powerpoint mediation project
TRANSCRIPT
Franc v. Morris
Mediation January 21,2016
PartiesPlaintiff: Peter FrancDefendants: Jamie & Kelly Morris
Viking ConstructionStevens Geotechnical, Inc.Conner StevensNicholas Thomas
Statement of Facts• Peter Franc lives downhill from Jamie and Kelly Morris• The Morris’s decided to enlarge the lot and value of their
residence• Construction took place to create a fill slope, three car carport
and a swimming pool at the Morris residence• Stevens and Thomas admitted to deviating from approved plans• Contrary to the original plans Stevens and Thomas proceeded
with a new plan at the request of the owners
• This would expand the flat land, increase the value, and worth of the land• The project of this litigation is located in Santa Clara County• Approval was not given from the Town because the changes did in
fact violate the building code• The Town issued many warnings, letters and memoranda stating
their concern• The incident pertaining to litigation happened on February 2, 1998
• Because of days of lengthy and fairly intensive rainfall created a landslide onto Franc’s property• The landslide was filled with water, mud, tree and brush debris,
ran directly from the fill slope of the Morris’s residence• The slide also contained highly toxic poison oak, which has
infected the Franc• Franc also suffered severe damages to his property and residence
which does host his stored business furniture and items
First Cause of Action:Negligence/ Res Ipsa Loquitur
Moss
Slope
Morris Residence
Cleaning Tools
Mud
Water
• Date: May 7, 1998• To: Karen• From: David Jones• The letter shows Connor directed Nick
Jones to rebuild the embankment as it was originally placed.
Blister Blister
Burn
• Date: September 15, 1995 • To: Kelly and Jamie Morris• From: Steven Geotechnical, Inc.• This report identifies the geographical hazards at
the property and it provides recommendations for design and construction of a new home on the site.
Second Cause of Action:Premises Liability
Plastic cover
Slope
Sand bags
• Date: August 14, 1996• To: Mr. & Mrs. Morris• From: Terrastudies• During the heavy rains this past winter,
the soils comprising the lower end of the fill prism mobilized as a debris flow and washed down the ravine.
Garage Franc Residence
Landscape
Tree Branches
Mud
Brush Debris
Mud Water
Tree Debris
Third Cause of Action: Claim Against Governmental Entity
Drainage Pipes
Slope
Mud
• To: Kelly & Jamie Morris• From: Karen Patton• I do however gave some concerns with
the grading that has taken place to the south and southwest of the proposed carport. There appears to be much more fill in this vicinity than shown in the approved grading plan.
Mud
Chemicals
Tree
Mud Mold
Brush Debris
• Date: September 1995 • To: Kelly & Jamie Morris• From: Steven Geotechnical, Inc.• Geotechnical evaluated the potential
geological hazards influencing the proposed new residence and develop soil and foundation recommendations for the project.
Actual Damages• Replace drywall and flooring $ 12,000.00• Property Damages 700,000.00•Medical bills 100,000.00• Landscaping 150,000.00• Toxic Waste Removal 38,000.00
• Total $1,000,000.00
Punitive Damages• Devaluation of property $ 750,000.00• Business Damages 150,000.00• Lost wages 100,000.00• Pain and Suffering 1,000,000.00
• Total $ 2,000,000,.00
Request for Settlement
$3,000,000.00