posc 2200 – international political economy
DESCRIPTION
POSC 2200 – International Political Economy. Russell Alan Williams Department of Political Science. Unit Six: International Political Economy. "Finance" Required Reading: Globalization of World Politics , Chapters 15 and 27. Outline: Introduction - Finance and Investment - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: POSC 2200 – International Political Economy](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022102801/568168bd550346895ddfafee/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
POSC 2200 – International Political Economy
Russell Alan WilliamsDepartment of Political Science
![Page 2: POSC 2200 – International Political Economy](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022102801/568168bd550346895ddfafee/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Unit Six: International Political Economy "Finance"
Required Reading: Globalization of World Politics, Chapters 15
and 27.
Outline: 1. Introduction - Finance and Investment2. Key Mechanisms3. Institutions4. Multinational Corporations
![Page 3: POSC 2200 – International Political Economy](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022102801/568168bd550346895ddfafee/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
1) Introduction - Finance and Investment:System of finance and currency exchange vital
Without it there would be: No Trade No Travel No Development
Challenges:i) National currencies versus international markets
Must be confidence in the system of exchange Need a management system that ensures:
Convertibility Liquidity Stability
![Page 4: POSC 2200 – International Political Economy](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022102801/568168bd550346895ddfafee/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Historically: “Gold Standard” ensured this . . . Money could always be converted into precious
metal – kept currencies stable Modern money is abstract – value driven by
perception International Challenge: Make global financial
markets secure and stable (!)
ii) Globalization of finance Makes possible emergence of MNC’s Reduces state control over currency and
investment Increases need for cooperation to ensure
financial stability
![Page 5: POSC 2200 – International Political Economy](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022102801/568168bd550346895ddfafee/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
2) Key Mechanisms:a) “Currency Markets”: Private markets where
foreign exchange occurs (where currencies are “traded”)
E.g. the “exchange rate”: Rate at which one currency can be exchanged for another E.g. $100.00 (CDN) =$95.76 USD
=$61.79 USD (Jan 2002)
$100.00 (CDN) = e71.18 Euro
Why do currencies go up and down in value?
![Page 6: POSC 2200 – International Political Economy](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022102801/568168bd550346895ddfafee/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
State choice E.g. Competitive devaluations that led to the “Great Depression”
Domestic economic policy E.g. Lowering interest rates to stimulate economy
can reduce value of a currency
Market “supply and demand” Large “Balance of Trade” deficit can result in
reduced value of currency
![Page 7: POSC 2200 – International Political Economy](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022102801/568168bd550346895ddfafee/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Currency speculation Currency traders benefit from market
fluctuations = instability is “good” – for them! Small currency are exposed to speculative
fluctuations
Real economic performance E.g. China (?) – Trade surpluses can increase
value of currencies E.g. EU – economic crisis can drive currency
down
Strength of the currency E.g. Perceived reliability of US $
![Page 8: POSC 2200 – International Political Economy](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022102801/568168bd550346895ddfafee/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Key Points:
“Currency Markets” have grown(!)
Markets subject states to “discipline” in economic policy . . . this is “new”. E.g. “Bretton Woods”: System of financial management
established after WWII protected states from market fluctuations – ended in 1970s.
=“Capital Controls”: Formal restrictions on the right to exchange money
Main foreign exchange market turnover, 1988 – 2007, measured in billions of USD.
![Page 9: POSC 2200 – International Political Economy](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022102801/568168bd550346895ddfafee/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
b) “Balance of Payments”: Flow of money into and out of a country from trade, tourism, investment and borrowing Two main components:
Current Account = “Balance of Trade”
Capital Account – Measures investment and borrowing flows = $$
$
![Page 10: POSC 2200 – International Political Economy](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022102801/568168bd550346895ddfafee/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Balance of Payments (2001) In Billions USDUnited States Germany
Current AccountBalance of Trade Exports Imports
998-1,356
658-620
Gov Transactions & Investment income
-35 -35
Current Account Balance -393 3Capital Account Net Investment and
lending flows in (+) and out (-) of country
398 -8
ReservesChanges in Official
Reserves5 -5
![Page 11: POSC 2200 – International Political Economy](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022102801/568168bd550346895ddfafee/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
“Balance of Payments” cont . . . Key points:
1) Should balance every year
2) States with “balance of trade” deficits must be capital importers
E.g. Foreign Investment
Consumer borrowing
Government borrowing from foreign sources
![Page 12: POSC 2200 – International Political Economy](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022102801/568168bd550346895ddfafee/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
“Balance of Payments” cont . . . Different from government finances
Government’s Annual Budget:
Has surpluses and deficits depending on tax revenue relative to spending . . . .
National Debt: Money owed by governments because of past deficits
Can effect “balance of payments” - but only if deficits and debts are borrowed from foreign sources
![Page 13: POSC 2200 – International Political Economy](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022102801/568168bd550346895ddfafee/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Current financial positions: Attention to “balance of payments” can change
image of power in IR
Canada: National Debt: Less than single year of GDP
Large Annual Deficits . . . Early 1980s to late 1990s
“Balance of Trade”: Small trade surplus Surplus with US Deficit with rest of world
Balance of Payments:
Canada a net capital exporter – Canadian outward investment
![Page 14: POSC 2200 – International Political Economy](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022102801/568168bd550346895ddfafee/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
United States: National Debt: Over $17 Trillion(!)
More than a single year of GDP Large Annual Deficits
High in early 1980s and early 21st Century “Balance of Trade”: Large trade deficits for
decades
“Balance of Payments”: Requires capital imports Unsustainable over long term??
Implications? Risk of US decline . . . . Canada? Damage to international financial system?
![Page 15: POSC 2200 – International Political Economy](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022102801/568168bd550346895ddfafee/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
China:
National Debt: None
“Balance of Trade”: Large trade surplus Surplus with developed countries Deficit with rest of world
“Balance of Payments”: China also a net capital importer (???) Results in huge increases in currency
reserves More then $1 Trillion (USD) China has “Capital Controls”
Implications?
![Page 16: POSC 2200 – International Political Economy](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022102801/568168bd550346895ddfafee/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
“Unbalanced” Global Economy (2000-????)
Americans buy too much, make little Pay for it through creative debt – house finances = !!!!
Chinese export too much – currency does not go up in value = !!!!
What to do with those extra USD $$$$? =Lend them to Americans!
Implications?
![Page 17: POSC 2200 – International Political Economy](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022102801/568168bd550346895ddfafee/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
3) Institutions: Financial instability - exchange rate
fluctuations/balance of payments problems – need to be managed! Bad for trade
Bad for MNC’s
Bad for states and development
Requires institutions to coordinate behavior and manage financial system
![Page 18: POSC 2200 – International Political Economy](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022102801/568168bd550346895ddfafee/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Domestic Institutions - Central Banks: Control monetary policy
Influence interest rates
Control exchange rate policy Control currency reserves and interest
rates
Normally “independent” of political control – role is to coordinate policy with other countries to achieve stabilityE.g. Bank of Canada and U.S. Interest
Rates
![Page 19: POSC 2200 – International Political Economy](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022102801/568168bd550346895ddfafee/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
International Institutions:
“International Monetary Fund (IMF)”: Established after WWII to manage temporary
balance of payments problems Reduces exchange rate volatility
Current role – longer term loans to countries facing “debt crisis” – Requires “conditionalities”
Supports “Liberalization” and “Deregulation”
Run by “weighted voting”
Plays favorites? = Harsh treatment of LDC’s in debt
![Page 20: POSC 2200 – International Political Economy](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022102801/568168bd550346895ddfafee/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
“World Bank”: Established after WWII to make long term
loans to support development
E.g. Reduce capital account deficits of developing countries
Causes . . . .
Also run by weighted voting Loans lower cost than private lending
However resources insufficient
Developing countries borrow from other sources = high interest and debt problems
![Page 21: POSC 2200 – International Political Economy](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022102801/568168bd550346895ddfafee/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Both IMF and World Bank subject to heavy criticism E.g. 1)Management of the LDC “debt
crisis”
2) Support for economic liberalism and “Deregulation” – which has made some problems worse . . . .
Marxists, “antiglobalizers” and others point to failures of these institutions
![Page 22: POSC 2200 – International Political Economy](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022102801/568168bd550346895ddfafee/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
4) Multinational Corporations “Multinational Corporations (MNCs)”:
Private enterprises with production, facilities, sales operations and investments in several states Implies control over operations of
“subsidiaries” in other countries
“Home” and “host” countries???
Can only exist with globalized finance – “currency markets” and no “capital controls” blocking foreign investment
![Page 23: POSC 2200 – International Political Economy](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022102801/568168bd550346895ddfafee/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Example: General Electric “Based” in US
250 factories in 26 countries Subsidiaries?
Products? Consumer electronics, financial services, weapons
(tanks, jets and ships), nuclear reactors, WMD’s, and NBC
$575,244,000,000 in global assets 1/2 outside the US 315,000 employees outside US
![Page 24: POSC 2200 – International Political Economy](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022102801/568168bd550346895ddfafee/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Impact of MNC’s? Home Countries?
Bring in global profits “Good” jobs
Host Countries? Hosts compete to attract MNC investment
“Race to the Bottom” – states reduce taxes, environmental standards etc. to attract companies
Bad jobs, pollution and profits go elsewhere
Power: MNC’s have ability to influence what host states do . . .
![Page 25: POSC 2200 – International Political Economy](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022102801/568168bd550346895ddfafee/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Obstacles to growth of MNC’s
1) Nationalization by foreign governments E.g. Cuba, Venezuela & Newfoundland
2) Exchange rate fluctuations and instability
Increases cost of doing business
![Page 26: POSC 2200 – International Political Economy](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022102801/568168bd550346895ddfafee/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
5) For Next Time . . . Unit Six: International Political Economy
“Environmental Cooperation”
Required Reading: Globalization of World Politics, Chapter 21. David Layfield, “International policy on climate change:
after Kyoto, what next?” Environmental Politics, 19:4, (2010), Pp. 657-661. (Available from e-journals, or from the instructor.)