presentation downloadable from 1 implementing sustainability our slides are deliberately verbose as...

1Presentation downloadable from www.tececo.com

Implementing SustainabilityImplementing Sustainability

Our slides are deliberately verbose as most people download and view them from the net. Because of time constraints I will have to race over some slides John Harrison B.Sc. B.Ec. FCPA.

Presentation by John Harrison, managing director of TecEco and inventor of Tec and Eco-Cements and the CarbonSafe process.

TecEco are in the biggest business on the planet – that of solving global warming waste and water problems


The Problem. We have a Planet in CrisisThe Problem. We have a Planet in Crisis

– Fresh Water– Global

warming– Energy – Waste &

Pollution

In the next 50 years it is crunch time for:

Are you thinking about it? Do you have an answer?


Fresh WaterFresh Water

The amount of water in the world is finite. The number of us is growing quickly and our water use is growing more quickly.

A third of the world's population lives in water-stressed countries. By 2025, this is expected to rise to two-thirds.

The world's supply of fresh water is running out. Already one person in five has no access to safe drinking water.


Global WarmingGlobal Warming

Rises in the levels of carbon dioxide and other gases (methane, water vapour)

Are causing a rapid rise in temperature


The Carbon Cycle and EmissionsThe Carbon Cycle and Emissions

Source: David Schimel and Lisa Dilling, National Centre for Atmospheric Research 2003

Emissions from fossil fuels and cement production are the cause of the global warming problem


Energy CrisisEnergy Crisis

Peak Oil Production (Campell 2004)Most models of oil reserves, production and consumption show peak oil around 2010 (Campbell 2005) and serious undersupply and rapidly escalating prices by 2025. It follows that there will be economic mayhem unless the cement and concrete industry acts now to change the energy base of their products.


Waste & PollutionWaste & Pollution

Waste releases methane, can cause ill health in the area, leads to the contamination of land, underground water, streams and coastal waters (destroying our fisheries) and gives rise to various nuisances including increased traffic, noise, odours, smoke, dust, litter and pests.

Most damaging is the release of dangerous molecules to the global commonsThere are various estimates, but we produce about 5-

600 million tonnes of waste each year.


Ecological FootprintEcological Footprint

Our footprint is exceeding the capacity of the planet to support it. We are not longer sustainable as a species and must change our ways TO SURVIVE


All these Problems Represent an Opportunity to Do Something About Them

All these Problems Represent an Opportunity to Do Something About Them

The built environment is made of materials and is our footprint on earth.– It comprises buildings and infrastructure.

Construction materials comprise– 70% of materials flows (buildings, infrastructure etc.)– 40-50% of waste that goes to landfill (15 % of new materials

going to site are wasted.) Over 30 billion tonnes of building materials are

used annually on a world wide basis.– Mostly using virgin natural resources– Combined in such a manner they cannot easily be separated.– And include many toxic elements.

The single biggest materials flow (after water) is concrete at around 15 billion tonnes or > 2 tonnes per man, woman and child on the planet.


How? - The Techno-Processes & Earth SystemsHow? - The Techno-Processes & Earth Systems

Underlying the techno-process that describes and controls the flow of matter and energy are molecular stocks and flows. If out of tune with nature these moleconomic flows have detrimental affects on earth systems.

Detrimental affects on earth systems

Earth Systems

Atmospheric composition, climate, land cover, marine ecosystems, pollution, coastal zones, freshwater and salinity.

Move 500-600 billion

tonnes

Use some 50 billion

tonnes

To reduce the impact on earth systems new technical paradigms need to be invented that result in underlying molecular flows that mimic or at least do not interfere with natural flows.

Take

Waste


Under Materials Flows in the Techno-Processes are Molecular FlowsUnder Materials Flows in the Techno-Processes are Molecular Flows

Take → Manipulate → Make → Use → Waste [ ←Materials→ ]

[ ← Underlying molecular flow → ]

If the underlying molecular flows are “out of tune” with nature there is damage to the environment

e.g. heavy metals, cfc’s, c=halogen compounds and CO2

MoleconomicsIs the study of the form of atoms in molecules, their flow, interactions, balances, stocks and positions. What we take from the environment around us, how we manipulate and make materials out of what we take and what we waste result in underlying molecular flows that affect earth systems. These flows should mimic or minimally interfere with natural flows.


Detrimental Linkages

that affect earth system

flowsTake manipulate and make impacts

End of lifecycl

e impact

s

Greater Utility Less Utility

Materials are in the Techno-sphere

Utility zoneMaterials are everything between the take and waste and affect earth system flows.

There is no such place as “away”

There are Detrimental Affects Right Through the Techno-process

There are Detrimental Affects Right Through the Techno-process


We Must Learn from Nature (Biomimicry)We Must Learn from Nature (Biomimicry)

Nature is very efficient. The waste from one plant or animal is the food or home for another.

By studying Nature we learn who we are, what we are and how we are to be.” (Wright, F.L. 1957:269)

In nature photosynthesis balances respiration. We have nothing that balances our emissions in the techno-

process There is a strong need for similar efficiency and balance

By learning from Nature we can all live together


BiomimicryBiomimicry

The term biomimicry was popularised by the book of the same name written by Janine Benyus

Biomimicry is a method of solving problems that uses natural processes and systems as a source of knowledge and inspiration.

It involves nature as model, measure and mentor.

The theory behind biomimicry is that natural processes and systems have evolved over several billion years through a process of research and development commonly referred to as evolution. A reoccurring theme in natural systems is the cyclical flow of matter in such a way that there is no waste of matter or energy.

Nature is very economical about all Processes. We must also be MUCH more economical


Economically Driven SustainabilityEconomically Driven Sustainability

The challenge is to harness human behaviours which underlay economic supply and demand phenomena by changing the technical paradigm in favour of making carbon dioxide and other wastes resources for new materials with lower take and waste impacts and more energy efficient performance.

Sustainable processes are more efficient and therefore more economic. Natural ecosystems can be 100% efficient. What is needed are new technologies that allow material and energy flows to more closely mimic natural ecosystems.

Innovation will deliver these new technical paradigms.

$ - ECONOMICS - $

Sustainability will not happen by relying on people to do the right thing


Sustainability = Culture + TechnologySustainability = Culture + TechnologyIncrease in demand/price ratio for sustainability due to educationally induced cultural drift.

#

$

Demand

Supply

Increase in supply/price ratio for more sustainable products due to innovative paradigm shifts in technology.

Equilibrium shiftECONOMICS

Greater Value/for impact (Sustainability) and economic growth

One aspect of sustainability is that it is where Culture and Technology meet.

New Technical Paradigms are required that deliver sustainability.


Changing the Technology ParadigmChanging the Technology Paradigm

“By enabling us to make productive use of particular raw materials, technology determines what constitutes a physical resource1”

1.Pilzer, Paul Zane, Unlimited Wealth, The Theory and Practice of Economic Alchemy, Crown Publishers Inc. New York.1990

We need materials that require less energy to make them, that last much longer and that contribute properties that reduce lifetime energies. The key is to change the technology paradigm


Examples of Economic Changes in Technical Paradigms that result in Greater Sustainability

Examples of Economic Changes in Technical Paradigms that result in Greater Sustainability

Robotics - A Paradigm Shift in Technology that will fundamentally affect Building and Construction

Construction in the future will be largely done by robots because it will be more economic to do so. Like a color printer different materials will be required for different parts of structures, and wastes such as plastics will provide many of the properties required for the cementitious composites of the future used. A non-reactive binder such as TecEco tec-cements can supply the right rheology, and like a printer, very little will be wasted.

Light Globes - A Recent Paradigm Shift in Technology Reducing Energy Consumption

Light Globes in the last 10 years have evolved from consuming around 100 watts per 1700 lumens to less that 20 watts per 1700 lumens. As light globes account for around 30% of household energy this is as considerable saving.

100 watts1700 lumens

Incandescent

25 watts1700 lumens

Fluorescent

<20 watts1700 lumens

Led Light


The TecEco CarbonSafe Industrial EcologyThe TecEco CarbonSafe Industrial Ecology

OutputsGypsum, Sodium bicarbonate, Salts, Building materials, Potable water

InputsBrinesWaste AcidCO2

We must design whole new technical paradigms that reverse many of our problem molecular flows


A Low Energy Post – Carbon & Waste Age?A Low Energy Post – Carbon & Waste Age?

Prehistoric Classic Renaissance Industrial Revolution Contemporary Post Carbon & Waste Age

Recyclable Recyclable

CO2

Wattle & daub Stone Mud brick Etc.

Stone

Stone Brick

Concrete Eco-cements and other new technology paradigms

Waste

The construction industry can be uniquely responsible for helping achieve this transition

Maybe then we can move confidently into a more sustainable future.


Innovative New Materials - the Key to SustainabilityInnovative New Materials - the Key to Sustainability

Biosphere - Geosphere Techno - World

Materials are the substance of the techno-process, the link between the biosphere and techno-sphere and the key to sustainability. They are everything between and define the take and waste.

There is no such place as “away”, only a global commons

The choice of materials controls emissions, lifetime and embodied energies, user comfort, use of recycled wastes, durability, recyclability and the properties of wastes returned to the bio-geo-sphere.


Re - Engineering Materials – What we Build WithRe - Engineering Materials – What we Build With

To solve environmental problems we need to understand more about materials in relation to the environment. – the way their precursors are derived and

their degradation products re assimilated• and how we can reduce the impact of

these processes

– what energies drive the evolution, devolution and flow of materials

• and how we can reduce these energies

– how materials impact on lifetime energies With the knowledge gained re-

design materials to not only be more sustainable but more sustainable in use

Environmental problems are the result of inherently flawed materials, materials flows and energy systems


Changing the Techno-processChanging the Techno-process

Improving the sustainability of materials used to create the built environment will reduce the impact of the take and waste phases of the techno-process

ReduceRe-useRecycle

Recycle

Reuse

Take only renewables

Waste only what is biodegradable or can be re-assimilated

Manipulate Make Use

Reduce

Materials

Take => manipulate => make => use => wasteDriven by fossil fuel energy with detrimental effects on earth systems. Eco-innovate


Huge Potential for Sustainable MaterialsHuge Potential for Sustainable MaterialsReducing the impact of the take and waste

phases of the techno-process.– including carbon in materials

they are potentially carbon sinks.– including wastes for

physical properties aswell as chemical compositionthey become resources.

– re – engineeringmaterials toreduce the lifetimeenergy of buildings

C

C

C

C

C

Waste

Waste

Many wastes can contribute to physical properties reducing lifetime energies


Utilizing Carbon and Wastes (Biomimicry)Utilizing Carbon and Wastes (Biomimicry)

During earth's geological history large tonnages of carbon were put away as limestone and other carbonates and as coal and petroleum by the activity of plants and animals.

Sequestering carbon in magnesium binders and aggregates in the built environment mimics nature in that carbon is used in the homes or skeletal structures of most plants and animals.

We all use carbon and wastes to make our homes! “Biomimicry”

In eco-cement blocks and mortars the binder is carbonate and the aggregates are preferably wastes


Impact of the Largest Material Flow - Cement and ConcreteImpact of the Largest Material Flow - Cement and Concrete

Concrete made with cement is the most widely used material on Earth accounting for some 30% of all materials flows on the planet and 70% of all materials flows in the built environment.– Global Portland cement production is currently in the

order of 2 billion tonnes per annum. – Globally over 14 billion tonnes of concrete are poured

per year.– Over 2 tonnes per person per annum– Much more concrete is used than any other building

material.

TecEco Pty. Ltd. have benchmark technologies for improvement in sustainability and properties

TecEco Pty. Ltd. have benchmark technologies for improvement in sustainability and properties


Embodied Energy of Building MaterialsEmbodied Energy of Building Materials

Downloaded from www.dbce.csiro.au/ind-serv/brochures/embodied/embodied.htm (last accessed 07 March 2000)

Concrete is relatively environmentally friendly and has a relatively low embodied energy


Average Embodied Energy in BuildingsAverage Embodied Energy in Buildings

Downloaded from www.dbce.csiro.au/ind-serv/brochures/embodied/embodied.htm (last accessed 07 March 2000)

Because so much concrete is used there is a huge opportunity for sustainability by reducing the embodied energy, reducing the carbon debt (net emissions) and improving properties that reduce lifetime energies.

Most of the embodied energy in the built environment is in concrete.


Emissions from Cement ProductionEmissions from Cement Production

Chemical Release– The process of calcination involves driving off chemically bound

CO2 with heat.

CaCO3 →CaO + ↑CO2

Process Energy– Most energy is derived from fossil fuels.

– Fuel oil, coal and natural gas are directly or indirectly burned to produce the energy required releasing CO2.

The production of cement for concretes accounts for around 10% of global anthropogenic CO2.

– Pearce, F., "The Concrete Jungle Overheats", New Scientist, 19 July, No 2097, 1997 (page 14).

Arguments that we should reduce cement production relative to other building materials are nonsense because concrete is the most sustainable building material there is. The challenge is to make it more sustainable.

CO2

CO2

CO2

CO2


Cement Production ~= Carbon Dioxide EmissionsCement Production ~= Carbon Dioxide Emissions

0

500,000,000

1,000,000,000

1,500,000,000

2,000,000,000

2,500,000,000

Metric Tonnes

Year

Between tec, eco and enviro-cements TecEco can provide a viable much more sustainable alternative.


TecEco Technologies Take Concrete into the FutureTecEco Technologies Take Concrete into the Future

More rapid strength gain even with added pozzolans– More supplementary materials can be used reducing

costs and take and waste impacts. Higher strength/binder ratio Less cement can be used reducing costs and

take and waste impacts More durable concretes

– Reducing costs and take and waste impacts. Use of wastes Utilizing carbon dioxide

Magnesia component can be made using non fossil fuel energy and CO2 captured during production.

Eco-Cements

Tec -Cements

Tec & Eco-Cements


TecEco Binder SystemsTecEco Binder Systems

Hydration of the various components of Portland cement for strength.

SUSTAINABILITY

DURABILITY STRENGTHTECECO CEMENTS

Reaction of alkali with pozzolans (e.g. lime with fly ash.) for sustainability, durability and strength.

Hydration of magnesia => brucite for strength, workability, dimensional stability and durability. In Eco-cements carbonation of brucite => nesquehonite, lansfordite and an amorphous phase for sustainability.

PORTLAND POZZOLAN

REACTIVE MAGNESIA

TecEco concretes are a system of blending reactive magnesia, Portland cement and usually a pozzolan with other materials and are a key factor for sustainability.


TecEco FormulationsTecEco Formulations Tec-cements (5-15% MgO, 85-95% OPC)

– contain more Portland cement than reactive magnesia. Reactive magnesia hydrates in the same rate order as Portland cement forming Brucite which uses up water reducing the voids:paste ratio, increasing density and possibly raising the short term pH.

– Reactions with pozzolans are more affective. After all the Portlandite has been consumed Brucite controls the long term pH which is lower and due to it’s low solubility, mobility and reactivity results in greater durability.

– Other benefits include improvements in density, strength and rheology, reduced permeability and shrinkage and the use of a wider range of aggregates many of which are potentially wastes without reaction problems.

Eco-cements (15-95% MgO, 85-5% OPC)– contain more reactive magnesia than in tec-cements. Brucite in porous materials

carbonates forming stronger fibrous mineral carbonates and therefore presenting huge opportunities for waste utilisation and sequestration.

Enviro-cements (5-15% MgO, 85-95% OPC)– contain similar ratios of MgO and OPC to eco-cements but in non porous concretes brucite

does not carbonate readily.– Higher proportions of magnesia are most suited to toxic and hazardous waste

immobilisation and when durability is required. Strength is not developed quickly nor to the same extent.


Tec & Eco-Cement TheoryTec & Eco-Cement Theory

Many Engineering Issues are Actually Mineralogical Issues– Problems with Portland cement concretes are usually resolved

by the “band aid” engineering fixes. e.g.• Use of calcium nitrite, silanes, cathodic protection or stainless steel

to prevent corrosion.• Use of coatings to prevent carbonation.• Crack control joins to mitigate the affects of shrinkage cracking.• Plasticisers to improve workability.

– Portlandite and water are the weakness of concrete• TecEco remove Portlandite it and replacing it with magnesia which

hydrates to Brucite.• The hydration of magnesia consumes significant water


Tec & Eco-Cement TheoryTec & Eco-Cement Theory Portlandite (Ca(OH)2) is too soluble, mobile and reactive.

– It carbonates, reacts with Cl- and SO4- and being soluble can act

as an electrolyte. TecEco generally (but not always) remove Portlandite

using the pozzolanic reaction and TecEco add reactive magnesia

– which hydrates, consuming significant water and concentrating alkalis forming Brucite which is another alkali, but much less soluble, mobile or reactive than Portlandite.

In Eco-Cements brucite carbonates forming hydrated compounds with greater volume


Why Add Reactive Magnesia?Why Add Reactive Magnesia? To maintain the long term stability of CSH.

– Maintains alkalinity preventing the reduction in Ca/Si ratio. To remove water.

– Reactive magnesia consumes water as it hydrates to possibly hydrated forms of Brucite.

To raise the early Ph.– Increasing non hydraulic strength giving reactions

To reduce shrinkage.– The consequences of putting brucite through the matrix of a concrete

in the first place need to be considered. To make concretes more durable Because significant quantities of carbonates are

produced in porous substrates which are affective binders.

Reactive MgO is a new tool to be understood with profound affects on most properties


Strength with Blend & PorosityStrength with Blend & Porosity

0

50

100

150

100-150

50-100

0-50

High OPC High Magnesia

High Porosity

STRENGTH ON ARBITARY SCALE 1-100

Tec-cement concretes

Eco-cement concretes

Enviro-cement concretes


TecEco Technology in PracticeTecEco Technology in Practice

On 17th March 2005 TecEco poured the first commercial slab in the world using tec-cement concrete with the assistance of one of the larger cement and pre-mix companies.

– The formulation strategy was to adjust a standard 20 MPa high fly ash (36%) mix from the company as a basis of comparison.

– Strength development, and in particular early strength development was good. Interestingly some 70 days later the slab is still gaining strength at the rate of about 5 MPa a month.

– Also noticeable was the fact that the concrete was not as "sticky" as it normally is with a fly ash mix and that it did not bleed quite as much.

– Shrinkage was low. 7 days - 133 micro strains, 14 days - 240 micro strains, 28 days - 316 micros strains and at 56 days - 470 microstrains.

Strength Development of Tec-Cement Concrete

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

0 5 10 15 20 25 30

Days w ater cured

Str

en

gth

, M

Pa

CompressiveStrength

=> Whittlesea, Vic. Australia



Allow many mega litres of good fresh water to become contaminated by the pollutants on our streets and pollute coastal waterways

Capture and cleanse the water for our use?

Or

=> Porous Pavement



First Eco-cement mud bricks and mortars in Australia

– Tested up twice as strong as the PC controls

– Mud brick addition rate 2.5%– Addition rate for mortars 1:8

not 1:3 because of molar ratio volume increase with MgO compared to lime.

=> Whittlesea, Vic. Australia


TecEco Technology in PracticeTecEco Technology in PracticeBy Taus Larsen, (Architect, Low Carbon Network Ltd.)The Low Carbon Network (www.lowcarbon.co.uk) was established to raise awareness of the links between buildings, the working and living patterns they create, and global warming and aims to initiate change through the application of innovative ideas and approaches to construction. England’s first Earthship is currently under construction in southern England outside Brighton at Stanmer Park and TecEco technologies have been used for the floors and some walling.

Earthships are exemplars of low-carbon design, construction and living and were invented and developed in the USA by Mike Reynolds over 20 years of practical building exploration. They are autonomous earth-sheltered buildings independent from mains electricity, water and waste systems and have little or no utility costs.

For information about the Earthship Brighton and other projects please go to the TecEco web site.

=> Earthship Brighton, UK



The Clifton Surf Life Saving Club was built by first pouring footings, On the footings block walls were erected and then at a later date concrete was laid in between.

As the ground underneath the footings was sandy, wet most of the time and full of salts it was a recipe for disaster.

Predictably the salty water rose up through the footings and then through the blocks and where the water evaporated there was strong efflorescence, pitting, loss of material and damage.

The TecEco solution was to make up a formulation of eco-cement mortar which we doctored with some special chemicals to prevent the rise of any more moisture and salt.

The solution worked well and appears to have stopped the problem.

=> Clifton Surf Life Saving Club



Mike Burdon, Builder and Plumber.

I work for a council interested in sutainability and have been involved with TecEco since around 2001 in a private capacity helping with large scale testing of TecEco tec-cements at our shack.

I am interested in the potentially superior strength development and sustainability aspects.

To date we have poured two slabs, footings, part of a launching ramp and some tilt up panels using formulations and materials supplied by John Harrison of TecEco. I believe that research into the new TecEco cements essential as overall I have found:

1. The rheological performance even without plasticizer was excellent. As testimony to this the contractors on the site commented on how easy the concrete was to place and finish.

2. We tested the TecEco formulations with a hired concrete pump and found it extremely easy to pump and place. Once in position it appeared to “gel up” quickly allowing stepping for a foundation to a brick wall.

3. Strength gain was more rapid than with Portland cement controls from the same premix plant and continued for longer.

4. The surfaces of the concrete appeared to be particularly hard and I put this down to the fact that much less bleeding was observed than would be expected with a Portland cement only formulation

=> Mike Burdon’s Murdunna Works



Tec-Cement concretes exhibit little or no shrinkage. At 10% substitution of MgO for PC the shrinkage is less than half normal. At 18% substitution with no added pozzolan there was no measurable shrinkage or expansion.

The above photo shows a tec-cement concrete topping coat (with no flyash) 20mm thick away from the door and 80 mm thick near the door. Note that there has been no tendency to push the tiles or shrink away from the borders as would normally be the case.

=> DJ Motors, Hobart



TecEco Tec and Eco-Cement blocks are now being made commercially in Tasmania and with freight equalization may be viable to ship to Victoria for your “green” project. Hopefully soon we will have a premix mortar available that uses eco-cement.

=> Island Block and Paver,Tasmania



BUILD LITE CELLULAR CONCRETE4 Rosebank Ave Clayton Sth MELBOURNE AUSTRALIA 3169PH 61 3 9547 0255 FX 61 3 9547 0266

Foamed TecEco cement concretes can be produced to about 30% weight reduction in concrete trucks using cellflow additive or to about 70% weight reduction using a foaming machine with mearlcrete additive (or equivalents)

=> Foamed Concretes


Tec & Eco Cement Foamed Concrete SlabsTec & Eco Cement Foamed Concrete Slabs

BUILD LITE CELLULAR CONCRETE4 Rosebank Ave Clayton Sth MELBOURNE AUSTRALIA 3169PH 61 3 9547 0255 FX 61 3 9547 0266

=> Foamed Concrete Slabs



Solutions in Steel

ABN 48 103 573 039

TEL: 61 7 3271 3900FAX: 61 7 3271 2701

80 Mica StreetCarole Park 4300

QueenslandAustralia

Imagine a conventional steel frame section with a foamed concrete panel built in adding to structural strength, providing insulation as well as the external cladding of a structure.

Rigid Steel Framing have developed just such a panel and have chosen to use TecEco cement technology for the strength, ease of use and finish.

Patents applied for by Rigid Steel Framing

Please direct commercial enquiries to Rigid Steel Framing at rigidsteel.com.au

=> Foamed Concretes Panels


Rear view of test panels showing tongue and groove and void for services.Interior plasterboard is fixed conventionally over gap for services.


=> Foamed Concretes Panels


Eco-CementsEco-Cements Eco-cements are similar but potentially superior to lime

mortars because:– The calcination phase of the magnesium thermodynamic cycle takes

place at a much lower temperature and is therefore more efficient.

– Magnesium minerals are generally more fibrous and acicular than calcium minerals and hence add microstructural strength.

Water forms part of the binder minerals that forming making the cement component go further. In terms of binder produced for starting material in cement, eco-cements are much more efficient.

Magnesium hydroxide in particular and to some extent the carbonates are less reactive and mobile and thus much more durable.


Eco-CementsEco-Cements Have high proportions of reactive magnesium oxide Carbonate like lime Generally used in a 1:5-1:12 paste basis because much more

carbonate “binder” is produced than with lime

MgO + H2O <=> Mg(OH)2

Mg(OH)2 + CO2 + H2O <=> MgCO3.3H2O

58.31 + 44.01 <=> 138.32 molar mass (at least!)24.29 + gas <=> 74.77 molar volumes (at least!)

307 % expansion (less water volume reduction) producing much more binder per mole of MgO than lime (around 8 times)

Carbonates tend to be fibrous adding significant micro structural strength compared to lime

Mostly CO2 and water

As Fred Pearce reported in New Scientist Magazine (Pearce, F., 2002), “There is a way to make our city streets as green as the Amazon rainforest”.


CO2 Abatement in Eco-CementsCO2 Abatement in Eco-Cements

Eco-cements in porous products absorb carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. Brucite carbonates forming lansfordite, nesquehonite and an amorphous phase, completing the thermodynamic cycle.

No Capture11.25% mass% reactive magnesia, 3.75 mass% Portland cement, 85 mass% aggregate.

Emissions.37 tonnes to the tonne. After carbonation. approximately .241 tonne to the tonne.

Portland Cements15 mass% Portland cement, 85 mass% aggregate

Emissions.32 tonnes to the tonne. After carbonation. Approximately .299 tonne to the tonne.

.299 > .241 >.140 >.113Bricks, blocks, pavers, mortars and pavement made using eco-cement, fly and bottom ash (with capture of CO2 during manufacture of reactive magnesia) have 2.65 times less emissions than if they were made with Portland cement.

Capture CO211.25% mass% reactive magnesia, 3.75 mass% Portland cement, 85 mass% aggregate.


Capture CO2. Fly and Bottom Ash11.25% mass% reactive magnesia, 3.75 mass% Portland cement, 85 mass% aggregate.


For 85 wt% Aggregates

15 wt% Cement

Greater Sustainability


Eco-Cement Strength DevelopmentEco-Cement Strength Development

Eco-cements gain early strength from the hydration of PC.

Later strength comes from the carbonation of brucite forming an amorphous phase, lansfordite and nesquehonite.

Strength gain in eco-cements is mainly microstructural because of– More ideal particle packing (Brucite particles at 4-5 micron are

under half the size of cement grains.)– The natural fibrous and acicular shape of magnesium carbonate

minerals which tend to lock together. More binder is formed than with calcium

– Total volumetric expansion from magnesium oxide to lansfordite is for example volume 811%.

Mg(OH)2 + CO2 MgCO3.5H2O

From air and water


Eco-Cement Strength Gain CurveEco-Cement Strength Gain Curve

Eco – Cement Concrete with 50% reactive magnesia

OPC Concrete

HYPOTHETICAL STRENGTH GAIN CURVE OVER TIME (Pozzolans added)

MPa

Log Days Plastic Stage

?

?

?

?

7 14 28 3

Eco-cement bricks, blocks, pavers and mortars etc. take a while to come to the same or greater strength than OPC formulations but are stronger than lime based formulations.


Chemistry of Eco-CementsChemistry of Eco-Cements

There are a number of carbonates of magnesium. The main ones appear to be an amorphous phase, lansfordite and nesquehonite.

The carbonation of magnesium hydroxide does not proceed as readily as that of calcium hydroxide. Gor Brucite to nesquehonite = - 38.73 kJ.mol-1 – Compare to Gor Portlandite to calcite = -64.62 kJ.mol-1

The dehydration of nesquehonite to form magnesite is not favoured by simple thermodynamics but may occur in the long term under the right conditions.

Gor nesquehonite to magnesite = 8.56 kJ.mol-1 – But kinetically driven by desiccation during drying.

Reactive magnesia can carbonate in dry conditions – so keep bags sealed!

For a full discussion of the thermodynamics see our technical documents.

TecEco technical documents on the web cover the important aspects of carbonation.


Eco-Cement ReactionsEco-Cement Reactions

Hardness: 2.5 - 3.0 2.5

Form: Massive-Sometimes Fibrous Often Fibrous Acicular - Needle-like crystals

Solubility (mol.L-1): .00015 .01 .013 (but less in acids)

Magnesia Brucite Amorphous Lansfordite

MgO + nH2O Mg(OH)2.nH2O + CO2 MgCO3.nH2O + MgCO3.5H2O + MgCO3.3H2O

In Eco - Cements

Hardness: 2.5 3.5

Form: Massive Massive or crystalline More acicular

Solubility (mol.L-1): .024 .00014

Portlandite Calcite

Ca(OH)2 + CO2 CaCO3

Compare to the Carbonation of Portlandite

Aragonite

Nesquehonite


Eco-Cement Micro-Structural StrengthEco-Cement Micro-Structural Strength

Elongated growths of lansfordite and nesquehonite near the surface, growing inwards over time and providing microstructural strength.

Portland clinker minerals (black). Hydration providing Imperfect structural framework.

Micro spaces filled with hydrating magnesia (→brucite) – acting as a “waterproof glue”

Flyash grains (red) reacting with lime producing more CSH and if alkaline enough conditions bonding through surface hydrolysis. Also acting as micro aggregates.

Mysterious amorphous phase?


CarbonationCarbonation

Eco-cement is based on blending reactive magnesium oxide with other hydraulic cements and then allowing the Brucite and Portlandite components to carbonate in porous materials such as concretes blocks and mortars.

– Magnesium is a small lightweight atom and the carbonates that form contain proportionally a lot of CO2 and water and are stronger because of superior microstructure.

The use of eco-cements for block manufacture, particularly in conjunction with the kiln also invented by TecEco (The Tec-Kiln) would result in sequestration on a massive scale.

As Fred Pearce reported in New Scientist Magazine (Pearce, F., 2002), “There is a way to make our city streets as green as the Amazon rainforest”.

Ancient and modern carbonating lime mortars are based on this principle


Aggregate Requirements for CarbonationAggregate Requirements for Carbonation

The requirements for totally hydraulic limes and all hydraulic concretes is to minimise the amount of water for hydraulic strength and maximise compaction and for this purpose aggregates that require grading and relatively fine rounded sands to minimise voids are required

For carbonating eco-cements and lime mortars on the on the hand the matrix must “breathe” i.e. they must be porous– requiring a coarse fraction to cause physical air voids and some vapour

permeability. Coarse fractions are required in the aggregates used!


CO2 Abatement in Eco-CementsCO2 Abatement in Eco-Cements

Eco-cements in porous products absorb carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. Brucite carbonates forming lansfordite, nesquehonite and an amorphous phase, completing the thermodynamic cycle.

No Capture11.25% mass% reactive magnesia, 3.75 mass% Portland cement, 85 mass% aggregate.


Portland Cements15 mass% Portland cement, 85 mass% aggregate


.299 > .241 >.140 >.113Bricks, blocks, pavers, mortars and pavement made using eco-cement, fly and bottom ash (with capture of CO2 during manufacture of reactive magnesia) have 2.65 times less emissions than if they were made with Portland cement.

Capture CO211.25% mass% reactive magnesia, 3.75 mass% Portland cement, 85 mass% aggregate.


Capture CO2. Fly and Bottom Ash11.25% mass% reactive magnesia, 3.75 mass% Portland cement, 85 mass% aggregate.


For 85 wt% Aggregates

15 wt% Cement

Greater Sustainability


TecEco Cement LCATecEco Cement LCA

TecEco Concretes will have a big role post Kyoto as they offer potential sequestration as well as waste utilisation

The TecEco LCA model is available for download under “tools” on the web site


Tec-Cement ReactionsTec-Cement Reactions

MgO + H2O => Mg(OH)2.nH2O - water consumption resulting in greater density and higher alkalinity.

Higher alkalinity => more reactions involving silica & alumina.

Mg(OH)2.nH2O => Mg(OH)2 + H2O – slow release water for more complete hydration of PC

MgO + Al + H2O => 3MgO.Al.6H2O ??? – equivalent to flash set??

MgO + SO4-- => various Mg oxy sulfates ?? –

yes but more likely ettringite reaction consumes SO4

-- first.

MgO + SiO2 => MSH ?? Yes but high alkalinity required. Strength??

We think the reactions are relatively independent of PC reactions


The Form of MgO Matters - Lattice Energy Destroys a Myth

The Form of MgO Matters - Lattice Energy Destroys a Myth

Magnesia, provided it is reactive rather than “dead burned” (or high density, crystalline periclase type), can be beneficially added to cements in excess of the amount of 5 mass% generally considered as the maximum allowable by standards prevalent in concrete dogma.– Reactive magnesia is essentially amorphous magnesia with low lattice

energy.– It is produced at low temperatures and finely ground, and– will completely hydrate in the same time order as the minerals contained

in most hydraulic cements. Dead burned magnesia and lime have high lattice energies

– Crystalline magnesium oxide or periclase has a calculated lattice energy of 3795 Kj mol-1 which must be overcome for it to go into solution or for reaction to occur.

– Dead burned magnesia is much less expansive than dead burned lime in a hydraulic binder (Ramachandran V. S., Concrete Science, Heydon & Son Ltd. 1981, p 358-360 )


More Rapid and Greater Strength DevelopmentHigher Strength Binder Ratio

More Rapid and Greater Strength DevelopmentHigher Strength Binder Ratio

Early strength gain with less cement and added pozzolans is of great economic and environmental importance as it will allow the use of more pozzolans.

Tec – Cement Concrete with 10% reactive magnesia

OPC Concrete

HYPOTHETICAL TEC-CEMENT STRENGTH GAIN CURVE MPa

Log Days Plastic Stage

? ?

?

?

7 14 28 3

Concretes are more often than not made to strength. The use of tec-cement results in

– 15-30% more strength or less binder for the same strength.– more rapid early strength development even with added

pozzolans.– Straight line strength development for a long time

We have observed this sort of curve in over 500 cubic meters of concrete now


Tec-Cement Strength DevelopmentTec-Cement Strength Development3 14.365 18.095 19.669 5.5163 16.968 19.44 20.196 6.6569 19.466 20.877 13.39 3.4179 24.248 24.408 15.39 4.4349 29.03 27.939 17.39 5.451

21 24.54 35.037 25.493 11.99221 28.403 36.323 28.723 13.93321 32.266 37.609 31.953 15.874

TEC-CEMENT COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24

CURING TIME (days)

ST

RE

NG

TH

( M

Pa

)

OPC(100%)

OPC(90%)+MgO(10%)

WHITTLESEA SLAB

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

0 5 10 15 20 25 30

Days water cured

Str

eng

th,

MP

a

CompressiveStrength

Graphs above by Oxford Uni Student are for standard 1PC:3 aggregate mixes, w/c = .5

WHITTLESEA SLAB (A modified 20 mpa mix)

PC = 180 Kg / m3MgO = 15 Kg / m3Flyash = 65 Kg / m3

0

20

40

60

17 30 56 89

Days

MP

a

Sample 1Sample 2

Rate of strength development is of great interest to engineers and constructors


Calorimetric Evidence of Faster Strength GainCalorimetric Evidence of Faster Strength Gain

HEAT OF HYDRATION

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

32

0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440

TIME (min)

TE

MP

.( C

)

OPC

OPC+PFA(10%)

OPC+MgO(10%)

OPC(80%)+PFA(10%)+MgO(10%)

Evolution of Less Heat

Faster Strength Development

Energy associated with complexing?


Reasons for Compressive Strength Development in Tec-Cements.Reasons for Compressive Strength Development in Tec-Cements.

Reactive magnesia requires considerable water to hydrate resulting in:– Denser, less permeable concrete. Self compaction?

– A significantly lower voids/paste ratio.

Higher early pH initiating more effective silicification reactions?– The Ca(OH)2 normally lost in bleed water is used internally for reaction with

pozzolans.

– Super saturation of alkalis caused by the removal of water?

Micro-structural strength due to particle packing (Magnesia particles at 4-5 micron are a little over ½ the size of cement grains.)

Formation of MgAl hydrates? Similar to flash set in concrete but slower??

Formation of MSH?? Slow release of water from hydrated Mg(OH)2.nH2O supplying

H2O for more complete hydration of C2S and C3S?Brucite gains weight in excess of the theoretical increase due to MgO conversion to Mg(OH)2 in samples cured at 98% RH.

Dr Luc Vandepierre, Cambridge University, 20 September, 2005.


Greater Tensile StrengthGreater Tensile Strength

MgO Changes Surface Charge as the Ph Rises. This could be one of the reasons for the greater tensile strength displayed during the early plastic phase of tec-cement concretes. The affect of additives is not yet known

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30

CURING TIME (days)

STR

EN

GTH

(MP

a)

OPC(100%)

OPC(90%)+ MgO(10%)

+

+

+

+

++

+

+

+

+

+++

++

+

+

+

+

+Mutual Repulsion

=>

+

+

+

+++

+

+

+

+

+

++

+-

-

-

-

--

-

Ph 12 ?

Cement

Cement

MgO Sand

Sand

MgO

Mutual Repulsion

Mutual Attraction


DurabilityDurability

Concretes are said to be less durable when they are physically or chemically compromised.

Physical factors can result in chemical reactions reducing durability– E.g. Cracking due to shrinkage can allow reactive gases and liquids to enter

the concrete

Chemical factors can result in physical outcomes reducing durability– E.g. Alkali silica reaction opening up cracks allowing other agents such as

sulfate and chloride in seawater to enter.

This presentation will describe benchmark improvements in durability as a result of using the new TecEco magnesia cement technologies


Crack CollageCrack Collage

TecEco technology can reduce if not solve problems of cracking:– Related to (shrinkage) through open system loss of water.

– As a result of volume change caused by delayed reactions

– As a result of corrosion.

– Related to autogenous shrinkage

Thermal

PlasticShrinkage

DryingShrinkage

Corrosion Related

Freeze Thaw D Cracks

StructuralSettlement Shrinkage

Photos from PCA and US Dept. Ag Websites

Autogenous or self-desiccation shrinkage(usually related to stoichiometric or chemical shrinkage)

Alkali aggregateReaction

EvaporativeCrazingShrinkage


Causes of Cracking in ConcreteCauses of Cracking in Concrete Cracking commonly occurs when the induced stress exceeds

the maximum tensile stress capacity of concrete and can be caused by many factors including restraint, extrinsic loads, lack of support, poor design, volume changes over time, temperature dependent volume change, corrosion or delayed reactions.

Causes of induced stresses include:– Restrained thermal, plastic, drying and stoichiometric shrinkage, corrosion

and delayed reaction strains.– Slab curling.– Loading on concrete structures.

Cracking is undesirable for many reasons– Visible cracking is unsightly– Cracking compromises durability because it allows entry of gases and ions

that react with Portlandite.– Cracking can compromise structural integrity, particularly if it accelerates

corrosion.


Graphic Illustration of CrackingGraphic Illustration of CrackingCombined Effect of Concrete Volume Change (Example Only)

-50

0

50

100

150

200

250

0 12 24 36 48 60 72 84 96 108

120

Time since Cast (Hrs)

Sh

rin

kag

e/(E

xpan

sio

n)

Mic

rost

rain

Max Tensile Strain

Temperature effect

Drying Shrinkage

Autogenous Shrinkage

Total Srain Induced

Total Strain Less Creep

After Tony Thomas (Boral Ltd.) (Thomas 2005)

Autogenous shrinkage has been used to refer to hydration shrinkage and is thus stoichiometric


Cracking due to Loss of WaterCracking due to Loss of Water

DryingShrinkage

PlasticShrinkage

Picture from: http://www.pavement.com/techserv/ACI-GlobalWarming.PDF

EvaporativeCrazingShrinkage

Settlement Shrinkage

We may not be able to prevent too much water being added to concrete by fools.TecEco approach the problem in a different way by providing for the internal removal/storage of water that can provide for more complete hydration of PC.

Brucite gains weight in excess of the theoretical increase due to MgO conversion to Mg(OH)2 in samples cured at 98% RH.

Dr Luc Vandepierre, Cambridge University, 20 September, 2005.

Bucket of Water

Fool


Solving Cracking due to Shrinkage from Loss of Water

Solving Cracking due to Shrinkage from Loss of Water

In the system water plus Portland cement powder plus aggregates shrinkage is in the order of .05 – 1.5 %.

Shrinkage causes cracking There are two main causes of Portland cements shrinking over

time.– Stoichiometric (chemical) shrinkage and

– Shrinkage through loss of water. The solution is to:

– Add minerals that compensate by stoichiometrically expanding and/or to– Use less water, internally hold water or prevent water loss.

TecEco tec-cements internally hold water and prevent water loss.

MgO (s) + H2O (l) ↔ Mg(OH)2.nH2O (s)


When magnesia hydrates it consumes 18 litres of water per mole of magnesia probably more depending on the value of n in the reaction below:

MgO (s) + H2O (l) ↔ Mg(OH)2.nH2O (s) The dimensional change in the system MgO + PC depends on:

– The ratio of MgO to PC– Whether water required for hydration of PC and MgO is coming from stoichiometric mix water

(i.e. the amount calculated as required), excess water (bleed or evaporative) or from outside the system.

– In practice tec-cement systems are more closed and thus dimensional change is more a function of the ratio of MgO to PC

As a result of preventing the loss of water by closing the system together with expansive stoichiometry of MgO reactions (see below).

MgO (s) + H2O (l) ↔ Mg(OH)2.nH2O (s)40.31 + 18.0 ↔ 58.3 molar mass (at least!)

11.2 + liquid ↔ 24.3 molar volumes (at least!) It is possible to significantly reduce if not prevent (drying, plastic,

evaporative and some settlement) shrinkage as a result of water losses from the system.

The molar volume (L.mol-1)is equal to the molar mass (g.mol-1) divided by the density (g.L-1).

Preventing Shrinkage through Loss of WaterPreventing Shrinkage through Loss of Water


Portland cements stoichiometrically require around 23 -27% water for hydration yet we add approximately 45 to 60% at cement batching plants to fluidise the mix sufficiently for placement.

If it were not for the enormous consumption of water by tri calcium aluminate as it hydrates forming ettringite in the presence of gypsum, concrete would remain as a weak mush and probably never set.

– 26 moles of water are consumed per mole of tri calcium aluminate to from a mole of solid ettringite. When the ettringite later reacts with remaining tri calcium aluminate to form monosulfoaluminate hydrate a further 4 moles of water are consumed.

The addition of reactive MgO achieves water removal internally in a closed system in a similar way.

Preventing Shrinkage through Loss of WaterPreventing Shrinkage through Loss of Water



Other Benefits of Preventing Shrinkage through Loss of Water

Other Benefits of Preventing Shrinkage through Loss of Water

Internal water consumption also results in:– Greater strength

• More complete hydration of PC .

• Reduced in situ voids:paste ratio

– Greater density• Increased durability

• Higher short term alkalinity

• More effective pozzolanic reactions.

More complete hydration of PC .– Small substitutions of PC by MgO result in water being trapped

inside concrete as Brucite and Brucite hydrates which can later self desiccate delivering water to hydration reactions of calcium silicates (Preventing so called “Autogenous” shrinkage).


Bleeding is a Bad ThingBleeding is a Bad Thing Bleeding is caused by:

– Lack of fines– Too much water

Bleeding can be fixed by:– Reducing water or adding fines– Air entrainment or grading adjustments

Bleeding causes:– Reduced pumpability– Loss of cement near the surface of concretes– Delays in finishing– Poor bond between layers of concrete– Interconnected pore structures that allow aggressive agents to enter later– Slump and plastic cracking due to loss of volume from the system– Loss of alkali that should remain in the system for better pozzolanic

reactions– Loss of pollutants such as heavy metals if wastes are being incorporated.

Concrete is better as a closed system

Better to keep concretes as closed systems


Dimensional Control in Tec-Cement Concretes over Time

Dimensional Control in Tec-Cement Concretes over Time

By adding MgO volume changes are minimised to close to neutral.– So far we have observed significantly less shrinkage in TecEco tec

- cement concretes with about (8-10% substitution OPC) with or without fly ash.

– At some ratio, thought to be around 15-18% reactive magnesia there is no shrinkage.

– The water lost by concrete as it shrinks is used by the reactive magnesia as it hydrates eliminating shrinkage.

Note that brucite is > 44.65 mass% water and it makes sense to make binders out of water!

More research is required to accurately establish volume relationships and causes for reduced shrinkage.


Long Term pH controlLong Term pH control TecEco add reactive magnesia which hydrates forming

brucite which is another alkali, but much less soluble, mobile or reactive than Portlandite.

Brucite provides long term pH control.

13.7

pH

Log Time

10.5

Tec – Cement Concrete with 10% reactive magnesia (red). Ph maintained by brucite

OPC Concrete

HYPOTHETICAL pH CURVES OVER TIME (with fly ash)

Plastic Stage

? ?

?

Tec-Cement (red) - more affective pozzolanic reactions

11.2

OPC Concrete – Lower long term pH due to consumption of lime and carbonation

Surface hydrolysis and more polymeric species? A pH in the range 10.5 – 11.2 is ideal in a concrete


Reducing Cracking as a Result of Volume Change caused by Delayed Reactions

Reducing Cracking as a Result of Volume Change caused by Delayed Reactions

Photo Courtesy Ahmad Shayan ARRBAn Alkali Aggregate Reaction Cracked Bridge Element


Types of Delayed ReactionsTypes of Delayed Reactions There are several types of delayed reactions

that cause volume changes (generally expansion) and cracking.– Alkali silica reactions– Alkali carbonate reactions– Delayed ettringite formation– Delayed thaumasite formation– Delayed hydration or dead burned lime or periclase.

Delayed reactions cause dimensional distress, cracking and possibly even failure.


Reducing Delayed ReactionsReducing Delayed Reactions

Delayed reactions do not appear to occur to the same extent in TecEco cements.– A lower long term pH results in reduced reactivity after the

plastic stage.– Potentially reactive ions are trapped in the structure of

brucite.– Ordinary Portland cement concretes can take years to dry

out however the reactive magnesia in Tec-cement concretes consumes unbound water from the pores inside concrete.

– Magnesia dries concrete out from the inside. Reactions do not occur without water.


Reduced Steel Corrosion Related CrackingReduced Steel Corrosion Related Cracking

Steel remains protected with a passive oxide coating of Fe3O4 above pH 8.9.

A pH of over 8.9 is maintained by the equilibrium Mg(OH)2 ↔ Mg++ + 2OH- for much longer than the pH maintained by Ca(OH)2 because:– Brucite does not react as readily as Portlandite resulting in

reduced carbonation rates and reactions with salts.

Concrete with brucite in it is denser and carbonation is expansive, sealing the surface preventing further access by moisture, CO2 and salts.

Rusting Causes Dimensional Distress


Reduced Steel CorrosionReduced Steel Corrosion

Brucite is less soluble and traps salts as it forms resulting in less ionic transport to complete a circuit for electrolysis and less corrosion.

Free chlorides and sulfates originally in cement and aggregates are bound by magnesium– Magnesium oxychlorides or oxysulfates are formed.

( Compatible phases in hydraulic binders that are stable provided the concrete is dense and water kept out.)

As a result of the above the rusting of reinforcement does not proceed to the same extent.

Cracking or spalling due to rust does not occur


Steel Corrosion is Influenced by Long Term pHSteel Corrosion is Influenced by Long Term pH

Eh-pH or Pourbaix Diagram The stability fields of hematite, magnetite and sideritein aqueous solution; total dissolved carbonate = 10-2M.

In TecEco cements the long term pH is governed by the low solubility and carbonation rate of brucite and is much lower at around 10.5 -11, allowing a wider range of aggregates to be used, reducing problems such as AAR and etching. The pH is still high enough to keep Fe3O4 stable in reducing conditions.

Steel corrodes below 8.9

Equilibrium pH of Brucite and of lime


Reducing Cracking Related to Autogenous ShrinkageReducing Cracking Related to Autogenous Shrinkage

Autogenous shrinkage tends to occur in high performance concretes in which dense microstructures develop quickly preventing the entry of additional water required to complete hydration.– First defined by Lynam in 1934 (Lynam CG. Growth and movement in

Portland cement concrete. London: Oxford University Press; 1934. p. 26-7.)

The autogenous deformation of concrete is defined as the unrestrained, bulk deformation that occurs when concrete is kept sealed and at a constant temperature.



Main cause is stoichiometric or chemical shrinkage as observed by Le Chatelier.– whereby the reaction products formed during the hydration of

cement occupy less space than the corresponding reactants.

A dense cement paste hydrating under sealed conditions will therefore self-desiccate creating empty pores within developing structure. If external water is not available to fill these “empty” pores, considerable shrinkage can result.

Le Chatelier H. Sur les changements de volume qui accompagnent Ie durcissement des ciments. Bulletin de la Societe d'Encouragement pour I'Industrie Nationale 1900:54-7.



Autogenous shrinkage does not occur in high strength tec-cement concretes because:– The brucite hydrates that form desiccate back to brucite delivering water in

situ for more complete hydration of Portland cement.

Mg(OH)2.nH2O (s) ↔ MgO (s) + H2O (l)• As brucite is a relatively weak mineral compressed and densifies the

microstructure.

– The stoichiometric shrinkage of Portland cement (first observed by Le Chatelier) is compensated for by the stoichiometric expansion of magnesium oxide on hydration.


40.31 + 18.0 ↔ 58.3 molar mass (at least!)

11.2 + liquid ↔ 24.3 molar volumes (at least 116% expansion, probably more initially before desiccation as above!)


Improved DurabilityImproved Durability

Materials that last longer need replacing less often saving on energy and resources. Reasons for Improved Durability:

– Greater Density = Lower Permeability• Physical Weaknesses => Chemical Attack

– Removal of Portlandite with the Pozzolanic Reaction.• Removal or reactive components

– Substitution by Brucite => Long Term pH control• Reducing corrosion


Reduced PermeabilityReduced Permeability

As bleed water exits ordinary Portland cement concretes it creates an interconnected pore structure that remains in concrete allowing the entry of aggressive agents such as SO4

--, Cl- and CO2

TecEco tec - cement concretes are a closed system. They do not bleed as excess water is consumed by the hydration of magnesia.

– As a result TecEco tec - cement concretes dry from within, are denser and less permeable and therefore stronger more durable and less permeable. Cement powder is not lost near the surfaces. Tec-cements have a higher salt resistance and less corrosion of steel etc.


Concretes have a high percentage (around 18% – 22%) of voids.

On hydration magnesia expands >=116.9 % filling voids and surrounding hydrating cement grains => denser concrete.

On carbonation to nesquehonite brucite expands 307% sealing the surface.

Lower voids:paste ratios than water:binder ratios result in little or no bleed water, lower permeability and greater density.

Greater Density – Lower PermeabilityGreater Density – Lower Permeability


Densification During the Plastic PhaseDensification During the Plastic Phase

Water is required to plasticise concrete for placement, however once placed, the less water over the amount required for hydration the better. Magnesia consumes water as it hydrates producing solid material.

Less water results in increased density and concentration of

alkalis - less shrinkage and cracking and improved strength and durability.

Water

Log time

Observable Characteristic

Relevant Fundamental

Voids

Binder + supplementary cementitious materials

Hydrated Binder Materials

High water for ease of placement

Less water for strength and durability

Variables such as % hydration of mineral, density, compaction, % mineral H20 etc.

Consumption of water during plastic stage

Unhydrated Binder


Brucite has always played a protective role during salt attack. Putting it in the matrix of concretes in the first place makes sense.

Brucite does not react with salts because it is a least 5 orders of magnitude less soluble, mobile or reactive. – Ksp brucite = 1.8 X 10-11

– Ksp Portlandite = 5.5 X 10-6

TecEco cements are more acid resistant than Portland cement– This is because of the relatively high acid resistance (?) of

Lansfordite and nesquehonite compared to calcite or aragonite

Durability - Reduced Salt & Acid AttackDurability - Reduced Salt & Acid Attack


Less Freeze - Thaw ProblemsLess Freeze - Thaw Problems Denser concretes do not let water in. Brucite will to a certain extent take up internal stresses When magnesia hydrates it expands into the pores left around

hydrating cement grains: MgO (s) + H2O (l) ↔ Mg(OH)2 (s)

40.31 + 18.0 ↔ 58.3 molar mass 11.2 + 18.0 ↔ 24.3 molar volumes

39.20 ↔ 24.3 molar volumesAt least 38% air voids are created in space that was occupied by

magnesia and water! Air entrainment can also be used as in conventional concretes TecEco concretes are not attacked by the salts used on roads


Rosendale Concretes – Proof of DurabilityRosendale Concretes – Proof of Durability

Rosendale cements contained 14 – 30% MgO A major structure built with Rosendale cements commenced in 1846 was Fort Jefferson

near key west in Florida. Rosendale cements were recognized for their exceptional durability, even under severe

exposure. At Fort Jefferson much of the 150 year-old Rosendale cement mortar remains in excellent condition, in spite of the severe ocean exposure and over 100 years of neglect. Fort Jefferson is nearly a half mile in circumference and has a total lack of expansion joints, yet shows no signs of cracking or stress. The first phase of a major restoration is currently in progress.

More information from http://www.rosendalecement.net/rosendale_natural_cement_.html


Solving Waste & Logistics ProblemsSolving Waste & Logistics Problems TecEco cementitious composites represent a cost affective

option for– using non traditional aggregates from on site reducing transports costs and

emissions– use and immobilisation of waste.

Because they have– lower reactivity

• less water• lower pH

– Reduced solubility of heavy metals• less mobile salts

– greater durability.• denser.• impermeable (tec-cements).• dimensionally more stable with less shrinkage and cracking.

– homogenous.– no bleed water.

TecEco Technology - Converting Waste to Resource


Role of Brucite in ImmobilizationRole of Brucite in Immobilization

In a Portland cement Brucite matrix– PC derive CSH takes up lead, some zinc and germanium– Pozzolanic CSH can take up mobile cations– Brucite and hydrotalcite are both excellent hosts for toxic and

hazardous wastes. – Heavy metals not taken up in the structure of Portland cement

minerals or trapped within the brucite layers end up as hydroxides with minimal solubility.

The Brucite in TecEco cements has a structure comprising electronically neutral layers and is able to accommodate a wide variety of extraneous substances between the layers and cations of similar size substituting for magnesium within the layers and is known to be very suitable for toxic and hazardous waste immobilisation.

Layers of electronically neutral brucite suitable for trapping balanced cations and anions as well as other substances.

Salts and other substances trapped between the layers.

Van de waals bonding holding the layers together.


Lower Solubility of Metal HydroxidesLower Solubility of Metal Hydroxides

Pb(OH) Cr(OH) 3

Zn(OH) 2

Ag(OH) Cu(OH) 2 Ni(OH) 2 Cd(OH) 2

10 -6

10 -4

10 -2

10 0

10 2

Co

nce

ntr

atio

n o

f D

isso

lved

Met

al, (

mg

/L)

14 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

Equilibrium pH of brucite is 10.52 (more ideal)*

Equilibrium pH of Portlandite is 12.35

*Equilibrium pH’s in pure water, no other ions present. The solubility of toxic metal hydroxides is generally less in the range pH 10.52 -11.2 than at higher pH’s.

Equilibrium pH of PC CSH is 11.2

There is a 104 difference

All waste streams will contain heavy metals and a strategy for long term pH control is therefore essential


Using Wastes and Non-Traditional Aggregates to Make TecEco Cement Concretes


Many wastes and local materials can contribute physical property values.– Plastics for example are collectively light in weight, have tensile

strength and low conductance. Tec, eco and enviro-cements will allow a wide range of

wastes and non-traditional aggregates such as local materials to be used.

Tec, enviro and eco-cements are benign binders that are:– low alkali reducing reaction problems with organic materials.– stick well to most included wastes

Tec, enviro and eco-cements can utilize wastes including carbon to increase sequestration preventing their conversion to methane

There are huge volumes of concrete produced annually (>2 tonnes per person per year)


Biomimicry - Ultimate RecyclersBiomimicry - Ultimate Recyclers As peak oil looms and the price of transport is set to rise sharply

– We should not just be recycling based on chemical property requiring sophisticated equipment and resources

– We should be including wastes based on physical properties as well as chemical composition in composites whereby they become local resources.

The Jackdaw recycles all sorts of things it finds nearby based on physical property.

The bird is not concerned about chemical composition and the nest it makes could be described as a composite material.

TecEco cements are benign binders that can incorporate all sort of wastes without reaction problems. We can do the same as the Jackdoor




As the price of fuel rises, theuse of local or on site lowembodied energy materialsrather than carted aggregateswill have to be considered.

Recent natural disasters such as the recent tsunami and Pakistani earthquake mean we urgently need to commercialize TecEco technologies because they provide benign environments allowing the use of many local materials and wastes without delayed reactions

No longer an option?

The use of on site and local wastes will be made possible by the use of low reactivity TecEco mixes and a better understanding of particle packing. We hope with our new software to be able to demonstrate how adding specific size ranges can make an unusable waste such as a tailing or sludge suitable for making cementitious materials.


Easier to Finish ConcretesEasier to Finish Concretes

Easier to pump and finish Concretes are likely to have less water added to them resulting in less cracking


Non Newtonian RheologyNon Newtonian Rheology

O

O

O

O Mg++

+

- +

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

O +

+

+

+

+

+

O

O O

- -

- -

-

-

The strongly positively charged small Mg++ atoms attract water (which is polar) in deep layers introduce a shear thinning property affecting the rheological properties and making concretes less “sticky” with added pozzolan

It is not known how deep these layers get

Etc.

Etc.

Ca++ = 114, Mg++ = 86 picometres


Bingham Plastic RheologyBingham Plastic Rheology

TecEco concretes and mortars are:– Very homogenous and do not segregate easily. They exhibit good adhesion and have a

shear thinning property.

– Exhibit Bingham plastic qualities and react well to energy input.

– Have good workability.

TecEco concretes with the same water/binder ratio have a lower slump but greater plasticity and workability.

TecEco tec-cements are potentially suitable for mortars, renders, patch cements, colour coatings, pumpable and self compacting concretes.

A range of pumpable composites with Bingham plastic properties will be required in the future as buildings will be “printed.”

Second layer low slump tec-cement concrete Tech Tendons

First layer low slump tec-cement concrete


Scientific approach to concrete designScientific approach to concrete design

In the past, concrete proportioning was based on experience and estimates only. TecEco is develloping batching software, using theory from the world’s best experts theory (F. de Larrard, K. Day), to optimize mix design and particularly particle packing.

Satterfield, S. G. (2001). Visualization of High Performance Concrete, National institute of standard and technology.


Scientific approach to concrete design (2)Scientific approach to concrete design (2)

TecEco sees the optimization of particle as not only a mean to improve the strength/cost ratio but to improve concrete sustainability. This is because improving packing (other parameter beiing equal) leads to an increase of:– The compressive and tensile strength– The workability – The durability

And a decrease of:– The porosity– The risk of segregation– The yield stresses (easier to compact)

Scientific knowledge of the concrete behaviour coupled with the use of optimization software allows concrete technologist to:- Design more sustainable concrete- Use secondary aggregate and mining waste (poor size distribution)- Dramatically reduce the number of experiment needed to design a

concrete for a special application


Tec-Cement ConcretesTec-Cement ConcretesTec-Cements contain around 5-20% reactive

MgO and are mainly formulated because of:– Superior thixotropic properties– Less cracking and shrinkage– Greater durability– Low reactivity

• Ability to incorporate a wide range of wastes.

TecEco are looking for technical problems that are not being solved using conventional formulations as to us they represent niche markets.


The TecEco Dream – A More Sustainable Built EnvironmentThe TecEco Dream – A More Sustainable Built Environment

MAGNESITE + OTHER INPUTS

TECECO CONCRETES

MINING

SUSTAINABLE CITIES

CO2

PERMANENT SEQUESTRATION & WASTE UTILISATION (Man made carbonate rock incorporating wastes as a building material)

CO2

MgOTECECO KILN

RECYCLED BUILDING MATERIALS

CO2

OTHERWASTES

CO2 FOR GEOLOGICAL SEQUESTRATION

We need materials that require less energy to make them, that last much longer and that contribute properties that reduce lifetime energies

“There is a way to make our city streets as green as the Amazon rainforest”. Fred Pearce, New Scientist Magazine


Sustainable Materials in the Built Environment - 2007Sustainable Materials in the Built Environment - 2007

Technical FocusThis Conference will focus on: The impacts and connectivity

of different parts of the supply chain.

Fabrication, performance, recycling and waste

New developments in materials and processes

Reviewing existing materials assessment tools

Future directions in regulation

Opportunities/barriers to introduction of sustainable materials and technologies in the building industry.

New materials and more sustainable built environments: the evidence?

Joint Venture WebsitesASSMIC Website: www.aasmic.orgMaterials Australia Website: www.materialsaustralia.com.au

presentation downloadable from 1 implementing sustainability our slides are deliberately verbose as...

Documents

presentation downloadable

materials flows

waste slide

underlying molecular

tonnes of waste

natural flows

water use

use waste materials