Public private partnership

Minor project ReportonA Study onPublic Private Partnership in Highway ProjectsSubmitted byMayank Sarkar081111020Arnav Kr. Guha081111064Avinash Damera081111067Kamlesh Gupta081111068Sumit Bhadoriya081111070Saket Rusia081111072Prateek Dwivedi081111081Gaurav Singh Chauhan081111085Rajesh Kumar081111098

Under the Guidance of Prof. Siddhartha Rokade Assistant ProfessorDepartment Of Civil Engineering Maulana Azad National Institute of TechnologyBhopal (M.P.)-462051May 2011

Department of Civil EngineeringMaulana Azad National Institute of TechnologyBhopal (M.P.) - 462051May 2011CERTIFICATE

This is to certify that the project titled A Study on Public Private Partnership in Highway Projects submitted by Kamlesh Gupta (081111068) for the minor project of VI SEM B.Tech is a bonafide work carried out by him under our supervision and guidance.

Dr. Vishnu Prasad Patidar Dr. S. K. Dubey Prof. Siddhartha Rokade Project Coordinator Professor and HeadAssistant Professor

AcknowledgmentAny accomplishment requires the effort of many people and this work is not different. We are highly grateful to Prof. Siddhartha Rokade, Assistant Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Maulana Azad National Institute of Technology, our mentor for his judicious guidance and encouragement. It was inconceivable that this work could be completed without his skilful guidance, constructive and valuable suggestions, and co-operation. We are also grateful to Mr. Neeraj Vijay, DGM, Madhya Pradesh Road Development Corporation, and Mr. Sudhakaran, MPRDC who were extremely co-operative in sharing project data which was crucial in taking our work to the right conclusion. We would like to express our gratitude to all the people involved in making this endeavour a success.We also thank our college authority especially Civil Engineering Departments faculties for being kind to me and raising a helping hand in all perspectives as and when needed.

AbstractPublic-Private-Partnership (PPP) provides an opportunity for private sector participation in financing, designing, construction and operation & maintenance of public sector programmes and projects. In this project, study about the Public Private Partnerships (PPPs) programme in highways has been done. PPP is the mode of operation of a service which is implemented by the partnership of government and the private sector for public benefit. Researches are going on, on this concept and different organisations are working in this regard.PPP is an entirely new framework which exploits the available resources. The financial involvement of the markets money is made possible. Also PPP is involvement in a futuristic approach of the market which cannot be adored in any way and in any line, therefor we can say that we have to manage ourselves in the Further, a Case-Study on the 4-laning of Dewas-Bhopal Corridor, which is based on Built Operate and Transfer basis (BOT) method of construction, was done. In this, the project was analysed and accordingly the outcomes of PPP programme were noticed by carrying out the SWOT (Strength, Weakness, Opportunity and Threat) analysis of the afore-mentioned project enabling us to understand PPP to its core.

Contents

ChapterPage No.AcknowledgmentiCertificateiiAbstractiiiContentsiv1. Introduction11.1. General1.1.1. Public Private Partnership The Concept1.1.2. Various forms of Public Private Partnership:1.2. PPP in Highways: An Overview41.2.1. Size of the Initiative1.2.2. Target1.2.3. Approach1.2.4. Policy1.2.5. Outlook2. Literature Review63. A Case study of Dewas-Bhopal Corridor233.1. Project Summary3.1.1. The Site3.1.2. Technical Aspects3.2. The Concession Agreement3.3. SWOT Analysis4. Conclusions365. References38Chapter 1: Introduction1.1 GeneralPublicPrivate Partnership describes a government service or private business venture which is funded and operated through a partnership of government and one or more private sector companies. These schemes are sometimes referred to as PPP, P3 or P3.

1.1.1 Public Private Partnership : The Concept:The term private in PPP encompasses all non-government agencies such as the corporate sector, voluntary organizations, self-help groups, partnership firms, individuals and community based organization. It involves triangular relationships between the State, Private Sector, and those who receive the services. In one sense PPP is the arrangement between the Government or State Sector and the Private Sector where Private Sector can take over, on contractual basis the services and functions, traditionally provided by the State. It refers to long-term, contractual partnerships between the public and private sector agencies, specifically targeted towards financing, designing, implementing, and operating infrastructure facilities and services that were traditionally provided by the public sector. These collaborative ventures are built around the expertise and capacity of the project partners and are based on a contractual agreement, which ensures appropriate and mutually agreed allocation of resources, risks and returns.The Department of Economic Affairs (DEA) defines PPPs as:

PPP means an arrangement between a government or statutory entity or government owned entity on one side and a private sector entity on the other, for the provision of public assets and/ or related services for public benefit, through investments being made by and/or management undertaken by the private sector entity for a specified time period, where there is a substantial risk sharing with the private sector and the private sector receives performance linked payments that conform (or are benchmarked) to specified, pre-determined and measurable performance standards.Typically, a PPP project involves a public sector agency and a private sector consortium which comprises contractors, maintenance companies, private investors, and consulting firms. The consortium often forms a special company or a special purpose vehicle (SPV). The SPV signs a contract with the government and with the subcontractor to build the facility and then maintain it.In some types of PPP, the cost of using the service is borne exclusively by the users of the service and not by the taxpayer. In other types (notably the private finance initiative), capital investment is made by the private sector on the strength of a contract with government to provide agreed services and the cost of providing the service is borne wholly or in part by the government. Government contributions to a PPP may also be in kind (notably the transfer of existing assets). In projects that are aimed at creating public goods like in the infrastructure sector, the government may provide a capital subsidy in the form of a one-time grant, so as to make it more attractive to the private investors. In some other cases, the government may support the project by providing revenue subsidies, including tax breaks or by providing guaranteed annual revenues for a fixed period.1.1.2 Various forms of Public Private Partnership:To enable the flow of private funds and resources into public infrastructure and services, the PPP is operationalized through a contractual relationship between a public body (the conceding authority) and a private company (the concessionaire). This partnership could take many contractual forms, which progressively vary with increasing risk, responsibility and financing for the private sector. The most common partnerships are:I. Service Contract: The Public authority (govt.) contracts out the provision of specific services to a private provider (company) for a specific time period (generally less than 5 years) in return for a management fee. However, the government agency retains the overall responsibility for the operation and maintenance of the system except for the particular contracted services and it bears all the commercial risks.II. Management Contract: This is somewhat similar to the service contract, but differs in a way that it permits the private operator to take day-to-day decisions and holds him responsible for operating and maintaining the system, but it does not make private partner responsible for any capital risks.III. Lease: Under this type of PPP, the government enters into a long term lease agreement with a private company or builder to develop and operate an expanded facility with its (private companys) own fund. In this type of arrangement, the private entity pays a lease rental to the government, and is entitled to keep the revenue to recover its investment plus a reasonable return during the lease period and assumes the operational risks.IV. Concession (BOOT, BOT): A private entity is awarded a concession or franchise by government to finance, build, own and operate a facility. In return, the franchisee gets the right to collect user fee for a specified period, the ownership of the facility is transferred to government.V. BOT (Toll) and BOT (Annuity) Models:a. BOT (Toll) Model : In a BOT (Toll) Model, the concessionaire (private sector) is required to meet the upfront/construction cost and the expenditure on annual maintenance. The Concessionaire recovers the entire upfront/construction cost along with the interest and a return on investment out of the future toll collection. The viability of the project greatly depends on the traffic (i.e., toll). However, with a view to bridge the gap between the investment required and the gains arising out of it, i.e., to increase the viability of the projects, capital grant is also provided.b. BOT (Annuity) Model: In an BOT (Annuity) Model, the Concessionaire (private sector) is required to meet the entire upfront/construction cost (no grant is paid by the client) and the expenditure on annual maintenance The Concessionaire recovers the entire investment and a pre-determined cost of return out of the annuities payable by the client every year. The selection is made based on the least annuity quoted by the bidders (the concession period being fixed). The client (Government) retains the risk with respect to traffic (toll), since the client collects the toll.In India, Planning commission has recommended BOT (Toll) model as first choice.1.2 PPP in Highways: An Overview

1.2.1 Size of the Initiatives:With an extensive road network of 3.3 million kilometres, India is the second largest in the world. Indian roads carry about 61% of the freight and 85% of the passenger traffic. All the highways and expressways together constitute about 66,000 kilometres (only 2% of all roads), whereas they carry 40% of the road traffic. To further the existing infrastructure, Indian Government annually spends about Rs.18000 crores (USD 3.704 billion). 1.2.2. Target Developing 1000 km of expressways Developing 8,737 km of roads, including 3,846 km of national highways, in the North East Four-laning 20, 000 km of national highways Four-laning 6,736 km on North-South and East-West corridors Six-laning 6,500 km of the Golden Quadrilateral and selected national highways Widening 20,000 km of national highways to two lanes 1.2.3 Approach National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) is the apex Government body for implementing the NHDP. All contracts whether for construction or BOT are awarded through competitive bidding Private sector participation is increasing, and is through construction contracts and Build-Operate-Transfer (BOT) for some stretches based on either the lowest annuity or the lowest lump sum payment from the Government BOT contracts permit tolling on those stretches of the NHDP A large component of highways is to be developed through public-private partnerships and several high traffic stretches already awarded to private companies on a BOT basis. 1.2.4 Policy 100% FDI under the automatic route is permitted for all road development projects 100% income tax exemption for a period of 10 years Grants / Viability gap Funding for marginal projects by NHAI. Formulation of Model Concession Agreement

1.2.5. Outlook Annual growth projected at 12-15% for passenger traffic, and 15-18% for cargo traffic Over $50-60 billion investment is required over the next 5 years to improve road infrastructureAn annual growth of 12-15% for passenger traffic has been projected

Chapter 2: Literature Review

Planning Commission, Government of India (2004), Public-Private-Partnership (PPP) provides an opportunity for private sector participation in financing, designing, construction and operation & maintenance of public sector programmes and projects. The time has come to forge a greater interface between the public and the private sector in a wide range of activities in the country. The overwhelming response of voluntary organizations in the aftermath of the earthquake in Gujarat was an outstanding example of public-private-partnership (PPP). The subsequent reconstruction involving expenditure of around US $ 2 billion was also implemented through the PPP mode. The Government of Gujarat succeeded in constructing community school buildings, private health centres and private housing more cost-effectively through public-private-partnership.Association of voluntary organizations and non-profit service agencies in implementation of government programmes in India is a decade old practice. Various schemes in the social sector are implemented by the State Governments in collaboration with VOs/NGOs and the local community. The Government of India has been extending the requisite grants-in-aid for its Centrally Sponsored Schemes, which are routed through the State Governments. The public-private-partnership (PPP) brings in greater professionalism to bear on this association through introducing meaningful concepts. There is, nevertheless, scope of further expanding its coverage and also involve the private corporate sector in this endeavour. This may sometimes require legal and regulatory reforms in select sectors. Any amendment/reform in legislation is, however, possible when the essential features of PPP are well understood.One of the persuasive arguments in favour of PPP is the promise of better quality of service through clear customer focus. It is also argued that introduction of PPP would reverse the years of chronic under-investment through mobilizing public and private capital. Although experience, in this regard, shows that it did not open the floodgates to private sector participation. Perhaps, there is a need for greater public participation in PPP projects through risk sharing to assure the private sector of the necessary comfort they may look for.Participation of the private sector in rural development is encouraged. The private sector can choose the project. The projects when implemented would help the rural poor to derive benefits of rural development. Maintenance of rural roads in three districts of Maharashtra is being done by the sugar co-operatives under PPP. The Department is examining the possibility of expanding PPP, for maintenance of rural roads and the computerization and maintenance of land records (sale and purchase deeds). A closer look at the poor performance of public utilities and social services, in general, also shows that the disease lies in the monopoly characteristic of such activities. Since there is no alternative to the existing (in-house) service providers, the citizens are left with no option other than that of take it or leave it. The executives/ bureaucracy (low & high) may thus take the liberty to indulge in lethargy, corruption and high handedness. It has, therefore, been commented that the important distinction is not public versus private rather it is monopoly versus competition. In this respect, PPP may be looked at as a measure towards administrative reforms.The realisation of the significance of PPP in the development of the country is a big step of the Government of India. The report laid a lot of emphasis on the application of the tool of PPP in the fields of education, healthcare, family welfare, agriculture, rural & urban development etc. It presses on significant goals and their implementation with the use of the PPP mechanism and also highlights future goals.

India Infrastructure Report (2008) mentioned that Roads and Highways are the biggest of Indias PPP infrastructure projects. Indeed, among all other sectors, roads have elicited maximum interest and optimism among private players for PPP. Even the government has outlined some policy initiatives in order to attract private investments in road infrastructure projects. As per NHAI, some of these incentives are as follows: Government will carry out all preparatory work (like land acquisition and utility removal etc.) NHAI/Government of India will provide capital grant of up to 40 per cent of project cost (on case to case basis) 100 per cent tax exemption for ten years Concession period allowed up to thirty years In BOT projects, the entrepreneur is allowed to collect and retain tolls. Duty free import of specified modern high capacity equipment for highway construction.As per the NHAI, over the next ten years (up to 2018), about 32,000 km of national and 25,000 km of state highways need to be widened, at a cost of Rs 1700 billion; highway maintenance will require over Rs 950 billion. NHAI is also repairing the four-laning of 10,000 km of national highways outside the NHDP. The current thinking suggests that most sections would be toll-based BOT, with less viable routes awarded through cash contracts or annuities. Public support will be capped at 40 per cent of project cost (25 per cent during construction and 15 per cent over the concession period). The future of companies in this business thus appears bright. Project execution skills and scalability will, however, be very critical in differentiating successful companies from the rest. It is well established that private developers deliver greater value for money at the construction stage. Under these circumstances, shadow toll may prove to be a good model. This approach was initially adopted in the UK, where government award concessions to build-operate and maintain toll-free highways and then compensate the investors based on roadway usage and/or availability of those facilities. Shadow toll roads are currently operating in the UK, Finland, Spain, and Portugal.In a country like India where railways functions as the artery for goods and public transport system, It was initially difficult to allocate whole sum funds for a rather unimportant sector of roadways, In the form of PPP the government of India and the states were able to get appropriate Initial capital for building such huge infrastructure and the guarantee for the returns for the investments made in the same. Problems in PPP arise from the improper implementation, in policy, there is as such no guideline which leads to confusion and problems but political hindrance and influence do lead to the loss of efficiency and poor quality of the project and the time of completion of the entire project. In case of BOT the user is required to pay toll to use the utility, it becomes difficult to get returns for the idle and structure for community uses.

In NHAI Report, 2010, it was said that the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) is mandated to implement the National Highways Development Project (NHDP). Most of the projects have been developed or are under development on Public Private Partnership (PPP) basis through Build Operate and Transfer (BOT)-Annuity and BOT-Toll mode (these have been explained in detail in later section of the brochure). Typically, in an annuity project, the project IRR is expected to be 12-14% and equity IRR would be 14 -16%. For toll projects, where the concessionaire assumes the traffic risk, the project IRR is expected to be around 14-16% and equity IRR around 18-20% The NHDP is being implemented under several phases:Phase I mainly involves widening (to 4 lanes) and upgrading of 7,498 km of the national highway network and has four component packages (linking of metropolitan cities, NS and EW corridor, Port Connectivity, Other important roads) .Phase-II involves widening and improvement of the NS-EW corridors (not covered under Phase-I) covering a distance of 6,647 km, besides providing connectivity to major ports on the east and west coasts of India and some other projects. This includes 6,161 km of NS-EW corridors and 486 km of other highways. The total length of the NS-EW network under Phases I & II is about 7,200 km. Phase-III involves upgradation of 12,109 km (mainly 4- laning) of high density national highways, through the Build, Operate & Transfer (BOT) mode at a cost of INR 80,626 Crore (USD billion).Phase IV With a view to providing balanced and equitable distribution of the improved/widened highways network throughout the country, NHDP-IV envisages upgrading of 20,000 km of such highways into 2-lane highways, at an indicative cost of INR 27,800 Crore (USD 5.6 billion). Phase-V, under this 6-laning of the 4-lane highways comprising the GQ and certain other high density stretches, will be implemented on BOT basis at an estimated cost of INR 41,210 Crore (USD 8.2 billion). These corridors have been 4-laned as part of the GQ in Phase-I of NHDP. Implementation of initial set of projects has already commenced and the entire package is expected to be completed by 2012. Of the 6,500 km proposed under NHDP-V, about 5,700 km would be taken up in the GQ and the balance 800 km would be selected on the basis of predefined eligibility criteria.Phase VI: With the growing importance of urban canters of India, particularly those located within a few hundred kilometres of each other, expressways would be both viable and beneficial. The Government has approved 1,000 km of expressways to be developed on a BOT basis, at an indicative cost of INR 16,680 Crore (USD 3.3 billion). These expressways would be constructed on new alignments.Phase VII: The development of ring roads, bypasses, grade separators and service roads are considered necessary for full utilisation of highway capacity as well as for enhanced safety and efficiency. For this, a programme for development of such features at an indicative cost of INR 16,680 Crore has been approved by the Government.Hence we see that the early success of Public-Private-Partnerships (PPP) in the NHDP, arguably, set the tone for similar initiatives in other infrastructure sectors and has provided the single largest opportunity for private financing and management of infrastructure services. More than 60% of the estimated investment requirement is expected to be privately financed.NHAI projects, with higher traffic volumes, have also been bid out on the basis of Negative Grant (upfront payment payable by successful bidder to NHAI). However, under the revised MCA, projects under BOT/ DBFOT framework have also been awarded on a revenue share basis, where the bidder offering the highest revenue share (subject to technical qualification) is awarded the project.

Vijay raj Kumar Charles (2009) emphasizes the importance of good infrastructure in boosting the economic status of a nation. The best way to go about achieving the same is by enhanced private section participation. Mobilizing funds through greater co-operation of privates sector will lead to greater development and fewer risks on account of shared assets. The author aims at seeking the reason behind varied presence of PPPs in different states by delving into policy, regulation, availability of resources, exposure to land and finances etc. Some of the conducive factors are low political risk, hassle free implementation of policies, a trimmed and efficient bureaucracy, and infrastructure, availability of power, low corruption and proper legal framework.In the last 10 years, Indian states have made considerable innovation with different structures to attract private participation in delivering infrastructure services. According to the value of projects, the state of Karnataka tops the list with 92 projects at an estimated value of `34795 Crore, followed by NHAI, Maharashtra, Ministry of Civil Aviation, Sikkim, and Gujarat. Sector wise analysis indicates that, Road sector dominates the list with maximum number of PPP Projects, 264 (67%), followed by urban development, Ports, energy sector, Airport projects, and tourism projects 6, and 3 projects in Railways. The Indian state governments have tried to create an environment that will be attractive to investors and fair to customers. The approaches in structuring the framework is divided among: combining dedicated institutions with cross-cutting legislation; establishing and using cross-sectoral PPP advisory units to help line departments in the absence of overarching legislation and relying on line departments and sectoral agencies to build capacities.Category-I, The states of Andhra Pradesh, Gujarat, Karnataka etc. have developed enabling legislation and established dedicated cross sectoral institutions. These states have constituted specialized agencies and passed legislations to promote PPPs in infrastructure. (Example: Gujarat infrastructure Development Board, The Andhra Pradesh Infrastructure Authority). Category-II, A second category of states, such as Rajasthan, Uttaranchal, Kerala and West Bengal have developed cross-sectoral facilitation entities, but have not passed comprehensive legislation.Category-III, Finally, a third category of states, including MP, Maharashtra and Tamil Nadu, have relied on sectoral and line agencies to develop and implement PPPs.Initially in M.P., the Public works Department (PMMWD) and then the specially created MP Road Development Corporation (MPRDC) have acted as the agency for development of road projects on BOT basis in the state. In the process of developing projects, MPRDC has developed policy, guidance materials and skills for facilitating PPPs in Road sector.It can be said that there is no clear link between policies in a state or frameworks with high number of PPPs. However, it can be safely assumed that states need to be proactive in order to attract greater interest from private sectors. Those states which have made their political intent clear by introducing laws are reaping benefits. The cost of corruption is a major deterrent to PPPs. A lumbering bureaucracy will not be able to efficiently process forms and the corrupt officials will only hinder true progress. Companies need assurance that they will not have to spend countless, unproductive hours greasing greedy hands. States that are already in possession of good infrastructure facilities and which can guarantee continuous power supply are considered hot spots for investors. They will prefer such locations for a project over a comparatively backward place. Poor transportation facilities may also prove to be a deal breaker. Availability and enforcement of Legal and Institutional frameworks that are conducive for PPP investment are is no doubt important factors, for the investors while deciding about investment in PPP projects. Since the government is responsible for providing land, it is not an important factor. The estimated net-cost benefit should be as high as possible.There is still a long way for Indian states to go to realize their full potential when it comes to PPPs, but the several innovative procedures already in use are making strong headways. However, it is imperative for us to get our basics right and keep the nations development above our own. There is lots of work still to be done.

S. Vasudevan (2003) emphasizes on the infrastructure policy of Karnataka for publicprivate partnership. IDeCK (Infrastructure Development Corporation of Karnataka) created policies and measures that are incentive compatible and have economic and market logic, and that drew little administrative energies. The principal objective of the policy was to encourage private sector participation in infrastructure development. The policies included power(including power generation, transmission, distribution, and power trading services), integrated transport and logistics(roads, bridges, railway systems, ports, airports etc.), urban and municipal infrastructure(water supply and sewerage systems, solid waste and garbage disposal facilities), industrial infrastructure(industrial parks, Special Economic/Free Trade Zones, Export Promotion Zones, industrial estates, and industrial townships) and infrastructure related to tourism and agriculture. The private sector was expected to play a key role in providing value for money (VFM) by enhanced quality of services to users, reduction in and gradual elimination of pricing constraints, enabling public funds to be earmarked for socially justifiable projects, financial innovation and development of cost-effective solutions and savings in costs by innovative designs, timely project implementation, and higher efficiencies in operations.The principle for the creation of an appropriate institutional and regulatory framework was necessary. These included efficient use of existing assets and optimal allocation of additional resources, equitable contractual structures i.e. that the government would enter into suitable contractual arrangements with private developers for development and management of both existing (O&M contracts, leases, sale or divestment) and new assets (BOT, BOOT, etc.). It also included the transparent process of procurement which would ensure that private services are procured in a fair and transparent manner.A single or two-stage process could be used for awarding contracts on the basis of an open competitive bidding process depending on the complexity of the project. The selection criteria used would be among quantifiable technical criteria, lowest present value of financial support from GoK/subsidy, highest share (or present value) of revenue, lowest present value of payments by GoK, highest upfront payment (or present value of upfront payments), highest present value of future payments, lowest concession period, lowest present value of user fees or highest premium (or present value of) on equity shares offered.The government has realized that fiscal incentives are perhaps necessary but not a sufficient condition for successful private sector participation. A key priority of government is the progressive elimination of subsidies and cross-subsidies so that prices for services are commensurate with the real costs of provision. The draft infrastructure policy developed by iDeCK for the Government of Karnataka provides an umbrella framework for development/restructuring of various sectoral policies to bring about purposeful reform in issues of governance that would allow greater private participation in infrastructure projects. Further, it also provides a basis on which the government would develop medium and long term strategies and implementation plans for each of the infrastructure sectors clearly setting out the role for the private sector, in both the management of existing assets and creation of new assets.Though the Karnataka government has a long way ahead but these steps seem to play an important role for infrastructure development. In order to meet the objective of growth and equity, the government should build a strong PPP which is possible by the true will of the government along with the participation of private sector in infrastructure. The governments concern for making this possible can be seen by the various policy incentives like providing an umbrella framework for making the painful and laborious governmental procedure fast , setting up a competitive and transparent platform for allocation of projects to the private sectors, giving subsidies and tax relaxation to them etc. Also the private sector is keen and excited to make such projects reach their objectives, due to extent of profit involved in it.

Alfen Wilhelm (2006) considers economics in construction as a specific management doctrine that intends to cover the interfaces between the pure technical and economic as well as the various other aspects influencing the constantly changing business environment of the real estate and infrastructure markets.Alfen in 2004 analysed the possibilities of procurement of Federal highways as Public Private Partnerships. Useful advice had been given to the public authorities on three different levels, short-term, mid-term and long term. A short-term recommendation had been the later successful establishment of the German A- and F-models and the founding of the VIFG (Verkehrs Infrastruktur Finanzierungs Gesellschaft), in the mid-term perspective the assignment of the duties planning, financing and managing to the VIFG and in the long term the creation of sub-networks, which can be applied by a concession model. He, in 2005 studied the possibility of privatisation of the federal highways. The formal, the functional and the material privatisation had been analysed. One major conclusion was that the functional privatisation has a high potential concerning federal highways. Among other things the following results appeared: Producing the possibility to apply route and sub-network concessions. Complete change from tax financing to user financing. Creation of sub-networks and apply as sub-network concessionsIn this specific field there has been a lot of research in the last years, which can be separated into three fields: privatisation, alternative procurement modes and user financed schemes of federal highways.Estimated future and current market needs:Devising new schemes of public-private partnership seems to be an effective way to overcome public balance constraints. Deregulation and privatisation were expected to improve managerial efficiency, reduce the financial drain of public enterprises on the public purse, offer a better solution to market failure problems (such as natural monopoly) and introduce competition to sectors that are no longer understood to constitute monopolies. Hence a continuing policy and promotion of PPP is needed to form a stable PPP market. Otherwise economic up and downs will create an instable and inefficient market. The public sector should think of PPP from a more sustainable perspective, that if they want to have PPP as an alternative procurement method during times of fiscal constraints there is also a need to support PPP during times of economic growth.Current and Future Research Needs:Concerning the field of alternative procurement modes for transport infrastructure a lot of research has been done in the recent years. Current research led us to the conclusion to divide procurement modes into sector wise regulation and provision, sector wise financing and project realisation. As a first step, the scope of our work is to gain an explicit description and determination of different types of procurement. In addition, we intend to use the framework to also be able to develop, customize, manage and evaluate projects following different procurement concepts.The main emphasis he laid was to give advice in three different levels: short term, midterm, long term. The structure of this above given research project distinguishes an operationalisation model and an industry framework. The operational model is focusing project specific questions regarding planning, financing, implementation and operation. It was his intention to break the understanding of infrastructure further down in this structured research approach by introducing a four stages approach that consists of the understanding of the cultural framework-, country-specific-, sector-specific- and project-specific-characteristics. Safety incentives linked to performance based indicators in PPP contracts have not been implemented very often up to now. The functional privatisation has a high potential concerning federal highways. He wanted to change the method from tax financing to user financing. He thought of creating sub-networks and wanted to apply sub network concessions so that it could ensure future development of public private partnership. He wanted the research to continue in three different fields which are namely privatisation, alternative procurement, and user financed schemes. It introduces competition to sectors that are no longer understood to constitute monopolies.

Anant singh et al. (2009) emphasizes on some interesting queries arise in the minds of the people, such as Why have some projects attracted private investment while others have not? Why only a few states have attracted PPPs, while some others have completely failed to do so? Is PPP a viable and desirable public policy for development of infrastructure in poor states? What are the lessons emerging from the Indian experience with PPPs so far? It will be seemingly fair to mention the views of Mr. Anant, Delhi school of economics, in this context as his views give us a good insight into the matter.The success of the on-going eleventh five-year plan for infrastructure critically depends on private investment. The private sector is expected to finance more than eighty percent of the ambitious National Highways Development Project (NHDP), undertaken to develop highways and expressways across the country. We examine the performance of the Public Private Partnerships (PPPs) Programme of the Government of India, for development of national highways and expressways. We study various issues In India; the PPPs on national highways are sponsored by the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) on behalf of the Ministry of Roads Transport and Highways, Government of India. The state governments have a crucial role to play in the implementation of the PPP contracts. Under a PPP the public as well as the private sectors can contribute towards the provisions of public goods or services, such as roads, railways, ports, airports, etc. The government can provide land for the project site, regulatory clearances, and a concession right to the contractor/concessionaire. The private sector, on the other hand, is expected to invest funds during the construction and maintenance phases of infrastructure projects. The first policy framework for PPPs was introduced in 1997 as decision of the Cabinet of the Central Government. The highway PPP policy essentially provided for two kinds of contracts BOT toll contracts and BOT annuity contracts. The national highways are owned by the Government of India. The national highway Act has been amended in 1995 with a view to attract private investment in road development, maintenance and operation. With this amendment, private investment in infrastructure via PPPs has become a possibility.The contractual clause for the PPP has several desirable and efficiency enhancing attributes. Provisions for suspension and termination of the contract avoid moral hazard during the implementation phase. The clauses encourage the concessionaire to complete the project sooner and avoid time overrun by also encouraging the use of better technology.Under NHDP, national highways are being upgraded. The program has to be implemented in seven phases; Phase I-VII. While Phases I, II, III, V, VI and VII are to be executed by the NHAI, the Phase IV will be executed by the parent Ministry of Shipping, Roads Transport and Highways. Work has started only on Phases I, II, III and V. As on July 31, 2009 a total of 405 road projects have been undertaken for up gradation. Some of these projects have been undertaken on PPP basis. Since the first PPP project, the number of PPPs has been ever increasing over the years. National highways covered under Phases I, II, III and V span across most states in the union of India. Though the NHAI has tried giving the up gradation work on PPP scheme in all states, some states have attracted more PPPs than others.Tamil Nadu, Andhra Pradesh and Maharashtra are the favourite states; together these states account for as much as 45% of all PPPs in the country. States like Assam, Jharkhand, Bihar, Orissa and Kerala. On the other hand ,However , to assess the relative success of states merely in terms of the number of PPPs is not plausible Since, the number of PPPs in a state does not necessarily reflect the financial stakes involved in PPP projects in that state.In this paper, the author States with higher per capita income have attracted more PPPs than the poorer states. Road projects located in richer states have shown higher probability of attracting private investment than those located in the poorer ones. Other things remaining the same, projects located on national highways connecting richer states and those located closer to mega cities have exhibited higher probability of becoming PPPs. Similarly, keeping all other things constant states with better governance index and projects located in them have higher probability of attracting private investment. The likelihood of private investment increases in direct proportion to the per-capita SGDP. Private sector is likely to invest only in projects if they are located very close to some big city. For example, states like Rajasthan can hope to attract PPPs on major national highways passing through the state that connect Delhi and Haryana in the North with Gujarat and Maharashtra in the South.

L. Weidner et al. (2003) emphasized the formulation of the technical assistance (TA) for preparing a public-private partnership (PPP) expressway project in Sri Lanka. As the current load on the roads is already very high and with the development it is likely to rise at an enormous rate, thus there is a greater need for this project.The Asian Development Bank held discussions with responsible Officials of the concerned agencies, including the Ministry of Policy Development and Implementation; Ministry of Enterprise Development, Industrial Policy, and Investment Promotion (MOED IP&IP); Ministry of Finance; Ministry of Highways (MOH), Board of Investment (BOI); and Bureau of Infrastructure Investment (BII) for the same. Subsequent to the Fact-Finding Mission, the Government decided to single source from its own funds consulting services from PricewaterhouseCoopers (Pvt.) Ltd, India in association with PricewaterhouseCoopers Private Limited, Sri Lanka (PWC), and Snowy Mountains Engineering Corporation International PTY Limited (SMEC), to assist in the development of the Colombo-Katunayake Expressway (CKE) on a PPP basis.Roads account for about 92% of freight and passenger traffic in Sri Lanka and play a critical role in the countrys development. The road network spans 83,880 kilometres (km). The network is divided into three categories: (i) the primary system of about 11,650 km of national highways (classes A and B) serving interprovincial and long-distance traffic; (ii) the secondary system, consisting of 13,880 km of provincial roads (classes C, D, and E) serving intra-provincial traffic; and (iii) the tertiary systems, comprising 58,350 km of local roads. Despite the extensive road network, its quality and capacity is not sufficient to meet the present and expected future demand for passenger and freight transport services. Most roads were built more than 50 years ago and current traffic levels exceed the design capacity of many roads. This has resulted in high traffic accident rates and overall traffic congestion. Road maintenance, rehabilitation, and new construction have not kept pace with the rapid growth in demand for transport. Financial boost to the project has been provided by Asian Development Bank. Asian Development Bank has provided nine loans for the road sector, totalling $400 million, and 18 Technical Assistance, totalling $8.55 million. Among multilateral funding agencies, ADB is currently the largest multilateral agency to the road sector in Sri Lanka and is coordinating its support with other external agencies.As per author the consultants will identify, review, and analyze the existing policy, regulatory, and institutional frameworks for private sector involvement in the financing, constructing, operating and maintaining expressways. In addition to this, they will evaluate the constraints to the existing frameworks' abilities to enhance public sector financing capacity, and attract private sector participation according to policy objectives, this is the action methodology.The total cost of the Technical Assistance is estimated at $1.0 million equivalent, comprising $736,000 in foreign exchange and $264,000 equivalent in local currency costs. ADB will provide $800,000 comprising $736,000 in foreign exchange costs and $64,000 equivalent of local currency cost. For proper implementation of the project a project steering committee (PSC), subject to ADBs approval, will be established for the Technical Assistance. The PSC will provide overall policy guidance to the consultants and ensure the quality of the study. In particular, the PSC will oversee the development of the model concession agreement and set up a technical subcommittee for this purpose, with representatives from relevant stakeholders, including lenders. The PSC will be co-chaired by the Ministry of Finance, Ministry of Transport, Highways and Civil Aviation and Ministry of Policy Development and Implementation.

Shunso Tsukada (2005) has stated comparison between Public sector and Public sectors working methodology and discussed the pros and cons of both construction techniques. Also author has presented procurement analysis, finance details and credit enhancement measures, apart from various bids cases. Facing massive infrastructure needs, the private nance initiative (PFI) has gained renewed attention from the development community. PFIs are more prevalent in developing countries than in developed countries. This is due in part to the more severe budgetary constraints developing countries are facing, and also due to the fact that main cost elements such as labour, materials and land are still low in price in developing countries. Strong skepticism still exists about the applicability of the PFI approach to developing countries, particularly in Asia. This is largely due to the following intrinsic difculties associated with highway development: Risks associated with land acquisition and construction. Lumpy initial capital investments and the resultant long gestation period. Difculties in trafc forecast and associated uncertainties in future revenue ow.The strongest benet of the BOT scheme (if structured correctly as indicated in a viability gap funding or VGF scheme) lies in closing a hidden loophole in public sector procurement. A major problem with public sector procurement derives from the fact that the contract will usually be won by the lowest bidder. Tactics that experienced bidders often employ is to bid low (often lower than cost price) and win the contract, and then claim for the higher costs incurred later, by requesting compensation for variations to contracts. As per past trend works which have been accomplished by public sector the cost of projects have been cut down to a marginal extent but there are drawbacks which add up to this marginal cost saving. They do not render cost of Operation and Maintenance. It is almost impossible to compare real world performance of these two systems viz. Public and Private, on the basis of specic cases. In this regard, an analysis was conducted in 2007 by PricewaterhouseCoopers of India (PwC) following a request from the Highway Authority of India (NHAI). The size of the sample in the survey by PricewaterhouseCooper was 150, including 135 EPC contracts, 8 BOT contracts and 7 annuity concessions. The average length of the highways covered by each EPC contract was 31km. The major findings of this analysis are as below. The performance of BOT is far superior to other forms of contract in terms of cost effectiveness and delivery time. At the time of the completion, construction costs were 30% lower than EPC and 57% lower than annuity schemes. BOT construction was completed one month earlier than the original schedule, in sharp contrast to the average 16-month delays in EPC contract and 3-month delays in annuity contracts. The above ndings provide a clear justication for the GOI to move to BOT-PPP schemes, away from the traditional item rate contracts using public sector nancing.As per him PFIs cover a wide spectrum of private sector participation, including: (i) service contracts; (ii) management contract; (iii) leasing; (iv) concessions; and (v) privatization, the second generation PPPs primarily focus on concessions, particularly BOT schemes. The author also posited unsolicited bids, this occasionally happens in case where private sector companies come up with a completely new project concept which can bring major benets to the communities through innovation.On the financial status of the PPP associated projects author has described both finance schemes viz, corporate nance scheme and project nance. Corporate finance is a traditional way of nancing investment is under which sponsors will borrow the money from banks by offering the creditworthiness of the sponsoring companies as a security for the payment of the entire debt and under project finance project company (which is generally formed by sponsors) mobilizes necessary funds by pledging to lenders the future revenue ow to be generated by the assets created by the project. The later finance scheme is adopted generally when investment is more than $50 million (as per NHDP).The BOT and annuity concession schemes mobilize funds through borrowing from nancial institutions, and through other nancing methods including issuance of bonds. This often requires a variety of credit enhancement measures or risk mitigation measures so as to alleviate the concerns of nanciers. The author quoted following measures viz, Minimum revenue guarantee, Foreign exchange risk guarantee, Partial credit guarantee, Political risk guarantee. There has been a discussion over monoline and multiline services. For large infrastructure projects such as those over $500 million, bonds are the most efcient way of mobilizing the necessary funds for investment. However, if the project is BOT-based, the cost of the bond would be very high because of the difculties of recourse and resultant low credit rating. However, if all the risks are covered by a reputable guarantor, the credit rating will be upgraded and the cost of issuing the bond will be immensely reduced. An innovative mechanism which has recently emerged is a guarantee by nancial insurance companies. Since this insurance is applied only to the bond, this insurance service is often called a monoline service as opposed to multiline insurance services which cover a variety of business activities.The revenue generation from the PPP projects, so called PPP concessions is Tolls, Capital grants, annuities and financial viability gap fund. Another important parameter in deciding the selection of contractor is the length of concession period. To overcome the problem of fixed length of concession period a system of least present value of revenue (LPVR) was developed.A key lesson of the program is that the government has to be aware of the contractor driven nature of the BOT program. It should be noted that the BOT concept was originally devised by the construction industry at the time when excess capacity of the construction industry existed. The government should design the BOT scheme in such a manner to ensure that the assets created by BOT contractors are properly operated and maintained. To enhance the creditworthiness of projects, the Government should introduce a minimum revenue guarantee and also an exchange rate guarantee. As the competition becomes intense, the tolls proposed by bidders will become lower and lower but, at the same time consideration should be taken to decide a floor level of tolls so that bids do not go below cost of project. There is a need to estimate properly the negative impact of the competing roads. Also there is a need to check the renegotiation of the cost of project by the private sector.In order to create an immediate and visible impact on the ever-worsening traffic congestion, the government should adopt a rather unusual selection criterion, the shortest concession period instead of the conventional lowest toll criterion. As far as finance is concerned, steps should be taken to increase the foreign investments in PPP projects. Even though there is a risk factor involved, the agencies must show faith in the lenders as if the project is completed successfully it is worth investing in the PPP projects. Lack of planning can result in major failure, costing the nation an enormous amount. However, if they are planned well, PPP schemes can bring benets especially to the developing countries like India.

Chapter 3. Case Study of Dewas-Bhopal CorridorA case study of Dewas-Bhopal Corridor, built on BOT (Toll) basis has been done to analyse the Public Private Partnership in highways project. And the SWOT analysis is done of the same .Brief overview of the Project is summarised below:

Dewas-Bhopal Corridor3.1 Project Summary:3.1.1 The Site: The road project is situated between Bhopal and Dewas. The Bhopal-Dewas section of NH-86/SH-18 starts from Lalghati chowk in Bhopal city. The entire length of 142.60 km consists of following sections:i. Bhopal-Sehore existing four lane section (km 6/8 to 26/4) = 19.6 kmii. Existing Sehore Bypass two lane section (ch 0.0 to 16+100) = 16.1 kmiii. Existing two lane road from end of Sehore bypass to Dewas Bypass junction (ch. 16+100 to ch. 123+100) = 106.9 kmUnder the proposal, Bhopal Sehore existing four lane section is proposed to be strengthened and raised. The existing carriageway is proposed to be widened from 2 lanes to 4 lane width with 2.5m wide hard shoulder and 1.0m wide earthen shoulder alongside. The new 2 lane carriageway is proposed alongside the existing carriageway separated by a 4.5 to 10.5 m wide median. This section of state highway traverses through a flat terrain of mostly agricultural belt except about 9.0 kms hilly stretch at Dodi ghat.

An aerial view of the Dewas-Bhopal Corridor (New)

3.1.2 Technical Aspects:Right-of-Way:The existing ROW of the project road varies widely between 20m to 30 m. land acquisition process to acquire additional land to have 50m ROW has been done.Geometrics:It is observed that the project highway predominantly has a straight alignment and traverses through plain terrain. It is essential to provide improvement proposals to the substandard geometric at various locations on the project roads.Road condition survey and Pavement Composition:As per the pavement condition data gathered from test pit investigations, the total thickness of existing pavement varies from 170mm to 720mm. The pavement mainly comprises of WBM base course over subgrade, overlaid by mainly thin layers of bituminous macadam and mix seal surfacing/semi dense bituminous carpet or bituminous concrete. The bituminous course layers thickness varies between 70mm to 380mm, while that of WBM between 100m to 350mm and GSB between 0 to 300mm.Cross drainage works:There are four major bridges on the project highway. There are total 18 minor bridge and culverts on the project road.

3.2 The Concession Agreement:The Concession Agreement for the four laning of Dewas-Bhopal corridor on BOT-basis was signed on 30th June, 2007, between Madhya Pradesh Road Development Corporation Ltd. (State Government Agency) and the private consortium which includes M/s Dewas Bhopal Corridor Pvt. Ltd., M/s Chetak Enterprises Pvt. Ltd., and M/s BSBK Pvt. Ltd. The agreement includes the detailed design, engineering, financing, procurement, construction, operation and maintenance of the Project Highway under BOT-basis.The Total Project cost is the lowest of the following:a. A sum of Rs. 426.64 Crores as on Toll Date.b. Actual capital cost of the Project upon completion of the Project Highway as certified by the Auditors; orc. Total project cost as set forth in Financing Documents.Grant of concession:The Concessionaire is allotted certain privileges to enable them to complete their obligations in a hindrance free manner. However, they are granted only for the concession period and are subject to fulfilment of certain conditions. Some of the ones the Concessionaire entitled to are:1. Access to the site2. Investigation of site in detail as per scope of work3. Managing toll after completion of construction work4. Bear and pay all costs, expenses and charges in connection with the performance of the obligationsConditions Precedent:The rights and obligations of the Parties are subject to the satisfaction in full of certain conditions set in advance.The MPRDC shall:1. Procure Right of Way for the Concessionaire2. Procure approval of Railway authorities to build bridges etc. over existing tracks3. Procure all applicable permits relating to environment

Security:The Concessionaire will give the MPRDC a sum of Rs. 2133 lakhs for due and faithful performance of obligations. Failure to provide performance security will lead to appropriation of bid security. They are given extra time to rectify faults.Maintenance Security-The Concessionaire will give Rs. 4.27 Crore for faithful performance of its obligations during the tolling period.Obligations and Undertakings:Concessionaire:1. Make necessary applications to govt. agencies2. Notify MPRDC forthwith the occurrence of Financial Closure3. Submit true copies of all agreements and drafts of all amendments4. Not to permit any change in ownership5. Take prior consent for making changes6. Give prior notice to MPRDC for any alterations7. Clear the working area of machinery, debris etc. when work is done there8. Procure required rights and licenses9. Ensure smooth running of project including proper safetyThe Concessionaire will exercise the rights and take care of the site at their own cost. They have certain obligations before the construction. They need to submit detailed plans which may be rectified by an independent organization. Perform all deeds. Select a representative for handling with the government agencies.The Concessionaire shall prepare and submit drawings promptly. They should have all necessary details. During construction, a review of the Detailed Project Report should be carried out and detailed engineering should be carried out. The existing lanes should also be maintained. They should be freed from potholes.The MPRDC is obliged to 1. Hand over physical possession of the project site2. Permit its peaceful use3. Provide reasonable support and assistance to ConcessionaireThere need to be warranties undertaken by Concessionaire that it is fully capable of and will do quality work meeting all specifications. All laws should be adhered to as shall the agreements salient points. There is also a disclaimer that the Concessionaire accepts all inherent risks.If the concessionaire fails to achieve any project mile stone, concessionaire will be charged at 10000/- per day until the same is achieved If the delay is in project completion and the concessionaire is not able to convince MPRDC that the circumstances were beyond his control then the concessionaire shall pay the damages to MPRDCMonitoring and supervision during operation:The concessionaire shall take periodic inspection (at least once in a month but once in a week during monsoon) to determine the condition of the Highway as performance maintenance manual and shall submit Maintenance Report to MPRDC and Independent Consultant. The Independent Consultant also shall review the Maintenance Report and inspect the Highway once in a Fortnight and make the O & M Inspection Report and send it to MPRDC. The concessionaire should within 30 days from receipt of O & M Inspection Report send a report to MPRDC remedying all the deficiencies or defects as stated by the Independent Consultant (if any). The Independent Consultant may ask Concessionaire to undertake some tests as per Specifications and Standards. Under such situations Concessionaire must submit test results to MPRDC and Independent Consultant.The Concessionaire shall ensure safe conditions for the users and in the event of accidents, vehicle breakdowns, etc. setting up of traffic cones and lights and removal of debris should be done with delay. The Concessionaire shall furnish Monthly Fee Statement, within 7 days during Toll Period. The MPRDC shall recover 1% of the toll from the ESCROW Account, for each accounting year.Safety requirement:The responsibility of the Concessionaire is limited to removal of the debris or other vehicle which may endanger or interrupt smooth traffic flow ion Highway. He should ensure that any interruption in the traffic is remedied without delay. An Independent monitors the safety and if he encounters any breach, he should report it within 24 hours to MPRDC. All the cost and expenses arising out of safety requirements are borne by the Concessionaire.Breach may lead the Concessionaire to the award of penalty points and a total of 5 penalties in any continuous period of 365 days shall constitute a Material Breach of the Agreement.Independent consultant:MPRDC appoints the Independent Consultant by a transparent bidding process. The appointed authority may be a Consulting Engineering Firm of body of Corporate being consultants. The Independent Consultant is initially appointed for a period of30 months which may later be extended to 3 years after expiry of aforesaid appointment. The Independent Consultant must report (at least once in a month) to MPRDC.The remuneration, cost and expenses shall be borne by the Concessionaire during Construction Period, up to 1.3% of the project construction cost. This cost is to be paid in 4 instalments. Also during Toll Period, the supervising cost is borne by Concessionaire equal to Rs. 15000 per crores of Total Project Cost per year. This cost is to be paid in 6 instalments.Financing arrangements financial closure:The concessionaire shall provide a copy of Financing Package to MPRDC. If anything in this agreement contained is contrary, financial closure must be attained within 180 days.Grant/subsidy:MPRDC agrees to pay to the Concessionaire Grant/Subsidy as cash support equal to the Bid of Bidder and accepted by MPRDC namely Rs. 81 crores. Out of the grant for project up to 20% of Total Project Cost is provided by Government of India, rest is disbursed by MPRDC.First tranche of 20% id released when the Concessionaire has contributed his equity as per proposed financing package. MPRDC is given 7 days to process disbursement request. If MPRDC fails to disburse any tranche within 30 days of acceptance of request, it has to pay an interest @ SBAR plus 2 percent.

Revenue shortfall loan:If the Realizable fees in any Accounting Year during the Concession Period shall fall below the Subsistence Revenue Level, MPRDC agrees to allow the Concessionaire to avail accommodation for such shortfall, by the way of loan from Bank. Any balance of maintenance fund of the Concessionaire or any sums received or likely to be received by the Concessionaire through claims or payments by MPRDC shall first be deducted and only the balance amount should be availed as Revenue Shortfall Loan.In order to get the loan under such circumstances the Concessionaire should submit a detailed account of event and its impact on total revenues, as soon as possible. Within 15 days of close of accounting year in which the shortfall is observed, the Concessionaire shall provide a certificate from the Statutory Auditors certifying Subsistence Revenue Level, Realisable Fees and the Revenue Shortfall requirement after deducting the reserves of the Concessionaire.The Revenue Shortfall Loan and the interest shall be repaid by the Concessionaire before termination of Concession Period, in sum equal to 50% of net cash flow.Escrow account:The Concessionaire should open an account within 30 days of this agreement in which all the funds constituting the Financing Package for meeting Total Cost shall be credited. MPRDC possess rights to make deductions and appropriations from this account.Escrow Account, during Concession period is funded by: Deposits by GOI, MPRDC as grants/subsidy. Instalments of the loans by lenders as performance disbursement schedule approved by lenders. All fees, after incomes and receivables. All termination payments. All proceeds received from insurance claims.

Insurance:Insurance during the construction period:Insurance under construction period may sum up to a maximum in accordance with financing documents, applicable laws. Such insurance covers the entire cost of the [project as per MPRDC.Insurance during Toll Period:Not later than 4 months prior to the anticipated completion of the project Highway, the Concessionaire should obtain and maintain no cost to MPRDC during Toll Period in respect of the project highway and the usage of the insurance lies in Financing Documents, Applicable Laws.Accounts and audit:The Concessionaire shall maintain full accounts of all fees including Realisable fees and other revenues collected by it from and on account of use of the Project Highway and of the O&M Expenses and other costs paid out of the Escrow Account and shall provide copies of the said accounts duly audited and certified by the Concessionaires Auditors within 180 days of the close of each Accounting Year to which they pertain during subsistence of this agreement.Force Majeure:A Force Majeure event shall mean occurrence in India of any or all of Non Political Event, Indirect Political Event as defined in the clauses respectively in the report which prevent the Party claiming Force Majeure (the Affected Party) from performing its obligations under this agreement and which act or event is:(i) Beyond the reasonable control and not arising out of the fault of the affected party,(ii) The Affected Party has been unable to overcome such act or event by the exercise of due diligence and reasonable efforts, skill and care, including through expenditure of reasonable sums of money, and(iii) Has a Material Adverse Effect on the Project.The clauses pertaining to Effect of Force Majeure Event after Financial Closure, Allocation of Costs during subsistence of Force Majeure and conditions for termination of the agreement .It is also stated that upon termination of the agreement by MPRDC on account of Force Majeure Event, shall if it deems fit, subject to the rights of the lenders under the substitution agreement, substitute another concessionaire to take over the debts and subordinate debts of the Project and maintain the facilities for the balance concession period.Suspension and Termination:The clauses relating to the following categories are discussed under this chapter:a) Material Breach and Suspension - If the concessionaire shall be in the material breach of this agreement, MPRDC shall be entitled to its other rights and remedies under this agreement, including its right of termination hereunder, to suspend all or any of the rights of the concessionaire under this agreement including the concessionaires right to collect and appropriate all Fees and other revenues from the Project Highway and exercise the rights of the concessionaire under this agreement itself or any other person to exercise the same during such suspension.b) Compensation for Breach of Agreement The clause lays down the terms of compensation both for MPRDC as well as the Concessionaire in case of breach of agreement by any or both parties.c) Termination It is divided into the following sub-clauses: Termination for the Concessionaire event of default Termination for MPRDC event of default Other rights and obligations of the MPRDC

Liability and indemnity:The concessionaire shall be entirely responsible for and bear the cost of and shall indemnify, hold MPRDC not liable and defend all proceedings, actions, and third party claims for loss, damage and expense arising out of the design, engineering, construction, procurement, operation, and maintenance of the Project Highway.The concessionaire shall fully indemnify, defend, hold MPRDC not liable including its officers, servants agents and subsidiaries, from and against any loss and damages arising out of or with respect to (a) failure of the concessionaire to comply with applicable laws and applicable permits, (b) payment of taxes or (c) non-payment of amounts due as a result of materials or services furnished to the concessionaire.In defence of their claim, the Indemnified Party shall have the right, but not the obligation, to contest, defend and litigate any claim, action, suit or proceeding by any third party alleged or asserted against such party in respect of, resulting from, related to or arising out of any matter for which it is entitled to be indemnified and their reasonable costs and expenses shall be indemnified by the Indemnified Party.Dispute Resolution:In case of dispute, difference or controversy in relation to the agreement between the parties, the dispute shall be resolved amicably in accordance with the conciliation procedure. The parties may call upon an independent consultant and arrive at a settlement and failing this either party may refer to the Steering Group constituted by MPRDC and the chairman of the Board or directors of the concessionaire and a representative of GoMP. If the dispute is still not resolved then it shall be finally decided by reference to Arbitration by a Board of Arbitrators. The decision relating to any dispute shall be final and binding on the parties as from the date they are made.The concessionaire shall make available for inspection during normal business hours on all working days copies of all records and reports to MPRDC a and when required.Redressal of public grievances:The concessionaire shall maintain a public relations office adjacent to each Toll Plaza and keep it open to public access. It should maintain a register/suggestion box for complaints/suggestions. The complaint shall also be numbered with date and complaint number so that it may be referred for future correspondence. The action taken by the concessionaire should be noted and a reply should be send to the complainant. After each month, the concessionaire shall send to MPRDC a photocopy of the Complaints Register.Miscellaneous:i. Video recordingThe concessionaire shall provide a video recording with date and time to MPRDC every quarter, covering the construction of the Project Highway in that quarter. During the toll period the concessionaire shall prepare the video recording once in a calendar year.ii. SurvivalTermination of the agreement shall not relieve the concessionaire or MPRDC of any obligations which expressly or by implication survives termination and it shall not relieve either party of any obligations or liabilities for loss or damage to the other Party arising out of such termination.iii. NoticesAny notice or other communication between parties shall be done by a letter delivered by hand to the address of the person in charge in the case of the concessionaire whereas in the case of MPDRC, the letter delivered by hand shall be addressed to the chairman, MPRDC. The copies of all notices should be sent by facsimile and shall also be sent to the MPRDC representative.iv. Advertisement on siteThe concessionaire shall not undertake or permit any form of commercial advertising, display or hoarding at any place if such advertising shall be visible to the users while driving on highway thus distracting them. This restriction shall not apply to the toll plaza, rest areas, bus shelters and telephone booths located on the project highway if the advertisement does not distract the users.v. SeverabilityIf for any reason, any provision of this agreement is or becomes invalid, illegal or unenforceable or is declared by any court as same then the validity, legality or enforceability of the remaining provisions shall not be affected in any manner, and the parties will negotiate with a view to agreeing one or more provisions which may be substituted for such invalid, unenforceable or illegal provisions.vi. No partnershipNothing contained in this agreement shall be construed or interpreted as constituting a partnership between the parties. Neither party shall have any authority to bind the other in any manner whatsoever.vii. languageAll notices required to be given by one party to the other party and all other communications, documentation and proceedings which are in any way relevant to this agreement shall be in writing and in English language.

3.3SWOT Analysis:From the point of view of Public Private Partnership in Highway projects, this project is one of the bricks in the building of mutual participation of Government and Private Sectors to achieve developmental goals which are beneficial for them as well as the general public. To analyse the pros and cons of the project under PPP, SWOT Analysis of the Bhopal-Dewas corridor (built on BOT-basis) as under.

Strength: Involvement of the Private sector leads to greater efficiency, this can be seen from the fact that the concession agreement for the project is signed on June 30, 2007, the construction started on January 1, 2008 and it was completed on December 31, 2009. That means, approximately 0.2 KM of road was constructed per day. Since the corridor is under the control of concessionaire for the next 30 years, hence the responsibility of its operation and maintenance is only of the concessionaire and the government is exempted from the burden of extra staff and machinery required for the same. The initial grant given by the government to the concessionaire provided a boost to the morale of the concessionaire and also made him more responsible for the project.

Weakness: The Concessionaire is a consortium of 4 companies and theres a huge susceptibility to mutual contention. A sudden increment in traffic inflow rate will tremendously benefit the private entity and adversely affect the public partner. Lack of proper legal framework and institutionalized standard approach.

Opportunities: The successful completion of the project shall ensure many more such endeavours in the future. Highway development projects in India require a huge investment of 6 lakh crores INR. Successful projects like these are necessary to attract the much needed investment. The gap between inception and implementation of public services is finally bridged by the tool of PPP.

Threats: Lack of cohesive approach at government level owing to lot of red-tapism etc. in the government machinery. Corruption in the form of extortion and other such illegitimate actions may creep in the system in the long run. The possibility of the formation of any type of nexus between contracting parties and political agents will lead to loss of faith in the PPP and prove detrimental to its true character.

Chapter 4. ConclusionsThe Methodology of Public Private Partnership in highways is based on capitalizing the private sectors strength and minimising shortcomings of public sector in the execution of work.PPP enhances efficiency of work to a higher limit. Certain minimum standards and norms have been setup by the agency which is being updated from time to time to meliorate the level of work. Likewise coin, PPP has its own pros and cons. One of the pros is the low risk involvement on part of public sector but it is opposite in case of private sector. As work is performed by private sector and the sole responsibility from the beginning to completion of project is shared by one party or a group of companies, the execution is better as compared to that performed by public sector, because there is involvement of money of individuals in the project.In concise notes all the menaces are put in the sack of private sector and all the credits are credited to public sector. But the success from the principle of PPP is creditable as outcomes of result are far better. As per records available not only to the quality of the pavements have improved drastically, but the life-span or so called the service period of highways has also increased considerably. Even though, the pros of PPP in highways outweighs its cons but still the shortcomings should be notified and the rectification of the same will surely further enhance the efficiency of PPP projects. The interest of private sector is certainly a vital component in successful execution of PPP projects. This interest has been given a boost in terms of perks awarded to agencies showing interest as well as participation in the PPP projects. Policies of PPP accounts for contents ranging from every minute detail to completion of all the vital steps in execution in maintenance part of project. All the inadequacies have been set aside in the formulation of PPP policies. There has been conceptualisation of tender policy, operation, maintenance and finally transfer of assets to the government. Various authorities are appointed for inspection and audits to the work place for testing the execution of work and justifying whether norms and standards have been enforced or not.Among the shortcomings, very few aspects have come into notice. The entailment of such strict provisions may create a setback and exasperation in the mind of private sector, in case better prospects are available to them at other places. Also the exaltation to the developers must be given a hike in terms of better facilities to them.After scrutinising the details of PPP, it can be concluded that PPP is a powerful tool in approaching future and can serve better among all the available methodologies. But at the end, its ones wit which certainly serves a final decision making about any and every available scheme.4.

Chapter 5. References1. The world bank, report on India : Building capacities for Public- Private Partnership, Energy and Infrastructure Unit and Finance and Private Sector Development Unit, South Asia region, June 2006, p. 13.

2. Savas E.S., Privatisation and Public - Private Partnerships, Affiliated- east west press. Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, 2001.

3. Noorjahan Bava. Public Interest and Public Policy, in R.B Jain, (Ed.), public services in a democratic context, New Delhi, Indian Institute of Public Administration, 1983, pp. 166-178.

4. India: Addressing Constraints to Infrastructure Financing (Washington DC), World Bank. 2005.

5. Dissertation on "Financing of National Highways in India by A. P. Bahadur, Chief Engineer, Department of Road Transport and Highways, Ministry of Shipping, Road Transport & Highways.

6. R. Thandvan and Kalaichdvi Sivaraman Public- Private Partnership within Policy Framework, the Indian journal of public administration, Vol. LIV, No. 1, January-March, 2008, p. 21.

7. Presentation on Public - Private Partnerships in Highway, Punjab, India by Kulvinder Singh Rao, Deputy Project director, Punjab roads & Bridges development Board.

8. Guidelines for Investment in Road Sector Government of India Ministry of Road Transport and Highways.

9. Dissertation on Global Experiences of Public Private Partnership for Highway Development by Shunso Tsukada.

10. Report on "Technical Assistance To The Democratic Socialist Republic Of Sri Lanka For Preparing A Public-Private Partnership Expressway Project, September 2003 by L. Weidner, private sector development specialist, South Asia Transport and Communications Division (project team leader); S.W Handayani; and D. Utami.

11. PPP Toolkit for "Public Private Partnership in India" by Ministry of Finance, Government of India. Source website : http://www.pppinindia.com/

12. Department of Road Transport and Highways, Ministry of Shipping, Road Transport and Highways (http://morth.nic.in), National Highways Authority of India (http://www.nhai.org)

13. CDDRL Working Papers on "Distribution of Highways Public Private Partnerships in India: Key Legal and Economic Determinants" September 2009, TCA Anant & Ram Singh, Delhi School of Economics, University of Delhi, source website: http://cddrl.stanford.edu.

14. Workshop Report, December 2006 on "Facilitating PublicPrivate Partnership for Accelerated Infrastructure Development in India, Regional Workshops of Chief Secretaries on PublicPrivate Partnership, Department of Economic Affairs (DEA) & Ministry of Finance, Government of India.

15. Journal on Partnerships for Urban Infrastructure Development in Delhi, Ashok Kumar (2003), ITPI Journal, Vol. 20.4, No. 2645.