pore-to-field upscaling of immiscible two-phase flow hasan nooruddin martin blunt jan 2015

11
Pore-to-Field Upscaling of Immiscible Two-Phase Flow Hasan Nooruddin Martin Blunt Jan 2015

Upload: salvatore-sunderland

Post on 16-Dec-2015

219 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Pore-to-Field Upscaling of Immiscible Two-Phase Flow Hasan Nooruddin Martin Blunt Jan 2015

Pore-to-Field Upscaling of Immiscible Two-Phase Flow

Hasan Nooruddin Martin BluntJan 2015

Page 2: Pore-to-Field Upscaling of Immiscible Two-Phase Flow Hasan Nooruddin Martin Blunt Jan 2015

Outline

• What is upscaling?• Why to scale-up multiphase flow properties? • Upscaling methods – brief background• How are we going to upscale multiphase flow?

Page 3: Pore-to-Field Upscaling of Immiscible Two-Phase Flow Hasan Nooruddin Martin Blunt Jan 2015

What is upscaling?

• Upscaling is a process to determine effective multiphase flow properties on larger scales while capturing small-scale heterogeneity.

(Rhodes et al. 2008)

Page 4: Pore-to-Field Upscaling of Immiscible Two-Phase Flow Hasan Nooruddin Martin Blunt Jan 2015

Introduction

Relative Permeability Capillary Pressure

• Field-scale reservoir simulation study always suffer from a shortage of SCAL data.• Pore-network modelling provides a practical tool to generate large datasets of physically-consistent

multiphase flow properties relatively quickly.• We need to scale-up this information to a field-scale reservoir simulation gridblock.

• to include other heterogeneities found at larger scales.• to address the impact of fluid forces acting at larger scales (e.g., impact of global boundary

conditions)

Page 5: Pore-to-Field Upscaling of Immiscible Two-Phase Flow Hasan Nooruddin Martin Blunt Jan 2015

Why do we need to upscale pore-scale multiphase flow ?

• If it is not the REV:• We need to include other heterogeneities at larger scales.

• Assuming REV:• We need to address the impact of fluid forces acting at larger scales (e.g., impact of global

boundary conditions)

Page 6: Pore-to-Field Upscaling of Immiscible Two-Phase Flow Hasan Nooruddin Martin Blunt Jan 2015

Upscaling approaches

• Steady-state • Unsteady-state (Dynamic methods)

Page 7: Pore-to-Field Upscaling of Immiscible Two-Phase Flow Hasan Nooruddin Martin Blunt Jan 2015

Steady-state method

• Computationally cheaper than dynamic methods

• Key issue is to find the saturation distribution• CL: constant capillary pressure • VL: constant fractional flow• CL+VL: simulate until steady-state is reached – similar to dynamic method

• Apply sequence of single-phase simulations• Repeat the process at different average

saturations

Page 8: Pore-to-Field Upscaling of Immiscible Two-Phase Flow Hasan Nooruddin Martin Blunt Jan 2015

Unsteady-state method

• Require running the fine-gridded model – Computationally demanding

• Account for numerical dispersion• Case dependent – have to be reproduced for

different flood rates and directions.• Might generate unphysical relative

permeability curves (non-monotone flux)

Page 9: Pore-to-Field Upscaling of Immiscible Two-Phase Flow Hasan Nooruddin Martin Blunt Jan 2015

Our approach

mm scale

cm scale

m scale

Facies-model scale

• Multistage approach starting from an accurate representation at the pore level.• Pore-network model:

• capillary-controlled displacement – valid for most conditions at pore level.• good starting point – does not depend on BC.

• Incorporate pore-, core-, intermediate-, and large-scale heterogeneities, as required.• Including the right balance of forces at each stage.• Represent physics and geology.

Page 10: Pore-to-Field Upscaling of Immiscible Two-Phase Flow Hasan Nooruddin Martin Blunt Jan 2015

Thank You

Thank you

Page 11: Pore-to-Field Upscaling of Immiscible Two-Phase Flow Hasan Nooruddin Martin Blunt Jan 2015

Our approach

• We need to develop a simulator: • Incompressible , two-phase flow

simulator • Includes viscous, capillary and

gravitational forces• Unstructured – to effectively capture

heterogeneities at all upscaling stages

(Rhodes et al. 2008)