pre-construction notification (pcn) form union june 18... · pre-construction notification (pcn)...

of 11

Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form

A. Applicant Information

1. Processing

1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps: Section 404 Permit Section 10 Permit

1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 13 33 or General Permit (GP) number:

1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? Yes No

1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):

401 Water Quality Certification – Regular Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit

401 Water Quality Certification – Express Riparian Buffer Authorization

1e. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?

For the record only for DWQ 401 Certification:

Yes No

For the record only for Corps Permit: Yes No

1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program.

Yes No

1g. Is the project located in any of NC’s twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1h below.

Yes No

1h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? Yes No

2. Project Information

2a. Name of project: Replacement of Bridge No. 72 over Chinkapin Creek on NC 200.

2b. County: Union

2c. Nearest municipality / town: Fairview

2d. Subdivision name: not applicable

2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no: B-5134

3. Owner Information

3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: North Carolina Department of Transportation

3b. Deed Book and Page No. not applicable

3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if applicable): not applicable

3d. Street address: 1 South Wilmington Street

3e. City, state, zip: Raleigh, NC 27601

3f. Telephone no.: (919) 707-6157

3g. Fax no.: (919) 431-2002

3h. Email address: [email protected]

Office Use Only:

Corps action ID no. _____________

DWQ project no. _______________

Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008

of 11

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)

4a. Applicant is: Agent Other, specify:

4b. Name: not applicable

4c. Business name (if applicable):

4d. Street address:

4e. City, state, zip:

4f. Telephone no.:

4g. Fax no.:

4h. Email address:

5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)

5a. Name: not applicable

5b. Business name (if applicable):

5c. Street address:

5d. City, state, zip:

5e. Telephone no.:

5f. Fax no.:

5g. Email address:

of 11 PCN Form – Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

B. Project Information and Prior Project History

1. Property Identification

1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): not applicable

1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 35.518 Longitude: - 80.4962 (DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)

1c. Property size: 1.26 acres

2. Surface Waters

2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to proposed project: Chinkapin Creek

2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: WS-III

2c. River basin: Yadkin-Pee Dee

3. Project Description

3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application:

Mixed use of agricultural, forested & rural low density residential.

3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:

1.2

3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 120

3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project: To replace a structurally deficient and functionally obsolete bridge.

3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: Replacement of bridge number 72, a 2 span, 47' structure, with a single span, 100' structure, over Chinkapin Creek on NC 200. Cranes, backhoes, excavators will be used.

4. Jurisdictional Determinations

4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property / project (including all prior phases) in the past? Comments:

Yes No Unknown

4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made? Preliminary Final

4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Name (if known): Mulkey/ Steven W. Lund

Agency/Consultant Company: Mulkey Other:

4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation. December 8, 2009.

5. Project History

5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past? Yes No Unknown

5b. If yes, explain in detail according to “help file” instructions.

6. Future Project Plans

6a. Is this a phased project? Yes No

6b. If yes, explain.


C. Proposed Impacts Inventory

1. Impacts Summary

1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):

Wetlands Streams - tributaries Buffers

Open Waters Pond Construction

2. Wetland Impacts If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted. 2a.

Wetland impact number –

Permanent (P) or Temporary (T)

2b. Type of impact

2c. Type of wetland

(if known)

2d. Forested

2e. Type of jurisdiction (Corps - 404, 10

DWQ – non-404, other)

2f. Area of impact

(acres)

W1 P T Yes No

Corps DWQ

W2 P T Yes No

Corps DWQ

W3 P T Yes No

Corps DWQ

W4 P T Yes No

Corps DWQ

W5 P T Yes No

Corps DWQ

2g. Total wetland impacts

2h. Comments:

3. Stream Impacts If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this question for all stream sites impacted.

3a. Stream impact

number -Permanent (P) or

Temporary (T)

3b. Type of impact

3c. Stream name

3d. Perennial (PER) or

intermittent (INT)?

3e. Type of

jurisdiction (Corps - 404, 10 DWQ – non-404,

other)

3f. Average stream width (feet)

3g. Impact length (linear feet)

S1 P T Bank Stabilization Chinkapin Creek

PER INT

Corps DWQ

17.7' * 60

S2 P T Causeway 1 Chinkapin Creek PER INT

Corps DWQ

17.7' * 29

(0.02 acre)

S1 P T Causeway 2 Chinkapin Creek PER INT

Corps DWQ

17.7' * 29

(<0.01 acre)

S4 P T PER INT

Corps DWQ

3h. Total stream and tributary impacts

60' Permanent 58' (0.03 ac) Temporary

3i. Comments: * This stream is unnaturally wide at the road crossing due to the bridge's center bent and the skew of the crossing. The average natural stream width upstream and downstream of the bridge is 17.7'.

of 11

4. Open Water Impacts

If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below. 4a.

Open water impact number – Permanent (P) or

Temporary (T)

4b. Name of

waterbody (if applicable)

4c.

Type of impact

4d.

Waterbody type

4e. Area of impact (acres)

O1 P T

O2 P T

O3 P T

O4 P T

4f. Total open water impacts

4g. Comments:

5. Pond or Lake Construction

If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below. 5a. Pond ID number

5b.

Proposed use or purpose of pond

5c. Wetland Impacts (acres)

5d. Stream Impacts (feet)

5e. Upland (acres)

Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled

Excavated

Flooded

P1

P2

5f. Total

5g. Comments:

5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?

Yes No If yes, permit ID no:

5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):

5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):

5k. Method of construction:

of 11

6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)

If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.

6a.

Project is in which protected basin? Neuse Tar-Pamlico Other: Catawba Randleman

6b. Buffer impact

number – Permanent (P) or

Temporary (T)

6c. Reason

for impact

6d.

Stream name

6e. Buffer mitigation required?

6f. Zone 1 impact (square

feet)

6g.

Zone 2 impact (square feet)

B1 P T Yes No

B2 P T Yes No

B3 P T Yes No

6h. Total buffer impacts

6i. Comments:


D. Impact Justification and Mitigation

1. Avoidance and Minimization

1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.

The existing 47' two-span bridge will be replaced with a 100' single-span bridge at the same location. Traffic will be maintained on an off-site detour during construction. As Chinkapin Creek is classified as WS-III, a hazardus spill basin will be constructed on the project. No deck drains will be used and all the bridge drainage will be captured and routed into the hazardous spill basin.

1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.

The project has a large mass- concrete pier directly in the center of Chinkapin Creek. This size and configuration of the bent is partially responsible for the unnatural over widening of the channel at the bridge crossing. The removal of this bent will require a temporary work pad to completely surround it, which will leave 9 feet of channel for approximately 1 month. The natural dimensions of Chinkapin creek upstream and downstream of the bridge averages to 17.7 feet. Therefore the temporary work pad will obstruct less than 50% of the natural channel. Once the center pier is removed, the first causeway will be removed and the second smaller causeway will be installed to remove the abutment. Once removal is complete, the banks will be stabilized with Class II rip-rap, and the new bridge will be constructed without permanent impact to Chinkapin Creek.

2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State

2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?

Yes No

2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): DWQ Corps

2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this project?

Mitigation bank

Payment to in-lieu fee program

Permittee Responsible Mitigation

3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank

3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:

3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity

of 11

3c. Comments:

4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Prog ram

4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. Yes

4b. Stream mitigation requested: 0 linear feet

The NCDOT does not propose mitigation for stream bank stabilization activities. Stabilizing the bank of a stream does not require fill in the stream bed and, therefore, under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, does not constitute Loss of Waters of the U.S. and is not subject to compensatory mitigation. Furthermore, the proposed bank stabilization activities are necessary to prevent erosion and sedimentation, i.e. preventing bank destabilization and minimizing impacts to the environment.

4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: warm cool cold

4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): n/a square feet

4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: 0 acres

4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: 0 acres

4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: 0 acres

4h. Comments:

5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitiga tion Plan

5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buff er Rules) – required by DWQ

6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires buffer mitigation?

Yes No

6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the amount of mitigation required.

Zone

6c. Reason for impact

6d. Total impact (square feet)

Multiplier

6e. Required mitigation

(square feet)

Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba)

Zone 2 1.5

6f. Total buffer mitigation required:

6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank, permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).

6h. Comments:


E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (re quired by DWQ)

1. Diffuse Flow Plan

1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules? Yes No

1b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.

Comments: Yes No

2. Stormwater Management Plan

2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? n/a

2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? Yes No

2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:

2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:

See attached Stormwater Management Plan.

2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? Certified Local Government DWQ Stormwater Program DWQ 401 Unit

3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review

3a. In which local government’s jurisdiction is this project? not applicable

3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs apply (check all that apply):

Phase II NSW USMP Water Supply Watershed Other:

3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been attached?

Yes No

4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review

4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply (check all that apply):

Coastal counties HQW ORW Session Law 2006-246 Other:

4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been attached? Yes No N/A

5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review

5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? Yes No N/A

5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? Yes No N/A


F. Supplementary Information

1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)

1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land? Yes No

1b. If you answered “yes” to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State (North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?

Yes No

1c. If you answered “yes” to the above, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.)

Comments: PCE Signed April 2012.

Yes No

2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)

2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?

Yes No

2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes No

2c. If you answered “yes” to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):

3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)

3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes No

3b. If you answered “yes” to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the most recent DWQ policy. If you answered “no,” provide a short narrative description.

Due to the minimal transportation impact resulting from this bridge replacement, this project will neither influence nearby land uses nor stimulate growth. Therefore, a detailed indirect or cumulative effects study will not be necessary.

4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)

4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.

not applicable

(Version 1.2; Released September 2011)

B-5134 County(ies): UNION Page 1 of 3

Project Type: Date:

Phone: Phone:

Email: Email:

County(ies):

CAMA County?

Design/Future: Existing:

Surrounding Land Use: Farmland and Residential0.10

9100

Project Built-Upon Area (ac.)

Proposed Project Existing Site

Project Length (lin. Miles or feet):

Buffer Rules in Effect

Project Description

None

No

None

NCDWQ Surface Water Classification for Primary Receiving Water

303(d) Impairments:

River Basin(s):

Primary Receiving Water:

Water Supply III (WS-III)

Other Stream Classification:

AMEC Environment & Infrastructure, Inc.

City/Town:

704-357-5599

Hydraulics Unit Address:

919-707-6755

UNION

ac.

General Project Narrative: The existing 47' two-span bridge (2-span RC slab widened with RC deck on I-beams) will be replaced with a 100' single-span 39" box-beam structure at the same location. Chinkapin Creek is classified as WS-III and a hazardous spill basin will be required. No deck drains have been proposed on the bridge structure and all bridge deck drainage will be captured in bridge drop inlets and routed to the hazardous spill basin and then be discharged to the stream bank in a lined channel.

Typical Cross Section Description:

References

4000Average Daily Traffic (veh/hr/day):

ac.

North Carolina Department of Transportation

Highway Stormwater Program STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN

FOR LINEAR ROADWAY PROJECTS

William S. Zerman

Bridge Replacement

Raleigh, NC 27610

General Project Information

Address:

4/11/2013

2801 Yorkmont Road, Suite 100

1020 Birch Ridge Drive, Century Center Building B Charlotte, NC 28208

Project/TIP No.:

NCDOT Contact:

Project No.: B-5134

Contractor / Designer:

[email protected]

Yadkin-Pee Dee

13-17-36-9-5-(0.7)

[email protected]

Proposed roadway consists of 2 12 ft travel lanes with 4 ft paved shoulders Existing roadway consists of 2-10 ft lanes with 5 ft unpaved shoulders.

N/A

NCDWQ Stream Index No.:

Supplemental:

NonePrimary:

Chinkapin Creek

W. T. BEST

G. E. BREW, P.E.

UNION COUNTY

BRIDGE NO. 72 ON NC 200 (MORGAN MILL ROAD)

OVER CHINKAPIN CREEK

GRADING, PAVING, DRAINAGE, AND STRUCTURE

25 50 10050

25 50 10050

5 10 2010

DHV

D

T

V

=

=

=

=

=

=

9100

10

55

%

%

MPH

ADT

ADT 2035

% *

DUAL 5%

DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARY PLANS

* TTST 5%

FUNC CLASS =

MAJOR COLLECTOR

0

0

0

PROFILE (HORIZONTAL)

42293.1.1 PE

42293.2.1 R/W & Util

PROJECT LENGTH

RIGHT OF WAY DATE:

LETTING DATE:

STATE STATE PROJECT REFERENCE NO.

STATE PROJ. NO. F. A. PROJ. NO. DESCRIPTION

NO.TOTALSHEETS

N.C.SHEET

1

DESIGN DATA Prepared in the Office of:DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA

SIGNATURE:

SIGNATURE:

P.E.

P.E.

DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS

PROJECT ENGINEER

PROJECT DESIGN ENGINEER

GRAPHIC SCALES

PLANS

PROFILE (VERTICAL)

HYDRAULICS ENGINEER

ENGINEER

ROADWAY DESIGN

LOCATION:

TYPE OF WORK:

09/08/99

B-5134DIVISION OF HIGHWAYSSTATE OF NORTH CAROLINA

0

00

See Sheet 1-A For Index of Sheets

1000 Birch Ridge Dr., Raleigh NC, 27610

CO

NT

RA

CT:

TIP P

ROJE

CT:

B-513

4

DE

PA

RT

ME

NT

OF TRANSPO

RT

ATIO

N

ST

A

TE

OF NORTHC

A

RO

LIN

A

LENGTH OF ROADWAY TIP PROJECT B-5134 = 0.076 MI

LENGTH OF STRUCTURE TIP PROJECT B-5134 = 0.019 MI

TOTAL LENGTH TIP PROJECT B-5134 = 0.095 MI

4

NC 200 (MORGAN MILL RD.)C

HIN

KAPIN

CREE

K

CREEK

CHIN

KAPIN

-L- Sta. 18+00.00

End TIP Project B-5134-L- Sta. 13+00.00

Begin TIP Project B-5134

(200

UnionvillePop. 7,755

Sincerity R

d

Old C

am

den R

d

Rilla H

amilto

n R

d

Baucom Rd

New Sal

em Rd

(200

Morg

an Mill Rd

Morg

an Mill Rd

Olive Branch Rd

DETOUR

(200

47852013

11

70

THIS PROJECT IS WITHIN THE MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES OF UNIONVILLE

REGIONAL TIER

2012 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS

OCTOBER 23, 2012

Bridge #72

VICINITY MAP

End Project

Begin Project

SR 1636

SR 1634SR 1697

SR 1681

SR 1673

SR 1633

SR 1627

SR 1628

SR 1681

SR 1006

SR 1006

SR 1758

SR 1630

SR 2728

SR 1626

SR 1504SR 2720

SR 1687

SR 1620

SR 1627

SR 1635

TO MONROE

TO STANFIELD

-L-

Begin Bridge

-L- Sta. 14+57.70

End Bridge

-L- Sta. 15+60.30

BRSTP - 0200(2)

BRSTP - 0200(2)

MARCH 18, 2014

WETLAND AND SURFACE WATER IMPACTS PERMIT

SHEET 1 OF 5

PERMIT DRAWING

04/17/2013

B-513

4_

TS

H.D

GN

shir

shant.s

har

ma

NSRS

2007

NAD 83/

15

20

-L-

-L-

TB

TB

TB

TB

TB

TB

TB

TB

RETAIN 24" CMP

BENCHES & SLOPESON FLOODPLAINCLASS II RIP RAP

SG

EXIST. DITCH FLOW (TYP.)EXIST. DITCH FLOW (TYP.)

EXIST. DITCH FLOW (TYP.)

1

2

DETAIL B

GRADE TO DRAIN

F.S.

SPILL BASIN

HAZARDOUS

27'x87'x2.5'

DETAIL D

WITH V DITCH. MIN. BERM ELEV 494.5.

CONNECT EXISTING DITCH TO HSB

FROM STA. 13+06 TO STA. 13+51 RTC Existing Ditch: 12+45 RT

LATERAL BASE DITCH

DETAIL A

Type of Liner=Class B Rip-Rap

FROM -L- STA.13+17 TO STA.14+88 LT

FROM STA. 13+45 TO STA. 14+32 RT

DETAIL C

HAZARDOUS SPILLBASIN

@ ELEV. 493.5 w/ 1 FT. FREEBOARDTOTAL CAPACITY PROVIDED: 1,733 cfTOTAL CAPACITY REQUIRED: 1,688 cf

2GI

2GI

( Not to Scale)

RIP RAP AT EMBANKMENT

DETAIL 1

10'min.

1.0'min.

SEE DETAIL 1RIPRAP AT EMBANKMENT

Grade

Ditch

GEOTEXTILEOF CLASS B, 31 SY OFON V DITCH, 16 TONSCLASS II RIPRAP

15"

FROM STA 14+77.30 TO 14+83.80 RT

GEOTEXTILE

15" RCP

CONC

24" CMP

3 SBW

66" CHL

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

#072

NC 200 MORGAN MILL ROAD 24' BST

NC 200 MORGAN MILL ROAD 24' B

ST

CHIN

KAPIN CREE

K

CHIN

KAPIN

CR

EE

K

PID=DL3813

UNION-HM40

MODERNIZATION STATION

NGS HEIGHT

SS

GRIFFIN RAYMOND III, LLC

DB 4088 PG 868

DB 302 PG 395

NANCY B. GRIFFIN

DB 4145 PG 403

NANCY B. MORRISON

DB 302 PG 675

DB 475 PG 675

ANN MILLS TOMBERLINWILLIAM ELLISON TOMBERLIN


DB 4088 PG 868

N 29°20'31" E

170.00'

N 60°3

8'0

7" W

230.9

2'

N 36°2

6'5

8"

W505.6

5'

N 44°4

9'5

9" W

117.4

4'

N 07

°54'31" E

72.0

6'

S 18°40'

27" W

166.13'

S 09°45'59" E

78.98'

S 03

°46'

01" W

102.03'

S 10°

17'31" W

129.94'

S 22°5

0'5

9" E

143.5

6'

N 67°16'31" E

123.11'

N 86°2

3'0

1" E

139.8

6'

S 27°2

8'16"

E

271.10'

N 23°24'01"

E

113.51'

N 13°23'59"

W

218.0

9'

N 13°12'29"

W

174.0

9'

60.0

0'

EXISTING R/W

EXISTING R/W

60.0

0'

EXISTING R/W

EXISTING R/W

MTL

MTL

22' BS

T

13'

GR

BM#1

( LAKE TWITTY )CITY OF MONROE

DB 240 PG 210

DB 237 PG 279


DB 240 PG 210

DB 237 PG 279

CAROL P. BAUCOMJERRY LANE BAUCOM

2" P

VC

2" PVC

INNER DUCTINNER DUCT

UN

K SIZ

E

&

TY

PE

2GI

2GI

#072

MTL

CONC HAND RAIL

CONC WHEEL GUARD

CONC WW & HW


8/17/99

B-5134 02

SHEET 2 OF 5

PERMIT DRAWING

RE

VISIO

NS

HYDRAULICSROADWAY DESIGN

ENGINEER ENGINEER

R/W SHEET NO.

SHEET NO.PROJECT REFERENCE NO.


INCOMPLETE PLANSDO NOT USE FOR R/W ACQUISITION

NAD 83/ N

SRS

2007

INSET FOR IMPACT AREAS

04/17/2013

Plan

Sheet 1.D

GN

shirshant.s

har

ma

SURFACE WATER

DENOTES IMPACTS IN

IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER

DENOTES TEMPORARY

F

F

F

F

F

F

F

F

F

F

F

F

F

F

F

F

485

485

485

485

486

486

486

486

486

486

486

487

487

487

487

487

487

487

487

488

488

488

488

488

488

488

488

489

489

489

489

489

489

489

489

489

490

490

490

490

490

490

490

490

490

490

491

491

491

491

491

491

491

491

491

491

491

492

492

492

492

492

492

492

492

492

492

492

492

492

492

492

492

492

492

492

492

492

492

492

492

493

493

493

493

493

493

493

493

493

493

493

493

493

493

493

494

494

494

49449

4

494

494

494

494

494

494

494

495

495

495

495

495

495

495

495

496

496

496

496

496

496

496

496

496

497

497

497

498

498

498

499

500

15" RCP

CONC

24" CMP

3 SBW

66" CHL

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

#072

NC 200 MORGAN MILL ROAD 24' BST

NC 200 MORGAN MILL ROAD 24' B

ST

CHIN

KAPIN CREE

K

CHIN

KAPIN

CR

EE

K

PID=DL3813

UNION-HM40

MODERNIZATION STATION

NGS HEIGHT

SS


DB 4088 PG 868

DB 302 PG 395

NANCY B. GRIFFIN

DB 4145 PG 403

NANCY B. MORRISON

DB 302 PG 675

DB 475 PG 675

ANN MILLS TOMBERLINWILLIAM ELLISON TOMBERLIN


DB 4088 PG 868

N 29°20'31" E

170.00'

N 60°3

8'0

7" W

230.9

2'

N 36°2

6'5

8"

W505.6

5'

N 44°4

9'5

9" W

117.4

4'

N 07

°54'31" E

72.0

6'

S 18°40'

27" W

166.13'

S 09°45'59" E

78.98'

S 03

°46'

01" W

102.03'

S 10°

17'31" W

129.94'

S 22°5

0'5

9" E

143.5

6'

N 67°16'31" E

123.11'

N 86°2

3'0

1" E

139.8

6'

S 27°2

8'16"

E

271.10'

N 23°24'01"

E

113.51'

N 13°23'59"

W

218.0

9'

N 13°12'29"

W

174.0

9'

60.0

0'

EXISTING R/W

EXISTING R/W

60.0

0'

EXISTING R/W

EXISTING R/W

MTL

MTL

22' BS

T

13'

GR

BM#1


DB 240 PG 210

DB 237 PG 279


DB 240 PG 210

DB 237 PG 279

CAROL P. BAUCOMJERRY LANE BAUCOM

2" P

VC

2" PVC

INNER DUCTINNER DUCT

UN

K SIZ

E

&

TY

PE

15

20

-L-

-L-

TB

TB

TB

TB

TB

TB

TB

TB

RETAIN 24" CMP


21

2

SG

EXIST. DITCH FLOW (TYP.)EXIST. DITCH FLOW (TYP.)

EXIST. DITCH FLOW (TYP.)

1

2

13

DETAIL B

GRADE TO DRAIN

F.S.

SPILL BASIN

HAZARDOUS

27'x87'x2.5'

DETAIL D

WITH V DITCH. MIN. BERM ELEV 494.5.

CONNECT EXISTING DITCH TO HSB

FROM STA. 13+06 TO STA. 13+51 RTC Existing Ditch: 12+45 RT

LATERAL BASE DITCH

DETAIL A

Type of Liner=Class B Rip-Rap

FROM -L- STA.13+17 TO STA.14+88 LT

FROM STA. 13+45 TO STA. 14+32 RT

DETAIL C

HAZARDOUS SPILLBASIN

@ ELEV. 493.5 w/ 1 FT. FREEBOARDTOTAL CAPACITY PROVIDED: 1,733 cfTOTAL CAPACITY REQUIRED: 1,688 cf

2GI

2GI

( Not to Scale)

RIP RAP AT EMBANKMENT

DETAIL 1

10'min.

1.0'min.

SEE DETAIL 1RIPRAP AT EMBANKMENT

Grade

Ditch

GEOTEXTILEOF CLASS B, 31 SY OFON V DITCH, 16 TONSCLASS II RIPRAP

15"

FROM STA 14+77.30 TO 14+83.80 RT

GEOTEXTILE

152GI

2GI

#072

MTL

CONC HAND RAIL

CONC WHEEL GUARD

CONC WW & HW


8/17/99

B-5134 02

SURFACE WATER

DENOTES IMPACTS IN

SHEET 3 OF 5

PERMIT DRAWING

RE

VISIO

NS

HYDRAULICSROADWAY DESIGN

ENGINEER ENGINEER

R/W SHEET NO.

SHEET NO.PROJECT REFERENCE NO.

NAD 83/ N

SRS

2007

IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER

DENOTES TEMPORARY

INSET FOR IMPACT AREAS

04/17/2013

Plan

Sheet 2.D

GN

shirshant.s

har

ma


INCOMPLETE PLANSDO NOT USE FOR R/W ACQUISITION

F

F

F

F

F

F

F

F

F

F

F

F

F

F

F

F

15+5014+50 15+0014+00

480

490

500

510

SECTION ALONG -L-

GRADE DATA

VC=230'

EL. 499.33

PI = 16+85.00 -L-

+4.5043%

+0.7097%

PLAN(PILES NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY)

B-5134

UNION

15+09.00 -L-

BETWEEN SR 1627 AND SR 1608(MORGAN MILL ROAD)

CHINKAPIN CREEK ON NC 200FOR BRIDGE OVER

1'-0"

(TYP.)

BOTTOM OF CAP

EL. 489.44

BOTTOM OF CAP

EL. 490.14

J.D. HAWK 8/12

STA. 14+57.70 -L-

(TYP.)

EXCAVATION

STRUCTURE

UNCLASSIFIED

(TYP.)

STRUCTURE

EXISTING

LINE

NATURAL GROUND

APPROXIMATEEL. 496.0|

EL. 485.0|

EL. 484.0|

EL. 485.0|

EL. 497.0|

EL. 496.0|

EL. 490.0|

EL. 496.0|

FIXFIX

(TYP.)

RIP RAP

CLASS II

STA. 15+60.30 -L-

(TYP.)

STRUCTURE

EXISTING

BRIDGE IDENTITY

STA. 15+09.00 -L-

-L-

W.P. #1

STA. 14+57.70 -L-

W.P. #2

STA. 15+60.30 -L-

BEGIN APPROACH SLAB

STA. 14+33.85 -L-

END APPROACH SLAB

STA. 15+84.15 -L-

FACE

FILL FACE

FILL

102'-7‚" (FILL FACE TO FILL FACE)

F.A. PROJECT No. BRSTP-0200(2)

RIP RAP

CLASS II

RIP RAP

CLASS II

CHI

NK

API

N

CR

EE

K

W. S. EL. 496.7

100YR

(TYP.)

NORMAL TO CAP

SLOPE 2:1

(TYP.)

120°-00'-00"

D.R. SMITH 9/12

GRADE POINT EL. 497.72

FILL FACE END BENT 1

(TYP.)

STEEL PILES

GRADE POINT EL. 498.45

FILL FACE END BENT 2

51'-3†"51'-3†"

REPLACES BRIDGE #72

(SECTIONS AT END BENTS ARE TAKEN AT RIGHT ANGLES)

BENCH EL. 490.3|

FLOOD PLAIN

BENCH EL. 490.8|

FLOOD PLAIN

STREAM BED

SLOPE

1•: 1

ROCK CAUSEWAY

DETAILS OF TEMPORARY

RIP RAP

CLASS II

W. S. EL. 487.0

NORMAL

(4/13/12)

2'-

0"

RIP RAP

CLASS B

MI

N.

1'-

0"

SURFACE EL. 487.0

NORMAL WATER

EL. 489.0

TOP OF CAUSEWAY

BE IN PLACE AT A TIME

NOTE: ONLY 1 CAUSEWAY MAY

GENERAL DRAWING

TS TSIMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER

DENOTES TEMPORARY

SCALE: 1"=20'NO. NO.BY: BY:DATE: DATE:

REVISIONS SHEET NO.

TOTALSHEETS

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA

RALEIGH

STATION:

COUNTY

PROJECT NO.

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

12

3

4

SHEET 1 OF 2

DRAWN BY :

CHECKED BY :

DATE :

DATE :

04/17/2013

shirshant.sharma

Profile Sheet 1.DGN

SHEET 4 OF 5

PERMIT DRAWING

ROCK CAUSEWAY 1

TEMPORARY

ROCK CAUSEWAY 2

TEMPORARY

ROCK CAUSEWAY 1

TEMPORARY

ROCK CAUSEWAY 2

TEMPORARY

Hand Existing Existing Permanent Temp. Excavation Mechanized Clearing Permanent Temp. Channel Channel Natural

Site Station Structure Fill In Fill In in Clearing in SW SW Impacts Impacts StreamNo. (From/To) Size / Type Wetlands Wetlands Wetlands in Wetlands Wetlands impacts impacts Permanent Temp. Design

(ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ft) (ft) (ft) 14+84.5/15+15.23 Causeway 1 0.02 29 15+15.23/15+31.30 Causeway 2 < 0.01 29 14+83 Bank Stabilization 60

TOTALS*: 0.03 60 58 0

*Rounded totals are sum of actual impacts

NOTES:

Revised 4/09/13 SHEET 5 OF 5

WETLAND PERMIT IMPACT SUMMARYWETLAND IMPACTS SURFACE WATER IMPACTS

UNION COUNTY

BRIDGE 890072 (B-5134) ON NC 200

OVER CHINKAPIN CREEK

Note: The causeways are necessary for the removal of the existing pier and will be in place for approximately one month. Only one of the two causeways will be in place at any given time. The largest Causeway blocks out approximately 44% of the channel below the normal water surface elevation. The percentage is based on a natural channel width of about 17 feet upstream and downstream and takes into account tha the channel is unnaturally widened through the bridge opening.

Note that the temporary linear impacts for Causeway #1, Causeway #2, and the removal of the existing end bents and wingwalls all impact the same linear portion of Chinkapin Creek at different times and are not additive.

NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS

41387

Existing Edge of Pavement

Existing Curb

Proposed Slope Stakes Cut

Proposed Slope Stakes Fill

Existing Metal Guardrail

Existing Cable Guiderail

Proposed Guardrail

Equality Symbol

Pavement Removal

Baseline Control Point

RIGHT OF WAY:

Existing Right of Way Marker

Existing Right of Way Line

h

Existing Control of Access

Proposed Control of Access

Proposed Right of Way Line

C

F

Existing Easement Line

Proposed Temporary Construction Easement

Proposed Temporary Drainage Easement

Proposed Permanent Drainage Easement

Proposed Permanent Utility Easement

HYDROLOGY:

Stream or Body of Water

Hydro, Pool or Reservoir

Flow Arrow

Disappearing Stream

Spring

;

z

v

W

KProposed Lateral, Tail, Head Ditch

False Sump

Proposed Cable Guiderail

MAJOR:

Bridge, Tunnel or Box Culvert

Bridge Wing Wall, Head Wall and End Wall

MINOR:

Head and End Wall

Pipe Culvert

Footbridge

Paved Ditch Gutter

UTILITIES:

ROADS AND RELATED FEATURES:

Existing Power Pole

Proposed Power Pole

P

U/G Power Cable Hand Hole

Power Manhole

Power Line Tower

Power Transformer

Existing Joint Use Pole

Proposed Joint Use Pole

Existing Telephone Pole

Proposed Telephone Pole

Telephone Manhole

Telephone Booth

Telephone Pedestal

U/G Telephone Cable Hand Hole

R

}

T

p

Q

l

e

]

/

b

H-Frame Pole O O

POWER:

TELEPHONE:

Telephone Cell Tower

Recorded U/G Power Line

Recorded U/G Telephone Cable

Designated U/G Telephone Cable (S.U.E.*)

Recorded U/G Telephone Conduit

Designated U/G Telephone Conduit (S.U.E.*)

Recorded U/G Fiber Optics Cable

WATER:

Water Manhole

Water Meter

Water Valve

Water Hydrant

Recorded U/G Water Line

4

I

H

a

TV:

TV Satellite Dish

TV Pedestal

TV Tower

U/G TV Cable Hand Hole

Recorded U/G TV Cable

Recorded U/G Fiber Optic Cable

Designated U/G Fiber Optic Cable (S.U.E.*)

r

|

I]

GAS:

Gas Valve

Gas Meter

Recorded U/G Gas Line

n

c

SANITARY SEWER:

Sanitary Sewer Manhole

Sanitary Sewer Cleanout

U/G Sanitary Sewer Line

Recorded SS Forced Main Line

Designated SS Forced Main Line (S.U.E.*)

d

o

A/G Water

Above Ground Gas LineA/G Gas

Above Ground Water Line

Above Ground Sanitary Sewer A/G Sanitary Sewer

MISCELLANEOUS:

Utility Pole OF

S3

Utility Pole with Base

Utility Located Object

Utility Traffic Signal Box

Utility Unknown U/G Line

?

CONC

CONC WW

v

vDrainage Box: Catch Basin, DI or JB

Storm Sewer

Storm Sewer Manhole m

U/G Tank; Water, Gas, Oil

A/G Tank; Water, Gas, Oil

BOUNDARIES AND PROPERTY:

State Line

County Line

Township Line

City Line

Reservation Line

Property Line

Existing Iron Pin

Property Corner

Property Monument

Existing Fence Line

Proposed Woven Wire Fence

Proposed Chain Link Fence

Proposed Barbed Wire Fence

g

F

123

Existing Wetland Boundary

Proposed Wetland Boundary

Existing Endangered Animal Boundary

Existing Endangered Plant Boundary

BUILDINGS AND OTHER CULTURE:

Area Outline

Gas Pump Vent or U/G Tank Cap

Church

School

Dam

Sign

Small Mine

Well

V

M

WW

S

x

Foundation

S

Building

y

y

VEGETATION:

Single Tree X

Y

Vineyard

Single Shrub

Hedge

Woods Line

Orchard

Vineyard

RAILROADS:

Standard Gauge

RR Signal Milepost

Switch

RR Abandoned

RR Dismantled

S

FLOW

Designated U/G Power Line (S.U.E.*)

Designated U/G Fiber Optics Cable (S.U.E.*)

Designated U/G Water Line (S.U.E.*)

Designated U/G TV Cable (S.U.E.*)

Designated U/G Gas Line (S.U.E.*)

U/G Test Hole (S.U.E.*)

*S.U.E. = Subsurface Utility Engineering

WLB

EIP

B

ECM

CONC HW

CB

CSX TRANSPORTATION

MILEPOST 35

SWITCH

Cemetery

EXISTING STRUCTURES:

Parcel / Sequence Number

E

AATUR

End of Information E.O.I.

Note: Not to ScaleSHEET NO.PROJECT REFERENCE NO.

1-BB-5134

Abandoned According to Utility Records

WLB

EAB

EPB

RW

RW

RW

CA

E

TDE

PDE

PUE

S

P

P

T

T

TC

TC

T FO

T FO

W

W

TV

TV

TV FO

TV FO

G

G

SS

FSS

FSS

?UTL

Jurisdictional Stream JS

04/16/11

Buffer Zone 1

Buffer Zone 2

BZ 1

BZ 2

Wetland

Proposed Permanent Easement with

Iron Pin and Cap Marker

Proposed Temporary Utility Easement TUE

Iron Pin and Cap Marker

Proposed Right of Way Line with

DUEProposed Permanent Drainage / Utility Easement

AUEProposed Aerial Utility Easement

CRProposed Curb Ramp

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINADIVISION OF HIGHWAYS

CONVENTIONAL PLAN SHEET SYMBOLS

Underground Storage Tank, Approx. Loc.

Geoenvironmental Boring

UST

Known Soil Contamination: Area or Site

Potential Soil Contamination: Area or Site

Concrete or Granite R/W Marker

Proposed Right of Way Line with

CA Concrete C/A Marker

Proposed Control of Access Line with

pre-construction notification (pcn) form union june 18... · pre-construction notification (pcn)...

Documents