July 2, 2004

1

Presentación final

Universidad Católica Boliviana “SAN PABLO”

Pieter, Menno, Janet, Jeroen

July 2, 2004 2

Contenido

• Presentación Ingeniería Civil• Ingeniería Civil en Holanda• Universidad TU Delft• Carrera de Ingeniería Civil

• Proyecto de maestría en UCB

July 2, 2004 3

Presentacíon Ingeniería Civil

July 2, 2004 4

Site analysisBig scale to a small scale

Bolivia

Cochabamba

Building plot

Universidad Católica Boliviana

Global information

Specific information

July 2, 2004 5

Universidad Católica Boliviana

July 2, 2004 6

Universidad Católica Boliviana

Functional plan First level

July 2, 2004 7

Universidad Católica Boliviana

Functional plan Second level

July 2, 2004 8

Universidad Católica Boliviana

Functional plan Third level

July 2, 2004 9

Universidad Católica Boliviana

Functional plan Fourth level

July 2, 2004 10

Universidad Católica Boliviana

Main flow plan on campus

July 2, 2004 11

Building plot

Possible site for new buildings

Present building ‘Edificio de Aulas’

Perimeter wall

Fig: 2.5.1 the plot

July 2, 2004 12

Existing buildingProblems:

• Cold in the morning

• Some of the lecture rooms at ground floor are very noisy because of their location near busy walking routes.

•The building is inaccessible for disabled people.

• Insufficient number of toilets. On the ground floor only toilets for females are present, at the first floor the toilets are only for males.

PLANTA BAJA

AULA 1

AULA 2

AULA 3

AULA 4

AULA 5

AULA 6

BAÑO MUJERES

CENTRO DE ESTUDIANTES ING. AMBIENTAL

1ra PLANTA

AULA 7

AULA 8

BAÑO BOMBRES

AULA 9

AULA 10

AULA 11

AULA 12

DEP.

DEP.

2da PLANTA ATERRAZA

Fig: 2.5.2-1 Ground floor Fig: 2.5.2-2 First floor

Fig: 2.5.2-3 Second floor Fig: 2.5.2-4 Third floor / terrace

July 2, 2004 13

SWOT analysis (FODA)

• Strong points: New auditorium, mild weather conditions

• Weak points: Entrance lies far from the plot

• Opportunities: Better accesibility and use existing building

• Threats : Estimated growth of students is too high

July 2, 2004 14

Stakeholders

• Governmental bodies: improval definitive design

• Client: financing: project, making decisions• Committee of Infrastructure UCB

• Operators/ personnel: operate, maintain and manage building

• Users: students and teachers

• External parties: architects, engineers and contractors

July 2, 2004 15

Questionnaire

• The present cafeteria is both too small • The new library must be bigger then the present one• More computers must be available the entire day• More and better toilets are wanted• The present laboratories are outdated • Climate in class rooms are bad ( too cold in winter)

July 2, 2004 16

Problem analysis• Definition problem

• The current campus Tupuraya of the university Católica Boliviana will reach its capacity within a few years and needs expansion to meet its future capacity

• Objectives• The objective of this project is to make a structural design for the

future university building of campus Tupuraya, which will meet the requirements of the Committee of Infrastructure of the UCB.

• Limiting conditions/starting points/assumptions• Functional, technical, legal, financial, environmental, social,

construction

July 2, 2004 17

Functional analysis

Determination growth area of functions

Expected growth of the number of students

Growth factors

July 2, 2004 18

Expected growth of studentsCampus Tupuraya

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29

Semester

Num

ber o

f stu

dent

s

Total Departament DCSTotal Departament DAEFTotal Departament DCEI

July 2, 2004 19

Variables and growth factors

Variables Actual 5 years 10 years Actual 5 years 10 years Actual 5 years 10 years Actual 5 years 10 yearsStudents 996 1257 1610 864 1200 1500 863 1050 1300 2723 3507 4410

Laboratories offered per semester 36 45 58 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 45 58Studies level pregraduated 6 7 8 3 4 5 5 6 8 14 17 21postgraduated programs 2 4 5 3 5 7 0 4 5 5 13 17

Fulltime teachers 5 9 10 2 4 6 4 7 10 11 20 26Courses that require computer laboratories 16 20 26 10 15 20 8 10 12 34 45 58

Administrative personel 8 10 11 2 4 6 5 7 8 15 21 25

DCEI DAEF DCS Total

Infrastructure 0- 5 years 0- 10 yearsLecture rooms 1,29 1,62Students laboratories 1,25 1,50Research laboratories no current area 1,50Teacher rooms 1,82 2,36Offices administrative personel 1,18 1,41Work spaces 1,29 1,62Internet spaces 1,29 1,62Computer laboratories 1,32 1,70Control room no current area 1,00Library 1,29 1,62Auditorium no current area 1,00Cafetaria 1,29 1,62Toilets 1,29 1,62 based on growth total number of studentsSECRAD no growth defined no growth definedChapel 1,29 1,62 based on growth total number of students

Growth factors

Variables

July 2, 2004 20

Determination growth of functions (m2)

Total UCB (our calculation based on measurements and our growth factors)

Needed expansion over 10 yearsInfrastructure Actual 5 years 10 years new sectionLecture rooms 2155 2775 3490 1335Students laboratories 622 778 933 933 Relocation and expansionResearch laboratories 0 136 204 204Teacher rooms 783 940 1253 470 Adjusted growth factorOffices administrative personel 1047 1232 1478 431Work spaces 168 216 271 104Internet spaces 120 192 240 120 Adjusted growth factorComputer laboratories 381 457 610 229 Adjusted growth factorControl room 45 115 115 70Library 282 363 457 457 Relocation and expansionAuditorium 0 570 570 570Cafetaria 209 269 338 338 Relocation and expansionToilets 355 457 575 220SECRAD 252 252 252 252 RelocationChapel 70 90 113 113 Relocation and expansionTotal functions 6489 8842 10900 5846With 30% infrastructure 8435 11495 14169 7600

Requiered area in m2

July 2, 2004 21

Interaction matrix

12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

cafetaria

auditorium

library

control room

computer laboratories

internet rooms

work spaces

administrative offices

teachers rooms

research labs

student labs

lecture rooms

1 lecture rooms 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 X2 student labs 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 3 X3 research labs 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 X4 teachers rooms 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 X5 administrative offices 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 X6 work spaces 1 0 2 0 1 2 X7 internet rooms 2 0 2 3 2 X8 computer laboratories 0 0 1 2 X9 control room 0 0 0 X10 library 0 0 X11 auditorium 1 X12 cafetaria X

July 2, 2004 22

Functional synthesis

Circle diagram

Bubble diagram

Square diagram

Flow diagram

Mapping on plot

Basis circle diagram

Enhanced circle diagram

Circle diagram with areas of functions

July 2, 2004 23

Circle diagram

Basis circle diagram

July 2, 2004 24

Circle diagramEnhanced circle diagram

July 2, 2004 25

Circle diagramCircle diagram with areas of functions

July 2, 2004 26

Bubble diagram

July 2, 2004 27

Square diagram

July 2, 2004 28

Flow Diagram

July 2, 2004 29

Mapping on plot

July 2, 2004 30

First level

July 2, 2004 31

Second level

July 2, 2004 32

Third level

+35% Infrastucture

July 2, 2004 33

Recommendations

•Area for students laboratories has to be increased

•Internet rooms should be at the ground level

•Control room has to be located near the internet rooms

•Connection with existing building (slope)

•Toilets more evenly spread

July 2, 2004 34

Spatial design

Mock up

Auditorium

Existing block

Laboratories

Main new building

July 2, 2004 35

Spatial design• Facades

July 2, 2004 36

Spatial design• Floor plans

July 2, 2004 37

Spatial design• Floor plan: level 1

July 2, 2004 38

Spatial design• Floor plan: level 2

July 2, 2004 39

Spatial design• Floor plan: Level 3, 4, 5

July 2, 2004 40

Spatial design• Floor plan: Level 6

July 2, 2004 41

Structural design process