vs. Flow Rate
Separation Efficiency
1.0 2.0 3.0
Flow Rate {mL/min}
HETP vs. Linear Velocity
N
Optimal
Do Not Flow Too Fast
Loss of Plates
(Resolution)
©2013 Waters Corporation 33 JCA2013
SPE Steps Requiring FLOW RATE Control
©2013 Waters Corporation 34 JCA2013
Steps Requiring FLOW RATE Control
©2013 Waters Corporation 35 JCA2013
Steps Requiring FLOW RATE Control Load
©2013 Waters Corporation 36 JCA2013
Steps Requiring Proper FLOW RATE Control
©2013 Waters Corporation 37 JCA2013
TOP “SPE Trouble SOURCES”
Flow Rate Control
De-wetting in Reversed-Phase Devices
Cation Exchange with Silica Sorbents (D pH)
MS Matrix Effects
Lack of Breakthrough Study in Method
Development
Lack of Mass Balance Study in Method
Development
Most Common Problem in SPE: Poor or Inconsistent Recovery
©2013 Waters Corporation 38 JCA2013
TOP “SPE Trouble SOURCES”
Flow Rate Control
De-wetting in Reversed-Phase Devices
— C18 and C8 Silica Based
Cation Exchange with Silica Sorbents (D pH)
MS Matrix Effects
Lack of Breakthrough Study in Method
Development
Lack of Mass Balance Study in Method
Development
Most Common Problem in SPE: Poor or Inconsistent Recovery
©2013 Waters Corporation 39 JCA2013
Non- Polar
Likes Attract Likes
Polar…Polar
Non-Polar…Non-Polar
Opposites Repel Polar
(WATER) (C18 RP Sorbent)
(Vinegar) (Oil)
Polarity Retention Mechanism
©2013 Waters Corporation 40 JCA2013
Familiar Example Rain on Old Auto
©2013 Waters Corporation 41 JCA2013
Familiar Example Rain on Waxed Auto
©2013 Waters Corporation 42 JCA2013
Conditioning/Equilibration for “Wetting”
BEFORE the Sample is Loaded, use an Organic Solvent to “WET” the Sorbent Pores -- then Flush with Sample Solvent or Water to EQUILIBRATE the Sorbent
Required for Reversed-Phase Applications
Reversed-Phase - SPE Method – CRITICAL Steps
©2013 Waters Corporation 43 JCA2013
Proper Wetting Good Capture/Retention
Analyte
©2013 Waters Corporation 44 JCA2013
Proper Wetting Conditioning and Equilibration Steps
©2013 Waters Corporation 45 JCA2013
Proper Wetting Conditioning and Equilibration Steps
Remember, the Organic Solvent from the
Conditioning Step brings the Equilibration Water or
Sample Solvent into the Pores and is then Replaced
by the Water or Sample Solvent
©2013 Waters Corporation 46 JCA2013
Fully Wetted Sorbent Pore Proper Conditioning and Equilibration
©2013 Waters Corporation 47 JCA2013
Sorbent Pores must be properly wetted for this step in Reversed-phase methods
Loading Step -- When the Sample is Actually Applied to the SPE Device
Loading Step
©2013 Waters Corporation 48 JCA2013
Proper Wetting
Results in
Good Capture
Successful Loading Proper Wetting
©2013 Waters Corporation 49 JCA2013
De-Wetted Pores in Reversed-Phase No Analyte Retention (No Capture)
Analyte
©2013 Waters Corporation 50 JCA2013
Solid-Phase Extraction (SPE) Drying Out Effect on C18 Silica
Organic brings Water into Non-Polar Pores
Condition with Organic
Equilibrate with Water/
Sample Solvent
Wets the Pores
Analytes DO NOT Enter Pores and are NOT Retained – POOR RECOVERY!
No Organic in Pores means No Water gets into Pores
Vacuum can pull air into one or some of the cartridges, and Dries Out Organic in the Pores
Elute
LOAD
Wash
©2013 Waters Corporation 51 JCA2013
De-Wetted Pores in Reversed-Phase Poor Analyte Retention (No Capture)
Analyte
No Recovery Partial Recovery
Completely
Dried Out
Partially
Dried Out
100% Recovery
INCONSISTENT % Recovery Values (Calculated at the completion of the SPE Protocol)
©2013 Waters Corporation 52 JCA2013
Impact on %Recovery Due to Drying-Out Effect on Silica
(Minutes of Air Drawn into the Cartridge - Vacuum)
©2013 Waters Corporation 53 JCA2013
Impact on %Recovery Due to Drying-Out Effect on C18 Silica
No Recovery Partial Recovery
Completely Dried Out Partially Dried Out
100% Recovery
©2013 Waters Corporation 54 JCA2013
Greatly Improved % Recovery Values with Unique Polymeric Sorbent
©2013 Waters Corporation 55 JCA2013
% Recovery values calculated at the completion of the SPE Protocol
Oasis® Sorbents Prevent De-Wetting
100% Recovery
More Consistent % Recovery Values Oasis® Sorbents
©2013 Waters Corporation 56 JCA2013
TOP “SPE Trouble SOURCES”
Flow Rate Control
De-wetting in Reversed-Phase Devices
Cation Exchange with Silica Sorbents (D pH)
MS Matrix Effects
Lack of Breakthrough Study in Method
Development
Lack of Mass Balance Study in Method
Development
Most Common Problem in SPE: Poor or Inconsistent Recovery
©2013 Waters Corporation 57 JCA2013
+ Charged Base
- Charged Sorbent
Cation Exchange: Strong Capture for Charged Bases
©2013 Waters Corporation 58 JCA2013
Analyte Charge as a Function of pH
©2013 Waters Corporation 59 JCA2013
Analyte Charge as a Function of pH
©2013 Waters Corporation 60 JCA2013
C18 Silica
Sorbent Surface Charge as a Function of pH -- C18 Silica
©2013 Waters Corporation 61 JCA2013
Un-bonded Silica Gel Particle: Pore Surface - Silanol Group
Note:
Surface silanols “Acidic sites” (Weak Acid)
Silanol Groups Si - OH
©2013 Waters Corporation 62 JCA2013
Un-bonded Silica Gel Particle: Pore Surface - Silanol Group
Note:
Surface silanols “Acidic sites” (Weak Acid) Uncharged at Low pH but
- Charged @
pH >5
Silanol Groups Si - OH
©2013 Waters Corporation 63 JCA2013
Silica Gel Surface Silanol Charge changes with mobile phase
pH
Behaves as a Weak Cation Exchanger
Sorbent Silanol Interactions Creating a Negative Charge
©2013 Waters Corporation 64 JCA2013
C18 Bonded and “Fully End-Capped” High Purity Silica Gel Pore
Remember:
~50% of surface
silanols remain
due to
“Steric Hindrance”
Note: Difficulty
bonding silanols
in micro-pores
Bonded and End-Capped Silica Based Sorbents can also
Become Negatively Charged at pH > ~5
©2013 Waters Corporation 65 JCA2013
Sorbent Surface Charge as a Function of pH C18 Silica
C18 Silica
Un-Anticipated Cation Exchange
pH > 5
©2013 Waters Corporation 66 JCA2013
SAME COLUMN
Hydrophobic Interaction with Bonded Phase
O- Si O- Si OH O- Si O- Si OH
O- Si OH O- Si O- Si O- Si OH
O- Si O- Si
(CH 3 ) 2
HN +
Mobile
Phase
pH < 3
Si - OH
N
Substrate Protonated No Charge
Base +
SAME C18 Silica SPE
Different pH
Mixed-Mode Retention SPE Cartridges C18 - Silica
©2013 Waters Corporation 67 JCA2013
SAME COLUMN
Mobile
Phase
pH > 5
Si – O -
Hydrophobic Interaction with Bonded Phase
Ion exchange Interaction with Charged Sites High Silanol Activity,
and Reversed-phase
O- Si O- Si O - O- Si O- Si O
-
O- Si O - O- Si O- Si O- Si O - O-- Si
O- Si
O- Si O- Si OH O- Si O- Si OH
O- Si OH O- Si O- Si O- Si OH
O- Si O- Si
(CH 3
) 2
HN + (CH 3 ) 2
HN + Mobile
Phase
pH < 3
Si - OH
N
Substrate
Protonated
no charge
Substrate De-protonated-
Negative Charge
Base + Base
RP Cation EX
SAME C18 Silica SPE
Different pH
Hard to Elute
Base—
Causing
Low
Recovery
in SPE
Mixed-Mode Retention SPE Cartridges C18 - Silica
B + --- ---
©2013 Waters Corporation 68 JCA2013
Even High Organic Will NOT Elute
the Positively Charged Basic Analyte
During the SPE Protocol Load or Wash Steps, if the pH approaches 5-7
(pH Water = 7)
It is Not where you think it should be!!!
Particle becomes
Negatively Charged
Resulting in Very Poor Recovery
Elution Step for Base Using 100% MeOH
Cation Exchange Potential – C18 Silica Poor Recovery Charged Base
©2013 Waters Corporation 69 JCA2013
TOP “SPE Trouble SOURCES”
Flow Rate Control
De-wetting in Reversed Phase Devices
Cation Exchange with Silica Sorbents (D pH)
MS Matrix Effects
Lack of Breakthrough Study in Method
Development
Lack of Mass Balance Study in Method
Development
Most Common Problem in SPE: Poor or Inconsistent Recovery
©2013 Waters Corporation 70 JCA2013
MS Signal Suppression– Impact of the Sample Matrix
Standards in aqueous solution give acceptable response
©2013 Waters Corporation 71 JCA2013
Analytes in human plasma
with only Protein Precipitation (PPT) Analyte
Standards
in aqueous
solution
Analytes in human
plasma with only
Protein
Precipitation
Signal Suppression -- What can happen to Analytes in a Complex Sample Matrix
©2013 Waters Corporation 72 JCA2013
Different Sample Preparation Techniques- Different Results
©2006 Waters Corporation
80% ion suppression
Minimal ion suppression
0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00
%
0
100
0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00
%
0
100 MRM
472.2 > 436.4 1.27e6
1.89
MRM 472.2 > 436.4
1.27e6 1.91
SPE with
Oasis ® MCX
Protein Precipitation
(PPT)
Note: These samples are dried and reconstituted.
MRM for Terfenadine
Significant ion suppression observed for analytes that co-elute with
residual matrix components using just PPT.
Gradient time = 1.5 min
©2013 Waters Corporation 73 JCA2013
Different Sample Preparation Techniques, Different Results
©2006 Waters Corporation
0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00
%
0
100
0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00
%
0
100
MRM 472.2 > 436.4
1.27e6
1.89
MRM 472.2 > 436.4
1.27e6
1.91
80% Ion Suppression
Minimal Ion Suppression SPE
(Oasis® MCX)
PPT
Note: These samples are dried and reconstituted.
Gradient
time =
1.5 min
No loss in signal observed for analytes when the interferences, which cause the
suppression, are removed by mixed-mode SPE.
MRM for Terfenadine
©2013 Waters Corporation 74 JCA2013
Run SPE
Protocol
Matrix Effect Calculation Step One
©2013 Waters Corporation 75 JCA2013
Matrix Effect Calculation Step Two
©2013 Waters Corporation 76 JCA2013
Matrix Effect Calculation
©2013 Waters Corporation 77 JCA2013
MS Result = 10 ng/mL
MS Result = 10 ng/mL
Matrix Effect Calculation -- No Matrix Effect
©2013 Waters Corporation 78 JCA2013
MS Result = 10 ng/mL
MS Result = 2 ng/mL
Matrix Effect Calculation – Suppression
©2013 Waters Corporation 79 JCA2013
10ng/mL MS Result = 12 ng/mL
MS Result = 10 ng/mL
Matrix Effect Calculation -- Enhancement
©2013 Waters Corporation 80 JCA2013
TOP “SPE Trouble SOURCES”
Flow Rate Control
De-wetting in Reversed Phase Devices
Cation Exchange with Silica Sorbents (D pH)
MS Matrix Effects
Lack of Breakthrough Study During
Method Development Work
Lack of Mass Balance Study During
Method Development Work
Most Common Problem in SPE: Poor or Inconsistent Recovery
©2013 Waters Corporation 81 JCA2013
Solid-Phase Extraction (SPE) Breakthrough/Loading Study
How Much Sample
can I Load
onto this Cartridge?
©2013 Waters Corporation 82 JCA2013
Solid-Phase Extraction (SPE)
Capacity Amount of Sample the SPE Device
can Effectively Handle, based on the
Chromatographic Conditions [~ f(k)]
Breakthrough When the Capacity of the SPE Device
is Exceeded for the Analyte(s) of
Interest (can’t capture all of the
analyte)
©2013 Waters Corporation 83 JCA2013
Solid-Phase Extraction (SPE)
Capacity Amount of Sample the SPE Device
can Effectively Handle, based on the
Chromatographic Conditions [~ f(k)]
Breakthrough When the Capacity of the SPE Device
is Exceeded for the Analyte(s) of
Interest (can’t capture all of the
analyte)
Remember – Other Sample Matrix components are
also being captured by the cartridge
©2013 Waters Corporation 84 JCA2013
Loading Determination – Answer Depends on Chromatography
Loading is a Function of;
How much Sorbent
Type of Sorbent
Chromatographic Conditions
^k of Analytes (Sorbents and Solvents)
^k of Interferences
^ Conditioning / Equillibration
Flow Rate
Variations in Sample Matrix (male vs. female, dog vs. human
Breakthrough Study must be
Performed to Develop a
Robust Method
©2013 Waters Corporation 85 JCA2013
Loading Determination
Breakthrough Study
•Series of Experiments – Passing Increasing Volumes of
Sample Matrix through separate SPE Devices [All the same
cartridge size / type] [Volumes bracketing Desired Volume]
•Follow your planned SPE Protocol
•Determine Analytical Results (% Recovery) for Analytes
•Plot Recovery Results for Analytes vs. Sample Volume
•Determine Maximum Volume for Each of the Analytes – find
Maximum Volume for Method
©2013 Waters Corporation 86 JCA2013
Breakthrough Study Loading Step
©2013 Waters Corporation 87 JCA2013
Breakthrough Study
Loading Step
©2013 Waters Corporation 88 JCA2013
Desired Method Goal: Load 2mL of Sample on Smallest Cartridge Possible
Breakthrough Study
Loading Step
©2013 Waters Corporation 89 JCA2013
Save these for future reference
Breakthrough Study
Loading Step
©2013 Waters Corporation 90 JCA2013
Analyze for Analytes, and Calculate %Recovery
Breakthrough Study
Complete SPE Protocol
©2013 Waters Corporation 91 JCA2013
Loading Determination
Breakthrough Study
•Series of Experiments – Passing Increasing Volumes of
Sample Matrix through separate SPE Devices [All the same
cartridge size / type] [Volumes bracketing Desired Volume]
•Follow your planned SPE Protocol
•Determine Analytical Results (% Recovery) for Analytes
•Plot Recovery Results for Analytes vs. Sample Volume
•Determine Maximum Volume for Each of the Analytes –
find Maximum Volume for Method
©2013 Waters Corporation 92 JCA2013
Loading Determination Plot %Recovery vs Load Volume
©2013 Waters Corporation 93 JCA2013
Loading Determination Plot %Recovery vs Load Volume
©2013 Waters Corporation 94 JCA2013
Breakthrough Study LOAD Step
©2013 Waters Corporation 95 JCA2013
0
2
Loading Determination Plot %Recovery vs Load Volume
©2013 Waters Corporation 96 JCA2013
Breakthrough Study LOAD Step
©2013 Waters Corporation 97 JCA2013
0
2
Loading Determination Plot %Recovery vs Load Volume
©2013 Waters Corporation 98 JCA2013
What is the Answer? How Much Can I Load?
If just Yellow?
If Just Blue?
If Both?
©2013 Waters Corporation 99 JCA2013
0
2
Breakthrough Study
Just Yellow
©2013 Waters Corporation 100 JCA2013
How Much Can I Load?
If just Yellow?
If Just Blue?
If Both?
©2013 Waters Corporation 101 JCA2013
0
2
Breakthrough Study
Just Blue
©2013 Waters Corporation 102 JCA2013
How Much Can I Load?
If just Yellow?
If Just Blue?
If Both?
©2013 Waters Corporation 103 JCA2013
0
2
Breakthrough Study
BOTH
©2013 Waters Corporation 104 JCA2013
What would you do if you still needed to process a 2mL sample for both yellow and blue??
Breakthrough Study
©2013 Waters Corporation 105 JCA2013
What would you do if you needed to process a 2mL sample for both yellow and blue??
You would need a Larger Cartridge with MORE of this Sorbent
or, A DIFFERENT Sorbent/Solvent System with
more capacity (k) for Yellow
Breakthrough Study
©2013 Waters Corporation 106 JCA2013
Very important in SPE Methods Development to insure the most efficient performance of the method
and its’ robustness
Breakthrough Study
©2013 Waters Corporation 107 JCA2013
TOP “SPE Trouble SOURCES”
Flow Rate Control
De-wetting in Reversed Phase Devices
Cation Exchange with Silica Sorbents (D pH)
MS Matrix Effects
Lack of Breakthrough Study in Method
Development
Lack of Mass Balance Study in Method
Development
Most Common Problem in SPE: Poor or Inconsistent Recovery
©2013 Waters Corporation 108 JCA2013
Root Causes
1) Variations in accurately determining the mass
Loaded and mass recovered values, for example
50% ?? 140% ?? Mass Recovered measured TOO Low Mass Recovered measured TOO High
Mass Loaded measured TOO High Mass Loaded measured TOO Low
2) Calculation Method
3) Not knowing where your analyte is at each step
of the protocol
©2013 Waters Corporation 109 JCA2013
Mass Balance Study Methods Development
Tracks where your analyte is at each step
of the SPE Protocol
You analyze for the presence/amount of the
analyte in what comes out of the device
during each step
©2013 Waters Corporation 110 JCA2013
Need to Know the Hold-Up Volume
©2013 Waters Corporation 111 JCA2013
Analyte is a
Purple Compound
Collect and test
for the presence,
and mass
of your analyte, at
each step
Collect and Test for How Much Analyte
©2013 Waters Corporation 112 JCA2013
Test that No Analyte has passed through
Strategy 1 Pass Through
©2013 Waters Corporation 113 JCA2013
Due Mass Balance How Much Loaded How Much Eluted Should Match
Strategy 1 Pass Through
©2013 Waters Corporation 114 JCA2013
Strategy 2 Capture, Wash, Elute
©2013 Waters Corporation 115 JCA2013
The Yellow
Interference
is Completely
Washed Away
Due Mass Balance for Yellow How Much Loaded How Much Eluted Should Match
Wash Step
©2013 Waters Corporation 116 JCA2013
The Yellow
Interference
is NOT completely
Washed Away
Incomplete Wash Step
Due Mass Balance for Yellow How Much Loaded How Much Eluted DO NOT Match
©2013 Waters Corporation 117 JCA2013
The Yellow
Interference
is NOT Completely
Washed Away
How to Fix 1) Wash with MORE Volume
of THIS solvent
2) Wash with SAME Volume
of a STRONGER Solvent
Incomplete Wash Step
©2013 Waters Corporation 118 JCA2013
Strategy 2 Capture, Wash, Elute
©2013 Waters Corporation 119 JCA2013
Incomplete Elute Step
Blue Analyte
is NOT Completely
Eluted
How to Fix 1) Elute with MORE Volume
of THIS solvent
2) Elute with SAME Volume
of a STRONGER Solvent
©2013 Waters Corporation 120 JCA2013
Check for Complete
Elution of Analyte
Stronger Solvent Requires LESS Volume than Weaker Solvent
©2013 Waters Corporation 121 JCA2013
Powerful technique Chromatographic principles Highly selective Very Robust when done properly Waters provides excellent Applications Support - Technical Support - Applications Library - Methods Development Information - Educational Seminars/Workshops - Literature
Solid Phase Extraction SPE Summary
©2013 Waters Corporation 122 JCA2013
Technology Capability Literature Primers
©2013 Waters Corporation 123 JCA2013
Thank You!
Questions?
Landing Page…
http://www.waters.com/SPEpart2
–30% Promotional Offer on SPE Products
–Free ‘Beginners Guide to SPE’ Text Book with
SPE Purchase
–PDF Slide Deck
–Full Webinar Recording of Today’s Session
–Compilation of Literature, White Papers, Brochures
General Questions – [email protected]