premium iol’s patient evaluation, lens choice and dealing with … · 2019-10-30 · eye1 in one...
TRANSCRIPT
10/15/19
1
PremiumIOL’sPatientEvaluation,LensChoiceandDealingwithProblems
Douglas K. Devries, ODEye Care Associates of Nevada
1
FinancialInterestDisclosure• Douglas K. Devries
• Consultant or Speakers Bureau for • Allergan• Alcon• Akorn• Bausch Health Care• BioTissue• Bruder• BVI• EyeVance• Eyes 4 Lives• Kala• Johnson & Johnson Vision/AMO• Lumenis• OcuSoft• Oyster Point• RySurg• Revision Optics• TearLab• Science Based Health• Shire Pharmaceuticals• Sun Pharmaceuticals
2
CourseGoals• Discuss Peri-Operative Management of Cataract Surgery • Patient Education of Dysfunctional Lens Syndrome• IOL Choices & Presbyopia Correction Options
• Multi-Focal• Extended Depth of Focus (EDOF)
• Patient Choices & Toric IOLS
3
WhyCo-Manage?
• Discussion:• First and Foremost: Patient Care• Patient Education• Patient Retention• Financial Impact
4
Demographics
1. 2015 Comprehensive Report on the Global IOL Market. Market Scope 2. US Census Bureau, 2012 3. gallup.com/poll/166952/baby-boomers.reluctant-retire.aspx 4. NextAvenue, nextavenue.org/hottest-trends-boomer-travel 5. AARP Getting to Know Americans Age 50+, 2014 6. AARP Planning Complete Streets for an Aging America, May 2009
5
GrowthofCataractSurgeryPatients• Significant growth of the 65+ yo population
Ann Surg. 2003 Aug; 238(2): 170–177.
6
10/15/19
2
TreatmentAstigmatism&PresbyopiainCataractSurgery
Every patient over the age of 50 is impacted by presbyopia1, yet only 6.5% of patients receive a presbyopia-correcting IOL
67%
8%
25%
33%
% of Patients receiving Toric IOL
■Patients > 1.0D Astigmatism■Patients receiving Toric IOL
1/3 of Patients have > 1.0D of astigmatism but only 1/4 of those patients are receiving a Toric IOL
6.5%
93.5%
% of Patients receiving PC IOL
PC I OL
Monofocal IOL
Patients who do not have astigmatism and presbyopia treated at the time of cataract surgery must treat those conditions with glasses for the rest of their lives.
1. 2016 Market Scope
7
WhoSeesCataractPatientsFirst?
ODs perform an estimated 88 million comprehensive eye exams annually of the total of 104 million performed by all eye care professionals, or 85 percent of all comprehensive eye exams.2
2. http://reviewob.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/8-21-13stateofoptometryreport.pdf
Optometrists
Ophtha lmologists
88M (85%)
16M (15%)
40,000
18,000
58,000 eye care professionals are licensed to perform comprehensive eye exams1
1. https://www.aoa.org/Documents/news/state_of_optometry.pdf
8
• The crystalline lens begins…• CLEAR• COLORLESS• FLEXIBLE
The Dysfunctional Lens
9
• … but it doesn’t stay that way.• Lens adds new layers each year• Layers compact• Disulfide bonds accumulate• Lens stiffens• Lens optics change
Dysfunctional Lens Syndrome (DLS)
10
Stage 1 DLS Stage 2 DLS
23 year old lens 48 year old lens 55 year old lens
The Dysfunctional Lens
11
Stage 1 (mid 40’s – early 50’s)• Lens stiffens and cannot change shape as easily• Loss of accommodation
Dysfunctional Lens Syndrome (DLS)
12
10/15/19
3
• Stage 2 (50’s-60’s)• Increasing lens haze• Yellow discoloration• Scatter of light• Decreased quality of vision
Dysfunctional Lens Syndrome (DLS)
13
• Stage 3 (60’s – 80’s)• Cataract: a clouding of the
lens of the eye that obstructs the passage of light
Dysfunctional Lens Syndrome (DLS)
14
Treatment Options
1. Reading glasses or multifocal contact lenses
2. Corneal inlays3. Blended Vision LASIK or
PRK4. RLE for High Hyperopes
DLS Stage 1
15
Treatment Options
1. Reading glasses or multifocal contact lenses
2. Corneal inlays3. Blended Vision LASIK or
PRK with extra DLS education
4. RLE
DLS Stage 2
16
Treatment Options
1. Cataract Surgery• Monofocal IOL• Distance only• Monovision
• Presbyopia Correcting IOL
DLS Stage 3
17
Understand your Patient: Expectations for Presbyopia What they say:
What they want:
“I want to be able to read”
Accommodation
18
10/15/19
4
Discussion
Why is it important to prepare the ocular surface before surgery?
19
19
OurRoleinOptimizingOutcomesWhen needed, pre-treat the ocular surface
Why prepare the ocular surface?ü Better topography images/Improved Biometry (better K’s)ü More comfortable patient ü Faster healingü Outcomesü Accurate biometry drives better outcomes
20TFOS Dews Diagnostic Methodology Report. Jones L. et al. et al Ocul Surf. 2017 Jul. 15(3) 575-628
20
DryEyePrevalenceinPatientsScheduledforCataractSurgery1
• 22.1% of patients had previously received a diagnosis of Dry Eye Disease• 80.9% of patients had an ITF Dry Eye Level 2* or higher, based on the presence of signs and symptoms
* An ITF level of 2 indicates moderate Dry Eye. 1. Trattler et al. Clinical Study Report: Cataract and Dry Eye: Prospective Health Assessment of Cataract Patients Ocular Surface Study. 2010. (Unpublished study.)
80% of Patients Had Dry Eye Severity Score of Level 2 or Higher
11.0% 8.1%23.5%
54.4%
3.0%0
2040
6080
100
Level 0 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4
Per
cen
tag
e o
f P
atie
nts
21
21
PanelDiscussion
When do you treat dry eye?
22
22
“Hot Spots” and “Flat Spots” Are Abnormal
23Im ag es co u rtesy o f K aro lin n e R o ch a, P h D , M D
23
Irregularly Shaped Or Smudgy Placido Disk Is Abnormal
24Im ag es co u rtesy o f E lizab eth Y eu , M D
24
10/15/19
5
Take A Closer Look If Average K Values Are Different
25Im ag es co u rtesy o f E lizab eth Y eu , M D
25
Post-DryEyeTreatment:KValuesAreMuchMoreSimilar
26Im ag es co u rtesy o f E lizab eth Y eu , M D
26
RecommendationstoManageOSD-RelatedPatientExpectations
• Chair time to help patients understand difference between blurred vision from cataracts versus DED
• Cataract surgery can worsen DED for months after surgery1
• Symptoms may not resolve for 3 months or longer
271. TFOS Dews Diagnostic Methodology Report. Jones L. et al. et al Ocul Surf. 2017 Jul. 15(3) 575-628
27
OcularSurfaceTesting• Questionnaire• Osmolarity• Inflammation• Meibography• NaFl Staining and TBUT• Meibomian Gland Evaluation
28
StandardPatientEvaluationofEyeDryness(SPEED)Questionnaire1
• Evaluates the frequency and severity of symptoms
• Developed as an easy to use fast screening tool for dry eye disease
• SPEED questionnaire is one of the tools used to identify candidates for LipiFlow®
2009_Blackie_The Relationship Between Dry Eye Symptoms and Lipid Layer Thickness_Cornea
29
WhyAddressMGDPre-op?
No Significant Structural Change
Duct D ilation, Truncation & Drop Out
Severe Truncation & Drop Out
30
10/15/19
6
Functioningoilgland secretion
Tearscience.com
31
Tearscience.com
No oil gland secretion
32
Discussion
How often do you find gland involvement in patients with ocular surface disease?
33
33
MGDisaLeadingCauseofDryEye1
In one study, 86% of patients diagnosedwith Dry Eye have symptoms associated with an unstable tear film due tocompromised Meibomian gland function. 2
1.Nichols KK, Foulks GN, Bron AJ, et al. The International Workshop on Meibomian Gland Dysfunction: Executive Summary. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science.2011;52(4):1922-1929.2.Lemp, M. A., Crews, L. A., Bron, A. J., Foulks, G. N., & Sullivan, B. D. Distribution of Aqueous-Deficient and Evaporative Dry Eye in a Clinic-Based Patient Cohort. Cornea, 2012;31(5), 472-478.doi:10.1097/ico.0b013e318225415a.
*Both eyes of 299 healthy patients and those with dry eye disease (218 women, 81 men) were evaluated using Schirmer tests and MGD (Foulks-Bron scoring) across 10 sites in the EU and US. Adapted from: Lemp, M. A., Crews, L. A., Bron, A. J., Foulks,G. N., & Sullivan, B. D. Distribution of Aqueous-Deficient and Evaporative Dry Eye in a Clinic-Based Patient Cohort. Cornea, 2012;31(5), 472-478.doi:10.1097/ico.0b013e318225415a.
86%M G D (n=79)50%
M G Dand aqueous
deficient (n=57) 36%
Aqueous deficient
(n=23) 14%
34
VectoredThermalPulsationSystemProvidesHeatandPressuretoLiquefyandEvacuateObstructedGlands
35
Lid warmerComposed of a heater, eye insulation, and vaulted shield
Heat is applied to the palpebral surfaces of the upper and lower eyelids directly over the Meibomian glands
A sterile disposable eyepiece connects to a console used by the physician to control the application of heat and pressure to the eyelids
Eye cups
Graded pulsatile pressure is delivered to the outer eyelid
35
Magnifying lens
Real-time display of eyelid temperature and
treatment duration
One-button control of heating and compression
Charging stand for internal lithium-ion
battery
Sterile, single-patient use disposable Smart Tip
Precision temperature
sensorsSoft,
biocompatible silicone cover
36
10/15/19
7
Heat itApply LED light to
raise the eyelid temperature and
melt the blockages.
TurnuptheHeatonDryEyeTreatment
37
Collins Expressor Forceps (Item 98610)For aggressive expression of the Meibomian gland.
Livengood Expressor PaddlesAngled (Item 98620) & Flat (Item 98630)
For mild or gentle expression of the Meibomian gland.
New! Ophthalmic Surgical Instruments
38
39
Randleman JCRS 2009; 35:992–997
Dry Eye is a Frequent Cause for Dissatisfaction with MF IOLs
ConsiderDryEye
40
Question• Do you make specific IOL recommendations that a patient
should discuss with the surgeon?• A Yes
• B No
41
• Advise patients about potential glare/halos
• Advise patients about light dependency for near (some multifocals)
• Advise patients of limitations in intermediate vision, (multifocals) or near vision (accommodating)
• Advise patient that one eye will be stronger for distance and one stronger for near, if mono
Patient Counseling & Expectation Management:Incorporate Patient Into the Decision
42
10/15/19
8
WhatDoYouKnowAboutYourPatientthatisBeneficialtotheSurgeon?§ Collect important patient information
that will help define their vision goals• Age• Occupational Activities• Leisure Activities• Nighttime Activities• Spectacle Use Expectations• Night Driving• Obsessive/perfectionists • Demanding• Anxious• Unrealistic 43
43
Question• Do you educate patients as to IOL selections?
• A Yes in general terms• B Yes in specific terms as to their needs• C No
44
• Patients wanted to see at ALL distances (near, intermediate, & distance vision)
• What were options for intermediate?
MultifocalAccommodating
Multifocality2014 & prior…
45
Do not underestimate the importance of good intermediate vision
46
• Monofocal IOL Monovision• Mini-monovision with presbyopia IOLs• Mixing and matching presbyopia IOLs• Low add IOLs• EDOF IOLs
Many Evolving Surgical Presbyopia Correcting Options
TecnisMultifocal
ReSTOR CrystalensTecnisSymfony
Low Add MultifocalHigh Add Multifocal
EDOF Accommodating
47
Pros• Cost-effective• Monofocal quality of vision• Less sensitivity to IOL
decentration
Cons• Reduced depth perception
• Feeling of imbalance• Limited intermediate vision• Need for spectacles for night
driving and prolonged reading
Monofocal Monovision IOLsIdeal patient candidates:• Contact lens trial• Patients with experience of
monovision contact lenses
• Type B patients
• Patients who do not mind wearing glasses
• Women
48
10/15/19
9
• Pros:• Good distance visual acuity• Good near vision• Limits spectacle
dependence
• Cons:• Glare and halos (but still
better than other options)• Intermediate VA• Neuroadaptation
Ideal patient candidates:• Avid readers
• Patients that want as much spectacle independence as possible
Low add Multifocal IOLs
49
Extended Depth of Focus (EDOF) IOLs
Visual quality comparable to monofocal
A New Category: What’s unique about EDOF IOLs?
1.
2.
4.
3.
Depth of focus
Night vision symptoms
Tolerance to residual refractive error
50
• Symfony• Unique diffractive echelette design
• Elongated focus• Extended range of vision
• Achromatic for enhanced contrast sensitivity
• Toric EDOF corrects astigmatism
http://www.tecnisiol.com/eu/tecnis-symfony-iol.htm
Extended Depth of Focus (EDOF) IOLs
51
DeliveringElongationofFocus
• Monofocal IOL
• Multifocal IOL
• Tecnis Symfony IOL
Extended Depth of Focus (EDOF) IOLs
52
• Diffractive technology has been associated with multifocal IOLs, but it can be used in different ways
• Other industries use diffractive lenses (cameras, telescopes, microscopes) to optimize optical performance under constrained conditions
Diffractive Technology
53
• The power of the eye is wavelength dependent. Colors that are out-of-focus cause blur and reduce contrast.
• The phakic eye has approximately 1.38 D of chromatic aberration between 450 and 700 nm1. Pseudophakic eyes have between 1.45 and 2 D of chromatic aberration, depending on the dispersion of the IOL material2,3
2. DOF2015OTH0004. 2. Data on file. Longitudinal Chromatic aberration of a monofocal TECNIS Achromat IOL. 3.Weeber et al. Differences in Chromatic Aberration of IOLs, ESCRS 2016.
WhatisChromaticAberration?
54
10/15/19
10
Theimpactofchromaticaberrationonimagequality
55
Achromatic Technology
AdiffractiveIOLwithachromatictechnologycancorrectchromaticaberrationoftheeye
Typical IOL
TECNIS Symfony®
Diffractive Technology
Cornea
+ =
Cornea
+ =
56
85% of patients wore glasses none or a little bit of the time
Extended Depth of Focus (EDOF) IOLsSpectacle Wear
57
What’s Happening at Post-op DAY 1
•Review medications•IOP Check—concern if too high or too low•Check distance vision•Wound secure•Cornea clear/Edema•AC – 1-2+cells / formed•IOL centered•Provide patient instruction:
• Review restrictions – no swimming, no hot tubs, no gardening• Normal to be off balance• Avoid buyers’ remorse
•Fax results to surgeon
58
What’s Happening at Post-op WEEK 1
• Review history/chief complaints and confirm meds
• Check uncorrected vision at distance and near w/ good lighting
• Refract
• IOP
• Slit lamp exam should be clear to < grade 2 cell
• Check for infection or increased signs of inflammation
• Fax results to surgeon
59
What’s Happening at Post-op MONTH 1
•How is the patient functioning?•Check uncorrected vision at distance and near with good lighting
•What is the final refraction•Check IOP•Slit lamp exam
—Clear cornea/edema—Look for surface disease—AC well formed with no cell—IOL well centered in pupil—Evaluate posterior capsule
•Fundus exam—Confirm that there is no CME—Check peripheral retina
• Fax results to the surgeon
60
10/15/19
11
Extended Depth of Focus (EDOF) IOLsManaging Expectations
Neuroadaptation Reminder
• REMIND patients that it is important to give the lens a little time to settle in
• Neuroadaptation time varies from patient to patient
If a patient believed he would be able to see perfectly at all distances, we failed to do our job of setting appropriate expectations… no matter how
stellar the outcomes
61
TheDissatisfiedPatient• Subjective complaints
• Vision quality• Unmatched expectations
• Objective signs• Real or perceived?• Evaluate your data
5 C’sCorneaCentrationCapsuleCMECrazy
62
Randleman JCRS 2009; 35:992–997
Dry Eye is a Frequent Cause for Dissatisfaction with MF IOLs
ConsiderDryEye
63
Astigmatism:RealPrevalence
• >70% of patients have >0.5 D of pre-op astigmatism
• Critical to address for good uncorrected vision
64
AstigmatismandCataractSurgery
More than
of the population has >1 D of astigmatism,but only
1/3
7%of IOLs implantedare toric IOLs1
1. Market Scope, Data as of 2013. Comprehensive Report on Global IOL Market.
65
MethodstoTreatAstigmatism
• LRI or Arcuate Incision• Toric IOL• Glasses or CLs• No special astigmatism correction needed
66
66
10/15/19
12
Regularvsirregularastigmatism• Regular astigmatism
• Generally good candidates for Toric IOLs
• Irregular astigmatism• Often more difficult cases to address with Toric IOLs
RegularAstigmatism
IrregularAstigmatism
67
Lenticularvs.CornealAstigmatism• Corneal Astigmatism
• Will continue to impact visual system after cataract surgery
• Lenticular Astigmatism• Will not continue to impact visual system after cataract surgery• However, needs to be understood preoperatively to assess the
true corneal astigmatism levels
CornealAstigmatism
LenticularAstigmatism
68
WTRvsATRAstigmatism• With the rule astigmatism
• Many patients can tolerate 1.0D or even 1.25D without significant impact on patient satisfaction and visual quality
• Against the rule/oblique astigmatism• Generally has a greater impact on patient satisfaction and
visual quality• Most patients will benefit from having these levels below 0.5
D
With the ruleAstigmatism
Against the ruleAstigmatism
69
AudienceQuestion:ToricorNotoric?• Corneal topography shows 0.5D of corneal astigmatism• Manifest refraction shows 1.75D of overall astigmatism
70
CaseAsktheAudience:ToricorNotoric?• Corneal topography shows 1.75D of corneal astigmatism• Manifest refraction shows 0.25D of overall astigmatism
71
DISCUSSION
• How would you recommend treating an otherwise healthy cataract surgery patient with 0.75D of with the rule cylinder and an interest in less spectacle wear for distance?
The TECNIS Symfony Toric should not be an option for implantation
72
10/15/19
13
DISCUSSION• How would you recommend treating an otherwise
healthy cataract surgery patient with 0.75D of against the rule cylinder and an interest in less spectacle wear for distance?
The TECNIS Symfony Toric should not be an option for implantation
73
ImportanceofHittingTargetwithToricIOLs• 1° rotation = 3.3% decrease effect
• 10° rotation = 33% loss of effect
• 30° rotation = 100% loss of effect
• > 30° degrees = Inducing new astigmatism
74
AstigmatismCorrection
• Options at time of Cataract Surgery
• Monofocal IOL with incisional correction
• On-axis incision
• Corneal Relaxing Incisions –Blade vs. Femtosecond
• Toric IOLs• Monofocal• Multifocal / EDOF
75
MonofocalToric IOLOptions• Alcon (SNATX)• AMO (ZCT Tecnis monofocal)
• Bausch & Lomb (EnVista Toric)• Staar Surgical (Silicone Plate Haptic)
76
PatientSelectionforToricIOLs
• Patient Selection• Desires good uncorrected distance vision without
spectacles• Comfortable with spectacles for near
• Absence of significant or unstable corneal disease affecting the ocular surface or shape
• Astigmatism indications• WTR – Doesn’t need to be treated until up to 1.0D or even
1.25 D• ATR/oblique – Will benefit from getting astig below 0.5 D
77
Discussion
What value does the optometrist provide to the surgeon?
78
78
10/15/19
14
TheFourStagesofPre-OperativeCare• Knows the patients needs and wants• Gather clinical information• Offer education on clinically appropriate options• Pre-treat if indicated
79
79
WhatDoYouKnowAboutYourPatientthatisBeneficialtotheSurgeon?§ Collect important patient information
that will help define their vision goals• Age• Occupational Activities• Leisure Activities• Nighttime Activities• Spectacle Use Expectations• Night Driving• Obsessive/perfectionists • Demanding• Anxious• Unrealistic 80
80
PreparethePatientfortheBusySurgicalEnvironment• Review treatment options based on the patient’s situation• Do not make assumptions about financial situation• Explain the possibility of visual complications with each option• Address any questions the patient or family members may
have
81
81
Co-managementrelationship
• Ensure that there is a documented relationship established to co-manage any patient with a surgeon
• Your surgeon should be able to provide you with the documentation
82
82
PARTII:Clinical
Cases:
Post-OpSurprises
83
Patient#1
• 84 year old female• Extremely anxious about surgery• Desires UCDVA • MRX OD: +1.75 +0.75 x 015 (20/40)• W OD: +1.00 +0.75 x 006
84
10/15/19
15
Topographies
~1.40 D aligned around 40°
85
~2.25 to 2.50 D aligned 28° to 34°
86
BarrettToric Calculation
Implanted SN6AT5 21.0 @ 29°
87
Patient#1• POM1: right eye
• UCDVA 20/30• MRx: -050 +0.75 x 35 à 20/20 easy
88
Patient#1• POM1: right eye
• UCDVA 20/30• MRx: -050 +0.75 x 35 à 20/20 easy
• UNDERCORRECTED within SIMILAR axis• Plan: single 35° manual LRI at 035 degrees
89
Patient#1
à POW 1 s/p LRI: 20/20 -1 and HAPPY
90
10/15/19
16
Separate videoexample:Single40°@172degrees
91
Patient#2
• 76 yo AAM, desires UCDVA• MRx:
• OD: -1.50 +1.50 x170 (20/30)• OS: -0.75 +1.50 x175 (20/40)
• 2-3+ NSC ou• ERM OS, OD normal
92
Patient#2
93
Patient#2• OS first: POW 1 20/25 (-0.25 +0.25 x 165) • OD: Implanted T4 19.0 @ 175 degrees
• POM 1 OD: • UCDVA 20/60+• MRX: -0.75 + 1.50 x 150
94
Patient#2:Post-opAtlas
95
Patient#2
• Toric IOL aligned at 033 degrees• Options:
• AK’s• LASIK/PRK• Rotate the IOL• IOL exchange
96
10/15/19
17
astigmatismfix.com(Drs. John Berdahl and David Hardten)
97
Toric IOLReposition
98
Patient#3
• 61 yo WF• OD: 3.53 D @ 085
• AL 24.46• -5.00 +3.50 x090
99
Patient#3
100
Patient#3• Implanted T7 (~3.00D)• POM 1: -0.75 + 1.50 x 045• Huh????• Those with greater WTR anterior corneal astigmatism will
have great amounts of posterior WTR astigmatism, but amount is uncertain
101
Patient#3
• Correctly aligned at 090 degrees• Overcorrected or undercorrected?• Options?
• AK’s• IOL exchange• LASIK/PRK• Rotate the IOL
102
10/15/19
18
www.astigmatismfix.com(Drs. John Berdahl and David Hardten)
103
CLINICALPEARL
• If the post-op refractive axis changes significantly (oblique to 90 degrees away) and the IOL is aligned correctly, more than likely an OVERCORRECTIONhas occurred• Options:
• LRI, LVC or IOL reposition to weaken effect of toricIOL
104
CASE4
• 71 yo WM• PMHx: ALS, wheelchair bound, cognition fully intact,
desires spectacle independence• MRx:
• OD +0.25 +0.75 x 010 (20/30)• OS +0.50 +1.25 x 180 (20/40)
105 106
CASE4
• Plan: single 45 degree FLAC at 010 degrees
107
CASE4
• Plan: single 45 degree FLAC at 010 degrees
• POW 1: • UCDVA: 20/80• MRx: OS -0.75 + 1.50 x 150 (20/30+2)
108
10/15/19
19
CASE4:POW2topography
Sim K’s: 1.23 D @ 150°
109
CASE4:POW2topography
110
Patient:ManagementOptions
• Pooling within 45 degree AK causing ~1.75D flattening effect àslight gaping
• Changed meridian• Patient c/o slight fluctuations in vision• No discomfort
• How to proceed?
111
CASE4:POW7s/pBCL:UNCHANGEDFOCALGAPING
Sim K’s: 1.49 D @ 149°
112
What would you do for this patient?
113
CASE4
• At POM 2.5 àproceeded with IOL exchange for a T4 IOL, aligned at 150
• POW 1 OS à• UCDVA 20/25• OS -0.25 + 0.25 x 085
114