pragmatic selection of larval mosquito diets for insectary rearing … · 2019. 8. 19. · 1...

1 Pragmatic selection of larval mosquito diets for

2 insectary rearing of Anopheles gambiae and

3 Aedes aegypti

4

5 Short title: Larval mosquito diets for An. gambiae and Ae. aegypti

6

7 Mark Q. Benedict1 *, Catherine M. Hunt1, Michael G. Vella2, Kasandra M. Gonzalez2, Ellen M.

8 Dotson1, C. Matilda Collins3

9 1 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria,

10 Entomology Branch, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America

11 2 Frontier Scientific Services, Newark, Delaware, United States of America

12 3 Centre for Environmental Policy, Imperial College London, United Kingdom

13 * Corresponding author

14 Email: [email protected]

15

made available for use under a CC0 license. certified by peer review) is the author/funder. This article is a US Government work. It is not subject to copyright under 17 USC 105 and is also

The copyright holder for this preprint (which was notthis version posted August 19, 2019. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/740142doi: bioRxiv preprint

https://doi.org/10.1101/740142

16 Abstract

17 Larval mosquitoes are aquatic omnivorous scavengers which scrape food from submerged

18 surfaces and collect suspended food particles with their mouth brushes. The composition of

19 diets that have been used in insectaries varies widely though necessarily provides sufficient

20 nutrition to allow colonies to be maintained. Issues such as cost, availability and experience

21 influence which diet is selected. One component of larval diets, essential fatty acids, appears to

22 be necessary for normal flight though deficiencies may not be evident in laboratory cages and

23 are likely more important when mosquitoes are reared for release into the field in e.g. mark-

24 release-recapture and genetic control activities.

25 In this study, four diets were compared for rearing Anopheles gambiae and Aedes aegypti, all of

26 which provide these essential fatty acids. Two diets were custom formulations specifically

27 designed for mosquitoes (Damiens) and two were commercially available fish foods: Doctors

28 Foster and Smith Koi Staple Diet and TetraMin Plus Flakes. Development rate, survival, dry

29 weight and adult longevity of mosquitoes reared with these four diets were measured. The

30 method of presentation of one diet, Koi pellets, was additionally fed in two forms, pellets or a

31 slurry, to determine any effect of food presentation on survival and development rate.

32 While various criteria might be selected to choose ‘the best’ food, the readily-available Koi

33 pellets resulted in development rates and adult longevity equal to the other diets, high survival

34 to the adult stage and, additionally, this is available at low cost.



https://doi.org/10.1101/740142

36 Introduction

37 Larval mosquitoes are omnivorous opportunistic aquatic feeders which collect and swallow

38 small particles, can chew larger particles and can scrape food off of submerged surfaces [1].

39 Laboratory culture of mosquitoes seldom attempts to replicate natural diets but usually consists

40 of a readily available material that experience has proven to allow consistent rearing. These

41 generally fall into two classes: simple mixtures of ingredients such as yeast and liver powder

42 that are formulated by the users or commercial formulations of complex composition including

43 foods such as fish-food flakes [2] or pellets [3], hog supplement [4], cereals and less commonly,

44 maize pollen and algae [5]. Many unusual ingredients such as guinea pig feces and hay infusion

45 are cited by Gerberg [6]. The diversity of ‘successful’ larval foods demonstrates that for many

46 purposes, there are numerous choices.

47 Commercially manufactured diets provide the advantages that the researcher does not need to

48 formulate the diet, can rely on the quality control measures employed by the manufacturer and

49 often, ready availability. Some disadvantages of complex commercial foods are that the

50 researcher has no control over the specific components of the diet which may change without

51 notice and that obtaining the same diet locally in different countries may be difficult.

52 Considerations for choosing a food are simple: It must promote the routine rearing of good

53 quality mosquitoes (however that is defined), be readily available, consistent in quality and

54 preferably inexpensive. A less apparent and seldom considered advantage is to choose a diet

55 that numerous laboratories can use to give some assurance of comparable results. If flight

56 testing, mating assays or release activities will be performed, it is necessary to provide essential

57 fatty acids [7].

58 This study determined, among four candidate larval diets for two frequently-reared disease

59 vector mosquitos, Anopheles gambiae Giles (Diptera: Culicidae) and Aedes aegypti Linnaeus



https://doi.org/10.1101/740142

60 (Diptera: Culicidae), which diet and feeding level resulted in the optimal performance for several

61 important life history traits such immature growth rate, survival, size and adult longevity. One of

62 these diets, TetraMin flakes, is widely used for both Anopheles and Aedes spp. We make a

63 recommendation for selection among these diets which also considers cost and availability.

64 Materials and Methods

65 Diet preparation

66 Four diets were prepared for comparisons; two of these were custom formulations of a diet

67 specifically designed for mosquitoes [8]. This diet consists of a 2:2:1 ratio (by weight) of bovine

68 liver powder, tuna meal and Vanderzant vitamin mix. One formulation was prepared at CDC in

69 Atlanta, GA using ‘Now’ brand liver powder (Bloomingdale, IL USA), tuna meal (AA Baits, Rock

70 Ferry, Birkenhead, UK) and Vanderzant vitamin mix (Bio-Serv, Flemington, NJ, USA). Large

71 particles were removed from the tuna meal and liver powder using a (600 ) standard sieve.

72 Clumps of vitamin mix were broken up manually but no further sieving was done because the

73 mix is soluble and the particle size allowed even mixing.

74 The other formulation of the Damiens diet was prepared by Frontier Scientific Services (Newark,

75 DE USA) using defatted, desiccated liver powder (product no. 1320; Frontier Scientific

76 Services), Vanderzant vitamin mix (product no. F8045, Frontier Scientific Services) and the

77 same lot of tuna meal as was used at CDC. In order to ensure particle size was small enough

78 for consumption by developing larvae, a milling and screening procedure was employed. A

79 significant source of oversized particulates was the tuna meal. Most large particles were

80 identified as scale and bone remnants from the manufacturers processing of the meal. The tuna

81 meal was processed in a top-feeding hammer mill (The Fitzpatrick Co., Toronto, Canada) with a

82 60-80 (177 mesh particle excluding screen. To ensure particles were milled to specification



https://doi.org/10.1101/740142

83 without complete exclusion of meal components, the material was passed through the hammer-

84 mill twice. The milled tuna meal was then mixed with the remaining ingredients in a bench-top

85 ‘Kitchen Aid’ bread mixer for 20 minutes. After mixing was complete, the final diet was hand

86 sifted through a 60 mesh (177 screen to eliminate any remaining oversized particulates.

87 The other two diets were commercially available fish foods: Doctors Foster and Smith Koi

88 Staple Diet (Rhinelander, WI USA) and TetraMin Plus Flakes (Tetra GmbH, Melle, Germany).

89 For fair comparison, both fish foods were ground to a similar size to the custom diets. Koi pellets

90 were ground in a Miracle Model MR-300 Electric Grain and Flour Mill (Danbury, CT USA)

91 followed by sieving in a 600 standard sieve and saving the particles that passed. The

92 TetraMin was ground in a Black and Decker ‘SmartGrind’ coffee grinder (Beachwood, OH USA)

93 after which it easily passed through a 600 sieve. These diet types will be identified as CDC,

94 Frontier, Koi, and TetraMin respectively.

95 The ground diets were mixed at 0.4, 0.8, 1.6 and 3.2 % w/v in type II water and stored in ca. 13

96 ml aliquots and frozen at -20C where they remained until being thawed in warm water

97 immediately before feedings. When 4 ml of the slurry was fed, these concentrations result in

98 feeding rates (levels) of 8, 16, 32 and 64 mg diet / dish / day. Hereafter we will usually refer to

99 the levels simply as e.g. 32 mg.

100 Mosquitoes

101 Anopheles gambiae mosquitoes were the ‘G3’ strain (MRA-112) obtained from the Malaria

102 Research and Reference Resource Center (MR4, BEI Resources, Manassas VA USA). Aedes

103 aegypti were the ‘New Orleans’ strain (NR-49160), also obtained from the MR4 and were in the

104 F16-F18 generations during experiments. A standard rearing water was made of 0.3 g of pond

105 salts (API, McLean, VA USA) per liter of type II purified water. Anopheles gambiae eggs were



https://doi.org/10.1101/740142

106 collected, held overnight on damp filter paper and placed in trays on the day of hatching. Aedes

107 aegypti eggs were hatched by placing egg papers in water under vacuum for 30 min. Hatching

108 embryos of both species were placed in 500 ml of water containing 5 intact Koi pellets for one

109 day before counting 80 larvae into 150 ml polystyrene Petri dishes (Item no. Z717231, Sigma-

110 Aldrich, St. Louis, MO USA).

111 Trial design

112 An orthogonal design was used; three dishes (replicates) for each of the four diets at all four

113 levels were established for both species. For these mosquitoes, it is not possible to determine

114 sex at the first larval instar and it was assumed that random aliquots would deliver a

115 representative sex ratio. Before counting larvae into Petri dishes, the empty dishes were

116 weighed to a tenth of a gram on a triple-beam balance (700/800 Series, Ohaus, Parsippany, NJ

117 USA) and labeled with their weight. On the day after hatching, 80 larvae were counted into the

118 dishes and rearing water was added until the net weight was 96 g. Then 4 ml of food was added

119 for an approximate total volume of 100 ml. The concentrations were selected to bracket a range

120 shown to allow maximal survival and development rate with Anopheles arabiensis [9]. Additional

121 diet was added on alternate days, prior to which the dishes were weighed and water was

122 removed (ca. 2-3 ml), to return the net weight to 96 g before 4 ml of diet slurry was added to

123 maintain an approximate total volume of 100 ml. Mosquitoes were reared in an environmental

124 room set at 27C and 70% relative humidity with a 12:12 light:dark cycle and 30 minutes of

125 dawn and dusk.

126 In this main experiment, in which all diets and levels were tested, pupae were counted and

127 collected daily, their sex determined and the pupae were then placed in individual plastic tubes

128 for eclosion. Tubes were checked for adults daily with up to five randomly selected adults from

129 each day of eclosion and sex being killed for dry weight measurements. Immature stage trials



https://doi.org/10.1101/740142

130 were generally terminated when there were no more larvae present except as noted for the 8

131 mg diet level with An. gambiae where observations of larval duration were terminated based on

132 a pragmatic decision on days 12 and 14 (Table 1).

133 Anopheles gambiae and Ae. aegypti differ in many characteristics including body size and

134 rearing tractability. Because of this, the two species have been analyzed separately. There are

135 also known differences in outcomes by sex within species and, where appropriate, parameter

136 estimates for each sex are calculated independently. Statistical analyses were performed using

137 R version 3.5.1 “Feather Spray” [10]

138 Inter-trial comparison of water temperature

139 Due to logistical limitations, it was not possible to perform all experiments concurrently. As a

140 result, five sequential trials in the same chambers contributed to the experiment overall. The

141 critical variable of water temperature was measured in three arbitrary dishes every two or three

142 days in the morning using a Sper Scientific Model 800005 thermocouple thermometer

143 (Scottsdale, AZ USA) equipped with a K type probe and overall means were compared using

144 Analysis of Variance.

145 Sex ratio

146 The sex of pupae arising from each treatment combination was observed and the ratio

147 estimated. Chi-square tests were used to determine whether the male:female ratio varied with

148 treatment or species.

149 Survival to eclosion

150 To determine the effect of the different diets and levels fed on the number of adults that eclosed,

151 Poisson-family generalized linear models (GLMs) using the diet level, diet type and their



https://doi.org/10.1101/740142

152 interaction were fit to the data. Model simplification by deletion tests used F-tests to estimate

153 influential effects as appropriate to the over-dispersion of these count data.

154 Proportion of pupae eclosing

155 The data that were analyzed resulted from the counts of the number of pupae that formed and

156 eclosion data. A weighted response variable that bound the number of pupae eclosing and the

157 number of pupae that did not was created. Binomial-family GLMs using the dose, food type

158 (both categorical, four levels) and their interactions were fit to these data. Model simplification

159 by deletion used F-tests to estimate important effects as appropriate to the over-dispersion

160 evident in the weighted proportion data.

161 Larva developmental rate

162 The number of days taken to complete larval development to pupation was analyzed to

163 determine effects on development rates. As the number of days to eclosion was an integer

164 value, chi-squared tests were used to estimate the influence on this time of interactions between

165 diet type and the amount of food provided as well as these as single effects. The relative

166 contribution of each factor is then reflected in the test statistic values.

167 Adult longevity estimation

168 The 32 mg diet level was chosen for assessing the influence of diet type on adult longevity

169 based on observed rapid development rate and high survival across all diet types reported in

170 the Results section. Pupae arising from these dishes were placed in aluminum-frame cages [11]

171 which were covered with one or two layers (in the case of Ae. aegypti) of gauze and provided

172 sugar water (10% w/v food grade sucrose, 0.1% w/v methylparaben in type II water) which was

173 changed weekly. There were three cages for each diet, each associated with a different larval



https://doi.org/10.1101/740142

174 replicate dish. All longevity measures were made concurrently. Mortality was usually checked

175 daily, though occasionally it was not observed on Saturdays. Kaplan-Meier objects were created

176 as response variables for the survival analyses and a Cox proportional hazards model was used

177 to identify effects of diet type on survival for each species and sex.

178 Measures of dry weight

179 Dry weight of adults was determined for all diet types and levels. After eclosion, adults were

180 transferred to glass scintillation vials, killed by freezing at -20C and dried in a drying oven at

181 60C overnight after which they were removed and the caps sealed until weighing. For each

182 diet/level combination, up to five individuals of each sex from each day of eclosion were

183 weighed using a Sartorius SuperMicro S4 balance (Bohemia, NY USA) when that number was

184 available. Weights are reported in micrograms.

185 The dry weight of mosquitos was a continuous response variable. As previously, diet type, level

186 and mosquito sex were all considered as categorical factors. All main effects and interactions

187 were tested by deletion from the maximal model. Effects that were either non-significant or

188 accounted for less than 1% of the variation in the data were excluded.

189 The influence of pellet vs. slurry

190 One food type, the Koi pellets, was used to estimate any influence of the form of presentation

191 and thus whether it is necessary to grind the food. Koi pellets were weighed on the SuperMicro

192 balance and the average weight and standard deviation of pellets calculated; 52.0 mg (n=14,

193 StDev 8.65). Two pellets (equivalent to 52 mg/dish/day) were fed on alternate days in parallel

194 with the day the 32 mg slurry was given. Larval survival (the number of larvae reaching

195 pupation) and larval duration (the number of days to pupation) were used as the measures for



https://doi.org/10.1101/740142

196 this comparison. Pupae were collected daily in the morning and their sex determined. All dishes

197 were new and there were three tests of each food form for both Ae. aegypti and An. gambiae.

198 Results

199 Inter-trial comparability of water temperature

200 The temperature was consistent among all trials of Ae. aegypti (F=1.03, d.f.= 2,72 p=0.36). The

201 average water temperature was 26.9C (n=75, StDev 0.45). The average temperature of all

202 An. gambiae trials was 27.0°C (n=45, StDev 0.33) but there was a slight, but significant,

203 variation in temperature between the trials (F=7.51, d.f.=1.43, p

Table 1: The number of An. gambiae immatures discarded at the end of the trial at the lowest diet level, 8mg.

Diet type Dish Day Discarded

A 47

B 28CDC

C

14

48

A 13

B 7Frontier

C

14

10

A 51

B 52Koi

C

12

47

A 63

B 66TetraMin

C

12

57

217

218 The responses of Ae. aegypti and An. gambiae to different diets and levels shared similarities in

219 pattern but had marked differences in absolute level (Fig 1). Aedes aegypti eclosion varied less

220 as a function of diet type and level and achieved higher numbers than did An. gambiae (for

221 model null deviance see Table 2). There was an interaction between diet type and level on the

222 number of Ae. aegypti males and females; this was largely driven by the two commercial foods,

223 Koi and TetraMin, having higher numbers at the lowest diet level than did the CDC or Frontier

224 diets.

225 Fig 1. The number of Ae. aegypti and An. gambiae female and male adults observed by

226 diet type and level. The dashed horizontal line indicates the expected number of females and

227 males assuming a 1:1 sex ratio and full survival. Error bars are the 95% CI of the mean.

228 Darkening shades of color represent the increasing diet levels of 8, 16, 32 and 64 mg.



https://doi.org/10.1101/740142

Table 2. Statistical summary of the influences on the number of male and female adults

formed with the proportion of the deviance explained (in parentheses) given as an indicator

of effect size (significant effects indicated in bold).

Ae. aegypti An. gambiae

Males Females Males Females

Model null deviance (47 d.f.)

86.77 201.09 689.35 669.89

Diet:Level F=5.11, d.f.= 9,32, p

237 Proportion of pupae eclosing

238 We anticipated that the likelihood of pupae that had formed then successfully eclosing might be

239 affected by the food type or level. For both sexes of Ae. aegypti there was an interaction

240 between diet type and level on the number of pupae eclosing to adults (Table 3); this was

241 largely driven by poor eclosion at low levels of the Frontier diet (Fig 2). In all other cases, if the

242 larvae reached the pupa stage, they were highly likely to become an adult.

243 Fig 2. Eclosion of pupae that formed by diet type and level. Error bars represent the 95%

244 CI. Darkening shades of color represent the increasing diet levels of 8, 16, 32 and 64 mg.

Table 3. Model summary statistics estimating the influence of diet type and level on

the number of male and female pupae eclosing to adults with the effect size

(proportion of the deviance explained) indicated in parentheses (significant effects

in bold).

Ae. aegypti An. gambiaeMales Females Males Females

Model null deviance

165.10 155.63 207.64 96.12

Diet:LevelF=3.33,

d.f.=9,32, p = 0.006 (0.35)

F=3.19, d.f.=9,32,

p=0.007 (0.33)

F=1.76, d.f.=8,25, p=0.14 (0.14)

F=1.15, d.f.= 8,26,

p=0.37 (0.14)

Diet F=1.14, d.f.=3,41, p=0.35 (0.07)

F=1.43, d.f.= 3,41, p=0.25,

(0.08)

F=4.31, d.f.=3,33, p=0.011(0.16)

F=4.53, d.f.= 3,34, p=0.009

(0.19)



https://doi.org/10.1101/740142

Level F=2.24 d.f.=3,41, p=0.10, (0.13)

F=2.51, d.f=3,41, p=0.07 (0.14)

F=10.10, d.f.=3,33,

p


Females Males Females Males

Interaction

Diet type:Level

2 = 37.46, df = 9,

p < 0.001

2 = 26.31,df = 9,

p < 0.002

2 = 19.28,df = 8,

p < 0.05

2 = 19.19,df = 6,

p < 0.01

Diet type2 = 12.77,

df = 3, p< 0.01

2 = 25.63,df = 3,

p0.05 in all cases). Overall, the median adult lifespan of Aedes aegypti males and females

274 was similar (Table 5). For females, there was no identifiable variation in longevity as a function



https://doi.org/10.1101/740142

275 of diet type (2=4.45, d.f.=3, p=0.22). There was variation in male longevity but CDC and Koi

276 led to longer-lived males (2=12.20, d.f.=3, p=0.007).

277

278 Anopheles gambiae females lived consistently longer than males (Table 5). For females, diet

279 type affected longevity with CDC and Koi leading to longer life (2=9.87, d.f.=3, p=0.02). There

280 was greater variation in male longevity but no diet-related variation was identified (2=5.80,

281 d.f.=3, p=0.12).

282

Table 5. Adult Longevity

Ae. aegypti

Females Males

Diet n Median (95% CI) n Median (95% CI)

CDC 55 51 (46-67) 80 59 (56-67)

Frontier 52 49 (35-67) 90 54 (51-61)

Koi 58 57 (53-63) 82 60 (57-63)

TetraMin 69 50 (31-68) 80 49 (44-53)

An. gambiae

Females Males

Diet n Median (95% CI) n Median (95% CI)

CDC 47 37 (25-39) 55 21 (14-26)

Frontier 57 32 (29-37) 62 29 (27-32)

Koi 53 37 (37-37) 48 20 (15-30)

TetraMin 66 30 (26-37) 56 24 (18-29)



https://doi.org/10.1101/740142

283 Dry weight

284 Aedes aegypti dry weight

285 A total of 787 Ae. aegypti females and 880 males were weighed. Aedes aegypti males weigh

286 less than females (p

Sex (factor) 1770.50 1,1659

Sex:Level 0.58 0.00

Minimal adequate model 35.78 15,770

315 female larvae fed pellets delayed pupation by a day (median values: Ae. aegypti 7:6,

316 An. gambiae 9:8 pellet vs. slurry respectively).

317 Discussion

318 In this diet comparison, a range of diets fed at rates ranging from very low to high was

319 compared. This experimental design was chosen to reduce the likelihood that the variation in

320 the proportion of any particular component of diet (protein, fat or carbohydrates) might result in

321 outcomes that do not represent the most favorable levels of diet fed. Because the ratios of

322 protein, carbohydrates and fats differ among diets, a wide-level design is agnostic regarding

323 which is most important for the outcomes tested. This approach is in contrast to Linenberg [3] in

324 which the combined weight of fat and protein – to the exclusion of carbohydrates - was used to

325 determine the amounts of diet provided to larvae for comparisons.

326 The reputation of Ae. aegypti as a robust and physiologically plastic laboratory model for

327 laboratory study was borne out by the high eclosion rates at all diet levels compared to

328 An. gambiae which was very sensitive to level. This trait also makes it a relatively insensitive

329 choice with which to compare diets.

330 These results demonstrated that as far as choosing a diet, TetraMin is the least desirable for

331 An. gambiae because of the sensitivity to diet level that was required for adult production;

332 neither the highest nor lowest doses resulted in adults within what we considered a practical

333 time period. Linenberg et al. [3] also observed that two pellet fish foods performed better than

334 TetraMin flakes though it is not clear whether the specific product was the same as the one we

335 tested.

336 We were surprised that two different formulations of the Damiens diet prepared by CDC and

337 Frontier Scientific Services gave measurably different results. There are two differences which



https://doi.org/10.1101/740142

338 might have contributed. Frontier used defatted liver powder whereas the CDC source did not

339 specify whether it was defatted or not. Secondly, the Frontier team had access to a hammer mill

340 which permitted the tuna meal to be ground more finely – likely contributing a larger amount of

341 indigestible scale and bone to the final formulation of diet resulting in lower concentrations of

342 other tuna parts. The CDC team discarded the larger particles. These two differences may have

343 resulted in a formulation with substantially different nutritional content on a weight basis.

344 Of the diets tested, one can make an evaluation of their performance assuming, somewhat

345 subjectively, that maximal survival rates, longevity and size along with short development times

346 are desirable outcomes (Table 9).

Table 9. A semi-subjective assessment of the salient biological outcomes measured as an

assessment of laboratory use of the four diets tested (advantageous characteristics are highlighted

in green, neutral ones in gray and disadvantageous ones in yellow.)


CDC Frontier Koi TetraMin CDC Frontier Koi TetraMin

Survival to

eclosionNo effect of diet type Highest

Probability of

pupae to

eclose

No effect of diet type Highest

Eclosion

sensitivity to

diet levels

fewer

adults

eclosing

Lowest



https://doi.org/10.1101/740142

at lowest

level

Development

rateLittle difference observed

More

consiste

nt

Dry weight Little difference observed Little consistent advantage

Adult

longevity

> for

males

> for

males

> for

females

> for

females

347

348 The deviation from a 1:1 ratio of females and males that we observed in the New Orleans strain

349 of Ae. aegypti is common among many strains of Ae. aegypti [12]. In contrast, the authors are

350 unaware of any natural strains of An. gambiae that demonstrate sex ratio bias although this has

351 been observed among progeny of crosses between different species of the An. gambiae

352 complex [13].

353 One diet, Koi, was tested to determine whether the method of presentation of the same diet had

354 an effect on the development rate and survival to the pupa stage. Of the other diets that could

355 be fed in either a whole or ground form, only TetraMin is originally in a flake form and similar

356 comparisons are possible. Any of the powders or flakes can be fed either as powder sprinkled

357 on the surface, a practice which is consistent with the ‘surface feeding’ behavior of Anopheles

358 spp. [1].

359 The authors are aware that some laboratories provide the diet as intact pellets or flakes rather

360 than as a slurry. The difference between the total weights of food in our analysis confounds our

361 analysis and arguably, if one provided more pellets, the development rates of females would be

362 the same as when fed slurry. But as far as these analyses can be interpreted, one can conclude

363 that for a given amount of food, increasing the availability in a ground form will increase the



https://doi.org/10.1101/740142

364 development rate. Feeding as a slurry also allows a continuously variable (rather than discrete)

365 amount of food to be delivered though this advantage requires mixing and pipetting slurry vs.

366 simply counting pellets.

367 Our results demonstrate that although the An. gambiae feeding rate in mosquito publications on

368 is often described as ‘ad libitum’, it is almost certain this is not the case. The levels of diet that

369 result in the largest size cause so much mortality that they would not be used. Expressing it

370 another way, larvae will continue eating more food at levels that are not consistent with overall

371 survival of mosquitoes for experiments. In most experiments, the amount of food that is made

372 available always restricts growth below the maximal size possible under true ad libitum

373 conditions.

374 We consider all of the diets tested acceptable in our hands. However, the superior performance

375 and low cost of the Koi food makes it a good choice for most purposes. It can be fed either as a

376 slurry or pellet and is available in large amounts which can be frozen to stockpile the food for

377 future use, a practice that would permit only occasional importation.

378



https://doi.org/10.1101/740142

379 Acknowledgments

380 We appreciate the custom Damiens diet formulation that was generously prepared by MV and

381 KG at Frontier Scientific Services and supplied to the CDC with the understanding that the

382 experimental design and diet comparisons would not be influenced by the potential for

383 commercialization. Frontier kindly formulated the diet and provided it without charge for these

384 comparisons.

385 The following reagents were obtained through the NIH Biodefense and Emerging Infections

386 Research Resources Repository, NIAID, NIH: An. gambiae, strain ‘G3’ (MRA-112) and Ae.

387 aegypti ‘New Orleans’ strain (NR-49160).

388 The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily

389 represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

390 Funded byTarget Malaria, a project that receives core funding from the Bill & Melinda

391 Gates Foundation and from the Open Philanthropy Project Fund, an advised fund of Silicon

392 Valley Community Foundation.

393

394



https://doi.org/10.1101/740142

395 References Cited

396 1. Clements AN. The biology of mosquitoes. Volume 1: development, nutrition and

397 reproduction. CABI;1992.

398 2. Carvalho DO, Nimmo D, Naish N, McKemey AR, Gray P, Wilke, ABB, et al. Mass

399 Production of Genetically Modified Aedes aegypti for Field Releases in Brazil. J

400 Visualized Exps. 2013; (), e3579.

401 3. Linenberg I, Christophides GK, Gendrin M. Larval diet affects mosquito development and

402 permissiveness to Plasmodium infection. Sci Rep. 2016;6(1):38230–10.

403 4. Dame DA, Haile DG, Lofgren CS, Bailey DL, Munroe WL. Improved rearing techniques

404 for larval Anopheles albimanus: use of dried mosquito eggs and electric heating tapes.

405 Mosquito News. 1978;38(1):68–74.

406 5. Kivuyo HS, Mbazi PH, Kisika DS, Munga S, Rumisha SF, Urasa FM, et al. Performance

407 of Five Food Regimes on Anopheles gambiae senso stricto Larval Rearing to Adult

408 Emergence in Insectary. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(10):e110671.

409 6. Gerberg EJ. Manual for mosquito rearing and experimental techniques. Am Mosquito

410 Control Assoc Bull. 1979;5:1–124.

411 7. R DH, Kleinjan JE, Asman SM. Eicosapentanoic Acid in Mosquito Tissues: Differences

412 Between Wild and Laboratory-Reared Adults. Environ Entomol. 1988;17(2):172–80.

413 8. Damiens DD, Benedict MQ, Wille M, Gilles JRL. An Inexpensive and Effective Larval Diet

414 for Anopheles arabiensis (Diptera: Culicidae): Eat Like a Horse, a Bird, or a Fish? J Med

415 Entomol. 2012;49(5):1001–11.



https://doi.org/10.1101/740142

416 9. Gilles JRL, Lees RS, Soliban SM, Benedict MQ. Density-dependent effects in

417 experimental larval populations of Anopheles arabiensis (Diptera: Culicidae) can be

418 negative, neutral, or overcompensatory depending on density and diet levels. J Med

419 Entomol. 2011;48(2):296–304.

420 10. R Core Team (2018). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R

421 Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL https://www.R-project.org/

422 11. Savage KE, Lowe RE. A one-piece aluminum cage designed for adult mosquitoes.

423 Mosquito News. 1971;31(1):111–2.

424 12. Hickey WA, Craig GB. Genetic distortion of sex ratio in a mosquito, Aedes aegypti.

425 Genetics. 1966;53(6):1177–96.

426 13. Davidson G. Anopheles gambiae, a complex of species. Bull WHO. 1964;31:625–34.



https://doi.org/10.1101/740142



https://doi.org/10.1101/740142

pragmatic selection of larval mosquito diets for insectary rearing … · 2019. 8. 19. · 1...

Documents