post survey report - california

EARTH SCIENCES & SURVEYING EGS AMERICAS, INC.

FIELD OPERATIONS AND COMPLIANCE REPORT for

CALIFORNIA STATE LANDS COMMISSION

GEOPHYSICAL CABLE ROUTE SURVEY

LOS ANGELES, DOCKWEILER BEACH, CALIFORNIA

Revision Date Description Prepared by Revised by Approved by

3/2/2018 Initial EBR EBR

Dockweiler Beach Operations Report EGS Job Number 17-1055

EARTH SCIENCES & SURVEYING EGS AMERICAS, INC.

CONTENTS

1 SURVEY INFORMATION .................................................................. 1-2

Project Description and Scope of Work ...................................................... 1-2

Weather and Sea State ........................................................................... 1-2

Chart of Area and Tracklines ................................................................... 1-3

GIS Trackline File ................................................................................. 1-3

Date and Times of Data Collection ............................................................ 1-3

Environmental Hazards Encountered ......................................................... 1-3

Accident, Injury, Damage, or Loss to Property ............................................. 1-3

2 BIOLOGICAL INFORMATION ............................................................. 2-4

EXHIBIT H – California State Lands Commission ............................................. 2-4

Marine Wildlife Monitoring Report ............................................................. 2-4


EARTH SCIENCES & SURVEYING

1

EGS AMERICAS, INC.

SURVEY INFORMATION

Project Description and Scope of Work

A geophysical inshore corridor survey was completed for a proposed subsea telecommunications cable landing at Dockweiler Beach, Los Angeles. The survey was conducted from the closest, safest working distance to shore out to the 3nm State boundary.

The route survey is required to provide information for engineering, installation, and subsequent maintenance of the cable. The survey objective was to complete the acquisition of inshore geophysical survey data including; bathymetric, sidescan, sub-bottom, and magnetometer data to safely position the cable within a surveyed corridor.

Weather and Sea State

Weather and sea state during survey events are provided in table below:

Date Weather Sea State (Beaufort)

12/11/17 Sunny – 5-8 knts SW (1-2) - <1.0m

12/12/17 Sunny – 5-8 knts NW (1-2) - <1.0m

12/13/17 Sunny – 5-8 knts NW (1-2) - <1.0m



w. E SURVEY TRACKPLOT

s 118°32W 11S'31'W

25 18

23 21

25 21

24 20

26

22 26 23

27

25 23

'8 25

26 24 27

,. 25

" 29

18

20

20

22

23

/3cf---j ~ fAATH SCICNCES &SUillV!YlffG

111l"JOW

13

"

17

16

" 12

18

II

\ ., 16 14

;7 13

18 14

21 16

16 13 12

18 15

17

~ 23 21 19 16 1

~ 25 I i ...-..,.. ...,....,... ..... ..,.....,.....,.....,.....,... -r ..,... 2 1 r ..... ...,....,... -,- l!l ..,.....,... ..... ..,... ..... 1i ..,... ..... .....,3T"...--r~1...--r\ -r --91 ..... -r 9 -.-...- -ti2...-28 ............................... ..,... ..................... 30

29 27

~ n 11 d) 26

't. "0c °2 27

26

2◄

" 22

22

20

19 tky 18

16

15

29 25

32 27 18

27 St~-J1----------- - - - -28

25 ---~ ~- - ~--- ~

30 28 27 24 22

0 33 RESTRICTED AREA

28 26 21 162. 195 (see note A) 24 32 30

29

19

Sou ngs in Feet 11S"31'W 11S"30'W \18'20W

0 1,000 2,000 4,000 Meters

13

14

16

17

12

14

,, s

10,

12

11

s,

{see r,o.,e B) =/1,,

9 suveyo/201 ,, s-~ ~ "

5 \ 13 s 61 s.

12 --.:-10~~8 ~ ... 7 - 6:,.;-,

,,i_- 1,-- 4:":==-: Oo,Jrr(< . 7~,/ 118"2:llW

EGS AMERICAS, INC.

Chart of Area and Tracklines

GIS Trackline File

An ESRI compatible trackline file accompanies this report. WGS84 Geodetic

Date and Times of Data Collection

The data collection summary was taken from the final survey Daily Progress Reports (DPRs). The following table gives the breakdown of dates and data collection times:

Date Start Data Collection (Local) End Data Collection

12/11/17 09:45 16:50

12/12/17 07:52 16:30

12/13/17 08:01 14:53

Environmental Hazards Encountered

No environmental hazards were encountered.

Accident, Injury, Damage, or Loss to Property

No accidents, injuries, damage, or loss to property was sustained.



2

EGS AMERICAS, INC.

BIOLOGICAL INFORMATION

This section includes Marine Wildlife Monitoring Report with field operations summary including sonar equipment shut downs and start-ups, haul out behaviour, and number of collisions.

EXHIBIT H – California State Lands Commission

Below see initialled and dated Exhibit H:

Marine Wildlife Monitoring Report

See Marine Wildlife Monitoring Post-Survey Report below prepared by Marine Mammal Consulting Group.


MARINE MAMMAL CON, ULTING GROUP INC.

MARINE WILDLIFE MITIGATION REPORT

Shallow Water Fiber-optic Cable Survey

Dockweiler State Beach, California

prepared for:

California State Lands Commission

Division of Environmental Planning and Management

100 Howe Street, Suite 100 South

Sacramento, CA 95825-8202

and

EGS Americas, Inc.

111 Second Avenue NE, Suite 900

St. Petersburg, FL 33701

prepared by:

Peter Howorth

Peter Howorth Marine Mammal Consulting Group

1600 Clearview Road Santa Barbara, California 93101

U.S.A.

December 2017

Table of Contents

1.0 Executive Summary 1 2.0 Survey Equipment and Route 2

2.1 Survey Vessel 2

2.2 Sonar 2

2.3 Survey Route 4

3.0 Mitigation Monitoring Measures 5

3.1 Briefing 6

3.2 Watches 6

3.3 Equipment 6

3.4 Communications 6

3.5 Data Recording 6

4.0 Results 7

4.1 Marine Mammal Sightings 7

4.2 Avoidance of Marine Mammal – Cable Survey Interactions 8

4.3 Reactions of Marine Mammals to Operations 8

4.4 Pinniped Haul-outs and Rookeries 8

4.5 Sea Otter and Turtle Sightings 8

4.6 Birds 8

4.7 Marine Protected Areas 9

4.8 Environmental Conditions 9

5.0 Reporting 9

6.0 Conclusions and Recommendations 10

7.0 Acknowledgements 10

6.0 Literature Cited 10

Tables

Table 1: Survey Equipment Specifications 3

Table 2: Occurrence of Marine Mammals and Turtles in Region 8

Figures

Figure 1: US–South America Cable Route 1

Figure 2: Survey Vessel JAB 3

Figure 3: Lowering the Sonar Towfish 4

Figure 4: Shallow Water Cable Survey Route 5

~ Marine Mammal Consulting Group, Inc.

Appendix 1:

Marine Wildlife Mitigation Measures 11

Measures for Crew to Avoid Potential Collisions 11

Measures for Monitor to Avoid Potential Collisions 11

Measures for Monitor to Avoid Potential Entanglements 13

Zones of Influence for Sonar Operations 14

Measures for Crew to Avoid Potential Sonar Impacts 14

Measures for Monitor to Avoid Potential Sonar Impacts 14

Measures Avoid Potential Impacts from Oil or Fuel Releases 15

Avoidance of Pinniped Haul-outs and Rookeries 15

Marine Mammal Consulting Group, Inc.

Marine Wildlife Mitigation Report, US-South America Fiber-optic Cable Survey, Dockweiler Beach, California Page 1

1.0 Executive Summary

This project involved a shallow water survey part of a proposed submarine cable route off

Southern California. Once the entire cable is installed, it will stretch from Dockweiler State

Beach, California, to South America, hence its designation as US-South America (Figure 1). Off

the California coast, the cable route crosses submerged lands from mean high water to

3 nautical miles (nm) offshore, then stretches into federal waters and beyond into international

waters. This survey identified the makeup of the ocean floor within California State waters,

including hard bottom areas, so such areas could be avoided when the cable is actually laid. In

general, the surveyed route will place the cable in soft bottom areas where maximum burial can

be achieved. Low-energy sonar was used for this survey.

Source: EGS

Figure 1: US-South America Cable Route

Regulatory agencies at federal and state level were concerned that survey operations might harm marine wildlife. In particular, a potential for collision between the survey vessel and marine mammals and turtles existed. Potential impacts on marine wildlife from sonar noise



were also of concern. The agencies were also concerned about entanglement of marine wildlife

in the sonar tow cable, and to a much lesser extent, in cables used to deploy various devices.

Finally, the agencies wanted to be assured that proper procedures were followed in the unlikely

event of an oil or fuel release.

EGS Americas, Inc. (EGS), an international group of survey firms, was selected to perform the

survey. The Marine Mammal Consulting Group, Inc. (MMCG), of Santa Barbara, California, was

selected to prepare and implement a Marine Wildlife Protection Plan (MMCG 2017), following

the guidance for preparing such documents CSLC 2015), and to report on the results of the

wildlife monitoring effort.

This report provides background on the cable route and survey schedule. It describes the

mitigation monitoring methods, including briefings, watch schedules, equipment used by the

monitor, communications, data recording, and reporting procedures. In the results section, the

marine wildlife sightings are listed by species and include numbers of animals observed,

location, behavior, and other relevant information. Anecdotal sightings of other wildlife are also

discussed. The conclusions and recommendations section summarizes the effectiveness of the

monitoring and makes recommendations for similar future projects. This report includes

literature citations.

To make this a stand-alone document, yet to avoid repetition of subjects already covered in the

Marine Wildlife Protection Plan (MMCG 2017), an appendix is provided that reiterates mitigation

measures discussed in the plan and employed for the protection of marine wildlife.

The survey vessel JAB was used for the survey. After a preliminary briefing, the marine

mammal observer from MMCG boarded the boat each day at King Harbor, in Redondo Beach,

California. JAB began testing and calibration at the site on 11 December, then began

surveying. This project was completed on 13 December, requiring three days on site to

complete. A total of four species of marine mammals was observed. The total number of

animals seen was 295. No impacts were observed on any wildlife. The monitoring effort was

effective.

2.0 Survey Equipment and Route

2.1 Survey Vessel

The 44 ft. (13.4 m) catamaran JAB (Figure 1) was used for the shallow water survey. JAB was

powered by twin Cummins diesels. It has a draft of 2.5 ft. (0.75 m). It was propelled by twin jet

drives and had no propellers or other exposed moving parts beneath the waterline.



2.2 Sonar

Multiple low- and mid-frequency sonar arrays used by the Navy, as well as high-energy seismic

surveys involving the use of airguns, have raised significant concerns about anthropogenic

sounds and their impacts on marine wildlife (Carretta et al. 2017). The sonar that was used for

this survey is low energy and generally much higher in frequency (see Table 1, below).

Source: EGS

Figure 2: Survey Vessel JAB

Table 1: Survey Equipment Specifications

Hull-mounted System Rms Source Level (dB re. 1ɥPa – m)

Frequency (kHz)

Max. Ping Rate (Hz)

Pulse Length

Distances to Isopleths in Meters (dB re. 1ɥPa – rms)

R2Sonics 2024 (160°swath) 221 200-400 60 15-1000 us 190 dB: 26 and 19 180 dB: 57 and 35 160 dB: 164 and 80

Sub-bottom Profiler Towed System

Edgetech DSS2000 Chirp (24°cone) 202 2-16 10 20ms 190 dB: 6 180 dB: 10 160 dB: 130

Sidescan Sonar Towed System

Edgetech DSS2000 LF (100°swath) 213 120 25 N/A 190 dB: 13 180 dB: 51 160 dB: 210

Edgetech DSS2000HF (100°swath) 219 410 50 N/A 190 dB: 9 180 dB: 39 160 dB: 160

Sonardyne 8071 Ultra Short Baseline (USBL; cone)

188 19-36 14 N/A

Source: EGS

~ Merine Mammal Consulting Group, Inc.


Figure 3: Lowering the Sonar Towfish

NOAA Fisheries has established guidelines establishing noise thresholds at which some

impacts may be experienced by various groups of marine mammals. Based on the above

specifications, a very conservative hazard zone was established (Appendix 1) that would ensure

that no harassment or injury to any group of marine mammals could occur (NOAA 2016).

2.3 Survey Route

This survey headed from shore to the west. (The deep water phase continued west, then

south.) The start of this survey was at 33 56.5449 North, 118 26.8118 West. The end of this

survey was at 33 56.8743 North, 118 31.2861 West.

Rather than a box, the survey area was more like a very long corridor about 500 m wide. If

obstructions such as areas of high relief had been encountered, the survey was widened slightly

to get around such spots. Based on the results, the in-field routing engineer decided during the

survey if the Route Position List (RPL), which represented the center of the cable route, needed

Legend

-- Seg1 LAX-BU1

c::::::J 500m Corridor

2 1

" ,c ""

\ 25

25

27

29

0.5

""

26 2-1

/ Three-Nibtical-Mile Line / 2G 2 2

2 5



to be adjusted within the survey corridor. Once the engineer was satisfied no cable hazards

existed, a new RPL, called the In-Field Engineered Route, was created.

Source: EGS

Figure 4: Shallow Water Cable Survey Route

3.0 Mitigation Monitoring Methods

3.1 Briefings

The Marine Wildlife Protection Plan (MMCG 2017) and data sheets were provided to the MMCG

monitor for review and familiarization before the project began. A briefing was held between

MMCG’s principal scientist and the monitors to discuss mitigation monitoring methods. The

monitor provided the survey crew in advance with the Marine Wildlife Protection Plan, along with

lists of methods to be employed by them to avoid adverse impacts on marine wildlife.

Consultations were held in advance between MMCG and EGS to review sonar ramp-up

procedures. Before the vessel left port, the monitor met in person with the crew. The meeting

included the following topics:

Legal aspects pertaining to marine wildlife protection;

Responsibilities of crew and monitor to protect wildlife;

Procedures for crew to follow to avoid potential impacts;



Marine wildlife most likely to be encountered during the survey;

Copies of the Marine Wildlife Protection Plan were always available to all crew

members.

3.2 Watches

A continuous watch was kept from port en route to the survey area, within the survey area, and

from the survey area back to port. Watches were held on the bridge, which allowed ready

access for observations in every direction.

3.3 Equipment

The monitor was equipped with 7X50 waterproof, low-light, binoculars with a compass and

range-finding reticule for establishing relative bearings and distances of animals from the

vessel. These binoculars were calibrated for range prior to departure from port. The monitor

also had a high-resolution laser rangefinder as well. He was equipped with a handheld GPS

unit as well as with a portable weather measuring device. This device recorded wind speed and

direction as well as temperature. The monitor also had a digital camera.

3.4 Communications

The monitor was equipped with a standard digital cellular telephone with voice mail and text

capabilities. The monitor also carried a handheld marine VHF radio for communications with

other vessels if necessary. This radio also had ship-to-shore capabilities (telephone links). As

a backup, the JAB also had a cellular telephone and a VHF radio with ship-to-shore capabilities.

With these extensive communications capabilities, reliable means of communications were

maintained throughout the project. Reliable communications with many backups are essential

for such operations in case of emergencies.

3.5 Data Recording

All marine wildlife observations were recorded. Data sheets designed for this project included

the date and time of each sighting, the monitor’s name, and the vessel name. The location of each sighting was noted, using the monitor’s handheld GPS. The genus and species of each

animal was mentioned, along with the number of animals. Their behavior was noted, along with

their heading if they were moving. Age categories and sex were noted when possible.

Additional information, such as the direction, range, and bearing of the animal(s) from the

observer, along with its heading, was included. The remarks section included notes as to when

each operation began and ended, and the nature of each operation (e.g., in transit, on station,

ramping up, survey start and end, etc.). Anecdotal information was recorded on other wildlife,

particularly sea birds, along with any association such wildlife had with marine mammals or with

project operations.

Marine Mammal Conoulting Group, Inc.


If an alert were made or action had to be taken to prevent a potentially adverse impact, a

detailed report could be filled out. This both ensured that the effectiveness of such actions

could be analyzed later, but also served as a record of essential information that would be

needed in case an impact actually did occur. These incident reports included:

Date;

Monitor’s name; Vessel name and contact information;

Vessel’s position at time of incident; Onsite weather and sea conditions;

Time animal sighted;

Species;

Number of animals;

Animal’s behavior; Closest distance of animal to vessel;

Type of hazard (e.g., collision, sonar noise, etc.);

Time crew notified;

Time avoidance action implemented;

Time animal definitely clear of hazard;

Time normal operations resumed;

Effectiveness of avoidance action;

Crew’s names and titles; Time CSLC and NOAA Fisheries Service notified (if impact occurred);

Description of action taken:

Names and titles of responding parties;

Photographs taken? Photographer’s name(s); Descriptive narrative of action taken.

Weather data were also recorded and updated hourly throughout each day. These included

date, time, monitor’s name, vessel’s name, and location. Percentage and type of cloud cover

were noted, along with visibility in meters (m) and nautical miles. Percentage and direction of

glare were also noted. Swell direction and height (in meters) were recorded, along with wind

direction and velocity in knots.

4.0 Results

4.1 Marine Mammal Sightings

Marine mammal sightings were relatively sparse, with only four species represented and a total

of 295 animals sighted. No resightings of animals were noted, although some sea lions resting

on the King Harbor entrance buoy may have been resights. No species of marine mammals

were unidentified. Behaviors included resting, slow travel, diving, and feeding in the case of one

sea lion. Considering the number of birds near the animals, it’s likely that other feeding

- Merine Mammal Consulting Group, Inc.


activities happened but were not observed because the animals were underwater. Some of the

dolphins rode the bow of JAB while coming and going to the survey site.

4.2 Avoidance of Marine Mammal – Cable Survey Vessel Interactions

No actions were necessary to prevent adverse impacts to marine wildlife from the survey

operation.

4.3 Reactions of Marine Mammals to Operations

Other than bow-riding dolphins encountered coming to and going from the project site, no

marine mammals reacted to the operation.

Table 2: Occurrence of Marine Mammals in Region

Date California sea lion

Zalophus

californianus c.

Long-beaked common

dolphin

Delphinus capensis

Common bottlenose

dolphin (coastal stock)

Tursiops truncatus. t.)

Humpback whale

Megaptera

novaeangliae

Totals

11 Dec. 41 10 5 1 57

12 Dec. 24 111 0 1 136

13 Dec. 31 71 0 0 102

Totals 96 192 5 2 295

4.4 Pinniped Haul-outs and Rookeries

CSLC requires various mitigation measures to ensure that pinniped haul-out and rookery sites within

or immediately adjacent to survey operations are protected from project activities. No such sites

exist anywhere near the area of operation for this project. CSLC Mitigation Measure BIO-7,

Avoidance of Pinniped Haul-out Sites, does not apply to this project (CSLC 2008 and 2014).

4.5 Sea Otter and Turtle Sightings

No southern sea otters (Enhydra lutris nereis) or turtles were seen.

4.6 Birds

Birds were abundant in the survey area. This suggests abundant prey, particularly small

schooling fish, since most of the birds listed below feed on such fish. Also, the birds were

sometimes seen near sea lions and long-beaked common dolphins, which suggests the marine

mammals were feeding on fish as well.



California brown pelicans (Pelecanus occidentalis californicus)

Western gulls (Larus occidentalis)

California gulls (L. californicus)

Heermann’s gulls (L. heermanni)

Black-legged kittiwakes (Rissa tridactyla)

Black-vented shearwaters (Puffinus opisthomelas)

Forster’s terns (Sterna forsteri)

Common murres (Uria aalge)

Red Phalaropes (Phalaropes fulicarius)

Brandt’s cormorants (Phalacrocorax pencillatus)

Double-crested cormorants (P. auritus)

Surf scoters (Melanitta perspicillata)

Western grebes (Aechmophorus occidentalis)

Eared grebes (Podiceps nigricollis)

Buffleheads (Bucephala albeola)

4.7 Marine Protected Areas

No Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) exist at or near the survey area or transit routes. CSLC

Mitigation Measure BIO-9, Limitations on Survey Operations in Select Marine Protected Areas,

does not apply to this project (CSLC 2014).

4.8 Environmental Conditions

Environmental conditions were very moderate during the three days of the survey. Winds

generally came out of the east to northeast in the mornings, switching to west to west-southwest

in the afternoons. They varied from calm to 8.3 knots. Swell ranged from south, to west-

southwest, to west at 0.1 to 1.0 m. Air temperatures ranged from 15.8 to 27.7 Celsius (60.4 to

80.8 Fahrenheit). Visibility was several miles each day. Glare was minimal because most of

the surveys were done from after sunrise and before sunset. Clouds were high cirrus each day,

with smoke on the last day.

5.0 Reporting

A post survey field operations and compliance report shall be submitted to CSLC as soon as

possible, but no later than 30 days after the survey has been completed (EGS in prep). Among

other subjects, this report shall include:

A summary of marine mammal and turtle species seen during the project;

A summary of environmental conditions;

Descriptions of any incidents during which action had to be taken to avoid adverse

impacts and the effectiveness of such actions.



6.0 Conclusions and Recommendations

The mitigation efforts were successful, with no incidents or impacts reported to marine wildlife,

MMCG recommends continuing such mitigation efforts in future such projects.

7.0 Acknowledgements

MMCG gratefully acknowledges the support and cooperation of EGS and the survey members

and crew of JAB.

8.0 Literature Cited

Carretta, J., K.A. Forney, E. Oleson, D.W. Weller, A.R. Lang, J. Baker, M.M. Muto, B. Hanson,

A.J. Orr, H. Huber, M.S. Lowry, J. Barlow, J. Moore, D. Lynch, L. Carswell, and R.L.

Brownell, Jr. 2017. U.S. Pacific Marine Mammal Stock Assessments, 2016. NOAA,

NMFS. NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-SWFSC-577. June 2017.

CSLC. 2008. General Permit to Conduct Geophysical Surveys. Blank form showing permit

conditions, 18 July 2008.

CSLC. 2014. Exhibit H, Mitigation Monitoring Program, updated 23 April 2014.

CSLC. 2015. Guidance for Developing a Marine Wildlife Contingency Plan.

EGS. In preparation. Post survey field operations and compliance report, Dockweiler Beach

shallow water fiber-optic cable survey.

MMCG. 2017. Marine Wildlife Protection Plan, fiber-optic Cable Survey off Dockweiler Beach,

California. Revised November 2017.

NOAA. 2016. Technical Guidance for Assessing the Effects of Anthropogenic Sound on

Marine Mammal Hearing. Underwater Acoustic Thresholds for Onset of Permanent and

Temporary Threshold Shifts. NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-OPR-55, July.

Merine Memm□I Conaulting Group, Inc.


Appendix 1: Marine Wildlife Mitigation Measures

Measures for Crew to Avoid Potential Collisions (Ship Strikes)

The captain and crew were given hard copies of the following procedures to be employed while

in transit or during surveys:

Maintain a watch for marine mammals and turtles at all times while vessel is underway;

Do not approach any whales closer than 100 m;

Do not cut in front of a whale;

Do not separate a whale mother and calf pair;

If a whale is observed on an intersect course, reduce speed or alter course until the

whale has safely passed;

If a whale is moving on a parallel course, maintain a steady speed and course but do not

go faster than the whale;

If a whale becomes evasive or defensive, stop the vessel until the whale has left the

area;

Maintain a cruising speed of not more than 10 knots when whales are within 1 nm

ahead;

If concentrations of whales are seen less than 1 nm ahead, reduce transit speed further

or alter course while maintaining watch on the whales;

While under way at cruising speed, provide a wide berth from any pinnipeds or turtles;

If dolphins begin riding the bow wave of the boat less than 1 nm from the project site,

slow down or stop until the animals have left. It is understood that dolphins often ride

bow and stern wakes, so no action is necessary while transiting from port up to within 1

nm from the project site.

Measures for Monitor to Avoid Potential Collisions (Ship Strikes)

The methods employed by the monitor to avoid ship strikes during transits included:

A NOAA Fisheries-approved monitor shall be on watch during all transits and surveys;

The monitor shall have a 360-degree view of the water;

If environmental conditions (e.g., high sea state) preclude the monitor from seeing out at

least 1 nm, the monitor shall require available personnel to maintain heightened

vigilance for any approaching marine mammals or turtles;

All crew members shall be briefed so they know to report any whale sightings to the

monitor immediately;

Such personnel shall have means of immediately communicating any sightings to the

monitor;

If environmental conditions preclude the monitor from seeing at least 100 m from the

vessel, the vessel shall slow to 10 knots or less until visual conditions improve;

The monitor shall maintain verbal communications with the crew at all times;



The monitor shall have the authority to stop all project activities if, in his sole opinion,

project operations have the potential to threaten or “take” a marine mammal; The monitor has sole responsibility for determining whether a collision appears

imminent, to request that steps be taken to prevent any collision, to determine when any

chance of an collision has passed, and to request that the vessel be returned to normal

operations following a potential collision;

If a marine mammal or turtle appears to be approaching the boat while underway, the

monitor shall make the crew aware that actions to reduce the possibility of collision may

be necessary;

It is understood that smaller marine mammals, such as dolphins, routinely approach

vessels closely and may even ride the bow wake. The approach of such animals will not

require taking action to avoid them unless, in the opinion of the monitor, action is

necessary to prevent adverse impacts;

If a collision appears imminent, the monitor shall request that the speed of the vessel, if

it is underway, be reduced as quickly and as much as possible;

If a collision appears imminent, the monitor shall position himself in the best possible

vantage point for helping the crew avoid the collision while still maintaining

communications with the crew;

If a collision is likely, the monitor shall request that available crew members take up

observation positions to help report sightings to the monitor so that appropriate actions

may be taken to avoid any impact. Such crew members shall have means of

immediately communicating with the monitor;

In the unlikely event that a collision does occur, the monitor or captain shall immediately

notify appropriate regulatory agencies. The date, time, and place of collision, vessel

name, owner and operator, immediate contact information, species involved, status of

animal, heading of animal if animal is moving, and onsite weather, sea conditions, and

visibility shall be provided. Digital photographs of animal shall be taken, showing as

much detail as possible, and immediately sent to the regulatory agencies;

A verbal report shall be followed by a written report;

Reports shall be communicated to the federal and state agencies listed below:

Federal:

Justin Viezbicke

California Stranding Network Coordinator

NOAA Fisheries

Long Beach, California 90802

(562) 980-3230 office

(562) 506-4317 cell

(808) 313-2803 alternate cell

[email protected]

mailto:[email protected]

Merine Mammal Consulting Group, Inc.


Justin Greenman

Assistant Stranding Network Coordinator

NOAA Fisheries

(562) 980-3264 office

(562) 506-4315 cell

[email protected]

State:

California Department of Fish & Wildlife

Long Beach, California 90802

(562) 590-5132

California State Lands Commission

Division of Environmental Planning and Management

Sacramento, California

(916) 574-0748

[email protected]

California Coastal Commission

Energy, Ocean Resources, and Federal Consistency Division

Attn. Kate Huckelbridge, Ph.D.

45 Fremont Street, Suite 2000

San Francisco, California 94105

In some instances, the survey vessel may be engaged in operations at the survey site that do

not involved sonar, such as performing conductivity – temperature – depth (CTD) casts to

measure sound propagation properties of the water at various depths and locations, or to obtain

sediment samples from the sea floor. During such operations, the above measures used to

avoid collisions, and the measures discussed below to avoid entanglements, shall be employed.

Measures for Monitor to Avoid Potential Entanglements

Though not stipulated as a CSLC requirement, NOAA Fisheries had the following requirements

to avoid potential entanglements of marine wildlife in the tow cable for the sonar:

During surveys, the scope in the tow cable shall be reduced as much as practicable;

If essential to avoid a possible entanglement, the towed sonar shall be retrieved;

In the unlikely event that a marine mammal does become entangled in the cable, the

monitor shall request that power to the cable be shut down as soon as possible;

The monitor and crew shall take digital still and video photographs of the entangled

animal, showing as much detail as possible;

In the event of an entanglement, NOAA Fisheries shall be immediately notified as

described above. Digital or still photographs of the entanglement shall be sent

electronically to the Stranding Coordinator;

Based on the report and photography, the Stranding Coordinator may dispatch a marine

mammal rescue team to the scene in an independent vessel;





The officer in charge of survey operations shall be consulted for advice as to what

actions would be safe or possible for his personnel to perform (e.g., slacking or cutting

the cable) in the event of a disentanglement effort;

It is understood that personnel safety concerns or weather and sea conditions may

prevent any action; nonetheless, every reasonable effort shall be made to safely

disentangle any animal;

Immediately following completion of the disentanglement effort, an additional verbal

report shall be made to the regulatory agencies, followed by a written report.

As a professional courtesy, the monitors shall report any marine mammals or turtles that are

observed tangled in fishing gear, mooring lines, and other materials not connected with this

project, following the above notification procedures. If possible, the monitor should take photos

of the entangled animal and immediately relay them to NOAA Fisheries.

Zones of Influence for Sonar Operations

MMCG found in numerous past projects that “safety zone” was often misinterpreted to mean that anything within a safety zone was not in danger (e.g., “The whale is in the safety zone, so it must be safe.”). To avoid confusion and misunderstandings, we used “hazard zone,” meaning that anything within the hazard zone was in danger. For this survey, CSLC’s recommendations

were adopted, establishing a 600 m hazard zone for the survey (not to be confused with the 100

m hazard zone for transits, above).

A 1000 m buffer or warning zone was also implemented for the surveys. This allowed the

monitor to warn survey personnel that marine wildlife were near or approaching the hazard

zone, placing the crew on alert that measures might have to be implemented to protect wildlife

(see below).

Measures for Crew to Avoid Potential Sonar Impacts

Inspect and maintain equipment to ensure proper working order and adherence to

manufacturer’s specifications; When using the sub-bottom profiler, use the highest frequency band possible;

When using either the sidescan sonar or the sub-bottom profiler, use the shortest

possible pulse length and the lowest possible pulse rate;

Apply these measures to other equipment (e.g., boomers) when feasible;

Each piece of equipment shall be started at the lowest possible sound level, increasing

power in increments of no greater than 6 dB every five minutes so that any undetected

marine mammals in the area can leave before full power is attained.

Merine Mammal Consulting Group, Inc.


Measures for Monitor to Avoid Potential Sonar Impacts

Monitoring shall be conducted during the surveys from the highest possible vantage

point, using range-finding binoculars to ensure that the hazard zone is maintained;

The monitor shall observe the warning and hazard zones for at least 15 minutes prior to

ramping up power to the equipment;

The monitor shall request that operations be stopped if marine mammals or turtles are

about to enter or have entered the 600 m hazard zone and may be negatively affected

by survey operations;

If an animal’s behavior is irregular, the monitor shall request that operations be stopped until the animal has left the area or has not been seen for 15 minutes;

Whenever the equipment is restarted, the ramp-up period described above must again

be initiated.

Measures to Avoid Potential Impacts from Oil or Fuel Releases

The EGS survey vessel JAB was equipped with oil spill containment equipment and had an

established, approved oil spill contingency plan in place for dealing with any releases of fuel,

lubricants, or chemicals. In order to respond in the unlikely event of an oil or fuel release, the

following measures shall be taken:

In the event a marine mammal or turtle becomes oiled, the monitor shall immediately

notify NOAA Fisheries, listed above, the U.S. Coast Guard, the Office of Spill Prevention

and Response (OSPR), and the Oiled Wildlife Care Network (OWCN), listed below;

In the event a sea bird becomes oiled, the monitor shall immediately contact the U.S.

Coast Guard, OSPR, and OWCN so that a rescue procedure can be worked out. If

requested and if feasible, crew members may be allowed to rescue oiled sea birds and

arrange for swift transport to the nearest authorized care center;

The regulatory agencies shall be kept apprised of any such rescue efforts and provided

with verbal and written reports once such efforts are complete.

U.S. Coast Guard

Eleventh Coast Guard District

(562) 499-5330

California Department of Fish and Wildlife Office of Spill Prevention and Response (OSPR)

(800) 852-7550

University of California, Davis

School of Veterinary Medicine

Oiled Wildlife Care Network (OWCN)

(877) 823-6926



Avoidance of Pinniped Haul-outs and Rookeries

CSLC requires various mitigation measures to ensure that pinniped haul-out and rookery sites

within or immediately adjacent to survey operations are protected from project activities. No

such sites existed anywhere near the area of operation for this project. CSLC Mitigation

Measure BIO-7, Avoidance of Pinniped Haul-out Sites, did not apply to this project (CSLC 2008

and 2014).

EXHIBIT H Mitig_ation Monitoring Program

Mitigation Measure (MM)

Location and Scope of Mitigation Effectiveness

Criteria Monitoring or

Reporting Action Responsible

Party Timing

Implementation Date(s) and

Initials Air Quafitv and Greenhouse Gas (GHGJ Emissions (MND Section 3.3.3) MM AIR-1: Engine All Counties: Maintain all construction equipment in Daily Determine engine OGPP permit Prior to, Tuning, Engine Certification, and Fuels. The following measures

proper tune according to manufacturers' specifications; fuel all off-road and portable diesel-powered equipment with California Air Resources Board (CARB)-certified motor vehicle diesel fuel limiting sulfur content to 15 parts

emissions of criteria pollutants during survey

certification of vessel engines.

Review engine

holder and contract vessel operator;

during, and after survey activities.

r2--/,q / 17 ,Se___

wi ll be required to per million or less (CARS Diesel). activities are emissions data to California be implemented by all Permittees

minimized. assess compliance, determine if changes

State Lands Commission

Submit Final

under the Offshore in tuning or fuel are (CSLC) Monitoring Geophysical Permit Program (OGPP), as applicable depending on the county offshore which a survey is being conducted. Pursuant to section 93118.5 ofCARB's Airborne Toxic Control Measures, the Tier 2 engine requirement applies only to diesel-fueled vessels.

Los Angeles and Orange Counties: Use vessel engines meeting CARB's Tier 2-certified engines or cleaner; the survey shall be operated such that daily NO, emissions do not exceed 100 pounds based on engine certification emission factors. This can be accomplished with Tier 2 engines if dai ly fuel use is 585 gallons or less, and with Tier 3 engines if dai ly fuel use is 935 gallons or less.

San Luis Obispo County: Use vessel engines meeting CARB's Tier 2-certified engines or cleaner, accomplished with Tier 2 engines 11 daily fL1el use 1s 585 gallons or less; all diesel equipment shall not idle for more than 5 minutes; engine use needed to maintain position 111 the water is not considered idling; diesel idling wit111n 300 meters (1,000 feet) of sensitive receptors is not permitted; use alternatively fueled construction equipment on site

reauired. Verify that Tier 2 or cleaner engines are being used.

Calculate daily NO, emissions to verify compliance with limitations. Verify that Tier 2 or cleaner engines are being used.

Inform vessel operator(s) of id ling limitation.

Investigate

review of Final Monitoring Report.

Report after completion of survey activities.

12/o,(r7 uz__

,.,,,--

where feasible, such as compressed natural gas, liquefied avai lability of natural gas, propane or biodiesel. alternative fuels. Santa Barbara County: Use vessel engines meeting Verify that Tier 2 or CARB's Tier 2-certified engines or cleaner, accomplished cleaner engines are with Tier 2 engines if daily fue l use is 790 gallons or less. being used. ---Investigate

availability of alternative fuels.

Ventura County: Use alternatively fueled construction equipment on site where feasible, such as compressed

Investigate availability of -

natural aas, liauefied natural gas, propane or biodiesel. alternative fuels.

Updated: 04/23/201 4

EXHIBIT H Mitigation Monitoring Program

ImpiementationResponsibleMonitoring orEffectivenessMitigation Timing Date(s) andLocation and Scope of Mitigation PartyReporting ActionCriteriaMeasure (MM) Initials

MM 810-1: Marine Prior to Mammal and Sea

OGPP permit No adverse Document contact All State waters; prior to commencement of survey survey.holder; effects to with appropriate operations, the geophysical operator shall : (1) contact 1'2. / c;,. /11

Inquiry to Current

marine sources. the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Turtle Presence -NOAA and mammals orLong Beach office staff and local whale-watching 0tL--

Submit Final local whale composition and relative abundance of marine wildlife operations and shall acquire information on the current sea turtles due Information.

Monitoring Report watching offshore, and (2) convey sightings data to the vessel

to survey operators.

operator and crew, survey party chief, and onboard activities are after completion of observed. survey activities.

Marine Wildlife Monitors (MWMs) pnor to departure. This ~1~1,~ information will aid the MWMs by providing data on the approximate number and types of organisms that may be in the area.

MM 810-2: Marine Document contact OGPP permit Prior to Wildlife Monitors

CompetentExcept as provided In section 7(h) of the General Permit, holder. survey.

(MWMs). with and approval by anda minimum of two (2) qualified MW Ms who are

professional appropriate onboard tho survey vessel th1oughout both transit and experienced 111 maI111e w1ldhfo observations shall be \1/-1jr7monitoring or agencies.

marine observa tion, ond cfoto collection rospons1b1l1t1cs shall be data collection octIvItIes Tho spoc1f1c monitoring,

Submit Final mammals and ) /e>/i-oMonitoring Report

as pa1t of oll Offsho10 Goophys1cal Permit Program 1dent1f1od 111 tho Mn11110 W1ldllfe Contingency Plan required sea turtles;

after completion of permits OL1nhfIcnt1ono ol pronoscd MWMs shall be

compliance with survey activities. ,6i-established

AdmI111str ot1on (NOAA) ond CSI C at least twenty-one submfltod to tho NutI011ol Ocoa111c and Atmospheric

monitoring (? 1) doys In ,1dv,rnco of tho swvcy for their approval by policies. tho ogoncIou S,11voy operations shall not commence until tho CSt C npprovos the MWMs.

MM 810-3: Safety OGPP permit Prior to Zone Monitoring.

No adverse Compliance with Onboord Manne Wildlife Monitors (MWMs) responsible survey.

fo1 monitoring during the survey equipment operations. A ll marine permit requirements holder. effects to 101 observa tions during vessel transit shall be responsible (observers); \2./Pi(11compliance with

vantage point aboard the survey vessel; binoculars shall mammals orvisual monitoring shall occur from the highest practical

established safety be used to observe the surrounding area, as appropriate.

sea turtles due zones. to survey >/"(, e

activities are zone) based on the equipment used, centered on the The MWMs will survey an area (i .e., safety or exclusion

Submit Final observed; &-,L,.compliance Monitoring Report

the survey equipment is operating. Safety zone radial sound source (i.e., vessel, towfish) , throughout time that

with after completion of distances, by equipment type, include: established survey activities.

safety zones.

Updated: 04/23/2014



Location and Scope of Mitigation Effectiveness Criteria

Monitoring or Reporting Action

Responsible Party

Timing Implementation

Date(s) and Initials

Safety Zone Equipment Type (radius, ml

Sinqle Beam Echosounder 50 Multibeam Echosounder 500 Side-Scan Sonar 600-Subbottom Prol1ler 100

l!QQ_mer System 100

If the geophysical survey equipment is operated at or above a frequency of 200 kilohertz (kHz), safety zone monitoring and enforcement 1s not required; however, if geophySICfl l survey eq11ipment operated at a frequency at or above 200 kl 1, Is used s11nultaneoL1sly with \1-/'1 j,; geophysica l survey equipment less than 200 kHz, then t110 safety zone for the equipment less than 200 kHz must bo monitored. 1 he onboard MW Ms shall have authority to stop operations 1f a mammal or turtle is observed within the specified safety zone and may be negatively affected by survoy actIv11Ios. The MWMs shall also have authority to rocommonct cont1nuallon (or cessation) of operations during poliocts of lim1tod v1sib11ily (1.e , fog, rain) based on tho obsorvod obundonco of marine wildlife. Periodic reevaluollon of woolher cond11ions and reassessment of the cont1nuotlon/cossot1on recommendation shall be completed by tho onboard MWMs, During operations, if an animal's actions are observed to be irregular, the monitor shall have authority to recommend that equipment be shut down until the animal moves fu rther away from the sound source. If 1rregL1lar behavior is observed, the equipment shall be shut-off and will be restarted and ramped-up to fu ll power, as applicable, or will not be started until the animal(s) is/are outside of the safety zone or have not been observed for 15 minutes.

For nearshore survey operations utilizing vessels that lack the personnel capacity to hold two (2) MWMs aboard during survey operations, at least twenty-one (21) days prior to the commencement of survey activities, the Permittee may petition the CSLC to conduct survey operations with one (1 ) MWM aboard. The CSLC will consider such authorization on a case-by-case basis and

~

Updated: 04/23/2014



Location and Scope of Mitigation Effectiveness



Party Timing


Initials factors the CSLC will consider will include the timing, type, and location of the survey, the size of the vessel, and the availability of alternate vessels for conducting the proposed survey. CSLC authoriza tions under this subsection will be limited to individual surveys and under any such authorization; the Perm1ttee shall update the MWCP to reflect how survey operations will occur under the authorization. All State waters; nighttime survey operations are prohibited under the OGPP, except as provided below. The CSLC will consider the use of single beam echosounders and passive equipment types at night on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration the equipment specifications, location, timing, and duration of survey activity.

All State waters; the survey opera tor shall use a "soft start" technique at the beginning of survey activities each day (or following a shut down) to allow any marine mammal that may be in the immediate area to leave before the sound sources reach full energy. Surveys shall not commence at n1ght11me or when the safety zone cannot be effectively monitored. Operators shall ini tiate each piece of equipment at the lowest practical sound level, increasing output in such a manner as to increase in steps not exceeding approximately 6 decibels (dB) per 5-minute period. During ramp-up, the Marine Wildlife Monitors (MWMs) shall monitor the safety zone. If marine mammals are sighted within or about to enter the safety zone, a power-down or shut down shall be implemented as though the equipment was operating at full power. Initiation of ramp-up procedures from shut down requires that the MWMs be able to visua lly observe the full safety zone.

MM 810-4: Limits on Nighttime OGPP Surveys.

No adverse effects to marine mammals or sea turtles due to survey activities are observed.

Presurvey request fo r nighttime operations, including equipment specifica tions and proposed use schedule.

Document equipment use.

Submit Final Monitoring Report after completion of survev activities.

OGPP permit holder.

Approval required before survey is initiated.

Monitoring Report following comple-tion of survey.

(2/'1 ;,-,

DA-y4 '-"Ht

e-..ri-y

~

MM 8 10 -5: Soft Start.

No adverse effects to marine mammals or sea turtles due to survey activities are observed.

Compliance with permit requirements (observers); compliance with safe start procedures.

Submit Final Monitoring Report after completion of survey activities.

OGPP permit holder.

Imme-diately prior to survey.

ti(~ (,-1 ~

Updated: 04/23/2014


ImplementationEffectiveness Monitoring or ResponsibleMitigation Timing Date(s) and Location and Scope of Mitigation PartyCriteria Reporting Action Measure (MM) Initials

MM B10-6: No adverse Document initial and OGPP permit Imme-Practical

All State waters; geophysical operators shall follow, to the during survey diately

Limitations on maximum extent possible, the guidelines of Zykov (201 3) effects to holder.

marine equipment settings. prior to Equipment Use

as they pertain to the use of subbottom profilers and side-mammals or and during

and Adherence to scan sonar, including:

sea turtles due Submit Final survey . • Using the highest frequency band possible for the I2./ -. j, '7 to survey Monitoring Report

Manufacturer's Equipment subbottom profiler;

activities are after completion of• Using the shortest possible pulse length; and e,..,p_ observed. survey activities.

Maintenance Routine • Lowering the pulse rate (pings per second) as much

as feasible. Schedule. Geophysical operators shall consider the potential

applicability of these measures to other equipment types (e.g., boomer). Permit holders wi ll conduct rou line inspection and maintenance of acoustic-generating equipment to ensure that low energy geophysical equipment used during permi tted survey act1v1ties remains in proper working order and within manufacturer's eqLIIpment spec1f1ca t1ons. Venf1ca t1on of the date and occurrence of such equipment inspection and maintenance shall be provided in the required presurvey notification to CSI C.

MM B1O-7: No adverse Document pinniped OGPP permit Monitoring Avoidance of

The Manne Wildlife Conlingoncy Plan (MWCP) developed effects to reactions to vessel holder. Report

Pinniped Haul-OL1I and 1mplomentocl tor ooch survey shall include

pinnipeds at presence and following Sites.

1dcnt1ficHl1on of linul-out silos w1tl11n or immediately equipment use. comple-

300 motors (111) of fl haul out site. the MWCP shall further haul outs areadJaccnt to tho p1oposod survey area. For surveys within

tion of require that

observed. Submit Final survey. l2-/~(t1 Monitoring Report

a haul-out site. consistent w1 lh National Marine . 1 ho suIvoy vessel shall not approach within 91 m of

after completion of ~ survey activities. . Survey act1v1ty close lo haul-out sites shall be

conducted in an expedited manner to minimize the

Fisheries Service (NMFS) guidelines;

1/z,f G potential for disturbance of pinnipeds on land ; and . Marine Wildli fe Monitors shall monitor pinniped @l_activity onshore as the vessel approaches, observing and reporting on the number of pinnipeds potentially disturbed (e.g., via head lifting , flushing into the water). The purpose of such reporting is to provide CSLC and California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) with information regarding potential disturbance associated with OGPP surveys.

Updated: 04/23/2014



Locatio n and Scope of Mitigation Effect iveness

Criteria Monito ring or

Repo rting Action Responsible

Party Timing


Initials

MM 810-8: A ll State waters ; if a co llision with marine mammal or No adverse Submit Final OGPP permit Monitoring

Reporting reptile occurs, the vessel operator shall document the effects to Monitoring Report holder. Report

Requirements - cond1t1ons under which the accident occurred, including marine after completion of fo llowing Coll ision. the following mammals or survey activities. comple-. Vessel location (latitude, longitude) when the collision sea turtles due

occu, red , to survey l ion of survey. ~ . Dato and time of colhs,on, . Spoud ond hoadIng o f the vessel at the time of

activities are observed. ; . 'f>. (t>

collls1on, . OIJoo,vnllon cond 1tlonR (o g, wind speed and dIroctlo11, i;woll ho11Jhl, vIs1b1hly in miles o r kilometers. £111(1 p,ononco o l 1nIn or fof)) fl t tho time of co llision, . Spuclm1 u l n1(11 I11u w1ldlilo contacted (1I known), . Wl10ll1rn 1111 olmu,vo, wr1s monItonng marine wi ldlife nt tho 111110 o l coll1r1lon, nnd, . Nnmu of vunnol, vmrnul owner/operator, and captain o lllc<J1 111 c:1111100 011110 vosscl at time of collis ion.

Alto , a coll1uI011, IIH, vust1ul shall s top, 1f sa fe lo do so: howuvo,, tho v1Hl'1til tu 1101 01.Jl,gotod to stand by and may p, occocl t1II01 co11f11ml11f1 llw t It will not further damage the nnlmnl lly <101110 ·10 I ho v<w:10I will then 11nmed1ate ly C0111111l1111(;{110 lly 111(110 01 lolophono all details to the voooul'•11)11·10 o t c.1pw r1l1011:1, 1111ct s110II1mmcd1atety report tho I11c1clo11I Co11•1In10111 wlll1 M1111110 Mammal Protection /\cl 1oquh u11 1unt·1, 1110 voMol's bosc of oporatIo ns or, if an onbonrci lo lophon(} lfl ovrnloblo, tho vessel captain h11n/ho1 null , w 1i1 lhun 1111111od101oty cnll the Nallonal OcoonIc oncl l\ln1onphe11c l\dm1111stration (NOAA) S11ond1ng Coo1tl111n1or to ,opo1t the co ll1s1on and follow any subsoq11('n l Instr11c t1ons I rom the report, the Stranding Coo1tfinuto, will coordinate subsequent action, 1nclud1ng ont1s t1ng the aid o f marine mammal rescue organiza l1ons, 1f appropriate From the vessel's base of operations, a telephone call will be placed to the Stranding Coordinator, NOAA National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), Southwest Region, Long Beach, to obtain instructions. Although NOAA has primary responsibi lity for marine mammals in both State and Federal waters, the California Departme nt of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) will also be advised that an inc ident has occurred in State waters affectinq a orotected soecies.

Updated: 04/23/2014



Location and Scope of Mitigat ion Effectiveness

Criteria Monito ring or


Party Timing


Initials MM 810-9: All MPAs; prior to commencing survey activities, No adverse Monitor reactions of OGPP permit Prior to Limitations on geophysical operators shall coordinate with the CLSC, effects to MPA wildlife to survey holder; survey. Survey Operations in Select Marine Protected Areas (MPAs).

California Department of Fish and Wildlife (C DFW), and any other appropriate permitting agency regarding proposed operations within MPAs. The scope and purpose of each survey proposed within a MPA shall be

resources due to survey activities are observed.

operations; report on shutdown conditions and survey restart.

survey permitted by CDFW. 12./ c, /r,

defined by the permit holder, and the applicability of the survey to the allowable MPA activities shall be delineated

Submit Final Monitoring Report G-rL-

by the permit holder. If deemed necessary by CDFW, after completion of geophysical operators will pursue a scientific collecting survey activities. permit, or other appropriate authorization, to secure approval to work within a MPA, and shall provide a copy of such authorization to the CSLC as part of the required presurvey notification to CSLC. CSLC, CDFW, and/or other permitting agencies may impose further restrictions on survev activities as conditions of annroval.

MM HAZ-1: Oil Spill Contingency Plan (OSCP) Required

Permittees shall develop and submit to CSLC staff for review and approval an OSCP that addresses accidental releases of petroleum and/or non-petroleum products during survey operations. Permittees' OSCPs shall

Reduction in the potential for an accidental

Documentation of proper spill training.

Notification of

OGPP permit holder and contract vessel

Prior to survey. 11/1/11

Information. include the following information for each vessel to be involved with the survey:

spill . Proper and timely

responsible parties in the event of a spill.

operator. €;{l-" • Specific steps to be taken in the event of a spill, response and

including notification names, phone numbers, and notification of locations of (1) nearby emergency medical faci lities, responsible and (2) wildli fe rescue/response organizations (e.g. , parties in the Oiled Wildlife Care Network); event of a

• Description of crew training and equipment testing spill. procedures; and

• Description , quantities, and location of spill response eauioment onboard the vessel.

MM HAZ-2: Vessel fueling

Vessel fueling shall only occur at an approved docking facility. No cross vessel fueling shall be allowed.

Reduction in the potential

Documentation of fueling activities.

Contract vessel

Following survey.

t,JO rVt"I c;,,V"""

12-/"t(,, restrictions. for an operator.

accidental soill.

(:,)'l--

MM HAZ-3: OSCP equipment and supplies.

Onboard spill response equipment and supplies shall be sufficient to contain and recover the worst-case scenario spill of petroleum products as outlined in the OSCP.

Proper and timely response in

Notification to CSLC of onboard spill response

Contract vessel operator.

Prior to survey. li-/flt fr7

the event of a equipment/supplies ~ soil!. inventorv, verifv

oP5)

Updated: 04/23/2014

1



Location and Scope of Mitigation Effect iveness



Party Timing


Initials ability to respond to worst-case soill.

MM HAZ-1 : Oil Spill Contingency Plan (OSCP) Required Information. MM HAZ-2: Vessel fue ling restrictions. MM HAZ-3. OSCP equipment and supplies. MM B10-9: Limitations on Survey Operations in Select MPAs. MM REC-1: U.S. Coast Guard (USCG), Harbormaster, and Dive Shop Operator Notification.

Outlined under Hazards and Hazardous Materials (above)

OutlInod undor Hazards and Hazardous Materials (above)

Out1Inod under Hazards and Hazardous Materials (above)

Out11no(t u11clt,1Rlologlcnl Resources (above)

All C{llllo111Ir1wnlorn whc,1c, rocrc atronal diving may occur; No adverse as n survoy po,111II co11dllro11, tho CSLC shall require effects to Per111I1loos to provr(lu lllo USCG with survey details, recreational 1ncluclinu lr1lorlllnlI011 0 11 vun,uJI typos. sLrrvoy locations, divers from limus, co11tnct ir1lo1111ntio11, n11d other dotarls of activities survey thot mny pm10 n llrr.rnid lo d1vors so tllat USCG can operations. tncludo lllo Inlo111111lIci11 11 tile I ocirl Notice to Manners, t1dvlsInu Vllllilelh1to r,vold potc.-111I0I h;:i7ards near survey mens I urlhfll lll0ro , 111loon! twenty-one (21) days in odvonco o l In w, ,tur nc1IvI1I0s . f'lorm1ttees shall: (1) post such notlcmi 1111110 hnr borr nastors' o ffrces of regional ho1bors, t1ml (?) 11olrly opora10Is of drve shops in coastal locotI0 11s ncl1nct:111 to the proposed offshore survey oporotlons

Notify the USCG, local harbormasters, and local dive shops of planned survey activity.

Submit Final Monitoring Report after completion of survey activities.

OGPP permit holder.

Prior to survey. (~/10/17

e-fV

Updated: 04/23/2014

1


ImplementationMonitoring or ResponsibleEffectivenessMitigation Timing Date(s) andLocation and Scope of Mitigation

Criteria Reporting Action PartyMeasure (MM) Initials MM FISH-1 U.S. Prior to Coast Guard

Notify the USCG and OGPP permitAll California waters; as a survey permit condition, the No adverse holder. survey.CSLC shall require Permittees to provide the USCG with effects to local harbormasters !0 /10/1,

of planned survey Harbormaste r

commercial(USCG) and survey details, including info rmation on vessel types, fish ing gear in activity.survey locations, times, contact information, and other ~ place.

and fishers so that USCG can include the information in Notification. details of activities that may pose a hazard to marine rs

Submit Final the I oc1;1l Notice to Manners, advising vessels to avoid Monitoring Report potenllal ha1ards near survey areas. Furthermore, at after completion of least twenty-one (21) days 11 advance of in-water survey activities. act1v1t10s, Pe1m1ttccs shall post such notices in the harborma~tc1s· offices of ro91onal harbors.

MM FISH-2: Imme-Minimize

No adverse Visually observe the OGPP permitTo 1111n1m11c 1nto1nct1011 with l1sh1ng gear that may be survey area fo r holder. diatelyeffects topresent within o s11,vcy (l!Ca (1) the geophysical vessel \1/ctj,,

prior to Fishing Gear.

commercial commercial fishingInteraction with (or dos19nntr d vPssol) sholl lravc rse the proposed survey surveygear. Notify the gearconidor p1101 to coinmunc1ng survey operations to note fishing gear in l-Z./1s/17 (prio r to

fishing 00111 {I o . lrnoys), (?) no survey lines within 30 m and roco1ct 1110 p1 oflcnco, type, and location of deployed place. owner and request

relocation of gear each bt2-outside survey area. survey The survey c.rcw shrill not romove or relocate any fishing (100 roo t) ol ohtw1vcd l1st11ng gear shall be conducted.

day). gear, 1emov(I I 01 1olocnt10 ,1 sholl only be accomplished by Submit Final the owner or tho qPnr lJpon not1f1ca t1on by the survey Monitoring Report ope1otor ol tho potont1ul conll1c t. after completion of

survev activities. MM FISH-1 : OL1t l111ocl unct1•1Commorc lol and Recrea tio nal Fisheries USCG and (above) Harbormaster Notification.

Acronyms/Abbrev1at1ons C/\HO C,illlo1111a Ai r Resources Board; CDFW = California Department of Fish and Wildlife; CSLC = California State Lands Commission; dB = dcc1bols. kl ,,. kllol1c r11, MPA = Marine Protected A rea; MWCP = Marine W ildlife Contingency Plan; MWM = Marine W ildlife Monitor; m= meter(s) ; NOAA = National Ocoon1c and Atmospheric Administration; NO, = Nitrogen Oxide; OGPP = Offshore Geophysical Permit Program; OSCP = Oil Spill Contingency Plan, USCG ~ U S Coast Guard

Updated: 04/23/2014

post survey report - california

Documents