presentation 2 - june 29, 2016
TRANSCRIPT
2017 UTP and HB 20 Implementation 06/29/2016
2017 UNIFIED TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM AND HB 20 IMPLEMENTATION Texas Transportation Commission Workshop – 06/29/16
2017 UTP and HB 20 Implementation 06/29/2016
Commission Workshop Outline
Introduction of performance-based planning and programming processes.
Overview of additional funding allocations and sources in the 2017 Unified Transportation Program (UTP), strategic priorities, and application of portfolio management processes.
Over $66 billion of existing and new funding in UTP includes funding for key priorities: ― Address safety ― Preserve assets ― Target congestion/urban mobility needs ― Enhance regional connectivity corridors ― Focus on strategic initiatives
2
2017 UTP and HB 20 Implementation 06/29/2016
Commission Workshop Outline - continued
Metropolitan planning organizations’ (MPOs) perspective on congestion and connectivity needs, and use of performance-based planning.
Review of strategic priorities, 2017 UTP funding, and next steps.
Timeline and on-going implementation of administrative rule changes related to HB 20.
3
2017 UTP and HB 20 Implementation 06/29/2016
Performance-Based Planning and Programming - Background
The proposed performance-based allocation of funds is a result of collaboration with stakeholders including: Governor Abbott's priorities for TxDOT.
Legislative guidance in accordance with the directive's of HB 20.
MPO and District Engineer Planning Organization Stakeholder Committee (POSC).
Current goals and objectives of the department.
4
2017 UTP and HB 20 Implementation 06/29/2016
Additional Funding in
2017 Unified Transportation Program
Bill Hale, P.E.
5
2017 UTP and HB 20 Implementation 06/29/2016
Additional Funding - Anticipated Sources
Additional $38.3 billion funding to be allocated over 10 years as part of the 2017 UTP for fiscal years of 2017-2026. $10.2 billion of traditional State Highway Funds (SHF) from:
– FAST Act – End of diversions from the SHF – Remaining unallocated funds in future years of the UTP
$6.3 billion from Proposition 1
$21.8 billion from Proposition 7
6
2017 UTP and HB 20 Implementation 06/29/2016
Additional Funding - Anticipated Sources
7
$5,900,000,000
$4,000,000,000
$400,000,000
$6,300,000,000
$21,800,000,000
Diversions
Federal
Other SHF
Proposition 1
Proposition 7
$38.3 billion over 10 years
2017 UTP and HB 20 Implementation 06/29/2016
Additional funding – Proposed Distribution
8
Program Areas and Objectives 10 Year Additional
Funding ($ Billion)
Safety / Preserve Existing Assets $ 6.9
- Safety 1.3 - Maintenance 2.6 - Bridges 0.5 - Energy Sector 2.1 - District Discretionary 0.4
Congestion/Urban Mobility $ 21.2
- MPO Partnerships 11.2 - Connectivity Corridor Congestion 5.0 - Strategic Congestion Initiative 5.0
Regional Connectivity Corridors $ 6.2
Interstates (Existing and Future), Trunk System, Border, Super 2-Lane
Additional Strategic Priorities $ 4.0
Total $ 38.3
2017 UTP and HB 20 Implementation 06/29/2016
Strategic Priorities and Anticipated Performance Outcomes
Top strategic priorities Anticipated performance outcomes
Address safety Reduce crashes and fatalities
Preserve assets Maintain and preserve system/asset conditions
Target congestion/urban mobility needs Mitigate congestion and improve reliability of system
Enhance regional connectivity corridors Enhance connectivity and mobility
Focus on strategic initiatives (energy sector, trade, and economic development)
Enhance economic development opportunities; facilitate movement of freight and international trade
9
2017 UTP and HB 20 Implementation 06/29/2016
Integration of Portfolio Planning Process
10
2017 UTP and HB 20 Implementation 06/29/2016
Safety and Asset Preservation
Lauren D. Garduño, P.E.
11
2017 UTP and HB 20 Implementation 06/29/2016
Address Safety and Preserve Assets ($24.4 billion – Total UTP Funding)
Priorities include reducing crashes and fatalities, preserving assets, and addressing energy sector area needs.
Safety – Total of $3.2 billion in Category 8 - Safety funding will allow TxDOT to increase safety initiatives and programs by 68% and leverage additional partnerships.
Maintenance and Rehabilitation – Total of $13.8 billion, reflecting an increase in Category 1 - Maintenance funding by 24% enabling Districts to set baseline targets for preserving current pavement conditions with a goal of improving conditions to an overall state of good repair.
12
2017 UTP and HB 20 Implementation 06/29/2016
Address Safety and Preserve Assets - continued
Bridges – Total of $3.5 billion in Category 6 - Bridge funding reflecting an increase in bridge rehabilitation and replacement funding by 17% to help preserve and improve assets.
Energy Sector – Total of $2.1 billion of anticipated Proposition 1 funding, distributed through Category 11 energy production/distribution-based formula. Combined with other applicable categories, funding will enable districts to address energy-related needs and respond to production activity in their areas.
Local District Needs – Total of $1.8 billion will increase Category 11 - District Discretionary funding by 24% to allow districts to address additional local priorities.
13
2017 UTP and HB 20 Implementation 06/29/2016
Energy Sector
Randy C. Hopmann, P.E.
14
2017 UTP and HB 20 Implementation 06/29/2016
Texas’ Energy Sector
15
Anticipated $400 – $450 million per year will be invested for safety, maintenance, and capacity needs in the energy sector corridor improvement program.
Texas energy sector program includes funding from the UTP Maintenance, Connectivity, Safety, and District Discretionary categories.
2017 UTP and HB 20 Implementation 06/29/2016
Elements of Program
Reinforce pavements: – Strengthen pavement structures; – Add shoulders to protect pavement edges; – Add turn lanes at key intersections; and – Construct passing lanes on Super 2 corridors.
TxDOT has conducted two workshops with energy sector stakeholders, and plans to conduct more.
Districts have identified major corridors needing improvement in energy areas and have prioritized projects.
16
2017 UTP and HB 20 Implementation 06/29/2016
Energy Sector Corridor Funding Needs
17
Energy Play Priority 1 Corridor Estimate (in millions)
Eagle Ford Shale $ 569
Permian Basin 676
Barnett Shale 271
Anadarko Basin 97
Haynesville-Bossier 179
Total $ 1.8 Billion
A total of $1.8 billion in projects have been identified as “Priority 1” corridor needs throughout the state’s energy sector areas.
An additional $1.25 billion in projects have been identified as “Priority 2” needs. Multiple UTP funding categories will be used to support funding targets for the energy sector
2017 UTP and HB 20 Implementation 06/29/2016
Congestion and
Urban Mobility
Randy C. Hopmann, P.E.
18
2017 UTP and HB 20 Implementation 06/29/2016
Congestion and Urban Mobility – Category 2 Funding
Priorities include establishing partnerships with districts and MPOs to: ― Target congestion and improve safety in metro and urban areas. ― Use performance-based project selection to optimize system performance. ― Provide a strategic focus on congested areas and key trade corridors.
Funds distributed by agreed upon formula that includes consideration of: ― Population ― Total traffic (vehicle miles of travel) ― Miles of highways ― Truck traffic
Projects selected and ranked by MPOs in consultation with TxDOT Districts, and approved by the Commission.
19
2017 UTP and HB 20 Implementation 06/29/2016
Additional Funding for MPO Congestion and Mobility
20
Metropolitan Planning Organization (District)
Additional Category 2 Funding Distributed Over 10 Years of UTP
% Distribution $ Amount
Abilene (ABL) 0.57 $ 63,886,000
Amarillo (AMA) 0.92 103,275,000
Austin Area – CAMPO (AUS) 9.37 1,049,435,000
Beaumont – SETRPC (BMT) 2.34 261,662,000
Brownsville (PHR) 0.81 91,212,000
Bryan-College Station (BRY) 0.99 110,831,000
Corpus Christi (CRP) 1.34 150,388,000
Dallas/Ft. Worth – NCTCOG (DAL/FTW/PAR) 31.55 3,534,180,000
El Paso (ELP) 2.93 327,705,000
Harlingen-San Benito (PHR) 0.72 80,322,000
Hidalgo County (PHR) 2.98 334,172,000
Houston-Galveston Area – HGAC (BMT/HOU) 24.84 2,782,651,000
Killeen-Temple (BWD/WAC) 1.86 207,882,000
2017 UTP and HB 20 Implementation 06/29/2016
Additional Funding for MPO Congestion and Mobility - continued
21
Metropolitan Planning Organization (District)
Additional Category 2 Funding Distributed Over 10 Years of UTP
% Distribution $ Amount
Laredo (LRD) 0.91 $ 101,924,000
Longview (ATL/TYL) 0.63 70,404,000
Lubbock (LBB) 0.92 103,089,000
Midland-Odessa – Permian Basin (AUS) 1.44 160,807,000
San Angelo (SJT) 0.37 41,854,000
San Antonio Area – AAMPO (SAT) 9.49 1,062,678,000
Sherman-Denison (PAR) 0.69 77,349,000
Texarkana (ATL) 0.33 37,197,000
Tyler (TYL) 1.25 139,983,000
Victoria (YKM) 0.63 70,173,000
Waco (WAC) 1.67 186,895,000
Wichita Falls (WFS) 0.46 51,558,000
TOTAL 100.00 $ 11,201,512,000
2017 UTP and HB 20 Implementation 06/29/2016
Congestion and Urban Mobility – Targeted Programs
Two targeted funding programs will focus on heavily congested areas and key trade corridors. Texas Clear Lanes (strategic congestion initiative) – More than $5 billion in additional
funding allocated through Category 12 – Strategic Priorities to target congestion and optimize system performance within the state’s most congested areas. – Projects prioritized and selected based on project recommendation criteria
consistent with HB 20. – Target TxDOT districts that include: o Urban area of over 1.5 million population o Average commuter delay of at least 40 hours per year (TTI Urban Mobility Report); o At least 10 segments identified on Top 100 Most Congested Roadways in Texas.
22
2017 UTP and HB 20 Implementation 06/29/2016
Congestion and Urban Mobility - Targeted Programs (continued)
Connectivity Corridor Congestion (3C) – $5 billion in additional funding allocated through Category 4 – Connectivity for prioritized and performance based needs on interstates and major freight/trade corridors. Projects to be prioritized and selected based on project recommendation criteria
consistent with HB 20.
At least 80% of funds are expected to be directed to urban districts with: ― At least 3 segments identified in a single year over past 3 years on Top 100 Most
Congested Roadways listing; or ― Single metropolitan planning area with population greater than 1 million based on
latest Texas State Data Center estimate.
Remaining funds may be directed to 3C priorities in urban areas statewide.
23
2017 UTP and HB 20 Implementation 06/29/2016
Congestion and Urban Mobility - Federal Programs
Congestion Mitigation & Air Quality (Category 5) – $2.2 billion distributed to 3 non-attainment metropolitan areas (Dallas-Fort Worth, Houston, and El Paso). Each project is evaluated to quantify its air quality improvement benefits to address attainment of National Ambient Air Quality Standards.
Metropolitan Mobility and Rehabilitation (Category 7) - $4.2 billion distributed to MPOs with an urbanized area population of 200,000 or greater (Transportation Management Areas). Projects are selected and ranked by MPOs in consultation with TxDOT.
24
2017 UTP and HB 20 Implementation 06/29/2016
Congestion and Urban Mobility ($28.9 Billion – Total UTP Funding)
Total UTP “Congestion Relief Initiative” funding = $28.9 billion over 10 years. Initiative includes funding from:
25
Funding Category 10 Year Additional
Funding ($ Billion)
Cat. 2 – Metropolitan & Urban Corridors $12.5
Cat. 4 – Connectivity 5.0
Cat. 5 – Congestion Mitigation & Air Quality 2.2
Cat. 7 – Metropolitan Mobility & Rehabilitation 4.2
Cat. 12 – Strategic Priority (Congestion Initiative) 5.0
TOTAL $ 28.9
Category 2 distribution will include all 25 MPOs statewide.
2017 UTP and HB 20 Implementation 06/29/2016
Regional Connectivity
Lauren D. Garduño, P.E.
26
2017 UTP and HB 20 Implementation 06/29/2016
Regional Connectivity Corridors ($6.6 billion – Total UTP Funding)
A total of $6.2 billion of additional funding allocated through Category 4 - Connectivity to rural areas of the state to address regional connectivity, safety, and facilitate the movement of freight and international trade to foster economic growth. Preliminary regional connectivity corridor priorities: ― I-10 - Various segments from Beaumont to San Antonio ― I-20/I-30 - Various segments from Dallas to Louisiana/Arkansas lines ― I-35 - Various segments statewide ― I-45 - Various segments from Houston to Dallas ― I-69 - Various segments statewide ― Other statewide interstate and Texas Trunk System/Freight Network corridors
(includes additional interstate and U.S./State Highways segments, key border trade corridors, and hurricane evacuation and port routes)
― Statewide Super 2 corridors
27
2017 UTP and HB 20 Implementation 06/29/2016
Regional Connectivity Corridors
28
Regional connectivity initiative funding targets connectivity corridors in rural areas of the state.
Candidate corridors reviewed with statewide planning organizations:
TxDOT Districts MPOs
2017 UTP and HB 20 Implementation 06/29/2016
Criteria for Ranking Priority Corridors
The following criteria are proposed for consideration to rank corridors for receipt of regional connectivity initiative funding: Enhance existing Interstate network
Complete proposed future interstate network
Complete existing Texas Trunk System network
Expand Texas Trunk System/Freight Network
On a hurricane evacuation route
Align with energy sector and safety priorities
29
2017 UTP and HB 20 Implementation 06/29/2016
Texas Super 2 Corridors
30
Historical limitations on funding in Category 4 – Connectivity have resulted in the development of a Super 2 Corridor Plan.
Super 2 lanes have been used throughout the state to address connectivity and safety needs on the existing infrastructure network.
2017 UTP and HB 20 Implementation 06/29/2016
MPO Perspective
Ashby Johnson – CAMPO/TEMPO Executive Director Chris Evilia – Waco MPO/TEMPO Deputy Director
Alan Clark – HGAC Michael Morris – NCTCOG
31
2017 UTP and HB 20 Implementation 06/29/2016
Strategic Priorities, Funding Summary, HB 20
Implementation, and Next Steps
Marc D. Williams, P.E.
32
2017 UTP and HB 20 Implementation 06/29/2016
Additional Strategic Initiatives ($5.2 billion – Total UTP Funding)
Beyond the strategic congestion initiative, an additional $5.2 billion will be allocated. Support statewide priorities and strategic goal areas as set forth in HB 20 that:
– Address safety – Preserve assets (highway and bridge conditions) – Target congestion/urban mobility needs – Enhance regional connectivity corridors – Focus on strategic initiatives (energy sector, trade & economic development)
Funding can be allocated to projects with commission approval.
Foster partnership for project funding with planning organizations and other stakeholders.
33
2017 UTP and HB 20 Implementation 06/29/2016
Proposed Working Allocation for 2017 UTP
34
Funding Categories Funding Distributed Over 10 Years of UTP by Category
Current UTP Base Increase in Funds Proposed UTP Funding
Category 1 – Maintenance & Rehabilitation $ 11,158,000,000 $ 2,625,000,000 $ 13,782,000,000
Category 2 – Metropolitan and Urban Corridor Projects 1,322,000,000 11,202,000,000 12,523,000,000
Category 3 - Non-Traditionally Funded Projects (not in UTP base) TBD – Funding not included in UTP base
Category 4 - Connectivity (Regional) 429,000,000 6,206,000,000 6,634 ,000,000
Category 4 - Connectivity (Congestion) - 4,996,000,000 4,996,000,000
Category 5 - Congestion Mitigation/Air Quality (3 MPOs) 2,159,000,000 - 2,159,000,000
Category 6 – Bridge Programs 3,000,000,000 514,000,000 3,514,000,000
Category 7 – Metropolitan Mobility & Rehabilitation (Large MPOs) 4,219,000,000 - 4,219,000,000
Category 8 – Safety Programs 1,887,000,000 1,291,000,000 3,178,000,000
Category 9 – Transportation Alternatives Program 498,000,000 - 498,000,000
Category 10 - Special Federal Programs 504,000,000 - 504,000,000
Category 11 - District Discretionary Projects 1,476,000,000 360,000,000 1,836,000,000
Category 11 - District Discretionary (Energy Sector Initiative) - 2,079,000,000 2,079,000,000
Category 12 - Strategic Priority Projects 1,087,000,000 4,064,000,000 5,151,000,000
Category 12 - Strategic Priority (Congestion Initiative) - 5,000,000,000 5,000,000,000
Total Allocated Funding $ 27,738,000,000 $ 38,336,000,000 $ 66,074,000,000
2017 UTP and HB 20 Implementation 06/29/2016
Category Funding and Strategic Initiative Alignment
35
Funding Categories Safety Preserve Assets Congestion/
Mobility Connectivity Other * Maintenance Bridge
Category 1 - Maintenance and Rehabilitation $13.8B
Category 2 – Metropolitan and Urban Corridors $12.5B
Category 4 - Connectivity $5.0B $6.6B
Category 5 – CMAQ (3 MPOs) $2.2B
Category 6 - Bridge $3.5B
Category 7 – Metropolitan Mobility (Large MPOs) $4.2B
Category 8 - Safety $3.2B
Category 9 - Transportation Alternatives $0.5B
Category 11 - District Discretionary $1.8B & $2.1B (ES)**
Category 12 - Strategic Priority $5.0B
* Other – Includes bicycle, pedestrian, transit, and multi-modal projects. ** Energy Sector
Primary funding source for initiative Secondary funding source for initiative
2017 UTP and HB 20 Implementation 06/29/2016
HB 20/UTP Rule Promulgation- Timeline
36
May 2016
Jun 2016
Jul 2016
Aug 2016
Sept 2016
Oct 2016
Nov 2016
Dec 2016
Jan 2017
Feb 2017
Mar 2017
April 2017
May 2017
Jun 2017
Jul 2017
Aug 2017
HB 20 Reports
HB 20/ UTP Rules
2017 UTP
2018 UTP
Sunset Review
Key Deliverables In Development
Initial Report issued 09.01.15
Preliminary Report issued 04.01.16 House & Senate Select Committees’ Report to be issued 11.01.16
Commission Action Public Involvement Key Dates
Sunset Review Sunset Report Issued
Hearing on Report TxDOT Response
Adoption of Recommendations File Sunset Bill
Commission Adoption
Commission Adoption Brief Commission on
new Funding Targets/ Distribution Strategy
Provide districts/ MPO’s new targets
Initial rule development/ public involvement/ adoption
Post-Sunset rule development/ public involvement/ adoption
Commission Briefing
Commission Workshop
Commission Adoption of Quarterly Update
2017 UTP and HB 20 Implementation 06/29/2016
Next Steps
Development of 2017 UTP with proposed funding allocations: – Issue Draft UTP (July) – Conduct public involvement (July-August) – Commission adoption of Final UTP (August)
Consider revisions to Texas Administrative Code (administrative rules) to better align with HB 20: – Preliminary review by Commission (August) – Conduct public involvement (September - November) – Commission adoption of final rules (November)
TxDOT and MPOs, through POSC, will continue development of improved performance-based process for selection and prioritization of projects to provide consistency for future UTP funding decisions.
TxDOT and Commission will continue work with executive leadership, legislative direction, and stakeholder input on development and implementation of a more robust performance-based planning process for inclusion in the 2018 UTP.
37