population and housing unit counts - census.gov · 2012-06-26 · population and housing unit...

North Dakota: 2010Population and Housing Unit Counts

2010 Census of Population and Housing

Issued June 2012CPH-2-36

U.S. Department of CommerceEconomics and Statistics Administration

U.S. CENSUS BUREAU

census.gov

U.S. Department of Commerce Rebecca M. Blank,

Acting Secretary

Rebecca M. Blank, Deputy Secretary

Economics and Statistics Administration Vacant,

Under Secretary for Economic Affairs

U.S. CENSUS BUREAU Robert M. Groves,

Director

North Dakota: 2010Population and Housing Unit Counts

Issued June 2012

CPH-2-36

ECONOMICS

AND STATISTICS

ADMINISTRATION

SUGGESTED CITATION

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census of

Population and Housing, Population and

Housing Unit Counts,CPH-2-36, North Dakota

U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC,

2012

Economics and Statistics Administration

Vacant, Under Secretary for Economic Affairs

U.S. CENSUS BUREAU

Robert M. Groves, Director

Thomas L. Mesenbourg, Deputy Director and Chief Operating Officer

Nancy A. Potok, Associate Director for Demographic Programs

Enrique J. Lamas, Chief, Population Division

Contents iii

List of Statistical Tables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . v How to Use This Census Report . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I-1 Table Finding Guide . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . II-1 User Notes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . III-1 Crosswalk of Urban Areas and Places: 2010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . IV-1 Statistical Tables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1

Appendixes

A Geographic Terms and Concepts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . *B Definitions of Subject Characteristics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . *C Data Collection and Processing Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . *D Questionnaire . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . *E Maps . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . E-1F Operational Overview and Accuracy of the Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . *G Residence Rule and Residence Situations for the 2010 Census of the United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . *H Acknowledgments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . *

*Appendix may be found in the separate volume, CPH-2-A, Population and Housing Unit Counts, Selected Appendixes, in print and on the Internet at <www .census .gov /prod/cen2010/cph-2-a .pdf> .

CONTENTS

List of Statistical Tables v

Table no. Title Page

1. Population: Earliest Census to 2010; and Housing Units: 1950 to 2010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 State, Urban and Rural

2. Population, Housing Units, and Land Area by Urban and Rural and Size of Urban Area: 2010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 State, Urban and Rural, Size of Urban Area [Population]

3. Population by Urban and Rural and Size of Place: 2010 . . . 4 State, Size of Place [Population]

4. Population and Housing Units: 1970 to 2010 . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 State, County/County Equivalent

5. Population, Housing Units, Land Area, and Density: 2010; and Percent Change: 1980 to 2010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 State, County/County Equivalent

6. Rank of Counties by Percent Change in Population: 2000 to 2010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 County/County Equivalent

7. Population by Urban and Rural: 2010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 State, County/County Equivalent

8. Population and Housing Units: 1990 to 2010; and Area Measurements and Density: 2010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 State, County/County Equivalent, County Subdivision, Place

9. Population and Housing Units: 1990 to 2010; and Area Measurements and Density: 2010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 State, Place and [in Selected States] County Subdivision

10. Rank by 2010 Population and Housing Units: 2000 and 2010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52 Place [2,500 or More Population]

11. Rank of Places by Percent Change in Population: 2000 to 2010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53 Place [2,500 or More Population]

12. Population and Housing Units for Urban Areas: 2010 . . . . . 54 State, Urbanized Area, Urban Cluster

LIST Of STATISTICAL

TAbLES

How to Use This Census Report I-1U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

How to Use This Census Report

CONTENTS

Page

Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I-1

How to Find Geographic Areas and Subject Matter Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I-2

How to Use the Statistical Tables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I-2

Graphics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I-5

User Notes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I-5

Appendixes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I-5

INTRODUCTION

Data from the 2010 Census for the United States and Puerto Rico are presented in two printed report series and a single report for American Indians and Alaska Natives by tribe:

1. CPH-1, Summary Population and Housing Characteristics

2. CPH-2, Population and Housing Unit Counts

3. CPH-3, Characteristics of American Indians and Alaska Natives by Tribe

The data from the 2010 Census were derived from a limited number of basic questions asked of the entire population and about every housing unit. Appendix D (see Selected Appendixes report at <www.census .gov/prod/cen2010/cph-2-a.pdf>) presents a facsimile of the questionnaire pages used to collect the data included in this report. Note that the “long form” data included in previous censuses are not included in the 2010 Census.

The CPH-1, Summary Population and Housing Characteristics, report series provides data based on age, Hispanic or Latino origin, household relationship, race, sex, tenure (owner- or renter-occupied), and vacancy characteristics. Land area measurements and population density also are provided. This series is similar to the Census 2000 PHC-1 series.

The CPH-2, Population and Housing Unit Counts, report series provides 2010 Census and historical com-parisons of the population and housing unit counts. It also provides area measurements and density. The user notes section documents geographic changes over the past decade. This series is similar to the Census 2000 PHC-3 series.

In each series, there is one report for each state, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico, plus a United States summary report. Many tables in the United States summary reports include data for Puerto Rico.

The CPH-3, Characteristics of American Indians and Alaska Natives by Tribe, report provides population and housing information for selected American Indian and Alaska Native tribes. This report is similar to the Census 2000 PHC-5 report. This is a single report covering the entire United States.

I-2 How to Use This Census ReportU.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

HOW TO FIND GEOGRAPHIC AREAS AND SUBJECT MATTER DATA

This report includes a table finding guide to assist the user in locating those statistical tables that contain the desired data. The table finding guide lists alphabetically, by geographic area, the subjects shown in this report. To determine which tables in this report show data for a particular topic, find the subject in the left-hand column of the table finding guide and then look across the columns using the headings at the top for the desired type of geographic area. Figure I-1 is an example of a table finding guide.

The table finding guide does not include cross-classification of subject-matter items. Additional informa-tion to locate data within specific reports is provided in the headnote at the top of the table finding guide and in the footnotes at the bottom of the guide.

Figure I-1.

Geographic area

Population Housing units Area measurement

Average per square mile of land (density)

Number of places 2010 Census

Previous censuses

Change from

previous census 2010 Census

Previous censuses

Change from

previous census Total area Land area Population

Housing units

THE STATE1

Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,2,3,4,5,7,8,9,12 1,4,8,9 1,5,9 1,2,4,5,8,9,12 1,4,8,9 1,5,9 8,9 2,5,8,9 5,8,9 5,8,9 1,3Urban and rural . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,2,3,7,12 1 1 1,2,12 1 1 – 2 – – 3Current urban definition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,2,7,12 1 1 1,2,12 1 1 – 2 – – –1950–90 urban definition . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 1 1 1 1 1 – – – – –Urban and rural by size of place . . . . . . . 3 – – – – – – – – – 3In urbanized area and in urban cluster . . 2,7,12 – – 2,12 – – – 2 – – –Size of urban area . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 – – 2 – – – 2 – – –In place and not in place . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,7 – – – – – – – – – 3

COUNTY2

Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,5,6,8 4,6,8 5,6 4,8 4,8 5 8 5,8 5,8 5,8 –Urban and rural . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 – – – – – – – – – –By percent change rank . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 6 6 – – – – – – – –

COUNTY SUBDIVISION3

By county . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 8 – 8 8 – 8 8 8 8 –Alphabetically . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 –By 2010 rank . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10a 10a – 10a 10a – – – – – –By percent change rank . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11a 11a 11a – – – – – – – –

PLACE

By county and county subdivision . . . . . . 8 8 – 8 8 – 8 8 8 8 –Alphabetically . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 –By 2010 rank . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 10 – 10 10 – – – – – –By percent change rank . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 11 11 – – – – – – – –

URBAN AREA

Urbanized area and urban cluster . . . . . . 12 – 12 – – – – – – – –1 State, District of Columbia, or Puerto Rico .2 Parish in Louisiana; city and borough, municipality, borough, or census area in Alaska; and municipio in Puerto Rico; in Maryland, Missouri, Nevada, and Virginia, one or more cities

are independent of counties and are treated as statistical equivalents of counties; the entire District of Columbia, which has no counties, is treated as a county equivalent .3 County subdivisions within the state are shown alphabetically with places for the following 12 states: Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New Hampshire,

New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Wisconsin .

Table Finding Guide

SUBJECTS BY TYPE OF GEOGRAPHIC AREA AND TABLE NUMBER

The types of geographic areas covered in this report are shown on the side, and subjects are shown at the top. See CPH-2-A, Population and Housing Unit Counts, Selected Appendixes (<www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/cph-2-a.pdf>), for a description of area classifications (Appendix A) and for definitions and explanations of subject characteristics (Appendix B).

Table Fin

din

g G

uid

e II-1

U.S. C

ensu

s Bureau

, 20

10

Cen

sus

HOW TO USE THE STATISTICAL TABLES

Parts of a Statistical Table

The census data included in printed reports are arranged in tables. Each table includes four major parts: (1) heading, (2) boxhead, (3) stub, and (4) data field. A typical census report table is illustrated in Figure I-2.

The heading consists of the table number, title, and headnote. The table number indicates the position of the table within the report, while the title is a brief statement indicating the subjects and time reference of the data presented in the table. The headnote is enclosed in brackets and is located under the title. It contains statements that qualify, explain, or provide information pertaining to the entire table.


The boxhead is under the heading. This portion of the table, which contains the individual column heads or captions, describes the data in each vertical column. In the boxhead of many tables, a spanner appears across and above two or more column heads or across two or more lower spanners. The purpose of a spanner is to classify or qualify items below it or separate the table into identifiable blocks in terms of major aspects of the data.

The stub is located at the left edge of the table. It includes a listing of line or row captions or descriptions. At the top of the stub is the stubhead. The stubhead is considered to be an extension of the table title and usually shows generic geographic area designations and restrictions.

Race in combination with one or more other races Race alone or in combination with one or more other races

Asian

NativeHawaiian

and OtherPaci�c

Islander

AmericanIndian

andAlaskaNative

SomeOther Race

Black orAfrican

AmericanWhite White

Black orAfrican

American

AmericanIndian

andAlaskaNative Asian

NativeHawaiian

and OtherPaci�c

IslanderSome

Other Race

Table 6.

[For information on con�dentiality protection, nonsampling error, and de�nitions, see Selected Appendixes at <www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/cph-1-a.pdf>]

Population for Selected Categories of Race: 2010

StateCountyPlace

18,775 14,109 5,718 5,152 816 5,026 637,392 205,923 33,7019,899 1,216 35,545 Delaware.........................................................

COUNTY

4,523 3,595 1,558 1,215 215 838 114,522 42,508 4,5212,601 306 4,073 Kent County.........................................................10,502 7,949 2,895 3,333 409 3,171 363,457 135,735 26,6334,469 568 22,286 New Castle County............................................

3,750 2,565 1,265 604 192 1,017 159,413 27,680 2,5472,829 342 9,186 Sussex County.....................................................

PLACE

3 1 1 2 0 1 428 6 33 0 3 Arden village, New Castle County.................1 0 0 1 0 0 199 21 120 0 0 Ardencroft village, New Castle County..........8 2 0 5 0 2 256 4 110 0 2 Ardentown village, New Castle County.........

522 447 149 132 11 201 10,298 7,129 944211 16 1,527 Bear CDP, New Castle County........................13 5 2 5 2 7 1,096 80 194 3 9 Bellefonte town, New Castle County.............

5 3 1 1 0 0 1,054 5 51 0 0 Bethany Beach town, Sussex County...........2 2 0 0 0 0 164 8 10 0 0 Bethel town, Sussex County...........................

45 46 6 0 3 7 802 391 1015 3 74 Blades town, Sussex County............................3 1 1 1 0 1 318 7 54 0 5 Bowers town, Kent County.............................

62 51 16 8 5 12 1,391 545 1419 7 152 Bridgeville town, Sussex County...................

445 325 118 80 35 125 10,218 3,070 529172 37 912 Brookside CDP, New Castle County.............124 104 49 52 0 13 2,413 920 18060 1 63 Camden town, Kent County............................

50 32 32 12 10 13 793 497 4668 10 47 Cheswold town, Kent County........................149 112 34 32 5 25 5,435 2,344 34762 14 240 Claymont CDP, New Castle County..............

73 73 21 16 1 13 2,105 791 3327 1 63 Clayton town........................................................73 73 21 16 1 13 2,105 791 3327 1 63 Kent County (part)............................................

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 New Castle County (part)..............................

17 16 4 3 0 2 706 69 312 0 36 Dagsboro town, Sussex County....................64 46 16 5 0 5 1,473 231 2217 0 20 Delaware City city, New Castle County..........75 67 21 7 1 4 1,281 344 1827 1 19 Delmar town, Sussex County..........................

4 3 0 0 1 0 318 12 11 3 10 Dewey Beach town, Sussex County.............1,053 1,097 375 328 52 195 18,446 16,312 1,310571 75 960 Dover city, Kent County...................................

216 122 47 85 23 37 2,699 580 16355 32 200 Dover Base Housing CDP, Kent County........99 115 39 9 1 16 3,499 2,089 7258 1 99 Edgemoor CDP, New Castle County............

8 13 6 3 2 0 242 125 56 4 15 Ellendale town, Sussex County.....................165 123 44 33 0 116 4,435 925 13992 0 786 Elsmere town, New Castle County................

0 0 0 0 0 0 110 0 00 0 0 Farmington town, Kent County........................48 38 12 3 0 12 998 290 2520 1 23 Felton town, Kent County.................................

1 0 1 0 0 0 371 2 31 0 3 Fenwick Island town, Sussex County............10 11 4 0 2 5 407 249 114 2 190 Frankford town, Sussex County....................32 33 14 2 0 7 558 183 914 1 57 Frederica town, Kent County.........................

200 85 51 8 2 133 3,191 1,018 78328 11 2,038 Georgetown town, Sussex County................312 276 71 121 6 67 9,505 3,862 937119 10 309 Glasgow CDP, New Castle County................

24 10 3 22 0 6 2,018 121 1903 0 28 Greenville CDP, New Castle County.............28 12 17 5 0 0 718 211 1117 0 48 Greenwood town, Sussex County.................

120 102 55 15 10 15 2,568 931 4376 14 94 Harrington city, Kent County.........................0 0 0 0 0 0 72 0 01 1 0 Hartly town, Kent County..................................0 0 0 0 0 0 118 3 10 0 0 Henlopen Acres town, Sussex County..........

96 71 24 44 7 14 2,725 579 18945 10 45 Highland Acres CDP, Kent County................

188 38 38 132 8 31 11,712 434 1,42959 17 102 Hockessin CDP, New Castle County............2 2 0 1 0 1 346 22 42 0 3 Houston town, Kent County..........................

51 38 17 17 1 8 1,302 505 6529 1 55 Kent Acres CDP, Kent County.........................8 6 2 0 0 0 242 12 02 0 13 Kenton town, Kent County..............................

135 155 33 38 15 37 1,889 1,668 7275 33 188 Laurel town, Sussex County............................6 6 0 0 0 0 170 9 04 0 6 Leipsic town, Kent County...............................

34 26 17 4 1 1 2,502 237 1427 3 10 Lewes city, Sussex County................................5 1 4 0 0 0 214 6 17 0 1 Little Creek town, Kent County........................6 3 5 0 0 1 1,896 44 710 0 31 Long Neck CDP, Sussex County....................7 2 4 2 0 1 182 28 314 0 6 Magnolia town, Kent County.........................

457 405 107 132 19 131 12,145 5,772 841143 27 597 Middletown town, New Castle County...........

189 176 65 27 23 60 6,404 2,304 137115 45 838 Milford city............................................................93 91 24 8 8 41 1,906 1,526 4653 13 374 Kent County (part)............................................96 85 41 19 15 19 4,498 778 9162 32 464 Sussex County (part).......................................

90 97 29 20 7 23 2,863 792 14949 7 154 Millsboro town, Sussex County.....................9 1 1 7 0 0 515 14 111 0 12 Millville town, Sussex County........................

75 76 20 3 0 12 2,027 497 1838 1 92 Milton town, Sussex County............................626 318 141 325 31 112 26,532 2,412 2,570194 41 519 Newark city, New Castle County...................101 95 39 19 2 31 3,660 1,530 8057 2 105 New Castle city, New Castle County.............

29 26 6 5 2 9 744 220 219 2 100 Newport town, New Castle County................83 20 8 61 0 27 7,066 270 68711 0 48 North Star CDP, New Castle County.............17 8 6 5 1 3 1,835 24 297 1 8 Ocean View town, Sussex County................12 10 4 5 0 2 334 35 94 0 2 Odessa town, New Castle County..................

20 Delaware Summary Population and Housing CharacteristicsU.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

Figure I-2.

PARTS OF A STATISTICAL TABLETable number and title Headnote

Heading

Stubhead

Stub

Sidehead

State name andpage number Report title

Spanner

Column head

Boxhead

Data field

I-4 How to Use This Census ReportU.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

In the stub, several features are used to help the user better understand the contents of the table. Usually, a block of data lines is preceded by a sidehead. The sidehead, similar to a spanner, describes and classifies the stub entries following it. The use of indentation in a stub indicates the relationship of one data line to another. Indented data lines represent subcategories that, in most instances, sum to a total. Occasionally in tables, it is desirable to show one or more single-line subcategories that do not sum to the total.

The data field is that part of the statistical table that contains the data. It extends from the bottom of the boxhead to the bottom of the table and from the right of the stub to the right edge of the page.

Both geographic and subject-matter terms appear in tables. It is important to read the definitions of the terms used in the tables because census terms often are defined in special ways that reflect the manner in which the questions were asked and the data were tabulated. Definitions of geographic terms are provided in Appendix A of CPH-2-A, Population and Housing Unit Counts, Selected Appendixes (<www.census.gov /prod/cen2010/cph-2-a.pdf>). Census tables often include derived measures such as medians, means, per-centages, and ratios. These and other subject-matter terms are defined in Appendix B of the same report.

Symbols and Geographic Abbreviations

The following symbols are used in the tables and explanations of subjects covered in 2010 Census reports:

• A dash ‘‘–’’ represents zero or a derived measure that rounds to less than 0.1.

• (X) means not applicable. In the 1990 and earlier decennial census reports, three dots ‘‘. . . ’’ meant not applicable.

• (NA) means not available.

• The superscript prefix ‘‘r’’ indicates that a Census 2000 count has been revised since the publication of the Census 2000 reports as a result of certified Count Question Resolution (CQR) changes (see also <www.census.gov/prod/cen2000/notes/errata.pdf>). This symbol appears only in the 2010 Census CPH-2, Population and Housing Unit Counts, report series.

• A minus sign ‘‘–’’ preceding a figure denotes decrease. The minus sign appears only in the 2010 Census CPH-2, Population and Housing Unit Counts, report series.

The following are examples of geographic abbreviations and terms that may be used in the tables in this report:

• A ‘‘(part)’’ next to the name of a geographic area in a hierarchical presentation indicates that the geo-graphic entity is located only partially in the superior geographic entity. For example, a ‘‘(part)’’ next to a place name in a county subdivision-place hierarchy indicates that the place is located in more than one county subdivision. (Places also may be ‘‘split’’ by county, congressional district, urban/rural, metropoli-tan area, voting district, and other geographic boundaries, depending on the presentation.) Other geo-graphic entities also can be ‘‘split’’ by a higher-level entity. The exception is a tabulation block, which is unique within all geographic entities in census products.

• ANVSA is Alaska Native village statistical area.

• ANRC is Alaska Native Regional Corporation.

• CCD is census county division.

• CDP is census designated place.

• CSA is combined statistical area.

• NECTA is New England city and town area.

• Metro Area is metropolitan statistical area.


• Micro Area is micropolitan statistical area.

• OTSA is Oklahoma tribal statistical area.

• SDTSA is state designated tribal statistical area.

• TDSA is tribal designated statistical area.

• UT is unorganized territory.

GRAPHICS

Charts, statistical maps, and other graphic summaries are included in some 2010 Census reports.

USER NOTES

User notes include general explanatory information, historical notes, and geographic notes. They also pro-vide information about unique characteristics of the report and sometimes changes or corrections made too late to be reflected in the text or tables themselves. However, sometimes this information becomes available too late to be reflected even in the user notes. Therefore, updates are available in the Notes and Errata document at <www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/notes/errata.pdf>.

APPENDIXES

Appendixes A through D, and F through H, described below, are in the separate printed volume, CPH-2-A, Population and Housing Unit Counts, Selected Appendixes, or on the Internet at <www.census.gov/prod /cen2010/cph-2-a.pdf>. Appendix E is included in this report.

Appendix A, Geographic Terms and Concepts. Provides definitions of the types of geographic areas and related information used in census products.

Appendix B, Definitions of Subject Characteristics. Contains definitions for the subject-matter terms used in census products, including explanations of derived measures, limitations of the data, and com-parability with previous censuses. The subjects are listed alphabetically. Population characteristics are defined first, followed by the definitions of the housing subjects.

Appendix C, Data Collection and Processing Procedures. Explains the 2010 Census mission and scope and provides thumbnail descriptions of 2010 Census operations.

Appendix D, Questionnaire. Presents a facsimile of the 2010 Census questionnaire used to collect the data in this report.

Appendix E, Maps. Contains maps depicting the geographic areas shown in this report.

Appendix F, Operational Overview and Accuracy of the Data. Provides information on 2010 Census operations, including group quarters enumeration, confidentiality of the data, imputation of housing unit status and population counts, sources of errors in the data, and data editing.

Appendix G, Residence Rule and Residence Situations for the 2010 Census of the United States. Contains a description of the residence rule and residence situations used by Census Bureau staff to guide decisions on where people should be counted in the 2010 Census. This document is the basis for residence-related sections of questionnaires, collection instruments, field materials, and training materials.

Appendix H, Acknowledgments. Lists many of the U.S. Census Bureau staff who participated in report preparation.

Table Fin

din

g G

uid

e II-1

U.S. C

ensu

s Bureau

, 20

10

Cen

sus

Geographic area

Population Housing units Area measurement

Average per square mile of land (density)

Number of places 2010 Census

Previous censuses

Change from

previous census 2010 Census

Previous censuses

Change from

previous census Total area Land area Population

Housing units

THE STATE1

Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,2,3,4,5,7,8,9,12 1,4,8,9 1,5,9 1,2,4,5,8,9,12 1,4,8,9 1,5,9 8,9 2,5,8,9 5,8,9 5,8,9 1,3Urban and rural . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,2,3,7,12 1 1 1,2,12 1 1 – 2 – – 3Current urban definition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,2,7,12 1 1 1,2,12 1 1 – 2 – – –1950–90 urban definition . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 1 1 1 1 1 – – – – –Urban and rural by size of place . . . . . . . 3 – – – – – – – – – 3In urbanized area and in urban cluster . . 2,7,12 – – 2,12 – – – 2 – – –Size of urban area . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 – – 2 – – – 2 – – –In place and not in place . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,7 – – – – – – – – – 3

COUNTY2

Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,5,6,8 4,6,8 5,6 4,8 4,8 5 8 5,8 5,8 5,8 –Urban and rural . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 – – – – – – – – – –By percent change rank . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 6 6 – – – – – – – –

COUNTY SUBDIVISION3

By county . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 8 – 8 8 – 8 8 8 8 –Alphabetically . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 –By 2010 rank . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10a 10a – 10a 10a – – – – – –By percent change rank . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11a 11a 11a – – – – – – – –

PLACE

By county and county subdivision . . . . . . 8 8 – 8 8 – 8 8 8 8 –Alphabetically . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 –By 2010 rank . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 10 – 10 10 – – – – – –By percent change rank . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 11 11 – – – – – – – –

URBAN AREA

Urbanized area and urban cluster . . . . . . 12 – 12 – – – – – – – –1 State, District of Columbia, or Puerto Rico .2 Parish in Louisiana; city and borough, municipality, borough, or census area in Alaska; and municipio in Puerto Rico; in Maryland, Missouri, Nevada, and Virginia, one or more cities

are independent of counties and are treated as statistical equivalents of counties; the entire District of Columbia, which has no counties, is treated as a county equivalent .3 County subdivisions within the state are shown alphabetically with places for the following 12 states: Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New Hampshire,

New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Wisconsin .

SUBJECTS BY TYPE OF GEOGRAPHIC AREA AND TABLE NUMBER

The types of geographic areas covered in this report are shown on the side, and subjects are shown at the top. See CPH-2-A, Population and Housing Unit Counts, Selected Appendixes (<www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/cph-2-a.pdf>), for a description of area classifications (Appendix A) and for definitions and explanations of subject characteristics (Appendix B).

inding Guideable fT

User Notes III-1U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

User Notes

Additional information concerning this 2010 Census product may become available after this report is published. This information, called Notes and Errata, is available in portable document format (PDF) on the U.S. Census Bureau’s Internet site at <www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/notes/errata.pdf>.

GENERAL NOTES

User Note 1

The user should be aware that there are limitations to many of these data. Please refer to the text provided with this report for further explanation of the limitations of the data. The population and other data shown for the 2010 Census in this report are as of April 1, 2010; the boundaries used for all geographic entities are as of January 1, 2010. All boundaries are intended for Census Bureau statistical data collection and presentation only; their depiction and designation for statistical purposes do not constitute a determina-tion of jurisdictional authority or entitlement. Corrections to the 2010 Census data as a result of certified Count Question Resolution (CQR) changes are available from the Census Bureau’s Internet site at <www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/notes/errata.pdf>.

User Note 2

Data comparability for county subdivisions is shown only when the county subdivision contains sub-stantially the same territory as reported for Census 2000 (generally defined as at least 60 percent of the previous territory). There is no comparability provided for county subdivisions that have been extensively revised. Revised entities are noted by and within county. Changes to a geographic entity can be the result of legal change actions, statistical redefinition, correction of previous boundary or drafting errors, or new erroneous information.

Incorporated place and census designated place (CDP) comparability is provided for all places that retained their name or general area without regard to the amount of territorial change between censuses. Place comparability is not shown if the entity is new for the 2010 Census or is the result of a merger that created an entirely new entity, or if a 2010 Census geographic area shares no area with a Census 2000 area of the same name. American Indian area (including tribal subdivisions), Alaska Native area, and Hawaiian home land comparability follows the same rules as for place comparability.

User Note 3

When applicable, tables show the revised Census 2000 population and/or housing unit counts that resulted from the Count Question Resolution (CQR) program. These revised counts are accompanied by a prefix “r” symbol in the data tables.

Derived values (e.g., percent distribution, density, or change) that are calculated from Census 2000 popu-lation or housing unit counts only account for the aforementioned CQR revisions in certain cases.

• Calculations include the corrected Census 2000 counts when a table:

º Shows population or housing unit change (or percent change) from 2000 to 2010.

º Shows population or housing unit change (or percent change) from 1990 to 2000, and also shows the 2000 population or housing unit count that it is derived from.

º Shows population or housing unit density or percent distribution in 2000, and also shows the 2000 population or housing unit count that it is derived from.

III-2 User NotesU.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

• Calculations do not include the corrected Census 2000 counts when a table:

º Shows population or housing unit change (or percent change) from 1990 to 2000, but does not show the 2000 population or housing unit count that it is derived from.

º Shows population or housing unit density or percent distribution in 2000, but does not show the 2000 population or housing unit count that it is derived from.

• When a table shows component parts of a revised 2000 population or housing unit count (e.g., clas-sified by urban/rural or by size of place), the component parts may not sum to the total population or housing unit count, because the component parts were not revised during the 2000 CQR program. Therefore, any derived values (e.g., percent distribution or number of places by population size) for the component parts cannot account for the revised Census 2000 counts either.

HISTORICAL NOTES

The United States acquired most of the area of North Dakota from France in 1803 as part of the Louisiana Purchase. It obtained the area in the north and northeast part of the present-day state by a convention, signed with Great Britain in 1818 that extended the northern boundary along the 49th parallel. Dakota Territory was organized on March 2, 1861, from unorganized area formerly within Minnesota Territory and part of Nebraska Territory. Dakota Territory included all of the present-day states of North Dakota and South Dakota, most of Montana, the northern half of Wyoming, and a small part of Nebraska. The territory was reduced in 1863 with the organization of Idaho Territory, enlarged in 1864 with the addition of most of the remainder of present-day Wyoming, and again reduced with the organization of Wyoming Territory in 1868. In 1882, the state of Nebraska acquired an area north of the Keya Paha River and Niobrara River. North Dakota was admitted to the Union simultaneously with South Dakota on November 2, 1889, as the 39th and 40th states, with generally the same boundaries as the present states.

Census data for the combined area in present-day North Dakota and South Dakota are available in the 1860 census (and listed in national tables with South Dakota). The 1860 census population is for territory reported as ‘‘unorganized Dakota’’ and includes population in areas now in Montana. The 1860 population excludes some population enumerated in Nebraska Territory. Although the state had not yet been legally established, the 1870 and 1880 populations generally are for the area of the present state. The population of Dakota Territory as legally established was 135,177 in 1880 and 14,181 in 1870.

GEOGRAPHIC NOTES

North Dakota is divided into 53 counties. The 1,765 county subdivisions in the state include 1,317 govern-mentally functioning townships. In 28 counties, some or all of the territory is not organized into town-ships, and the Census Bureau recognizes 84 unorganized territories in those areas. All 357 incorporated places are independent of any county subdivision, creating 364 entities that the Census Bureau treats as equivalent to county subdivisions. There are 44 CDPs in North Dakota. Incorporated places in the state are legally described as cities, and all are independent of any county subdivision. The Census Bureau treats all CDPs as dependent within county subdivisions.

GEOGRAPHIC CHANGE NOTES

The Geographic Change Notes listed below document high-level geographic entities—American Indian areas, Alaska Native areas, and Hawaiian home lands; counties and their equivalents; county subdivi-sions; and places—that are different from the information reported in Census 2000. The notes identify geographic entities whose name, legal description, and/or boundary have changed, entities that no longer exist, newly established entities (both legal and statistical), and changes in geographic relationships, such as places that exist in one county and have expanded into or withdrawn from another county (the notes do not identify the other county(ies) in which the entity exists; this can be determined from Table 9 of this publication), places that have been removed from comparable 2000 county subdivisions, and places that have become independent of or dependent within one or more county subdivisions. The changes are


reported by and within county; counties without changes are not shown in the listing. Changes to Ameri-can Indian areas, Alaska Native areas, and Hawaiian home lands appear after the list of counties; areas with no changes are not shown. A few of the reported changes in name, legal status, or legal relationship may be incorrect; if so, the correct version is shown in any Correction Notes section above. Some changes are the result of legal actions that took place prior to Census 2000 but were not reported in that census.

For the 2010 Census, the notes reflect any boundary change that affects a geographic entity, regardless of whether it is the result of legal action, redefinition of a statistical entity, correction of a previous draft-ing error, or new erroneous information. Between Census 2000 and the 2010 Census, the Census Bureau invested in improving the coordinate accuracy of its geographic database. As a result, the geographic positions of boundaries may be different between the two censuses even though little or no change actu-ally occurred to the boundaries. In compiling the Geographic Change Notes, the Census Bureau inspected the many corrections to determine if a change actually affected significant land area or population. For example, the county-level text ‘‘all MCDs [minor civil divisions] revised’’ may reflect a legal redistricting of all county subdivisions in the county, a major or minor relocation of county subdivision boundaries due to more accurate mapping or more accurate boundary information, or a combination of these that, in one way or another, affect every county subdivision in a county. Boundary corrections that resulted in incor-porated places gaining or losing territory are shown as annexations or detachments even if no legal action occurred between 2000 and 2010. Most places shown with a detachment resulted from such corrections. In states whose legal entities rarely undergo a legal boundary change, such as the New England states, most of the entities reported to have annexed, detached, exchanged, gained, or lost territory did so as the result of mapping changes, not legal actions. The extent and location of the boundary changes affecting any particular entity can be determined by comparing the TIGER/Line® Shapefiles, Cartographic Boundary Files, or a comparable set of maps for the 2000 and 2010 censuses.

Counties, County Subdivisions, and Places

Adams County—Disorganizations: Whetstone township in 2006 (included in West Adams UT); MCD Changes: West Adams UT formed from merger of disorganized Whetstone township and Lemmon UT.

Barnes County—Annexations from MCDs: Valley City city from Valley township; Wimbledon city from Pierce township.

Benson County—MCD Changes: Lohnes township gained area from Warwick township; Annexations from MCDs: Minnewaukan city from West Bay township; Detachments to MCDs: Minnewaukan city to West Bay township; CDP Changes: Fort Totten CDP gained area.

Bottineau County—MCD Changes: Starbuck township gained area from Stone Creek township; Annexations from MCDs: Bottineau city from Whitteron township; Maxbass city from Hastings township; Detachments to MCDs: Maxbass city to Hastings township.

Bowman County—Annexations from MCDs: Bowman city from Bowman township.

Burke County—Disincorporations: Larson city in 2003 (added to Keller township and defined as a CDP for 2010); New CDPs: Larson (formed from part of disincorporated Larson city and additional area).

Burleigh County—Annexations from MCDs: Bismarck city from Apple Creek, Gibbs, and Hay Creek town-ships and Lincoln-Fort Rice UT; Lincoln city from Apple Creek township; Detachments to MCDs: Bismarck city to Gibbs and Hay Creek townships; Lincoln city to Apple Creek township; New CDPs: Driscoll and Menoken.

Cass County—Annexations from MCDs: Arthur city from Arthur township; Casselton city from Casselton and Everest townships; Davenport city from Davenport township; Fargo city from Barnes, Pleasant, Reed, and Stanley townships; Harwood city from Harwood and Reed townships; Horace city from Normanna, Pleasant, Stanley, and Warren townships; Kindred city from Normanna township; Leonard city from Leonard


township; West Fargo city from Barnes, Mapleton, and Reed townships; Detachments to MCDs: Briarwood city to Stanley township; Casselton city to Everest township; New CDPs: Brooktree Park and Embden.

Cavalier County—Disincorporations: Hove Mobile Park city in 2002 (added to Osnabrock township); Annexations from MCDs: Milton city from Montrose township; Munich city from Henderson and Trier townships; Detachments: Munich city to Henderson and Trier townships.

Dickey County—Annexations from MCDs: Ellendale city from Ellendale township; Fullerton city from Maple township; Oakes city from Bear Creek township; Detachments to MCDs: Oakes city to Bear Creek township.

Divide County—Annexations from MCDs: Crosby city from Fillmore township; Noonan city from Coalfield township.

Dunn County—New CDPs: Manning.

Emmons County—Disorganizations: Hazelton township in 2001 and Buchanan Valley, Lincoln, and Tell townships in 2007 (all added to North Emmons UT); MCD Changes: North Emmons UT includes disor-ganized Buchanan Valley, Hazelton, Lincoln, and Tell townships and gained area from parts of deleted Northeast Emmons and West Emmons UTs; South Emmons UT gained area from parts of deleted Northeast Emmons and West Emmons UTs; Annexations from MCDs: Hazelton city from North Emmons UT; Detachments to MCDs: Strasburg city to South Emmons UT.

Foster County—Annexations from MCDs: Carrington city from Carrington and Wyard townships; Glenfield city from Glenfield township.

Golden Valley County—Disorganizations: Elmwood township in 2006 (taken to form Elmwood UT); Annexations from MCDs: Beach city from Beach township; Detachments to MCDs: Beach city to Beach township.

Grand Forks County—Annexations from MCDs: Grand Forks city from Brenna and Grand Forks townships; Larimore city from Larimore township; Manvel city from Ferry township; Northwood city from Northwood township; Detachments to MCDs: Larimore city to Larimore township.

Grant County—Disorganizations: Otter Creek in 2000 (added to East Grant UT); Annexations from MCDs: Elgin city from Minnie township; New CDPs: Heil and Raleigh.

Griggs County—New CDPs: Jessie and Sutton.

Hettinger County—Disorganizations: Alden and Indian Creek townships in 2005 (merged to form Central Hettinger UT).

Kidder County—Disorganizations: Kickapoo township in 1996 (not reported until 2006) (taken to form Kickapoo UT); Annexations from MCDs: Tappen city from Tappen township; Detachments to MCDs: Dawson city to Sibley township; Tappen city to Tappen township.

LaMoure County—Annexations from MCDs: Kulm city from Norden township; LaMoure city from Ryan township.

Logan County—Disorganizations: Bryant (in 2009), Dixon (in 2001), and Starkey (in 2005) townships (all added to West Logan UT); MCD Changes: West Logan UT includes disorganized Bryant, Dixon, and Starkey townships and gained area from East Logan UT; Annexations from MCDs: Napoleon city from West Logan UT,

McKenzie County—Disincorporations: Rawson city in 2002 (parts added to Alex and Arnegard townships); Mergers: Elk, Poe, and Wilbur townships merged to form Tri township in 2002; Detachments to MCDs: Watford City city to Central McKenzie UT; New CDPs: East Fairview.


McLean County—Annexations from MCDs: Garrison city from North Central McLean UT; Turtle Lake city from Lake Williams township; Underwood city from Underwood UT; Detachments to MCDs: Garrison city to North Central McLean UT.

Mercer County—Annexations from MCDs: Beulah city from West Mercer UT; Hazen city from East Mercer UT.

Morton County—Annexations from MCDs: Glen Ullin city from West Morton UT; Mandan city from Captain’s Landing township and Mandan UT; New CDPs: Harmon.

Mountrail County—Annexations from MCDs: New Town city from Osborn township; Stanley city from Idaho township; Detachments to MCDs: Stanley city to Idaho township.

Nelson County—New CDPs: Dahlen.

Oliver County—Annexations from MCDs: Center city from East Oliver UT.

Pembina County—Annexations from MCDs: Cavalier city from Cavalier township; Drayton city from Drayton township; Detachments to MCDs: Bathgate city to Bathgate township; Hamilton city to Hamilton township.

Pierce County—Name Changes: Alexanter township name corrected from Alexander; Annexations from MCDs: Rugby city from North Pierce UT; New CDPs: Barton, Orrin, and Selz.

Ramsey County—Name Changes: Hope township name changed from Nixon; Organizations: North Creel township organized in 2000 from part of Creel township; Annexations from MCDs: Devils Lake city from Creel and North Creel townships; Detachments to MCDs: Devils Lake city to Creel township.

Ransom County—Annexations from MCDs: Enderlin city from Liberty township; Sheldon city from Greene township; New CDPs: Englevale and McLeod.

Richland County—Annexations from MCDs: Christine city from Eagle township; Colfax city from Colfax township; Hankinson city from Waldo township; Wahpeton city from Center and Dwight townships.

Rolette County—Annexations from MCDs: Rolla city from East Rolette UT; St. John city from North Rolette UT; New CDPs: Green Acres; CDP Changes: East Dunseith and Shell Valley CDPs gained area.

Sargent County—Annexations from MCDs: Gwinner city from Whitestone Hill township; New CDPs: De Lamere.

Sheridan County—Disorganizations: Holmes and New Germantown townships in 2004 (both added to North Sheridan UT); MCD Changes: Central Sheridan UT merged into North Sheridan UT; North Sheridan UT includes disorganized Holmes and New Germantown townships and merged Central Sheridan UT; Annexations from MCDs: Martin city from Martin township; New CDPs: Denhoff.

Sioux County—New CDPs: Porcupine.

Slope County—Disorganizations: Dovre township in 2003 (taken to form part of Northeast Slope UT); Slope Center township in 2007 (taken to form part of Central Slope UT); Sunshine township in 2008 (added to Northwest Slope UT); MCD Changes: Central Slope UT formed from merger of disorganized Slope Center township and Chalky Butte UT; Northeast Slope UT formed from merger of disorganized Dovre township and E-Six UT; Northwest Slope UT includes disorganized Sunshine township and gained area from West Slope UT; West Slope UT lost area to Northwest Slope UT.

Stark County—Annexations from MCDs: Dickinson city from Dickinson North UT.

Stutsman County—Annexations from MCDs: Jamestown city from Bloom, Homer, and Woodbury townships; Detachments to MCDs: Montpelier city to Montpelier township; New CDPs: Spiritwood and Ypsilanti.

Towner County—Disincorporations: Maza city in 2002 (added to Maza township).


Traill County—Annexations from MCDs: Hillsboro city from Hillsboro township; Mayville city from Mayville township; New CDPs: Blanchard and Caledonia.

Walsh County—Annexations from MCDs: Edinburg city from Lampton township; New CDPs: Auburn and Nash.

Ward County—Annexations from MCDs: Berthold city from Berthold township; Burlington city from Burlington township; Minot city from Afton, Harrison, and Nedrose townships; Detachments to MCDs: Berthold city to Berthold township; New CDPs: Foxholm, Logan, and Ruthville; CDP Changes: Minot AFB CDP gained and lost area.

Wells County—Annexations from MCDs: Harvey city from Hillsdale and Wells townships; Detachments to MCDs: Harvey city to Wells township; New CDPs: Heimdal.

Williams County—Disorganizations: Hofflund township (added to Southeast Williams UT); Organizations: Pherrin township organized from all of Pherrin UT; MCD Changes: Disorganized Hofflund township and Nesson Valley UT merged into Southeast Williams UT; Annexations from MCDs: Williston city from Stony Creek and Williston townships.

American Indian Areas

Lake Traverse Reservation and Off-Reservation Trust Land (part)—Added off-reservation trust land in Richland County; Tribal Subdivision Change: Heipa District gained area not in a 2000 tribal subdivision in Richland County.

Spirit Lake Reservation—Lost area and removed from Wells County and lost additional area in Benson, Eddy, and Ramsey counties; Tribal Subdivision Changes: Crow Hill and St. Michael Districts lost primar-ily water area to area not in a 2010 tribal subdivision in Benson and Ramsey Counties; Fort Totten District lost primarily water area to area not in a 2010 tribal subdivision in Benson and Ramsey Counties (removed from Ramsey County); Wood Lake District lost primarily water area to area not in a 2010 tribal subdivision in Benson County.

Turtle Mountain Reservation and Off-Reservation Trust Land (part)—Off-reservation trust land portion lost area in Rolette County.

Crosswalk of Urban Areas and Places IV-1U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

Crosswalk of Urban Areas and Places: 2010 Urban Area Place Within Urban Area

URBANIZED AREA

Bismarck, ND Urbanized Area Bismarck city (part)Mandan city (part)

Fargo, ND--MN Urbanized Area Briarwood city (part)Fargo city (part)Frontier cityHorace city (part)North River city (part)Prairie Rose cityWest Fargo city (part)

Grand Forks, ND--MN Urbanized Area (part) Grand Forks city (part)

URBAN CLUSTER

Beulah, ND Urban Cluster Beulah city (part)

Devils Lake, ND Urban Cluster Devils Lake city (part)

Dickinson, ND Urban Cluster Dickinson city (part)

Grafton, ND Urban Cluster Grafton city (part)

Grand Forks AFB, ND Urban Cluster Emerado city (part)Grand Forks AFB CDP (part)

Jamestown, ND Urban Cluster Jamestown city (part)

Lincoln, ND Urban Cluster Lincoln city (part)

Minot, ND Urban Cluster Minot city (part)

Minot AFB, ND Urban Cluster Minot AFB CDP (part)

Rugby, ND Urban Cluster Rugby city (part)

Valley City, ND Urban Cluster Valley City city (part)

Wahpeton, ND--MN Urban Cluster (part) Wahpeton city (part)

Williston, ND Urban Cluster Williston city (part)

Population and Housing Unit Counts North Dakota 1U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

Table 1. Population: Earliest Census to 2010; and Housing Units: 1950 to 2010[For information concerning historical counts and geographic change, see “User Notes .” For information on confidentiality, nonsampling error, and definitions, see Appendixes]

State total Urban Rural Percent of total

State Change from Number of Change from Change from Urban and Rural preceding census places of preceding census preceding census

2,500 or Number Number Percent more Number Number Percent Number Number Percent Urban Rural

POPULATION

Current urban definition: 2010 (Apr . 1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 672,591 30,391 4 .7 16 402,872 43,914 12 .2 269,719 –13,523 –4 .8 59 .9 40 .1 2000 (Apr . 1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 642,200 3,400 0 .5 17 358,958 17,786 5 .2 283,242 –14,386 –4 .8 55 .9 44 .1 1990 (Apr . 1) . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1950–90 urban definition:

638,800 (X) (X) 19 341,172 (X) (X) 297,628 (X) (X) 53 .4 46 .6

1990 (Apr . 1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 638,800 –13,917 –2 .1 19 340,339 22,029 6 .9 298,461 –35,946 –10 .7 53 .3 46 .7 1980 (Apr . 1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 652,717 34,925 5 .7 20 318,310 44,868 16 .4 334,407 –9,912 –2 .9 48 .8 51 .2 1970 (Apr . 1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 617,792 –14,654 –2 .3 18 273,442 50,734 22 .8 344,319 –65,419 –16 .0 44 .3 55 .7 1960 (Apr . 1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 632,446 12,810 2 .1 15 222,708 57,891 35 .1 409,738 –45,081 –9 .9 35 .2 64 .8 1950 (Apr . 1) . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Pre-1950 urban definition:

619,636 (X) (X) 13 164,817 (X) (X) 454,819 (X) (X) 26 .6 73 .4

1960 (Apr . 1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 632,446 12,810 2 .1 15 221,694 56,877 34 .5 410,752 –44,067 –9 .7 35 .1 64 .9 1950 (Apr . 1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 619,636 –22,299 –3 .5 13 164,817 32,894 24 .9 454,819 –55,193 –10 .8 26 .6 73 .4 1940 (Apr . 1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 641,935 –38,910 –5 .7 12 131,923 18,617 16 .4 510,012 –57,527 –10 .1 20 .6 79 .4 1930 (Apr . 1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 680,845 33,973 5 .3 12 113,306 25,067 28 .4 567,539 8,906 1 .6 16 .6 83 .4 1920 (Jan . 1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 646,872 69,816 12 .1 12 88,239 25,003 39 .5 558,633 44,813 8 .7 13 .6 86 .4 1910 (Apr . 15) . . . . . . . . . . . . 577,056 257,910 80 .8 10 63,236 39,823 170 .1 513,820 218,087 73 .7 11 .0 89 .0 1900 (June 1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 319,146 128,163 67 .1 4 23,413 12,770 120 .0 295,733 115,393 64 .0 7 .3 92 .7 1890 (June 1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 190,983 154,074 417 .4 2 10,643 7,950 295 .2 180,340 146,124 427 .1 5 .6 94 .4 1880 (June 1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36,909 34,504 1,434 .7 1 2,693 2,693 (X) 34,216 31,811 1,322 .7 7 .3 92 .7 1870 (June 1) . . . . . . . . . . . . .

HOUSING UNITS

Current urban definition:

2,405 (X) (X) – – (X) (X) 2,405 (X) (X) – 100 .0

2010 (Apr . 1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 317,498 27,820 9 .6 (X) 182,040 25,495 16 .3 135,458 2,326 1 .7 57 .3 42 .7 2000 (Apr . 1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . r 289,678 13,338 4 .8 (X) 156,545 16,590 11 .9 133,132 –3,253 –2 .4 54 .0 46 .0 1990 (Apr . 1) . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1950–90 urban definition:

276,340 (X) (X) (X) 139,955 (X) (X) 136,385 (X) (X) 50 .6 49 .4

1990 (Apr . 1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 276,340 17,568 6 .8 (X) 139,382 17,301 14 .2 136,958 267 0 .2 50 .4 49 .6 1980 (Apr . 1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 258,772 54,537 26 .7 (X) 122,081 38,059 45 .3 136,691 16,491 13 .7 47 .2 52 .8 1970 (Apr . 1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 204,235 9,638 5 .0 (X) 84,022 17,845 27 .0 120,200 –8,220 –6 .4 41 .1 58 .9 1960 (Apr . 1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 194,597 18,828 10 .7 (X) 66,177 19,967 43 .2 128,420 –1,139 –0 .9 34 .0 66 .0 1950 (Apr . 1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 175,769 (X) (X) (X) 46,210 (X) (X) 129,559 (X) (X) 26 .3 73 .7

2 North Dakota Population and Housing Unit CountsU.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

Table 2. Population, Housing Units, and Land Area by Urban and Rural and Size of Urban Area: 2010[Areas classified by population size . For information on confidentiality, nonsampling error, and definitions, see Appendixes]

StateUrban and RuralSize of Urban Area [Population]

Population Housing units Land area Number of urban areas

TotalPercent

distribution TotalPercent

distributionIn square

milesPercent

distribution TotalEntirely in

statePartly in

state

North Dakota . . . . . . . . . . . . . 672,591 100 .0 317,498 100 .0 69,001 100 .0 16 13 3

Urban . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 402,872 59 .9 182,040 57 .3 184 0 .3 16 13 3

In urbanized area . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 269,056 40 .0 122,440 38 .6 112 0 .2 3 1 2 1,000,000 or more . . . . . . . . . . . . . – – – – – – – – – 500,000 to 999,999 . . . . . . . . . . . . – – – – – – – – – 250,000 to 499,999 . . . . . . . . . . . . – – – – – – – – – 100,000 to 249,999 . . . . . . . . . . . . 134,149 20 .0 61,615 19 .4 53 0 .1 1 – 1 50,000 to 99,999 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 134,907 20 .1 60,825 19 .2 59 0 .1 2 1 1

In urban cluster . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 133,816 19 .9 59,600 18 .8 72 0 .1 13 12 1 25,000 to 49,999 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42,650 6 .3 19,484 6 .1 22 – 1 1 – 10,000 to 24,999 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55,831 8 .3 24,909 7 .9 29 – 4 3 1 5,000 to 9,999 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19,654 2 .9 8,391 2 .6 12 – 3 3 – 2,500 to 4,999 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15,681 2 .3 6,816 2 .2 8 – 5 5 –

Cumulative summary:Urban area of — 1,000,000 or more . . . . . . . . . . . . . – – – – – – – – – 500,000 or more . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . – – – – – – – – – 250,000 or more . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . – – – – – – – – – 100,000 or more . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 134,149 20 .0 61,615 19 .4 53 0 .1 1 – 1 50,000 or more . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 269,056 40 .0 122,440 38 .6 112 0 .2 3 1 2 25,000 or more . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 311,706 46 .3 141,924 44 .7 135 0 .2 4 2 2 10,000 or more . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 367,537 54 .6 166,833 52 .6 164 0 .2 8 5 3 5,000 or more . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 387,191 57 .6 175,224 55 .2 176 0 .3 11 8 3 2,500 or more . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 402,872 59 .9 182,040 57 .3 184 0 .3 16 13 3

Rural . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 269,719 40 .1 135,458 42 .7 68,817 99 .7 (X) (X) (X)


This page is intentionally blank.


Table 3. Population by Urban and Rural and Size of Place: 2010[Places classified by population size. For information on confidentiality, nonsampling error, and definitions, see Appendixes]

Table 3. Population by Urban and Rural and Size of Place: 2010—Con.[Places classified by population size. For information on confidentiality, nonsampling error, and definitions, see Appendixes]

StateSize of Place [Population]

Total Urban Rural


PopulationNumber of

places

Percent of total

population Total

In place

Not in place Total

In place

Not in place

All urban places (entirely or partly urban) Entirely urban places Partly urban places All rural places

(entirely or partly rural) Entirely rural places Partly rural places

PopulationNumber of

places PopulationNumber of





places

North Dakota . . . . . . . . . . . 672,591 401 100 .0 402,872 395,625 24 287 2 395,338 22 7,247 269,719 128,499 399 126,159 377 2,340 22 141,220 North Dakota

In place . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 524,124 401 77 .9 395,625 395,625 24 287 2 395,338 22 (X) 128,499 128,499 399 126,159 377 2,340 22 (X) In place Not in place . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 148,467 (X) 22 .1 7,247 (X) (X) (X) (X) (X) (X) 7,247 141,220 (X) (X) (X) (X) (X) (X) 141,220 Not in place

In place of–— In place of— 1,000,000 or more . . . . . . . . . . . – – – – – – – – – – (X) – – – – – – – (X) 1,000,000 or more 500,000 to 999,999 . . . . . . . . . . – – – – – – – – – – (X) – – – – – – – (X) 500,000 to 999,999 250,000 to 499,999 . . . . . . . . . . – – – – – – – – – – (X) – – – – – – – (X) 250,000 to 499,999 100,000 to 249,999 . . . . . . . . . . 105,549 1 15.7 105,426 105,426 1 – – 105,426 1 (X) 123 123 1 – – 123 1 (X) 100,000 to 249,999 50,000 to 99,999 . . . . . . . . . . . . 114,110 2 17.0 113,982 113,982 2 – – 113,982 2 (X) 128 128 2 – – 128 2 (X) 50,000 to 99,999 25,000 to 49,999 . . . . . . . . . . . . 66,718 2 9.9 66,582 66,582 2 – – 66,582 2 (X) 136 136 2 – – 136 2 (X) 25,000 to 49,999 10,000 to 24,999 . . . . . . . . . . . . 66,261 4 9.9 65,498 65,498 4 – – 65,498 4 (X) 763 763 4 – – 763 4 (X) 10,000 to 24,999

5,000 to 9,999 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27,013 4 4.0 26,955 26,955 4 – – 26,955 4 (X) 58 58 4 – – 58 4 (X) 5,000 to 9,999 2,500 to 4,999 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,281 3 1.5 9,983 9,983 3 – – 9,983 3 (X) 298 298 3 – – 298 3 (X) 2,500 to 4,999 2,000 to 2,499 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20,451 9 3.0 6,444 6,444 3 – – 6,444 3 (X) 14,007 14,007 9 13,248 6 759 3 (X) 2,000 to 2,499 1,500 to 1,999 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14,297 8 2.1 – – – – – – – (X) 14,297 14,297 8 14,297 8 – – (X) 1,500 to 1,999 1,000 to 1,499 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25,712 21 3.8 – – – – – – – (X) 25,712 25,712 21 25,712 21 – – (X) 1,000 to 1,499 500 to 999 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36,105 50 5.4 – – – – – – – (X) 36,105 36,105 50 36,105 50 – – (X) 500 to 999 200 to 499 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19,866 66 3.0 623 623 2 214 1 409 1 (X) 19,243 19,243 65 19,238 64 5 1 (X) 200 to 499 Less than 200 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17,761 231 2.6 132 132 3 73 1 59 2 (X) 17,629 17,629 230 17,559 228 70 2 (X) Less than 200

Cumulative summary: Cumulative summary:In place of— In place of— 1,000,000 or more . . . . . . . . . . . – – – – – – – – – – (X) – – – – – – – (X) 1,000,000 or more 500,000 or more . . . . . . . . . . . . . – – – – – – – – – – (X) – – – – – – – (X) 500,000 or more 250,000 or more . . . . . . . . . . . . . – – – – – – – – – – (X) – – – – – – – (X) 250,000 or more 100,000 or more . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105,549 1 15.7 105,426 105,426 1 – – 105,426 1 (X) 123 123 1 – – 123 1 (X) 100,000 or more 50,000 or more . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 219,659 3 32.7 219,408 219,408 3 – – 219,408 3 (X) 251 251 3 – – 251 3 (X) 50,000 or more 25,000 or more . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 286,377 5 42.6 285,990 285,990 5 – – 285,990 5 (X) 387 387 5 – – 387 5 (X) 25,000 or more 10,000 or more . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 352,638 9 52.4 351,488 351,488 9 – – 351,488 9 (X) 1,150 1,150 9 – – 1,150 9 (X) 10,000 or more

5,000 or more . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 379,651 13 56.5 378,443 378,443 13 – – 378,443 13 (X) 1,208 1,208 13 – – 1,208 13 (X) 5,000 or more 2,500 or more . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 389,932 16 58.0 388,426 388,426 16 – – 388,426 16 (X) 1,506 1,506 16 – – 1,506 16 (X) 2,500 or more 2,000 or more . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 410,383 25 61.0 394,870 394,870 19 – – 394,870 19 (X) 15,513 15,513 25 13,248 6 2,265 19 (X) 2,000 or more 1,500 or more . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 424,680 33 63.1 394,870 394,870 19 – – 394,870 19 (X) 29,810 29,810 33 27,545 14 2,265 19 (X) 1,500 or more 1,000 or more . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 450,392 54 67.0 394,870 394,870 19 – – 394,870 19 (X) 55,522 55,522 54 53,257 35 2,265 19 (X) 1,000 or more 500 or more . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 486,497 104 72.3 394,870 394,870 19 – – 394,870 19 (X) 91,627 91,627 104 89,362 85 2,265 19 (X) 500 or more 200 or more . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 506,363 170 75.3 395,493 395,493 21 214 1 395,279 20 (X) 110,870 110,870 169 108,600 149 2,270 20 (X) 200 or more


Table 3. Population by Urban and Rural and Size of Place: 2010[Places classified by population size. For information on confidentiality, nonsampling error, and definitions, see Appendixes]

Table 3. Population by Urban and Rural and Size of Place: 2010—Con.[Places classified by population size. For information on confidentiality, nonsampling error, and definitions, see Appendixes]


Total Urban Rural


PopulationNumber of

places

Percent of total

population Total

In place

Not in place Total

In place

Not in place

All urban places (entirely or partly urban) Entirely urban places Partly urban places All rural places

(entirely or partly rural) Entirely rural places Partly rural places

PopulationNumber of






places

North Dakota . . . . . . . . . . . 672,591 401 100 .0 402,872 395,625 24 287 2 395,338 22 7,247 269,719 128,499 399 126,159 377 2,340 22 141,220 North Dakota

In place . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 524,124 401 77 .9 395,625 395,625 24 287 2 395,338 22 (X) 128,499 128,499 399 126,159 377 2,340 22 (X) In place Not in place . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 148,467 (X) 22 .1 7,247 (X) (X) (X) (X) (X) (X) 7,247 141,220 (X) (X) (X) (X) (X) (X) 141,220 Not in place

In place of–— In place of— 1,000,000 or more . . . . . . . . . . . – – – – – – – – – – (X) – – – – – – – (X) 1,000,000 or more 500,000 to 999,999 . . . . . . . . . . – – – – – – – – – – (X) – – – – – – – (X) 500,000 to 999,999 250,000 to 499,999 . . . . . . . . . . – – – – – – – – – – (X) – – – – – – – (X) 250,000 to 499,999 100,000 to 249,999 . . . . . . . . . . 105,549 1 15.7 105,426 105,426 1 – – 105,426 1 (X) 123 123 1 – – 123 1 (X) 100,000 to 249,999 50,000 to 99,999 . . . . . . . . . . . . 114,110 2 17.0 113,982 113,982 2 – – 113,982 2 (X) 128 128 2 – – 128 2 (X) 50,000 to 99,999 25,000 to 49,999 . . . . . . . . . . . . 66,718 2 9.9 66,582 66,582 2 – – 66,582 2 (X) 136 136 2 – – 136 2 (X) 25,000 to 49,999 10,000 to 24,999 . . . . . . . . . . . . 66,261 4 9.9 65,498 65,498 4 – – 65,498 4 (X) 763 763 4 – – 763 4 (X) 10,000 to 24,999

5,000 to 9,999 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27,013 4 4.0 26,955 26,955 4 – – 26,955 4 (X) 58 58 4 – – 58 4 (X) 5,000 to 9,999 2,500 to 4,999 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,281 3 1.5 9,983 9,983 3 – – 9,983 3 (X) 298 298 3 – – 298 3 (X) 2,500 to 4,999 2,000 to 2,499 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20,451 9 3.0 6,444 6,444 3 – – 6,444 3 (X) 14,007 14,007 9 13,248 6 759 3 (X) 2,000 to 2,499 1,500 to 1,999 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14,297 8 2.1 – – – – – – – (X) 14,297 14,297 8 14,297 8 – – (X) 1,500 to 1,999 1,000 to 1,499 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25,712 21 3.8 – – – – – – – (X) 25,712 25,712 21 25,712 21 – – (X) 1,000 to 1,499 500 to 999 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36,105 50 5.4 – – – – – – – (X) 36,105 36,105 50 36,105 50 – – (X) 500 to 999 200 to 499 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19,866 66 3.0 623 623 2 214 1 409 1 (X) 19,243 19,243 65 19,238 64 5 1 (X) 200 to 499 Less than 200 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17,761 231 2.6 132 132 3 73 1 59 2 (X) 17,629 17,629 230 17,559 228 70 2 (X) Less than 200

Cumulative summary: Cumulative summary:In place of— In place of— 1,000,000 or more . . . . . . . . . . . – – – – – – – – – – (X) – – – – – – – (X) 1,000,000 or more 500,000 or more . . . . . . . . . . . . . – – – – – – – – – – (X) – – – – – – – (X) 500,000 or more 250,000 or more . . . . . . . . . . . . . – – – – – – – – – – (X) – – – – – – – (X) 250,000 or more 100,000 or more . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105,549 1 15.7 105,426 105,426 1 – – 105,426 1 (X) 123 123 1 – – 123 1 (X) 100,000 or more 50,000 or more . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 219,659 3 32.7 219,408 219,408 3 – – 219,408 3 (X) 251 251 3 – – 251 3 (X) 50,000 or more 25,000 or more . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 286,377 5 42.6 285,990 285,990 5 – – 285,990 5 (X) 387 387 5 – – 387 5 (X) 25,000 or more 10,000 or more . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 352,638 9 52.4 351,488 351,488 9 – – 351,488 9 (X) 1,150 1,150 9 – – 1,150 9 (X) 10,000 or more

5,000 or more . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 379,651 13 56.5 378,443 378,443 13 – – 378,443 13 (X) 1,208 1,208 13 – – 1,208 13 (X) 5,000 or more 2,500 or more . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 389,932 16 58.0 388,426 388,426 16 – – 388,426 16 (X) 1,506 1,506 16 – – 1,506 16 (X) 2,500 or more 2,000 or more . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 410,383 25 61.0 394,870 394,870 19 – – 394,870 19 (X) 15,513 15,513 25 13,248 6 2,265 19 (X) 2,000 or more 1,500 or more . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 424,680 33 63.1 394,870 394,870 19 – – 394,870 19 (X) 29,810 29,810 33 27,545 14 2,265 19 (X) 1,500 or more 1,000 or more . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 450,392 54 67.0 394,870 394,870 19 – – 394,870 19 (X) 55,522 55,522 54 53,257 35 2,265 19 (X) 1,000 or more 500 or more . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 486,497 104 72.3 394,870 394,870 19 – – 394,870 19 (X) 91,627 91,627 104 89,362 85 2,265 19 (X) 500 or more 200 or more . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 506,363 170 75.3 395,493 395,493 21 214 1 395,279 20 (X) 110,870 110,870 169 108,600 149 2,270 20 (X) 200 or more


Table 4. Population and Housing Units: 1970 to 2010[For information concerning historical counts and geographic change, see “User Notes .” For information on confidentiality, nonsampling error, and definitions, see Appendixes]

StateCounty/County Equivalent

Population Housing units

2010 2000 1990 1980 1970 2010 2000 1990 1980 1970

North Dakota . . . . . . . . 672,591 642,200 638,800 652,717 617,792 317,498 r 289,678 276,340 258,772 204,235

Adams County . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,343 2,593 3,174 3,584 3,832 1,377 1,416 1,504 1,563 1,317Barnes County . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,066 11,775 12,545 13,960 14,669 5,704 5,599 5,801 5,976 5,302Benson County . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,660 6,964 7,198 7,944 8,245 2,950 2,932 3,163 3,084 2,718Billings County . . . . . . . . . . . . . 783 888 1,108 1,138 1,198 484 529 533 517 392Bottineau County . . . . . . . . . . . 6,429 7,149 8,011 9,239 9,496 4,341 4,409 4,661 4,679 4,009Bowman County . . . . . . . . . . . 3,151 3,242 3,596 4,229 3,901 1,683 1,596 1,691 1,722 1,365Burke County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,968 2,242 3,002 3,822 4,739 1,340 1,412 1,691 1,816 1,813Burleigh County . . . . . . . . . . . . 81,308 69,416 60,131 54,811 40,714 35,754 r 29,004 23,803 20,848 12,983Cass County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 149,778 123,138 102,874 88,247 73,653 67,938 53,790 42,407 35,215 24,278Cavalier County . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,993 4,831 6,064 7,636 8,213 2,309 2,725 3,038 3,123 2,932

Dickey County . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,289 5,757 6,107 7,207 6,976 2,636 2,656 2,763 2,838 2,471Divide County . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,071 2,283 2,899 3,494 4,564 1,324 1,469 1,667 1,783 1,667Dunn County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,536 3,600 4,005 4,627 4,895 2,132 1,965 2,057 1,849 1,605Eddy County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,385 2,757 2,951 3,554 4,103 1,323 1,418 1,470 1,541 1,477Emmons County . . . . . . . . . . . 3,550 4,331 4,830 5,877 7,200 2,085 2,168 2,200 2,322 2,167Foster County . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,343 3,759 3,983 4,611 4,832 1,801 1,793 1,876 1,827 1,649Golden Valley County . . . . . . . 1,680 1,924 2,108 2,391 2,611 967 973 1,035 1,033 915Grand Forks County . . . . . . . . 66,861 66,109 70,683 66,100 61,102 29,344 27,373 27,085 24,563 18,192Grant County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,394 2,841 3,549 4,274 5,009 1,690 1,722 2,011 1,969 1,649Griggs County . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,420 2,754 3,303 3,714 4,184 1,461 1,521 1,660 1,739 1,658

Hettinger County . . . . . . . . . . . 2,477 2,715 3,445 4,275 5,075 1,414 1,419 1,637 1,668 1,579Kidder County . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,435 2,753 3,332 3,833 4,362 1,674 1,610 1,672 1,740 1,505LaMoure County . . . . . . . . . . . 4,139 4,701 5,383 6,473 7,117 2,238 2,271 2,434 2,527 2,550Logan County . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,990 2,308 2,847 3,493 4,245 1,144 1,193 1,335 1,422 1,384McHenry County . . . . . . . . . . . 5,395 5,987 6,528 7,858 8,977 2,948 2,983 3,320 3,437 3,223McIntosh County . . . . . . . . . . . 2,809 3,390 4,021 4,800 5,545 1,858 1,853 2,031 2,197 1,982McKenzie County . . . . . . . . . . . 6,360 5,737 6,383 7,132 6,127 3,090 2,719 3,178 2,944 2,227McLean County . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,962 9,311 10,457 12,383 11,251 5,590 5,264 5,515 5,754 4,282Mercer County . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,424 8,644 9,808 9,404 6,175 4,450 4,402 4,496 3,978 2,253Morton County . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27,471 25,303 23,700 25,177 20,310 12,079 10,587 9,467 9,382 6,317

Mountrail County . . . . . . . . . . . 7,673 6,631 7,021 7,679 8,437 4,119 3,438 3,675 3,201 3,176Nelson County . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,126 3,715 4,410 5,233 5,807 1,927 2,014 2,261 2,442 2,214Oliver County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,846 2,065 2,381 2,495 2,322 905 903 968 960 753Pembina County . . . . . . . . . . . 7,413 8,585 9,238 10,399 10,728 3,859 4,115 4,294 4,438 3,894Pierce County . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,357 4,675 5,052 6,166 6,323 2,199 2,269 2,355 2,376 2,076Ramsey County . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,451 12,066 12,681 13,048 12,915 5,615 5,729 5,616 5,259 4,387Ransom County . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,457 5,890 5,921 6,698 7,102 2,656 2,604 2,569 2,712 2,602Renville County . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,470 2,610 3,160 3,608 3,828 1,386 1,413 1,558 1,530 1,395Richland County . . . . . . . . . . . 16,321 17,998 18,148 19,207 18,089 7,503 7,575 7,394 7,182 5,749Rolette County . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13,937 13,674 12,772 12,177 11,549 5,372 5,027 4,742 3,923 3,015

Sargent County . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,829 4,366 4,549 5,512 5,937 2,004 2,016 2,057 2,210 2,025Sheridan County . . . . . . . . . . . 1,321 1,710 2,148 2,819 3,232 894 924 1,061 1,180 1,202Sioux County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,153 4,044 3,761 3,620 3,632 1,311 1,216 1,175 1,062 943Slope County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 727 767 907 1,157 1,484 436 451 481 513 477Stark County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24,199 22,636 22,832 23,697 19,613 10,735 9,722 9,585 8,487 5,748Steele County . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,975 2,258 2,420 3,106 3,749 1,171 1,231 1,311 1,447 1,394Stutsman County . . . . . . . . . . . 21,100 21,908 22,241 24,154 23,550 9,862 9,817 9,770 9,663 7,741Towner County . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,246 2,876 3,627 4,052 4,645 1,449 1,558 1,770 1,692 1,684Traill County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,121 8,477 8,752 9,624 9,571 3,780 3,708 3,770 3,926 3,529Walsh County . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,119 12,389 13,840 15,371 16,251 5,498 5,757 6,093 6,153 5,307

Ward County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61,675 58,795 57,921 58,392 58,560 26,744 25,097 23,585 21,521 17,402Wells County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,207 5,102 5,864 6,979 7,847 2,481 2,643 2,869 2,886 2,881Williams County . . . . . . . . . . . . 22,398 19,761 21,129 22,237 19,301 10,464 9,680 10,180 8,953 6,780


Table 5. Population, Housing Units, Land Area, and Density: 2010; and Percent Change: 1980 to 2010[For information concerning historical counts and geographic change, see “User Notes .” For information on confidentiality, nonsampling error, and definitions, see Appendixes]


PopulationHousing

units

Land area in square

miles

Average per square mile of land Percent change

Population density

Housing unit

density


2000 to 2010

1990 to 2000

1980 to 1990

2000 to 2010

1990 to 2000

1980 to 1990

North Dakota . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 672,591 317,498 69,000 .80 9 .7 4 .6 4 .7 0 .5 –2 .1 9 .6 4 .8 6 .8

Adams County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,343 1,377 987 .62 2 .4 1 .4 –9 .6 –18 .3 –11 .4 –2 .8 –5 .9 –3 .8Barnes County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,066 5,704 1,491 .55 7 .4 3 .8 –6 .0 –6 .1 –10 .1 1 .9 –3 .5 –2 .9Benson County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,660 2,950 1,388 .71 4 .8 2 .1 –4 .4 –3 .3 –9 .4 0 .6 –7 .3 2 .6Billings County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 783 484 1,148 .85 0 .7 0 .4 –11 .8 –19 .9 –2 .6 –8 .5 –0 .8 3 .1Bottineau County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,429 4,341 1,668 .42 3 .9 2 .6 –10 .1 –10 .8 –13 .3 –1 .5 –5 .4 –0 .4Bowman County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,151 1,683 1,161 .81 2 .7 1 .4 –2 .8 –9 .8 –15 .0 5 .5 –5 .6 –1 .8Burke County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,968 1,340 1,103 .57 1 .8 1 .2 –12 .2 –25 .3 –21 .5 –5 .1 –16 .5 –6 .9Burleigh County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81,308 35,754 1,632 .65 49 .8 21 .9 17 .1 15 .4 9 .7 23 .3 21 .8 14 .2Cass County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 149,778 67,938 1,764 .94 84 .9 38 .5 21 .6 19 .7 16 .6 26 .3 26 .8 20 .4Cavalier County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,993 2,309 1,488 .75 2 .7 1 .6 –17 .3 –20 .3 –20 .6 –15 .3 –10 .3 –2 .7

Dickey County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,289 2,636 1,131 .47 4 .7 2 .3 –8 .1 –5 .7 –15 .3 –0 .8 –3 .9 –2 .6Divide County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,071 1,324 1,260 .79 1 .6 1 .1 –9 .3 –21 .2 –17 .0 –9 .9 –11 .9 –6 .5Dunn County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,536 2,132 2,008 .46 1 .8 1 .1 –1 .8 –10 .1 –13 .4 8 .5 –4 .5 11 .2Eddy County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,385 1,323 630 .17 3 .8 2 .1 –13 .5 –6 .6 –17 .0 –6 .7 –3 .5 –4 .6Emmons County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,550 2,085 1,510 .43 2 .4 1 .4 –18 .0 –10 .3 –17 .8 –3 .8 –1 .5 –5 .3Foster County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,343 1,801 635 .45 5 .3 2 .8 –11 .1 –5 .6 –13 .6 0 .4 –4 .4 2 .7Golden Valley County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,680 967 1,000 .79 1 .7 1 .0 –12 .7 –8 .7 –11 .8 –0 .6 –6 .0 0 .2Grand Forks County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66,861 29,344 1,436 .38 46 .5 20 .4 1 .1 –6 .5 6 .9 7 .2 1 .1 10 .3Grant County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,394 1,690 1,659 .14 1 .4 1 .0 –15 .7 –19 .9 –17 .0 –1 .9 –14 .4 2 .1Griggs County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,420 1,461 708 .81 3 .4 2 .1 –12 .1 –16 .6 –11 .1 –3 .9 –8 .4 –4 .5

Hettinger County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,477 1,414 1,132 .22 2 .2 1 .2 –8 .8 –21 .2 –19 .4 –0 .4 –13 .3 –1 .9Kidder County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,435 1,674 1,351 .19 1 .8 1 .2 –11 .6 –17 .4 –13 .1 4 .0 –3 .7 –3 .9LaMoure County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,139 2,238 1,145 .94 3 .6 2 .0 –12 .0 –12 .7 –16 .8 –1 .5 –6 .7 –3 .7Logan County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,990 1,144 992 .82 2 .0 1 .2 –13 .8 –18 .9 –18 .5 –4 .1 –10 .6 –6 .1McHenry County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,395 2,948 1,873 .95 2 .9 1 .6 –9 .9 –8 .3 –16 .9 –1 .2 –10 .2 –3 .4McIntosh County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,809 1,858 974 .73 2 .9 1 .9 –17 .1 –15 .7 –16 .2 0 .3 –8 .8 –7 .6McKenzie County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,360 3,090 2,760 .32 2 .3 1 .1 10 .9 –10 .1 –10 .5 13 .6 –14 .4 7 .9McLean County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,962 5,590 2,110 .88 4 .2 2 .6 –3 .7 –11 .0 –15 .6 6 .2 –4 .6 –4 .2Mercer County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,424 4,450 1,042 .96 8 .1 4 .3 –2 .5 –11 .9 4 .3 1 .1 –2 .1 13 .0Morton County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27,471 12,079 1,926 .27 14 .3 6 .3 8 .6 6 .8 –5 .9 14 .1 11 .8 0 .9

Mountrail County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,673 4,119 1,825 .30 4 .2 2 .3 15 .7 –5 .6 –8 .6 19 .8 –6 .4 14 .8Nelson County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,126 1,927 981 .77 3 .2 2 .0 –15 .9 –15 .8 –15 .7 –4 .3 –10 .9 –7 .4Oliver County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,846 905 722 .51 2 .6 1 .3 –10 .6 –13 .3 –4 .6 0 .2 –6 .7 0 .8Pembina County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,413 3,859 1,118 .69 6 .6 3 .4 –13 .7 –7 .1 –11 .2 –6 .2 –4 .2 –3 .2Pierce County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,357 2,199 1,018 .60 4 .3 2 .2 –6 .8 –7 .5 –18 .1 –3 .1 –3 .7 –0 .9Ramsey County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,451 5,615 1,186 .85 9 .6 4 .7 –5 .1 –4 .8 –2 .8 –2 .0 2 .0 6 .8Ransom County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,457 2,656 862 .36 6 .3 3 .1 –7 .4 –0 .5 –11 .6 2 .0 1 .4 –5 .3Renville County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,470 1,386 877 .05 2 .8 1 .6 –5 .4 –17 .4 –12 .4 –1 .9 –9 .3 1 .8Richland County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16,321 7,503 1,435 .78 11 .4 5 .2 –9 .3 –0 .8 –5 .5 –1 .0 2 .4 3 .0Rolette County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13,937 5,372 903 .08 15 .4 5 .9 1 .9 7 .1 4 .9 6 .9 6 .0 20 .9

Sargent County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,829 2,004 858 .51 4 .5 2 .3 –12 .3 –4 .0 –17 .5 –0 .6 –2 .0 –6 .9Sheridan County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,321 894 972 .38 1 .4 0 .9 –22 .7 –20 .4 –23 .8 –3 .2 –12 .9 –10 .1Sioux County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,153 1,311 1,094 .09 3 .8 1 .2 2 .7 7 .5 3 .9 7 .8 3 .5 10 .6Slope County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 727 436 1,214 .92 0 .6 0 .4 –5 .2 –15 .4 –21 .6 –3 .3 –6 .2 –6 .2Stark County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24,199 10,735 1,334 .74 18 .1 8 .0 6 .9 –0 .9 –3 .7 10 .4 1 .4 12 .9Steele County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,975 1,171 712 .22 2 .8 1 .6 –12 .5 –6 .7 –22 .1 –4 .9 –6 .1 –9 .4Stutsman County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21,100 9,862 2,221 .72 9 .5 4 .4 –3 .7 –1 .5 –7 .9 0 .5 0 .5 1 .1Towner County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,246 1,449 1,024 .56 2 .2 1 .4 –21 .9 –20 .7 –10 .5 –7 .0 –12 .0 4 .6Traill County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,121 3,780 861 .95 9 .4 4 .4 –4 .2 –3 .1 –9 .1 1 .9 –1 .6 –4 .0Walsh County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,119 5,498 1,281 .93 8 .7 4 .3 –10 .3 –10 .5 –10 .0 –4 .5 –5 .5 –1 .0

Ward County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61,675 26,744 2,013 .28 30 .6 13 .3 4 .9 1 .5 –0 .8 6 .6 6 .4 9 .6Wells County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,207 2,481 1,271 .05 3 .3 2 .0 –17 .5 –13 .0 –16 .0 –6 .1 –7 .9 –0 .6Williams County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22,398 10,464 2,077 .40 10 .8 5 .0 13 .3 –6 .5 –5 .0 8 .1 –4 .9 13 .7


Table 6. Rank of Counties by Percent Change in Population: 2000 to 2010 [For information concerning historical counts and geographic change, see “User Notes .”information on confidentiality, nonsampling error, and definitions, see Appendixes]

For

County/County EquivalentPopulation Percent change

2010 2000 Rank Percent

Cass County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 149,778 123,138 1 21 .6Burleigh County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81,308 69,416 2 17 .1Mountrail County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,673 6,631 3 15 .7Williams County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22,398 19,761 4 13 .3McKenzie County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,360 5,737 5 10 .9Morton County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27,471 25,303 6 8 .6Stark County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24,199 22,636 7 6 .9Ward County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61,675 58,795 8 4 .9Sioux County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,153 4,044 9 2 .7Rolette County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13,937 13,674 10 1 .9

Grand Forks County . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66,861 66,109 11 1 .1Dunn County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,536 3,600 12 –1 .8Mercer County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,424 8,644 13 –2 .5Bowman County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,151 3,242 14 –2 .8Stutsman County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21,100 21,908 15 –3 .7McLean County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,962 9,311 16 –3 .7Traill County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,121 8,477 17 –4 .2Benson County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,660 6,964 18 –4 .4Ramsey County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,451 12,066 19 –5 .1Slope County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 727 767 20 –5 .2

Renville County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,470 2,610 21 –5 .4Barnes County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,066 11,775 22 –6 .0Pierce County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,357 4,675 23 –6 .8Ransom County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,457 5,890 24 –7 .4Dickey County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,289 5,757 25 –8 .1Hettinger County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,477 2,715 26 –8 .8Divide County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,071 2,283 27 –9 .3Richland County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16,321 17,998 28 –9 .3Adams County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,343 2,593 29 –9 .6McHenry County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,395 5,987 30 –9 .9

Bottineau County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,429 7,149 31 –10 .1Walsh County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,119 12,389 32 –10 .3Oliver County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,846 2,065 33 –10 .6Foster County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,343 3,759 34 –11 .1Kidder County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,435 2,753 35 –11 .6Billings County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 783 888 36 –11 .8LaMoure County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,139 4,701 37 –12 .0Griggs County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,420 2,754 38 –12 .1Burke County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,968 2,242 39 –12 .2Sargent County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,829 4,366 40 –12 .3

Steele County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,975 2,258 41 –12 .5Golden Valley County . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,680 1,924 42 –12 .7Eddy County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,385 2,757 43 –13 .5Pembina County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,413 8,585 44 –13 .7Logan County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,990 2,308 45 –13 .8Grant County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,394 2,841 46 –15 .7Nelson County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,126 3,715 47 –15 .9McIntosh County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,809 3,390 48 –17 .1Cavalier County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,993 4,831 49 –17 .3Wells County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,207 5,102 50 –17 .5

Emmons County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,550 4,331 51 –18 .0Towner County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,246 2,876 52 –21 .9Sheridan County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,321 1,710 53 –22 .7


Table 7. Population by Urban and Rural: 2010[For information on confidentiality, nonsampling error, and definitions, see Appendixes]


Total population

Urban Rural Percent of total population

TotalIn urbanized

areaIn urban

cluster Total In place Not in place Urban Rural

North Dakota . . . . . . . . . . . . 672,591 402,872 269,056 133,816 269,719 128,499 141,220 59 .9 40 .1

Adams County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,343 – – – 2,343 1,438 905 – 100 .0Barnes County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,066 6,689 – 6,689 4,377 1,148 3,229 60 .4 39 .6Benson County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,660 – – – 6,660 2,629 4,031 – 100 .0Billings County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 783 – – – 783 112 671 – 100 .0Bottineau County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,429 – – – 6,429 3,441 2,988 – 100 .0Bowman County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,151 – – – 3,151 2,116 1,035 – 100 .0Burke County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,968 – – – 1,968 1,108 860 – 100 .0Burleigh County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81,308 66,227 63,235 2,992 15,081 685 14,396 81 .5 18 .5Cass County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 149,778 134,149 134,149 – 15,629 9,119 6,510 89 .6 10 .4Cavalier County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,993 – – – 3,993 2,493 1,500 – 100 .0

Dickey County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,289 – – – 5,289 3,416 1,873 – 100 .0Divide County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,071 – – – 2,071 1,239 832 – 100 .0Dunn County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,536 – – – 3,536 1,246 2,290 – 100 .0Eddy County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,385 – – – 2,385 1,595 790 – 100 .0Emmons County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,550 – – – 3,550 1,833 1,717 – 100 .0Foster County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,343 – – – 3,343 2,275 1,068 – 100 .0Golden Valley County . . . . . . . . . . . 1,680 – – – 1,680 1,136 544 – 100 .0Grand Forks County . . . . . . . . . . . . 66,861 55,649 52,952 2,697 11,212 4,170 7,042 83 .2 16 .8Grant County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,394 – – – 2,394 1,199 1,195 – 100 .0Griggs County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,420 – – – 2,420 1,340 1,080 – 100 .0

Hettinger County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,477 – – – 2,477 1,481 996 – 100 .0Kidder County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,435 – – – 2,435 1,160 1,275 – 100 .0LaMoure County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,139 – – – 4,139 2,172 1,967 – 100 .0Logan County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,990 – – – 1,990 1,162 828 – 100 .0McHenry County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,395 – – – 5,395 2,770 2,625 – 100 .0McIntosh County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,809 – – – 2,809 1,913 896 – 100 .0McKenzie County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,360 – – – 6,360 3,271 3,089 – 100 .0McLean County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,962 – – – 8,962 5,794 3,168 – 100 .0Mercer County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,424 2,949 – 2,949 5,475 3,497 1,978 35 .0 65 .0Morton County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27,471 18,720 18,720 – 8,751 3,068 5,683 68 .1 31 .9

Mountrail County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,673 – – – 7,673 4,708 2,965 – 100 .0Nelson County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,126 – – – 3,126 1,983 1,143 – 100 .0Oliver County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,846 – – – 1,846 571 1,275 – 100 .0Pembina County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,413 – – – 7,413 4,795 2,618 – 100 .0Pierce County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,357 2,824 – 2,824 1,533 244 1,289 64 .8 35 .2Ramsey County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,451 7,444 – 7,444 4,007 610 3,397 65 .0 35 .0Ransom County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,457 – – – 5,457 3,321 2,136 – 100 .0Renville County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,470 – – – 2,470 1,468 1,002 – 100 .0Richland County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16,321 7,834 – 7,834 8,487 3,600 4,887 48 .0 52 .0Rolette County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13,937 – – – 13,937 7,358 6,579 – 100 .0

Sargent County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,829 – – – 3,829 2,300 1,529 – 100 .0Sheridan County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,321 – – – 1,321 576 745 – 100 .0Sioux County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,153 – – – 4,153 1,448 2,705 – 100 .0Slope County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 727 – – – 727 156 571 – 100 .0Stark County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24,199 17,586 – 17,586 6,613 2,344 4,269 72 .7 27 .3Steele County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,975 – – – 1,975 830 1,145 – 100 .0Stutsman County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21,100 15,284 – 15,284 5,816 1,565 4,251 72 .4 27 .6Towner County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,246 – – – 2,246 1,395 851 – 100 .0Traill County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,121 – – – 8,121 5,592 2,529 – 100 .0Walsh County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,119 4,219 – 4,219 6,900 3,386 3,514 37 .9 62 .1

Ward County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61,675 48,171 – 48,171 13,504 5,108 8,396 78 .1 21 .9Wells County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,207 – – – 4,207 2,685 1,522 – 100 .0Williams County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22,398 15,127 – 15,127 7,271 2,430 4,841 67 .5 32 .5


Table 8. Population and Housing Units: 1990 to 2010; and Area Measurements and Density: 2010[For information concerning historical counts and geographic change, see “User Notes .” For information on confidentiality, nonsampling error, and definitions, see Appendixes]

StateCounty/County EquivalentCounty SubdivisionPlace

Population Housing units Area measurements in square miles

Average per square mile of land

2010 2000 1990 2010 2000 1990 Total area Land areaPopulation

densityHousing unit

density

North Dakota . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 672,591 642,200 638,800 317,498 r 289,678 276,340 70,698 .32 69,000 .80 9 .7 4 .6

Adams County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,343 2,593 3,174 1,377 1,416 1,504 988 .71 987 .62 2 .4 1 .4 Beisigl township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 25 25 11 13 10 36 .06 36 .04 0 .6 0 .3 Bucyrus city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 26 22 17 16 14 0 .35 0 .35 77 .1 48 .6 Bucyrus township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 40 36 19 19 20 35 .58 35 .58 0 .8 0 .5 Cedar township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 21 21 12 10 10 31 .65 31 .65 0 .8 0 .4 Central Adams UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54 64 95 37 35 40 71 .94 71 .92 0 .8 0 .5 Chandler township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 9 29 9 9 12 36 .03 36 .01 0 .4 0 .2 Clermont township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 25 32 17 14 15 35 .93 35 .89 1 .0 0 .5 Darling Springs township . . . . . . . . . 22 32 31 14 16 18 31 .08 31 .08 0 .7 0 .5 Duck Creek township . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 33 41 11 11 13 35 .93 35 .93 0 .7 0 .3 East Adams UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 161 192 146 97 102 70 215 .73 215 .61 0 .7 0 .4 Gilstrap township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 28 36 11 11 12 35 .94 35 .93 0 .6 0 .3 Haynes city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 19 37 16 15 16 0 .14 0 .14 164 .3 114 .3 Hettinger city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,226 1,307 1,574 704 720 769 0 .86 0 .85 1,442 .4 828 .2 Hettinger township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 195 198 218 108 100 102 35 .10 34 .89 5 .6 3 .1 Holden UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 32 (X) 18 15 (X) 35 .94 35 .94 0 .6 0 .5 Lightning Creek township . . . . . . . . . 14 24 22 9 10 14 36 .06 36 .06 0 .4 0 .2 Maine township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 18 32 12 13 12 31 .73 31 .73 0 .7 0 .4 Orange township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 26 40 15 17 20 35 .94 35 .80 0 .6 0 .4 Reeder city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 162 181 252 114 130 136 0 .62 0 .62 261 .3 183 .9 Reeder township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 38 51 23 22 27 35 .23 35 .07 1 .1 0 .7 Scott township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 106 124 150 49 50 54 36 .05 35 .84 3 .0 1 .4 South Fork township . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 23 17 8 11 10 36 .05 36 .05 0 .3 0 .2 Taylor Butte township . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 19 34 9 12 13 35 .90 35 .89 0 .4 0 .3 West Adams UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 (X) (X) 20 (X) (X) 66 .95 66 .88 0 .5 0 .3 Wolf Butte township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 39 52 17 21 20 35 .95 35 .89 0 .7 0 .5

Barnes County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,066 11,775 12,545 5,704 5,599 5,801 1,513 .40 1,491 .55 7 .4 3 .8 Alta township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 108 98 107 45 43 45 36 .20 36 .19 3 .0 1 .2 Anderson township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52 56 64 23 23 31 36 .15 35 .81 1 .5 0 .6 Ashtabula township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 112 93 119 179 145 159 36 .18 32 .77 3 .4 5 .5 Baldwin township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 34 39 20 19 23 36 .26 35 .48 0 .9 0 .6 Binghampton township . . . . . . . . . . . 76 100 113 39 39 45 35 .62 35 .54 2 .1 1 .1 Brimer township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59 66 70 23 28 29 35 .98 35 .52 1 .7 0 .6 Cuba township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 76 89 85 32 33 35 35 .74 35 .71 2 .1 0 .9 Dazey city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 104 91 129 56 47 52 0 .38 0 .38 273 .7 147 .4 Dazey township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51 59 72 22 21 29 35 .39 35 .00 1 .5 0 .6 Eckelson township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 111 95 100 54 50 54 36 .30 34 .92 3 .2 1 .5 Edna township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 76 74 95 30 32 37 35 .79 34 .44 2 .2 0 .9 Ellsbury township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 28 59 15 14 23 35 .94 35 .94 0 .8 0 .4 Fingal city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 97 133 138 57 62 69 0 .42 0 .42 231 .0 135 .7 Getchell township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73 68 81 49 33 42 35 .82 34 .78 2 .1 1 .4 Grand Prairie township . . . . . . . . . . 48 49 43 24 21 23 36 .19 36 .19 1 .3 0 .7 Green township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84 97 88 38 40 44 35 .81 35 .35 2 .4 1 .1 Greenland township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 52 75 25 25 31 36 .17 36 .17 1 .2 0 .7 Hemen township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 38 50 14 14 22 36 .09 35 .16 0 .8 0 .4 Hobart township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 111 149 137 55 61 55 36 .06 34 .38 3 .2 1 .6 Kathryn city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52 63 72 37 43 46 0 .59 0 .59 88 .1 62 .7 Lake Town township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 40 56 20 23 29 35 .55 34 .55 1 .1 0 .6 Leal city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 36 35 11 12 16 0 .14 0 .14 142 .9 78 .6 Litchville city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 172 191 205 98 110 125 1 .48 1 .48 116 .2 66 .2 Mansfield township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 41 38 15 17 23 36 .27 35 .73 1 .1 0 .4 Marsh township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 283 229 246 102 85 85 35 .96 35 .91 7 .9 2 .8 Meadow Lake township . . . . . . . . . . 81 93 95 29 32 36 36 .37 36 .11 2 .2 0 .8 Minnie Lake township . . . . . . . . . . . 50 63 75 26 26 32 36 .14 36 .13 1 .4 0 .7 Nelson township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57 61 79 29 29 30 36 .02 35 .98 1 .6 0 .8 Noltimier township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65 89 91 34 37 38 36 .07 35 .96 1 .8 0 .9 Nome city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62 70 82 35 38 43 0 .41 0 .41 151 .2 85 .4 Norma township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 54 58 24 27 27 35 .96 35 .67 1 .0 0 .7 Oakhill township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51 79 95 31 32 42 35 .50 35 .41 1 .4 0 .9 Oriska city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 118 128 103 63 57 48 0 .28 0 .28 421 .4 225 .0 Oriska township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65 72 128 30 30 48 35 .17 35 .08 1 .9 0 .9 Pierce township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74 91 79 28 32 34 35 .34 35 .17 2 .1 0 .8 Pillsbury city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 24 31 12 11 18 0 .26 0 .26 46 .2 46 .2 Potter township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 41 90 23 23 40 35 .56 32 .77 1 .0 0 .7 Raritan township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95 108 124 48 46 49 35 .99 35 .97 2 .6 1 .3 Rogers city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 61 69 28 29 33 0 .98 0 .98 46 .9 28 .6


Table 8. Population and Housing Units: 1990 to 2010; and Area Measurements and Density: 2010—Con.[For information concerning historical counts and geographic change, see “User Notes .” For information on confidentiality, nonsampling error, and definitions, see Appendixes]





densityHousing unit

density

North Dakota—Con .

Barnes County—Con . Rogers township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 42 44 17 21 27 34 .92 34 .73 1 .2 0 .5 Rosebud township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55 68 65 30 30 31 35 .01 34 .93 1 .6 0 .9 Sanborn city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 192 194 164 80 80 80 0 .55 0 .55 349 .1 145 .5 Sibley city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 46 41 50 59 53 0 .04 0 .04 750 .0 1,250 .0 Sibley Trail township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92 85 78 113 85 82 36 .16 33 .96 2 .7 3 .3 Skandia township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 54 67 25 26 29 35 .89 35 .17 1 .1 0 .7 Spring Creek township . . . . . . . . . . . 74 85 84 46 48 47 35 .52 35 .49 2 .1 1 .3 Springvale township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53 60 82 23 24 30 35 .90 35 .90 1 .5 0 .6 Stewart township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89 124 88 44 44 42 36 .14 36 .14 2 .5 1 .2 Svea township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 43 67 25 23 33 35 .88 35 .88 1 .1 0 .7 Thordenskjold township . . . . . . . . . . 67 79 95 30 40 43 35 .63 35 .62 1 .9 0 .8 Tower City city (part) . . . . . . . . . . . . – – – 1 1 2 0 .62 0 .62 – 1 .6 Uxbridge township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89 111 106 37 34 44 35 .92 35 .13 2 .5 1 .1 Valley township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 536 565 539 210 195 179 32 .68 32 .65 16 .4 6 .4 Valley City city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,585 6,826 7,163 3,307 3,250 3,222 3 .46 3 .46 1,903 .2 955 .8 Weimer township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47 53 72 24 24 27 36 .03 36 .03 1 .3 0 .7 Wimbledon city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 216 237 275 119 126 140 0 .53 0 .53 407 .5 224 .5

Benson County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,660 6,964 7,198 2,950 2,932 3,163 1,439 .50 1,388 .71 4 .8 2 .1 Albert township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51 61 81 29 28 36 35 .91 35 .57 1 .4 0 .8 Arne township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 51 57 24 27 32 35 .89 35 .38 1 .2 0 .7 Aurora township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 28 35 18 17 24 36 .03 35 .80 0 .9 0 .5 Beaver township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 39 35 16 16 17 35 .79 32 .93 0 .8 0 .5 Brinsmade city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 29 21 20 24 17 0 .23 0 .23 152 .2 87 .0 Broe township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 43 55 22 25 32 36 .04 35 .50 1 .0 0 .6 Butte Valley township . . . . . . . . . . . . 55 87 113 37 42 55 35 .95 35 .31 1 .6 1 .0 East Fork township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 36 49 15 17 19 35 .95 35 .91 1 .0 0 .4 Eldon township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 53 70 23 27 32 36 .07 35 .99 1 .0 0 .6 Esmond city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100 159 196 106 114 126 0 .46 0 .46 217 .4 230 .4 Esmond township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 50 73 24 27 35 35 .61 34 .76 1 .1 0 .7 Fort Totten UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,638 1,614 1,359 425 421 431 35 .12 32 .30 50 .7 13 .2 Fort Totten CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,243 952 867 295 255 241 8 .84 8 .60 144 .5 34 .3 Hesper township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56 83 86 31 38 41 36 .09 35 .39 1 .6 0 .9 Impark township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 40 65 20 30 37 36 .00 31 .68 0 .9 0 .6 Iowa township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 33 30 10 10 9 35 .89 33 .57 0 .7 0 .3 Irvine township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 24 43 12 14 28 36 .60 35 .89 0 .4 0 .3 Isabel township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 70 40 33 33 40 36 .10 35 .50 1 .3 0 .9 Knox city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 59 45 26 28 25 0 .50 0 .50 50 .0 52 .0 Knox township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 36 55 15 16 22 36 .39 35 .79 0 .8 0 .4 Lake Ibsen township . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 39 35 14 18 23 35 .91 33 .65 0 .7 0 .4 Lallie township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 453 364 295 119 106 91 54 .41 48 .97 9 .3 2 .4 Lallie North UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 20 16 15 7 9 28 .53 24 .60 1 .6 0 .6 Leeds city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 427 464 542 266 282 302 0 .45 0 .45 948 .9 591 .1 Leeds township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91 83 86 40 38 41 36 .36 35 .70 2 .5 1 .1 Lohnes township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 14 26 71 12 18 21 .71 19 .96 1 .8 3 .6 McClellan township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 34 69 21 24 28 35 .96 35 .82 1 .3 0 .6 Maddock city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 382 498 559 253 276 298 0 .89 0 .89 429 .2 284 .3 Minco township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 22 44 15 11 16 29 .01 28 .55 0 .7 0 .5 Minnewaukan city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 224 318 401 178 199 203 0 .27 0 .27 829 .6 659 .3 Mission township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,087 1,077 1,044 321 300 300 44 .76 39 .96 27 .2 8 .0 Normania township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 56 63 22 25 31 35 .89 34 .40 1 .3 0 .6 North Viking township . . . . . . . . . . . 59 70 82 32 32 37 35 .16 35 .01 1 .7 0 .9 Oberon city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105 81 103 58 46 64 0 .34 0 .34 308 .8 170 .6 Oberon township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67 91 87 41 42 42 57 .91 57 .39 1 .2 0 .7 Pleasant Lake township . . . . . . . . . . 74 80 73 31 30 30 36 .58 34 .05 2 .2 0 .9 Rich Valley township . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 46 59 19 27 26 36 .06 35 .98 1 .1 0 .5 Riggin township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47 63 78 23 27 39 47 .87 46 .59 1 .0 0 .5 Rock township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 39 55 17 17 24 36 .44 36 .12 0 .8 0 .5 South Viking township . . . . . . . . . . . 61 69 74 27 32 35 35 .83 35 .60 1 .7 0 .8 Twin Lake township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 43 63 23 25 23 35 .98 33 .87 1 .2 0 .7 Twin Tree township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 143 50 66 51 19 22 36 .55 36 .34 3 .9 1 .4 Warwick city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65 75 80 32 47 49 1 .00 0 .65 100 .0 49 .2 Warwick township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64 78 45 22 23 35 35 .06 32 .96 1 .9 0 .7 West Antelope township . . . . . . . . . . 21 33 44 16 17 21 35 .91 35 .80 0 .6 0 .4 West Bay township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57 60 83 30 31 34 35 .50 35 .29 1 .6 0 .9 Wood Lake township . . . . . . . . . . . . 522 440 391 242 207 206 36 .01 34 .79 15 .0 7 .0 York city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 26 35 23 32 35 0 .23 0 .23 100 .0 100 .0 York township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 36 39 22 26 23 36 .30 36 .03 0 .7 0 .6







densityHousing unit

density


Billings County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 783 888 1,108 484 529 533 1,153 .48 1,148 .85 0 .7 0 .4 Medora city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 112 100 101 102 117 77 0 .37 0 .36 311 .1 283 .3 North Billings UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 467 545 729 252 267 291 809 .00 806 .15 0 .6 0 .3 South Billings UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 204 243 278 130 145 165 344 .10 342 .35 0 .6 0 .4

Bottineau County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,429 7,149 8,011 4,341 4,409 4,661 1,697 .35 1,668 .42 3 .9 2 .6 Amity township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 35 47 19 19 22 36 .09 36 .00 0 .9 0 .5 Antler city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 47 74 29 44 55 0 .16 0 .16 168 .8 181 .3 Antler township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56 78 83 37 43 41 43 .58 43 .56 1 .3 0 .8 Bentinck township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 32 52 14 17 25 35 .96 35 .71 0 .7 0 .4 Blaine township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 30 37 11 11 14 35 .91 35 .89 0 .7 0 .3 Bottineau city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,211 2,336 2,598 1,085 1,114 1,164 1 .09 1 .09 2,028 .4 995 .4 Brander township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54 60 53 22 21 30 35 .99 35 .73 1 .5 0 .6 Cecil township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 28 36 14 15 19 35 .41 35 .25 0 .5 0 .4 Chatfield township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 45 61 22 22 27 35 .94 35 .88 1 .2 0 .6 Cordelia township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96 119 110 48 48 48 35 .75 34 .60 2 .8 1 .4 Cut Bank township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 56 81 23 32 35 35 .93 35 .90 1 .0 0 .6 Dalen township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 114 111 131 58 59 83 43 .84 42 .82 2 .7 1 .4 Eidsvold township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 38 63 28 37 46 59 .56 58 .66 0 .6 0 .5 Elms township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57 54 58 25 22 27 35 .96 35 .95 1 .6 0 .7 Elysian township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 37 62 18 20 27 35 .85 35 .78 0 .9 0 .5 Gardena city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 38 41 21 21 28 0 .32 0 .32 90 .6 65 .6 Haram township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72 85 92 38 44 42 43 .61 43 .55 1 .7 0 .9 Hastings township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47 55 74 24 31 38 35 .86 35 .80 1 .3 0 .7 Hoffman township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 19 14 8 8 7 35 .85 35 .72 0 .5 0 .2 Homen township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 118 122 129 152 112 126 44 .52 38 .71 3 .0 3 .9 Kane township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57 71 92 31 35 36 32 .84 31 .55 1 .8 1 .0 Kramer city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 44 51 41 43 46 0 .15 0 .15 193 .3 273 .3 Landa city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 28 38 22 28 29 0 .08 0 .08 475 .0 275 .0 Lansford city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 245 253 249 128 131 130 0 .35 0 .35 700 .0 365 .7 Lansford township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73 63 65 28 28 28 35 .54 35 .51 2 .1 0 .8 Lewis township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 39 45 15 19 21 35 .95 35 .95 0 .9 0 .4 Lordsburg township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 22 32 12 12 19 36 .17 35 .34 0 .5 0 .3 Maxbass city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84 91 123 61 70 77 0 .17 0 .17 494 .1 358 .8 Mount Rose township . . . . . . . . . . . 59 64 65 29 28 27 36 .01 36 .01 1 .6 0 .8 Newborg township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 30 54 20 12 25 35 .98 35 .58 1 .2 0 .6 Newburg city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 110 88 104 62 64 66 0 .13 0 .13 846 .2 476 .9 Oak Creek township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 26 41 16 22 23 35 .44 35 .44 0 .7 0 .5 Oak Valley township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52 62 62 29 30 32 36 .10 36 .02 1 .4 0 .8 Ostby township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 65 73 28 31 32 35 .48 35 .45 1 .3 0 .8 Overly city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 19 25 11 10 13 0 .36 0 .36 50 .0 30 .6 Peabody township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 16 12 8 8 10 36 .05 35 .60 0 .5 0 .2 Pickering township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 193 213 218 84 89 89 35 .57 35 .56 5 .4 2 .4 Renville township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 32 36 16 18 24 35 .96 35 .89 0 .9 0 .4 Richburg township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 49 98 25 29 36 45 .39 43 .32 0 .9 0 .6 Roland township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 538 545 426 1,075 1,007 961 43 .94 38 .12 14 .1 28 .2 Scandia township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 54 88 39 44 48 43 .86 43 .86 1 .0 0 .9 Scotia township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 64 89 32 39 42 41 .32 40 .18 1 .2 0 .8 Sergius township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51 79 91 33 38 38 48 .75 47 .76 1 .1 0 .7 Sherman township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68 69 76 31 33 35 35 .92 35 .91 1 .9 0 .9 Souris city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58 83 97 45 46 57 0 .10 0 .10 580 .0 450 .0 Starbuck township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 38 29 21 19 22 40 .49 39 .25 0 .8 0 .5 Stone Creek township . . . . . . . . . . . 19 28 32 16 15 17 28 .25 27 .84 0 .7 0 .6 Tacoma township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61 94 93 42 40 40 42 .03 39 .39 1 .5 1 .1 Wayne township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 27 36 16 15 18 43 .81 43 .52 0 .7 0 .4 Wellington township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 58 53 23 24 24 36 .07 35 .99 0 .8 0 .6 Westhope city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 429 533 578 218 268 246 0 .33 0 .33 1,300 .0 660 .6 Wheaton township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56 58 65 24 36 36 43 .63 43 .37 1 .3 0 .6 Whitby township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 17 27 7 8 10 36 .27 36 .27 0 .2 0 .2 Whitteron township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 405 447 511 219 169 203 35 .13 34 .66 11 .7 6 .3 Willow City city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 163 221 281 123 143 172 0 .45 0 .45 362 .2 273 .3 Willow Vale township . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 34 46 15 18 21 36 .11 35 .90 0 .7 0 .4

Bowman County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,151 3,242 3,596 1,683 1,596 1,691 1,167 .05 1,161 .81 2 .7 1 .4 Adelaide township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 31 37 14 12 12 35 .70 35 .67 0 .8 0 .4 Amor township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 23 28 11 12 17 35 .88 35 .85 0 .4 0 .3 Bowman city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,650 1,600 1,741 867 799 837 1 .53 1 .53 1,078 .4 566 .7







densityHousing unit

density


Bowman County—Con . Bowman township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 257 269 278 119 107 109 34 .32 34 .24 7 .5 3 .5 Boyesen township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 20 42 9 9 14 35 .93 35 .82 0 .6 0 .3 Buena Vista township . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 31 39 12 13 16 30 .57 30 .57 0 .7 0 .4 Fischbein township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 20 27 12 14 18 35 .41 35 .11 0 .4 0 .3 Gascoyne city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 23 22 10 15 12 1 .00 1 .00 16 .0 10 .0 Gascoyne township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 20 25 12 16 12 35 .54 35 .48 0 .4 0 .3 Gem township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 19 27 12 8 9 35 .94 35 .85 0 .6 0 .3 Goldfield township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 31 42 26 25 21 36 .02 36 .01 1 .0 0 .7 Grainbelt township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 50 42 15 18 17 30 .58 30 .57 0 .8 0 .5 Grand River township . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 27 36 8 7 11 35 .93 35 .92 0 .3 0 .2 Haley township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 23 28 24 19 21 36 .01 35 .97 0 .6 0 .7 Hart UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 27 18 11 11 13 35 .88 35 .85 0 .7 0 .3 Ladd township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 26 34 11 11 12 36 .03 36 .03 0 .4 0 .3 Langberg township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 16 42 9 8 15 35 .90 35 .84 0 .4 0 .3 Marion township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 21 15 11 11 7 30 .72 30 .53 0 .6 0 .4 Minnehaha township . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 22 30 12 9 15 36 .01 32 .90 0 .7 0 .4 Nebo township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 40 44 17 18 17 35 .88 35 .86 0 .7 0 .5 Rhame city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 169 189 186 107 117 105 1 .50 1 .50 112 .7 71 .3 Rhame township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 32 43 14 13 19 29 .17 29 .06 0 .9 0 .5 Scranton city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 281 304 294 147 139 155 0 .90 0 .90 312 .2 163 .3 Scranton township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67 73 130 34 36 52 35 .01 34 .92 1 .9 1 .0 Star township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 38 43 17 15 17 30 .61 30 .50 1 .6 0 .6 Stillwater township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 32 38 14 15 17 30 .60 30 .59 0 .9 0 .5 Sunny Slope township . . . . . . . . . . . 9 10 8 6 7 6 51 .23 51 .12 0 .2 0 .1 Talbot township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 104 80 98 45 38 40 35 .85 35 .82 2 .9 1 .3 West Bowman UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 104 106 107 57 54 50 285 .45 284 .93 0 .4 0 .2 Whiting township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 39 52 20 20 25 35 .94 35 .87 0 .9 0 .6

Burke County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,968 2,242 3,002 1,340 1,412 1,691 1,128 .92 1,103 .57 1 .8 1 .2 Battleview township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80 88 138 51 48 51 35 .88 35 .58 2 .2 1 .4 Bowbells city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 336 406 498 223 214 258 0 .80 0 .80 420 .0 278 .8 Bowbells township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 43 57 22 22 29 35 .46 35 .11 1 .2 0 .6 Carter township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 14 20 11 9 14 35 .92 35 .12 0 .4 0 .3 Clayton township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 33 34 14 15 15 36 .06 35 .44 1 .0 0 .4 Cleary township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 42 47 17 16 21 35 .97 35 .30 1 .0 0 .5 Columbus city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 133 151 223 130 142 160 0 .27 0 .27 492 .6 481 .5 Colville township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65 70 59 35 32 38 34 .62 33 .26 2 .0 1 .1 Dale township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 30 37 17 19 27 36 .08 35 .47 0 .8 0 .5 Dimond township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 15 29 9 8 17 35 .70 32 .83 0 .5 0 .3 Fay township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 26 43 14 17 20 35 .89 35 .85 0 .6 0 .4 Flaxton city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66 73 121 69 77 99 0 .28 0 .28 235 .7 246 .4 Foothills township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 27 58 19 21 24 35 .98 35 .18 0 .6 0 .5 Forthun township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 11 21 12 13 17 43 .28 43 .22 0 .3 0 .3 Garness township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 69 75 27 29 34 35 .97 35 .73 1 .1 0 .8 Harmonious township . . . . . . . . . . . 20 24 39 20 18 21 36 .03 35 .49 0 .6 0 .6 Kandiyohi township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 27 30 15 10 14 35 .90 33 .22 1 .2 0 .5 Keller township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 35 33 27 13 13 36 .05 35 .80 0 .9 0 .8 Larson CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 (X) (X) 14 (X) (X) 0 .41 0 .41 29 .3 34 .1 Lakeview township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 13 15 12 9 15 51 .56 49 .66 0 .3 0 .2 Leaf Mountain township . . . . . . . . . . 21 34 34 19 26 26 35 .99 34 .78 0 .6 0 .5 Lignite city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 155 174 242 96 111 126 0 .14 0 .14 1,107 .1 685 .7 Lucy township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 15 36 16 12 18 36 .09 34 .39 0 .8 0 .5 Minnesota township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 23 35 17 14 24 53 .45 52 .47 0 .4 0 .3 North Burke UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 3 4 2 2 4 12 .39 11 .58 0 .3 0 .2 North Star township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 48 62 23 29 37 40 .47 39 .93 0 .9 0 .6 Portal city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 126 131 192 80 98 104 0 .56 0 .56 225 .0 142 .9 Portal township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 42 47 19 24 30 42 .77 42 .58 0 .6 0 .4 Powers Lake city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 280 309 408 172 183 221 1 .23 0 .99 282 .8 173 .7 Richland township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 24 36 17 20 24 42 .79 42 .59 0 .4 0 .4 Roseland township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 30 32 15 18 19 35 .91 35 .73 0 .7 0 .4 Short Creek township . . . . . . . . . . . 37 37 65 28 29 36 43 .03 42 .78 0 .9 0 .7 Soo township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 27 47 18 19 24 42 .98 42 .68 0 .6 0 .4 Thorson township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 34 32 18 18 19 35 .91 35 .55 0 .7 0 .5 Vale township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 21 28 13 15 17 35 .72 34 .76 0 .7 0 .4 Vanville township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 30 34 13 14 17 35 .77 33 .40 0 .6 0 .4 Ward township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52 46 65 30 35 45 36 .00 35 .04 1 .5 0 .9







densityHousing unit

density


Burleigh County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81,308 69,416 60,131 35,754 r 29,004 23,803 1,668 .30 1,632 .65 49 .8 21 .9 Apple Creek township . . . . . . . . . . . 2,652 1,243 1,039 955 484 347 34 .90 34 .85 76 .1 27 .4 Bismarck city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61,272 r 55,392 49,272 28,648 r 24,218 20,047 31 .23 30 .84 1,986 .8 928 .9 Boyd township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 134 136 96 55 49 39 35 .99 35 .99 3 .7 1 .5 Burnt Creek-Riverview UT . . . . . . . . 2,254 1,306 754 815 458 251 58 .93 58 .01 38 .9 14 .0 Canfield township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 15 24 9 10 10 35 .94 35 .51 0 .3 0 .3 Christiania township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 35 47 18 18 20 36 .00 35 .97 1 .0 0 .5 Clear Lake township . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 30 31 14 13 19 36 .10 35 .91 1 .0 0 .4 Crofte township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 199 139 152 74 57 62 36 .16 36 .16 5 .5 2 .0 Cromwell township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 27 35 15 14 14 36 .21 36 .21 1 .0 0 .4 Driscoll township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 166 163 177 79 81 81 36 .05 35 .93 4 .6 2 .2 Driscoll CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82 (X) (X) 44 (X) (X) 0 .58 0 .58 141 .4 75 .9 Ecklund township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 103 105 124 58 53 59 53 .93 53 .93 1 .9 1 .1 Estherville township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 28 33 21 18 23 35 .49 35 .49 0 .9 0 .6 Florence Lake township . . . . . . . . . . 9 14 25 6 9 8 34 .96 32 .10 0 .3 0 .2 Francis township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 28 39 14 14 15 35 .83 35 .83 0 .7 0 .4 Ghylin township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 36 39 21 20 24 35 .65 35 .65 1 .2 0 .6 Gibbs township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,858 981 739 671 339 233 35 .01 34 .99 53 .1 19 .2 Glenview township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 216 148 160 88 59 62 39 .35 38 .73 5 .6 2 .3 Grass Lake township . . . . . . . . . . . . 69 74 67 35 29 30 36 .03 35 .46 1 .9 1 .0 Harriet-Lien township . . . . . . . . . . . . 67 74 (X) 34 33 (X) 71 .92 68 .95 1 .0 0 .5 Hay Creek township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,057 2,650 1,908 1,339 866 681 28 .15 27 .41 148 .0 48 .9 Hazel Grove township . . . . . . . . . . . 15 18 23 11 10 10 34 .95 34 .13 0 .4 0 .3 Lincoln city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,406 1,730 1,132 836 541 346 1 .12 1 .12 2,148 .2 746 .4 Lincoln-Fort Rice UT . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,850 r 3,179 2,259 1,033 753 532 28 .67 26 .42 145 .7 39 .1 Logan township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 47 47 18 17 24 36 .03 35 .82 1 .0 0 .5 Long Lake township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 103 109 100 58 46 64 36 .03 32 .25 3 .2 1 .8 Lyman UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 15 (X) 7 7 (X) 36 .13 35 .97 0 .3 0 .2 McKenzie township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 88 83 85 49 36 49 35 .92 35 .86 2 .5 1 .4 Menoken township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 154 147 137 70 63 56 35 .93 35 .87 4 .3 2 .0 Menoken CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70 (X) (X) 31 (X) (X) 2 .24 2 .18 32 .1 14 .2 Missouri township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 168 132 86 59 50 31 29 .36 23 .63 7 .1 2 .5 Morton township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 50 45 21 19 22 35 .98 35 .96 1 .2 0 .6 Naughton township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 158 141 144 68 49 44 35 .98 35 .98 4 .4 1 .9 Painted Woods township . . . . . . . . . 118 111 110 56 45 46 37 .65 36 .32 3 .2 1 .5 Phoenix UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 23 20 8 9 10 35 .92 34 .82 0 .5 0 .2 Regan city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 43 51 31 32 29 1 .01 1 .01 42 .6 30 .7 Richmond township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 39 45 17 19 23 36 .09 35 .00 0 .9 0 .5 Rock Hill township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 30 44 19 20 20 36 .11 36 .11 0 .7 0 .5 Schrunk township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 26 29 10 11 11 34 .43 32 .71 0 .6 0 .3 Sibley Butte township . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 26 31 12 13 15 36 .00 35 .99 0 .4 0 .3 Steiber township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 18 29 14 12 13 34 .27 34 .17 0 .7 0 .4 Sterling township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 149 172 183 80 87 84 35 .93 35 .93 4 .1 2 .2 Taft township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 50 33 15 20 21 35 .95 35 .81 0 .9 0 .4 Telfer township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74 64 61 28 30 23 36 .08 36 .02 2 .1 0 .8 Thelma township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 19 27 10 10 9 36 .10 34 .16 0 .5 0 .3 Trygg township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 47 44 17 18 16 36 .03 36 .03 1 .1 0 .5 Wild Rose township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 23 31 8 9 14 36 .01 31 .72 0 .6 0 .3 Wilson township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 50 49 25 26 27 34 .49 33 .67 1 .2 0 .7 Wilton city (part) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 161 242 176 103 106 81 0 .26 0 .25 644 .0 412 .0 Wing city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 152 124 208 90 89 97 0 .59 0 .59 257 .6 152 .5 Wing township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 34 33 12 15 13 35 .43 35 .42 0 .8 0 .3

Cass County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 149,778 123,138 102,874 67,938 53,790 42,407 1,767 .90 1,764 .94 84 .9 38 .5 Addison township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91 104 95 40 38 38 35 .97 35 .97 2 .5 1 .1 Alice city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 56 62 21 25 30 0 .96 0 .96 41 .7 21 .9 Amenia city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 94 89 82 38 35 31 1 .43 1 .43 65 .7 26 .6 Amenia township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105 112 132 49 42 48 34 .63 34 .62 3 .0 1 .4 Argusville city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 475 147 161 152 65 56 4 .01 4 .01 118 .5 37 .9 Arthur city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 337 402 400 144 140 133 1 .52 1 .52 221 .7 94 .7 Arthur township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78 82 71 29 31 33 34 .54 34 .54 2 .3 0 .8 Ayr city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 23 19 10 13 14 0 .08 0 .08 212 .5 125 .0 Ayr township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72 78 78 35 37 39 36 .02 36 .02 2 .0 1 .0 Barnes township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 525 289 13 173 96 0 .99 0 .97 25 .8 13 .4 Bell township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 41 52 18 18 19 35 .91 35 .91 1 .0 0 .5 Berlin township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 124 136 133 48 51 46 34 .19 34 .19 3 .6 1 .4 Briarwood city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73 78 88 28 26 27 0 .15 0 .15 486 .7 186 .7







densityHousing unit

density


Cass County—Con . Buffalo city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 188 209 204 101 105 108 0 .23 0 .23 817 .4 439 .1 Buffalo township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82 79 77 35 31 31 35 .94 35 .90 2 .3 1 .0 Casselton city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,329 1,855 1,601 926 738 664 1 .90 1 .87 1,245 .5 495 .2 Casselton township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78 117 111 32 55 36 33 .87 33 .87 2 .3 0 .9 Clifton township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75 71 78 30 29 38 35 .36 35 .14 2 .1 0 .9 Cornell township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59 60 90 24 25 28 36 .10 36 .10 1 .6 0 .7 Davenport city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 252 261 218 96 92 78 0 .27 0 .27 933 .3 355 .6 Davenport township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 144 134 131 59 52 56 35 .92 35 .92 4 .0 1 .6 Dows township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 63 76 20 22 28 36 .01 36 .01 1 .2 0 .6 Durbin township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83 92 106 42 39 39 35 .12 35 .07 2 .4 1 .2 Eldred township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 106 91 115 47 44 51 35 .44 35 .29 3 .0 1 .3 Embden CDP (part) . . . . . . . . . . . 43 (X) (X) 19 (X) (X) 0 .29 0 .29 148 .3 65 .5 Empire township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 114 109 124 51 50 49 35 .94 35 .93 3 .2 1 .4 Enderlin city (part) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 5 17 3 2 5 0 .03 0 .03 133 .3 100 .0 Erie township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 109 134 135 52 61 60 36 .03 35 .85 3 .0 1 .5 Erie CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 65 (X) 26 35 (X) 2 .01 2 .01 24 .9 12 .9 Everest township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 88 98 126 45 43 50 35 .13 35 .13 2 .5 1 .3 Fargo city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105,549 90,599 74,084 49,956 41,200 31,704 48 .82 48 .82 2,162 .0 1,023 .3 Fargo township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 6 – 3 2 – 0 .10 0 .10 40 .0 30 .0 Frontier city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 214 273 218 76 78 57 0 .19 0 .19 1,126 .3 400 .0 Gardner city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74 80 85 35 39 42 0 .50 0 .50 148 .0 70 .0 Gardner township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107 123 115 46 48 44 35 .60 35 .60 3 .0 1 .3 Gill township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 117 104 115 43 39 41 36 .01 35 .96 3 .3 1 .2 Grandin city (part) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 173 181 213 77 80 77 0 .15 0 .15 1,153 .3 513 .3 Gunkel township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 55 72 22 22 26 36 .18 36 .18 1 .2 0 .6 Harmony township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81 93 93 32 40 38 34 .53 34 .43 2 .4 0 .9 Harwood city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 718 607 590 248 201 172 1 .27 1 .26 569 .8 196 .8 Harwood township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 352 291 322 130 104 108 31 .01 30 .98 11 .4 4 .2 Brooktree Park CDP . . . . . . . . . . . 80 (X) (X) 29 (X) (X) 0 .18 0 .18 444 .4 161 .1 Highland township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 94 116 144 44 44 49 35 .93 35 .74 2 .6 1 .2 Hill township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53 51 64 26 28 26 35 .86 35 .86 1 .5 0 .7 Horace city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,430 915 662 826 311 216 10 .77 10 .77 225 .6 76 .7 Howes township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78 82 99 32 31 36 35 .82 35 .70 2 .2 0 .9 Embden CDP (part) . . . . . . . . . . . 16 (X) (X) 7 (X) (X) 0 .43 0 .43 37 .2 16 .3 Hunter city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 261 326 341 138 160 168 1 .53 1 .51 172 .8 91 .4 Hunter township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64 86 95 36 38 39 34 .38 34 .32 1 .9 1 .0 Kindred city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 692 614 569 289 267 246 1 .45 1 .45 477 .2 199 .3 Kinyon township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91 103 100 41 39 36 36 .02 36 .02 2 .5 1 .1 Lake township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 47 59 18 19 23 36 .05 35 .99 0 .9 0 .5 Leonard city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 223 255 310 121 124 137 0 .75 0 .75 297 .3 161 .3 Leonard township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 108 103 121 42 40 44 35 .23 35 .23 3 .1 1 .2 Maple River township . . . . . . . . . . . . 128 126 125 55 53 56 35 .69 35 .65 3 .6 1 .5 Mapleton city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 762 606 682 264 193 203 4 .00 4 .00 190 .5 66 .0 Mapleton township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 188 251 269 71 88 96 34 .02 33 .87 5 .6 2 .1 Noble township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74 89 99 40 35 38 31 .40 31 .40 2 .4 1 .3 Normanna township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 333 339 340 128 122 124 34 .47 34 .47 9 .7 3 .7 North River city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56 65 68 24 19 20 0 .07 0 .06 933 .3 400 .0 Oxbow city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 305 248 100 108 84 40 0 .42 0 .42 726 .2 257 .1 Page city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 232 225 266 121 125 144 0 .18 0 .18 1,288 .9 672 .2 Page township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52 60 59 21 26 26 35 .82 35 .80 1 .5 0 .6 Pleasant township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 468 426 354 185 156 120 36 .68 36 .62 12 .8 5 .1 Pontiac township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100 100 108 47 42 50 35 .92 35 .12 2 .8 1 .3 Prairie Rose city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73 68 78 26 20 23 0 .04 0 .04 1,825 .0 650 .0 Raymond township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 254 270 284 101 98 91 34 .43 34 .36 7 .4 2 .9 Reed township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,175 1,224 1,046 414 384 346 20 .37 20 .26 58 .0 20 .4 Reile’s Acres city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 513 254 210 147 72 56 0 .48 0 .48 1,068 .8 306 .3 Rich township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64 79 81 28 31 33 36 .14 36 .10 1 .8 0 .8 Rochester township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53 70 46 25 27 29 36 .06 36 .06 1 .5 0 .7 Rush River township . . . . . . . . . . . . 82 107 107 40 42 48 36 .43 36 .42 2 .3 1 .1 Stanley township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,218 2,296 1,933 454 769 611 25 .26 25 .26 48 .2 18 .0 Tower township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54 67 66 24 25 26 34 .56 34 .56 1 .6 0 .7 Tower City city (part) . . . . . . . . . . . . 253 252 233 114 112 115 1 .46 1 .46 173 .3 78 .1 Walburg township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 152 175 188 65 74 79 35 .98 35 .98 4 .2 1 .8 Warren township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 139 133 133 55 51 48 35 .65 35 .65 3 .9 1 .5 Watson township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93 90 123 42 44 46 35 .99 35 .99 2 .6 1 .2 West Fargo city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25,830 14,940 12,287 10,760 5,968 4,574 14 .71 14 .44 1,788 .8 745 .2 Wheatland township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 158 147 153 68 62 68 36 .12 36 .11 4 .4 1 .9 Wheatland CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68 60 (X) 33 28 (X) 4 .01 4 .01 17 .0 8 .2 Wiser township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 88 70 93 42 32 37 33 .68 33 .68 2 .6 1 .2







densityHousing unit

density


Cavalier County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,993 4,831 6,064 2,309 2,725 3,038 1,509 .96 1,488 .75 2 .7 1 .6 Alma township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 37 62 20 25 27 35 .76 35 .67 0 .8 0 .6 Alsen city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 68 113 28 45 67 29 .89 29 .36 1 .2 1 .0 Banner township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 43 58 17 18 27 29 .90 29 .07 1 .0 0 .6 Billings township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 26 37 13 11 12 28 .48 28 .21 0 .5 0 .5 Bruce township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 31 56 14 21 27 36 .10 35 .30 0 .5 0 .4 Byron township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 22 46 18 22 29 44 .97 44 .44 0 .6 0 .4 Calio city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 24 43 13 17 20 8 .89 8 .15 2 .7 1 .6 Calvin city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 26 27 10 19 22 0 .22 0 .22 90 .9 45 .5 Cypress township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 53 89 22 27 34 44 .45 44 .40 0 .9 0 .5 Dresden township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 50 74 19 25 29 44 .70 43 .87 0 .9 0 .4 Easby township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 52 48 19 23 33 36 .05 35 .82 1 .1 0 .5 East Alma township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 26 35 17 15 23 35 .96 35 .93 0 .6 0 .5 Elgin township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 242 232 310 98 97 111 34 .50 34 .23 7 .1 2 .9 Fremont township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55 69 110 36 39 49 55 .48 55 .41 1 .0 0 .6 Glenila township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 29 34 10 16 23 35 .88 35 .75 0 .4 0 .3 Gordon township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 19 31 11 14 24 27 .04 26 .64 0 .4 0 .4 Grey township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 22 46 13 19 23 36 .12 35 .50 0 .6 0 .4 Hannah city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 20 49 14 24 49 0 .19 0 .19 78 .9 73 .7 Harvey township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 36 79 25 27 30 35 .91 35 .76 0 .9 0 .7 Hay township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 53 67 23 26 34 35 .96 35 .86 1 .0 0 .6 Henderson township . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 54 63 18 20 24 29 .15 27 .92 1 .4 0 .6 Hope township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 42 63 19 23 31 29 .75 29 .62 0 .8 0 .6 Huron township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 34 48 15 20 24 36 .08 35 .68 0 .7 0 .4 Langdon city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,878 2,101 2,241 1,057 1,178 1,109 1 .68 1 .65 1,138 .2 640 .6 Langdon township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 38 54 15 22 26 36 .13 35 .96 0 .8 0 .4 Linden township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 31 46 12 18 23 44 .44 42 .62 0 .6 0 .3 Loam township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 47 58 19 27 35 34 .42 34 .34 1 .2 0 .6 Loma city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 21 27 13 10 13 26 .83 26 .43 0 .6 0 .5 Manilla township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83 112 172 39 45 62 36 .04 35 .73 2 .3 1 .1 Milton city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58 85 133 40 60 81 0 .51 0 .51 113 .7 78 .4 Minto township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 34 45 11 19 22 35 .83 34 .92 0 .7 0 .3 Montrose township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 72 75 32 40 51 35 .31 35 .26 1 .2 0 .9 Moscow township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 31 46 12 23 30 36 .00 34 .99 0 .5 0 .3 Mount Carmel township . . . . . . . . . . 41 78 104 26 48 52 45 .03 44 .35 0 .9 0 .6 Munich city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 210 268 310 116 124 135 1 .44 1 .43 146 .9 81 .1 Nekoma city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 51 63 36 41 51 0 .36 0 .36 138 .9 100 .0 Nekoma township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 47 53 17 20 27 35 .62 35 .15 0 .7 0 .5 North Loma township . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 19 34 6 10 11 18 .24 18 .09 0 .5 0 .3 North Olga township . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 52 75 28 32 40 41 .70 41 .68 0 .9 0 .7 Osford township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47 47 55 25 26 36 35 .85 35 .80 1 .3 0 .7 Osnabrock city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 134 174 214 73 85 90 0 .30 0 .30 446 .7 243 .3 Osnabrock township . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 48 51 22 24 30 35 .94 35 .50 1 .0 0 .6 Perry township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 47 72 25 26 30 36 .04 35 .83 1 .3 0 .7 Sarles city (part) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 22 83 26 42 55 0 .19 0 .19 126 .3 136 .8 Seivert township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 25 31 9 14 15 29 .93 28 .06 0 .5 0 .3 South Dresden township . . . . . . . . . 33 43 67 20 29 35 35 .91 35 .37 0 .9 0 .6 South Olga township . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 52 77 27 33 35 35 .88 35 .80 1 .1 0 .8 Storlie township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 20 30 10 11 16 25 .44 25 .10 0 .8 0 .4 Trier township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 51 67 22 24 25 32 .27 30 .35 1 .6 0 .7 Wales city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 30 48 20 31 43 0 .24 0 .23 134 .8 87 .0 Waterloo township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 58 65 17 21 34 35 .98 35 .34 1 .0 0 .5 West Hope township . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 57 78 42 48 53 44 .98 44 .39 1 .0 0 .9

Dickey County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,289 5,757 6,107 2,636 2,656 2,763 1,142 .13 1,131 .47 4 .7 2 .3 Ada township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51 60 54 23 23 30 35 .98 35 .98 1 .4 0 .6 Albertha township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 20 33 11 12 13 35 .98 33 .66 0 .7 0 .3 Albion township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 51 59 18 20 24 36 .17 36 .06 1 .2 0 .5 Bear Creek township . . . . . . . . . . . . 183 184 181 74 70 68 30 .11 30 .01 6 .1 2 .5 Clement township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 109 107 126 48 47 54 45 .66 45 .28 2 .4 1 .1 Divide township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79 89 81 36 31 34 35 .36 35 .13 2 .2 1 .0 Elden township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73 83 79 36 36 39 36 .16 36 .16 2 .0 1 .0 Ellendale city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,394 1,559 1,798 698 750 765 1 .52 1 .52 917 .1 459 .2 Ellendale township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 115 115 136 53 54 62 34 .55 34 .49 3 .3 1 .5 Elm township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 76 78 76 65 60 74 36 .14 35 .87 2 .1 1 .8 Forbes city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53 64 72 41 39 44 0 .25 0 .25 212 .0 164 .0 Fullerton city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54 85 94 39 39 41 0 .39 0 .39 138 .5 100 .0







densityHousing unit

density


Dickey County—Con . German township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 23 46 13 14 19 35 .48 34 .01 0 .5 0 .4 Grand Valley township . . . . . . . . . . . 25 29 38 21 20 22 36 .21 36 .04 0 .7 0 .6 Hamburg township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 24 27 16 16 23 36 .23 36 .18 0 .9 0 .4 Hudson township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 88 77 97 33 33 38 34 .27 33 .94 2 .6 1 .0 James River Valley township . . . . . . 40 51 50 19 21 24 28 .60 28 .60 1 .4 0 .7 Kent township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 25 34 15 10 16 35 .91 35 .88 0 .8 0 .4 Kentner township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 183 167 150 51 43 40 36 .12 36 .11 5 .1 1 .4 Keystone township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 50 51 18 19 22 35 .89 35 .89 1 .2 0 .5 Lorraine township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 52 54 19 21 23 35 .64 35 .61 1 .0 0 .5 Lovell township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 48 69 24 26 35 44 .06 43 .57 1 .0 0 .6 Ludden city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 29 41 19 18 26 0 .77 0 .77 29 .9 24 .7 Maple township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49 54 75 26 25 29 35 .76 35 .74 1 .4 0 .7 Monango city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 28 53 22 18 32 0 .37 0 .37 97 .3 59 .5 Northwest township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 22 37 12 13 18 33 .26 32 .73 0 .6 0 .4 Oakes city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,856 1,979 1,775 912 908 829 1 .64 1 .64 1,131 .7 556 .1 Port Emma township . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 68 62 27 27 37 26 .98 26 .49 1 .3 1 .0 Porter township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 51 66 25 27 30 35 .54 35 .27 1 .4 0 .7 Potsdam township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 39 59 18 22 24 34 .51 34 .47 1 .1 0 .5 Riverdale township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95 89 87 48 39 38 37 .41 37 .07 2 .6 1 .3 Spring Valley township . . . . . . . . . . . 28 30 31 17 17 18 35 .55 33 .27 0 .8 0 .5 Valley township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 38 68 22 20 29 35 .33 35 .33 0 .8 0 .6 Van Meter township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77 107 119 41 41 48 36 .08 36 .08 2 .1 1 .1 Whitestone township . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 33 40 13 13 18 36 .52 36 .17 0 .8 0 .4 Wright township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 76 92 27 28 32 35 .49 35 .29 1 .4 0 .8 Yorktown township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 41 48 20 19 21 35 .80 35 .80 1 .4 0 .6 Young township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 32 40 16 17 17 34 .42 34 .35 1 .0 0 .5

Divide County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,071 2,283 2,899 1,324 1,469 1,667 1,294 .23 1,260 .79 1 .6 1 .1 Alexandria township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 14 27 11 10 17 36 .10 35 .74 0 .4 0 .3 Ambrose city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 23 48 29 41 47 1 .07 1 .07 24 .3 27 .1 Ambrose township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 28 43 21 25 25 42 .36 41 .66 0 .4 0 .5 Blooming Prairie township . . . . . . . . 50 51 62 25 28 38 43 .27 42 .17 1 .2 0 .6 Blooming Valley township . . . . . . . . . 47 51 57 20 23 27 36 .09 35 .56 1 .3 0 .6 Border township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 26 44 18 19 19 36 .04 35 .22 0 .6 0 .5 Burg township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 36 31 14 17 19 36 .09 35 .63 0 .7 0 .4 Clinton township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 16 19 11 14 16 36 .05 35 .44 0 .4 0 .3 Coalfield township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 51 64 27 39 35 35 .65 35 .40 1 .0 0 .8 Crosby city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,070 1,089 1,312 613 637 687 1 .37 1 .37 781 .0 447 .4 Daneville township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 36 52 23 25 28 51 .91 50 .60 0 .7 0 .5 De Witt township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 38 32 14 21 18 42 .30 41 .21 0 .4 0 .3 Elkhorn township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 28 38 15 18 20 62 .47 59 .51 0 .4 0 .3 Fertile Valley township . . . . . . . . . . . 23 25 23 14 20 25 68 .90 64 .69 0 .4 0 .2 Fillmore township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 44 46 28 28 26 42 .01 40 .86 0 .9 0 .7 Fortuna city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 31 53 26 39 46 1 .01 1 .00 22 .0 26 .0 Frazier township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 23 32 13 13 16 36 .04 35 .05 0 .6 0 .4 Frederick township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 37 43 16 24 28 35 .90 35 .77 0 .5 0 .4 Garnet township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 16 28 11 13 23 35 .73 35 .44 0 .6 0 .3 Gooseneck township . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 39 54 25 26 27 43 .28 42 .46 0 .7 0 .6 Hawkeye township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 35 48 22 20 24 36 .02 35 .22 0 .9 0 .6 Hayland township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 34 40 16 19 20 35 .95 35 .07 0 .6 0 .5 Lincoln Valley township . . . . . . . . . . 22 26 39 13 19 18 36 .01 35 .30 0 .6 0 .4 Long Creek township . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 38 49 18 23 29 43 .50 42 .59 0 .9 0 .4 Mentor township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 24 31 15 21 24 43 .24 42 .68 0 .4 0 .4 Noonan city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 121 154 231 107 116 148 0 .31 0 .30 403 .3 356 .7 Palmer township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 15 17 13 10 10 35 .88 35 .26 0 .5 0 .4 Plumer township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 9 8 4 9 13 36 .05 34 .88 0 .3 0 .1 Sioux Trail township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 32 43 20 21 24 35 .84 35 .64 0 .7 0 .6 Smoky Butte township . . . . . . . . . . . 34 21 34 17 18 22 35 .95 35 .18 1 .0 0 .5 Stoneview township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 14 24 16 16 23 35 .77 35 .27 0 .6 0 .5 Troy township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 62 68 27 25 31 35 .96 34 .38 1 .3 0 .8 Twin Butte township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 17 33 13 14 16 36 .05 34 .69 0 .5 0 .4 Upland township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 23 31 13 13 17 36 .05 35 .12 0 .6 0 .4 Westby township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51 61 74 31 34 45 51 .87 48 .21 1 .1 0 .6 Writing Rock township . . . . . . . . . . . 7 16 21 5 11 16 36 .14 35 .13 0 .2 0 .1







densityHousing unit

density


Dunn County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,536 3,600 4,005 2,132 1,965 2,057 2,082 .04 2,008 .46 1 .8 1 .1 Dodge city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87 125 135 67 73 74 0 .47 0 .47 185 .1 142 .6 Dunn Center city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 146 122 128 80 81 80 0 .39 0 .39 374 .4 205 .1 Fort Berthold UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 435 402 (X) 496 350 (X) 417 .72 356 .74 1 .2 1 .4 Halliday city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 188 227 288 135 155 182 0 .46 0 .46 408 .7 293 .5 Halliday UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 411 458 847 254 257 469 504 .61 497 .50 0 .8 0 .5 Killdeer city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 751 713 722 342 351 367 0 .94 0 .94 798 .9 363 .8 Killdeer UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 917 856 (X) 469 417 (X) 663 .01 658 .95 1 .4 0 .7 Manning CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74 (X) (X) 30 (X) (X) 0 .57 0 .57 129 .8 52 .6 South Dunn UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 601 697 (X) 289 281 (X) 494 .44 493 .03 1 .2 0 .6

Eddy County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,385 2,757 2,951 1,323 1,418 1,470 644 .11 630 .17 3 .8 2 .1 Bush township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 54 58 20 22 27 36 .20 35 .50 1 .1 0 .6 Cherry Lake township . . . . . . . . . . . 33 35 49 16 17 20 34 .94 33 .38 1 .0 0 .5 Columbia township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 44 61 20 22 25 35 .06 34 .93 1 .0 0 .6 Colvin township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60 81 64 34 32 37 36 .08 35 .53 1 .7 1 .0 Eddy township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 48 46 20 21 26 36 .46 35 .80 1 .1 0 .6 Freeborn township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 102 78 91 48 44 56 36 .38 36 .06 2 .8 1 .3 Gates township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 56 75 26 31 52 35 .86 35 .49 1 .2 0 .7 Grandfield township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 41 56 19 20 28 35 .93 35 .84 0 .6 0 .5 Hillsdale township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 48 44 21 19 20 36 .41 34 .82 1 .2 0 .6 Lake Washington township . . . . . . . 27 33 32 13 15 19 35 .92 31 .80 0 .8 0 .4 Munster township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56 80 87 28 31 37 36 .07 35 .91 1 .6 0 .8 New Rockford city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,391 1,463 1,604 750 778 760 1 .54 1 .51 921 .2 496 .7 New Rockford township . . . . . . . . . . 81 105 88 41 46 45 34 .74 34 .52 2 .3 1 .2 Paradise township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 43 31 18 18 20 35 .22 32 .98 1 .2 0 .5 Pleasant Prairie township . . . . . . . . 32 39 57 18 19 28 34 .81 34 .56 0 .9 0 .5 Rosefield township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 58 61 22 24 30 35 .11 34 .96 0 .9 0 .6 Sheldon township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 22 45 16 17 19 36 .08 35 .75 0 .6 0 .4 Sheyenne city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 204 318 272 147 187 155 0 .16 0 .16 1,275 .0 918 .8 Superior township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55 68 86 28 34 44 35 .00 34 .73 1 .6 0 .8 Tiffany township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 43 44 18 21 22 36 .13 35 .94 0 .9 0 .5

Emmons County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,550 4,331 4,830 2,085 2,168 2,200 1,555 .02 1,510 .43 2 .4 1 .4 Braddock city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 43 56 24 27 31 0 .25 0 .25 84 .0 96 .0 Campbell township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65 66 83 35 37 43 36 .74 34 .82 1 .9 1 .0 Hague city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71 91 109 51 53 59 0 .27 0 .27 263 .0 188 .9 Hazelton city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 235 237 240 126 129 126 0 .36 0 .36 652 .8 350 .0 Linton city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,097 1,321 1,410 642 701 684 0 .75 0 .75 1,462 .7 856 .0 North Emmons UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 832 59 (X) 468 25 (X) 791 .85 774 .33 1 .1 0 .6 South Emmons UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 820 685 775 515 271 276 724 .50 699 .36 1 .2 0 .7 Strasburg city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 409 549 553 224 245 241 0 .30 0 .30 1,363 .3 746 .7

Foster County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,343 3,759 3,983 1,801 1,793 1,876 646 .82 635 .45 5 .3 2 .8 Birtsell township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 97 114 121 43 47 48 35 .88 35 .75 2 .7 1 .2 Bordulac township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75 97 104 40 38 44 35 .90 34 .03 2 .2 1 .2 Bucephalia township . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 61 63 25 27 29 36 .09 35 .43 1 .2 0 .7 Carrington city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,065 2,268 2,267 1,057 1,057 1,047 2 .11 2 .11 978 .7 500 .9 Carrington township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 205 182 183 80 66 78 34 .38 34 .04 6 .0 2 .4 Eastman township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 23 39 14 12 20 36 .05 35 .59 0 .5 0 .4 Estabrook township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74 67 72 30 32 30 35 .90 35 .88 2 .1 0 .8 Florance township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 46 89 99 84 91 35 .89 34 .73 0 .9 2 .9 Glenfield city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91 134 118 57 59 62 0 .14 0 .14 650 .0 407 .1 Glenfield township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51 68 85 32 34 38 35 .83 35 .70 1 .4 0 .9 Grace City city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63 71 108 36 39 49 0 .40 0 .40 157 .5 90 .0 Haven township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 47 50 24 23 23 35 .92 35 .29 1 .0 0 .7 Larrabee township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56 46 60 22 23 25 35 .50 34 .81 1 .6 0 .6 Longview township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47 53 56 26 25 32 36 .12 35 .36 1 .3 0 .7 McHenry city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56 71 85 37 45 57 0 .25 0 .25 224 .0 148 .0 McHenry township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51 65 87 29 28 34 35 .66 35 .01 1 .5 0 .8 McKinnon township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 36 43 16 19 22 36 .04 35 .66 0 .7 0 .4 Melville township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 38 55 26 23 27 36 .09 34 .33 1 .0 0 .8 Nordmore township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65 70 90 28 30 35 35 .67 35 .54 1 .8 0 .8 Rolling Prairie township . . . . . . . . . . 32 41 52 21 20 24 35 .97 35 .69 0 .9 0 .6 Rose Hill township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66 90 94 34 37 34 35 .69 35 .10 1 .9 1 .0 Wyard township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63 71 62 25 25 27 35 .33 34 .59 1 .8 0 .7







densityHousing unit

density


Golden Valley County . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,680 1,924 2,108 967 973 1,035 1,002 .39 1,000 .79 1 .7 1 .0 Beach city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,019 1,116 1,205 601 570 614 1 .93 1 .93 528 .0 311 .4 Beach township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 157 189 201 57 56 64 105 .01 104 .91 1 .5 0 .5 Bullion township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 25 50 11 19 25 35 .88 35 .86 0 .8 0 .3 Delhi township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 43 46 17 17 18 35 .90 35 .85 0 .8 0 .5 East Golden Valley UT . . . . . . . . . . . 22 12 13 7 4 5 71 .30 71 .15 0 .3 0 .1 Elk Creek township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 11 10 6 5 6 35 .73 35 .66 0 .2 0 .2 Elmwood UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 9 13 9 8 7 35 .61 35 .58 0 .5 0 .3 Garner township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 28 25 13 17 12 35 .89 35 .86 0 .4 0 .4 Golva city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61 106 101 52 71 62 0 .33 0 .33 184 .8 157 .6 Henry township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 27 27 17 20 15 72 .46 72 .40 0 .3 0 .2 Lone Tree township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 126 156 166 62 64 70 105 .20 105 .07 1 .2 0 .6 North Golden Valley UT . . . . . . . . . . 22 32 35 16 16 19 143 .30 143 .15 0 .2 0 .1 Pearl township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 9 12 5 5 6 72 .30 72 .19 0 .1 0 .1 Saddle Butte township . . . . . . . . . . . 25 27 40 21 17 23 35 .46 35 .28 0 .7 0 .6 Sentinel township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 45 62 28 28 32 143 .64 143 .35 0 .3 0 .2 Sentinel Butte city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56 62 79 38 44 45 1 .06 1 .04 53 .8 36 .5 South Golden Valley UT . . . . . . . . . . 15 27 23 7 12 12 71 .40 71 .16 0 .2 0 .1

Grand Forks County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66,861 66,109 70,683 29,344 27,373 27,085 1,439 .50 1,436 .38 46 .5 20 .4 Agnes township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72 83 94 43 45 51 36 .12 36 .12 2 .0 1 .2 Allendale township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 470 368 284 159 121 90 35 .96 35 .92 13 .1 4 .4 Americus township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 159 162 161 65 66 69 36 .03 36 .01 4 .4 1 .8 Arvilla township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 338 334 322 148 142 140 35 .84 35 .84 9 .4 4 .1 Avon township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78 86 141 48 47 53 35 .87 35 .87 2 .2 1 .3 Bentru township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77 64 52 28 24 30 17 .73 17 .60 4 .4 1 .6 Blooming township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 295 761 1,456 124 226 480 34 .85 34 .53 8 .5 3 .6 Grand Forks AFB CDP (part) . . . . – 490 1,220 – 108 362 0 .83 0 .83 – – Brenna township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 725 638 526 263 225 178 36 .01 35 .98 20 .2 7 .3 Chester township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 122 155 150 66 72 61 36 .15 36 .15 3 .4 1 .8 Elkmount township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 54 53 22 26 27 35 .99 35 .86 1 .4 0 .6 Elm Grove township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 120 123 134 69 69 67 36 .47 36 .47 3 .3 1 .9 Emerado city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 414 510 483 233 328 277 0 .31 0 .31 1,335 .5 751 .6 Fairfield township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 117 126 106 48 43 38 35 .53 35 .51 3 .3 1 .4 Falconer township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 304 313 314 117 111 109 12 .51 12 .37 24 .6 9 .5 Ferry township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 359 380 373 151 141 134 46 .18 45 .99 7 .8 3 .3 Gilby city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 237 243 262 110 114 117 0 .17 0 .17 1,394 .1 647 .1 Gilby township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79 122 133 48 52 56 36 .05 36 .05 2 .2 1 .3 Grace township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81 82 90 36 35 34 36 .40 36 .38 2 .2 1 .0 Grand Forks city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52,838 r 49,366 49,417 23,449 r 20,873 19,586 20 .09 19 .90 2,655 .2 1,178 .3 Grand Forks township . . . . . . . . . . . 505 r 403 470 207 r 149 152 11 .02 10 .95 46 .1 18 .9 Hegton township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 204 172 195 81 71 70 36 .54 36 .19 5 .6 2 .2 Inkster city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 102 95 50 55 66 1 .00 1 .00 50 .0 50 .0 Inkster township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 139 127 127 45 42 44 35 .58 35 .41 3 .9 1 .3 Johnstown township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79 91 109 44 49 60 36 .20 36 .20 2 .2 1 .2 Lakeville township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69 71 91 37 32 42 35 .95 35 .47 1 .9 1 .0 Larimore city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,346 1,433 1,464 623 620 654 0 .59 0 .59 2,281 .4 1,055 .9 Larimore township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 117 122 151 55 55 57 35 .84 35 .82 3 .3 1 .5 Levant township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58 56 59 26 30 32 35 .95 35 .95 1 .6 0 .7 Lind township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62 65 86 32 31 31 36 .15 36 .11 1 .7 0 .9 Logan Center township . . . . . . . . . . 44 48 63 22 22 26 36 .10 36 .08 1 .2 0 .6 Loretta township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 52 69 28 30 31 36 .14 36 .14 1 .4 0 .8 Manvel city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 360 370 333 149 144 129 0 .29 0 .29 1,241 .4 513 .8 Mekinock township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,535 4,529 8,316 892 1,494 2,352 36 .47 36 .47 69 .5 24 .5 Grand Forks AFB CDP (part) . . . . 2,367 4,342 8,123 807 1,408 2,256 7 .31 7 .31 323 .8 110 .4 Michigan township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 139 161 162 56 61 61 36 .07 36 .05 3 .9 1 .6 Moraine township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66 77 121 32 33 37 35 .91 35 .87 1 .8 0 .9 Niagara city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53 57 73 29 35 37 0 .97 0 .94 56 .4 30 .9 Niagara township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72 94 91 35 38 35 35 .21 35 .16 2 .0 1 .0 Northwood city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 945 959 1,166 443 459 503 1 .27 1 .27 744 .1 348 .8 Northwood township . . . . . . . . . . . . 138 138 160 54 53 56 34 .52 34 .52 4 .0 1 .6 Oakville township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 200 238 176 100 88 66 35 .11 35 .06 5 .7 2 .9 Pleasant View township . . . . . . . . . . 138 135 163 58 54 55 36 .05 36 .05 3 .8 1 .6 Plymouth township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68 71 107 36 43 52 36 .11 36 .05 1 .9 1 .0 Reynolds city (part) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93 126 107 44 49 50 0 .25 0 .25 372 .0 176 .0 Rye township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 297 261 213 124 99 73 33 .34 33 .34 8 .9 3 .7 Strabane township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98 136 154 48 57 66 35 .56 35 .55 2 .8 1 .4







densityHousing unit

density


Grand Forks County—Con . Thompson city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 986 1,006 930 362 339 294 0 .46 0 .46 2,143 .5 787 .0 Turtle River township . . . . . . . . . . . . 174 218 177 66 72 68 33 .56 33 .29 5 .2 2 .0 Union township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 194 209 201 78 74 81 35 .95 35 .93 5 .4 2 .2 Walle township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 457 369 277 177 145 116 38 .91 38 .72 11 .8 4 .6 Washington township . . . . . . . . . . . . 116 134 125 49 50 51 36 .04 36 .04 3 .2 1 .4 Wheatfield township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74 109 100 35 40 41 36 .14 36 .14 2 .0 1 .0

Grant County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,394 2,841 3,549 1,690 1,722 2,011 1,665 .92 1,659 .14 1 .4 1 .0 Carson city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 293 319 383 194 201 224 4 .02 4 .02 72 .9 48 .3 East Grant UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 540 684 714 301 294 310 750 .57 750 .22 0 .7 0 .4 Elgin city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 642 659 765 416 379 415 1 .05 1 .05 611 .4 396 .2 Elm township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 57 70 26 35 41 34 .75 34 .75 1 .3 0 .7 Heil CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 (X) (X) 11 (X) (X) 0 .20 0 .20 75 .0 55 .0 Fisher township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 24 36 11 11 13 32 .99 32 .94 0 .5 0 .3 Freda township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 12 21 5 5 10 35 .96 35 .92 0 .3 0 .1 Howe township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 11 16 7 5 12 31 .66 31 .63 0 .4 0 .2 Lark township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 60 68 22 26 30 36 .00 36 .00 1 .3 0 .6 Leipzig township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 55 83 26 23 32 35 .98 35 .98 1 .1 0 .7 Leith city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 28 43 18 21 28 1 .25 1 .23 13 .0 14 .6 Minnie township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63 76 102 35 38 44 34 .70 34 .70 1 .8 1 .0 New Leipzig city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 221 274 326 155 164 180 0 .89 0 .89 248 .3 174 .2 Pretty Rock township . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 18 31 12 13 16 35 .82 35 .82 0 .4 0 .3 Raleigh township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 62 86 29 37 45 36 .01 35 .99 1 .0 0 .8 Raleigh CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 (X) (X) 9 (X) (X) 0 .29 0 .29 41 .4 31 .0 Rock township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 23 32 8 10 15 35 .58 35 .58 0 .4 0 .2 West Grant UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 343 404 559 410 429 512 518 .29 512 .09 0 .7 0 .8 Winona township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 48 39 15 17 15 40 .40 40 .33 1 .0 0 .4

Griggs County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,420 2,754 3,303 1,461 1,521 1,660 716 .44 708 .81 3 .4 2 .1 Addie township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64 53 70 34 34 38 35 .58 33 .27 1 .9 1 .0 Ball Hill township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55 82 109 32 34 39 36 .49 36 .49 1 .5 0 .9 Bartley township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 31 46 17 19 21 34 .88 34 .32 0 .7 0 .5 Binford city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 183 201 233 125 120 129 0 .35 0 .35 522 .9 357 .1 Broadview township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 35 53 22 23 30 35 .38 33 .92 1 .1 0 .6 Bryan township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 63 70 24 26 30 35 .97 35 .95 1 .1 0 .7 Clearfield township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 49 65 26 24 32 35 .99 35 .36 1 .2 0 .7 Cooperstown city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 984 1,053 1,247 543 563 595 0 .97 0 .97 1,014 .4 559 .8 Cooperstown township . . . . . . . . . . . 56 82 86 32 33 35 35 .75 35 .45 1 .6 0 .9 Dover township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 55 57 25 25 25 35 .35 35 .19 1 .3 0 .7 Greenfield township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 102 92 117 50 51 66 34 .91 34 .91 2 .9 1 .4 Hannaford city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 131 181 204 79 85 92 0 .22 0 .22 595 .5 359 .1 Helena township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 58 64 24 28 36 36 .08 35 .98 1 .4 0 .7 Kingsley township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 59 74 25 24 30 36 .04 36 .04 1 .4 0 .7 Lenora township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60 87 97 32 36 39 35 .24 34 .79 1 .7 0 .9 Mabel township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52 81 110 47 54 64 36 .10 35 .99 1 .4 1 .3 Sutton CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 (X) (X) 23 (X) (X) 0 .20 0 .20 85 .0 115 .0 Pilot Mound township . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 59 81 28 31 37 36 .20 36 .06 1 .1 0 .8 Romness township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 50 50 23 25 29 35 .77 35 .72 1 .0 0 .6 Rosendal township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 40 54 71 79 89 35 .26 34 .78 1 .0 2 .0 Sverdrup township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92 90 109 42 46 45 36 .05 36 .01 2 .6 1 .2 Tyrol township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 116 125 161 56 57 61 36 .86 36 .67 3 .2 1 .5 Jessie CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 (X) (X) 14 (X) (X) 0 .47 0 .47 53 .2 29 .8 Washburn township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68 73 67 31 30 31 35 .89 35 .86 1 .9 0 .9 Willow township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53 55 79 73 74 67 35 .11 34 .52 1 .5 2 .1

Hettinger County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,477 2,715 3,445 1,414 1,419 1,637 1,133 .78 1,132 .22 2 .2 1 .2 Acme township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 37 34 14 16 16 36 .02 36 .01 0 .7 0 .4 Ashby township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 8 10 5 5 7 32 .18 32 .18 0 .1 0 .2 Baer township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 31 41 12 12 16 32 .34 32 .26 0 .8 0 .4 Beery township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 30 (X) 13 15 (X) 35 .46 35 .26 0 .9 0 .4 Black Butte township . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 46 47 20 16 16 35 .80 35 .80 1 .1 0 .6 Brittian township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 15 25 12 12 14 35 .78 35 .70 0 .5 0 .3 Campbell township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 37 62 20 17 23 35 .15 35 .13 0 .8 0 .6 Cannon Ball township . . . . . . . . . . . 45 60 104 33 33 37 35 .99 35 .99 1 .3 0 .9 Castle Rock township . . . . . . . . . . . 49 80 96 33 37 51 35 .93 35 .92 1 .4 0 .9 Central Hettinger UT . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 (X) (X) 24 (X) (X) 71 .62 71 .52 0 .6 0 .3







densityHousing unit

density


Hettinger County—Con . Chilton township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 42 36 16 14 18 36 .24 36 .20 0 .9 0 .4 Clark township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 24 32 13 12 13 35 .52 35 .51 0 .9 0 .4 Farina township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 29 52 17 14 15 36 .47 36 .27 0 .5 0 .5 Havelock township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 27 34 12 13 17 35 .58 35 .57 0 .6 0 .3 Highland township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 24 34 12 11 13 34 .39 34 .37 0 .4 0 .3 Kennedy township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 36 63 24 22 29 36 .14 36 .07 0 .9 0 .7 Kern township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 21 22 14 12 8 32 .38 32 .36 0 .6 0 .4 Kunze township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51 46 66 31 29 31 36 .46 36 .43 1 .4 0 .9 Madison township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 52 55 15 15 16 36 .32 36 .32 1 .1 0 .4 Merrill township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 13 11 8 10 8 32 .29 32 .03 0 .3 0 .2 Mott city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 721 808 1,019 415 441 506 0 .90 0 .90 801 .1 461 .1 Mott township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60 40 69 32 22 29 35 .27 35 .20 1 .7 0 .9 New England city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 600 555 663 319 320 363 0 .49 0 .49 1,224 .5 651 .0 New England township . . . . . . . . . . 107 107 124 47 44 46 35 .58 35 .58 3 .0 1 .3 Odessa township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 17 25 9 9 10 35 .83 35 .77 0 .4 0 .3 Regent city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 160 211 268 120 126 142 0 .56 0 .56 285 .7 214 .3 Rifle township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 46 55 20 18 21 35 .56 35 .54 1 .2 0 .6 St . Croix township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 46 48 16 15 16 36 .66 36 .66 0 .9 0 .4 Solon township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 33 42 19 17 19 35 .97 35 .89 0 .6 0 .5 Steiner township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 36 33 14 15 15 35 .07 35 .03 0 .7 0 .4 Strehlow township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 27 46 13 12 19 35 .96 35 .88 0 .8 0 .4 Tepee Butte township . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 37 54 19 17 17 35 .81 35 .80 1 .1 0 .5 Wagendorf township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 24 46 11 13 23 35 .97 35 .96 0 .5 0 .3 Walker township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 26 36 12 11 15 36 .11 36 .07 0 .6 0 .3

Kidder County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,435 2,753 3,332 1,674 1,610 1,672 1,432 .91 1,351 .19 1 .8 1 .2 Allen township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55 68 66 23 25 24 35 .29 34 .19 1 .6 0 .7 Atwood township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 29 47 16 19 21 35 .53 33 .49 0 .6 0 .5 Baker township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 39 60 20 19 21 39 .93 39 .30 1 .0 0 .5 Buckeye township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 30 34 19 18 21 35 .88 32 .53 0 .9 0 .6 Bunker township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 35 48 17 18 21 36 .07 36 .01 0 .6 0 .5 Chestina township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 21 40 14 14 14 35 .98 35 .73 0 .7 0 .4 Clear Lake township . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 56 65 28 28 32 35 .55 34 .51 1 .1 0 .8 Crown Hill township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 19 25 10 8 12 32 .27 30 .80 0 .2 0 .3 Crystal Springs township . . . . . . . . . 32 45 64 25 25 27 36 .05 35 .41 0 .9 0 .7 Dawson city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61 75 78 54 52 50 0 .34 0 .34 179 .4 158 .8 Excelsior township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 26 46 16 11 14 36 .09 35 .57 1 .0 0 .4 Frettim township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 22 39 16 14 16 35 .83 33 .27 0 .3 0 .5 Graf township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 21 39 17 19 21 36 .00 31 .40 0 .6 0 .5 Haynes township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 19 27 9 9 12 35 .84 34 .34 0 .5 0 .3 Kickapoo UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 16 29 10 9 10 35 .50 33 .03 0 .2 0 .3 Lake Williams township . . . . . . . . . . 22 18 39 32 25 24 35 .82 31 .27 0 .7 1 .0 Manning township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65 77 103 38 38 32 71 .59 69 .34 0 .9 0 .5 Merkel township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 39 65 21 21 25 71 .59 65 .64 0 .4 0 .3 Northwest township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 26 34 13 12 12 34 .46 32 .80 0 .7 0 .4 Peace township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 33 49 12 17 17 36 .16 34 .02 0 .8 0 .4 Petersville township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 27 43 17 22 22 35 .94 34 .01 0 .4 0 .5 Pettibone city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70 88 93 62 60 66 0 .17 0 .17 411 .8 364 .7 Pettibone township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 50 70 31 26 29 35 .75 32 .13 1 .4 1 .0 Pleasant Hill township . . . . . . . . . . . 56 50 59 25 21 24 35 .96 35 .45 1 .6 0 .7 Quinby township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 9 23 8 6 8 35 .96 29 .27 0 .2 0 .3 Rexine township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 4 28 7 7 13 35 .56 33 .95 0 .1 0 .2 Robinson city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 71 87 56 56 61 0 .17 0 .17 217 .6 329 .4 Robinson township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 38 61 21 21 23 35 .94 34 .40 1 .0 0 .6 Sibley township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77 100 91 217 192 192 35 .66 31 .64 2 .4 6 .9 South Kidder UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81 38 36 25 14 15 36 .07 33 .12 2 .4 0 .8 Steele city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 715 761 762 362 367 351 0 .57 0 .57 1,254 .4 635 .1 Stewart township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 19 34 13 12 12 34 .64 33 .27 0 .8 0 .4 Tanner township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 33 41 20 16 19 36 .34 34 .10 0 .8 0 .6 Tappen city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 197 210 239 106 100 114 1 .05 1 .05 187 .6 101 .0 Tappen township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91 90 95 37 32 32 34 .91 34 .68 2 .6 1 .1 Tuttle city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80 106 160 69 79 86 0 .25 0 .25 320 .0 276 .0 Tuttle township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 56 89 33 33 32 35 .49 34 .48 1 .1 1 .0 Valley township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 38 42 13 14 15 36 .00 34 .67 0 .7 0 .4 Vernon township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 35 45 42 35 34 36 .03 29 .98 0 .9 1 .4 Wallace township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 25 33 13 14 14 35 .57 34 .13 0 .7 0 .4







densityHousing unit

density


Kidder County—Con . Weiser township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 41 53 21 26 25 35 .92 34 .86 1 .0 0 .6 Westford township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 40 40 16 15 14 36 .14 33 .40 0 .8 0 .5 Williams township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 21 22 10 8 9 36 .24 33 .81 0 .4 0 .3 Woodlawn township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 94 89 89 40 33 36 34 .81 34 .66 2 .7 1 .2

LaMoure County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,139 4,701 5,383 2,238 2,271 2,434 1,150 .89 1,145 .94 3 .6 2 .0 Adrian township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 99 110 132 58 52 56 35 .98 35 .97 2 .8 1 .6 Badger township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52 59 64 24 23 26 36 .09 35 .79 1 .5 0 .7 Berlin city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 35 38 18 20 18 0 .10 0 .10 340 .0 180 .0 Black Loam township . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 65 79 29 32 32 36 .03 35 .96 1 .2 0 .8 Bluebird township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 41 68 24 30 34 35 .63 35 .57 1 .0 0 .7 Dean township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 224 205 215 68 61 59 34 .78 34 .35 6 .5 2 .0 Dickey city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 57 53 31 31 31 0 .22 0 .22 190 .9 140 .9 Edgeley city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 563 637 680 313 336 340 0 .75 0 .75 750 .7 417 .3 Gladstone township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51 62 90 30 29 37 36 .01 36 .01 1 .4 0 .8 Glen township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 47 58 31 29 37 35 .37 33 .99 1 .1 0 .9 Glenmore township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53 71 74 29 33 32 35 .96 35 .96 1 .5 0 .8 Golden Glen township . . . . . . . . . . . 108 111 136 57 46 57 35 .35 35 .27 3 .1 1 .6 Grand Rapids township . . . . . . . . . . 90 101 120 42 44 44 35 .94 35 .94 2 .5 1 .2 Grandview township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 55 85 27 28 34 35 .92 35 .85 1 .3 0 .8 Greenville township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47 80 94 31 35 31 35 .96 35 .87 1 .3 0 .9 Henrietta township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84 90 85 32 32 32 36 .04 36 .01 2 .3 0 .9 Jud city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72 76 84 50 51 53 0 .25 0 .25 288 .0 200 .0 Kennison township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 108 99 120 52 58 60 35 .85 35 .83 3 .0 1 .5 Kulm city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 354 422 514 248 251 283 0 .38 0 .38 931 .6 652 .6 LaMoure city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 889 944 970 436 433 430 1 .32 1 .32 673 .5 330 .3 Litchville township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49 69 90 30 36 45 36 .06 36 .00 1 .4 0 .8 Marion city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 133 146 169 81 86 92 1 .00 0 .84 158 .3 96 .4 Mikkelson township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 42 63 23 23 25 35 .69 35 .61 1 .0 0 .6 Nora township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71 81 87 30 30 34 36 .01 35 .95 2 .0 0 .8 Norden township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51 60 77 29 30 32 35 .61 35 .56 1 .4 0 .8 Ovid township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 60 81 25 27 32 35 .83 35 .33 1 .3 0 .7 Pearl Lake township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54 61 81 26 24 27 36 .03 35 .27 1 .5 0 .7 Pomona View township . . . . . . . . . . 22 19 43 15 12 26 35 .97 35 .84 0 .6 0 .4 Prairie township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 51 84 32 40 43 36 .13 36 .12 1 .2 0 .9 Raney township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 30 33 14 12 20 35 .47 35 .43 0 .7 0 .4 Ray township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 47 64 20 22 28 35 .96 35 .96 1 .2 0 .6 Roscoe township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59 58 96 33 27 34 35 .91 35 .91 1 .6 0 .9 Russell township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 52 71 27 28 33 36 .00 35 .99 1 .0 0 .8 Ryan township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70 95 107 35 36 40 35 .87 35 .59 2 .0 1 .0 Saratoga township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52 57 62 26 26 29 36 .19 36 .15 1 .4 0 .7 Sheridan township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 33 51 22 20 19 35 .03 34 .90 0 .8 0 .6 Swede township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 61 61 34 26 39 35 .78 35 .72 1 .0 1 .0 Verona city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85 108 103 47 53 53 0 .25 0 .25 340 .0 188 .0 Wano township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 59 62 15 17 22 36 .04 36 .04 1 .0 0 .4 Willowbank township . . . . . . . . . . . . 135 145 139 44 42 35 36 .12 36 .09 3 .7 1 .2

Logan County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,990 2,308 2,847 1,144 1,193 1,335 1,011 .24 992 .82 2 .0 1 .2 East Logan UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 263 412 594 168 214 257 314 .07 304 .77 0 .9 0 .6 Finn township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 33 29 18 19 17 34 .64 33 .80 0 .5 0 .5 Fredonia city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 51 66 37 30 37 0 .24 0 .24 191 .7 154 .2 Gackle city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 310 335 450 211 212 221 0 .56 0 .54 574 .1 390 .7 Glendale township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55 56 67 23 23 23 36 .74 36 .68 1 .5 0 .6 Gutschmidt township . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 42 48 18 19 23 36 .45 35 .99 0 .8 0 .5 Haag township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 37 47 13 21 25 35 .96 35 .96 0 .7 0 .4 Janke township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 30 41 18 20 23 36 .16 35 .99 0 .8 0 .5 Lehr city (part) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 25 44 20 22 27 0 .07 0 .07 200 .0 285 .7 Napoleon city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 792 857 930 401 420 460 1 .40 1 .40 565 .7 286 .4 Red Lake township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 39 59 28 29 42 35 .70 33 .57 1 .3 0 .8 Sealy township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 31 40 11 14 16 36 .52 36 .36 0 .6 0 .3 West Logan UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 346 221 266 178 89 97 442 .73 437 .42 0 .8 0 .4

McHenry County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,395 5,987 6,528 2,948 2,983 3,320 1,911 .54 1,873 .95 2 .9 1 .6 Anamoose city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 227 282 277 140 149 161 0 .62 0 .61 372 .1 229 .5 Anamoose township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64 68 89 37 31 35 35 .47 35 .07 1 .8 1 .1 Balfour city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 20 33 18 21 35 0 .49 0 .49 53 .1 36 .7







densityHousing unit

density


McHenry County—Con . Balfour township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 59 49 22 21 27 35 .69 35 .02 1 .1 0 .6 Bantry city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 19 16 8 11 22 0 .17 0 .17 82 .4 47 .1 Bantry township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 46 66 22 22 31 35 .79 35 .70 1 .0 0 .6 Bergen city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 11 15 10 11 9 0 .74 0 .74 9 .5 13 .5 Berwick township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57 62 93 27 27 37 36 .32 36 .08 1 .6 0 .7 Bjornson township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 59 56 22 23 26 35 .67 35 .39 1 .2 0 .6 Brown township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80 81 81 28 28 32 35 .42 35 .22 2 .3 0 .8 Cottonwood Lake township . . . . . . . 20 27 36 14 14 19 36 .01 34 .24 0 .6 0 .4 Deep River township . . . . . . . . . . . . 48 82 59 26 37 36 36 .15 36 .06 1 .3 0 .7 Deering city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98 118 99 44 50 59 0 .07 0 .07 1,400 .0 628 .6 Deering township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107 91 101 49 39 41 36 .04 35 .95 3 .0 1 .4 Denbigh township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83 72 71 38 32 29 36 .47 36 .12 2 .3 1 .1 Drake city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 275 322 361 200 201 228 2 .02 1 .97 139 .6 101 .5 East McHenry UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 86 130 122 49 53 68 179 .98 175 .56 0 .5 0 .3 Egg Creek township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65 58 55 30 26 25 36 .40 34 .29 1 .9 0 .9 Falsen township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 21 43 13 13 18 35 .93 35 .85 0 .6 0 .4 Gilmore township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 16 20 9 8 11 36 .16 35 .49 0 .4 0 .3 Granville city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 241 286 236 135 141 142 0 .28 0 .27 892 .6 500 .0 Granville township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107 107 114 46 38 48 35 .94 35 .16 3 .0 1 .3 Grilley township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55 57 78 28 28 34 36 .03 35 .93 1 .5 0 .8 Hendrickson township . . . . . . . . . . . 55 76 71 30 30 33 36 .15 36 .07 1 .5 0 .8 Karlsruhe city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82 119 143 61 70 76 0 .75 0 .75 109 .3 81 .3 Karlsruhe township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 60 63 24 25 28 35 .39 34 .28 1 .1 0 .7 Kief city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 13 24 12 18 21 1 .24 1 .22 10 .7 9 .8 Kottke Valley township . . . . . . . . . . . 49 58 43 20 22 24 35 .64 35 .64 1 .4 0 .6 Lake George township . . . . . . . . . . . 40 59 77 20 28 30 36 .08 35 .25 1 .1 0 .6 Lake Hester township . . . . . . . . . . . 45 58 74 30 28 34 35 .96 35 .67 1 .3 0 .8 Land township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 48 64 22 19 27 34 .77 34 .36 1 .1 0 .6 Layton township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 37 39 19 21 22 36 .05 35 .97 0 .8 0 .5 Lebanon township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79 80 111 42 40 47 36 .11 35 .50 2 .2 1 .2 Little Deep township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51 49 54 23 27 29 36 .31 36 .29 1 .4 0 .6 Meadow township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 39 80 28 31 37 35 .46 30 .83 1 .4 0 .9 Mouse River township . . . . . . . . . . . 15 22 36 12 11 16 35 .97 31 .27 0 .5 0 .4 Newport township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91 125 140 50 51 55 35 .73 35 .73 2 .5 1 .4 Normal township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66 67 80 37 30 36 35 .74 35 .64 1 .9 1 .0 Northeast McHenry UT . . . . . . . . . . 98 109 (X) 54 51 (X) 108 .11 107 .66 0 .9 0 .5 North Prairie township . . . . . . . . . . . 103 89 110 47 42 40 35 .86 35 .83 2 .9 1 .3 Norwich township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 143 148 167 65 60 65 35 .72 35 .62 4 .0 1 .8 Odin township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 38 59 24 22 23 36 .15 34 .42 1 .3 0 .7 Olivia township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 51 66 20 22 26 35 .91 35 .87 1 .1 0 .6 Pratt township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 36 51 28 25 29 36 .00 35 .98 1 .4 0 .8 Riga township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79 81 91 33 31 55 36 .38 34 .87 2 .3 0 .9 Rose Hill township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 29 26 13 13 14 35 .94 35 .81 0 .5 0 .4 Round Lake township . . . . . . . . . . . 39 43 49 16 21 22 36 .07 32 .53 1 .2 0 .5 Saline township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 36 31 11 15 11 36 .27 36 .15 0 .7 0 .3 Schiller township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48 70 95 35 28 32 36 .43 35 .43 1 .4 1 .0 Spring Grove township . . . . . . . . . . . 39 40 48 26 25 25 33 .97 32 .14 1 .2 0 .8 Strege township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 56 67 27 25 31 36 .19 35 .27 1 .1 0 .8 Towner city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 533 574 669 337 335 362 0 .81 0 .81 658 .0 416 .0 Upham city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 130 155 205 112 120 134 0 .33 0 .33 393 .9 339 .4 Velva city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,084 1,049 968 493 483 486 0 .83 0 .83 1,306 .0 594 .0 Velva township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 182 182 163 65 84 64 35 .13 35 .03 5 .2 1 .9 Villard township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 36 43 19 21 26 36 .01 35 .75 0 .4 0 .5 Voltaire city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 51 63 22 21 26 0 .40 0 .40 100 .0 55 .0 Voltaire township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 38 36 18 20 24 35 .43 35 .05 0 .9 0 .5 Wagar township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 32 54 19 19 28 36 .07 36 .01 0 .8 0 .5 Willow Creek township . . . . . . . . . . . 39 40 62 19 25 33 36 .35 36 .24 1 .1 0 .5

McIntosh County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,809 3,390 4,021 1,858 1,853 2,031 994 .74 974 .73 2 .9 1 .9 Ashley city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 749 882 1,052 520 528 548 0 .63 0 .63 1,188 .9 825 .4 East McIntosh UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 278 365 454 183 185 204 360 .05 347 .57 0 .8 0 .5 Lehr city (part) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66 89 147 80 76 96 0 .11 0 .11 600 .0 727 .3 Northwest McIntosh UT . . . . . . . . . . 349 414 498 251 237 276 325 .91 321 .14 1 .1 0 .8 Roloff township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 21 38 16 13 13 34 .03 33 .88 0 .4 0 .5 Southwest McIntosh UT . . . . . . . . . . 257 333 434 181 165 193 272 .19 269 .59 1 .0 0 .7 Venturia city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 23 30 12 14 18 0 .06 0 .06 166 .7 200 .0 Wishek city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,002 1,122 1,171 516 532 569 1 .45 1 .44 695 .8 358 .3 Zeeland city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 86 141 197 99 103 114 0 .30 0 .30 286 .7 330 .0







densityHousing unit

density


McKenzie County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,360 5,737 6,383 3,090 2,719 3,178 2,860 .78 2,760 .32 2 .3 1 .1 Alex township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58 49 56 25 18 21 34 .49 34 .45 1 .7 0 .7 Alexander city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 223 217 216 120 106 115 1 .44 1 .43 155 .9 83 .9 Antelope Creek township . . . . . . . . . 15 19 18 13 13 12 35 .98 35 .95 0 .4 0 .4 Arnegard city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 115 105 122 59 60 84 0 .25 0 .25 460 .0 236 .0 Arnegard township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65 57 68 32 32 43 35 .63 35 .58 1 .8 0 .9 Blue Butte township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79 59 81 33 36 38 35 .68 34 .50 2 .3 1 .0 Central McKenzie UT . . . . . . . . . . . . 717 689 862 351 307 381 417 .38 416 .10 1 .7 0 .8 Charbon township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 35 59 22 22 32 35 .84 35 .78 1 .0 0 .6 East McKenzie UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 23 (X) 10 11 (X) 31 .59 31 .58 1 .4 0 .3 Elm Tree township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 50 60 29 29 33 43 .89 39 .03 1 .1 0 .7 Fort Berthold UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,399 1,207 (X) 516 336 (X) 161 .63 150 .14 9 .3 3 .4 Four Bears Village CDP . . . . . . . . 517 364 309 155 90 87 1 .04 1 .04 497 .1 149 .0 Mandaree CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 596 558 367 173 151 131 11 .22 11 .21 53 .2 15 .4 Grail township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 44 62 23 20 25 31 .65 31 .65 1 .2 0 .7 Hawkeye township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49 49 73 27 28 36 33 .56 33 .54 1 .5 0 .8 Keene township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 35 44 16 15 19 36 .88 36 .88 1 .1 0 .4 North McKenzie UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . 417 458 503 198 191 219 399 .55 379 .20 1 .1 0 .5 Randolph township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 15 15 15 12 17 35 .81 35 .74 0 .4 0 .4 Riverview township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 12 5 8 12 5 61 .26 43 .86 0 .3 0 .2 Sioux township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 108 113 146 61 62 77 70 .14 64 .41 1 .7 0 .9 Southeast McKenzie UT . . . . . . . . . 234 218 (X) 147 137 (X) 403 .45 401 .59 0 .6 0 .4 Southwest McKenzie UT . . . . . . . . . 271 274 284 137 139 137 687 .38 684 .12 0 .4 0 .2 Tri township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 104 (X) (X) 39 (X) (X) 124 .81 113 .82 0 .9 0 .3 Twin Valley township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 114 88 81 112 106 123 98 .73 79 .13 1 .4 1 .4 Watford City city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,744 1,435 1,784 873 790 913 1 .42 1 .40 1,245 .7 623 .6 Yellowstone township . . . . . . . . . . . . 417 409 514 224 193 317 42 .33 40 .20 10 .4 5 .6 East Fairview CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . 76 (X) (X) 48 (X) (X) 0 .38 0 .38 200 .0 126 .3

McLean County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,962 9,311 10,457 5,590 5,264 5,515 2,328 .02 2,110 .88 4 .2 2 .6 Amundsville township . . . . . . . . . . . 39 62 80 24 28 34 36 .01 35 .92 1 .1 0 .7 Andrews township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49 54 47 24 22 24 35 .79 35 .78 1 .4 0 .7 Aurena township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 21 36 16 15 19 36 .04 35 .60 0 .6 0 .4 Benedict city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66 53 52 35 27 30 0 .25 0 .25 264 .0 140 .0 Blackwater township . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 37 59 19 19 27 35 .47 35 .34 0 .8 0 .5 Blue Hill township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 22 29 15 16 23 35 .96 35 .88 0 .4 0 .4 Butte city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68 92 129 84 82 90 0 .25 0 .25 272 .0 336 .0 Butte township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 19 29 14 13 17 36 .03 35 .66 0 .4 0 .4 Byersville township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 16 39 11 13 17 36 .06 34 .81 0 .3 0 .3 Coleharbor city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79 106 88 51 56 58 0 .18 0 .18 438 .9 283 .3 Cremerville township . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 45 63 14 17 33 35 .79 35 .74 0 .8 0 .4 Deepwater township . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 29 32 15 19 23 36 .05 36 .05 0 .6 0 .4 Dogden township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 58 73 31 31 40 35 .75 35 .35 1 .3 0 .9 Douglas township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 49 53 20 22 22 35 .97 35 .72 1 .0 0 .6 East McLean UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95 102 111 120 120 144 70 .49 67 .84 1 .4 1 .8 Fort Berthold UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 563 551 (X) 337 294 (X) 303 .45 201 .42 2 .8 1 .7 White Shield CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . 336 348 274 112 108 96 3 .80 3 .80 88 .4 29 .5 Garrison city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,453 1,318 1,530 737 655 733 1 .38 1 .38 1,052 .9 534 .1 Gate township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 25 33 14 15 21 35 .90 35 .69 0 .6 0 .4 Greatstone township . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 37 50 22 22 22 36 .02 36 .01 1 .2 0 .6 Horseshoe Valley township . . . . . . . 27 39 55 87 87 20 36 .05 35 .28 0 .8 2 .5 Lake Williams township . . . . . . . . . . 59 66 82 31 34 35 35 .57 32 .40 1 .8 1 .0 Longfellow township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 31 55 16 18 22 36 .14 36 .09 1 .1 0 .4 Loquemont township . . . . . . . . . . . . 62 57 80 34 28 34 35 .94 35 .90 1 .7 0 .9 McGinnis township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58 81 89 27 28 30 36 .10 35 .42 1 .6 0 .8 Malcolm township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78 105 86 108 95 93 35 .45 26 .91 2 .9 4 .0 Max city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 334 278 301 164 150 155 0 .78 0 .78 428 .2 210 .3 Medicine Hill township . . . . . . . . . . . 45 47 68 23 23 22 35 .05 34 .23 1 .3 0 .7 Mercer city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 94 86 104 58 56 57 0 .23 0 .22 427 .3 263 .6 Mercer township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 32 38 19 22 23 35 .85 35 .10 1 .0 0 .5 North Central McLean UT . . . . . . . . 527 461 393 266 222 206 197 .31 170 .60 3 .1 1 .6 Otis township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 57 65 120 102 175 35 .81 35 .15 1 .2 3 .4 Riverdale city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 205 273 283 188 157 135 1 .35 1 .35 151 .9 139 .3 Roseglen township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 58 86 21 26 35 35 .96 35 .68 1 .0 0 .6 Rosemont township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 46 50 20 19 22 35 .99 35 .79 0 .9 0 .6 Ruso city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 6 8 3 3 5 0 .25 0 .25 16 .0 12 .0 St . Mary township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 147 152 100 177 144 105 35 .01 33 .24 4 .4 5 .3







densityHousing unit

density


McLean County—Con . Snow township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80 81 77 67 62 52 35 .47 21 .48 3 .7 3 .1 South McLean UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 700 685 765 373 338 347 377 .00 370 .58 1 .9 1 .0 Turtle Lake city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 581 580 681 340 329 364 0 .52 0 .51 1,139 .2 666 .7 Turtle Lake township . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 51 69 23 23 25 35 .96 33 .98 1 .3 0 .7 Underwood city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 778 812 976 377 381 464 0 .91 0 .91 854 .9 414 .3 Underwood UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 221 288 370 127 144 146 201 .75 181 .54 1 .2 0 .7 Victoria township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 35 41 32 28 16 35 .95 31 .16 1 .2 1 .0 Washburn city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,246 1,389 1,506 661 659 654 1 .89 1 .79 696 .1 369 .3 West McLean UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 177 195 (X) 132 126 (X) 130 .60 115 .89 1 .5 1 .1 Wilton city (part) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 550 565 552 255 241 242 0 .38 0 .38 1,447 .4 671 .1 Wise township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 59 48 238 233 228 35 .91 33 .38 1 .1 7 .1

Mercer County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,424 8,644 9,808 4,450 4,402 4,496 1,112 .49 1,042 .96 8 .1 4 .3 Beulah city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,121 3,152 3,363 1,508 1,475 1,437 2 .52 2 .49 1,253 .4 605 .6 East Mercer UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,140 1,153 1,254 815 749 727 379 .52 344 .60 3 .3 2 .4 Fort Berthold UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62 70 (X) 44 45 (X) 85 .44 57 .12 1 .1 0 .8 Golden Valley city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 182 183 239 117 124 139 0 .73 0 .73 249 .3 160 .3 Hazen city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,411 2,457 2,818 1,074 1,131 1,118 1 .27 1 .27 1,898 .4 845 .7 Pick City city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 123 166 203 132 117 129 0 .18 0 .18 683 .3 733 .3 Stanton city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 366 345 517 198 198 230 0 .48 0 .47 778 .7 421 .3 West Mercer UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 782 887 1,127 427 434 554 641 .31 635 .05 1 .2 0 .7 Zap city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 237 231 287 135 129 162 1 .05 1 .04 227 .9 129 .8

Morton County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27,471 25,303 23,700 12,079 10,587 9,467 1,945 .45 1,926 .27 14 .3 6 .3 Almont city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 122 89 117 66 63 76 2 .64 2 .64 46 .2 25 .0 Captain’s Landing township . . . . . . . 120 153 138 51 57 46 0 .43 0 .31 387 .1 164 .5 East Morton UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,806 2,611 2,609 1,175 1,009 951 1,042 .72 1,027 .68 2 .7 1 .1 Harmon CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 145 (X) (X) 49 (X) (X) 1 .57 1 .57 92 .4 31 .2 Flasher city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 232 285 317 135 155 170 0 .71 0 .70 331 .4 192 .9 Glen Ullin city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 807 865 927 416 405 437 1 .07 1 .04 776 .0 400 .0 Hebron city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 747 803 888 396 434 470 1 .49 1 .49 501 .3 265 .8 Mandan city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18,331 16,718 15,177 7,950 6,958 5,910 11 .13 11 .03 1,661 .9 720 .8 Mandan UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,339 1,603 (X) 951 577 (X) 63 .97 62 .07 37 .7 15 .3 New Salem city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 946 938 909 449 448 442 1 .47 1 .46 647 .9 307 .5 West Morton UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,021 1,238 1,245 490 481 494 819 .82 817 .86 1 .2 0 .6

Mountrail County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,673 6,631 7,021 4,119 3,438 3,675 1,941 .57 1,825 .30 4 .2 2 .3 Alger township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 34 43 26 19 18 35 .85 35 .39 1 .0 0 .7 Austin township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 34 35 15 21 17 35 .84 35 .67 1 .0 0 .4 Banner township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 39 49 18 16 19 35 .82 35 .79 0 .9 0 .5 Bicker township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 45 58 21 18 24 35 .92 35 .79 1 .0 0 .6 Big Bend township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 45 56 18 15 16 36 .54 31 .42 1 .1 0 .6 Brookbank township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 28 41 15 15 13 35 .92 35 .91 0 .9 0 .4 Burke township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 35 43 17 14 19 35 .72 35 .54 1 .1 0 .5 Clearwater township . . . . . . . . . . . . 56 23 31 54 41 53 36 .05 35 .47 1 .6 1 .5 Cottonwood township . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 37 51 20 17 21 35 .99 33 .67 1 .0 0 .6 Crane Creek township . . . . . . . . . . . 84 43 39 27 17 23 35 .98 35 .70 2 .4 0 .8 Crowfoot township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 22 27 13 16 21 35 .98 34 .70 0 .5 0 .4 Debing township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 40 56 25 20 25 35 .94 35 .63 1 .2 0 .7 Egan township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 46 66 19 22 33 36 .55 34 .00 1 .1 0 .6 Fertile township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68 63 75 25 23 30 35 .81 35 .80 1 .9 0 .7 Howie township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48 46 41 15 14 13 35 .77 26 .89 1 .8 0 .6 Idaho township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 493 163 171 81 73 82 34 .75 33 .60 14 .7 2 .4 James Hill township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 39 50 22 16 22 36 .06 31 .82 1 .0 0 .7 Kickapoo township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 12 17 10 6 10 35 .89 33 .41 0 .8 0 .3 Knife River township . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 20 23 22 12 15 35 .97 35 .69 1 .0 0 .6 Liberty township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 15 19 183 147 119 35 .70 13 .46 1 .7 13 .6 Lostwood township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 33 47 23 20 22 35 .85 34 .28 1 .2 0 .7 Lowland township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52 60 71 26 31 37 36 .08 34 .47 1 .5 0 .8 McAlmond township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 38 36 17 18 21 35 .82 35 .02 1 .0 0 .5 McGahan township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55 31 68 23 13 31 36 .50 34 .59 1 .6 0 .7 Manitou township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98 50 60 29 24 30 36 .69 36 .23 2 .7 0 .8 Model township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61 55 78 28 29 30 36 .52 36 .39 1 .7 0 .8 Mountrail township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 31 43 14 13 23 35 .88 35 .84 0 .8 0 .4 Myrtle township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 33 44 18 17 21 36 .52 36 .40 0 .6 0 .5 New Town city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,925 1,367 1,388 701 512 553 1 .28 1 .28 1,503 .9 547 .7







densityHousing unit

density


Mountrail County—Con . Oakland township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 28 33 19 15 18 35 .95 35 .17 0 .7 0 .5 Osborn township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 285 555 375 110 190 123 35 .28 30 .30 9 .4 3 .6 Osloe township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 47 54 19 18 23 35 .98 35 .08 1 .2 0 .5 Palermo city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74 77 95 67 53 60 2 .21 2 .20 33 .6 30 .5 Palermo township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 32 38 18 14 18 34 .21 33 .05 1 .0 0 .5 Parshall city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 903 981 943 364 392 403 0 .55 0 .55 1,641 .8 661 .8 Parshall township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54 55 70 32 31 31 36 .02 35 .98 1 .5 0 .9 Plaza city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 171 167 193 114 115 126 1 .14 1 .12 152 .7 101 .8 Plaza township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 46 44 24 25 24 36 .17 36 .17 1 .1 0 .7 Powers township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 20 15 23 19 34 36 .02 34 .41 1 .0 0 .7 Powers Lake township . . . . . . . . . . . 54 55 68 26 25 35 35 .87 35 .56 1 .5 0 .7 Purcell township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58 47 60 23 19 22 35 .91 35 .50 1 .6 0 .6 Rat Lake township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 28 27 10 11 12 35 .88 35 .73 0 .6 0 .3 Redmond township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 15 19 9 8 11 35 .98 33 .53 0 .1 0 .3 Ross city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 97 48 61 54 29 40 0 .28 0 .28 346 .4 192 .9 Ross township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 39 43 24 23 22 36 .32 35 .61 1 .2 0 .7 Shell township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 38 38 18 19 20 35 .97 35 .96 0 .8 0 .5 Sidonia township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 21 31 9 11 17 36 .00 34 .64 0 .4 0 .3 Sikes township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87 50 55 29 23 27 35 .98 35 .52 2 .4 0 .8 Sorkness township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 36 38 15 15 19 36 .13 35 .63 1 .0 0 .4 Southwest Mountrail UT . . . . . . . . . . 66 55 41 174 55 31 58 .26 44 .99 1 .5 3 .9 Spring Coulee township . . . . . . . . . . 39 61 72 27 30 31 35 .26 35 .15 1 .1 0 .8 Stanley city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,458 1,279 1,371 718 664 678 1 .83 1 .82 801 .1 394 .5 Stave township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 36 48 16 14 20 36 .06 33 .31 1 .0 0 .5 Van Hook township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105 42 72 348 256 215 36 .45 32 .89 3 .2 10 .6 Wayzetta township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 24 38 14 13 18 35 .97 35 .90 0 .6 0 .4 West Mountrail UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 148 114 139 220 82 150 114 .79 93 .58 1 .6 2 .4 White Earth city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80 63 73 37 27 57 1 .50 1 .50 53 .3 24 .7 White Earth township . . . . . . . . . . . . 58 45 41 33 23 29 34 .41 34 .33 1 .7 1 .0

Nelson County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,126 3,715 4,410 1,927 2,014 2,261 1,008 .82 981 .77 3 .2 2 .0 Adler township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 47 56 21 25 28 35 .98 35 .84 0 .8 0 .6 Aneta city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 222 284 314 142 155 164 0 .99 0 .99 224 .2 143 .4 Bergen township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 48 89 29 26 39 35 .90 35 .32 1 .1 0 .8 Central township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 38 63 19 24 28 36 .00 34 .83 0 .8 0 .5 Clara township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 31 41 21 22 24 36 .03 34 .63 0 .6 0 .6 Dahlen township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68 93 103 44 48 61 35 .96 35 .71 1 .9 1 .2 Dahlen CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 (X) (X) 17 (X) (X) 0 .14 0 .14 128 .6 121 .4 Dayton township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70 84 81 39 37 38 34 .85 34 .51 2 .0 1 .1 Dodds township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 51 59 24 24 25 36 .33 35 .93 1 .2 0 .7 Enterprise township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 31 58 22 20 27 36 .05 35 .19 0 .8 0 .6 Field township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 45 58 22 27 33 35 .96 35 .87 1 .2 0 .6 Forde township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 35 61 28 27 37 35 .99 35 .35 1 .0 0 .8 Hamlin township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69 80 70 34 38 36 34 .77 34 .66 2 .0 1 .0 Illinois township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70 32 34 15 19 24 36 .24 35 .02 2 .0 0 .4 Lakota city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 672 781 898 403 387 429 1 .03 1 .03 652 .4 391 .3 Lakota township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 68 79 27 32 34 35 .08 34 .18 1 .5 0 .8 Lee township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 71 88 32 44 45 35 .97 35 .80 1 .2 0 .9 Leval township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 39 48 24 25 26 35 .87 31 .78 0 .9 0 .8 McVille city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 349 470 559 247 266 281 1 .51 1 .44 242 .4 171 .5 Melvin township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 35 38 23 21 25 35 .92 34 .74 0 .8 0 .7 Michigan township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58 60 82 34 29 37 59 .72 57 .46 1 .0 0 .6 Michigan City city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 294 345 413 173 176 201 0 .53 0 .51 576 .5 339 .2 Nash township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53 55 75 28 29 29 36 .05 35 .77 1 .5 0 .8 Nesheim township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 38 49 23 23 27 35 .81 35 .74 1 .2 0 .6 Ora township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69 73 61 27 32 35 35 .11 34 .41 2 .0 0 .8 Osago township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 35 39 26 21 26 35 .60 35 .40 0 .9 0 .7 Pekin city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70 80 101 50 63 70 0 .25 0 .25 280 .0 200 .0 Petersburg city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 192 195 219 99 106 116 1 .04 1 .03 186 .4 96 .1 Petersburg township . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 42 54 23 25 27 47 .35 46 .26 0 .6 0 .5 Rubin township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 40 62 19 19 28 36 .10 34 .04 1 .1 0 .6 Rugh township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 38 51 18 20 24 35 .90 35 .79 0 .7 0 .5 Sarnia township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 66 83 41 44 60 36 .00 34 .77 1 .1 1 .2 Tolna city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 166 202 230 109 118 122 0 .76 0 .76 218 .4 143 .4 Wamduska township . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 40 48 22 20 27 35 .84 31 .09 1 .1 0 .7 Williams township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48 43 46 19 22 28 36 .35 35 .67 1 .3 0 .5







densityHousing unit

density


Oliver County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,846 2,065 2,381 905 903 968 731 .19 722 .51 2 .6 1 .3 Center city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 571 678 826 310 310 351 0 .46 0 .46 1,241 .3 673 .9 East Oliver UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 876 872 980 390 371 388 444 .15 436 .60 2 .0 0 .9 West Oliver UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 399 515 575 205 222 229 286 .58 285 .45 1 .4 0 .7

Pembina County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,413 8,585 9,238 3,859 4,115 4,294 1,121 .40 1,118 .69 6 .6 3 .4 Advance township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 130 143 205 69 70 79 35 .89 35 .87 3 .6 1 .9 Akra township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 229 252 260 103 107 105 35 .94 35 .56 6 .4 2 .9 Bathgate city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 66 75 25 28 33 0 .27 0 .27 159 .3 92 .6 Bathgate township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72 45 94 31 30 33 26 .52 26 .52 2 .7 1 .2 Beaulieu township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 155 154 205 66 60 90 36 .04 35 .95 4 .3 1 .8 Canton City city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 42 64 32 29 33 0 .14 0 .14 321 .4 228 .6 Carlisle township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100 134 163 54 66 80 71 .66 71 .66 1 .4 0 .8 Cavalier city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,302 1,537 1,508 723 750 717 0 .82 0 .82 1,587 .8 881 .7 Cavalier township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 588 652 672 258 264 264 70 .79 70 .73 8 .3 3 .6 Crystal city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 138 167 199 78 92 96 0 .65 0 .65 212 .3 120 .0 Crystal township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 73 103 32 37 41 35 .50 35 .50 1 .4 0 .9 Drayton city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 824 913 961 422 440 447 0 .65 0 .65 1,267 .7 649 .2 Drayton township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 33 47 19 26 33 35 .32 34 .88 0 .8 0 .5 Elora township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62 81 82 32 35 47 35 .77 35 .77 1 .7 0 .9 Felson township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 86 102 113 43 47 59 44 .82 44 .82 1 .9 1 .0 Gardar township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95 89 112 58 61 62 35 .90 35 .90 2 .6 1 .6 Hamilton city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61 73 74 37 40 43 0 .27 0 .27 225 .9 137 .0 Hamilton township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 53 61 30 38 35 44 .65 44 .65 0 .9 0 .7 Joliette township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67 91 118 46 50 59 70 .82 70 .04 1 .0 0 .7 La Moure township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 108 131 134 54 59 56 35 .97 35 .91 3 .0 1 .5 Lincoln township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 47 92 23 28 50 46 .62 46 .29 0 .9 0 .5 Lodema township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69 115 121 46 49 56 36 .19 36 .19 1 .9 1 .3 Midland township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71 98 133 45 57 67 69 .88 69 .85 1 .0 0 .6 Mountain city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92 133 134 42 55 57 0 .14 0 .14 657 .1 300 .0 Neche city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 371 437 434 168 188 200 0 .35 0 .35 1,060 .0 480 .0 Neche township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 73 66 21 24 37 49 .06 49 .03 0 .8 0 .4 Park township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61 67 83 31 35 41 35 .92 35 .91 1 .7 0 .9 Pembina city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 592 642 642 279 274 265 0 .77 0 .76 778 .9 367 .1 Pembina township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82 99 102 56 51 57 64 .85 64 .48 1 .3 0 .9 St . Joseph township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 94 119 164 51 63 66 44 .92 44 .88 2 .1 1 .1 St . Thomas city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 331 447 444 182 201 207 1 .06 1 .06 312 .3 171 .7 St . Thomas township . . . . . . . . . . . . 119 165 163 69 81 89 71 .93 71 .92 1 .7 1 .0 Thingvalla township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 101 121 154 58 66 83 36 .04 36 .03 2 .8 1 .6 Walhalla city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 996 1,057 1,131 515 556 552 1 .07 1 .05 948 .6 490 .5 Walhalla township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 130 134 125 61 58 55 44 .22 44 .17 2 .9 1 .4

Pierce County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,357 4,675 5,052 2,199 2,269 2,355 1,082 .33 1,018 .60 4 .3 2 .2 Alexanter township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 30 53 21 22 24 35 .88 35 .15 0 .8 0 .6 Antelope Lake township . . . . . . . . . . 30 27 31 12 14 14 36 .17 31 .74 0 .9 0 .4 Balta city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65 73 79 47 49 56 0 .25 0 .22 295 .5 213 .6 Balta township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 42 53 16 14 24 35 .68 33 .95 0 .6 0 .5 Central Pierce UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 23 29 10 12 14 36 .16 33 .26 0 .4 0 .3 Elling township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 53 76 30 37 42 36 .24 34 .22 1 .3 0 .9 Orrin CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 (X) (X) 17 (X) (X) 0 .23 0 .23 95 .7 73 .9 Elverum township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 50 72 24 27 29 35 .91 32 .15 1 .1 0 .7 Hagel township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87 97 97 48 51 57 35 .94 35 .82 2 .4 1 .3 Selz CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 (X) (X) 30 (X) (X) 0 .14 0 .14 328 .6 214 .3 Jefferson township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 56 65 18 18 22 36 .19 35 .07 1 .3 0 .5 Meyer township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92 93 97 33 34 31 36 .82 34 .05 2 .7 1 .0 Ness township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84 78 103 30 26 36 36 .74 36 .52 2 .3 0 .8 North Pierce UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 509 609 781 281 301 353 395 .26 370 .09 1 .4 0 .8 Barton CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 (X) (X) 17 (X) (X) 0 .44 0 .34 58 .8 50 .0 Reno Valley township . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 47 47 21 24 22 35 .95 34 .58 1 .1 0 .6 Rugby city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,876 2,939 2,909 1,407 1,434 1,369 1 .94 1 .94 1,482 .5 725 .3 Rush Lake township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 33 47 16 15 19 36 .11 34 .82 1 .1 0 .5 South Pierce UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 88 118 129 48 48 54 107 .93 97 .10 0 .9 0 .5 Torgerson township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62 73 87 26 26 28 35 .44 33 .18 1 .9 0 .8 Truman township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54 52 65 26 25 33 35 .82 35 .36 1 .5 0 .7 Tuscarora township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62 68 91 29 30 34 35 .87 34 .63 1 .8 0 .8 White township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49 64 61 29 32 35 35 .86 34 .59 1 .4 0 .8 Wolford city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 50 56 27 30 33 0 .16 0 .16 225 .0 168 .8







densityHousing unit

density


Ramsey County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,451 12,066 12,681 5,615 5,729 5,616 1,300 .91 1,186 .85 9 .6 4 .7 Bartlett township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71 64 92 45 41 48 36 .00 34 .69 2 .0 1 .3 Brocket city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57 65 81 38 35 43 0 .78 0 .77 74 .0 49 .4 Cato township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 27 42 9 9 18 36 .16 35 .64 0 .5 0 .3 Chain Lakes township . . . . . . . . . . . 12 20 24 8 10 18 36 .78 25 .65 0 .5 0 .3 Churchs Ferry city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 77 118 5 46 58 0 .43 0 .43 27 .9 11 .6 Coulee township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65 108 135 36 50 73 35 .51 35 .29 1 .8 1 .0 Crary city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 142 149 145 51 54 51 0 .93 0 .89 159 .6 57 .3 Creel township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,305 1,776 1,572 527 704 610 30 .20 14 .58 89 .5 36 .1 De Groat township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 36 40 14 18 23 36 .57 31 .83 0 .7 0 .4 Devils Lake city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,141 7,222 7,782 3,481 3,508 3,325 6 .51 6 .50 1,098 .6 535 .5 Dry Lake township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 59 54 20 20 23 36 .04 29 .88 1 .5 0 .7 Edmore city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 182 256 329 125 143 163 0 .27 0 .27 674 .1 463 .0 Fancher township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51 63 67 24 28 30 35 .74 35 .24 1 .4 0 .7 Freshwater township . . . . . . . . . . . . 75 81 77 31 30 32 35 .99 27 .72 2 .7 1 .1 Grand Harbor township . . . . . . . . . . 163 181 (X) 95 82 (X) 36 .03 34 .12 4 .8 2 .8 Hammer township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52 85 76 33 28 31 35 .86 35 .15 1 .5 0 .9 Hampden city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48 60 89 35 53 58 0 .17 0 .17 282 .4 205 .9 Harding township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 41 51 18 19 26 36 .53 36 .45 0 .9 0 .5 Highland Center township . . . . . . . . 43 49 66 23 27 36 36 .01 35 .80 1 .2 0 .6 Hope township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 15 29 11 12 17 35 .94 34 .21 0 .2 0 .3 Klingstrup township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 56 72 24 25 37 35 .87 35 .87 1 .3 0 .7 Lawton city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 42 63 33 38 42 1 .00 0 .92 32 .6 35 .9 Lawton township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 39 44 21 23 23 35 .29 34 .39 0 .8 0 .6 Lillehoff township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 30 50 26 22 35 35 .09 33 .68 0 .7 0 .8 Minnewaukan township . . . . . . . . . . 199 154 133 70 60 52 36 .04 34 .56 5 .8 2 .0 Morris township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53 57 66 24 22 28 36 .02 32 .98 1 .6 0 .7 Newbre township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 25 24 15 15 17 36 .13 34 .07 1 .1 0 .4 Newland township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 41 64 19 20 29 36 .06 35 .62 0 .7 0 .5 Noonan township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 47 57 16 15 19 35 .90 33 .79 0 .9 0 .5 North Creel township . . . . . . . . . . . . 426 (X) (X) 180 (X) (X) 31 .59 30 .08 14 .2 6 .0 Northfield township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 46 59 20 21 29 35 .69 34 .76 0 .8 0 .6 Odessa township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49 56 56 28 22 31 46 .21 37 .90 1 .3 0 .7 Ontario township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72 80 78 28 32 33 35 .91 33 .92 2 .1 0 .8 Overland township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 21 28 10 9 11 36 .00 35 .60 0 .4 0 .3 Pelican township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 50 63 20 20 30 26 .79 25 .79 1 .5 0 .8 Poplar Grove township . . . . . . . . . . . 218 214 (X) 130 131 (X) 35 .04 16 .22 13 .4 8 .0 Prospect township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 33 46 19 19 23 35 .99 35 .76 0 .7 0 .5 Royal township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 30 35 17 20 21 35 .98 34 .99 0 .7 0 .5 South Minnewaukan township . . . . . 225 197 72 103 88 30 41 .52 29 .09 7 .7 3 .5 Starkweather city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 117 157 197 74 89 88 0 .14 0 .14 835 .7 528 .6 Stevens township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67 66 71 29 29 29 35 .03 33 .73 2 .0 0 .9 Sullivan township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 33 48 16 20 25 36 .07 35 .53 0 .7 0 .5 Triumph township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 58 47 20 24 23 36 .60 36 .11 1 .1 0 .6 Webster township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67 100 108 44 48 53 36 .48 36 .07 1 .9 1 .2

Ransom County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,457 5,890 5,921 2,656 2,604 2,569 863 .74 862 .36 6 .3 3 .1 Aliceton township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 121 119 132 50 50 49 36 .23 36 .11 3 .4 1 .4 Alleghany township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55 60 62 24 24 27 36 .11 36 .10 1 .5 0 .7 Bale township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83 75 95 38 32 37 36 .01 36 .00 2 .3 1 .1 Big Bend township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 153 156 149 58 54 54 36 .36 36 .26 4 .2 1 .6 Casey township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90 85 87 37 33 33 36 .32 36 .29 2 .5 1 .0 Coburn township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61 59 76 26 26 27 35 .83 35 .82 1 .7 0 .7 Elliott city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 44 32 15 18 16 0 .15 0 .15 166 .7 100 .0 Elliott township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79 95 78 32 31 32 35 .78 35 .76 2 .2 0 .9 Englevale CDP (part) . . . . . . . . . . 11 (X) (X) 3 (X) (X) 0 .99 0 .99 11 .1 3 .0 Enderlin city (part) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 882 942 980 451 479 475 1 .41 1 .41 625 .5 319 .9 Fort Ransom city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77 70 111 64 44 65 0 .30 0 .30 256 .7 213 .3 Fort Ransom township . . . . . . . . . . . 96 86 85 45 38 40 35 .48 35 .46 2 .7 1 .3 Greene township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 109 126 146 49 49 53 35 .25 34 .79 3 .1 1 .4 Hanson township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69 65 96 35 31 40 35 .98 35 .96 1 .9 1 .0 Englevale CDP (part) . . . . . . . . . . 29 (X) (X) 18 (X) (X) 0 .50 0 .50 58 .0 36 .0 Island Park township . . . . . . . . . . . . 262 299 300 114 129 125 33 .89 33 .84 7 .7 3 .4 Isley township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 48 44 16 17 20 36 .11 35 .88 1 .2 0 .4 Liberty township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 118 118 132 55 52 53 34 .35 34 .34 3 .4 1 .6 Lisbon city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,154 2,292 2,177 1,090 1,017 940 2 .25 2 .25 957 .3 484 .4 Moore township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93 101 116 41 44 49 35 .71 35 .71 2 .6 1 .1







densityHousing unit

density


Ransom County—Con . Northland township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52 98 80 27 50 36 35 .78 35 .73 1 .5 0 .8 Owego township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 35 32 11 9 13 36 .06 36 .03 0 .6 0 .3 Preston township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79 90 94 40 38 44 35 .70 35 .67 2 .2 1 .1 Rosemeade township . . . . . . . . . . . 39 37 55 19 17 22 36 .28 36 .26 1 .1 0 .5 Sandoun township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66 85 70 38 39 41 36 .05 36 .05 1 .8 1 .1 McLeod CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 (X) (X) 20 (X) (X) 0 .77 0 .77 35 .1 26 .0 Scoville township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 30 37 13 13 14 18 .05 18 .05 1 .9 0 .7 Sheldon city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 116 135 149 61 71 74 0 .22 0 .22 527 .3 277 .3 Shenford township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 118 140 143 62 60 57 53 .73 53 .66 2 .2 1 .2 Springer township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59 88 82 35 36 36 35 .97 35 .92 1 .6 1 .0 Sydna township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 194 182 133 52 47 43 36 .33 36 .33 5 .3 1 .4 Tuller township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107 130 148 58 56 54 36 .02 36 .01 3 .0 1 .6

Renville County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,470 2,610 3,160 1,386 1,413 1,558 892 .75 877 .05 2 .8 1 .6 Brandon township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72 67 80 32 31 41 34 .87 34 .74 2 .1 0 .9 Callahan township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 29 56 12 17 27 35 .66 31 .52 0 .9 0 .4 Clay township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 44 42 22 21 24 35 .91 35 .86 1 .1 0 .6 Colquhoun township . . . . . . . . . . . . 63 75 97 29 32 44 43 .18 43 .17 1 .5 0 .7 Eden Valley township . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 53 59 23 26 28 43 .64 43 .50 1 .0 0 .5 Ensign township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 127 75 75 56 33 32 35 .75 35 .74 3 .6 1 .6 Fairbanks township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 52 77 23 23 32 35 .99 35 .72 1 .0 0 .6 Glenburn city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 380 374 439 183 181 182 0 .25 0 .25 1,520 .0 732 .0 Grano city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 9 9 3 5 3 0 .30 0 .30 23 .3 10 .0 Grassland township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 30 47 14 15 21 35 .72 33 .23 0 .6 0 .4 Grover township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 29 46 17 19 22 35 .84 35 .83 0 .8 0 .5 Hamerly township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 23 44 15 19 20 35 .86 35 .86 0 .7 0 .4 Hamlet township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 59 77 23 22 27 35 .94 35 .70 1 .4 0 .6 Hurley township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 52 65 26 27 29 35 .67 35 .64 1 .1 0 .7 Ivanhoe township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 46 54 21 21 33 35 .93 35 .93 0 .8 0 .6 Lockwood township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 24 23 9 9 14 35 .92 35 .60 0 .7 0 .3 Loraine city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 19 15 7 8 11 0 .25 0 .25 36 .0 28 .0 McKinney township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63 43 64 151 141 122 35 .86 35 .30 1 .8 4 .3 Mohall city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 783 812 931 372 397 427 1 .08 1 .08 725 .0 344 .4 Muskego township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 44 80 22 20 33 36 .06 31 .54 1 .2 0 .7 Plain township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 34 46 16 18 26 36 .13 35 .78 0 .8 0 .4 Prescott township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 35 37 13 12 14 36 .02 35 .95 0 .8 0 .4 Prosperity township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 38 48 18 24 24 43 .43 43 .39 0 .6 0 .4 Rockford township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47 49 81 28 28 32 35 .96 35 .94 1 .3 0 .8 Roosevelt township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 33 41 17 22 26 35 .78 33 .63 0 .7 0 .5 Sherwood city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 242 255 286 133 138 144 0 .31 0 .31 780 .6 429 .0 Stafford township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 51 56 21 24 29 43 .46 43 .36 0 .9 0 .5 Tolley city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47 63 79 40 39 47 0 .13 0 .13 361 .5 307 .7 Van Buren township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 44 59 23 21 21 36 .06 36 .02 1 .3 0 .6 White Ash township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 49 47 17 20 23 35 .80 35 .80 0 .9 0 .5

Richland County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16,321 17,998 18,148 7,503 7,575 7,394 1,445 .45 1,435 .78 11 .4 5 .2 Abercrombie city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 263 296 252 121 138 121 0 .61 0 .61 431 .1 198 .4 Abercrombie township . . . . . . . . . . . 268 285 286 118 117 119 60 .77 60 .77 4 .4 1 .9 Antelope township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 110 116 127 46 48 49 36 .02 36 .02 3 .1 1 .3 Barney city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52 69 79 28 28 27 0 .16 0 .16 325 .0 175 .0 Barney township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 134 148 143 50 48 51 35 .38 35 .38 3 .8 1 .4 Barrie township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 191 198 150 80 69 62 35 .18 35 .18 5 .4 2 .3 Belford township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 122 134 162 50 52 59 35 .68 35 .68 3 .4 1 .4 Brandenburg township . . . . . . . . . . . 102 142 127 44 50 52 35 .25 35 .25 2 .9 1 .2 Brightwood township . . . . . . . . . . . . 203 r 202 184 92 100 93 34 .67 32 .70 6 .2 2 .8 Center township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 465 512 423 178 203 148 44 .42 44 .42 10 .5 4 .0 Christine city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150 153 140 67 61 59 0 .19 0 .19 789 .5 352 .6 Colfax city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 121 91 80 48 44 39 1 .02 1 .02 118 .6 47 .1 Colfax township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 241 220 201 95 83 77 59 .11 59 .11 4 .1 1 .6 Danton township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 135 153 159 54 57 60 35 .06 35 .06 3 .9 1 .5 Devillo township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84 109 121 38 45 46 35 .98 35 .98 2 .3 1 .1 Dexter township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67 95 106 37 40 41 35 .83 35 .01 1 .9 1 .1 Duerr township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 118 135 173 60 64 77 64 .07 62 .89 1 .9 1 .0 Dwight city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82 75 83 34 36 38 0 .20 0 .20 410 .0 170 .0 Dwight township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 313 286 260 119 107 84 45 .33 45 .21 6 .9 2 .6 Eagle township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 252 247 237 105 95 102 42 .26 42 .26 6 .0 2 .5







densityHousing unit

density


Richland County—Con . Elma township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78 77 102 33 31 33 36 .47 35 .55 2 .2 0 .9 Fairmount city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 367 406 427 195 202 204 0 .32 0 .32 1,146 .9 609 .4 Fairmount township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90 111 130 42 44 50 40 .88 40 .88 2 .2 1 .0 Freeman township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 51 58 23 24 23 35 .88 35 .88 1 .1 0 .6 Garborg township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96 89 105 43 39 45 36 .05 36 .05 2 .7 1 .2 Grant township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 102 130 190 50 54 64 35 .30 33 .60 3 .0 1 .5 Great Bend city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60 118 108 38 42 47 0 .55 0 .55 109 .1 69 .1 Greendale township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 104 124 121 42 45 51 36 .27 36 .21 2 .9 1 .2 Hankinson city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 919 1,058 1,038 501 524 510 1 .59 1 .59 578 .0 315 .1 Helendale township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 104 112 108 46 44 43 35 .01 35 .01 3 .0 1 .3 Homestead township . . . . . . . . . . . . 90 127 118 35 43 42 36 .07 36 .07 2 .5 1 .0 Ibsen township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105 115 144 52 58 59 36 .24 36 .24 2 .9 1 .4 LaMars township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78 95 102 41 40 45 35 .93 35 .93 2 .2 1 .1 Liberty Grove township . . . . . . . . . . 114 100 117 45 47 53 35 .86 35 .84 3 .2 1 .3 Lidgerwood city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 652 r 781 799 417 404 431 0 .66 0 .66 987 .9 631 .8 Mantador city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64 71 77 36 37 37 0 .14 0 .14 457 .1 257 .1 Mooreton city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 197 204 193 92 95 94 0 .27 0 .27 729 .6 340 .7 Mooreton township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 117 124 120 47 49 50 35 .19 35 .14 3 .3 1 .3 Moran township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70 80 89 31 32 40 35 .55 32 .82 2 .1 0 .9 Nansen township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 86 118 112 42 48 48 36 .00 36 .00 2 .4 1 .2 Sheyenne township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51 50 62 24 23 23 35 .66 35 .64 1 .4 0 .7 Summit township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 217 247 245 93 92 102 53 .38 53 .36 4 .1 1 .7 Viking township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67 63 71 37 34 32 36 .12 36 .12 1 .9 1 .0 Wahpeton city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,766 8,586 8,751 3,482 3,492 3,317 5 .29 5 .29 1,468 .1 658 .2 Walcott city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 235 189 178 103 89 83 1 .02 1 .02 230 .4 101 .0 Walcott township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 326 338 302 124 115 120 58 .74 58 .74 5 .5 2 .1 Waldo township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 103 77 101 42 35 40 35 .35 35 .31 2 .9 1 .2 West End township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 56 52 16 20 18 36 .12 36 .12 1 .1 0 .4 Wyndmere city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 429 533 501 226 247 232 0 .88 0 .88 487 .5 256 .8 Wyndmere township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82 102 134 41 41 54 35 .47 35 .47 2 .3 1 .2

Rolette County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13,937 13,674 12,772 5,372 5,027 4,742 939 .34 903 .08 15 .4 5 .9 Dunseith city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 773 739 723 299 282 267 1 .00 1 .00 773 .0 299 .0 East Rolette UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 493 546 585 214 218 236 261 .30 254 .87 1 .9 0 .8 Kohlmeier township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 33 49 15 20 21 35 .69 35 .26 0 .8 0 .4 Maryville township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 27 49 18 14 20 36 .02 35 .73 1 .0 0 .5 Mylo city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 19 20 12 14 13 0 .91 0 .91 22 .0 13 .2 North Rolette UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,517 3,261 3,045 1,351 1,162 1,073 281 .01 261 .79 13 .4 5 .2 East Dunseith CDP . . . . . . . . . . . 500 219 260 152 60 68 5 .21 5 .13 97 .5 29 .6 Rolette city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 594 538 623 284 286 298 0 .99 0 .99 600 .0 286 .9 Rolla city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,280 1,417 1,371 619 656 647 1 .43 1 .43 895 .1 432 .9 St . John city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 341 358 368 151 154 141 0 .45 0 .45 757 .8 335 .6 Shell Valley township . . . . . . . . . . . . 449 470 426 137 128 115 36 .12 35 .58 12 .6 3 .9 Shell Valley CDP (part) . . . . . . . . . 374 395 343 109 103 90 5 .03 5 .03 74 .4 21 .7 South Rolette UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 375 419 210 169 167 86 176 .60 171 .60 2 .2 1 .0 South Valley township . . . . . . . . . . . 31 32 40 14 15 15 35 .96 35 .95 0 .9 0 .4 Turtle Mountain UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,000 5,815 4,940 2,089 1,911 1,699 71 .85 67 .53 88 .8 30 .9 Belcourt CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,078 2,440 2,458 783 856 864 6 .01 5 .81 357 .7 134 .8 Green Acres CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . 575 (X) (X) 163 (X) (X) 1 .50 1 .50 383 .3 108 .7 Shell Valley CDP (part) . . . . . . . . . 823 (X) (X) 284 (X) (X) 10 .01 9 .98 82 .5 28 .5

Sargent County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,829 4,366 4,549 2,004 2,016 2,057 866 .90 858 .51 4 .5 2 .3 Bowen township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67 98 110 33 37 36 35 .71 35 .71 1 .9 0 .9 Brampton township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59 66 93 35 38 51 36 .43 36 .38 1 .6 1 .0 Cayuga city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 61 60 26 32 39 0 .99 0 .99 27 .3 26 .3 Cogswell city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 99 165 184 73 81 105 0 .33 0 .33 300 .0 221 .2 Denver township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57 78 92 41 41 40 35 .44 34 .87 1 .6 1 .2 Dunbar township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 103 95 112 44 43 45 36 .09 36 .08 2 .9 1 .2 Forman city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 504 506 586 255 256 263 0 .71 0 .70 720 .0 364 .3 Forman township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48 69 72 29 26 33 35 .32 35 .32 1 .4 0 .8 Gwinner city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 753 717 585 370 329 246 2 .08 2 .08 362 .0 177 .9 Hall township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 130 188 165 59 73 78 36 .06 36 .02 3 .6 1 .6 De Lamere CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 (X) (X) 14 (X) (X) 0 .26 0 .26 115 .4 53 .8 Harlem township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 52 32 25 22 16 36 .08 35 .95 1 .1 0 .7 Havana city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71 94 124 47 51 61 0 .38 0 .37 191 .9 127 .0 Herman township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56 83 122 29 30 42 35 .94 35 .90 1 .6 0 .8







densityHousing unit

density


Sargent County—Con . Jackson township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 40 42 19 21 26 35 .81 35 .81 0 .9 0 .5 Kingston township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85 107 136 52 52 61 42 .32 41 .94 2 .0 1 .2 Marboe township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 39 72 20 27 28 27 .28 26 .35 1 .1 0 .8 Milnor city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 653 711 651 350 338 307 1 .01 0 .94 694 .7 372 .3 Milnor township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 97 97 111 44 42 40 34 .21 32 .64 3 .0 1 .3 Ransom township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56 78 107 31 36 44 35 .20 35 .06 1 .6 0 .9 Rutland city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 163 220 212 98 102 115 0 .38 0 .38 428 .9 257 .9 Rutland township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55 83 65 28 28 30 35 .67 35 .42 1 .6 0 .8 Sargent township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 49 75 24 23 30 35 .88 35 .88 0 .9 0 .7 Shuman township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60 79 80 32 33 40 35 .65 34 .92 1 .7 0 .9 Southwest township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 24 37 9 9 16 36 .10 36 .01 0 .5 0 .2 Taylor township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 42 44 16 21 23 36 .23 36 .03 1 .1 0 .4 Tewaukon township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54 71 76 29 29 28 39 .04 37 .50 1 .4 0 .8 Verner township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 51 58 18 21 30 35 .78 35 .38 1 .2 0 .5 Vivian township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 140 109 151 60 58 64 35 .59 35 .10 4 .0 1 .7 Weber township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73 87 104 32 37 42 40 .27 39 .73 1 .8 0 .8 Whitestone Hill township . . . . . . . . . 85 98 97 39 38 39 33 .30 33 .22 2 .6 1 .2 Willey township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100 109 94 37 42 39 35 .64 35 .50 2 .8 1 .0

Sheridan County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,321 1,710 2,148 894 924 1,061 1,005 .64 972 .38 1 .4 0 .9 Berlin township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 58 60 22 23 27 36 .05 34 .49 1 .2 0 .6 Boone township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 24 35 13 16 22 35 .92 35 .27 0 .5 0 .4 Denhoff township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 27 56 33 28 38 36 .08 34 .18 0 .9 1 .0 Denhoff CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 (X) (X) 21 (X) (X) 0 .66 0 .66 30 .3 31 .8 Edgemont township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 9 18 8 10 8 36 .25 35 .49 0 .5 0 .2 Fairview township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 8 33 4 4 12 35 .18 34 .98 0 .2 0 .1 Goodrich city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98 163 192 107 113 122 0 .29 0 .28 350 .0 382 .1 Goodrich township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 36 81 23 27 48 35 .71 33 .51 0 .9 0 .7 Highland township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 23 55 12 15 23 36 .03 35 .27 0 .5 0 .3 Lincoln Dale township . . . . . . . . . . . 27 31 38 15 17 19 35 .24 34 .99 0 .8 0 .4 McClusky city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 380 415 492 278 247 267 0 .39 0 .39 974 .4 712 .8 McClusky township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56 73 85 31 35 35 35 .73 35 .26 1 .6 0 .9 Martin city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78 96 117 43 48 56 0 .09 0 .09 866 .7 477 .8 Martin township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 72 69 30 30 30 35 .91 34 .73 1 .2 0 .9 Mauch township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 26 31 10 15 14 36 .13 32 .76 0 .2 0 .3 North Sheridan UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 292 66 74 155 29 27 328 .13 319 .48 0 .9 0 .5 Pickard township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 37 49 17 19 19 36 .04 34 .82 0 .8 0 .5 Prophets township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 38 (X) 15 17 (X) 36 .04 35 .48 0 .6 0 .4 Rosenfield township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 46 58 19 19 24 35 .92 33 .81 1 .0 0 .6 South Sheridan UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62 98 116 36 45 57 138 .56 134 .73 0 .5 0 .3 Strassburg township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 50 61 23 25 31 35 .96 32 .35 1 .1 0 .7

Sioux County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,153 4,044 3,761 1,311 1,216 1,175 1,128 .25 1,094 .09 3 .8 1 .2 Fort Yates city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 184 228 183 73 78 78 0 .06 0 .06 3,066 .7 1,216 .7 Fort Yates UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,239 2,073 1,913 641 568 517 188 .03 167 .50 13 .4 3 .8 Menz township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 29 39 15 14 19 46 .74 46 .70 0 .6 0 .3 North Sioux UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,200 1,114 926 335 287 256 323 .07 309 .95 3 .9 1 .1 Cannon Ball CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . 875 864 702 227 208 180 96 .67 88 .27 9 .9 2 .6 Porcupine CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 146 (X) (X) 40 (X) (X) 0 .20 0 .20 730 .0 200 .0 Selfridge city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 160 223 242 76 85 108 0 .27 0 .27 592 .6 281 .5 Solen city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83 86 92 44 43 42 0 .30 0 .30 276 .7 146 .7 Southwest Sioux UT . . . . . . . . . . . . 259 291 366 127 141 155 569 .77 569 .30 0 .5 0 .2

Slope County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 727 767 907 436 451 481 1,219 .16 1,214 .92 0 .6 0 .4 Amidon city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 26 24 17 17 22 0 .64 0 .64 31 .3 26 .6 Bucklin township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 9 8 8 6 5 32 .20 32 .17 0 .6 0 .2 Carroll township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 13 20 8 7 13 35 .99 35 .99 0 .3 0 .2 Cash township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 23 24 13 10 8 36 .03 35 .69 0 .9 0 .4 Cedar Creek township . . . . . . . . . . . 25 31 36 13 18 18 36 .03 35 .74 0 .7 0 .4 Central Slope UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 (X) (X) 9 (X) (X) 71 .75 71 .67 0 .3 0 .1 Connor township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 26 30 17 17 18 35 .89 35 .82 0 .8 0 .5 Crawford township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 25 31 16 10 12 35 .94 35 .89 0 .9 0 .4 Deep Creek UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 23 27 11 10 11 35 .87 35 .70 0 .6 0 .3 Harper township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 7 7 4 8 7 35 .73 35 .67 0 .1 0 .1 Hughes township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 12 11 5 6 4 35 .33 35 .10 0 .2 0 .1 Hume township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 23 25 17 16 16 35 .48 35 .48 0 .7 0 .5







densityHousing unit

density


Slope County—Con . Marmarth city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 136 140 144 93 101 99 2 .53 2 .50 54 .4 37 .2 Mineral Springs township . . . . . . . . . 23 27 37 13 15 13 35 .92 35 .89 0 .6 0 .4 Moord township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 24 17 9 10 12 35 .32 35 .28 0 .5 0 .3 Mound township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 9 13 7 10 9 35 .86 35 .79 0 .2 0 .2 Northeast Slope UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74 (X) (X) 39 (X) (X) 72 .69 72 .64 1 .0 0 .5 Northwest Slope UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51 60 74 33 28 31 195 .75 194 .34 0 .3 0 .2 Peaceful Valley township . . . . . . . . . 19 31 30 14 14 16 36 .93 36 .89 0 .5 0 .4 Rainy Butte township . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 31 29 18 18 23 35 .85 35 .85 0 .8 0 .5 Richland Center township . . . . . . . . 5 5 7 6 5 5 35 .66 35 .63 0 .1 0 .2 Sand Creek township . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 35 49 18 20 19 70 .99 70 .85 0 .5 0 .3 Sheets township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 32 46 12 14 18 35 .94 35 .83 0 .6 0 .3 West Slope UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 23 25 10 12 11 127 .06 126 .36 0 .1 0 .1 White Lake township . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 21 27 11 13 14 35 .86 35 .58 0 .6 0 .3 Woodberry township . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 24 30 15 17 18 35 .92 35 .92 0 .9 0 .4

Stark County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24,199 22,636 22,832 10,735 9,722 9,585 1,340 .19 1,334 .74 18 .1 8 .0 Belfield city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 800 866 887 418 439 455 1 .09 1 .08 740 .7 387 .0 Dickinson city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17,787 16,010 16,097 7,865 7,033 6,838 10 .03 9 .96 1,785 .8 789 .7 Dickinson North UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,616 2,506 2,315 1,055 904 813 270 .42 268 .26 9 .8 3 .9 Dickinson South UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . 516 561 601 217 206 225 205 .23 204 .95 2 .5 1 .1 East Stark UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 667 736 904 310 309 389 548 .19 545 .93 1 .2 0 .6 Gladstone city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 239 248 224 113 106 96 0 .35 0 .34 702 .9 332 .4 Richardton city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 529 619 625 285 285 290 0 .36 0 .36 1,469 .4 791 .7 South Heart city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 301 307 322 129 119 122 0 .95 0 .94 320 .2 137 .2 Taylor city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 148 150 163 96 83 99 0 .50 0 .50 296 .0 192 .0 West Stark UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 596 633 594 247 238 258 303 .06 302 .40 2 .0 0 .8

Steele County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,975 2,258 2,420 1,171 1,231 1,311 715 .46 712 .22 2 .8 1 .6 Beaver Creek township . . . . . . . . . . 77 84 114 40 40 43 35 .62 34 .70 2 .2 1 .2 Broadlawn township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 42 59 23 22 27 35 .31 35 .25 1 .2 0 .7 Carpenter township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51 45 53 23 27 26 35 .02 35 .02 1 .5 0 .7 Colgate township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93 93 98 34 40 40 35 .39 35 .39 2 .6 1 .0 Easton township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54 62 78 26 32 35 36 .05 36 .03 1 .5 0 .7 Edendale township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60 60 72 26 29 30 36 .01 36 .01 1 .7 0 .7 Enger township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 76 80 98 37 35 45 35 .80 35 .78 2 .1 1 .0 Finley city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 445 515 543 245 256 289 3 .47 3 .47 128 .2 70 .6 Finley township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52 64 65 26 27 30 32 .46 32 .39 1 .6 0 .8 Franklin township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 41 49 24 24 23 35 .99 35 .84 1 .1 0 .7 Golden Lake township . . . . . . . . . . . 59 73 68 171 172 157 36 .01 34 .85 1 .7 4 .9 Greenview township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 38 64 20 27 26 36 .03 35 .99 1 .2 0 .6 Hope city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 258 303 281 155 155 163 0 .62 0 .62 416 .1 250 .0 Hugo township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 62 61 21 22 25 35 .86 35 .86 1 .2 0 .6 Luverne city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 44 41 21 23 23 0 .26 0 .26 119 .2 80 .8 Melrose township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 63 73 22 28 31 36 .04 35 .88 1 .1 0 .6 Newburgh township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90 113 102 39 45 49 35 .75 35 .75 2 .5 1 .1 Primrose township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73 95 90 31 37 41 35 .92 35 .92 2 .0 0 .9 Riverside township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 41 55 20 22 26 36 .13 36 .05 1 .1 0 .6 Sharon city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96 109 119 73 76 79 1 .55 1 .54 62 .3 47 .4 Sharon township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48 44 44 16 18 20 33 .84 33 .81 1 .4 0 .5 Sherbrooke township . . . . . . . . . . . . 49 62 59 24 25 26 35 .98 35 .98 1 .4 0 .7 Westfield township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59 70 73 28 29 31 35 .40 35 .38 1 .7 0 .8 Willow Lake township . . . . . . . . . . . . 56 55 61 26 20 26 34 .94 34 .44 1 .6 0 .8

Stutsman County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21,100 21,908 22,241 9,862 9,817 9,770 2,297 .91 2,221 .72 9 .5 4 .4 Alexander township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 28 49 12 13 17 35 .90 35 .61 0 .7 0 .3 Ashland township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64 76 86 32 32 33 35 .41 33 .97 1 .9 0 .9 Bloom township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 554 609 511 208 189 178 34 .35 33 .78 16 .4 6 .2 Bloomenfield township . . . . . . . . . . . 34 45 51 19 16 18 36 .02 34 .28 1 .0 0 .6 Buchanan city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90 77 40 34 29 15 0 .08 0 .08 1,125 .0 425 .0 Buchanan township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 99 102 123 42 39 50 35 .87 33 .90 2 .9 1 .2 Chase Lake UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 3 6 2 1 3 35 .80 30 .95 0 .1 0 .1 Chicago township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47 54 55 24 23 25 35 .60 33 .73 1 .4 0 .7 Cleveland city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83 112 121 54 59 58 0 .18 0 .18 461 .1 300 .0 Conklin township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 12 16 6 5 8 35 .88 34 .30 0 .3 0 .2 Corinne township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 60 38 19 24 24 35 .59 35 .49 1 .2 0 .5 Corwin township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100 118 95 42 51 47 36 .03 36 .03 2 .8 1 .2 Ypsilanti CDP (part) . . . . . . . . . . . 23 (X) (X) 9 (X) (X) 0 .06 0 .06 383 .3 150 .0







densityHousing unit

density


Stutsman County—Con . Courtenay city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 53 70 26 30 40 0 .44 0 .44 102 .3 59 .1 Courtenay township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 31 58 17 18 20 35 .49 35 .24 1 .0 0 .5 Cusator township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 36 58 17 20 21 35 .57 34 .88 0 .7 0 .5 Deer Lake township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 28 30 13 14 15 35 .88 34 .45 0 .8 0 .4 Durham township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 62 77 29 28 28 35 .96 35 .45 1 .4 0 .8 Edmunds township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 43 74 21 28 35 35 .41 34 .77 1 .0 0 .6 Eldridge township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 123 154 162 64 69 66 35 .74 34 .74 3 .5 1 .8 Flint township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 66 53 20 25 23 35 .52 32 .89 1 .2 0 .6 Fried township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 155 183 177 84 71 86 36 .00 35 .33 4 .4 2 .4 Gerber township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 10 19 7 7 11 35 .68 33 .58 0 .3 0 .2 Germania township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 29 45 14 17 20 35 .94 35 .61 0 .5 0 .4 Glacier township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 29 46 14 14 19 35 .64 34 .67 0 .6 0 .4 Gray township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 41 55 18 16 22 34 .62 33 .74 1 .2 0 .5 Griffin township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51 51 68 28 27 29 36 .03 35 .91 1 .4 0 .8 Hidden township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 43 58 21 19 22 36 .02 35 .30 1 .4 0 .6 Homer township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 289 331 312 123 125 118 34 .07 34 .07 8 .5 3 .6 Iosco township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 16 15 8 8 7 35 .89 33 .60 0 .5 0 .2 Jamestown city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15,427 15,527 15,571 6,983 6,970 6,740 12 .88 12 .83 1,202 .4 544 .3 Jim River Valley township . . . . . . . . . 38 45 61 20 18 20 35 .88 34 .13 1 .1 0 .6 Kensal city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 163 161 191 83 86 93 0 .60 0 .60 271 .7 138 .3 Kensal township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 58 48 21 21 22 34 .92 32 .21 1 .4 0 .7 Lenton township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64 62 72 29 26 28 36 .19 36 .18 1 .8 0 .8 Lippert township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96 111 110 37 37 45 36 .16 35 .75 2 .7 1 .0 Lowery township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 36 48 16 19 25 35 .32 34 .21 1 .0 0 .5 Lyon township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 27 25 10 11 14 35 .85 33 .03 0 .6 0 .3 Manns township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78 61 74 33 30 30 36 .09 36 .08 2 .2 0 .9 Marstonmoor township . . . . . . . . . . . 23 26 39 12 12 15 35 .87 34 .50 0 .7 0 .3 Medina city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 308 335 387 182 209 213 1 .02 1 .02 302 .0 178 .4 Midway township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 579 636 599 276 256 253 28 .61 26 .75 21 .6 10 .3 Montpelier city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87 103 82 46 45 40 0 .18 0 .18 483 .3 255 .6 Montpelier township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70 82 76 30 31 28 35 .82 35 .82 2 .0 0 .8 Moon Lake township . . . . . . . . . . . . 65 65 78 26 25 28 35 .04 34 .34 1 .9 0 .8 Newbury township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51 61 56 21 22 26 36 .09 34 .62 1 .5 0 .6 Nogosek township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 37 43 18 17 18 35 .51 35 .04 0 .6 0 .5 Northwest Stutsman UT . . . . . . . . . . 15 26 24 9 9 10 35 .78 34 .33 0 .4 0 .3 Paris township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 23 42 16 18 21 35 .93 32 .79 0 .7 0 .5 Peterson township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 40 56 18 17 21 36 .25 34 .51 1 .0 0 .5 Pingree city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60 66 61 29 32 36 0 .18 0 .18 333 .3 161 .1 Pingree township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49 45 42 21 22 21 35 .67 34 .96 1 .4 0 .6 Pipestem Valley township . . . . . . . . . 35 38 50 24 20 30 35 .84 35 .61 1 .0 0 .7 Plainview township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 45 63 26 26 26 35 .96 35 .91 1 .1 0 .7 Rose township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73 71 76 29 24 30 36 .03 35 .08 2 .1 0 .8 Round Top township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 17 32 10 7 9 35 .83 33 .66 0 .3 0 .3 St . Paul township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71 79 71 33 27 29 35 .98 32 .22 2 .2 1 .0 Severn township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51 76 55 23 26 23 36 .16 35 .98 1 .4 0 .6 Sharlow township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55 72 70 23 24 23 36 .25 36 .21 1 .5 0 .6 Sinclair township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 33 39 15 16 17 35 .90 34 .20 0 .9 0 .4 Spiritwood township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73 103 99 42 43 43 36 .09 35 .76 2 .0 1 .2 Spiritwood CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 (X) (X) 19 (X) (X) 0 .88 0 .88 20 .5 21 .6 Spiritwood Lake city . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90 72 61 99 63 96 1 .79 1 .07 84 .1 92 .5 Stirton township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70 83 82 33 36 32 35 .87 32 .89 2 .1 1 .0 Streeter city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 170 172 161 125 125 140 0 .35 0 .35 485 .7 357 .1 Streeter township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55 63 62 36 33 33 35 .75 34 .80 1 .6 1 .0 Strong township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 28 60 16 17 31 35 .61 33 .73 0 .6 0 .5 Sydney township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78 93 92 40 42 42 36 .26 36 .13 2 .2 1 .1 Valley Spring township . . . . . . . . . . . 19 27 33 11 12 15 36 .01 33 .80 0 .6 0 .3 Wadsworth township . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 38 35 13 15 16 35 .60 32 .67 0 .7 0 .4 Walters township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 65 69 25 24 26 35 .61 35 .47 1 .2 0 .7 Weld township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 36 39 18 22 21 36 .32 33 .95 0 .9 0 .5 Windsor township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59 43 58 27 23 28 34 .95 34 .21 1 .7 0 .8 Winfield township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83 75 81 33 30 31 36 .16 36 .07 2 .3 0 .9 Woodbury township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 208 196 244 89 85 86 34 .84 34 .68 6 .0 2 .6 Woodworth city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 80 102 52 56 63 0 .22 0 .22 227 .3 236 .4 Ypsilanti township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 128 168 154 66 71 75 36 .03 36 .03 3 .6 1 .8 Ypsilanti CDP (part) . . . . . . . . . . . 81 (X) (X) 43 (X) (X) 0 .49 0 .49 165 .3 87 .8







densityHousing unit

density


Towner County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,246 2,876 3,627 1,449 1,558 1,770 1,041 .48 1,024 .56 2 .2 1 .4 Armourdale township . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 65 66 24 27 29 36 .06 35 .73 1 .3 0 .7 Atkins township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 33 52 15 16 19 36 .06 35 .11 1 .0 0 .4 Bethel township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 25 24 13 13 21 35 .95 35 .67 0 .9 0 .4 Bisbee city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 126 167 227 97 102 121 0 .26 0 .26 484 .6 373 .1 Cando city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,115 1,342 1,564 701 707 722 0 .63 0 .63 1,769 .8 1,112 .7 Cando township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81 84 119 37 40 50 35 .53 35 .12 2 .3 1 .1 Coolin township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 20 45 12 15 19 36 .04 35 .87 1 .1 0 .3 Crocus township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 54 69 24 25 29 35 .99 35 .05 1 .3 0 .7 Dash township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 45 56 22 28 35 45 .07 44 .30 0 .6 0 .5 Egeland city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 49 103 42 48 51 0 .38 0 .38 73 .7 110 .5 Gerrard township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 38 39 11 16 22 35 .87 35 .51 0 .4 0 .3 Grainfield township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 52 57 21 28 35 35 .72 35 .63 1 .0 0 .6 Hansboro city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 8 20 14 13 16 0 .19 0 .19 63 .2 73 .7 Howell township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 53 73 19 23 25 35 .99 35 .67 0 .8 0 .5 Lansing township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 7 13 5 10 18 36 .26 36 .13 0 .1 0 .1 Maza township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 21 36 17 19 20 36 .18 35 .04 0 .4 0 .5 Monroe township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 36 30 14 16 20 36 .01 35 .98 0 .8 0 .4 Mount View township . . . . . . . . . . . . 54 59 64 25 24 25 35 .84 35 .28 1 .5 0 .7 New City township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 27 34 12 13 23 35 .72 35 .69 0 .5 0 .3 Olson township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 37 58 19 22 32 35 .99 35 .03 0 .5 0 .5 Paulson township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 39 58 15 18 22 36 .06 34 .91 0 .9 0 .4 Perth city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 13 22 6 6 13 0 .13 0 .13 69 .2 46 .2 Picton township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 49 50 18 19 24 44 .33 44 .11 0 .6 0 .4 Rocklake city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 101 194 221 103 116 129 0 .22 0 .22 459 .1 468 .2 Rock Lake township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 25 36 11 15 17 35 .61 33 .41 0 .4 0 .3 Sarles city (part) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 3 3 1 2 2 0 .02 0 .02 200 .0 50 .0 Sidney township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48 53 87 22 22 30 44 .36 43 .98 1 .1 0 .5 Smith township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 17 46 11 15 23 43 .96 43 .29 0 .4 0 .3 Sorenson township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 26 46 14 16 27 35 .77 35 .11 0 .6 0 .4 Springfield township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 35 47 23 23 27 36 .07 34 .65 0 .4 0 .7 Teddy township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 43 82 20 23 28 36 .09 35 .85 1 .0 0 .6 Twin Hill township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 45 44 19 19 19 35 .81 34 .91 1 .1 0 .5 Victor township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 24 23 12 13 20 35 .60 34 .83 0 .7 0 .3 Virginia township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 21 51 9 17 21 35 .70 34 .97 0 .4 0 .3 Zion township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 62 50 21 24 30 36 .03 35 .91 1 .4 0 .6

Traill County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,121 8,477 8,752 3,780 3,708 3,770 862 .51 861 .95 9 .4 4 .4 Belmont township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 76 64 77 32 30 40 25 .01 25 .01 3 .0 1 .3 Bingham township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70 86 108 37 42 51 30 .09 30 .04 2 .3 1 .2 Blanchard township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87 84 117 41 38 46 36 .01 36 .01 2 .4 1 .1 Blanchard CDP (part) . . . . . . . . . . 26 (X) (X) 11 (X) (X) 0 .23 0 .23 113 .0 47 .8 Bloomfield township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 130 138 153 55 54 60 36 .06 36 .06 3 .6 1 .5 Blanchard CDP (part) . . . . . . . . . . – (X) (X) – (X) (X) 0 .03 0 .03 – – Bohnsack township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55 65 64 27 28 29 35 .06 35 .06 1 .6 0 .8 Buxton city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 323 350 343 144 141 143 0 .20 0 .20 1,615 .0 720 .0 Buxton township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107 112 81 42 46 36 35 .11 35 .11 3 .0 1 .2 Caledonia township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 111 132 154 54 50 62 29 .54 29 .54 3 .8 1 .8 Caledonia CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 (X) (X) 20 (X) (X) 0 .52 0 .52 75 .0 38 .5 Clifford city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 51 51 23 26 23 0 .14 0 .14 314 .3 164 .3 Eldorado township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107 132 175 51 56 68 36 .18 35 .81 3 .0 1 .4 Elm River township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 52 47 18 19 32 28 .99 28 .99 1 .1 0 .6 Ervin township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 160 165 178 75 75 76 36 .42 36 .40 4 .4 2 .1 Galesburg city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 108 157 161 64 76 82 0 .17 0 .17 635 .3 376 .5 Galesburg township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83 107 127 44 49 49 34 .97 34 .88 2 .4 1 .3 Garfield township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 169 212 170 71 75 66 34 .93 34 .93 4 .8 2 .0 Grandin city (part) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . – – – – – – 0 .02 0 .02 – – Greenfield township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72 65 56 27 26 26 35 .34 35 .34 2 .0 0 .8 Hatton city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 777 707 800 394 331 334 0 .61 0 .61 1,273 .8 645 .9 Herberg township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65 89 124 27 31 42 33 .76 33 .72 1 .9 0 .8 Hillsboro city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,603 1,563 1,488 763 727 714 1 .09 1 .09 1,470 .6 700 .0 Hillsboro township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 132 122 106 63 47 47 34 .81 34 .81 3 .8 1 .8 Kelso township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69 91 96 33 37 41 35 .07 35 .07 2 .0 0 .9 Lindaas township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 114 105 127 46 48 50 34 .89 34 .89 3 .3 1 .3 Mayville city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,858 1,953 2,092 872 876 866 1 .92 1 .92 967 .7 454 .2 Mayville township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 133 151 159 55 54 60 34 .92 34 .92 3 .8 1 .6 Morgan township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91 99 111 39 49 49 35 .94 35 .94 2 .5 1 .1







densityHousing unit

density


Traill County—Con . Norman township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74 57 77 29 28 33 35 .83 35 .83 2 .1 0 .8 Norway township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 169 155 172 67 58 70 35 .70 35 .70 4 .7 1 .9 Portland city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 606 604 602 297 286 268 0 .86 0 .86 704 .7 345 .3 Reynolds city (part) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 208 224 192 83 86 78 0 .43 0 .43 483 .7 193 .0 Roseville township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 109 127 115 42 46 48 35 .55 35 .55 3 .1 1 .2 Stavanger township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 110 125 115 44 47 48 36 .20 36 .20 3 .0 1 .2 Viking township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 169 204 170 72 78 80 34 .83 34 .83 4 .9 2 .1 Wold township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100 129 144 49 48 53 35 .85 35 .85 2 .8 1 .4

Walsh County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,119 12,389 13,840 5,498 5,757 6,093 1,294 .10 1,281 .93 8 .7 4 .3 Acton township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96 109 154 45 48 64 38 .07 37 .64 2 .6 1 .2 Adams city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 127 203 248 98 118 146 1 .02 1 .00 127 .0 98 .0 Adams township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 69 64 28 31 35 35 .01 34 .33 1 .3 0 .8 Ardoch city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67 61 49 39 41 29 0 .26 0 .26 257 .7 150 .0 Ardoch township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69 93 115 35 37 53 35 .45 34 .02 2 .0 1 .0 Cleveland township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 76 99 123 39 40 44 35 .96 35 .75 2 .1 1 .1 Conway city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 23 24 15 11 15 0 .22 0 .22 104 .5 68 .2 Dewey township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 43 48 18 20 29 36 .06 35 .61 1 .1 0 .5 Dundee township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90 107 123 58 68 64 35 .98 35 .98 2 .5 1 .6 Eden township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 56 72 23 22 27 35 .81 35 .81 1 .2 0 .6 Edinburg city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 196 252 284 125 132 137 0 .31 0 .31 632 .3 403 .2 Fairdale city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 51 76 33 38 43 0 .31 0 .31 122 .6 106 .5 Farmington township . . . . . . . . . . . . 176 177 204 81 82 101 36 .30 36 .30 4 .8 2 .2 Auburn CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48 (X) (X) 21 (X) (X) 1 .01 1 .01 47 .5 20 .8 Nash CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 (X) (X) 13 (X) (X) 1 .02 1 .02 31 .4 12 .7 Fertile township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 250 246 285 94 100 107 36 .10 36 .10 6 .9 2 .6 Fordville city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 212 266 299 121 131 138 1 .01 1 .01 209 .9 119 .8 Forest River city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 125 154 148 59 68 69 0 .50 0 .50 250 .0 118 .0 Forest River township . . . . . . . . . . . 63 100 136 31 47 49 35 .65 35 .65 1 .8 0 .9 Glenwood township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 201 213 245 98 103 109 35 .73 35 .73 5 .6 2 .7 Golden township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 101 101 131 48 47 52 36 .00 35 .80 2 .8 1 .3 Grafton city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,284 4,516 4,884 1,990 2,005 2,051 3 .40 3 .40 1,260 .0 585 .3 Grafton township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 288 327 369 118 136 126 34 .21 34 .21 8 .4 3 .4 Harriston township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 131 162 172 67 79 81 34 .35 34 .35 3 .8 2 .0 Hoople city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 242 292 310 135 148 145 0 .36 0 .36 672 .2 375 .0 Kensington township . . . . . . . . . . . . 244 262 291 108 100 96 33 .86 33 .79 7 .2 3 .2 Kinloss township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 56 75 23 25 33 35 .72 35 .32 0 .9 0 .7 Lampton township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 106 107 169 50 54 74 35 .68 35 .64 3 .0 1 .4 Lankin city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98 131 152 72 83 89 0 .35 0 .35 280 .0 205 .7 Latona township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56 55 82 30 27 33 36 .21 35 .08 1 .6 0 .9 Martin township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 114 112 114 44 43 59 34 .94 34 .16 3 .3 1 .3 Medford township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62 69 78 31 33 33 34 .94 34 .94 1 .8 0 .9 Minto city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 604 657 560 294 298 255 1 .42 1 .42 425 .4 207 .0 Norton township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69 111 115 37 42 50 35 .82 35 .71 1 .9 1 .0 Oakwood township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 228 300 304 100 107 123 33 .53 33 .53 6 .8 3 .0 Ops township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63 77 74 30 31 37 36 .02 36 .02 1 .7 0 .8 Park River city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,403 1,535 1,725 734 760 793 2 .17 2 .17 646 .5 338 .2 Perth township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52 63 84 25 29 33 35 .94 34 .70 1 .5 0 .7 Pisek city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 106 96 130 60 60 71 0 .12 0 .12 883 .3 500 .0 Prairie Centre township . . . . . . . . . . 107 111 (X) 49 58 (X) 36 .19 36 .19 3 .0 1 .4 Pulaski township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 88 106 119 39 52 64 34 .48 34 .14 2 .6 1 .1 Rushford township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85 90 124 37 40 46 36 .01 36 .01 2 .4 1 .0 St . Andrews township . . . . . . . . . . . . 52 55 68 39 37 39 36 .81 36 .34 1 .4 1 .1 Sauter township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 48 61 29 30 32 35 .99 34 .83 1 .1 0 .8 Shepherd township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 36 55 18 21 29 36 .14 34 .63 1 .1 0 .5 Silvesta township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 56 75 28 32 35 35 .92 35 .15 1 .1 0 .8 Tiber township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72 98 124 44 47 51 35 .90 35 .80 2 .0 1 .2 Vernon township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 88 92 124 40 45 49 36 .08 36 .08 2 .4 1 .1 Vesta township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 48 44 17 20 27 36 .04 35 .86 0 .9 0 .5 Walsh Centre township . . . . . . . . . . 154 156 208 69 71 90 36 .22 36 .22 4 .3 1 .9 Walshville township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 112 142 191 53 60 67 33 .53 33 .10 3 .4 1 .6

Ward County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61,675 58,795 57,921 26,744 25,097 23,585 2,055 .96 2,013 .28 30 .6 13 .3 Afton township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 609 515 506 228 201 174 35 .65 35 .49 17 .2 6 .4 Anna township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 35 37 16 17 18 36 .43 35 .12 0 .8 0 .5 Baden township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 43 48 23 22 19 35 .69 34 .75 1 .0 0 .7







densityHousing unit

density


Ward County—Con . Berthold city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 454 466 409 178 181 171 0 .37 0 .37 1,227 .0 481 .1 Berthold township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 76 58 83 33 29 38 36 .13 35 .86 2 .1 0 .9 Brillian township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57 68 43 25 27 20 36 .21 36 .20 1 .6 0 .7 Burlington city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,060 1,096 995 410 388 372 0 .64 0 .64 1,656 .3 640 .6 Burlington township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 388 356 288 153 135 106 35 .37 35 .31 11 .0 4 .3 Burt township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 102 94 90 42 40 38 36 .12 35 .69 2 .9 1 .2 Cameron township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 40 42 17 22 22 35 .52 34 .60 1 .0 0 .5 Carbondale township . . . . . . . . . . . . 47 59 64 29 33 40 35 .52 35 .51 1 .3 0 .8 Carpio city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 157 148 178 83 90 94 0 .59 0 .59 266 .1 140 .7 Carpio township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68 62 63 26 27 32 35 .75 35 .75 1 .9 0 .7 Denmark township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91 77 65 33 37 34 35 .91 33 .73 2 .7 1 .0 Des Lacs city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 204 209 216 78 76 74 0 .56 0 .53 384 .9 147 .2 Des Lacs township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85 114 90 38 45 35 35 .37 35 .10 2 .4 1 .1 Donnybrook city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59 90 106 37 46 59 0 .70 0 .70 84 .3 52 .9 Douglas city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64 64 93 40 44 45 0 .31 0 .29 220 .7 137 .9 Elmdale township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 89 64 27 35 31 35 .98 35 .52 1 .4 0 .8 Eureka township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 367 335 305 156 144 128 36 .47 35 .98 10 .2 4 .3 Ruthville CDP (part) . . . . . . . . . . . 47 (X) (X) 27 (X) (X) 0 .11 0 .11 427 .3 245 .5 Evergreen township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 6 8 3 4 5 35 .83 33 .56 0 .2 0 .1 Foxholm township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 121 91 88 66 61 60 36 .37 36 .37 3 .3 1 .8 Foxholm CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75 (X) (X) 38 (X) (X) 0 .96 0 .96 78 .1 39 .6 Freedom township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 135 127 143 61 59 60 36 .05 35 .42 3 .8 1 .7 Gasman township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 158 123 100 66 51 56 36 .16 34 .97 4 .5 1 .9 Greely township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 23 37 15 16 18 35 .85 34 .82 0 .5 0 .4 Greenbush township . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 26 44 15 19 23 35 .80 35 .80 0 .6 0 .4 Harrison township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,872 1,402 1,268 710 518 454 22 .49 22 .46 83 .3 31 .6 Hiddenwood township . . . . . . . . . . . 24 33 60 21 21 29 35 .91 35 .37 0 .7 0 .6 Hilton township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53 49 49 24 21 24 36 .22 35 .88 1 .5 0 .7 Iota Flat township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 55 85 22 26 30 36 .11 35 .38 1 .1 0 .6 Kenmare city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,096 1,081 1,214 558 553 637 1 .24 1 .24 883 .9 450 .0 Kenmare township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 104 97 106 45 42 42 34 .52 33 .31 3 .1 1 .4 Kirkelie township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 436 401 372 170 147 137 36 .45 36 .39 12 .0 4 .7 Linton township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 38 35 14 17 16 36 .01 34 .48 0 .9 0 .4 Lund township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 42 49 23 22 23 36 .00 34 .80 1 .4 0 .7 McKinley township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 140 140 152 60 56 53 36 .53 36 .48 3 .8 1 .6 Makoti city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 154 145 145 87 89 92 0 .20 0 .20 770 .0 435 .0 Mandan township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51 56 65 22 17 18 35 .86 34 .17 1 .5 0 .6 Margaret township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85 124 67 37 34 34 36 .10 36 .03 2 .4 1 .0 Maryland township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70 78 85 26 27 27 36 .30 36 .19 1 .9 0 .7 Mayland township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70 42 57 23 22 23 35 .90 35 .79 2 .0 0 .6 Minot city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40,888 36,567 34,544 18,744 16,475 15,040 17 .45 17 .43 2,345 .8 1,075 .4 Nedrose township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,252 2,149 2,077 892 821 753 32 .24 31 .56 71 .4 28 .3 Newman township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55 62 85 28 38 38 36 .08 35 .88 1 .5 0 .8 New Prairie township . . . . . . . . . . . . 237 218 221 90 75 76 36 .06 35 .98 6 .6 2 .5 Orlien township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47 47 53 26 26 26 36 .36 35 .64 1 .3 0 .7 Passport township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 51 51 18 18 21 36 .50 33 .41 1 .4 0 .5 Ree township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 30 38 13 21 24 36 .07 34 .22 0 .6 0 .4 Rice Lake township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65 53 54 173 177 166 36 .25 34 .41 1 .9 5 .0 Rolling Green township . . . . . . . . . . 85 93 96 39 38 38 35 .88 34 .12 2 .5 1 .1 Rushville township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81 97 81 30 31 38 35 .86 35 .21 2 .3 0 .9 Ryder city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85 92 121 62 67 72 0 .34 0 .33 257 .6 187 .9 Ryder township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 61 53 20 29 25 35 .51 34 .86 1 .0 0 .6 St . Marys township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52 42 51 21 20 25 36 .13 34 .89 1 .5 0 .6 Sauk Prairie township . . . . . . . . . . . 23 29 38 13 14 19 35 .87 35 .81 0 .6 0 .4 Sawyer city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 357 377 319 150 162 143 0 .48 0 .48 743 .8 312 .5 Sawyer township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 183 196 174 76 76 71 35 .55 35 .50 5 .2 2 .1 Shealy township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 41 (X) 14 16 (X) 35 .97 35 .15 0 .8 0 .4 Spencer township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47 59 100 30 36 37 35 .95 34 .97 1 .3 0 .9 Spring Lake township . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 35 36 15 14 15 35 .88 34 .71 0 .8 0 .4 Sundre township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 970 1,006 900 384 376 323 35 .96 35 .72 27 .2 10 .8 Logan CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 194 (X) (X) 79 (X) (X) 1 .47 1 .46 132 .9 54 .1 Surrey city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 934 917 856 335 313 302 0 .99 0 .98 953 .1 341 .8 Surrey township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 349 284 253 121 102 89 35 .06 35 .02 10 .0 3 .5 Tatman township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,992 4,220 6,126 1,012 1,519 1,533 36 .08 35 .92 83 .3 28 .2 Minot AFB CDP (part) . . . . . . . . . 2,766 3,986 5,866 892 1,393 1,410 2 .11 2 .00 1,383 .0 446 .0 Ruthville CDP (part) . . . . . . . . . . . 144 (X) (X) 87 (X) (X) 0 .05 0 .05 2,880 .0 1,740 .0







densityHousing unit

density


Ward County—Con . Tolgen township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 16 29 16 11 12 35 .89 33 .68 0 .9 0 .5 Torning township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64 48 54 27 27 25 36 .18 34 .40 1 .9 0 .8 Vang township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 49 57 20 21 18 35 .94 34 .28 1 .2 0 .6 Waterford township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,807 3,659 3,277 591 1,070 1,186 36 .14 35 .82 78 .4 16 .5 Minot AFB CDP (part) . . . . . . . . . 2,755 3,613 3,229 571 1,048 1,165 5 .56 5 .35 515 .0 106 .7 Willis township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 106 100 115 44 43 42 36 .08 36 .06 2 .9 1 .2

Wells County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,207 5,102 5,864 2,481 2,643 2,869 1,290 .37 1,271 .05 3 .3 2 .0 Berlin township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 38 54 17 19 26 36 .04 34 .78 0 .8 0 .5 Bilodeau township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 46 61 18 21 24 35 .78 35 .57 1 .2 0 .5 Bowdon city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 131 139 196 94 104 121 0 .25 0 .25 524 .0 376 .0 Bremen township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47 67 108 32 33 54 36 .06 35 .83 1 .3 0 .9 Bull Moose township . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 51 67 21 24 27 35 .65 33 .51 1 .0 0 .6 Cathay city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 56 54 29 37 36 0 .18 0 .18 238 .9 161 .1 Cathay township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56 63 61 29 31 35 35 .74 35 .65 1 .6 0 .8 Chaseley township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 54 68 29 37 38 35 .97 35 .16 1 .1 0 .8 Crystal Lake township . . . . . . . . . . . 32 37 45 18 19 17 35 .95 35 .52 0 .9 0 .5 Delger township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 36 52 19 21 24 35 .98 35 .77 0 .7 0 .5 Fairville township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 53 53 18 21 24 35 .39 35 .36 1 .0 0 .5 Fessenden city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 479 625 655 289 306 345 0 .45 0 .45 1,064 .4 642 .2 Forward township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80 96 105 40 42 41 36 .06 35 .57 2 .2 1 .1 Fram township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58 69 95 38 35 40 36 .00 35 .97 1 .6 1 .1 Germantown township . . . . . . . . . . . 29 35 51 19 19 23 35 .27 35 .08 0 .8 0 .5 Haaland township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 54 59 26 28 28 35 .56 35 .35 1 .3 0 .7 Hamberg city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 28 19 15 15 16 0 .40 0 .40 52 .5 37 .5 Hamburg township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 67 61 20 26 30 35 .98 35 .25 1 .1 0 .6 Harvey city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,783 1,989 2,263 997 1,056 1,060 1 .88 1 .88 948 .4 530 .3 Hawksnest township . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 38 45 12 20 18 36 .08 35 .92 0 .6 0 .3 Heimdal township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56 62 85 58 48 59 35 .98 35 .59 1 .6 1 .6 Heimdal CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 (X) (X) 33 (X) (X) 0 .47 0 .47 57 .4 70 .2 Hillsdale township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107 136 149 49 52 48 35 .88 35 .71 3 .0 1 .4 Hurdsfield city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84 91 92 61 65 71 0 .27 0 .27 311 .1 225 .9 Johnson township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 60 57 15 19 23 36 .21 35 .30 1 .0 0 .4 Lynn township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 40 35 12 13 15 36 .16 34 .71 0 .6 0 .3 Manfred township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 56 73 25 30 48 36 .03 35 .85 1 .1 0 .7 Norway Lake township . . . . . . . . . . . 46 67 88 31 30 44 35 .52 34 .64 1 .3 0 .9 Oshkosh township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56 55 55 29 29 30 34 .81 34 .75 1 .6 0 .8 Pony Gulch township . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 57 58 24 25 29 35 .12 35 .11 1 .3 0 .7 Progress township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 36 45 14 18 20 35 .86 34 .86 0 .6 0 .4 Rusland township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 37 54 21 22 23 35 .23 34 .71 1 .1 0 .6 St . Anna township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 25 34 14 15 16 34 .94 33 .29 0 .5 0 .4 Silver Lake township . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 27 33 15 14 14 36 .03 34 .83 0 .6 0 .4 South Cottonwood township . . . . . . 40 52 78 26 25 28 35 .90 35 .40 1 .1 0 .7 Speedwell township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57 68 76 35 35 49 36 .06 35 .74 1 .6 1 .0 Sykeston city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 117 153 167 85 95 102 0 .38 0 .38 307 .9 223 .7 Sykeston township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 54 54 23 25 25 35 .43 34 .92 1 .2 0 .7 Valhalla township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 32 45 19 17 33 35 .98 35 .45 0 .6 0 .5 Wells township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100 127 137 55 48 51 34 .21 33 .63 3 .0 1 .6 Western township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87 86 115 36 34 39 35 .97 35 .56 2 .4 1 .0 West Norway township . . . . . . . . . . . 35 57 73 22 27 27 36 .00 35 .83 1 .0 0 .6 West Ontario township . . . . . . . . . . . 32 49 44 19 24 26 35 .74 35 .40 0 .9 0 .5 Woodward township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 34 45 13 19 22 35 .96 35 .69 0 .6 0 .4

Williams County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22,398 19,761 21,129 10,464 9,680 10,180 2,147 .87 2,077 .40 10 .8 5 .0 Alamo city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57 51 69 41 43 46 0 .57 0 .55 103 .6 74 .5 Athens township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 28 28 13 18 17 36 .00 35 .87 0 .6 0 .4 Barr Butte township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 27 19 10 12 12 35 .81 35 .68 0 .3 0 .3 Big Meadow township . . . . . . . . . . . 27 25 31 14 20 23 35 .89 34 .89 0 .8 0 .4 Big Stone township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 32 39 17 16 25 35 .87 35 .71 0 .9 0 .5 Blacktail township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62 63 44 137 163 144 36 .07 35 .83 1 .7 3 .8 Blue Ridge township . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 32 40 20 22 26 36 .05 33 .93 1 .0 0 .6 Bonetraill township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 24 24 14 14 14 36 .01 36 .01 0 .5 0 .4 Brooklyn township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 26 35 11 15 14 35 .63 35 .62 0 .8 0 .3 Buford township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74 136 193 32 68 94 35 .48 33 .79 2 .2 0 .9 Bull Butte township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 16 23 15 18 18 51 .43 51 .32 0 .3 0 .3 Champion township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 19 20 9 10 13 35 .99 35 .87 0 .4 0 .3







densityHousing unit

density


Williams County—Con . Climax township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 20 19 15 13 15 32 .90 32 .87 0 .3 0 .5 Cow Creek UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 14 (X) 13 12 (X) 36 .37 36 .35 0 .5 0 .4 Dry Fork township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 29 36 23 17 22 35 .85 35 .82 1 .2 0 .6 Dublin township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 20 15 7 8 10 36 .02 35 .77 0 .4 0 .2 East Fork township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 15 24 11 11 13 36 .38 36 .36 0 .5 0 .3 Ellisville township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 11 29 15 14 21 35 .92 35 .80 0 .4 0 .4 Epping city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100 79 64 40 41 39 0 .38 0 .38 263 .2 105 .3 Equality township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 47 48 23 22 25 35 .19 35 .14 1 .3 0 .7 Farmvale township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 36 39 16 22 20 35 .87 35 .83 1 .0 0 .4 Golden Valley township . . . . . . . . . . 19 23 32 14 13 19 36 .09 35 .96 0 .5 0 .4 Good Luck township . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 17 32 13 12 18 35 .87 35 .86 0 .7 0 .4 Grenora city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 244 202 261 121 139 170 0 .61 0 .61 400 .0 198 .4 Grenora township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 16 22 6 6 9 32 .39 31 .49 0 .3 0 .2 Hardscrabble township . . . . . . . . . . . 86 88 88 36 32 33 50 .26 50 .25 1 .7 0 .7 Hazel township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 31 45 24 25 31 35 .57 35 .16 0 .6 0 .7 Hebron township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 23 34 18 17 27 50 .42 50 .42 0 .7 0 .4 Judson township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 130 144 164 61 55 64 35 .87 35 .85 3 .6 1 .7 Lindahl township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 38 37 21 24 27 35 .87 35 .64 1 .3 0 .6 Marshall township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51 28 43 18 19 22 36 .32 36 .32 1 .4 0 .5 Missouri Ridge township . . . . . . . . . 496 429 446 202 171 178 35 .94 35 .89 13 .8 5 .6 Mont township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 43 45 22 22 24 35 .93 35 .91 1 .3 0 .6 New Home township . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 16 30 12 15 18 35 .99 35 .98 0 .1 0 .3 Oliver township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 6 17 9 10 10 36 .01 35 .99 0 .2 0 .3 Orthell township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 12 19 9 8 14 35 .93 35 .89 0 .3 0 .3 Pherrin township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 276 291 (X) 104 113 (X) 35 .84 35 .78 7 .7 2 .9 Pleasant Valley township . . . . . . . . . 121 135 173 69 65 67 36 .34 36 .34 3 .3 1 .9 Rainbow township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 19 17 14 15 18 35 .90 35 .74 0 .4 0 .4 Ray city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 592 534 603 301 296 316 1 .04 1 .01 586 .1 298 .0 Rock Island township . . . . . . . . . . . . – 4 8 5 5 9 35 .20 34 .39 – 0 .1 Round Prairie township . . . . . . . . . . 118 125 133 54 51 56 50 .60 50 .58 2 .3 1 .1 Sauk Valley township . . . . . . . . . . . . 60 80 94 56 55 64 35 .75 35 .57 1 .7 1 .6 Scorio township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 32 54 29 39 47 35 .78 34 .96 1 .1 0 .8 Southeast Williams UT . . . . . . . . . . . 78 15 10 138 17 10 78 .60 54 .70 1 .4 2 .5 South Meadow township . . . . . . . . . 23 35 35 15 20 22 36 .00 35 .71 0 .6 0 .4 Springbrook city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 26 29 14 20 14 0 .37 0 .37 73 .0 37 .8 Springbrook township . . . . . . . . . . . 67 44 67 24 17 30 35 .07 34 .81 1 .9 0 .7 Stony Creek township . . . . . . . . . . . 558 476 474 217 180 192 63 .29 50 .38 11 .1 4 .3 Strandahl township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 21 32 14 13 19 32 .70 32 .53 0 .6 0 .4 Tioga city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,230 1,125 1,278 619 569 602 1 .39 1 .31 938 .9 472 .5 Tioga township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 104 84 137 73 40 55 34 .59 34 .44 3 .0 2 .1 Trenton township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 541 524 525 209 194 194 32 .48 30 .53 17 .7 6 .8 Truax township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 190 122 97 110 109 113 57 .10 49 .30 3 .9 2 .2 Twelve Mile township . . . . . . . . . . . . 74 80 111 49 40 71 69 .97 62 .23 1 .2 0 .8 Tyrone township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 44 49 18 23 24 36 .33 36 .33 0 .9 0 .5 View township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 44 41 19 17 17 35 .84 35 .80 0 .9 0 .5 West Bank township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52 57 68 29 27 29 36 .57 36 .57 1 .4 0 .8 Wheelock township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72 55 39 20 30 14 36 .04 36 .03 2 .0 0 .6 Wildrose city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 110 129 193 91 102 114 0 .29 0 .29 379 .3 313 .8 Williston city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14,716 12,512 13,136 6,542 5,912 6,084 7 .56 7 .50 1,962 .1 872 .3 Williston township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,307 1,193 1,204 530 445 482 26 .43 21 .76 60 .1 24 .4 Winner township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 40 45 19 22 24 36 .04 35 .82 0 .7 0 .5


This page is intentionally blank.


Table 9. Population and Housing Units: 1990 to 2010; and Area Measurements and Density: 2010[For information concerning historical counts and geographic change, see “User Notes .” For information on confidentiality, nonsampling error, and definitions, see Appendixes]

StatePlace and [in Selected States] County Subdivision


2010 2000 1990

Percent change 2000 to

2010 2010 2000 1990


2010

North Dakota . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 672,591 642,200 638,800 4 .7 317,498 r 289,678 276,340 9 .6

Abercrombie city, Richland County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 263 296 252 –11 .1 121 138 121 –12 .3Adams city, Walsh County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 127 203 248 –37 .4 98 118 146 –16 .9Alamo city, Williams County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57 51 69 11 .8 41 43 46 –4 .7Alexander city, McKenzie County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 223 217 216 2 .8 120 106 115 13 .2Alice city, Cass County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 56 62 –28 .6 21 25 30 –16 .0Almont city, Morton County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 122 89 117 37 .1 66 63 76 4 .8Alsen city, Cavalier County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 68 113 –48 .5 28 45 67 –37 .8Ambrose city, Divide County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 23 48 13 .0 29 41 47 –29 .3Amenia city, Cass County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 94 89 82 5 .6 38 35 31 8 .6Amidon city, Slope County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 26 24 –23 .1 17 17 22 –

Anamoose city, McHenry County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 227 282 277 –19 .5 140 149 161 –6 .0Aneta city, Nelson County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 222 284 314 –21 .8 142 155 164 –8 .4Antler city, Bottineau County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 47 74 –42 .6 29 44 55 –34 .1Ardoch city, Walsh County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67 61 49 9 .8 39 41 29 –4 .9Argusville city, Cass County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 475 147 161 223 .1 152 65 56 133 .8Arnegard city, McKenzie County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 115 105 122 9 .5 59 60 84 –1 .7Arthur city, Cass County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 337 402 400 –16 .2 144 140 133 2 .9Ashley city, McIntosh County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 749 882 1,052 –15 .1 520 528 548 –1 .5Auburn CDP, Walsh County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48 (X) (X) (X) 21 (X) (X) (X)Ayr city, Cass County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 23 19 –26 .1 10 13 14 –23 .1

Balfour city, McHenry County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 20 33 30 .0 18 21 35 –14 .3Balta city, Pierce County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65 73 79 –11 .0 47 49 56 –4 .1Bantry city, McHenry County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 19 16 –26 .3 8 11 22 –27 .3Barney city, Richland County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52 69 79 –24 .6 28 28 27 –Barton CDP, Pierce County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 (X) (X) (X) 17 (X) (X) (X)Bathgate city, Pembina County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 66 75 –34 .8 25 28 33 –10 .7Beach city, Golden Valley County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,019 1,116 1,205 –8 .7 601 570 614 5 .4Belcourt CDP, Rolette County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,078 2,440 2,458 –14 .8 783 856 864 –8 .5Belfield city, Stark County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 800 866 887 –7 .6 418 439 455 –4 .8Benedict city, McLean County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66 53 52 24 .5 35 27 30 29 .6

Bergen city, McHenry County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 11 15 –36 .4 10 11 9 –9 .1Berlin city, LaMoure County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 35 38 –2 .9 18 20 18 –10 .0Berthold city, Ward County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 454 466 409 –2 .6 178 181 171 –1 .7Beulah city, Mercer County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,121 3,152 3,363 –1 .0 1,508 1,475 1,437 2 .2Binford city, Griggs County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 183 201 233 –9 .0 125 120 129 4 .2Bisbee city, Towner County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 126 167 227 –24 .6 97 102 121 –4 .9Bismarck city, Burleigh County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61,272 r 55,392 49,272 10 .6 28,648 r 24,218 20,047 18 .3Blanchard CDP, Traill County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 (X) (X) (X) 11 (X) (X) (X)Bottineau city, Bottineau County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,211 2,336 2,598 –5 .4 1,085 1,114 1,164 –2 .6Bowbells city, Burke County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 336 406 498 –17 .2 223 214 258 4 .2

Bowdon city, Wells County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 131 139 196 –5 .8 94 104 121 –9 .6Bowman city, Bowman County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,650 1,600 1,741 3 .1 867 799 837 8 .5Braddock city, Emmons County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 43 56 –51 .2 24 27 31 –11 .1Briarwood city, Cass County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73 78 88 –6 .4 28 26 27 7 .7Brinsmade city, Benson County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 29 21 20 .7 20 24 17 –16 .7Brocket city, Ramsey County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57 65 81 –12 .3 38 35 43 8 .6Brooktree Park CDP, Cass County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80 (X) (X) (X) 29 (X) (X) (X)Buchanan city, Stutsman County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90 77 40 16 .9 34 29 15 17 .2Bucyrus city, Adams County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 26 22 3 .8 17 16 14 6 .3Buffalo city, Cass County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 188 209 204 –10 .0 101 105 108 –3 .8

Burlington city, Ward County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,060 1,096 995 –3 .3 410 388 372 5 .7Butte city, McLean County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68 92 129 –26 .1 84 82 90 2 .4Buxton city, Traill County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 323 350 343 –7 .7 144 141 143 2 .1Caledonia CDP, Traill County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 (X) (X) (X) 20 (X) (X) (X)Calio city, Cavalier County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 24 43 –8 .3 13 17 20 –23 .5Calvin city, Cavalier County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 26 27 –23 .1 10 19 22 –47 .4Cando city, Towner County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,115 1,342 1,564 –16 .9 701 707 722 –0 .8Cannon Ball CDP, Sioux County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 875 864 702 1 .3 227 208 180 9 .1Canton City city, Pembina County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 42 64 7 .1 32 29 33 10 .3Carpio city, Ward County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 157 148 178 6 .1 83 90 94 –7 .8

Carrington city, Foster County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,065 2,268 2,267 –9 .0 1,057 1,057 1,047 –Carson city, Grant County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 293 319 383 –8 .2 194 201 224 –3 .5Casselton city, Cass County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,329 1,855 1,601 25 .6 926 738 664 25 .5Cathay city, Wells County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 56 54 –23 .2 29 37 36 –21 .6Cavalier city, Pembina County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,302 1,537 1,508 –15 .3 723 750 717 –3 .6Cayuga city, Sargent County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 61 60 –55 .7 26 32 39 –18 .8Center city, Oliver County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 571 678 826 –15 .8 310 310 351 –Christine city, Richland County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150 153 140 –2 .0 67 61 59 9 .8Churchs Ferry city, Ramsey County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 77 118 –84 .4 5 46 58 –89 .1Cleveland city, Stutsman County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83 112 121 –25 .9 54 59 58 –8 .5


Area measurements in square miles Average per square mile of land


Total area Land area Population density Housing unit density

70,698 .32 69,000 .80 9 .7 4 .6 North Dakota

0 .61 0 .61 431 .1 198 .4 Abercrombie city, Richland County1 .02 1 .00 127 .0 98 .0 Adams city, Walsh County0 .57 0 .55 103 .6 74 .5 Alamo city, Williams County1 .44 1 .43 155 .9 83 .9 Alexander city, McKenzie County0 .96 0 .96 41 .7 21 .9 Alice city, Cass County2 .64 2 .64 46 .2 25 .0 Almont city, Morton County

29 .89 29 .36 1 .2 1 .0 Alsen city, Cavalier County1 .07 1 .07 24 .3 27 .1 Ambrose city, Divide County1 .43 1 .43 65 .7 26 .6 Amenia city, Cass County0 .64 0 .64 31 .3 26 .6 Amidon city, Slope County

0 .62 0 .61 372 .1 229 .5 Anamoose city, McHenry County0 .99 0 .99 224 .2 143 .4 Aneta city, Nelson County0 .16 0 .16 168 .8 181 .3 Antler city, Bottineau County0 .26 0 .26 257 .7 150 .0 Ardoch city, Walsh County4 .01 4 .01 118 .5 37 .9 Argusville city, Cass County0 .25 0 .25 460 .0 236 .0 Arnegard city, McKenzie County1 .52 1 .52 221 .7 94 .7 Arthur city, Cass County0 .63 0 .63 1,188 .9 825 .4 Ashley city, McIntosh County1 .01 1 .01 47 .5 20 .8 Auburn CDP, Walsh County0 .08 0 .08 212 .5 125 .0 Ayr city, Cass County

0 .49 0 .49 53 .1 36 .7 Balfour city, McHenry County0 .25 0 .22 295 .5 213 .6 Balta city, Pierce County0 .17 0 .17 82 .4 47 .1 Bantry city, McHenry County0 .16 0 .16 325 .0 175 .0 Barney city, Richland County0 .44 0 .34 58 .8 50 .0 Barton CDP, Pierce County0 .27 0 .27 159 .3 92 .6 Bathgate city, Pembina County1 .93 1 .93 528 .0 311 .4 Beach city, Golden Valley County6 .01 5 .81 357 .7 134 .8 Belcourt CDP, Rolette County1 .09 1 .08 740 .7 387 .0 Belfield city, Stark County0 .25 0 .25 264 .0 140 .0 Benedict city, McLean County

0 .74 0 .74 9 .5 13 .5 Bergen city, McHenry County0 .10 0 .10 340 .0 180 .0 Berlin city, LaMoure County0 .37 0 .37 1,227 .0 481 .1 Berthold city, Ward County2 .52 2 .49 1,253 .4 605 .6 Beulah city, Mercer County0 .35 0 .35 522 .9 357 .1 Binford city, Griggs County0 .26 0 .26 484 .6 373 .1 Bisbee city, Towner County

31 .23 30 .84 1,986 .8 928 .9 Bismarck city, Burleigh County0 .25 0 .25 104 .0 44 .0 Blanchard CDP, Traill County1 .09 1 .09 2,028 .4 995 .4 Bottineau city, Bottineau County0 .80 0 .80 420 .0 278 .8 Bowbells city, Burke County

0 .25 0 .25 524 .0 376 .0 Bowdon city, Wells County1 .53 1 .53 1,078 .4 566 .7 Bowman city, Bowman County0 .25 0 .25 84 .0 96 .0 Braddock city, Emmons County0 .15 0 .15 486 .7 186 .7 Briarwood city, Cass County0 .23 0 .23 152 .2 87 .0 Brinsmade city, Benson County0 .78 0 .77 74 .0 49 .4 Brocket city, Ramsey County0 .18 0 .18 444 .4 161 .1 Brooktree Park CDP, Cass County0 .08 0 .08 1,125 .0 425 .0 Buchanan city, Stutsman County0 .35 0 .35 77 .1 48 .6 Bucyrus city, Adams County0 .23 0 .23 817 .4 439 .1 Buffalo city, Cass County

0 .64 0 .64 1,656 .3 640 .6 Burlington city, Ward County0 .25 0 .25 272 .0 336 .0 Butte city, McLean County0 .20 0 .20 1,615 .0 720 .0 Buxton city, Traill County0 .52 0 .52 75 .0 38 .5 Caledonia CDP, Traill County8 .89 8 .15 2 .7 1 .6 Calio city, Cavalier County0 .22 0 .22 90 .9 45 .5 Calvin city, Cavalier County0 .63 0 .63 1,769 .8 1,112 .7 Cando city, Towner County

96 .67 88 .27 9 .9 2 .6 Cannon Ball CDP, Sioux County0 .14 0 .14 321 .4 228 .6 Canton City city, Pembina County0 .59 0 .59 266 .1 140 .7 Carpio city, Ward County

2 .11 2 .11 978 .7 500 .9 Carrington city, Foster County4 .02 4 .02 72 .9 48 .3 Carson city, Grant County1 .90 1 .87 1,245 .5 495 .2 Casselton city, Cass County0 .18 0 .18 238 .9 161 .1 Cathay city, Wells County0 .82 0 .82 1,587 .8 881 .7 Cavalier city, Pembina County0 .99 0 .99 27 .3 26 .3 Cayuga city, Sargent County0 .46 0 .46 1,241 .3 673 .9 Center city, Oliver County0 .19 0 .19 789 .5 352 .6 Christine city, Richland County0 .43 0 .43 27 .9 11 .6 Churchs Ferry city, Ramsey County0 .18 0 .18 461 .1 300 .0 Cleveland city, Stutsman County







70,698 .32 69,000 .80 9 .7 4 .6 North Dakota

0 .61 0 .61 431 .1 198 .4 Abercrombie city, Richland County1 .02 1 .00 127 .0 98 .0 Adams city, Walsh County0 .57 0 .55 103 .6 74 .5 Alamo city, Williams County1 .44 1 .43 155 .9 83 .9 Alexander city, McKenzie County0 .96 0 .96 41 .7 21 .9 Alice city, Cass County2 .64 2 .64 46 .2 25 .0 Almont city, Morton County

29 .89 29 .36 1 .2 1 .0 Alsen city, Cavalier County1 .07 1 .07 24 .3 27 .1 Ambrose city, Divide County1 .43 1 .43 65 .7 26 .6 Amenia city, Cass County0 .64 0 .64 31 .3 26 .6 Amidon city, Slope County

0 .62 0 .61 372 .1 229 .5 Anamoose city, McHenry County0 .99 0 .99 224 .2 143 .4 Aneta city, Nelson County0 .16 0 .16 168 .8 181 .3 Antler city, Bottineau County0 .26 0 .26 257 .7 150 .0 Ardoch city, Walsh County4 .01 4 .01 118 .5 37 .9 Argusville city, Cass County0 .25 0 .25 460 .0 236 .0 Arnegard city, McKenzie County1 .52 1 .52 221 .7 94 .7 Arthur city, Cass County0 .63 0 .63 1,188 .9 825 .4 Ashley city, McIntosh County1 .01 1 .01 47 .5 20 .8 Auburn CDP, Walsh County0 .08 0 .08 212 .5 125 .0 Ayr city, Cass County

0 .49 0 .49 53 .1 36 .7 Balfour city, McHenry County0 .25 0 .22 295 .5 213 .6 Balta city, Pierce County0 .17 0 .17 82 .4 47 .1 Bantry city, McHenry County0 .16 0 .16 325 .0 175 .0 Barney city, Richland County0 .44 0 .34 58 .8 50 .0 Barton CDP, Pierce County0 .27 0 .27 159 .3 92 .6 Bathgate city, Pembina County1 .93 1 .93 528 .0 311 .4 Beach city, Golden Valley County6 .01 5 .81 357 .7 134 .8 Belcourt CDP, Rolette County1 .09 1 .08 740 .7 387 .0 Belfield city, Stark County0 .25 0 .25 264 .0 140 .0 Benedict city, McLean County

0 .74 0 .74 9 .5 13 .5 Bergen city, McHenry County0 .10 0 .10 340 .0 180 .0 Berlin city, LaMoure County0 .37 0 .37 1,227 .0 481 .1 Berthold city, Ward County2 .52 2 .49 1,253 .4 605 .6 Beulah city, Mercer County0 .35 0 .35 522 .9 357 .1 Binford city, Griggs County0 .26 0 .26 484 .6 373 .1 Bisbee city, Towner County

31 .23 30 .84 1,986 .8 928 .9 Bismarck city, Burleigh County0 .25 0 .25 104 .0 44 .0 Blanchard CDP, Traill County1 .09 1 .09 2,028 .4 995 .4 Bottineau city, Bottineau County0 .80 0 .80 420 .0 278 .8 Bowbells city, Burke County

0 .25 0 .25 524 .0 376 .0 Bowdon city, Wells County1 .53 1 .53 1,078 .4 566 .7 Bowman city, Bowman County0 .25 0 .25 84 .0 96 .0 Braddock city, Emmons County0 .15 0 .15 486 .7 186 .7 Briarwood city, Cass County0 .23 0 .23 152 .2 87 .0 Brinsmade city, Benson County0 .78 0 .77 74 .0 49 .4 Brocket city, Ramsey County0 .18 0 .18 444 .4 161 .1 Brooktree Park CDP, Cass County0 .08 0 .08 1,125 .0 425 .0 Buchanan city, Stutsman County0 .35 0 .35 77 .1 48 .6 Bucyrus city, Adams County0 .23 0 .23 817 .4 439 .1 Buffalo city, Cass County

0 .64 0 .64 1,656 .3 640 .6 Burlington city, Ward County0 .25 0 .25 272 .0 336 .0 Butte city, McLean County0 .20 0 .20 1,615 .0 720 .0 Buxton city, Traill County0 .52 0 .52 75 .0 38 .5 Caledonia CDP, Traill County8 .89 8 .15 2 .7 1 .6 Calio city, Cavalier County0 .22 0 .22 90 .9 45 .5 Calvin city, Cavalier County0 .63 0 .63 1,769 .8 1,112 .7 Cando city, Towner County

96 .67 88 .27 9 .9 2 .6 Cannon Ball CDP, Sioux County0 .14 0 .14 321 .4 228 .6 Canton City city, Pembina County0 .59 0 .59 266 .1 140 .7 Carpio city, Ward County

2 .11 2 .11 978 .7 500 .9 Carrington city, Foster County4 .02 4 .02 72 .9 48 .3 Carson city, Grant County1 .90 1 .87 1,245 .5 495 .2 Casselton city, Cass County0 .18 0 .18 238 .9 161 .1 Cathay city, Wells County0 .82 0 .82 1,587 .8 881 .7 Cavalier city, Pembina County0 .99 0 .99 27 .3 26 .3 Cayuga city, Sargent County0 .46 0 .46 1,241 .3 673 .9 Center city, Oliver County0 .19 0 .19 789 .5 352 .6 Christine city, Richland County0 .43 0 .43 27 .9 11 .6 Churchs Ferry city, Ramsey County0 .18 0 .18 461 .1 300 .0 Cleveland city, Stutsman County



2010 2000 1990


2010 2010 2000 1990


2010

North Dakota . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 672,591 642,200 638,800 4 .7 317,498 r 289,678 276,340 9 .6

Abercrombie city, Richland County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 263 296 252 –11 .1 121 138 121 –12 .3Adams city, Walsh County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 127 203 248 –37 .4 98 118 146 –16 .9Alamo city, Williams County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57 51 69 11 .8 41 43 46 –4 .7Alexander city, McKenzie County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 223 217 216 2 .8 120 106 115 13 .2Alice city, Cass County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 56 62 –28 .6 21 25 30 –16 .0Almont city, Morton County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 122 89 117 37 .1 66 63 76 4 .8Alsen city, Cavalier County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 68 113 –48 .5 28 45 67 –37 .8Ambrose city, Divide County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 23 48 13 .0 29 41 47 –29 .3Amenia city, Cass County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 94 89 82 5 .6 38 35 31 8 .6Amidon city, Slope County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 26 24 –23 .1 17 17 22 –

Anamoose city, McHenry County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 227 282 277 –19 .5 140 149 161 –6 .0Aneta city, Nelson County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 222 284 314 –21 .8 142 155 164 –8 .4Antler city, Bottineau County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 47 74 –42 .6 29 44 55 –34 .1Ardoch city, Walsh County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67 61 49 9 .8 39 41 29 –4 .9Argusville city, Cass County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 475 147 161 223 .1 152 65 56 133 .8Arnegard city, McKenzie County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 115 105 122 9 .5 59 60 84 –1 .7Arthur city, Cass County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 337 402 400 –16 .2 144 140 133 2 .9Ashley city, McIntosh County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 749 882 1,052 –15 .1 520 528 548 –1 .5Auburn CDP, Walsh County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48 (X) (X) (X) 21 (X) (X) (X)Ayr city, Cass County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 23 19 –26 .1 10 13 14 –23 .1

Balfour city, McHenry County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 20 33 30 .0 18 21 35 –14 .3Balta city, Pierce County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65 73 79 –11 .0 47 49 56 –4 .1Bantry city, McHenry County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 19 16 –26 .3 8 11 22 –27 .3Barney city, Richland County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52 69 79 –24 .6 28 28 27 –Barton CDP, Pierce County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 (X) (X) (X) 17 (X) (X) (X)Bathgate city, Pembina County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 66 75 –34 .8 25 28 33 –10 .7Beach city, Golden Valley County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,019 1,116 1,205 –8 .7 601 570 614 5 .4Belcourt CDP, Rolette County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,078 2,440 2,458 –14 .8 783 856 864 –8 .5Belfield city, Stark County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 800 866 887 –7 .6 418 439 455 –4 .8Benedict city, McLean County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66 53 52 24 .5 35 27 30 29 .6

Bergen city, McHenry County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 11 15 –36 .4 10 11 9 –9 .1Berlin city, LaMoure County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 35 38 –2 .9 18 20 18 –10 .0Berthold city, Ward County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 454 466 409 –2 .6 178 181 171 –1 .7Beulah city, Mercer County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,121 3,152 3,363 –1 .0 1,508 1,475 1,437 2 .2Binford city, Griggs County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 183 201 233 –9 .0 125 120 129 4 .2Bisbee city, Towner County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 126 167 227 –24 .6 97 102 121 –4 .9Bismarck city, Burleigh County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61,272 r 55,392 49,272 10 .6 28,648 r 24,218 20,047 18 .3Blanchard CDP, Traill County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 (X) (X) (X) 11 (X) (X) (X)Bottineau city, Bottineau County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,211 2,336 2,598 –5 .4 1,085 1,114 1,164 –2 .6Bowbells city, Burke County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 336 406 498 –17 .2 223 214 258 4 .2

Bowdon city, Wells County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 131 139 196 –5 .8 94 104 121 –9 .6Bowman city, Bowman County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,650 1,600 1,741 3 .1 867 799 837 8 .5Braddock city, Emmons County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 43 56 –51 .2 24 27 31 –11 .1Briarwood city, Cass County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73 78 88 –6 .4 28 26 27 7 .7Brinsmade city, Benson County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 29 21 20 .7 20 24 17 –16 .7Brocket city, Ramsey County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57 65 81 –12 .3 38 35 43 8 .6Brooktree Park CDP, Cass County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80 (X) (X) (X) 29 (X) (X) (X)Buchanan city, Stutsman County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90 77 40 16 .9 34 29 15 17 .2Bucyrus city, Adams County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 26 22 3 .8 17 16 14 6 .3Buffalo city, Cass County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 188 209 204 –10 .0 101 105 108 –3 .8

Burlington city, Ward County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,060 1,096 995 –3 .3 410 388 372 5 .7Butte city, McLean County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68 92 129 –26 .1 84 82 90 2 .4Buxton city, Traill County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 323 350 343 –7 .7 144 141 143 2 .1Caledonia CDP, Traill County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 (X) (X) (X) 20 (X) (X) (X)Calio city, Cavalier County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 24 43 –8 .3 13 17 20 –23 .5Calvin city, Cavalier County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 26 27 –23 .1 10 19 22 –47 .4Cando city, Towner County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,115 1,342 1,564 –16 .9 701 707 722 –0 .8Cannon Ball CDP, Sioux County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 875 864 702 1 .3 227 208 180 9 .1Canton City city, Pembina County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 42 64 7 .1 32 29 33 10 .3Carpio city, Ward County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 157 148 178 6 .1 83 90 94 –7 .8

Carrington city, Foster County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,065 2,268 2,267 –9 .0 1,057 1,057 1,047 –Carson city, Grant County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 293 319 383 –8 .2 194 201 224 –3 .5Casselton city, Cass County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,329 1,855 1,601 25 .6 926 738 664 25 .5Cathay city, Wells County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 56 54 –23 .2 29 37 36 –21 .6Cavalier city, Pembina County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,302 1,537 1,508 –15 .3 723 750 717 –3 .6Cayuga city, Sargent County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 61 60 –55 .7 26 32 39 –18 .8Center city, Oliver County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 571 678 826 –15 .8 310 310 351 –Christine city, Richland County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150 153 140 –2 .0 67 61 59 9 .8Churchs Ferry city, Ramsey County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 77 118 –84 .4 5 46 58 –89 .1Cleveland city, Stutsman County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83 112 121 –25 .9 54 59 58 –8 .5





2010 2000 1990


2010 2010 2000 1990


2010

Clifford city, Traill County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 51 51 –13 .7 23 26 23 –11 .5Cogswell city, Sargent County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 99 165 184 –40 .0 73 81 105 –9 .9Coleharbor city, McLean County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79 106 88 –25 .5 51 56 58 –8 .9Colfax city, Richland County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 121 91 80 33 .0 48 44 39 9 .1Columbus city, Burke County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 133 151 223 –11 .9 130 142 160 –8 .5Conway city, Walsh County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 23 24 – 15 11 15 36 .4Cooperstown city, Griggs County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 984 1,053 1,247 –6 .6 543 563 595 –3 .6Courtenay city, Stutsman County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 53 70 –15 .1 26 30 40 –13 .3Crary city, Ramsey County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 142 149 145 –4 .7 51 54 51 –5 .6Crosby city, Divide County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,070 1,089 1,312 –1 .7 613 637 687 –3 .8

Crystal city, Pembina County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 138 167 199 –17 .4 78 92 96 –15 .2Dahlen CDP, Nelson County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 (X) (X) (X) 17 (X) (X) (X)Davenport city, Cass County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 252 261 218 –3 .4 96 92 78 4 .3Dawson city, Kidder County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61 75 78 –18 .7 54 52 50 3 .8Dazey city, Barnes County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 104 91 129 14 .3 56 47 52 19 .1Deering city, McHenry County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98 118 99 –16 .9 44 50 59 –12 .0De Lamere CDP, Sargent County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 (X) (X) (X) 14 (X) (X) (X)Denhoff CDP, Sheridan County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 (X) (X) (X) 21 (X) (X) (X)Des Lacs city, Ward County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 204 209 216 –2 .4 78 76 74 2 .6Devils Lake city, Ramsey County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,141 7,222 7,782 –1 .1 3,481 3,508 3,325 –0 .8

Dickey city, LaMoure County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 57 53 –26 .3 31 31 31 –Dickinson city, Stark County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17,787 16,010 16,097 11 .1 7,865 7,033 6,838 11 .8Dodge city, Dunn County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87 125 135 –30 .4 67 73 74 –8 .2Donnybrook city, Ward County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59 90 106 –34 .4 37 46 59 –19 .6Douglas city, Ward County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64 64 93 – 40 44 45 –9 .1Drake city, McHenry County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 275 322 361 –14 .6 200 201 228 –0 .5Drayton city, Pembina County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 824 913 961 –9 .7 422 440 447 –4 .1Driscoll CDP, Burleigh County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82 (X) (X) (X) 44 (X) (X) (X)Dunn Center city, Dunn County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 146 122 128 19 .7 80 81 80 –1 .2Dunseith city, Rolette County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 773 739 723 4 .6 299 282 267 6 .0

Dwight city, Richland County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82 75 83 9 .3 34 36 38 –5 .6East Dunseith CDP, Rolette County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 500 219 260 128 .3 152 60 68 153 .3East Fairview CDP, McKenzie County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 76 (X) (X) (X) 48 (X) (X) (X)Edgeley city, LaMoure County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 563 637 680 –11 .6 313 336 340 –6 .8Edinburg city, Walsh County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 196 252 284 –22 .2 125 132 137 –5 .3Edmore city, Ramsey County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 182 256 329 –28 .9 125 143 163 –12 .6Egeland city, Towner County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 49 103 –42 .9 42 48 51 –12 .5Elgin city, Grant County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 642 659 765 –2 .6 416 379 415 9 .8Ellendale city, Dickey County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,394 1,559 1,798 –10 .6 698 750 765 –6 .9Elliott city, Ransom County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 44 32 –43 .2 15 18 16 –16 .7

Embden CDP, Cass County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59 (X) (X) (X) 26 (X) (X) (X)Emerado city, Grand Forks County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 414 510 483 –18 .8 233 328 277 –29 .0Enderlin city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 886 947 997 –6 .4 454 481 480 –5 .6 Cass County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 5 17 –20 .0 3 2 5 50 .0 Ransom County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 882 942 980 –6 .4 451 479 475 –5 .8Englevale CDP, Ransom County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 (X) (X) (X) 21 (X) (X) (X)Epping city, Williams County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100 79 64 26 .6 40 41 39 –2 .4Erie CDP, Cass County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 65 (X) –23 .1 26 35 (X) –25 .7Esmond city, Benson County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100 159 196 –37 .1 106 114 126 –7 .0Fairdale city, Walsh County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 51 76 –25 .5 33 38 43 –13 .2

Fairmount city, Richland County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 367 406 427 –9 .6 195 202 204 –3 .5Fargo city, Cass County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105,549 90,599 74,084 16 .5 49,956 41,200 31,704 21 .3Fessenden city, Wells County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 479 625 655 –23 .4 289 306 345 –5 .6Fingal city, Barnes County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 97 133 138 –27 .1 57 62 69 –8 .1Finley city, Steele County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 445 515 543 –13 .6 245 256 289 –4 .3Flasher city, Morton County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 232 285 317 –18 .6 135 155 170 –12 .9Flaxton city, Burke County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66 73 121 –9 .6 69 77 99 –10 .4Forbes city, Dickey County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53 64 72 –17 .2 41 39 44 5 .1Fordville city, Walsh County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 212 266 299 –20 .3 121 131 138 –7 .6Forest River city, Walsh County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 125 154 148 –18 .8 59 68 69 –13 .2

Forman city, Sargent County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 504 506 586 –0 .4 255 256 263 –0 .4Fort Ransom city, Ransom County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77 70 111 10 .0 64 44 65 45 .5Fort Totten CDP, Benson County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,243 952 867 30 .6 295 255 241 15 .7Fortuna city, Divide County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 31 53 –29 .0 26 39 46 –33 .3Fort Yates city, Sioux County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 184 228 183 –19 .3 73 78 78 –6 .4Four Bears Village CDP, McKenzie County . . . . . . . . . . . 517 364 309 42 .0 155 90 87 72 .2Foxholm CDP, Ward County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75 (X) (X) (X) 38 (X) (X) (X)Fredonia city, Logan County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 51 66 –9 .8 37 30 37 23 .3Frontier city, Cass County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 214 273 218 –21 .6 76 78 57 –2 .6Fullerton city, Dickey County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54 85 94 –36 .5 39 39 41 –

Gackle city, Logan County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 310 335 450 –7 .5 211 212 221 –0 .5Galesburg city, Traill County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 108 157 161 –31 .2 64 76 82 –15 .8Gardena city, Bottineau County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 38 41 –23 .7 21 21 28 –





0 .14 0 .14 314 .3 164 .3 Clifford city, Traill County0 .33 0 .33 300 .0 221 .2 Cogswell city, Sargent County0 .18 0 .18 438 .9 283 .3 Coleharbor city, McLean County1 .02 1 .02 118 .6 47 .1 Colfax city, Richland County0 .27 0 .27 492 .6 481 .5 Columbus city, Burke County0 .22 0 .22 104 .5 68 .2 Conway city, Walsh County0 .97 0 .97 1,014 .4 559 .8 Cooperstown city, Griggs County0 .44 0 .44 102 .3 59 .1 Courtenay city, Stutsman County0 .93 0 .89 159 .6 57 .3 Crary city, Ramsey County1 .37 1 .37 781 .0 447 .4 Crosby city, Divide County

0 .65 0 .65 212 .3 120 .0 Crystal city, Pembina County0 .14 0 .14 128 .6 121 .4 Dahlen CDP, Nelson County0 .27 0 .27 933 .3 355 .6 Davenport city, Cass County0 .34 0 .34 179 .4 158 .8 Dawson city, Kidder County0 .38 0 .38 273 .7 147 .4 Dazey city, Barnes County0 .07 0 .07 1,400 .0 628 .6 Deering city, McHenry County0 .26 0 .26 115 .4 53 .8 De Lamere CDP, Sargent County0 .66 0 .66 30 .3 31 .8 Denhoff CDP, Sheridan County0 .56 0 .53 384 .9 147 .2 Des Lacs city, Ward County6 .51 6 .50 1,098 .6 535 .5 Devils Lake city, Ramsey County

0 .22 0 .22 190 .9 140 .9 Dickey city, LaMoure County10 .03 9 .96 1,785 .8 789 .7 Dickinson city, Stark County

0 .47 0 .47 185 .1 142 .6 Dodge city, Dunn County0 .70 0 .70 84 .3 52 .9 Donnybrook city, Ward County0 .31 0 .29 220 .7 137 .9 Douglas city, Ward County2 .02 1 .97 139 .6 101 .5 Drake city, McHenry County0 .65 0 .65 1,267 .7 649 .2 Drayton city, Pembina County0 .58 0 .58 141 .4 75 .9 Driscoll CDP, Burleigh County0 .39 0 .39 374 .4 205 .1 Dunn Center city, Dunn County1 .00 1 .00 773 .0 299 .0 Dunseith city, Rolette County

0 .20 0 .20 410 .0 170 .0 Dwight city, Richland County5 .21 5 .13 97 .5 29 .6 East Dunseith CDP, Rolette County0 .38 0 .38 200 .0 126 .3 East Fairview CDP, McKenzie County0 .75 0 .75 750 .7 417 .3 Edgeley city, LaMoure County0 .31 0 .31 632 .3 403 .2 Edinburg city, Walsh County0 .27 0 .27 674 .1 463 .0 Edmore city, Ramsey County0 .38 0 .38 73 .7 110 .5 Egeland city, Towner County1 .05 1 .05 611 .4 396 .2 Elgin city, Grant County1 .52 1 .52 917 .1 459 .2 Ellendale city, Dickey County0 .15 0 .15 166 .7 100 .0 Elliott city, Ransom County

0 .72 0 .72 81 .9 36 .1 Embden CDP, Cass County0 .31 0 .31 1,335 .5 751 .6 Emerado city, Grand Forks County1 .44 1 .44 615 .3 315 .3 Enderlin city0 .03 0 .03 133 .3 100 .0 Cass County1 .41 1 .41 625 .5 319 .9 Ransom County1 .49 1 .49 26 .8 14 .1 Englevale CDP, Ransom County0 .38 0 .38 263 .2 105 .3 Epping city, Williams County2 .01 2 .01 24 .9 12 .9 Erie CDP, Cass County0 .46 0 .46 217 .4 230 .4 Esmond city, Benson County0 .31 0 .31 122 .6 106 .5 Fairdale city, Walsh County

0 .32 0 .32 1,146 .9 609 .4 Fairmount city, Richland County48 .82 48 .82 2,162 .0 1,023 .3 Fargo city, Cass County

0 .45 0 .45 1,064 .4 642 .2 Fessenden city, Wells County0 .42 0 .42 231 .0 135 .7 Fingal city, Barnes County3 .47 3 .47 128 .2 70 .6 Finley city, Steele County0 .71 0 .70 331 .4 192 .9 Flasher city, Morton County0 .28 0 .28 235 .7 246 .4 Flaxton city, Burke County0 .25 0 .25 212 .0 164 .0 Forbes city, Dickey County1 .01 1 .01 209 .9 119 .8 Fordville city, Walsh County0 .50 0 .50 250 .0 118 .0 Forest River city, Walsh County

0 .71 0 .70 720 .0 364 .3 Forman city, Sargent County0 .30 0 .30 256 .7 213 .3 Fort Ransom city, Ransom County8 .84 8 .60 144 .5 34 .3 Fort Totten CDP, Benson County1 .01 1 .00 22 .0 26 .0 Fortuna city, Divide County0 .06 0 .06 3,066 .7 1,216 .7 Fort Yates city, Sioux County1 .04 1 .04 497 .1 149 .0 Four Bears Village CDP, McKenzie County0 .96 0 .96 78 .1 39 .6 Foxholm CDP, Ward County0 .24 0 .24 191 .7 154 .2 Fredonia city, Logan County0 .19 0 .19 1,126 .3 400 .0 Frontier city, Cass County0 .39 0 .39 138 .5 100 .0 Fullerton city, Dickey County

0 .56 0 .54 574 .1 390 .7 Gackle city, Logan County0 .17 0 .17 635 .3 376 .5 Galesburg city, Traill County0 .32 0 .32 90 .6 65 .6 Gardena city, Bottineau County







0 .14 0 .14 314 .3 164 .3 Clifford city, Traill County0 .33 0 .33 300 .0 221 .2 Cogswell city, Sargent County0 .18 0 .18 438 .9 283 .3 Coleharbor city, McLean County1 .02 1 .02 118 .6 47 .1 Colfax city, Richland County0 .27 0 .27 492 .6 481 .5 Columbus city, Burke County0 .22 0 .22 104 .5 68 .2 Conway city, Walsh County0 .97 0 .97 1,014 .4 559 .8 Cooperstown city, Griggs County0 .44 0 .44 102 .3 59 .1 Courtenay city, Stutsman County0 .93 0 .89 159 .6 57 .3 Crary city, Ramsey County1 .37 1 .37 781 .0 447 .4 Crosby city, Divide County

0 .65 0 .65 212 .3 120 .0 Crystal city, Pembina County0 .14 0 .14 128 .6 121 .4 Dahlen CDP, Nelson County0 .27 0 .27 933 .3 355 .6 Davenport city, Cass County0 .34 0 .34 179 .4 158 .8 Dawson city, Kidder County0 .38 0 .38 273 .7 147 .4 Dazey city, Barnes County0 .07 0 .07 1,400 .0 628 .6 Deering city, McHenry County0 .26 0 .26 115 .4 53 .8 De Lamere CDP, Sargent County0 .66 0 .66 30 .3 31 .8 Denhoff CDP, Sheridan County0 .56 0 .53 384 .9 147 .2 Des Lacs city, Ward County6 .51 6 .50 1,098 .6 535 .5 Devils Lake city, Ramsey County

0 .22 0 .22 190 .9 140 .9 Dickey city, LaMoure County10 .03 9 .96 1,785 .8 789 .7 Dickinson city, Stark County0 .47 0 .47 185 .1 142 .6 Dodge city, Dunn County0 .70 0 .70 84 .3 52 .9 Donnybrook city, Ward County0 .31 0 .29 220 .7 137 .9 Douglas city, Ward County2 .02 1 .97 139 .6 101 .5 Drake city, McHenry County0 .65 0 .65 1,267 .7 649 .2 Drayton city, Pembina County0 .58 0 .58 141 .4 75 .9 Driscoll CDP, Burleigh County0 .39 0 .39 374 .4 205 .1 Dunn Center city, Dunn County1 .00 1 .00 773 .0 299 .0 Dunseith city, Rolette County

0 .20 0 .20 410 .0 170 .0 Dwight city, Richland County5 .21 5 .13 97 .5 29 .6 East Dunseith CDP, Rolette County0 .38 0 .38 200 .0 126 .3 East Fairview CDP, McKenzie County0 .75 0 .75 750 .7 417 .3 Edgeley city, LaMoure County0 .31 0 .31 632 .3 403 .2 Edinburg city, Walsh County0 .27 0 .27 674 .1 463 .0 Edmore city, Ramsey County0 .38 0 .38 73 .7 110 .5 Egeland city, Towner County1 .05 1 .05 611 .4 396 .2 Elgin city, Grant County1 .52 1 .52 917 .1 459 .2 Ellendale city, Dickey County0 .15 0 .15 166 .7 100 .0 Elliott city, Ransom County

0 .72 0 .72 81 .9 36 .1 Embden CDP, Cass County0 .31 0 .31 1,335 .5 751 .6 Emerado city, Grand Forks County1 .44 1 .44 615 .3 315 .3 Enderlin city0 .03 0 .03 133 .3 100 .0 Cass County1 .41 1 .41 625 .5 319 .9 Ransom County1 .49 1 .49 26 .8 14 .1 Englevale CDP, Ransom County0 .38 0 .38 263 .2 105 .3 Epping city, Williams County2 .01 2 .01 24 .9 12 .9 Erie CDP, Cass County0 .46 0 .46 217 .4 230 .4 Esmond city, Benson County0 .31 0 .31 122 .6 106 .5 Fairdale city, Walsh County

0 .32 0 .32 1,146 .9 609 .4 Fairmount city, Richland County48 .82 48 .82 2,162 .0 1,023 .3 Fargo city, Cass County0 .45 0 .45 1,064 .4 642 .2 Fessenden city, Wells County0 .42 0 .42 231 .0 135 .7 Fingal city, Barnes County3 .47 3 .47 128 .2 70 .6 Finley city, Steele County0 .71 0 .70 331 .4 192 .9 Flasher city, Morton County0 .28 0 .28 235 .7 246 .4 Flaxton city, Burke County0 .25 0 .25 212 .0 164 .0 Forbes city, Dickey County1 .01 1 .01 209 .9 119 .8 Fordville city, Walsh County0 .50 0 .50 250 .0 118 .0 Forest River city, Walsh County

0 .71 0 .70 720 .0 364 .3 Forman city, Sargent County0 .30 0 .30 256 .7 213 .3 Fort Ransom city, Ransom County8 .84 8 .60 144 .5 34 .3 Fort Totten CDP, Benson County1 .01 1 .00 22 .0 26 .0 Fortuna city, Divide County0 .06 0 .06 3,066 .7 1,216 .7 Fort Yates city, Sioux County1 .04 1 .04 497 .1 149 .0 Four Bears Village CDP, McKenzie County0 .96 0 .96 78 .1 39 .6 Foxholm CDP, Ward County0 .24 0 .24 191 .7 154 .2 Fredonia city, Logan County0 .19 0 .19 1,126 .3 400 .0 Frontier city, Cass County0 .39 0 .39 138 .5 100 .0 Fullerton city, Dickey County

0 .56 0 .54 574 .1 390 .7 Gackle city, Logan County0 .17 0 .17 635 .3 376 .5 Galesburg city, Traill County0 .32 0 .32 90 .6 65 .6 Gardena city, Bottineau County



2010 2000 1990


2010 2010 2000 1990


2010

Clifford city, Traill County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 51 51 –13 .7 23 26 23 –11 .5Cogswell city, Sargent County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 99 165 184 –40 .0 73 81 105 –9 .9Coleharbor city, McLean County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79 106 88 –25 .5 51 56 58 –8 .9Colfax city, Richland County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 121 91 80 33 .0 48 44 39 9 .1Columbus city, Burke County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 133 151 223 –11 .9 130 142 160 –8 .5Conway city, Walsh County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 23 24 – 15 11 15 36 .4Cooperstown city, Griggs County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 984 1,053 1,247 –6 .6 543 563 595 –3 .6Courtenay city, Stutsman County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 53 70 –15 .1 26 30 40 –13 .3Crary city, Ramsey County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 142 149 145 –4 .7 51 54 51 –5 .6Crosby city, Divide County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,070 1,089 1,312 –1 .7 613 637 687 –3 .8

Crystal city, Pembina County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 138 167 199 –17 .4 78 92 96 –15 .2Dahlen CDP, Nelson County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 (X) (X) (X) 17 (X) (X) (X)Davenport city, Cass County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 252 261 218 –3 .4 96 92 78 4 .3Dawson city, Kidder County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61 75 78 –18 .7 54 52 50 3 .8Dazey city, Barnes County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 104 91 129 14 .3 56 47 52 19 .1Deering city, McHenry County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98 118 99 –16 .9 44 50 59 –12 .0De Lamere CDP, Sargent County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 (X) (X) (X) 14 (X) (X) (X)Denhoff CDP, Sheridan County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 (X) (X) (X) 21 (X) (X) (X)Des Lacs city, Ward County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 204 209 216 –2 .4 78 76 74 2 .6Devils Lake city, Ramsey County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,141 7,222 7,782 –1 .1 3,481 3,508 3,325 –0 .8

Dickey city, LaMoure County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 57 53 –26 .3 31 31 31 –Dickinson city, Stark County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17,787 16,010 16,097 11 .1 7,865 7,033 6,838 11 .8Dodge city, Dunn County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87 125 135 –30 .4 67 73 74 –8 .2Donnybrook city, Ward County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59 90 106 –34 .4 37 46 59 –19 .6Douglas city, Ward County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64 64 93 – 40 44 45 –9 .1Drake city, McHenry County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 275 322 361 –14 .6 200 201 228 –0 .5Drayton city, Pembina County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 824 913 961 –9 .7 422 440 447 –4 .1Driscoll CDP, Burleigh County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82 (X) (X) (X) 44 (X) (X) (X)Dunn Center city, Dunn County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 146 122 128 19 .7 80 81 80 –1 .2Dunseith city, Rolette County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 773 739 723 4 .6 299 282 267 6 .0

Dwight city, Richland County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82 75 83 9 .3 34 36 38 –5 .6East Dunseith CDP, Rolette County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 500 219 260 128 .3 152 60 68 153 .3East Fairview CDP, McKenzie County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 76 (X) (X) (X) 48 (X) (X) (X)Edgeley city, LaMoure County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 563 637 680 –11 .6 313 336 340 –6 .8Edinburg city, Walsh County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 196 252 284 –22 .2 125 132 137 –5 .3Edmore city, Ramsey County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 182 256 329 –28 .9 125 143 163 –12 .6Egeland city, Towner County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 49 103 –42 .9 42 48 51 –12 .5Elgin city, Grant County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 642 659 765 –2 .6 416 379 415 9 .8Ellendale city, Dickey County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,394 1,559 1,798 –10 .6 698 750 765 –6 .9Elliott city, Ransom County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 44 32 –43 .2 15 18 16 –16 .7

Embden CDP, Cass County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59 (X) (X) (X) 26 (X) (X) (X)Emerado city, Grand Forks County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 414 510 483 –18 .8 233 328 277 –29 .0Enderlin city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 886 947 997 –6 .4 454 481 480 –5 .6 Cass County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 5 17 –20 .0 3 2 5 50 .0 Ransom County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 882 942 980 –6 .4 451 479 475 –5 .8Englevale CDP, Ransom County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 (X) (X) (X) 21 (X) (X) (X)Epping city, Williams County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100 79 64 26 .6 40 41 39 –2 .4Erie CDP, Cass County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 65 (X) –23 .1 26 35 (X) –25 .7Esmond city, Benson County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100 159 196 –37 .1 106 114 126 –7 .0Fairdale city, Walsh County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 51 76 –25 .5 33 38 43 –13 .2

Fairmount city, Richland County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 367 406 427 –9 .6 195 202 204 –3 .5Fargo city, Cass County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105,549 90,599 74,084 16 .5 49,956 41,200 31,704 21 .3Fessenden city, Wells County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 479 625 655 –23 .4 289 306 345 –5 .6Fingal city, Barnes County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 97 133 138 –27 .1 57 62 69 –8 .1Finley city, Steele County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 445 515 543 –13 .6 245 256 289 –4 .3Flasher city, Morton County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 232 285 317 –18 .6 135 155 170 –12 .9Flaxton city, Burke County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66 73 121 –9 .6 69 77 99 –10 .4Forbes city, Dickey County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53 64 72 –17 .2 41 39 44 5 .1Fordville city, Walsh County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 212 266 299 –20 .3 121 131 138 –7 .6Forest River city, Walsh County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 125 154 148 –18 .8 59 68 69 –13 .2

Forman city, Sargent County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 504 506 586 –0 .4 255 256 263 –0 .4Fort Ransom city, Ransom County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77 70 111 10 .0 64 44 65 45 .5Fort Totten CDP, Benson County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,243 952 867 30 .6 295 255 241 15 .7Fortuna city, Divide County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 31 53 –29 .0 26 39 46 –33 .3Fort Yates city, Sioux County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 184 228 183 –19 .3 73 78 78 –6 .4Four Bears Village CDP, McKenzie County . . . . . . . . . . . 517 364 309 42 .0 155 90 87 72 .2Foxholm CDP, Ward County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75 (X) (X) (X) 38 (X) (X) (X)Fredonia city, Logan County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 51 66 –9 .8 37 30 37 23 .3Frontier city, Cass County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 214 273 218 –21 .6 76 78 57 –2 .6Fullerton city, Dickey County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54 85 94 –36 .5 39 39 41 –

Gackle city, Logan County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 310 335 450 –7 .5 211 212 221 –0 .5Galesburg city, Traill County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 108 157 161 –31 .2 64 76 82 –15 .8Gardena city, Bottineau County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 38 41 –23 .7 21 21 28 –





2010 2000 1990


2010 2010 2000 1990


2010

Gardner city, Cass County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Garrison city, McLean County . . . . . . . . . . . .Gascoyne city, Bowman County . . . . . . . . . .Gilby city, Grand Forks County . . . . . . . . . . .Gladstone city, Stark County . . . . . . . . . . . . .Glenburn city, Renville County . . . . . . . . . . . .Glenfield city, Foster County . . . . . . . . . . . . .Glen Ullin city, Morton County . . . . . . . . . . . .Golden Valley city, Mercer County . . . . . . . . .Golva city, Golden Valley County . . . . . . . . . .

Goodrich city, Sheridan County . . . . . . . . . . .Grace City city, Foster County . . . . . . . . . . . .Grafton city, Walsh County . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Grand Forks city, Grand Forks County . . . . .Grand Forks AFB CDP, Grand Forks County Grandin city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cass County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Traill County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Grano city, Renville County . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Granville city, McHenry County . . . . . . . . . . .

Great Bend city, Richland County . . . . . . . . .Green Acres CDP, Rolette County . . . . . . . . .Grenora city, Williams County . . . . . . . . . . . .Gwinner city, Sargent County . . . . . . . . . . . .Hague city, Emmons County . . . . . . . . . . . . .Halliday city, Dunn County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Hamberg city, Wells County . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Hamilton city, Pembina County . . . . . . . . . . .Hampden city, Ramsey County . . . . . . . . . . .Hankinson city, Richland County . . . . . . . . . .

Hannaford city, Griggs County . . . . . . . . . . . .Hannah city, Cavalier County . . . . . . . . . . . .Hansboro city, Towner County . . . . . . . . . . . .Harmon CDP, Morton County . . . . . . . . . . . .Harvey city, Wells County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Harwood city, Cass County . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Hatton city, Traill County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Havana city, Sargent County . . . . . . . . . . . . .Haynes city, Adams County . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Hazelton city, Emmons County . . . . . . . . . . .

Hazen city, Mercer County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Hebron city, Morton County . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Heil CDP, Grant County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Heimdal CDP, Wells County . . . . . . . . . . . . .Hettinger city, Adams County . . . . . . . . . . . .Hillsboro city, Traill County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Hoople city, Walsh County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Hope city, Steele County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Horace city, Cass County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Hunter city, Cass County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Hurdsfield city, Wells County . . . . . . . . . . . . .Inkster city, Grand Forks County . . . . . . . . . .Jamestown city, Stutsman County . . . . . . . . .Jessie CDP, Griggs County . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Jud city, LaMoure County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Karlsruhe city, McHenry County . . . . . . . . . .Kathryn city, Barnes County . . . . . . . . . . . . .Kenmare city, Ward County . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Kensal city, Stutsman County . . . . . . . . . . . .Kief city, McHenry County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Killdeer city, Dunn County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Kindred city, Cass County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Knox city, Benson County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Kramer city, Bottineau County . . . . . . . . . . . .Kulm city, LaMoure County . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Lakota city, Nelson County . . . . . . . . . . . . . .LaMoure city, LaMoure County . . . . . . . . . . .Landa city, Bottineau County . . . . . . . . . . . . .Langdon city, Cavalier County . . . . . . . . . . . .Lankin city, Walsh County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Lansford city, Bottineau County . . . . . . . . . . .Larimore city, Grand Forks County . . . . . . . .Larson CDP, Burke County . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

741,453

1623723938091

80718261

9863

4,28452,8382,367

173173

–7

241

6057524475371

188216148

919

1311512

1451,783

7187777123

235

2,4117471527

1,2261,603

242258

2,430261

8450

15,42725728252

1,09616313

7516922529

35467288938

1,87898

2451,346

12

r

801,318

23243248374134865183106

16371

4,51649,3664,832

181181

–9

286

118(X)

20271791

227287360

1,058

181208

(X)1,989

6077079419

237

2,457803(X)(X)

1,3071,563

292303915326

91102

15,527(X)76

11963

1,08116113

7136145944

42278194428

2,101131

2531,433

17

851,530

22262224439118927239101

192108

4,88449,4179,343

213213

–9

236

108(X)

261585109288197489

1,038

2044920(X)

2,26359080012437

240

2,818888(X)(X)

1,5741,488

310281662341

9295

15,571(X)84

14372

1,21419124

7225694551

51489897038

2,241152

2491,464

26

–7 .510 .2

–30 .4–2 .5–3 .61 .6

–32 .1–6 .7–0 .5

–42 .5

–39 .9–11 .3–5 .17 .0

–51 .0–4 .4–4 .4

––22 .2–15 .7

–49 .2(X)

20 .85 .0

–22 .0–17 .2–25 .0–16 .4–20 .0–13 .1

–27 .6–25 .050 .0

(X)–10 .418 .39 .9

–24 .521 .1–0 .8

–1 .9–7 .0

(X)(X)

–6 .22 .6

–17 .1–14 .9165 .6–19 .9

–7 .7–51 .0–0 .6

(X)–5 .3

–31 .1–17 .5

1 .41 .2

–

5 .312 .7

–57 .6–34 .1–16 .1–14 .0–5 .835 .7

–10 .6–25 .2

–3 .2–6 .1

–29 .4

3573710

11011318357

41611752

10736

1,99023,449

8077777–3

135

3816312137051

135153735

501

79141449

9972483944716

126

1,0743961133

704763135155826138

6150

6,98314506137

5588312

3422892641

24840343622

1,05772

12862314

r

3965515

11410618159

40512471

11339

2,00520,8731,516

8080–5

141

42(X)

13932953

155154053

524

852413(X)

1,0562013315115

129

1,131434(X)(X)

720727148155311160

6555

6,970(X)517043

5538618

3512672843

25138743328

1,17883

13162013

42733

12117

96182

62437139

62

12249

2,05119,5862,618

7777

–3

142

47(X)

170246

59182

164358

510

924916(X)

1,060172334

6116

126

1,118470(X)(X)

769714145163216168

7166

6,740(X)537646

6379321

367246

2546

283429430

291,109

89

130654

13

–10 .312 .5

–33 .3–3 .5

6 .61 .1

–3 .42 .7

–5 .6–26 .8

–5 .3–7 .7–0 .712 .3

–46 .8–3 .8–3 .8

––40 .0

–4 .3

–9 .5(X)

–12 .912 .5–3 .8

–12 .9–

–7 .5–34 .0

–4 .4

–7 .1–41 .7

7 .7(X)

–5 .623 .419 .0–7 .8

6 .7–2 .3

–5 .0–8 .8

(X)(X)

–2 .25 .0

–8 .8–

165 .6–13 .8

–6 .2–9 .1

0 .2(X)

–2 .0–12 .9–14 .0

0 .9–3 .5

–33 .3

–2 .68 .2

–7 .1–4 .7–1 .2

4 .10 .7

–21 .4–10 .3–13 .3

–2 .30 .57 .7





0 .50 0 .50 148 .0 70 .0 Gardner city, Cass County1 .38 1 .38 1,052 .9 534 .1 Garrison city, McLean County1 .00 1 .00 16 .0 10 .0 Gascoyne city, Bowman County0 .17 0 .17 1,394 .1 647 .1 Gilby city, Grand Forks County0 .35 0 .34 702 .9 332 .4 Gladstone city, Stark County0 .25 0 .25 1,520 .0 732 .0 Glenburn city, Renville County0 .14 0 .14 650 .0 407 .1 Glenfield city, Foster County1 .07 1 .04 776 .0 400 .0 Glen Ullin city, Morton County0 .73 0 .73 249 .3 160 .3 Golden Valley city, Mercer County0 .33 0 .33 184 .8 157 .6 Golva city, Golden Valley County

0 .29 0 .28 350 .0 382 .1 Goodrich city, Sheridan County0 .40 0 .40 157 .5 90 .0 Grace City city, Foster County3 .40 3 .40 1,260 .0 585 .3 Grafton city, Walsh County

20 .09 19 .90 2,655 .2 1,178 .3 Grand Forks city, Grand Forks County8 .13 8 .13 291 .1 99 .3 Grand Forks AFB CDP, Grand Forks County0 .17 0 .17 1,017 .6 452 .9 Grandin city0 .15 0 .15 1,153 .3 513 .3 Cass County0 .02 0 .02 – – Traill County0 .30 0 .30 23 .3 10 .0 Grano city, Renville County0 .28 0 .27 892 .6 500 .0 Granville city, McHenry County

0 .55 0 .55 109 .1 69 .1 Great Bend city, Richland County1 .50 1 .50 383 .3 108 .7 Green Acres CDP, Rolette County0 .61 0 .61 400 .0 198 .4 Grenora city, Williams County2 .08 2 .08 362 .0 177 .9 Gwinner city, Sargent County0 .27 0 .27 263 .0 188 .9 Hague city, Emmons County0 .46 0 .46 408 .7 293 .5 Halliday city, Dunn County0 .40 0 .40 52 .5 37 .5 Hamberg city, Wells County0 .27 0 .27 225 .9 137 .0 Hamilton city, Pembina County0 .17 0 .17 282 .4 205 .9 Hampden city, Ramsey County1 .59 1 .59 578 .0 315 .1 Hankinson city, Richland County

0 .22 0 .22 595 .5 359 .1 Hannaford city, Griggs County0 .19 0 .19 78 .9 73 .7 Hannah city, Cavalier County0 .19 0 .19 63 .2 73 .7 Hansboro city, Towner County1 .57 1 .57 92 .4 31 .2 Harmon CDP, Morton County1 .88 1 .88 948 .4 530 .3 Harvey city, Wells County1 .27 1 .26 569 .8 196 .8 Harwood city, Cass County0 .61 0 .61 1,273 .8 645 .9 Hatton city, Traill County0 .38 0 .37 191 .9 127 .0 Havana city, Sargent County0 .14 0 .14 164 .3 114 .3 Haynes city, Adams County0 .36 0 .36 652 .8 350 .0 Hazelton city, Emmons County

1 .27 1 .27 1,898 .4 845 .7 Hazen city, Mercer County1 .49 1 .49 501 .3 265 .8 Hebron city, Morton County0 .20 0 .20 75 .0 55 .0 Heil CDP, Grant County0 .47 0 .47 57 .4 70 .2 Heimdal CDP, Wells County0 .86 0 .85 1,442 .4 828 .2 Hettinger city, Adams County1 .09 1 .09 1,470 .6 700 .0 Hillsboro city, Traill County0 .36 0 .36 672 .2 375 .0 Hoople city, Walsh County0 .62 0 .62 416 .1 250 .0 Hope city, Steele County

10 .77 10 .77 225 .6 76 .7 Horace city, Cass County1 .53 1 .51 172 .8 91 .4 Hunter city, Cass County

0 .27 0 .27 311 .1 225 .9 Hurdsfield city, Wells County1 .00 1 .00 50 .0 50 .0 Inkster city, Grand Forks County

12 .88 12 .83 1,202 .4 544 .3 Jamestown city, Stutsman County0 .47 0 .47 53 .2 29 .8 Jessie CDP, Griggs County0 .25 0 .25 288 .0 200 .0 Jud city, LaMoure County0 .75 0 .75 109 .3 81 .3 Karlsruhe city, McHenry County0 .59 0 .59 88 .1 62 .7 Kathryn city, Barnes County1 .24 1 .24 883 .9 450 .0 Kenmare city, Ward County0 .60 0 .60 271 .7 138 .3 Kensal city, Stutsman County1 .24 1 .22 10 .7 9 .8 Kief city, McHenry County

0 .94 0 .94 798 .9 363 .8 Killdeer city, Dunn County1 .45 1 .45 477 .2 199 .3 Kindred city, Cass County0 .50 0 .50 50 .0 52 .0 Knox city, Benson County0 .15 0 .15 193 .3 273 .3 Kramer city, Bottineau County0 .38 0 .38 931 .6 652 .6 Kulm city, LaMoure County1 .03 1 .03 652 .4 391 .3 Lakota city, Nelson County1 .32 1 .32 673 .5 330 .3 LaMoure city, LaMoure County0 .08 0 .08 475 .0 275 .0 Landa city, Bottineau County1 .68 1 .65 1,138 .2 640 .6 Langdon city, Cavalier County0 .35 0 .35 280 .0 205 .7 Lankin city, Walsh County

0 .35 0 .35 700 .0 365 .7 Lansford city, Bottineau County0 .59 0 .59 2,281 .4 1,055 .9 Larimore city, Grand Forks County0 .41 0 .41 29 .3 34 .1 Larson CDP, Burke County







0 .50 0 .50 148 .0 70 .0 Gardner city, Cass County1 .38 1 .38 1,052 .9 534 .1 Garrison city, McLean County1 .00 1 .00 16 .0 10 .0 Gascoyne city, Bowman County0 .17 0 .17 1,394 .1 647 .1 Gilby city, Grand Forks County0 .35 0 .34 702 .9 332 .4 Gladstone city, Stark County0 .25 0 .25 1,520 .0 732 .0 Glenburn city, Renville County0 .14 0 .14 650 .0 407 .1 Glenfield city, Foster County1 .07 1 .04 776 .0 400 .0 Glen Ullin city, Morton County0 .73 0 .73 249 .3 160 .3 Golden Valley city, Mercer County0 .33 0 .33 184 .8 157 .6 Golva city, Golden Valley County

0 .29 0 .28 350 .0 382 .1 Goodrich city, Sheridan County0 .40 0 .40 157 .5 90 .0 Grace City city, Foster County3 .40 3 .40 1,260 .0 585 .3 Grafton city, Walsh County

20 .09 19 .90 2,655 .2 1,178 .3 Grand Forks city, Grand Forks County8 .13 8 .13 291 .1 99 .3 Grand Forks AFB CDP, Grand Forks County0 .17 0 .17 1,017 .6 452 .9 Grandin city0 .15 0 .15 1,153 .3 513 .3 Cass County0 .02 0 .02 – – Traill County0 .30 0 .30 23 .3 10 .0 Grano city, Renville County0 .28 0 .27 892 .6 500 .0 Granville city, McHenry County

0 .55 0 .55 109 .1 69 .1 Great Bend city, Richland County1 .50 1 .50 383 .3 108 .7 Green Acres CDP, Rolette County0 .61 0 .61 400 .0 198 .4 Grenora city, Williams County2 .08 2 .08 362 .0 177 .9 Gwinner city, Sargent County0 .27 0 .27 263 .0 188 .9 Hague city, Emmons County0 .46 0 .46 408 .7 293 .5 Halliday city, Dunn County0 .40 0 .40 52 .5 37 .5 Hamberg city, Wells County0 .27 0 .27 225 .9 137 .0 Hamilton city, Pembina County0 .17 0 .17 282 .4 205 .9 Hampden city, Ramsey County1 .59 1 .59 578 .0 315 .1 Hankinson city, Richland County

0 .22 0 .22 595 .5 359 .1 Hannaford city, Griggs County0 .19 0 .19 78 .9 73 .7 Hannah city, Cavalier County0 .19 0 .19 63 .2 73 .7 Hansboro city, Towner County1 .57 1 .57 92 .4 31 .2 Harmon CDP, Morton County1 .88 1 .88 948 .4 530 .3 Harvey city, Wells County1 .27 1 .26 569 .8 196 .8 Harwood city, Cass County0 .61 0 .61 1,273 .8 645 .9 Hatton city, Traill County0 .38 0 .37 191 .9 127 .0 Havana city, Sargent County0 .14 0 .14 164 .3 114 .3 Haynes city, Adams County0 .36 0 .36 652 .8 350 .0 Hazelton city, Emmons County

1 .27 1 .27 1,898 .4 845 .7 Hazen city, Mercer County1 .49 1 .49 501 .3 265 .8 Hebron city, Morton County0 .20 0 .20 75 .0 55 .0 Heil CDP, Grant County0 .47 0 .47 57 .4 70 .2 Heimdal CDP, Wells County0 .86 0 .85 1,442 .4 828 .2 Hettinger city, Adams County1 .09 1 .09 1,470 .6 700 .0 Hillsboro city, Traill County0 .36 0 .36 672 .2 375 .0 Hoople city, Walsh County0 .62 0 .62 416 .1 250 .0 Hope city, Steele County

10 .77 10 .77 225 .6 76 .7 Horace city, Cass County1 .53 1 .51 172 .8 91 .4 Hunter city, Cass County

0 .27 0 .27 311 .1 225 .9 Hurdsfield city, Wells County1 .00 1 .00 50 .0 50 .0 Inkster city, Grand Forks County

12 .88 12 .83 1,202 .4 544 .3 Jamestown city, Stutsman County0 .47 0 .47 53 .2 29 .8 Jessie CDP, Griggs County0 .25 0 .25 288 .0 200 .0 Jud city, LaMoure County0 .75 0 .75 109 .3 81 .3 Karlsruhe city, McHenry County0 .59 0 .59 88 .1 62 .7 Kathryn city, Barnes County1 .24 1 .24 883 .9 450 .0 Kenmare city, Ward County0 .60 0 .60 271 .7 138 .3 Kensal city, Stutsman County1 .24 1 .22 10 .7 9 .8 Kief city, McHenry County

0 .94 0 .94 798 .9 363 .8 Killdeer city, Dunn County1 .45 1 .45 477 .2 199 .3 Kindred city, Cass County0 .50 0 .50 50 .0 52 .0 Knox city, Benson County0 .15 0 .15 193 .3 273 .3 Kramer city, Bottineau County0 .38 0 .38 931 .6 652 .6 Kulm city, LaMoure County1 .03 1 .03 652 .4 391 .3 Lakota city, Nelson County1 .32 1 .32 673 .5 330 .3 LaMoure city, LaMoure County0 .08 0 .08 475 .0 275 .0 Landa city, Bottineau County1 .68 1 .65 1,138 .2 640 .6 Langdon city, Cavalier County0 .35 0 .35 280 .0 205 .7 Lankin city, Walsh County

0 .35 0 .35 700 .0 365 .7 Lansford city, Bottineau County0 .59 0 .59 2,281 .4 1,055 .9 Larimore city, Grand Forks County0 .41 0 .41 29 .3 34 .1 Larson CDP, Burke County



2010 2000 1990


2010 2010 2000 1990


2010

Gardner city, Cass County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74 80 85 –7 .5 35 39 42 –10 .3Garrison city, McLean County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,453 1,318 1,530 10 .2 737 655 733 12 .5Gascoyne city, Bowman County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 23 22 –30 .4 10 15 12 –33 .3Gilby city, Grand Forks County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 237 243 262 –2 .5 110 114 117 –3 .5Gladstone city, Stark County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 239 248 224 –3 .6 113 106 96 6 .6Glenburn city, Renville County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 380 374 439 1 .6 183 181 182 1 .1Glenfield city, Foster County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91 134 118 –32 .1 57 59 62 –3 .4Glen Ullin city, Morton County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 807 865 927 –6 .7 416 405 437 2 .7Golden Valley city, Mercer County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 182 183 239 –0 .5 117 124 139 –5 .6Golva city, Golden Valley County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61 106 101 –42 .5 52 71 62 –26 .8

Goodrich city, Sheridan County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98 163 192 –39 .9 107 113 122 –5 .3Grace City city, Foster County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63 71 108 –11 .3 36 39 49 –7 .7Grafton city, Walsh County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,284 4,516 4,884 –5 .1 1,990 2,005 2,051 –0 .7Grand Forks city, Grand Forks County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52,838 r 49,366 49,417 7 .0 23,449 r 20,873 19,586 12 .3Grand Forks AFB CDP, Grand Forks County . . . . . . . . . 2,367 4,832 9,343 –51 .0 807 1,516 2,618 –46 .8Grandin city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 173 181 213 –4 .4 77 80 77 –3 .8 Cass County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 173 181 213 –4 .4 77 80 77 –3 .8 Traill County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . – – – – – – – –Grano city, Renville County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 9 9 –22 .2 3 5 3 –40 .0Granville city, McHenry County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 241 286 236 –15 .7 135 141 142 –4 .3

Great Bend city, Richland County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60 118 108 –49 .2 38 42 47 –9 .5Green Acres CDP, Rolette County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 575 (X) (X) (X) 163 (X) (X) (X)Grenora city, Williams County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 244 202 261 20 .8 121 139 170 –12 .9Gwinner city, Sargent County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 753 717 585 5 .0 370 329 246 12 .5Hague city, Emmons County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71 91 109 –22 .0 51 53 59 –3 .8Halliday city, Dunn County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 188 227 288 –17 .2 135 155 182 –12 .9Hamberg city, Wells County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 28 19 –25 .0 15 15 16 –Hamilton city, Pembina County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61 73 74 –16 .4 37 40 43 –7 .5Hampden city, Ramsey County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48 60 89 –20 .0 35 53 58 –34 .0Hankinson city, Richland County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 919 1,058 1,038 –13 .1 501 524 510 –4 .4

Hannaford city, Griggs County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 131 181 204 –27 .6 79 85 92 –7 .1Hannah city, Cavalier County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 20 49 –25 .0 14 24 49 –41 .7Hansboro city, Towner County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 8 20 50 .0 14 13 16 7 .7Harmon CDP, Morton County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 145 (X) (X) (X) 49 (X) (X) (X)Harvey city, Wells County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,783 1,989 2,263 –10 .4 997 1,056 1,060 –5 .6Harwood city, Cass County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 718 607 590 18 .3 248 201 172 23 .4Hatton city, Traill County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 777 707 800 9 .9 394 331 334 19 .0Havana city, Sargent County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71 94 124 –24 .5 47 51 61 –7 .8Haynes city, Adams County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 19 37 21 .1 16 15 16 6 .7Hazelton city, Emmons County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 235 237 240 –0 .8 126 129 126 –2 .3

Hazen city, Mercer County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,411 2,457 2,818 –1 .9 1,074 1,131 1,118 –5 .0Hebron city, Morton County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 747 803 888 –7 .0 396 434 470 –8 .8Heil CDP, Grant County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 (X) (X) (X) 11 (X) (X) (X)Heimdal CDP, Wells County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 (X) (X) (X) 33 (X) (X) (X)Hettinger city, Adams County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,226 1,307 1,574 –6 .2 704 720 769 –2 .2Hillsboro city, Traill County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,603 1,563 1,488 2 .6 763 727 714 5 .0Hoople city, Walsh County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 242 292 310 –17 .1 135 148 145 –8 .8Hope city, Steele County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 258 303 281 –14 .9 155 155 163 –Horace city, Cass County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,430 915 662 165 .6 826 311 216 165 .6Hunter city, Cass County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 261 326 341 –19 .9 138 160 168 –13 .8

Hurdsfield city, Wells County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84 91 92 –7 .7 61 65 71 –6 .2Inkster city, Grand Forks County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 102 95 –51 .0 50 55 66 –9 .1Jamestown city, Stutsman County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15,427 15,527 15,571 –0 .6 6,983 6,970 6,740 0 .2Jessie CDP, Griggs County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 (X) (X) (X) 14 (X) (X) (X)Jud city, LaMoure County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72 76 84 –5 .3 50 51 53 –2 .0Karlsruhe city, McHenry County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82 119 143 –31 .1 61 70 76 –12 .9Kathryn city, Barnes County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52 63 72 –17 .5 37 43 46 –14 .0Kenmare city, Ward County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,096 1,081 1,214 1 .4 558 553 637 0 .9Kensal city, Stutsman County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 163 161 191 1 .2 83 86 93 –3 .5Kief city, McHenry County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 13 24 – 12 18 21 –33 .3

Killdeer city, Dunn County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 751 713 722 5 .3 342 351 367 –2 .6Kindred city, Cass County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 692 614 569 12 .7 289 267 246 8 .2Knox city, Benson County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 59 45 –57 .6 26 28 25 –7 .1Kramer city, Bottineau County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 44 51 –34 .1 41 43 46 –4 .7Kulm city, LaMoure County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 354 422 514 –16 .1 248 251 283 –1 .2Lakota city, Nelson County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 672 781 898 –14 .0 403 387 429 4 .1LaMoure city, LaMoure County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 889 944 970 –5 .8 436 433 430 0 .7Landa city, Bottineau County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 28 38 35 .7 22 28 29 –21 .4Langdon city, Cavalier County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,878 2,101 2,241 –10 .6 1,057 1,178 1,109 –10 .3Lankin city, Walsh County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98 131 152 –25 .2 72 83 89 –13 .3

Lansford city, Bottineau County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 245 253 249 –3 .2 128 131 130 –2 .3Larimore city, Grand Forks County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,346 1,433 1,464 –6 .1 623 620 654 0 .5Larson CDP, Burke County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 17 26 –29 .4 14 13 13 7 .7





2010 2000 1990


2010 2010 2000 1990


2010

Lawton city, Ramsey County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 42 63 –28 .6 33 38 42 –13 .2Leal city, Barnes County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 36 35 –44 .4 11 12 16 –8 .3Leeds city, Benson County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 427 464 542 –8 .0 266 282 302 –5 .7Lehr city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80 114 191 –29 .8 100 98 123 2 .0 Logan County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 25 44 –44 .0 20 22 27 –9 .1 McIntosh County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66 89 147 –25 .8 80 76 96 5 .3Leith city, Grant County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 28 43 –42 .9 18 21 28 –14 .3Leonard city, Cass County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 223 255 310 –12 .5 121 124 137 –2 .4Lidgerwood city, Richland County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 652 r 781 799 –16 .5 417 404 431 3 .2Lignite city, Burke County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 155 174 242 –10 .9 96 111 126 –13 .5

Lincoln city, Burleigh County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,406 1,730 1,132 39 .1 836 541 346 54 .5Linton city, Emmons County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,097 1,321 1,410 –17 .0 642 701 684 –8 .4Lisbon city, Ransom County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,154 2,292 2,177 –6 .0 1,090 1,017 940 7 .2Litchville city, Barnes County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 172 191 205 –9 .9 98 110 125 –10 .9Logan CDP, Ward County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 194 (X) (X) (X) 79 (X) (X) (X)Loma city, Cavalier County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 21 27 –23 .8 13 10 13 30 .0Loraine city, Renville County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 19 15 –52 .6 7 8 11 –12 .5Ludden city, Dickey County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 29 41 –20 .7 19 18 26 5 .6Luverne city, Steele County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 44 41 –29 .5 21 23 23 –8 .7McClusky city, Sheridan County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 380 415 492 –8 .4 278 247 267 12 .6

McHenry city, Foster County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56 71 85 –21 .1 37 45 57 –17 .8McLeod CDP, Ransom County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 (X) (X) (X) 20 (X) (X) (X)McVille city, Nelson County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 349 470 559 –25 .7 247 266 281 –7 .1Maddock city, Benson County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 382 498 559 –23 .3 253 276 298 –8 .3Makoti city, Ward County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 154 145 145 6 .2 87 89 92 –2 .2Mandan city, Morton County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18,331 16,718 15,177 9 .6 7,950 6,958 5,910 14 .3Mandaree CDP, McKenzie County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 596 558 367 6 .8 173 151 131 14 .6Manning CDP, Dunn County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74 (X) (X) (X) 30 (X) (X) (X)Mantador city, Richland County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64 71 77 –9 .9 36 37 37 –2 .7Manvel city, Grand Forks County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 360 370 333 –2 .7 149 144 129 3 .5

Mapleton city, Cass County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 762 606 682 25 .7 264 193 203 36 .8Marion city, LaMoure County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 133 146 169 –8 .9 81 86 92 –5 .8Marmarth city, Slope County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 136 140 144 –2 .9 93 101 99 –7 .9Martin city, Sheridan County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78 96 117 –18 .8 43 48 56 –10 .4Max city, McLean County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 334 278 301 20 .1 164 150 155 9 .3Maxbass city, Bottineau County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84 91 123 –7 .7 61 70 77 –12 .9Mayville city, Traill County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,858 1,953 2,092 –4 .9 872 876 866 –0 .5Medina city, Stutsman County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 308 335 387 –8 .1 182 209 213 –12 .9Medora city, Billings County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 112 100 101 12 .0 102 117 77 –12 .8Menoken CDP, Burleigh County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70 (X) (X) (X) 31 (X) (X) (X)

Mercer city, McLean County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 94 86 104 9 .3 58 56 57 3 .6Michigan City city, Nelson County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 294 345 413 –14 .8 173 176 201 –1 .7Milnor city, Sargent County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 653 711 651 –8 .2 350 338 307 3 .6Milton city, Cavalier County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58 85 133 –31 .8 40 60 81 –33 .3Minnewaukan city, Benson County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 224 318 401 –29 .6 178 199 203 –10 .6Minot city, Ward County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40,888 36,567 34,544 11 .8 18,744 16,475 15,040 13 .8Minot AFB CDP, Ward County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,521 7,599 9,095 –27 .3 1,463 2,441 2,575 –40 .1Minto city, Walsh County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 604 657 560 –8 .1 294 298 255 –1 .3Mohall city, Renville County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 783 812 931 –3 .6 372 397 427 –6 .3Monango city, Dickey County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 28 53 28 .6 22 18 32 22 .2

Montpelier city, Stutsman County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87 103 82 –15 .5 46 45 40 2 .2Mooreton city, Richland County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 197 204 193 –3 .4 92 95 94 –3 .2Mott city, Hettinger County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 721 808 1,019 –10 .8 415 441 506 –5 .9Mountain city, Pembina County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92 133 134 –30 .8 42 55 57 –23 .6Munich city, Cavalier County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 210 268 310 –21 .6 116 124 135 –6 .5Mylo city, Rolette County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 19 20 5 .3 12 14 13 –14 .3Napoleon city, Logan County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 792 857 930 –7 .6 401 420 460 –4 .5Nash CDP, Walsh County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 (X) (X) (X) 13 (X) (X) (X)Neche city, Pembina County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 371 437 434 –15 .1 168 188 200 –10 .6Nekoma city, Cavalier County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 51 63 –2 .0 36 41 51 –12 .2

Newburg city, Bottineau County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 110 88 104 25 .0 62 64 66 –3 .1New England city, Hettinger County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 600 555 663 8 .1 319 320 363 –0 .3New Leipzig city, Grant County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 221 274 326 –19 .3 155 164 180 –5 .5New Rockford city, Eddy County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,391 1,463 1,604 –4 .9 750 778 760 –3 .6New Salem city, Morton County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 946 938 909 0 .9 449 448 442 0 .2New Town city, Mountrail County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,925 1,367 1,388 40 .8 701 512 553 36 .9Niagara city, Grand Forks County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53 57 73 –7 .0 29 35 37 –17 .1Nome city, Barnes County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62 70 82 –11 .4 35 38 43 –7 .9Noonan city, Divide County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 121 154 231 –21 .4 107 116 148 –7 .8North River city, Cass County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56 65 68 –13 .8 24 19 20 26 .3

Northwood city, Grand Forks County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 945 959 1,166 –1 .5 443 459 503 –3 .5Oakes city, Dickey County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,856 1,979 1,775 –6 .2 912 908 829 0 .4Oberon city, Benson County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105 81 103 29 .6 58 46 64 26 .1





1 .00 0 .92 32 .6 35 .9 Lawton city, Ramsey County0 .14 0 .14 142 .9 78 .6 Leal city, Barnes County0 .45 0 .45 948 .9 591 .1 Leeds city, Benson County0 .19 0 .19 421 .1 526 .3 Lehr city0 .07 0 .07 200 .0 285 .7 Logan County0 .11 0 .11 600 .0 727 .3 McIntosh County1 .25 1 .23 13 .0 14 .6 Leith city, Grant County0 .75 0 .75 297 .3 161 .3 Leonard city, Cass County0 .66 0 .66 987 .9 631 .8 Lidgerwood city, Richland County0 .14 0 .14 1,107 .1 685 .7 Lignite city, Burke County

1 .12 1 .12 2,148 .2 746 .4 Lincoln city, Burleigh County0 .75 0 .75 1,462 .7 856 .0 Linton city, Emmons County2 .25 2 .25 957 .3 484 .4 Lisbon city, Ransom County1 .48 1 .48 116 .2 66 .2 Litchville city, Barnes County1 .47 1 .46 132 .9 54 .1 Logan CDP, Ward County

26 .83 26 .43 0 .6 0 .5 Loma city, Cavalier County0 .25 0 .25 36 .0 28 .0 Loraine city, Renville County0 .77 0 .77 29 .9 24 .7 Ludden city, Dickey County0 .26 0 .26 119 .2 80 .8 Luverne city, Steele County0 .39 0 .39 974 .4 712 .8 McClusky city, Sheridan County

0 .25 0 .25 224 .0 148 .0 McHenry city, Foster County0 .77 0 .77 35 .1 26 .0 McLeod CDP, Ransom County1 .51 1 .44 242 .4 171 .5 McVille city, Nelson County0 .89 0 .89 429 .2 284 .3 Maddock city, Benson County0 .20 0 .20 770 .0 435 .0 Makoti city, Ward County

11 .13 11 .03 1,661 .9 720 .8 Mandan city, Morton County11 .22 11 .21 53 .2 15 .4 Mandaree CDP, McKenzie County

0 .57 0 .57 129 .8 52 .6 Manning CDP, Dunn County0 .14 0 .14 457 .1 257 .1 Mantador city, Richland County0 .29 0 .29 1,241 .4 513 .8 Manvel city, Grand Forks County

4 .00 4 .00 190 .5 66 .0 Mapleton city, Cass County1 .00 0 .84 158 .3 96 .4 Marion city, LaMoure County2 .53 2 .50 54 .4 37 .2 Marmarth city, Slope County0 .09 0 .09 866 .7 477 .8 Martin city, Sheridan County0 .78 0 .78 428 .2 210 .3 Max city, McLean County0 .17 0 .17 494 .1 358 .8 Maxbass city, Bottineau County1 .92 1 .92 967 .7 454 .2 Mayville city, Traill County1 .02 1 .02 302 .0 178 .4 Medina city, Stutsman County0 .37 0 .36 311 .1 283 .3 Medora city, Billings County2 .24 2 .18 32 .1 14 .2 Menoken CDP, Burleigh County

0 .23 0 .22 427 .3 263 .6 Mercer city, McLean County0 .53 0 .51 576 .5 339 .2 Michigan City city, Nelson County1 .01 0 .94 694 .7 372 .3 Milnor city, Sargent County0 .51 0 .51 113 .7 78 .4 Milton city, Cavalier County0 .27 0 .27 829 .6 659 .3 Minnewaukan city, Benson County

17 .45 17 .43 2,345 .8 1,075 .4 Minot city, Ward County7 .67 7 .35 751 .2 199 .0 Minot AFB CDP, Ward County1 .42 1 .42 425 .4 207 .0 Minto city, Walsh County1 .08 1 .08 725 .0 344 .4 Mohall city, Renville County0 .37 0 .37 97 .3 59 .5 Monango city, Dickey County

0 .18 0 .18 483 .3 255 .6 Montpelier city, Stutsman County0 .27 0 .27 729 .6 340 .7 Mooreton city, Richland County0 .90 0 .90 801 .1 461 .1 Mott city, Hettinger County0 .14 0 .14 657 .1 300 .0 Mountain city, Pembina County1 .44 1 .43 146 .9 81 .1 Munich city, Cavalier County0 .91 0 .91 22 .0 13 .2 Mylo city, Rolette County1 .40 1 .40 565 .7 286 .4 Napoleon city, Logan County1 .02 1 .02 31 .4 12 .7 Nash CDP, Walsh County0 .35 0 .35 1,060 .0 480 .0 Neche city, Pembina County0 .36 0 .36 138 .9 100 .0 Nekoma city, Cavalier County

0 .13 0 .13 846 .2 476 .9 Newburg city, Bottineau County0 .49 0 .49 1,224 .5 651 .0 New England city, Hettinger County0 .89 0 .89 248 .3 174 .2 New Leipzig city, Grant County1 .54 1 .51 921 .2 496 .7 New Rockford city, Eddy County1 .47 1 .46 647 .9 307 .5 New Salem city, Morton County1 .28 1 .28 1,503 .9 547 .7 New Town city, Mountrail County0 .97 0 .94 56 .4 30 .9 Niagara city, Grand Forks County0 .41 0 .41 151 .2 85 .4 Nome city, Barnes County0 .31 0 .30 403 .3 356 .7 Noonan city, Divide County0 .07 0 .06 933 .3 400 .0 North River city, Cass County

1 .27 1 .27 744 .1 348 .8 Northwood city, Grand Forks County1 .64 1 .64 1,131 .7 556 .1 Oakes city, Dickey County0 .34 0 .34 308 .8 170 .6 Oberon city, Benson County







1 .00 0 .92 32 .6 35 .9 Lawton city, Ramsey County0 .14 0 .14 142 .9 78 .6 Leal city, Barnes County0 .45 0 .45 948 .9 591 .1 Leeds city, Benson County0 .19 0 .19 421 .1 526 .3 Lehr city0 .07 0 .07 200 .0 285 .7 Logan County0 .11 0 .11 600 .0 727 .3 McIntosh County1 .25 1 .23 13 .0 14 .6 Leith city, Grant County0 .75 0 .75 297 .3 161 .3 Leonard city, Cass County0 .66 0 .66 987 .9 631 .8 Lidgerwood city, Richland County0 .14 0 .14 1,107 .1 685 .7 Lignite city, Burke County

1 .12 1 .12 2,148 .2 746 .4 Lincoln city, Burleigh County0 .75 0 .75 1,462 .7 856 .0 Linton city, Emmons County2 .25 2 .25 957 .3 484 .4 Lisbon city, Ransom County1 .48 1 .48 116 .2 66 .2 Litchville city, Barnes County1 .47 1 .46 132 .9 54 .1 Logan CDP, Ward County

26 .83 26 .43 0 .6 0 .5 Loma city, Cavalier County0 .25 0 .25 36 .0 28 .0 Loraine city, Renville County0 .77 0 .77 29 .9 24 .7 Ludden city, Dickey County0 .26 0 .26 119 .2 80 .8 Luverne city, Steele County0 .39 0 .39 974 .4 712 .8 McClusky city, Sheridan County

0 .25 0 .25 224 .0 148 .0 McHenry city, Foster County0 .77 0 .77 35 .1 26 .0 McLeod CDP, Ransom County1 .51 1 .44 242 .4 171 .5 McVille city, Nelson County0 .89 0 .89 429 .2 284 .3 Maddock city, Benson County0 .20 0 .20 770 .0 435 .0 Makoti city, Ward County

11 .13 11 .03 1,661 .9 720 .8 Mandan city, Morton County11 .22 11 .21 53 .2 15 .4 Mandaree CDP, McKenzie County

0 .57 0 .57 129 .8 52 .6 Manning CDP, Dunn County0 .14 0 .14 457 .1 257 .1 Mantador city, Richland County0 .29 0 .29 1,241 .4 513 .8 Manvel city, Grand Forks County

4 .00 4 .00 190 .5 66 .0 Mapleton city, Cass County1 .00 0 .84 158 .3 96 .4 Marion city, LaMoure County2 .53 2 .50 54 .4 37 .2 Marmarth city, Slope County0 .09 0 .09 866 .7 477 .8 Martin city, Sheridan County0 .78 0 .78 428 .2 210 .3 Max city, McLean County0 .17 0 .17 494 .1 358 .8 Maxbass city, Bottineau County1 .92 1 .92 967 .7 454 .2 Mayville city, Traill County1 .02 1 .02 302 .0 178 .4 Medina city, Stutsman County0 .37 0 .36 311 .1 283 .3 Medora city, Billings County2 .24 2 .18 32 .1 14 .2 Menoken CDP, Burleigh County

0 .23 0 .22 427 .3 263 .6 Mercer city, McLean County0 .53 0 .51 576 .5 339 .2 Michigan City city, Nelson County1 .01 0 .94 694 .7 372 .3 Milnor city, Sargent County0 .51 0 .51 113 .7 78 .4 Milton city, Cavalier County0 .27 0 .27 829 .6 659 .3 Minnewaukan city, Benson County

17 .45 17 .43 2,345 .8 1,075 .4 Minot city, Ward County7 .67 7 .35 751 .2 199 .0 Minot AFB CDP, Ward County1 .42 1 .42 425 .4 207 .0 Minto city, Walsh County1 .08 1 .08 725 .0 344 .4 Mohall city, Renville County0 .37 0 .37 97 .3 59 .5 Monango city, Dickey County

0 .18 0 .18 483 .3 255 .6 Montpelier city, Stutsman County0 .27 0 .27 729 .6 340 .7 Mooreton city, Richland County0 .90 0 .90 801 .1 461 .1 Mott city, Hettinger County0 .14 0 .14 657 .1 300 .0 Mountain city, Pembina County1 .44 1 .43 146 .9 81 .1 Munich city, Cavalier County0 .91 0 .91 22 .0 13 .2 Mylo city, Rolette County1 .40 1 .40 565 .7 286 .4 Napoleon city, Logan County1 .02 1 .02 31 .4 12 .7 Nash CDP, Walsh County0 .35 0 .35 1,060 .0 480 .0 Neche city, Pembina County0 .36 0 .36 138 .9 100 .0 Nekoma city, Cavalier County

0 .13 0 .13 846 .2 476 .9 Newburg city, Bottineau County0 .49 0 .49 1,224 .5 651 .0 New England city, Hettinger County0 .89 0 .89 248 .3 174 .2 New Leipzig city, Grant County1 .54 1 .51 921 .2 496 .7 New Rockford city, Eddy County1 .47 1 .46 647 .9 307 .5 New Salem city, Morton County1 .28 1 .28 1,503 .9 547 .7 New Town city, Mountrail County0 .97 0 .94 56 .4 30 .9 Niagara city, Grand Forks County0 .41 0 .41 151 .2 85 .4 Nome city, Barnes County0 .31 0 .30 403 .3 356 .7 Noonan city, Divide County0 .07 0 .06 933 .3 400 .0 North River city, Cass County

1 .27 1 .27 744 .1 348 .8 Northwood city, Grand Forks County1 .64 1 .64 1,131 .7 556 .1 Oakes city, Dickey County0 .34 0 .34 308 .8 170 .6 Oberon city, Benson County



2010 2000 1990


2010 2010 2000 1990


2010

Lawton city, Ramsey County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 42 63 –28 .6 33 38 42 –13 .2Leal city, Barnes County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 36 35 –44 .4 11 12 16 –8 .3Leeds city, Benson County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 427 464 542 –8 .0 266 282 302 –5 .7Lehr city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80 114 191 –29 .8 100 98 123 2 .0 Logan County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 25 44 –44 .0 20 22 27 –9 .1 McIntosh County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66 89 147 –25 .8 80 76 96 5 .3Leith city, Grant County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 28 43 –42 .9 18 21 28 –14 .3Leonard city, Cass County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 223 255 310 –12 .5 121 124 137 –2 .4Lidgerwood city, Richland County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 652 r 781 799 –16 .5 417 404 431 3 .2Lignite city, Burke County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 155 174 242 –10 .9 96 111 126 –13 .5

Lincoln city, Burleigh County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,406 1,730 1,132 39 .1 836 541 346 54 .5Linton city, Emmons County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,097 1,321 1,410 –17 .0 642 701 684 –8 .4Lisbon city, Ransom County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,154 2,292 2,177 –6 .0 1,090 1,017 940 7 .2Litchville city, Barnes County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 172 191 205 –9 .9 98 110 125 –10 .9Logan CDP, Ward County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 194 (X) (X) (X) 79 (X) (X) (X)Loma city, Cavalier County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 21 27 –23 .8 13 10 13 30 .0Loraine city, Renville County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 19 15 –52 .6 7 8 11 –12 .5Ludden city, Dickey County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 29 41 –20 .7 19 18 26 5 .6Luverne city, Steele County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 44 41 –29 .5 21 23 23 –8 .7McClusky city, Sheridan County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 380 415 492 –8 .4 278 247 267 12 .6

McHenry city, Foster County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56 71 85 –21 .1 37 45 57 –17 .8McLeod CDP, Ransom County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 (X) (X) (X) 20 (X) (X) (X)McVille city, Nelson County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 349 470 559 –25 .7 247 266 281 –7 .1Maddock city, Benson County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 382 498 559 –23 .3 253 276 298 –8 .3Makoti city, Ward County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 154 145 145 6 .2 87 89 92 –2 .2Mandan city, Morton County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18,331 16,718 15,177 9 .6 7,950 6,958 5,910 14 .3Mandaree CDP, McKenzie County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 596 558 367 6 .8 173 151 131 14 .6Manning CDP, Dunn County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74 (X) (X) (X) 30 (X) (X) (X)Mantador city, Richland County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64 71 77 –9 .9 36 37 37 –2 .7Manvel city, Grand Forks County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 360 370 333 –2 .7 149 144 129 3 .5

Mapleton city, Cass County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 762 606 682 25 .7 264 193 203 36 .8Marion city, LaMoure County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 133 146 169 –8 .9 81 86 92 –5 .8Marmarth city, Slope County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 136 140 144 –2 .9 93 101 99 –7 .9Martin city, Sheridan County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78 96 117 –18 .8 43 48 56 –10 .4Max city, McLean County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 334 278 301 20 .1 164 150 155 9 .3Maxbass city, Bottineau County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84 91 123 –7 .7 61 70 77 –12 .9Mayville city, Traill County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,858 1,953 2,092 –4 .9 872 876 866 –0 .5Medina city, Stutsman County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 308 335 387 –8 .1 182 209 213 –12 .9Medora city, Billings County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 112 100 101 12 .0 102 117 77 –12 .8Menoken CDP, Burleigh County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70 (X) (X) (X) 31 (X) (X) (X)

Mercer city, McLean County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 94 86 104 9 .3 58 56 57 3 .6Michigan City city, Nelson County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 294 345 413 –14 .8 173 176 201 –1 .7Milnor city, Sargent County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 653 711 651 –8 .2 350 338 307 3 .6Milton city, Cavalier County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58 85 133 –31 .8 40 60 81 –33 .3Minnewaukan city, Benson County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 224 318 401 –29 .6 178 199 203 –10 .6Minot city, Ward County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40,888 36,567 34,544 11 .8 18,744 16,475 15,040 13 .8Minot AFB CDP, Ward County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,521 7,599 9,095 –27 .3 1,463 2,441 2,575 –40 .1Minto city, Walsh County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 604 657 560 –8 .1 294 298 255 –1 .3Mohall city, Renville County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 783 812 931 –3 .6 372 397 427 –6 .3Monango city, Dickey County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 28 53 28 .6 22 18 32 22 .2

Montpelier city, Stutsman County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87 103 82 –15 .5 46 45 40 2 .2Mooreton city, Richland County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 197 204 193 –3 .4 92 95 94 –3 .2Mott city, Hettinger County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 721 808 1,019 –10 .8 415 441 506 –5 .9Mountain city, Pembina County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92 133 134 –30 .8 42 55 57 –23 .6Munich city, Cavalier County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 210 268 310 –21 .6 116 124 135 –6 .5Mylo city, Rolette County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 19 20 5 .3 12 14 13 –14 .3Napoleon city, Logan County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 792 857 930 –7 .6 401 420 460 –4 .5Nash CDP, Walsh County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 (X) (X) (X) 13 (X) (X) (X)Neche city, Pembina County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 371 437 434 –15 .1 168 188 200 –10 .6Nekoma city, Cavalier County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 51 63 –2 .0 36 41 51 –12 .2

Newburg city, Bottineau County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 110 88 104 25 .0 62 64 66 –3 .1New England city, Hettinger County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 600 555 663 8 .1 319 320 363 –0 .3New Leipzig city, Grant County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 221 274 326 –19 .3 155 164 180 –5 .5New Rockford city, Eddy County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,391 1,463 1,604 –4 .9 750 778 760 –3 .6New Salem city, Morton County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 946 938 909 0 .9 449 448 442 0 .2New Town city, Mountrail County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,925 1,367 1,388 40 .8 701 512 553 36 .9Niagara city, Grand Forks County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53 57 73 –7 .0 29 35 37 –17 .1Nome city, Barnes County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62 70 82 –11 .4 35 38 43 –7 .9Noonan city, Divide County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 121 154 231 –21 .4 107 116 148 –7 .8North River city, Cass County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56 65 68 –13 .8 24 19 20 26 .3

Northwood city, Grand Forks County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 945 959 1,166 –1 .5 443 459 503 –3 .5Oakes city, Dickey County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,856 1,979 1,775 –6 .2 912 908 829 0 .4Oberon city, Benson County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105 81 103 29 .6 58 46 64 26 .1





2010 2000 1990


2010 2010 2000 1990


2010

Oriska city, Barnes County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 118 128 103 –7 .8 63 57 48 10 .5Orrin CDP, Pierce County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 (X) (X) (X) 17 (X) (X) (X)Osnabrock city, Cavalier County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 134 174 214 –23 .0 73 85 90 –14 .1Overly city, Bottineau County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 19 25 –5 .3 11 10 13 10 .0Oxbow city, Cass County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 305 248 100 23 .0 108 84 40 28 .6Page city, Cass County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 232 225 266 3 .1 121 125 144 –3 .2Palermo city, Mountrail County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74 77 95 –3 .9 67 53 60 26 .4Park River city, Walsh County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,403 1,535 1,725 –8 .6 734 760 793 –3 .4Parshall city, Mountrail County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 903 981 943 –8 .0 364 392 403 –7 .1Pekin city, Nelson County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70 80 101 –12 .5 50 63 70 –20 .6

Pembina city, Pembina County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 592 642 642 –7 .8 279 274 265 1 .8Perth city, Towner County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 13 22 –30 .8 6 6 13 –Petersburg city, Nelson County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 192 195 219 –1 .5 99 106 116 –6 .6Pettibone city, Kidder County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70 88 93 –20 .5 62 60 66 3 .3Pick City city, Mercer County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 123 166 203 –25 .9 132 117 129 12 .8Pillsbury city, Barnes County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 24 31 –50 .0 12 11 18 9 .1Pingree city, Stutsman County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60 66 61 –9 .1 29 32 36 –9 .4Pisek city, Walsh County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 106 96 130 10 .4 60 60 71 –Plaza city, Mountrail County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 171 167 193 2 .4 114 115 126 –0 .9Porcupine CDP, Sioux County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 146 (X) (X) (X) 40 (X) (X) (X)

Portal city, Burke County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 126 131 192 –3 .8 80 98 104 –18 .4Portland city, Traill County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 606 604 602 0 .3 297 286 268 3 .8Powers Lake city, Burke County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 280 309 408 –9 .4 172 183 221 –6 .0Prairie Rose city, Cass County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73 68 78 7 .4 26 20 23 30 .0Raleigh CDP, Grant County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 (X) (X) (X) 9 (X) (X) (X)Ray city, Williams County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 592 534 603 10 .9 301 296 316 1 .7Reeder city, Adams County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 162 181 252 –10 .5 114 130 136 –12 .3Regan city, Burleigh County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 43 51 – 31 32 29 –3 .1Regent city, Hettinger County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 160 211 268 –24 .2 120 126 142 –4 .8Reile’s Acres city, Cass County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 513 254 210 102 .0 147 72 56 104 .2

Reynolds city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 301 350 299 –14 .0 127 135 128 –5 .9 Grand Forks County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93 126 107 –26 .2 44 49 50 –10 .2 Traill County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 208 224 192 –7 .1 83 86 78 –3 .5Rhame city, Bowman County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 169 189 186 –10 .6 107 117 105 –8 .5Richardton city, Stark County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 529 619 625 –14 .5 285 285 290 –Riverdale city, McLean County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 205 273 283 –24 .9 188 157 135 19 .7Robinson city, Kidder County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 71 87 –47 .9 56 56 61 –Rocklake city, Towner County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 101 194 221 –47 .9 103 116 129 –11 .2Rogers city, Barnes County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 61 69 –24 .6 28 29 33 –3 .4Rolette city, Rolette County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 594 538 623 10 .4 284 286 298 –0 .7

Rolla city, Rolette County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,280 1,417 1,371 –9 .7 619 656 647 –5 .6Ross city, Mountrail County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 97 48 61 102 .1 54 29 40 86 .2Rugby city, Pierce County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,876 2,939 2,909 –2 .1 1,407 1,434 1,369 –1 .9Ruso city, McLean County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 6 8 –33 .3 3 3 5 –Ruthville CDP, Ward County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 191 (X) (X) (X) 114 (X) (X) (X)Rutland city, Sargent County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 163 220 212 –25 .9 98 102 115 –3 .9Ryder city, Ward County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85 92 121 –7 .6 62 67 72 –7 .5St . John city, Rolette County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 341 358 368 –4 .7 151 154 141 –1 .9St . Thomas city, Pembina County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 331 447 444 –26 .0 182 201 207 –9 .5Sanborn city, Barnes County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 192 194 164 –1 .0 80 80 80 –

Sarles city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 25 86 12 .0 27 44 57 –38 .6 Cavalier County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 22 83 9 .1 26 42 55 –38 .1 Towner County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 3 3 33 .3 1 2 2 –50 .0Sawyer city, Ward County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 357 377 319 –5 .3 150 162 143 –7 .4Scranton city, Bowman County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 281 304 294 –7 .6 147 139 155 5 .8Selfridge city, Sioux County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 160 223 242 –28 .3 76 85 108 –10 .6Selz CDP, Pierce County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 (X) (X) (X) 30 (X) (X) (X)Sentinel Butte city, Golden Valley County . . . . . . . . . . . . 56 62 79 –9 .7 38 44 45 –13 .6Sharon city, Steele County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96 109 119 –11 .9 73 76 79 –3 .9Sheldon city, Ransom County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 116 135 149 –14 .1 61 71 74 –14 .1

Shell Valley CDP, Rolette County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,197 395 343 203 .0 393 103 90 281 .6Sherwood city, Renville County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 242 255 286 –5 .1 133 138 144 –3 .6Sheyenne city, Eddy County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 204 318 272 –35 .8 147 187 155 –21 .4Sibley city, Barnes County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 46 41 –34 .8 50 59 53 –15 .3Solen city, Sioux County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83 86 92 –3 .5 44 43 42 2 .3Souris city, Bottineau County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58 83 97 –30 .1 45 46 57 –2 .2South Heart city, Stark County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 301 307 322 –2 .0 129 119 122 8 .4Spiritwood CDP, Stutsman County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 (X) (X) (X) 19 (X) (X) (X)Spiritwood Lake city, Stutsman County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90 72 61 25 .0 99 63 96 57 .1Springbrook city, Williams County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 26 29 3 .8 14 20 14 –30 .0

Stanley city, Mountrail County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,458 1,279 1,371 14 .0 718 664 678 8 .1Stanton city, Mercer County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 366 345 517 6 .1 198 198 230 –Starkweather city, Ramsey County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 117 157 197 –25 .5 74 89 88 –16 .9





0 .28 0 .28 421 .4 225 .0 Oriska city, Barnes County0 .23 0 .23 95 .7 73 .9 Orrin CDP, Pierce County0 .30 0 .30 446 .7 243 .3 Osnabrock city, Cavalier County0 .36 0 .36 50 .0 30 .6 Overly city, Bottineau County0 .42 0 .42 726 .2 257 .1 Oxbow city, Cass County0 .18 0 .18 1,288 .9 672 .2 Page city, Cass County2 .21 2 .20 33 .6 30 .5 Palermo city, Mountrail County2 .17 2 .17 646 .5 338 .2 Park River city, Walsh County0 .55 0 .55 1,641 .8 661 .8 Parshall city, Mountrail County0 .25 0 .25 280 .0 200 .0 Pekin city, Nelson County

0 .77 0 .76 778 .9 367 .1 Pembina city, Pembina County0 .13 0 .13 69 .2 46 .2 Perth city, Towner County1 .04 1 .03 186 .4 96 .1 Petersburg city, Nelson County0 .17 0 .17 411 .8 364 .7 Pettibone city, Kidder County0 .18 0 .18 683 .3 733 .3 Pick City city, Mercer County0 .26 0 .26 46 .2 46 .2 Pillsbury city, Barnes County0 .18 0 .18 333 .3 161 .1 Pingree city, Stutsman County0 .12 0 .12 883 .3 500 .0 Pisek city, Walsh County1 .14 1 .12 152 .7 101 .8 Plaza city, Mountrail County0 .20 0 .20 730 .0 200 .0 Porcupine CDP, Sioux County

0 .56 0 .56 225 .0 142 .9 Portal city, Burke County0 .86 0 .86 704 .7 345 .3 Portland city, Traill County1 .23 0 .99 282 .8 173 .7 Powers Lake city, Burke County0 .04 0 .04 1,825 .0 650 .0 Prairie Rose city, Cass County0 .29 0 .29 41 .4 31 .0 Raleigh CDP, Grant County1 .04 1 .01 586 .1 298 .0 Ray city, Williams County0 .62 0 .62 261 .3 183 .9 Reeder city, Adams County1 .01 1 .01 42 .6 30 .7 Regan city, Burleigh County0 .56 0 .56 285 .7 214 .3 Regent city, Hettinger County0 .48 0 .48 1,068 .8 306 .3 Reile’s Acres city, Cass County

0 .67 0 .67 449 .3 189 .6 Reynolds city0 .25 0 .25 372 .0 176 .0 Grand Forks County0 .43 0 .43 483 .7 193 .0 Traill County1 .50 1 .50 112 .7 71 .3 Rhame city, Bowman County0 .36 0 .36 1,469 .4 791 .7 Richardton city, Stark County1 .35 1 .35 151 .9 139 .3 Riverdale city, McLean County0 .17 0 .17 217 .6 329 .4 Robinson city, Kidder County0 .22 0 .22 459 .1 468 .2 Rocklake city, Towner County0 .98 0 .98 46 .9 28 .6 Rogers city, Barnes County0 .99 0 .99 600 .0 286 .9 Rolette city, Rolette County

1 .43 1 .43 895 .1 432 .9 Rolla city, Rolette County0 .28 0 .28 346 .4 192 .9 Ross city, Mountrail County1 .94 1 .94 1,482 .5 725 .3 Rugby city, Pierce County0 .25 0 .25 16 .0 12 .0 Ruso city, McLean County0 .15 0 .15 1,273 .3 760 .0 Ruthville CDP, Ward County0 .38 0 .38 428 .9 257 .9 Rutland city, Sargent County0 .34 0 .33 257 .6 187 .9 Ryder city, Ward County0 .45 0 .45 757 .8 335 .6 St . John city, Rolette County1 .06 1 .06 312 .3 171 .7 St . Thomas city, Pembina County0 .55 0 .55 349 .1 145 .5 Sanborn city, Barnes County

0 .22 0 .22 127 .3 122 .7 Sarles city0 .19 0 .19 126 .3 136 .8 Cavalier County0 .02 0 .02 200 .0 50 .0 Towner County0 .48 0 .48 743 .8 312 .5 Sawyer city, Ward County0 .90 0 .90 312 .2 163 .3 Scranton city, Bowman County0 .27 0 .27 592 .6 281 .5 Selfridge city, Sioux County0 .14 0 .14 328 .6 214 .3 Selz CDP, Pierce County1 .06 1 .04 53 .8 36 .5 Sentinel Butte city, Golden Valley County1 .55 1 .54 62 .3 47 .4 Sharon city, Steele County0 .22 0 .22 527 .3 277 .3 Sheldon city, Ransom County

15 .04 15 .00 79 .8 26 .2 Shell Valley CDP, Rolette County0 .31 0 .31 780 .6 429 .0 Sherwood city, Renville County0 .16 0 .16 1,275 .0 918 .8 Sheyenne city, Eddy County0 .04 0 .04 750 .0 1,250 .0 Sibley city, Barnes County0 .30 0 .30 276 .7 146 .7 Solen city, Sioux County0 .10 0 .10 580 .0 450 .0 Souris city, Bottineau County0 .95 0 .94 320 .2 137 .2 South Heart city, Stark County0 .88 0 .88 20 .5 21 .6 Spiritwood CDP, Stutsman County1 .79 1 .07 84 .1 92 .5 Spiritwood Lake city, Stutsman County0 .37 0 .37 73 .0 37 .8 Springbrook city, Williams County

1 .83 1 .82 801 .1 394 .5 Stanley city, Mountrail County0 .48 0 .47 778 .7 421 .3 Stanton city, Mercer County0 .14 0 .14 835 .7 528 .6 Starkweather city, Ramsey County







0 .28 0 .28 421 .4 225 .0 Oriska city, Barnes County0 .23 0 .23 95 .7 73 .9 Orrin CDP, Pierce County0 .30 0 .30 446 .7 243 .3 Osnabrock city, Cavalier County0 .36 0 .36 50 .0 30 .6 Overly city, Bottineau County0 .42 0 .42 726 .2 257 .1 Oxbow city, Cass County0 .18 0 .18 1,288 .9 672 .2 Page city, Cass County2 .21 2 .20 33 .6 30 .5 Palermo city, Mountrail County2 .17 2 .17 646 .5 338 .2 Park River city, Walsh County0 .55 0 .55 1,641 .8 661 .8 Parshall city, Mountrail County0 .25 0 .25 280 .0 200 .0 Pekin city, Nelson County

0 .77 0 .76 778 .9 367 .1 Pembina city, Pembina County0 .13 0 .13 69 .2 46 .2 Perth city, Towner County1 .04 1 .03 186 .4 96 .1 Petersburg city, Nelson County0 .17 0 .17 411 .8 364 .7 Pettibone city, Kidder County0 .18 0 .18 683 .3 733 .3 Pick City city, Mercer County0 .26 0 .26 46 .2 46 .2 Pillsbury city, Barnes County0 .18 0 .18 333 .3 161 .1 Pingree city, Stutsman County0 .12 0 .12 883 .3 500 .0 Pisek city, Walsh County1 .14 1 .12 152 .7 101 .8 Plaza city, Mountrail County0 .20 0 .20 730 .0 200 .0 Porcupine CDP, Sioux County

0 .56 0 .56 225 .0 142 .9 Portal city, Burke County0 .86 0 .86 704 .7 345 .3 Portland city, Traill County1 .23 0 .99 282 .8 173 .7 Powers Lake city, Burke County0 .04 0 .04 1,825 .0 650 .0 Prairie Rose city, Cass County0 .29 0 .29 41 .4 31 .0 Raleigh CDP, Grant County1 .04 1 .01 586 .1 298 .0 Ray city, Williams County0 .62 0 .62 261 .3 183 .9 Reeder city, Adams County1 .01 1 .01 42 .6 30 .7 Regan city, Burleigh County0 .56 0 .56 285 .7 214 .3 Regent city, Hettinger County0 .48 0 .48 1,068 .8 306 .3 Reile’s Acres city, Cass County

0 .67 0 .67 449 .3 189 .6 Reynolds city0 .25 0 .25 372 .0 176 .0 Grand Forks County0 .43 0 .43 483 .7 193 .0 Traill County1 .50 1 .50 112 .7 71 .3 Rhame city, Bowman County0 .36 0 .36 1,469 .4 791 .7 Richardton city, Stark County1 .35 1 .35 151 .9 139 .3 Riverdale city, McLean County0 .17 0 .17 217 .6 329 .4 Robinson city, Kidder County0 .22 0 .22 459 .1 468 .2 Rocklake city, Towner County0 .98 0 .98 46 .9 28 .6 Rogers city, Barnes County0 .99 0 .99 600 .0 286 .9 Rolette city, Rolette County

1 .43 1 .43 895 .1 432 .9 Rolla city, Rolette County0 .28 0 .28 346 .4 192 .9 Ross city, Mountrail County1 .94 1 .94 1,482 .5 725 .3 Rugby city, Pierce County0 .25 0 .25 16 .0 12 .0 Ruso city, McLean County0 .15 0 .15 1,273 .3 760 .0 Ruthville CDP, Ward County0 .38 0 .38 428 .9 257 .9 Rutland city, Sargent County0 .34 0 .33 257 .6 187 .9 Ryder city, Ward County0 .45 0 .45 757 .8 335 .6 St . John city, Rolette County1 .06 1 .06 312 .3 171 .7 St . Thomas city, Pembina County0 .55 0 .55 349 .1 145 .5 Sanborn city, Barnes County

0 .22 0 .22 127 .3 122 .7 Sarles city0 .19 0 .19 126 .3 136 .8 Cavalier County0 .02 0 .02 200 .0 50 .0 Towner County0 .48 0 .48 743 .8 312 .5 Sawyer city, Ward County0 .90 0 .90 312 .2 163 .3 Scranton city, Bowman County0 .27 0 .27 592 .6 281 .5 Selfridge city, Sioux County0 .14 0 .14 328 .6 214 .3 Selz CDP, Pierce County1 .06 1 .04 53 .8 36 .5 Sentinel Butte city, Golden Valley County1 .55 1 .54 62 .3 47 .4 Sharon city, Steele County0 .22 0 .22 527 .3 277 .3 Sheldon city, Ransom County

15 .04 15 .00 79 .8 26 .2 Shell Valley CDP, Rolette County0 .31 0 .31 780 .6 429 .0 Sherwood city, Renville County0 .16 0 .16 1,275 .0 918 .8 Sheyenne city, Eddy County0 .04 0 .04 750 .0 1,250 .0 Sibley city, Barnes County0 .30 0 .30 276 .7 146 .7 Solen city, Sioux County0 .10 0 .10 580 .0 450 .0 Souris city, Bottineau County0 .95 0 .94 320 .2 137 .2 South Heart city, Stark County0 .88 0 .88 20 .5 21 .6 Spiritwood CDP, Stutsman County1 .79 1 .07 84 .1 92 .5 Spiritwood Lake city, Stutsman County0 .37 0 .37 73 .0 37 .8 Springbrook city, Williams County

1 .83 1 .82 801 .1 394 .5 Stanley city, Mountrail County0 .48 0 .47 778 .7 421 .3 Stanton city, Mercer County0 .14 0 .14 835 .7 528 .6 Starkweather city, Ramsey County



2010 2000 1990


2010 2010 2000 1990


2010

Oriska city, Barnes County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 118 128 103 –7 .8 63 57 48 10 .5Orrin CDP, Pierce County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 (X) (X) (X) 17 (X) (X) (X)Osnabrock city, Cavalier County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 134 174 214 –23 .0 73 85 90 –14 .1Overly city, Bottineau County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 19 25 –5 .3 11 10 13 10 .0Oxbow city, Cass County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 305 248 100 23 .0 108 84 40 28 .6Page city, Cass County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 232 225 266 3 .1 121 125 144 –3 .2Palermo city, Mountrail County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74 77 95 –3 .9 67 53 60 26 .4Park River city, Walsh County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,403 1,535 1,725 –8 .6 734 760 793 –3 .4Parshall city, Mountrail County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 903 981 943 –8 .0 364 392 403 –7 .1Pekin city, Nelson County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70 80 101 –12 .5 50 63 70 –20 .6

Pembina city, Pembina County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 592 642 642 –7 .8 279 274 265 1 .8Perth city, Towner County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 13 22 –30 .8 6 6 13 –Petersburg city, Nelson County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 192 195 219 –1 .5 99 106 116 –6 .6Pettibone city, Kidder County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70 88 93 –20 .5 62 60 66 3 .3Pick City city, Mercer County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 123 166 203 –25 .9 132 117 129 12 .8Pillsbury city, Barnes County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 24 31 –50 .0 12 11 18 9 .1Pingree city, Stutsman County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60 66 61 –9 .1 29 32 36 –9 .4Pisek city, Walsh County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 106 96 130 10 .4 60 60 71 –Plaza city, Mountrail County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 171 167 193 2 .4 114 115 126 –0 .9Porcupine CDP, Sioux County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 146 (X) (X) (X) 40 (X) (X) (X)

Portal city, Burke County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 126 131 192 –3 .8 80 98 104 –18 .4Portland city, Traill County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 606 604 602 0 .3 297 286 268 3 .8Powers Lake city, Burke County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 280 309 408 –9 .4 172 183 221 –6 .0Prairie Rose city, Cass County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73 68 78 7 .4 26 20 23 30 .0Raleigh CDP, Grant County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 (X) (X) (X) 9 (X) (X) (X)Ray city, Williams County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 592 534 603 10 .9 301 296 316 1 .7Reeder city, Adams County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 162 181 252 –10 .5 114 130 136 –12 .3Regan city, Burleigh County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 43 51 – 31 32 29 –3 .1Regent city, Hettinger County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 160 211 268 –24 .2 120 126 142 –4 .8Reile’s Acres city, Cass County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 513 254 210 102 .0 147 72 56 104 .2

Reynolds city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 301 350 299 –14 .0 127 135 128 –5 .9 Grand Forks County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93 126 107 –26 .2 44 49 50 –10 .2 Traill County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 208 224 192 –7 .1 83 86 78 –3 .5Rhame city, Bowman County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 169 189 186 –10 .6 107 117 105 –8 .5Richardton city, Stark County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 529 619 625 –14 .5 285 285 290 –Riverdale city, McLean County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 205 273 283 –24 .9 188 157 135 19 .7Robinson city, Kidder County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 71 87 –47 .9 56 56 61 –Rocklake city, Towner County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 101 194 221 –47 .9 103 116 129 –11 .2Rogers city, Barnes County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 61 69 –24 .6 28 29 33 –3 .4Rolette city, Rolette County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 594 538 623 10 .4 284 286 298 –0 .7

Rolla city, Rolette County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,280 1,417 1,371 –9 .7 619 656 647 –5 .6Ross city, Mountrail County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 97 48 61 102 .1 54 29 40 86 .2Rugby city, Pierce County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,876 2,939 2,909 –2 .1 1,407 1,434 1,369 –1 .9Ruso city, McLean County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 6 8 –33 .3 3 3 5 –Ruthville CDP, Ward County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 191 (X) (X) (X) 114 (X) (X) (X)Rutland city, Sargent County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 163 220 212 –25 .9 98 102 115 –3 .9Ryder city, Ward County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85 92 121 –7 .6 62 67 72 –7 .5St . John city, Rolette County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 341 358 368 –4 .7 151 154 141 –1 .9St . Thomas city, Pembina County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 331 447 444 –26 .0 182 201 207 –9 .5Sanborn city, Barnes County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 192 194 164 –1 .0 80 80 80 –

Sarles city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 25 86 12 .0 27 44 57 –38 .6 Cavalier County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 22 83 9 .1 26 42 55 –38 .1 Towner County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 3 3 33 .3 1 2 2 –50 .0Sawyer city, Ward County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 357 377 319 –5 .3 150 162 143 –7 .4Scranton city, Bowman County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 281 304 294 –7 .6 147 139 155 5 .8Selfridge city, Sioux County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 160 223 242 –28 .3 76 85 108 –10 .6Selz CDP, Pierce County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 (X) (X) (X) 30 (X) (X) (X)Sentinel Butte city, Golden Valley County . . . . . . . . . . . . 56 62 79 –9 .7 38 44 45 –13 .6Sharon city, Steele County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96 109 119 –11 .9 73 76 79 –3 .9Sheldon city, Ransom County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 116 135 149 –14 .1 61 71 74 –14 .1

Shell Valley CDP, Rolette County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,197 395 343 203 .0 393 103 90 281 .6Sherwood city, Renville County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 242 255 286 –5 .1 133 138 144 –3 .6Sheyenne city, Eddy County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 204 318 272 –35 .8 147 187 155 –21 .4Sibley city, Barnes County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 46 41 –34 .8 50 59 53 –15 .3Solen city, Sioux County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83 86 92 –3 .5 44 43 42 2 .3Souris city, Bottineau County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58 83 97 –30 .1 45 46 57 –2 .2South Heart city, Stark County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 301 307 322 –2 .0 129 119 122 8 .4Spiritwood CDP, Stutsman County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 (X) (X) (X) 19 (X) (X) (X)Spiritwood Lake city, Stutsman County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90 72 61 25 .0 99 63 96 57 .1Springbrook city, Williams County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 26 29 3 .8 14 20 14 –30 .0

Stanley city, Mountrail County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,458 1,279 1,371 14 .0 718 664 678 8 .1Stanton city, Mercer County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 366 345 517 6 .1 198 198 230 –Starkweather city, Ramsey County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 117 157 197 –25 .5 74 89 88 –16 .9





2010 2000 1990


2010 2010 2000 1990


2010

Steele city, Kidder County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 715 761 762 –6 .0 362 367 351 –1 .4Strasburg city, Emmons County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 409 549 553 –25 .5 224 245 241 –8 .6Streeter city, Stutsman County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 170 172 161 –1 .2 125 125 140 –Surrey city, Ward County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 934 917 856 1 .9 335 313 302 7 .0Sutton CDP, Griggs County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 (X) (X) (X) 23 (X) (X) (X)Sykeston city, Wells County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 117 153 167 –23 .5 85 95 102 –10 .5Tappen city, Kidder County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 197 210 239 –6 .2 106 100 114 6 .0Taylor city, Stark County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 148 150 163 –1 .3 96 83 99 15 .7Thompson city, Grand Forks County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 986 1,006 930 –2 .0 362 339 294 6 .8Tioga city, Williams County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,230 1,125 1,278 9 .3 619 569 602 8 .8

Tolley city, Renville County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47 63 79 –25 .4 40 39 47 2 .6Tolna city, Nelson County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 166 202 230 –17 .8 109 118 122 –7 .6Tower City city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 253 252 233 0 .4 115 113 117 1 .8 Barnes County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . – – – – 1 1 2 – Cass County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 253 252 233 0 .4 114 112 115 1 .8Towner city, McHenry County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 533 574 669 –7 .1 337 335 362 0 .6Turtle Lake city, McLean County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 581 580 681 0 .2 340 329 364 3 .3Tuttle city, Kidder County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80 106 160 –24 .5 69 79 86 –12 .7Underwood city, McLean County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 778 812 976 –4 .2 377 381 464 –1 .0Upham city, McHenry County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 130 155 205 –16 .1 112 120 134 –6 .7

Valley City city, Barnes County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,585 6,826 7,163 –3 .5 3,307 3,250 3,222 1 .8Velva city, McHenry County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,084 1,049 968 3 .3 493 483 486 2 .1Venturia city, McIntosh County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 23 30 –56 .5 12 14 18 –14 .3Verona city, LaMoure County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85 108 103 –21 .3 47 53 53 –11 .3Voltaire city, McHenry County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 51 63 –21 .6 22 21 26 4 .8Wahpeton city, Richland County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,766 8,586 8,751 –9 .6 3,482 3,492 3,317 –0 .3Walcott city, Richland County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 235 189 178 24 .3 103 89 83 15 .7Wales city, Cavalier County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 30 48 3 .3 20 31 43 –35 .5Walhalla city, Pembina County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 996 1,057 1,131 –5 .8 515 556 552 –7 .4Warwick city, Benson County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65 75 80 –13 .3 32 47 49 –31 .9

Washburn city, McLean County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,246 1,389 1,506 –10 .3 661 659 654 0 .3Watford City city, McKenzie County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,744 1,435 1,784 21 .5 873 790 913 10 .5West Fargo city, Cass County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25,830 14,940 12,287 72 .9 10,760 5,968 4,574 80 .3Westhope city, Bottineau County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 429 533 578 –19 .5 218 268 246 –18 .7Wheatland CDP, Cass County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68 60 (X) 13 .3 33 28 (X) 17 .9White Earth city, Mountrail County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80 63 73 27 .0 37 27 57 37 .0White Shield CDP, McLean County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 336 348 274 –3 .4 112 108 96 3 .7Wildrose city, Williams County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 110 129 193 –14 .7 91 102 114 –10 .8Williston city, Williams County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14,716 12,512 13,136 17 .6 6,542 5,912 6,084 10 .7Willow City city, Bottineau County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 163 221 281 –26 .2 123 143 172 –14 .0

Wilton city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 711 807 728 –11 .9 358 347 323 3 .2 Burleigh County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 161 242 176 –33 .5 103 106 81 –2 .8 McLean County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 550 565 552 –2 .7 255 241 242 5 .8Wimbledon city, Barnes County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 216 237 275 –8 .9 119 126 140 –5 .6Wing city, Burleigh County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 152 124 208 22 .6 90 89 97 1 .1Wishek city, McIntosh County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,002 1,122 1,171 –10 .7 516 532 569 –3 .0Wolford city, Pierce County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 50 56 –28 .0 27 30 33 –10 .0Woodworth city, Stutsman County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 80 102 –37 .5 52 56 63 –7 .1Wyndmere city, Richland County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 429 533 501 –19 .5 226 247 232 –8 .5York city, Benson County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 26 35 –11 .5 23 32 35 –28 .1

Ypsilanti CDP, Stutsman County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 104 (X) (X) (X) 52 (X) (X) (X)Zap city, Mercer County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 237 231 287 2 .6 135 129 162 4 .7Zeeland city, McIntosh County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 86 141 197 –39 .0 99 103 114 –3 .9





0 .57 0 .57 1,254 .4 635 .1 Steele city, Kidder County0 .30 0 .30 1,363 .3 746 .7 Strasburg city, Emmons County0 .35 0 .35 485 .7 357 .1 Streeter city, Stutsman County0 .99 0 .98 953 .1 341 .8 Surrey city, Ward County0 .20 0 .20 85 .0 115 .0 Sutton CDP, Griggs County0 .38 0 .38 307 .9 223 .7 Sykeston city, Wells County1 .05 1 .05 187 .6 101 .0 Tappen city, Kidder County0 .50 0 .50 296 .0 192 .0 Taylor city, Stark County0 .46 0 .46 2,143 .5 787 .0 Thompson city, Grand Forks County1 .39 1 .31 938 .9 472 .5 Tioga city, Williams County

0 .13 0 .13 361 .5 307 .7 Tolley city, Renville County0 .76 0 .76 218 .4 143 .4 Tolna city, Nelson County2 .08 2 .08 121 .6 55 .3 Tower City city0 .62 0 .62 – 1 .6 Barnes County1 .46 1 .46 173 .3 78 .1 Cass County0 .81 0 .81 658 .0 416 .0 Towner city, McHenry County0 .52 0 .51 1,139 .2 666 .7 Turtle Lake city, McLean County0 .25 0 .25 320 .0 276 .0 Tuttle city, Kidder County0 .91 0 .91 854 .9 414 .3 Underwood city, McLean County0 .33 0 .33 393 .9 339 .4 Upham city, McHenry County

3 .46 3 .46 1,903 .2 955 .8 Valley City city, Barnes County0 .83 0 .83 1,306 .0 594 .0 Velva city, McHenry County0 .06 0 .06 166 .7 200 .0 Venturia city, McIntosh County0 .25 0 .25 340 .0 188 .0 Verona city, LaMoure County0 .40 0 .40 100 .0 55 .0 Voltaire city, McHenry County5 .29 5 .29 1,468 .1 658 .2 Wahpeton city, Richland County1 .02 1 .02 230 .4 101 .0 Walcott city, Richland County0 .24 0 .23 134 .8 87 .0 Wales city, Cavalier County1 .07 1 .05 948 .6 490 .5 Walhalla city, Pembina County

1 .00 0 .65 100 .0 49 .2 Warwick city, Benson County

1 .89 1 .79 696 .1 369 .3 Washburn city, McLean County1 .42 1 .40 1,245 .7 623 .6 Watford City city, McKenzie County

14 .71 14 .44 1,788 .8 745 .2 West Fargo city, Cass County0 .33 0 .33 1,300 .0 660 .6 Westhope city, Bottineau County4 .01 4 .01 17 .0 8 .2 Wheatland CDP, Cass County1 .50 1 .50 53 .3 24 .7 White Earth city, Mountrail County3 .80 3 .80 88 .4 29 .5 White Shield CDP, McLean County0 .29 0 .29 379 .3 313 .8 Wildrose city, Williams County7 .56 7 .50 1,962 .1 872 .3 Williston city, Williams County0 .45 0 .45 362 .2 273 .3 Willow City city, Bottineau County

0 .64 0 .63 1,128 .6 568 .3 Wilton city0 .26 0 .25 644 .0 412 .0 Burleigh County0 .38 0 .38 1,447 .4 671 .1 McLean County0 .53 0 .53 407 .5 224 .5 Wimbledon city, Barnes County0 .59 0 .59 257 .6 152 .5 Wing city, Burleigh County1 .45 1 .44 695 .8 358 .3 Wishek city, McIntosh County0 .16 0 .16 225 .0 168 .8 Wolford city, Pierce County0 .22 0 .22 227 .3 236 .4 Woodworth city, Stutsman County0 .88 0 .88 487 .5 256 .8 Wyndmere city, Richland County0 .23 0 .23 100 .0 100 .0 York city, Benson County

0 .55 0 .55 189 .1 94 .5 Ypsilanti CDP, Stutsman County1 .05 1 .04 227 .9 129 .8 Zap city, Mercer County0 .30 0 .30 286 .7 330 .0 Zeeland city, McIntosh County







0 .57 0 .57 1,254 .4 635 .1 Steele city, Kidder County0 .30 0 .30 1,363 .3 746 .7 Strasburg city, Emmons County0 .35 0 .35 485 .7 357 .1 Streeter city, Stutsman County0 .99 0 .98 953 .1 341 .8 Surrey city, Ward County0 .20 0 .20 85 .0 115 .0 Sutton CDP, Griggs County0 .38 0 .38 307 .9 223 .7 Sykeston city, Wells County1 .05 1 .05 187 .6 101 .0 Tappen city, Kidder County0 .50 0 .50 296 .0 192 .0 Taylor city, Stark County0 .46 0 .46 2,143 .5 787 .0 Thompson city, Grand Forks County1 .39 1 .31 938 .9 472 .5 Tioga city, Williams County

0 .13 0 .13 361 .5 307 .7 Tolley city, Renville County0 .76 0 .76 218 .4 143 .4 Tolna city, Nelson County2 .08 2 .08 121 .6 55 .3 Tower City city0 .62 0 .62 – 1 .6 Barnes County1 .46 1 .46 173 .3 78 .1 Cass County0 .81 0 .81 658 .0 416 .0 Towner city, McHenry County0 .52 0 .51 1,139 .2 666 .7 Turtle Lake city, McLean County0 .25 0 .25 320 .0 276 .0 Tuttle city, Kidder County0 .91 0 .91 854 .9 414 .3 Underwood city, McLean County0 .33 0 .33 393 .9 339 .4 Upham city, McHenry County

3 .46 3 .46 1,903 .2 955 .8 Valley City city, Barnes County0 .83 0 .83 1,306 .0 594 .0 Velva city, McHenry County0 .06 0 .06 166 .7 200 .0 Venturia city, McIntosh County0 .25 0 .25 340 .0 188 .0 Verona city, LaMoure County0 .40 0 .40 100 .0 55 .0 Voltaire city, McHenry County5 .29 5 .29 1,468 .1 658 .2 Wahpeton city, Richland County1 .02 1 .02 230 .4 101 .0 Walcott city, Richland County0 .24 0 .23 134 .8 87 .0 Wales city, Cavalier County1 .07 1 .05 948 .6 490 .5 Walhalla city, Pembina County1 .00 0 .65 100 .0 49 .2 Warwick city, Benson County

1 .89 1 .79 696 .1 369 .3 Washburn city, McLean County1 .42 1 .40 1,245 .7 623 .6 Watford City city, McKenzie County

14 .71 14 .44 1,788 .8 745 .2 West Fargo city, Cass County0 .33 0 .33 1,300 .0 660 .6 Westhope city, Bottineau County4 .01 4 .01 17 .0 8 .2 Wheatland CDP, Cass County1 .50 1 .50 53 .3 24 .7 White Earth city, Mountrail County3 .80 3 .80 88 .4 29 .5 White Shield CDP, McLean County0 .29 0 .29 379 .3 313 .8 Wildrose city, Williams County7 .56 7 .50 1,962 .1 872 .3 Williston city, Williams County0 .45 0 .45 362 .2 273 .3 Willow City city, Bottineau County

0 .64 0 .63 1,128 .6 568 .3 Wilton city0 .26 0 .25 644 .0 412 .0 Burleigh County0 .38 0 .38 1,447 .4 671 .1 McLean County0 .53 0 .53 407 .5 224 .5 Wimbledon city, Barnes County0 .59 0 .59 257 .6 152 .5 Wing city, Burleigh County1 .45 1 .44 695 .8 358 .3 Wishek city, McIntosh County0 .16 0 .16 225 .0 168 .8 Wolford city, Pierce County0 .22 0 .22 227 .3 236 .4 Woodworth city, Stutsman County0 .88 0 .88 487 .5 256 .8 Wyndmere city, Richland County0 .23 0 .23 100 .0 100 .0 York city, Benson County

0 .55 0 .55 189 .1 94 .5 Ypsilanti CDP, Stutsman County1 .05 1 .04 227 .9 129 .8 Zap city, Mercer County0 .30 0 .30 286 .7 330 .0 Zeeland city, McIntosh County



2010 2000 1990


2010 2010 2000 1990


2010

Steele city, Kidder County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 715 761 762 –6 .0 362 367 351 –1 .4Strasburg city, Emmons County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 409 549 553 –25 .5 224 245 241 –8 .6Streeter city, Stutsman County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 170 172 161 –1 .2 125 125 140 –Surrey city, Ward County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 934 917 856 1 .9 335 313 302 7 .0Sutton CDP, Griggs County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 (X) (X) (X) 23 (X) (X) (X)Sykeston city, Wells County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 117 153 167 –23 .5 85 95 102 –10 .5Tappen city, Kidder County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 197 210 239 –6 .2 106 100 114 6 .0Taylor city, Stark County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 148 150 163 –1 .3 96 83 99 15 .7Thompson city, Grand Forks County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 986 1,006 930 –2 .0 362 339 294 6 .8Tioga city, Williams County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,230 1,125 1,278 9 .3 619 569 602 8 .8

Tolley city, Renville County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47 63 79 –25 .4 40 39 47 2 .6Tolna city, Nelson County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 166 202 230 –17 .8 109 118 122 –7 .6Tower City city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 253 252 233 0 .4 115 113 117 1 .8 Barnes County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . – – – – 1 1 2 – Cass County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 253 252 233 0 .4 114 112 115 1 .8Towner city, McHenry County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 533 574 669 –7 .1 337 335 362 0 .6Turtle Lake city, McLean County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 581 580 681 0 .2 340 329 364 3 .3Tuttle city, Kidder County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80 106 160 –24 .5 69 79 86 –12 .7Underwood city, McLean County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 778 812 976 –4 .2 377 381 464 –1 .0Upham city, McHenry County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 130 155 205 –16 .1 112 120 134 –6 .7

Valley City city, Barnes County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,585 6,826 7,163 –3 .5 3,307 3,250 3,222 1 .8Velva city, McHenry County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,084 1,049 968 3 .3 493 483 486 2 .1Venturia city, McIntosh County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 23 30 –56 .5 12 14 18 –14 .3Verona city, LaMoure County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85 108 103 –21 .3 47 53 53 –11 .3Voltaire city, McHenry County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 51 63 –21 .6 22 21 26 4 .8Wahpeton city, Richland County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,766 8,586 8,751 –9 .6 3,482 3,492 3,317 –0 .3Walcott city, Richland County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 235 189 178 24 .3 103 89 83 15 .7Wales city, Cavalier County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 30 48 3 .3 20 31 43 –35 .5Walhalla city, Pembina County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 996 1,057 1,131 –5 .8 515 556 552 –7 .4Warwick city, Benson County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65 75 80 –13 .3 32 47 49 –31 .9

Washburn city, McLean County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,246 1,389 1,506 –10 .3 661 659 654 0 .3Watford City city, McKenzie County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,744 1,435 1,784 21 .5 873 790 913 10 .5West Fargo city, Cass County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25,830 14,940 12,287 72 .9 10,760 5,968 4,574 80 .3Westhope city, Bottineau County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 429 533 578 –19 .5 218 268 246 –18 .7Wheatland CDP, Cass County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68 60 (X) 13 .3 33 28 (X) 17 .9White Earth city, Mountrail County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80 63 73 27 .0 37 27 57 37 .0White Shield CDP, McLean County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 336 348 274 –3 .4 112 108 96 3 .7Wildrose city, Williams County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 110 129 193 –14 .7 91 102 114 –10 .8Williston city, Williams County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14,716 12,512 13,136 17 .6 6,542 5,912 6,084 10 .7Willow City city, Bottineau County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 163 221 281 –26 .2 123 143 172 –14 .0

Wilton city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 711 807 728 –11 .9 358 347 323 3 .2 Burleigh County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 161 242 176 –33 .5 103 106 81 –2 .8 McLean County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 550 565 552 –2 .7 255 241 242 5 .8Wimbledon city, Barnes County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 216 237 275 –8 .9 119 126 140 –5 .6Wing city, Burleigh County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 152 124 208 22 .6 90 89 97 1 .1Wishek city, McIntosh County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,002 1,122 1,171 –10 .7 516 532 569 –3 .0Wolford city, Pierce County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 50 56 –28 .0 27 30 33 –10 .0Woodworth city, Stutsman County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 80 102 –37 .5 52 56 63 –7 .1Wyndmere city, Richland County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 429 533 501 –19 .5 226 247 232 –8 .5York city, Benson County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 26 35 –11 .5 23 32 35 –28 .1

Ypsilanti CDP, Stutsman County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 104 (X) (X) (X) 52 (X) (X) (X)Zap city, Mercer County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 237 231 287 2 .6 135 129 162 4 .7Zeeland city, McIntosh County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 86 141 197 –39 .0 99 103 114 –3 .9


Table 10. Rank by 2010 Population and Housing Units: 2000 and 2010 [For information concerning historical counts and geographic change, see “User Notes .” For information on confidentiality, nonsampling error, and definitions, see Appendixes]

Place [2,500 or More Population]Population Housing units

2010 rank 2010 2000 2010 rank 2010 2000

Fargo city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 105,549 90,599 1 49,956 41,200Bismarck city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 61,272 r 55,392 2 28,648 r 24,218Grand Forks city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 52,838 r 49,366 3 23,449 r 20,873Minot city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 40,888 36,567 4 18,744 16,475West Fargo city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 25,830 14,940 5 10,760 5,968Mandan city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 18,331 16,718 6 7,950 6,958Dickinson city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 17,787 16,010 7 7,865 7,033Jamestown city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 15,427 15,527 8 6,983 6,970Williston city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 14,716 12,512 9 6,542 5,912Wahpeton city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 7,766 8,586 10 3,482 3,492

Devils Lake city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 7,141 7,222 11 3,481 3,508Valley City city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 6,585 6,826 12 3,307 3,250Minot AFB CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 5,521 7,599 15 1,463 2,441Grafton city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 4,284 4,516 13 1,990 2,005Beulah city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 3,121 3,152 14 1,508 1,475Rugby city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 2,876 2,939 16 1,407 1,434


Table 11. Rank of Places by Percent Change in Population: 2000 to 2010 [For information concerning historical counts and geographic change, see “User Notes .” For information on confidentiality, nonsampling error, and definitions, see Appendixes]

Population Percent changePlace [2,500 or More Population]

2010 2000 Rank Percent

West Fargo city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25,830 14,940 1 72 .89Williston city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14,716 12,512 2 17 .62Fargo city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105,549 90,599 3 16 .50Minot city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40,888 36,567 4 11 .82Dickinson city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17,787 16,010 5 11 .10Bismarck city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61,272 r 55,392 6 10 .62Mandan city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18,331 16,718 7 9 .65Grand Forks city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52,838 r 49,366 8 7 .03Jamestown city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15,427 15,527 9 –0 .64Beulah city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,121 3,152 10 –0 .98

Devils Lake city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,141 7,222 11 –1 .12Rugby city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,876 2,939 12 –2 .14Valley City city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,585 6,826 13 –3 .53Grafton city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,284 4,516 14 –5 .14Wahpeton city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,766 8,586 15 –9 .55Minot AFB CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,521 7,599 16 –27 .35


Table 12. Population and Housing Units for Urban Areas: 2010[For information on confidentiality, nonsampling error, and definitions, see Appendixes]

StateUrbanized AreaUrban Cluster

State total Total for urban areas crossing state lines

Population Housing units Population Housing units

North Dakota . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 672,591 317,498 (X) (X)

Urban . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 402,872 182,040 (X) (X)In urbanized area . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 269,056 122,440 (X) (X)In urban cluster . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 133,816 59,600 (X) (X) Rural . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 269,719 135,458 (X) (X)

URBANIZED AREA

Bismarck, ND . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81,955 37,317 (X) (X)Fargo, ND--MN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 134,149 61,615 176,676 78,728Grand Forks, ND--MN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52,952 23,508 61,270 27,032

URBAN CLUSTER

Beulah, ND . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,949 1,442 (X) (X)Devils Lake, ND . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,444 3,586 (X) (X)Dickinson, ND . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17,586 7,761 (X) (X)Grafton, ND . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,219 1,956 (X) (X)Grand Forks AFB, ND . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,697 989 (X) (X)Jamestown, ND . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15,284 6,920 (X) (X)Lincoln, ND . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,992 1,047 (X) (X)Minot, ND . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42,650 19,484 (X) (X)Minot AFB, ND . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,521 1,463 (X) (X)Rugby, ND . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,824 1,382 (X) (X)

Valley City, ND . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,689 3,342 (X) (X)Wahpeton, ND--MN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,834 3,509 11,113 5,065Williston, ND . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15,127 6,719 (X) (X)

Appendixes U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

Appendixes

Several appendixes traditionally found in printed reports are now available in a separate volume. For the following, see CPH-2-A, Population and Housing Unit Counts, Selected Appendixes, in print or on the Internet at <www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/cph-2-a.pdf> :

Appendix A. Geographic Terms and ConceptsAppendix B. Definitions of Subject CharacteristicsAppendix C. Data Collection and Processing ProceduresAppendix D. QuestionnaireAppendix F. Operational Overview and Accuracy of the DataAppendix G. Residence Rule and Residence Situations for the 2010 Census of the United StatesAppendix H. Acknowledgments

This Appendix section contains:

Appendix E. Maps

Maps North Dakota E-1U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

Appendix E. Maps

CANA

DA

RANS

OM

RENV

ILLE

ROLE

TTE

SARG

ENT

SHER

IDAN

SLOP

E

STAR

K

STUT

SMAN

TOW

NER

ADAM

S

BARN

ES

BENS

ON

BILL

INGS

BOTT

INEA

U

BOW

MAN

CASS

EDDY

GRAN

D FO

RKS

GRAN

T

McI

NTOS

H

McK

ENZI

E

MOR

TON

PEM

BINA

RAM

SEY

RICH

LAND

SIOU

X

STEE

LETR

AILL

WAL

SHW

ILLIA

MS

BURK

E

BURL

EIGH

CAVA

LIER

DICK

EY

DIVI

DE

DUNN

EMM

ONS

FOST

ER

GOLD

ENVA

LLEY

GRIG

GS

HETT

INGE

R

KIDD

ER

LaM

OURE

LOGA

N

McH

ENRY

MER

CER

MOU

NTRA

IL

NELS

ON

OLIV

ER

PIER

CEW

ARD

WEL

LSM

cLEA

N

MO

NTA

NA

MIN

NE

SO

TA

SO

UTH

DA

KO

TA

100°

100°

97°

97°

98°

98°

99°

99°

101°10

1°

102°

102°

103°

103°

104°

104°

49°

49°

48°

48°

47°

47°

46°

46°

45°

45°

Counties

LEG

END

CANA

DAIn

tern

atio

nal

MO

NTA

NA

Stat

eBU

RLEI

GHC

ount

yN

ote:

All

boun

darie

s an

d na

mes

are

as

of J

anua

ry 1

, 201

0.

020

4060

Kilo

met

ers

020

4060

Mile

s

E-2 North Dakota MapsU.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

Geographic Areas Reference Map Legend, Section Locator, and Location Index

DUNN

CASS

WARD

McLEANMcKENZIE

GRANT

MORTON

WILLIAMS

STARK

STUTSMAN

McHENRY

WELLS

SLOPE

BARNESKIDDER

WALSH

DIVIDE

SIOUX

EMMONS

BENSON

BURKE

BURLEIGH

MOUNTRAIL RAMSEY

CAVALIER

DICKEY

PIERCE

BOTTINEAU

LOGAN

ADAMS

RICHLAND

MERCER

NELSON

BOWMAN

BILLINGS

PEMBINA

TRAILL

LaMOURE

EDDY

TOWNER

ROLETTE

RANSOM

GRANDFORKS

OLIVER

HETTINGER

STEELESHERIDAN

SARGENTMcINTOSH

GRIGGSFOSTER

RENVILLE

GOLDENVALLEY

64

3

5

21

9

7

811

10

Geographic Areas Reference Map Legend

Census Designated Place

Large River, Lake, Water Body,or Shoreline

Zena

Lake Erie

American Indian Reservation(Federal)1CAMPO

Off-Reservation Trust LandZIA

Inset

A fishhook joins contiguous and/or discontiguousparts of the same geographic entity.

SEE INSET A

LEGENDADAMS County

1 Map Section

2 A ’°’ following a place name indicates that the place is an independent place or independent city. An independent place is not part of any legal county subdivision and thusserves as the statistical equivalent of a legal county subdivision. An independent city is not part of any county or legal county subdivision and thus serves as both the statisticalequivalent of a county and a legal county subdivision. The name for the county subdivision is always the same as that of the place and never shown separately on the map.

State

Incorporated Place2ROME

YORK County Subdivision2

CountyERIE

International

Section Locator

Note: All legal and statistical area boundaries and names are as of January 1, 2010. Where international, state, county, independent city, and/or county subdivision boundariescoincide, the map shows the boundary symbol for the highest level of these geographic entities. The county and independent city boundaries are always shown. Where a countysubdivision boundary symbol coincides with a place boundary, the map does not show the place boundary symbol. Where American Indian Reservation (Federal), American IndianReservation (State), State Designated Tribal Statistical Area, and/or Tribal Designated Statistical Area boundaries coincide with a county subdivision boundary, the map does notshow the county subdivision boundary symbol. Any geographic entity name may include ’(pt)’ if some portion of the entity extends beyond the limits of the map area displayed onthe page, or if multiple discontiguous pieces of the entity have been discretely labeled on the page. A geographic entity name may include ’(pts)’ if many discontiguous piecesexist for that entity that cannot be discretely labeled. The boundaries shown on this map are for Census Bureau statistical data collection and tabulation purposes only; theirdepiction and designation for statistical purposes does not constitute a determination of jurisdictional authority or rights of ownership or entitlement.

1 A ’ ’ following an American Indian area name indicates that tribal subdivisions are defined for that area. The tribal subdivision boundaries are displayed on the tribal subdivisionmap(s) immediately following the geographic areas reference maps.

**


COUNTY MAPSEC

Adams 8Barnes 6Benson 3Billings 4Bottineau 2Bowman 8Burke 1Burleigh 5Cass 11Cavalier 3Dickey 10Divide 1Dunn 4Eddy 6Emmons 9Foster 6Golden Valley 4Grand Forks 7Grant 9Griggs 6Hettinger 8Kidder 6LaMoure 10Logan 10McHenry 2McIntosh 10McKenzie 4McLean 5Mercer 5Morton 9Mountrail 1Nelson 3Oliver 5Pembina 7Pierce 3Ramsey 3Ransom 11Renville 2Richland 11Rolette 3Sargent 11Sheridan 5Sioux 9Slope 8Stark 4Steele 6Stutsman 6Towner 3Traill 7Walsh 7Ward 2Wells 6Williams 1

Map section numbers refer to the geographic areas reference maps only.This list presents the map section numbers for each county in the state.

County Location Index

Geographic Areas Reference Map Legend, Section Locator, and Location Index


BU

RK

E

DIV

IDE

MO

UN

TRA

IL

WIL

LIA

MS

CLE

AR

-W

ATE

R

WIL

LIS

-TO

N

CO

LUM

-B

US°

CR

OSB

Y°

BO

WB

ELLS

°

ALA

MO

°

AM

BR

OSE

°

GR

ENO

RA

°

EPPI

NG

°

FLA

XTO

N°

FORT

UN

A°

LIG

NIT

E°

NEW

TOW

N°

NO

ON

AN

°

SPR

ING

-B

RO

OK

°ST

AN

LEY

°

PALE

RM

O° PA

R-

SHA

LL°

PLA

ZA°

PORT

AL°

POW

ERS

LAK

E°

RAY

°

RO

SS°

TIO

GA

°W

HIT

EEA

RTH

°

WIL

DR

OSE

°

WIL

LIS-

TON

°

Lars

on

FOR

T B

ERTH

OLD

* (pt

)

TUR

TLE

MO

UN

TAIN

(pts

)

TUR

TLE

MO

UN

TAIN

(pt)

TUR

TLE

MO

UN

TAIN

(pts

)

TUR

TLE

MO

UN

TAIN

(pts

)

TUR

TLE

MO

UN

TAIN

(pts

)

TUR

TLE

MO

UN

-TA

IN(p

t)

BATTLE

VIEW

BO

W-

BE

LLS

CA

RTE

R

CLA

YTO

N

CLE

AR

Y

CO

LVIL

LE

DA

LE DIM

ON

D

FAY

FOO

THIL

LS

FOR

THU

N

GA

RN

ES

S

HARMONIOUS

KA

ND

I-Y

OH

I

KE

LLE

R

LAKEVIE

W

LEAF

MO

UN

TAIN

LUC

Y

MIN

NE

SO

TA

NO

RTH

BU

RK

E

NO

RTH

STA

RP

OR

TAL

RIC

HLA

ND

RO

SE

-LA

ND

SH

OR

TC

RE

EK

SO

O

THO

RS

ON

VALE

VAN

VIL

LE

WA

RD

ALE

X-

AN

DR

IA

AM

BR

OS

EB

LOO

MIN

GP

RA

IRIE

BLO

OM

ING

VALL

EY

BO

RD

ER

BU

RG

CLI

NTO

N

CO

AL-

FIE

LDD

AN

EV

ILLE

DE

WIT

TE

LKH

OR

N

FER

TILE

VA

LLE

Y

FILL

MO

RE

FRA

ZIE

R

FRE

D-

ER

ICK

GA

RN

ET

GO

OS

E-

NE

CK

HAW

KE

YE

HAY

LAN

D

LIN

CO

LNVA

LLE

Y

LON

GC

RE

EK

ME

NTO

R

PALM

ER

PLU

ME

R

SIO

UX

TRA

ILS

MO

KY

BU

TTE

STONEVIE

W

TRO

YTW

INB

UTT

E

UP

LAN

D

WE

STB

Y

WR

ITIN

GR

OC

K

ALG

ER

AU

STI

N

BA

NN

ER

BIC

KE

R

BIG

BE

NDB

RO

OK

-B

AN

K

BU

RK

E

CO

TTO

N-

WO

OD

CR

AN

EC

RE

EK

CR

OW

-FO

OT

DE

BIN

G

EG

AN

FER

TILE

HO

WIE

IDA

HO

JAM

ES

HIL

L

KIC

KA

PO

O

KN

IFE

RIV

ER

LIB

-E

RTY

LOS

T-W

OO

DLO

WLA

ND

McA

LMO

ND

McG

AH

AN

MA

NIT

OU

MO

DE

L

MO

UN

T-R

AIL

MY

RTL

E

OA

KLA

ND

OS

-B

OR

N

OS

LOE

PALE

RM

O

PAR

SH

ALL

PLA

ZA

PO

WE

RS

PO

WE

RS

LAK

E

PU

RC

ELL

RAT

LAK

E

RE

DM

ON

D

RO

SS

SH

ELL

SID

ON

IA

SIK

ES

SO

RK

-N

ES

S

SO

UTH

WE

ST

MO

UN

TRA

IL

SP

RIN

GC

OU

LEE

STA

VE

VAN

HO

OKW

AYZE

TTA

WE

ST

MO

UN

T-R

AIL

WH

ITE

EA

RTH

RO

CK

ISLA

ND

RO

UN

DP

RA

IRIE

SA

UK

VALL

EY

SC

OR

IO

SO

UTH

EA

ST

WIL

LIA

MS

SO

UTH

ME

AD

OW

SP

RIN

G-

BR

OO

K

STO

NY

CR

EE

K

STR

AN

-D

AH

LTI

OG

A

TRE

NTO

N

TRU

AX

TWE

LVE

MIL

E

TYR

ON

E

VIE

W

WE

ST

BA

NK

WH

EE

-LO

CK

WIN

NE

R

ATH

EN

S

BA

RR

BU

TTE

BIG

ME

AD

OW

BIG

STO

NE

BLA

CK

-TA

IL

BLU

ER

IDG

E

BO

NE

-TR

AIL

L

BR

OO

KLY

N

BU

FOR

D

BU

LLB

UTT

E

CH

AM

PIO

N

CLI

MA

X

CO

WC

RE

EK

DR

YFO

RK

DU

BLI

N

EA

ST

FOR

KELL

ISV

ILLE

EQ

UA

LITY

FAR

MVA

LE

GO

LDE

NVA

LLE

Y

GO

OD

LUC

K

GR

ENO

RA

HA

RD

-S

CR

AB

BLE

HA

ZEL

HE

BR

ON

JUD

SO

N

LIN

DA

HL

MA

RS

HA

LL

MIS

SO

UR

IR

IDG

EM

ON

T

NE

WH

OM

E

OLI

VE

R

OR

THE

LL

PH

ER

RIN

PLE

AS

AN

TVA

LLE

Y

RA

INB

OW

SEE

SEC

TIO

N 2

SEE

SEC

TIO

N 4

SEE

SEC

TIO

N 5

Lake

Sak

akaw

ea

American Indian Areas, Counties, County Subdivisions, and Places - Section 1

04

812

Kilo

met

ers

04

812

Mile

s

102°

102°

102°

30’10

2°30

’

103°

103°

103°

30’

103°

30’

104°

104°

49°

49°

48°30’

48°30’

48°

48°


BO

TTIN

EAU

McH

ENRY

REN

VILL

E

WA

RD

MINOT°

WATER-

FORD

BA

LFO

UR

°

BA

NTR

Y°

BER

GEN

°

BER

THO

LD°

BO

TTI-

NEA

U°

BU

RLI

NG

-TO

N°

CA

RPI

O°

AN

A-

MO

OSE

°

AN

TLER

°

GR

AN

O°

GR

AN

-V

ILLE

°

DEE

RIN

G°

DES

LAC

S°

DO

NN

Y-B

RO

OK

°

DO

UG

LAS°

DR

AK

E°

GA

RD

ENA

°

GLE

N-

BU

RN

°

LOR

AIN

E°

KA

RLS

-R

UH

E°

KEN

MA

RE°

KIE

F°

KR

AM

ER°

LAN

DA

°

LAN

S-FO

RD

°

MA

K-

OTI

°

MA

XB

ASS

°

NEW

-B

UR

G°

MO

HA

LL°

SOU

RIS

°

SUR

REY

°

OV

ERLY

°

RYD

ER°

SAW

YER

°

SHER

-W

OO

D°

TOLL

EY°

TOW

NER

°

UPH

AM

°

VEL

VA°

VO

LTA

IRE°

WES

T-H

OPE

°

WIL

LOW

CIT

Y°

Foxh

olm

Loga

n

Min

otA

FB

Rut

hvill

e

FOR

TB

ERTH

OLD

* (pt

)

TURTLE

MOUNTAIN

(pt)

AMITY

ANTLER

BENTINCK

BLAINE

BRANDER

CECIL

CHAT-

FIELD

COR-

DELIA

CUT

BANK

DALEN

EIDSVOLD

ELMS

ELYSIAN

HARAM

HASTINGS

HOFFMAN

HOMEN

KANE

LANSFORD

LEWIS

LORDS-

BURG

MOUNT

ROSE

NEWBORG

OAK

CREEK

OAK

VALLEY

OSTBY

PEABODY

PICKER-

ING

RENVILLE

RICHBURG

ROLAND

SCANDIA

SCOTIA

SERGIUS

SHERMAN

STARBUCK

STONE

CREEK

TACOMA

WAYNE

WELLINGTON

WHEATON

WHITBY

WHIT-

TERON

WILLOW

VALE

ANA-

MOOSE

BALFOUR

BANTRY

BERWICK

BJORN-

SON

NORTH

PRAIRIE

NORWICH

ODIN

OLIVIA

BROWN

COTTON-

WOOD

LAKE

DEEP

RIVER

DEERING

LAKE

GEORGE

LAKE

HESTER

LAND

LAYTON

LEBANON

PRATT

RIGA

ROSE

HILL

ROUND

LAKE

SALINE

DENBIGH

EAST

McHENRY

EGG

CREEK

FALSEN

GILMORE

GRANVILLE

LITTLE

DEEP

MEADOW

MOUSE

RIVER

NEWPORTNORMAL

NORTHEAST

McHENRY

SCHILLER

SPRING

GROVE

STREGE

VELVA

VILLARD

GRILLEY

HENDRICK-

SON

KARLS-

RUHE

KOTTKE

VALLEY

BRANDON

CALLAHAN

CLAY

COLQU-

HOUN

EDEN

VALLEY

ENSIGN

FAIR-

BANKS

GRASS-

LAND

GROVER

HAMERLY

HAMLET

HURLEY

IVANHOE

LOCK-

WOOD

McKINNEY

MUSKEGO

PLAIN

PRESCOTT

PROS-

PERITY

ROCKFORD

ROOSE-

VELT

STAFFORD

VAN

BUREN

WHITE

ASH

VOLTAIRE

WAGAR

WILLOW

CREEK

RICE

LAKE

ROLLING

GREEN

RUSH-

VILLE

RYDER

ST.

MARYS

SAUK

PRAIRIE

SAW

YER

SHEALY

SPENCER

SPRING

LAKE

SUNDRE

SURREY

TATMAN

TOLGEN

TORNING

VANG

WILLIS

AFTON

ANNA

BADEN

BERTHOLD

BRILLIAN

BURLING-

TON

BURT

CAMERON

CARBON-

DALE

CARPIO

DEN-

MARK

DES

LACS

ELMDALE

EUREKA

EVER-

GREEN

FOXHOLM

FREEDOM

GASMAN

GREELY

GREEN-

BUSH

HARRISON

HIDDENWOOD

HILTON

IOTA

FLAT

KENMARE

KIRKELIE

LINTON

LUND

McKINLEY

MANDAN

MARG-

ARET MARY-

LAND

MAYLAND

NEDROSE

NEWMAN

NEW

PRAIRIE

ORLIEN

PASSPORT

REE

SEE

SEC

TIO

N 1

SEE

SEC

TIO

N 3

SEE

SEC

TIO

N 5


100°

100°

100°

30’

100°

30’

101°10

1°

101°

30’

101°

30’

102°

102°

102°

30’10

2°30

’

49°

49°

48°30’

48°30’

48°

48°

04

812

Kilo

met

ers

04

812

Mile

s


BEN

SON

CAV

ALI

ER

NEL

SON

PIER

CE

RA

MSE

Y

RO

LETT

E

TOW

NER

TUR

TLE

MO

UN

TAIN

(pt)

DEV

ILS

LAK

E°

SO

UTH

MIN

NE

-W

AU

KA

N

BR

INS-

MA

DE°

MIN

NE-

WA

UK

AN

°

Fort

Totte

nLA

LLIE

NO

RTH

FOR

TTO

TTE

N

KEY

1PO

PLA

R G

RO

VE

RO

LETT

E1

TUR

TLE

MO

UN

TAIN

RA

MSE

Y

BA

LTA

°

BIS

BEE

°

CH

UR

CH

SFE

RRY

°

CR

ARY

°

BR

OC

KET

°

CALIO°

CA

LVIN

°

CA

ND

O°

ALS

EN°

AN

ETA

°

DU

NSE

ITH

°

EDM

OR

E°

EGEL

AN

D°

ESM

ON

D°

LAW

TON

°

LEED

S°

LOM

A°

HA

MPD

EN°

HA

NN

AH

°H

AN

S-B

OR

O°

KN

OX

°

LAK

OTA

°

LAN

GD

ON

°

McV

ILLE

°

MA

DD

OC

K°

NEK

OM

A°

MIC

HIG

AN

CIT

Y°M

ILTO

N°

MU

NIC

H°

MY

LO°

STA

RK

-W

EATH

ER°

OB

ER-

ON

°

OSN

A-

BR

OC

K°

PEK

IN°

PERT

H°

PETE

RSB

UR

G°

RO

CK

-LA

KE°

RO

LETT

E°

RO

LLA

°

RU

GB

Y°

ST. J

OH

N°

SAR

LES°

TOLN

A°

WA

LES°

WA

RWIC

K°

WO

LFO

RD

°

YO

RK

°

Gre

enA

cres

Orr

in

Selz

Shel

lVa

lley

Bar

ton

Bel

cour

t

Dah

len

East

Dun

seith

SPIR

IT L

AK

E* (p

t)

1

TUR

TLE

MO

UN

TAIN

(pts

)

ALB

ER

T

AR

NE

AU

RO

RA

BE

AVE

R

BR

OE

BU

TTE

VALL

EY

EA

ST

FOR

K

ELD

ON

ES

MO

ND

HE

SP

ER

IMPA

RK

IOW

A

IRV

INE

ISA

BE

L

KN

OX

LAK

EIB

SE

N

LALL

IE

LEE

DS

LOH

NE

S

McC

LEL-

LAN

MIN

CO

MIS

SIO

N

NO

RM

-A

NIA

NO

RTH

VIK

ING

OB

ER

ON

PLE

AS

AN

TLA

KE RIC

HVA

LLE

Y

RIG

GIN

RO

CK

SO

UTH

VIK

ING

TWIN

LAK

E

TWIN

TRE

EW

AR

WIC

KW

ES

TA

NTE

LOP

EWE

ST

BAY

WO

OD

LAK

E

YO

RK

ALM

A

BA

NN

ER

BIL

LIN

GS

BR

UC

E

BY

RO

NC

YP

RE

SS

DR

ES

DE

N

EA

SB

YE

AS

TA

LMA

ELG

IN

FRE

MO

NT

GLE

NIL

A

GO

RD

ON

GR

EY

HA

RV

EY

HAY

HE

ND

ER

-S

ON

HO

PE

HU

RO

N

LAN

GD

ON

LIN

DE

N

LOA

M

MA

NIL

LA

MIN

TO

MO

NT-

RO

SE

MO

SCO

W

MO

UN

TC

AR

ME

L

NE

KO

MA

NO

RTH

LOM

A

NO

RTH

OLG

A

OS

FOR

DO

SN

A-

BR

OC

K

PE

RR

Y

SE

IVE

RT

SO

UTH

DR

ES

DE

N

SO

UTH

OLG

A

STO

RLI

E

TRIE

R

WAT

ER

LOO

WE

ST

HO

PE

LEE

LEVA

LM

ELV

IN

MIC

HIG

AN

NA

SH

NE

SH

EIM

OR

A

OS

AG

O

PE

TER

SB

UR

G

RU

BIN

RU

GH

SA

RN

IA

WA

M-

DU

SK

A

WIL

LIA

MS

ALE

X-

AN

TER

AN

TELO

PE

LAK

E

BA

LTA

CE

NTR

AL

PIE

RC

E

ELL

ING

ELV

ER

UM

HA

GE

L

JEFF

-E

RS

ON

ME

YE

RN

ES

S

NO

RTH

PIE

RC

E

RE

NO

VALL

EY

RU

SH

LAK

E

SO

UTH

PIE

RC

E

TOR

GE

R-

SO

N

TRU

MA

N

TUS

CA

-R

OR

A

WH

ITE

BA

RTL

ETT

CAT

OC

HA

INLA

KE

S

CO

ULE

E

CR

EE

L

DE

GR

OAT

DR

YLA

KE

FAN

CH

ER

FRE

SH

-W

ATE

R

GR

AN

DH

AR

BO

RHA

MM

ER

HA

RD

ING

HIG

HLA

ND

CE

NTE

R

HO

PE

KLI

NG

-S

TRU

P

LAW

TON

LILL

E-

HO

FF

MIN

NE

-W

AU

KA

N

MO

RR

IS

AD

LER

BE

RG

EN

CE

NTR

AL

NE

WB

RE

NE

W-

LAN

D

NO

ON

AN

NO

RTH

CR

EE

L

NO

RTH

-FI

ELD O

DE

SS

A

ON

TAR

IO

EA

ST

RO

LETT

EK

OH

L-M

EIE

R

MA

RY-

VIL

LE

NO

RTH

RO

LETT

E

SH

ELL

VALL

EY

CLA

RA

DA

HLE

N

DAY

TON

DO

DD

S

EN

TER

-P

RIS

E

FIE

LD

OV

ER

LAN

D

PE

LIC

AN

1

PR

OS

PE

CT

RO

YAL

STE

VE

NS

SO

UTH

RO

LETT

ES

OU

THVA

LLE

Y

TUR

TLE

MO

UN

TAIN

FOR

DE

HA

MLI

N

ILLI

NO

IS

LAK

OTA

SU

LLIV

AN

TRIU

MP

HW

EBS

TER

AR

MO

UR

-D

ALE AT

KIN

S

BE

THE

LC

AN

DO

CO

OLI

N

CR

OC

USD

AS

H

GE

RR

AR

D

GR

AIN

-FI

ELD

HO

WE

LL

LAN

SIN

G

MA

ZA

MO

NR

OE

MO

UN

TV

IEW N

EW

CIT

Y

OLS

ON

PAU

LSO

N

PIC

TON

RO

CK

LAK

E

SID

NE

YS

MIT

H

SO

RE

N-

SO

N

SP

RIN

G-

FIE

LD

TED

DY

TWIN

HIL

L

VIC

TOR

VIR

GIN

IA

ZIO

N

SEE

SEC

TIO

N 2

SEE

SEC

TIO

N 5

SEE

SEC

TIO

N 6

SEE

SEC

TIO

N 7

Devils

Lake


98°

98°

98°3

0’

98°3

0’

99°

99°

99°3

0’

99°3

0’

100°

100°

49°

49°

48°30’

48°30’

48°

48°

04

812

Kilo

met

ers

04

812

Mile

s BILLINGS

DUNN

GOLDENVALLEY

McKENZIE

STARK

YELLOWSTONE

BEACH°BELFIELD°

ALEX-ANDER° ARNE-

GARD°

GOLVA°

HALLIDAY°

DICKINSON°

DODGE°

DUNNCENTER°

GLADSTONE°

KILLDEER°

MEDORA°

SOUTHHEART° RICHARDTON°

SENTINELBUTTE°

TAYLOR°

WATFORD CITY°

EastFair-view

FourBearsVillage

Mand-aree

Manning

FORT BERTHOLD* (pt)

NORTH BILLINGS

SOUTH BILLINGSEAST

GOLDENVALLEY

ELKCREEK

ELM-WOOD

GARNER

HENRY

LONETREE

NORTHGOLDENVALLEY

PEARL

SADDLEBUTTE

SENTINEL

SOUTHGOLDENVALLEY

FORT BERTHOLD

HALLIDAYKILLDEER

SOUTH DUNN

BEACH

BULLION

DELHI

DICKINSON NORTH

DICKINSON SOUTH

EAST STARKWEST STARK

ALEX

ANTELOPECREEK

ARNEGARD

BLUEBUTTE

CENTRAL McKENZIE

CHARBON EASTMcKEN-

ZIE

ELMTREE

FORTBERTHOLD

GRAIL

HAWKEYEKEENE

NORTH McKENZIE

RANDOLPH

RIVERVIEW

SIOUX

SOUTHEAST McKENZIE

SOUTHWEST McKENZIE

TRI

TWINVALLEY

SEESECTION 1

SEESECTION 5

SEESECTION 8

SEESEC

TION

9

Lake Sakakawea

102°30’

102°30’

103°

103°

103°30’

103°30’

104°

104°

102°

48°

48°

47°3

0’

47°3

0’

47°

47°

46°3

0’

46°3

0’


0 4 8 12 Kilometers

0 4 8 12 Miles


BILLINGS

DUNN

GOLDENVALLEY

McKENZIE

STARK

YELLOWSTONE

BEACH°BELFIELD°

ALEX-ANDER° ARNE-

GARD°

GOLVA°

HALLIDAY°

DICKINSON°

DODGE°

DUNNCENTER°

GLADSTONE°

KILLDEER°

MEDORA°

SOUTHHEART° RICHARDTON°

SENTINELBUTTE°

TAYLOR°

WATFORD CITY°

EastFair-view

FourBearsVillage

Mand-aree

Manning

FORT BERTHOLD* (pt)

NORTH BILLINGS

SOUTH BILLINGSEAST

GOLDENVALLEY

ELKCREEK

ELM-WOOD

GARNER

HENRY

LONETREE

NORTHGOLDENVALLEY

PEARL

SADDLEBUTTE

SENTINEL

SOUTHGOLDENVALLEY

FORT BERTHOLD

HALLIDAYKILLDEER

SOUTH DUNN

BEACH

BULLION

DELHI

DICKINSON NORTH

DICKINSON SOUTH

EAST STARKWEST STARK

ALEX

ANTELOPECREEK

ARNEGARD

BLUEBUTTE

CENTRAL McKENZIE

CHARBON EASTMcKEN-

ZIE

ELMTREE

FORTBERTHOLD

GRAIL

HAWKEYEKEENE

NORTH McKENZIE

RANDOLPH

RIVERVIEW

SIOUX

SOUTHEAST McKENZIE

SOUTHWEST McKENZIE

TRI

TWINVALLEY

SEESECTION 1

SEESECTION 5

SEESECTION 8

SEESEC

TION

9

Lake Sakakawea

102°30’

102°30’

103°

103°

103°30’

103°30’

104°

104°

102°

48°

48°

47°3

0’

47°3

0’

47°

47°

46°3

0’

46°3

0’


0 4 8 12 Kilometers

0 4 8 12 Miles


BURLEIGH

McLEAN

MERCER

OLIVER

SHERIDAN

CO

LE-

HA

RB

OR

°

HO

RSE

-SH

OE

VALL

EY

LIN

CO

LN-

FOR

T R

ICE

BIS

-M

AR

CK

°

BEN

E-D

ICT°

BEU

LAH

°

CEN

TER

°

BU

TTE°

GO

LDEN

VALL

EY°

GO

OD

-R

ICH

°

GA

RR

-IS

ON

°

LIN

CO

LN°

HA

ZEN

°

McC

LUSK

Y°

MA

RTIN

°M

AX

°

MER

CER

°

STA

NTO

N°

PIC

K C

ITY

°

REG

AN

°

RIV

ER-

DA

LE°

RU

SO°

TURT

LELA

KE°

UN

DER

-W

OO

D°

WA

SHB

UR

N° WIL

TON

°

WIN

G°

ZAP°

Men

oken

Whi

teSh

ield

Den

hoff

Dris

coll

FORT

BERTHOLD*

(pt)

TUR

TLE

MO

UN

TAIN

(pts

)

AP

PLE

CR

EE

KB

OY

D

BU

RN

T C

RE

EK

-R

IVE

RV

IEW

CA

NFI

ELD

CH

RIS

-TI

AN

IAC

LEA

RLA

KE

CR

OFT

EC

RO

M-

WE

LL

DR

ISC

OLL

EC

KLU

ND

ES

THE

R-

VIL

LE

FLO

RE

NC

ELA

KE

FRA

NC

IS

GH

YLI

N

GIB

BS

GLE

NV

IEW

GR

AS

SLA

KE

HA

RR

IET-

LIEN

HAY

CR

EE

K

HA

ZEL

GR

OV

E

LOG

AN

LON

GLA

KE

LYM

AN

McK

EN

ZIE

ME

NO

KE

N

MIS

SO

UR

IM

OR

TON

NA

UG

HTO

N

PAIN

TED

WO

OD

S

PH

OE

NIX

RIC

HM

ON

D

RO

CK

HIL

L

SC

HR

UN

K

SIB

LEY

BU

TTE

STE

IBE

R

STE

RLI

NG

TAFT

TELF

ER

THE

LMA

TRY

GG

WIL

DR

OS

E

WIL

SO

N

WIN

G

AM

UN

DS

-V

ILLE

AND

RE

WS

AU

RE

NA

BLA

CK

-W

ATE

R

BLU

EH

ILL

BU

TTE

BY

ER

S-

VIL

LE

CR

EM

ER

-V

ILLE

DE

EP

-W

ATE

R

DO

GD

EN

DO

UG

LAS

EA

ST

McL

EA

N

FOR

TB

ER

THO

LD

GAT

E

GR

EAT

-S

TON

E

LAK

EW

ILLI

AM

S

LON

G-

FELL

OW

EA

ST

OLI

VE

R

WE

ST

OLI

VE

R

BE

RLI

NLO

QU

E-

MO

NT

McG

INN

IS

MA

LCO

LMM

ED

ICIN

EH

ILL

ME

RC

ER

NO

RTH

CE

NTR

AL

McL

EA

N

OTI

S

RO

SE

-G

LEN

BO

ON

E

DE

NH

OFF

ED

GE

-M

ON

T

FAIR

VIE

W

RO

SE

-M

ON

T

ST.

MA

RY

SN

OW

SO

UTH

McL

EA

N

TUR

TLE

LAK

E

UN

DE

RW

OO

D

VIC

TOR

IA

WE

ST

McL

EA

N

WIS

E

EA

ST

ME

RC

ER

FOR

T B

ER

THO

LD

WE

ST

ME

RC

ER

GO

OD

-R

ICH

HIG

H-

LAN

D

LIN

CO

LND

ALE

McC

LUS

KY

MA

RTI

N

MA

UC

H

NO

RTH

SH

ER

IDA

N

PIC

KA

RD

PR

O-

PH

ETS

RO

SE

N-

FIE

LD

SO

UTH

SH

ER

IDA

N

STR

AS

S-

BU

RG

SEE

SEC

TIO

N 1

SEE

SEC

TIO

N 2

SEE

SEC

TIO

N 3

SEE

SEC

TIO

N 4

SEE

SEC

TIO

N 6

SEE

SEC

TIO

N 9

Lake

Sakakawea


100°

100°

100°

30’

100°

30’

101°10

1°

101°

30’

101°

30’

102°

102°

102°

30’10

2°30

’

47°30’

47°30’

47°

47°

04

812

Kilo

met

ers

04

812

Mile

s

BA

RN

ES

EDD

Y

FOST

ER

GR

IGG

S

KID

DER

STEE

LE

STU

TSM

AN

WEL

LS SO

UTH

CO

TTO

N-

WO

OD

LAK

EW

AS

HIN

G-

TON

NEW

RO

CK

-FO

RD

°

CA

RR

ING

-TO

NC

AR

R-

ING

TON

°

GLE

N-

FIEL

D°

CLE

AR

-FI

ELD

CO

OP

ER

S-

TOW

N

CO

OPE

RS-

TOW

N°

HA

NN

A-

FOR

D°

WIM

BLE

-D

ON

°

PILL

S-B

URY

°

VALL

EYC

ITY

°

TOW

ERC

ITY

°(p

t)

BIN

G-

HA

MP

TON

LITC

H-

VIL

LE°

THO

RD

EN

-S

KJO

LD

NO

RTH

-W

ES

TS

TUTS

-M

AN

CO

UR

T-EN

AY

CO

URT

-EN

AY°

WO

OD

-W

ORT

H°

SPIR

IT-

WO

OD

LAK

E°

JAM

ES-

TOW

N°

MO

NT-

PELI

ER°

MO

NT-

PE

LIE

R

PETT

I-B

ON

E°

BIN

FOR

D°

CLE

VE-

LAN

D°

DAW

SON

°

DA

ZEY

°

BO

WD

ON

°

BU

CH

-A

NA

N°

CAT

HAY

°G

RA

CE

CIT

Y°

FESS

EN-

DEN

°

FIN

GA

L°

FIN

LEY

°

LEA

L°

HA

MB

ERG

°H

ARV

EY°

HO

PE°

HU

RD

S-FI

ELD

°

KAT

HRY

N°

KEN

SAL°

LUV

ERN

E°

McH

ENRY

°

MED

INA

°

NO

ME°

SHEY

ENN

E°

SIB

LEY

°

STEE

LE°

STR

EETE

R°

SYK

ESTO

N°

OR

ISK

A°

PIN

GR

EE°

RO

BIN

SON

°R

OG

ERS°

SAN

BO

RN

°

SHA

RO

N°

TAPP

EN°

TUTT

LE°

Hei

mda

l

Jess

ie

Spiri

twoo

d

Sutto

n

Ypsi

lant

i

SPIR

IT L

AK

E* (p

t)

ALT

A

AN

DE

RS

ON

ASHTABULA

BA

LDW

IN

BR

IME

R

CU

BA

DA

ZEY

EC

KE

LSO

NED

NA

ELL

SB

UR

Y

GE

TCH

ELL

GR

AN

DP

RA

IRIE

GR

EE

N

GR

EE

N-

LAN

D

HE

ME

N

HO

BA

RT

LAK

ETO

WN

MA

NS

-FI

ELD

MA

RS

H

ME

AD

OW

LAKE

MIN

NIE

LAK

E

NE

LSO

NNO

LTIM

IER

NO

RM

A

OA

KH

ILL

OR

ISK

A

PIE

RC

E

PO

TTE

R

RA

RIT

AN

RO

GE

RS

RO

SE

BU

D

SIB

LEY

TRA

IL

SK

AN

DIA

SP

RIN

GC

RE

EK

SP

RIN

G-

VALE

STE

WA

RT

SV

EA

UX

BR

IDG

E

VALL

EY

WE

IME

R

ALL

EN

ATW

OO

D

BA

KE

R

BU

CK

EY

E

BU

NK

ER

CH

ES

TIN

A

CLE

AR

LAK

E

CR

OW

NH

ILL

CR

YS

TAL

SP

RIN

GS

EX

CE

L-S

IOR

FRE

TTIM

GR

AF

HAY

NE

S

KIC

KA

PO

O

LAK

EW

ILLI

AM

S

MA

NN

INGM

ER

KE

L

NO

RTH

-W

ES

T

PE

AC

EPE

TER

S-

VIL

LE

PE

TTI-

BO

NE

PLE

AS

AN

TH

ILL

QU

INB

Y

RE

XIN

E

RO

BIN

SO

N

SIB

LEY

BU

SH

CH

ER

RY

LAK

EC

OLU

MB

IA

CO

LVIN

ED

DY

SO

UTH

KID

DE

R

STE

WA

RT

TAN

NE

R

TAP

PE

N

FRE

E-

BO

RN

GAT

ES

GR

AN

D-

FIE

LD

HIL

LS-

DA

LE

TUTT

LE

VALL

EY

VE

RN

ONW

ALL

AC

E

WE

ISE

R

MU

NS

TER

NE

WR

OC

KFO

RD

PAR

AD

ISE

PLE

AS

AN

TP

RA

IRIE

AD

DIE

BA

LL H

ILL

BA

RTL

EY

BR

OA

D-

VIE

W

BR

YAN

WE

ST-

FOR

DW

ILLI

AM

S

WO

OD

-LA

WN

RO

SE

-FI

ELD

SH

ELD

ON

SU

PE

RIO

R

TIFF

AN

Y

DO

VE

RG

RE

EN

-FI

ELD

BIR

TSE

LL

BO

RD

ULA

CB

UC

E-

PH

ALI

AH

ELE

NA

KIN

GS

LEY

LEN

OR

A

MA

BE

L

PIL

OT

MO

UN

D

EA

STM

AN

ESTABROOK

FLO

RA

NC

E

GLE

NFI

ELD

HAV

EN

LAR

RA

BE

E

LON

G-

VIE

W

RO

MN

ES

S

RO

SE

ND

AL

SV

ER

DR

UP

TYR

OL

WA

SH

-B

UR

N

McH

EN

RY

McK

INN

ON

ME

LVIL

LE

NO

RD

-M

OR

E

WIL

LOW

RO

LLIN

GP

RA

IRIE

RO

SE

HIL

L

WYA

RD

BE

AVE

RC

RE

EK

BROADLAW

NC

AR

PE

N-

TER

CO

LGAT

E

EA

STO

N

ED

EN

DA

LE

EN

GE

R

CU

SAT

OR

DE

ER

LAK

E

DU

RH

AM

ED

MU

ND

S

ELD

RID

GE

FLIN

T

FRIE

D

GE

RB

ER

GE

RM

AN

IAGLA

CIE

R

GR

AY

GR

IFFI

N

HID

DE

N

HO

ME

R

BE

RLI

N

BIL

OD

EA

U

BR

EM

EN

BU

LLM

OO

SE

CAT

HAY

IOS

CO

JIM

RIV

ER

VALL

EY

KE

NS

AL

LEN

TON

LIP

PE

RT

CH

AS

ELE

Y

CR

YS

TAL

LAK

ED

ELG

ER

FAIR

VIL

LE

FOR

WAR

D

LOW

ER

Y

LYO

N

MA

NN

S

MA

RS

TON

-M

OO

R

MID

WAY

FRA

M

GE

RM

AN

-TO

WN

HA

ALA

ND

HA

MB

UR

G

MO

ON

LAK

E

NE

WB

UR

Y

NO

GO

SE

K

PAR

IS

PE

TER

-S

ON

PIN

GR

EE

HAW

KS

-N

ES

T

HE

IMD

AL

HIL

LS-

DA

LE

JOH

NS

ON

LYN

N

MA

NFR

ED

PIP

ES

TEM

VALL

EY

PLA

IN-

VIE

W

RO

SE

RO

UN

DTO

P

NO

RW

AYLA

KE

OS

HK

OS

HP

ON

YG

ULC

H

PR

OG

RE

SS

RU

SLA

ND

ST.

PA

UL

SE

VE

RN

SH

AR

LOW

SIN

CLA

IR

SP

IRIT

-W

OO

D

STI

RTO

N

STR

EE

TER

ST.

AN

NA

SIL

VE

RLA

KE

SP

EE

D-

WE

LLS

YK

ES

TONVA

LHA

LLA

WE

LLS

STR

ON

G

SY

DN

EY

VALL

EY

SP

RIN

G

WA

DS

-W

OR

TH

WA

LTE

RS

WE

STE

RN

WE

ST

NO

RW

AY

WE

ST

ON

TAR

IO

WO

OD

-W

AR

D

WE

LDW

IND

SO

R

WIN

FIE

LDW

OO

D-

BU

RY

YP

SIL

AN

TI

FIN

LEY

FRA

NK

LIN

GO

LDE

NLA

KE

GR

EE

N-

VIE

W

HU

GO

ME

LRO

SE

NE

W-

BU

RG

H

PR

IMR

OS

E

RIV

ER

-S

IDE

SH

AR

ON

SH

ER

-B

RO

OK

E

WE

ST-

FIE

LD

WIL

LOW

LAK

E

ALEXANDER

AS

HLA

ND

BLO

OM

BLO

OM

EN

-FI

ELD

BU

CH

AN

AN

CH

AS

ELA

KE

CH

ICA

GO

CO

NK

LIN

CO

RIN

NE

CO

RW

IN

SEE

SEC

TIO

N 3

SEE

SEC

TIO

N5

SEE

SEC

TIO

N 7

SEE

SEC

TIO

N 9

SEE

SEC

TIO

N 1

0

SEE

SEC

TIO

N 1

1


100°

100°

97°3

0’

97°3

0’

98°

98°

98°3

0’

98°3

0’

99°

99°

99°3

0’

99°3

0’

47°30’

47°30’

47°

47° 46°30’

04

812

Kilo

met

ers

04

812

Mile

s


BA

RN

ES

EDD

Y

FOST

ER

GR

IGG

S

KID

DER

STEE

LE

STU

TSM

AN

WEL

LS SO

UTH

CO

TTO

N-

WO

OD

LAK

EW

AS

HIN

G-

TON

NEW

RO

CK

-FO

RD

°

CA

RR

ING

-TO

NC

AR

R-

ING

TON

°

GLE

N-

FIEL

D°

CLE

AR

-FI

ELD

CO

OP

ER

S-

TOW

N

CO

OPE

RS-

TOW

N°

HA

NN

A-

FOR

D°

WIM

BLE

-D

ON

°

PILL

S-B

URY

°

VALL

EYC

ITY

°

TOW

ERC

ITY

°(p

t)

BIN

G-

HA

MP

TON

LITC

H-

VIL

LE°

THO

RD

EN

-S

KJO

LD

NO

RTH

-W

ES

TS

TUTS

-M

AN

CO

UR

T-EN

AY

CO

URT

-EN

AY°

WO

OD

-W

ORT

H°

SPIR

IT-

WO

OD

LAK

E°

JAM

ES-

TOW

N°

MO

NT-

PELI

ER°

MO

NT-

PE

LIE

R

PETT

I-B

ON

E°

BIN

FOR

D°

CLE

VE-

LAN

D°

DAW

SON

°

DA

ZEY

°

BO

WD

ON

°

BU

CH

-A

NA

N°

CAT

HAY

°G

RA

CE

CIT

Y°

FESS

EN-

DEN

°

FIN

GA

L°

FIN

LEY

°

LEA

L°

HA

MB

ERG

°H

ARV

EY°

HO

PE°

HU

RD

S-FI

ELD

°

KAT

HRY

N°

KEN

SAL°

LUV

ERN

E°

McH

ENRY

°

MED

INA

°

NO

ME°

SHEY

ENN

E°

SIB

LEY

°

STEE

LE°

STR

EETE

R°

SYK

ESTO

N°

OR

ISK

A°

PIN

GR

EE°

RO

BIN

SON

°R

OG

ERS°

SAN

BO

RN

°

SHA

RO

N°

TAPP

EN°

TUTT

LE°

Hei

mda

l

Jess

ie

Spiri

twoo

d

Sutto

n

Ypsi

lant

i

SPIR

IT L

AK

E* (p

t)

ALT

A

AN

DE

RS

ON

ASHTABULA

BA

LDW

IN

BR

IME

R

CU

BA

DA

ZEY

EC

KE

LSO

NED

NA

ELL

SB

UR

Y

GE

TCH

ELL

GR

AN

DP

RA

IRIE

GR

EE

N

GR

EE

N-

LAN

D

HE

ME

N

HO

BA

RT

LAK

ETO

WN

MA

NS

-FI

ELD

MA

RS

H

ME

AD

OW

LAKE

MIN

NIE

LAK

E

NE

LSO

NNO

LTIM

IER

NO

RM

A

OA

KH

ILL

OR

ISK

A

PIE

RC

E

PO

TTE

R

RA

RIT

AN

RO

GE

RS

RO

SE

BU

D

SIB

LEY

TRA

IL

SK

AN

DIA

SP

RIN

GC

RE

EK

SP

RIN

G-

VALE

STE

WA

RT

SV

EA

UX

BR

IDG

E

VALL

EY

WE

IME

R

ALL

EN

ATW

OO

D

BA

KE

R

BU

CK

EY

E

BU

NK

ER

CH

ES

TIN

A

CLE

AR

LAK

E

CR

OW

NH

ILL

CR

YS

TAL

SP

RIN

GS

EX

CE

L-S

IOR

FRE

TTIM

GR

AF

HAY

NE

S

KIC

KA

PO

O

LAK

EW

ILLI

AM

S

MA

NN

INGM

ER

KE

L

NO

RTH

-W

ES

T

PE

AC

EPE

TER

S-

VIL

LE

PE

TTI-

BO

NE

PLE

AS

AN

TH

ILL

QU

INB

Y

RE

XIN

E

RO

BIN

SO

N

SIB

LEY

BU

SH

CH

ER

RY

LAK

EC

OLU

MB

IA

CO

LVIN

ED

DY

SO

UTH

KID

DE

R

STE

WA

RT

TAN

NE

R

TAP

PE

N

FRE

E-

BO

RN

GAT

ES

GR

AN

D-

FIE

LD

HIL

LS-

DA

LE

TUTT

LE

VALL

EY

VE

RN

ONW

ALL

AC

E

WE

ISE

R

MU

NS

TER

NE

WR

OC

KFO

RD

PAR

AD

ISE

PLE

AS

AN

TP

RA

IRIE

AD

DIE

BA

LL H

ILL

BA

RTL

EY

BR

OA

D-

VIE

W

BR

YAN

WE

ST-

FOR

DW

ILLI

AM

S

WO

OD

-LA

WN

RO

SE

-FI

ELD

SH

ELD

ON

SU

PE

RIO

R

TIFF

AN

Y

DO

VE

RG

RE

EN

-FI

ELD

BIR

TSE

LL

BO

RD

ULA

CB

UC

E-

PH

ALI

AH

ELE

NA

KIN

GS

LEY

LEN

OR

A

MA

BE

L

PIL

OT

MO

UN

D

EA

STM

AN

ESTABROOK

FLO

RA

NC

E

GLE

NFI

ELD

HAV

EN

LAR

RA

BE

E

LON

G-

VIE

W

RO

MN

ES

S

RO

SE

ND

AL

SV

ER

DR

UP

TYR

OL

WA

SH

-B

UR

N

McH

EN

RY

McK

INN

ON

ME

LVIL

LE

NO

RD

-M

OR

E

WIL

LOW

RO

LLIN

GP

RA

IRIE

RO

SE

HIL

L

WYA

RD

BE

AVE

RC

RE

EK

BROADLAW

NC

AR

PE

N-

TER

CO

LGAT

E

EA

STO

N

ED

EN

DA

LE

EN

GE

R

CU

SAT

OR

DE

ER

LAK

E

DU

RH

AM

ED

MU

ND

S

ELD

RID

GE

FLIN

T

FRIE

D

GE

RB

ER

GE

RM

AN

IAGLA

CIE

R

GR

AY

GR

IFFI

N

HID

DE

N

HO

ME

R

BE

RLI

N

BIL

OD

EA

U

BR

EM

EN

BU

LLM

OO

SE

CAT

HAY

IOS

CO

JIM

RIV

ER

VALL

EY

KE

NS

AL

LEN

TON

LIP

PE

RT

CH

AS

ELE

Y

CR

YS

TAL

LAK

ED

ELG

ER

FAIR

VIL

LE

FOR

WAR

D

LOW

ER

Y

LYO

N

MA

NN

S

MA

RS

TON

-M

OO

R

MID

WAY

FRA

M

GE

RM

AN

-TO

WN

HA

ALA

ND

HA

MB

UR

G

MO

ON

LAK

E

NE

WB

UR

Y

NO

GO

SE

K

PAR

IS

PE

TER

-S

ON

PIN

GR

EE

HAW

KS

-N

ES

T

HE

IMD

AL

HIL

LS-

DA

LE

JOH

NS

ON

LYN

N

MA

NFR

ED

PIP

ES

TEM

VALL

EY

PLA

IN-

VIE

W

RO

SE

RO

UN

DTO

P

NO

RW

AYLA

KE

OS

HK

OS

HP

ON

YG

ULC

H

PR

OG

RE

SS

RU

SLA

ND

ST.

PA

UL

SE

VE

RN

SH

AR

LOW

SIN

CLA

IR

SP

IRIT

-W

OO

D

STI

RTO

N

STR

EE

TER

ST.

AN

NA

SIL

VE

RLA

KE

SP

EE

D-

WE

LLS

YK

ES

TONVA

LHA

LLA

WE

LLS

STR

ON

G

SY

DN

EY

VALL

EY

SP

RIN

G

WA

DS

-W

OR

TH

WA

LTE

RS

WE

STE

RN

WE

ST

NO

RW

AY

WE

ST

ON

TAR

IO

WO

OD

-W

AR

D

WE

LDW

IND

SO

R

WIN

FIE

LDW

OO

D-

BU

RY

YP

SIL

AN

TI

FIN

LEY

FRA

NK

LIN

GO

LDE

NLA

KE

GR

EE

N-

VIE

W

HU

GO

ME

LRO

SE

NE

W-

BU

RG

H

PR

IMR

OS

E

RIV

ER

-S

IDE

SH

AR

ON

SH

ER

-B

RO

OK

E

WE

ST-

FIE

LD

WIL

LOW

LAK

E

ALEXANDER

AS

HLA

ND

BLO

OM

BLO

OM

EN

-FI

ELD

BU

CH

AN

AN

CH

AS

ELA

KE

CH

ICA

GO

CO

NK

LIN

CO

RIN

NE

CO

RW

IN

SEE

SEC

TIO

N 3

SEE

SEC

TIO

N5

SEE

SEC

TIO

N 7

SEE

SEC

TIO

N 9

SEE

SEC

TIO

N 1

0

SEE

SEC

TIO

N 1

1


100°

100°

97°3

0’

97°3

0’

98°

98°

98°3

0’

98°3

0’

99°

99°

99°3

0’

99°3

0’

47°30’

47°30’

47°

47° 46°30’

04

812

Kilo

met

ers

04

812

Mile

s


GRAND FORKS

PEMBINA

TRAILL

WALSH

THING-VALLA

MOUN-TAIN°

FARMING-TON

PARKRIVER°

PISEK°

FORESTRIVER°

GrandForksAFB

FALCONER

LARI-MORE°

EMER-ADO°

GRANDFORKS°

GRANDFORKS

NORTH-WOOD°

BENTRU

BELMONT

BING-HAM

CALE-DONIA

HILLS-BORO°

BATHGATE°

CLIFFORD°

CONWAY°

CRYSTAL°

BUXTON°

CANTONCITY°

CAVALIER°

ADAMS°

ARDOCH°

GRAFTON°

GRANDIN°(pt)

DRAY-TON°

EDINBURG°

FAIRDALE°

FORD-VILLE°

GALES-BURG°

GILBY°

HAMILTON°

HATTON°

HOOPLE°

INKSTER°

LANKIN°

MANVEL°

MAYVILLE°

NECHE°

NIA-GARA°

MINTO°

PEMBINA°

PORT-LAND°

REYNOLDS°

ST.THOMAS°

THOMPSON°

WAL-HALLA°

Nash

Auburn

Blanchard

Caledonia

AGNES

ALLEN-DALE

AMERICUS

ARVILLA

AVON

BLOOMING

BRENNACHESTER

ELK-MOUNT

ELMGROVE

FAIRFIELD

FERRYGILBY

GRACE

HEGTON

INKSTER

JOHNS-TOWN

LAKE-VILLE

LARIMORE

LEVANT

LIND

LOGANCENTER

LORETTA

MEKINOCK

MICHIGAN

MORAINE

NIAGARA

NORTH-WOOD

OAK-VILLE

PLEASANTVIEW

PLY-MOUTH

RYE

STRA-BANE

TURTLERIVER

UNION

WALLE

WASHING-TON

WHEAT-FIELD

ADVANCE

AKRA

BATHGATE

BEAULIEU

CARLISLE

CAVALIER

CRYSTAL

DRAYTON

ELORA

FELSON

GARDAR

HAMILTON JOLIETTE

LAMOURE

LINCOLNLODEMA

MIDLAND

NECHE

PARK

PEMBINAST.

JOSEPH

ST.THOMAS

WALHALLA

BUXTON

ELDO-RADO

ELMRIVER

ERVIN

GALES-BURG

GARFIELD

GREEN-FIELD

HER-BERGHILLS-

BORO

KELSO

LINDAAS

MAYVILLE

MORGAN

NORMAN

NORWAYROSE-VILLE

STAVAN-GER

VIKING WOLD

ACTON

ADAMS

ARDOCHCLEVE-LAND

DEWEY

DUNDEE

EDEN

FERTILE

FORESTRIVER

GLEN-WOOD

GOLDENGRAFTON

HARRIS-TON

KENSING-TON

KINLOSS

LAMPTON

LATONA

MARTIN

MEDFORD

NORTON

OAK-WOOD

OPSPERTH

PRAIRIECENTRE

PULASKI

RUSHFORD

ST.ANDREWS

SAUTER

SHEP-HERD

SILVESTA TIBER

VERNON

VESTA

WALSHCENTRE

WALSH-VILLE

BLAN-CHARD

BLOOM-FIELD

BOHN-SACK

SEESECTION 3

SEESECTION 6

SEESECTION 11

American Indian Areas, Counties, County Subdivisions, and Places - Section 796°30’

97°

97°

97°30’

97°30’

98°

98°

98°30’

98°30’

49°

48°3

0’

48°3

0’

48°

48°

47°3

0’

47°3

0’

0 4 8 12 Kilometers

0 4 8 12 Miles


ADAMS

BOWMAN

HETTINGER

SLOPE

MA

R-

MA

RTH

°

GA

S-C

OY

NE°

BO

WM

AN

°

BU

CY

RU

S°

AM

IDO

N°

HAY

NES

°

HET

TIN

-G

ER°

NEW

ENG

LAN

D°

MO

TT°

REE

DER

°

REG

ENT°

RH

AM

E°

SCR

AN

-TO

N°

LIG

HTN

ING

CR

EE

K

MA

INE

OR

AN

GE

RE

ED

ER

SC

OTT

SO

UTH

FOR

K

TAY

LOR

BU

TTE

WE

ST

AD

AM

SW

OLF

BU

TTE

BE

ISIG

L

BU

CY

RU

S

CE

DA

R

CE

NTR

AL

AD

AM

SC

HA

ND

LER

CLE

RM

ON

T

DA

RLI

NG

SP

RIN

GS

DU

CK

CR

EE

K

EA

ST

AD

AM

S

GIL

STR

APH

ETT

ING

ER

HO

LDE

N

AD

ELA

IDE

AM

OR

BO

WM

AN

BO

YE

SE

N

BU

EN

AV

ISTA

FIS

CH

-B

EIN

GA

SC

OY

NE

GE

M

GO

LD-

FIE

LD

GR

AIN

-B

ELT

GR

AN

DR

IVE

RH

ALE

Y

HA

RT

LAD

DLA

NG

BE

RG

MA

RIO

N

MIN

NE

-H

AH

A

NE

BO

RH

AM

E

SC

RA

NTO

N

STA

RS

TILL

-W

ATE

R

SU

NN

YS

LOP

ETA

LBO

T

WE

ST

BO

WM

AN

WH

ITIN

G

CA

STL

ER

OC

K

CE

NTR

AL

HE

TTIN

GE

R

CH

ILTO

N

CLA

RK

FAR

INA

HAV

ELO

CK

HIG

HLA

ND

KE

NN

ED

Y

KE

RN

KU

NZE

MA

DIS

ON

ME

RR

ILL

MO

TT

NE

WE

NG

LAN

D

OD

ES

SA

RIF

LE

ST.

CR

OIX

SO

LON

STE

INE

R

STR

EH

-LO

WTE

PE

EB

UTT

E

WA

GE

N-

DO

RF

WA

LKE

RA

CM

E

AS

HB

YB

AE

R

BE

ER

Y

BLA

CK

BU

TTE

BR

ITTI

AN

CA

MP

BE

LL

CA

NN

ON

BA

LL

MO

UN

D

NO

RTH

EA

ST

SLO

PE

NO

RTH

WE

ST

SLO

PE

PE

AC

EFU

LVA

LLE

Y

RA

INY

BU

TTE

RIC

HLA

ND

CE

NTE

RS

AN

D C

RE

EK

SH

EE

TS

WE

ST

SLO

PE

BU

CK

LIN

CA

RR

OLL

CA

SH

CE

DA

RC

RE

EK

CE

NTR

AL

SLO

PE

CO

NN

OR

CR

AW-

FOR

D

WH

ITE

LAK

E

WO

OD

-B

ER

RY

DE

EP

CR

EE

K

HA

RP

ER

HU

GH

ES

HU

ME

MIN

ER

AL

SP

RIN

GS

MO

OR

D

SEE

SEC

TIO

N 4

SEE

SEC

TIO

N 9


102°

102°

102°

30’10

2°30

’

103°

103°

103°

30’

103°

30’

104°

104°

47°

46°30’

46°30’

46°

46°

04

812

Kilo

met

ers

04

812

Mile

s


EMM

ON

SG

RA

NT

MO

RTO

N SIO

UX

Lake

Oahe

BR

AD

DO

CK

°

CA

RSO

N°

ALM

ON

T°

GLE

N U

LLIN

°

HA

GU

E°

ELG

IN°

FLA

SHER

°

FORT

YATE

S°

LEIT

H°

LIN

TON

°

HA

ZELT

ON

°

HEB

RO

N°

MA

ND

AN

°

NEW

LEIP

ZIG

°

NEW

SA

LEM

°

SOLE

N°

STR

ASB

UR

G°

SELF

RID

GE°

Har

mon

Hei

l

Porc

upin

e

Ral

eigh

Can

non

Bal

l

STA

ND

ING

RO

CK

* (pt

)

EA

ST

GR

AN

T

ELM

FIS

HE

R

FRE

DA

HO

WE

LAR

K

LEIP

ZIG

MIN

NIE

PR

ETT

YR

OC

K

RA

LEIG

HR

OC

K

WE

ST

GR

AN

T

WIN

ON

A

CA

MP

BE

LL

NO

RTH

EM

MO

NS

SO

UTH

EM

MO

NS

SO

UTH

WE

ST

SIO

UX

CA

PTA

IN’S

LAN

DIN

G

EA

ST

MO

RTO

N

MA

ND

AN

WE

ST

MO

RTO

N

FOR

TYA

TES

ME

NZ

NO

RTH

SIO

UX

SEE

SEC

TIO

N 4

SEE

SEC

TIO

N 5

SEE

SEC

TIO

N 6

SEE

SEC

TIO

N 8

SEE

SEC

TIO

N 1

0


100°

100°

100°

30’

100°

30’

101°10

1°

101°

30’

101°

30’

102°

102°

47°

47°

46°30’

46°30’

46°

46°

04

812

Kilo

met

ers

04

812

Mile

s


DICKEY

LaMOURE

LOGAN

McINTOSH

ELLE

N-

DA

LE°

FULL

ER-

TON

°

ASH

LEY

°

BER

LIN

°

DIC

KEY

°

EDG

ELEY

°

FOR

BES

°

FRED

ON

IA°

GA

CK

LE°

LEH

R°

JUD

°

KU

LM°

LaM

OU

RE°

LUD

DEN

°

MA

RIO

N°

NA

POLE

ON

°

MO

NA

NG

O°

OA

KES

°

VEN

TUR

IA°

VER

ON

A°

WIS

HEK

°

ZEEL

AN

D°

SA

RAT

OG

AS

HE

RID

AN

SW

ED

EW

AN

O

WIL

LOW

-B

AN

K

EA

ST

LOG

AN

MA

PLE

NO

RTH

-W

ES

T

PO

RT

EM

MA

PO

RTE

RP

OTS

DA

M

FIN

NG

LEN

DA

LE

GU

T-S

CH

MID

T

HA

AG

RIV

ER

DA

LES

PR

ING

VALL

EY

VALL

EY

VAN

ME

TER

WH

ITE

-S

TON

E

JAN

KE

RE

DLA

KE

SE

ALY

WE

ST

LOG

AN

WR

IGH

T

YO

RK

-TO

WN

YO

UN

G

AD

RIA

N

BA

DG

ER

BLA

CK

LOA

MB

LUE

-B

IRD

DE

AN

GLA

D-

STO

NE

GLE

N

GLE

N-

MO

RE

GO

LDE

NG

LEN

GR

AN

DR

AP

IDS

GR

AN

D-

VIE

W

GR

EE

N-

VIL

LEH

EN

RI-

ETT

A

KE

NN

I-S

ON

LITC

H-

VIL

LEM

IKK

EL-

SO

N

NO

RA

AD

AA

LBE

RTH

A

ALB

ION

BE

AR

CR

EE

KC

LEM

EN

T

DIV

IDE

ELD

EN

NO

RD

EN

OV

ID

PE

AR

LLA

KE

PO

MO

NA

VIE

W

PR

AIR

IE

RA

NE

Y

ELL

EN

-D

ALE

ELM

GE

RM

AN

GR

AN

DVA

LLE

Y

RAY

RO

SC

OE

RU

SS

ELL

RYA

N

HA

M-

BU

RG

HU

DS

ON

JAM

ES

RIV

ER

VALL

EY

KE

NT

KE

NTN

ER

KE

Y-S

TON

E

LOR

RA

INE

LOV

ELL

EA

ST

McI

NTO

SH

NO

RTH

WE

ST

McI

NTO

SH

RO

LOFF

SO

UTH

WE

ST

McI

NTO

SH

SEE

SEC

TIO

N 6

SEE

SEC

TIO

N 9

SEE

SEC

TIO

N 1

1


98°

98°

98°3

0’

98°3

0’

99°

99°

99°3

0’

99°3

0’

100°

100°

47° 46°30’

46°30’

46°

46°

04

812

Kilo

met

ers

04

812

Mile

s


CASS

RANSOM

RICHLAND

SARGENT

ARGUS-VILLE°

HAR-WOOD

Wheatland CASSEL-TON° MAPLE-

TON°

DAVEN-PORT°

KINDRED°

WHITE-STONE

HILL

ROCHE-STER

AYR°

BARNEY°

CHRISTINE°

COGSWELL°

COLFAX°

BRIARWOOD°

BUFFALO°

CAYUGA°

ABERCROMBIE°

ALICE°

AMENIA°

ARTHUR°

GRANDIN°(pt)

GREATBEND°

GWINNER°

DWIGHT°

ELLIOTT°

ENDERLIN°

FAIRMOUNT°

FARGO°

FORMAN°

FORTRANSOM°

FRONTIER°

GARDNER°

LEONARD°

LIDGER-WOOD°

LISBON°

HANKIN-SON°

HARWOOD°

HAVANA°

HORACE°

HUNTER°

MANTA-DOR°

NORTH RIVER°

MILNOR°

MOORE-TON°

OXBOW°

PAGE°

PRAIRIE ROSE°

REILE’SACRES°

RUTLAND°

SHELDON°

TOWERCITY° (pt)

WAHPETON°

WALCOTT°

WEST FARGO°

WYND-MERE°

Embden

Englevale

Erie

McLeod

BrooktreePark

De Lamere

LAKE TRAVERSE* (pt)LAKE TRAVERSE (pt)

ADDISON

AMENIA

ARTHUR

AYR

BARNES

BELL

BERLIN

BUFFALO

CASSEL-TON

CLIFTON

CORNELL

DAVEN-PORT

DOWS

DURBIN

ELDRED

EMPIRE

ERIE

EVEREST

FARGO

GARDNER

GILL

GUNKEL

HARMONY

HIGHLAND

HILL HOWES

HUNTER

KINYON

LAKE

LEONARD

MAPLERIVER

MAPLETON

NOBLE

NORM-ANNA

PAGE

PLEASANTPONTIAC

RAYMOND REED

RICH

RUSHRIVER

STANLEY

TOWER

WALBURG WARREN

WATSON

WHEAT-LAND

WISER

FORMAN

HALL

HARLEM HERMAN

JACKSON

BIGBEND

CASEY

COBURN

ELLIOTT

KINGSTON

MARBOE

MILNOR

RANSOM

FORTRANSOM

GREENE

HANSONISLANDPARK

ISLEY

LIBERTY

RUTLAND

SARGENT

SHUMAN

SOUTH-WEST TAYLOR

TEWAUKON

MOORENORTH-LAND

OWEGO

PRESTON

ROSE-MEADE

SANDOUN

SCOVILLE

VERNER

VIVIAN

WEBER

WILLEY

SHEN-FORD

SPRINGER

SYDNA

TULLER

ABERCROMBIE

ANTELOPE

BARNEY

BARRIE

BELFORD BRANDEN-BURG

BRIGHT-WOOD

CENTER

COLFAX

DANTON

DEVILLO

DEXTER

DUERR

DWIGHT

EAGLE

ELMA

FAIRM

OU

NT

FREE-MAN

GARBORG

GRANT

GREEN-DALE

HELEN-DALE

HOME-STEAD IBSEN

LaMARS

LIBERTYGROVE

MOORE-TON

MORAN

NANSEN

SHEY-ENNE

SUMMIT

VIKING

WALCOTT

WALDO

WESTEND

WYND-MERE

BOWEN

BRAMP-TON

DENVER

DUNBAR

ALICETONALLEGHANY BALE

SEESECTION 6

SEESECTION 7

SEESECTION 10


96°30’

96°30’

97°

97°

97°30’

97°30’

98°

98°

47°

47°

46°3

0’

46°3

0’

46°

46°

0 4 8 12 Kilometers

0 4 8 12 Miles


Man

dar

ee

Pars

hal

l

Wh

ite

Shie

ld

Shel

l C

reek

Tw

in B

utt

es

Fou

r Bea

rs

American Indian Reservation, Tribal Subdivisions - Fort Berthold

02

46Kilometers

02

46Miles

Are

a Lo

cato

r Map

Map

Leg

en

d

Not

e: A

ll le

gal b

ound

arie

s an

d na

mes

are

as

of J

anua

ry 1

, 201

0. W

here

the

bou

ndar

ies

coin

cide

, the

map

sho

ws

the

boun

dary

sym

bol f

or t

he A

mer

ican

Ind

ian

rese

rvat

ion

and/

orof

f-re

serv

atio

n tr

ust

land

. Any

geo

grap

hic

entit

y na

me

may

incl

ude

’(pt)

’ if

som

e po

rtio

n of

the

entit

y ex

tend

s be

yond

the

lim

its o

f th

e m

ap a

rea

disp

laye

d on

the

pag

e, o

r if

mul

tiple

disc

ontig

uous

pie

ces

of t

he e

ntity

hav

e be

en d

iscr

etel

y la

bele

d on

the

pag

e. A

geo

grap

hic

entit

y na

me

may

incl

ude

’(pts

)’ if

man

y di

scon

tiguo

us p

iece

s ex

ists

for

tha

t en

tity

that

cann

ot b

e di

scre

tely

labe

led.

The

bou

ndar

ies

show

n on

thi

s m

ap a

re for

Cen

sus

Bure

aust

atis

tical

dat

a co

llect

ion

and

tabu

latio

n pu

rpos

es o

nly;

the

ir de

pict

ion

and

desi

gnat

ion

for

stat

istic

al p

urpo

ses

does

not

con

stitu

te a

det

erm

inat

ion

of ju

risdi

ctio

nal a

utho

rity

or r

ight

sof

ow

ners

hip

or e

ntitl

emen

t.

Tri

bal

Su

bd

ivis

ion

Amer

ican

Ind

ian

Rese

rvat

ion


Hei

pa

(pt)

American Indian Reservation and Off-Reservation Trust Land, Tribal Subdivisions -Lake Traverse (pt)

02

46Kilometers

02

46Miles

Are

a Lo

cato

r Map

Map

Leg

en

d

Tri

bal

Su

bd

ivis

ion

Amer

ican

Ind

ian

Rese

rvat

ion/

Off-

Rese

rvat

ion

Trus

t La

nd

Not

e: A

ll le

gal b

ound

arie

s an

d na

mes

are

as

of J

anua

ry 1

, 201

0. W

here

the

boun

darie

s co

inci

de, t

he m

ap s

how

s th

e bo

unda

ry s

ymbo

l for

the

Amer

ican

Ind

ian

rese

rvat

ion

and/

or o

ff-re

serv

atio

n tr

ust

land

. Any

geog

raph

ic e

ntity

nam

e m

ay in

clud

e ’(p

t)’ i

f so

me

port

ion

of t

he e

ntity

exte

nds

beyo

nd t

he li

mits

of

the

map

are

a di

spla

yed

on t

he p

age,

or

ifm

ultip

le d

isco

ntig

uous

pie

ces

of t

he e

ntity

hav

e be

en d

iscr

etel

y la

bele

don

the

pag

e. A

geo

grap

hic

entit

y na

me

may

incl

ude

’(pts

)’ if

man

y di

scon

tiguo

us p

iece

s ex

ists

for

tha

t en

tity

that

can

not

be d

iscr

etel

y la

bele

d.Th

e bo

unda

ries

show

n on

thi

s m

ap a

re for

Cen

sus

Bure

au s

tatis

tical

dat

aco

llect

ion

and

tabu

latio

n pu

rpos

es o

nly;

the

ir de

pict

ion

and

desi

gnat

ion

for

stat

istic

al p

urpo

ses

does

not

con

stitu

te a

det

erm

inat

ion

of ju

risdi

ctio

nal

auth

ority

or

right

s of

ow

ners

hip

or e

ntitl

emen

t.


Cro

w H

ill

(pt)

Fort

Tott

en(p

t)

St. M

ich

ael

(pt)

Wood

Lak

e

Cro

w H

ill

(pt)

St.

Mic

hae

l(p

t)

Fort

Tott

en(p

t)

American Indian Reservation, Tribal Subdivisions - Spirit Lake

01

23Kilometers

01

23Miles

Are

a Lo

cato

r Map

Map

Leg

en

d

Tri

bal

Su

bd

ivis

ion

Amer

ican

Ind

ian

Rese

rvat

ion

Not

e: A

ll le

gal b

ound

arie

s an

d na

mes

are

as

of J

anua

ry 1

, 201

0. W

here

the

boun

darie

s co

inci

de, t

he m

ap s

how

s th

e bo

unda

ry s

ymbo

l for

the

Amer

ican

Ind

ian

rese

rvat

ion

and/

or o

ff-re

serv

atio

n tr

ust

land

. Any

geog

raph

ic e

ntity

nam

e m

ay in

clud

e ’(p

t)’ i

f so

me

port

ion

of t

he e

ntity

exte

nds

beyo

nd t

he li

mits

of

the

map

are

a di

spla

yed

on t

he p

age,

or

ifm

ultip

le d

isco

ntig

uous

pie

ces

of t

he e

ntity

hav

e be

en d

iscr

etel

y la

bele

don

the

pag

e. A

geo

grap

hic

entit

y na

me

may

incl

ude

’(pts

)’ if

man

y di

scon

tiguo

us p

iece

s ex

ists

for

tha

t en

tity

that

can

not

be d

iscr

etel

y la

bele

d.Th

e bo

unda

ries

show

n on

thi

s m

ap a

re for

Cen

sus

Bure

au s

tatis

tical

dat

aco

llect

ion

and

tabu

latio

n pu

rpos

es o

nly;

the

ir de

pict

ion

and

desi

gnat

ion

for

stat

istic

al p

urpo

ses

does

not

con

stitu

te a

det

erm

inat

ion

of ju

risdi

ctio

nal

auth

ority

or

right

s of

ow

ners

hip

or e

ntitl

emen

t.


Porc

up

ine

Fort

Yat

es

Can

non

bal

l

Ken

el(p

t)

American Indian Reservation, Tribal Subdivisions - Standing Rock (pt)

03

69Kilometers

03

69Miles

Are

a Lo

cato

r Map

Map

Leg

en

d

Tri

bal

Su

bd

ivis

ion

Amer

ican

Ind

ian

Rese

rvat

ion

Not

e: A

ll le

gal b

ound

arie

s an

d na

mes

are

as

of J

anua

ry 1

, 201

0. W

here

the

boun

darie

s co

inci

de, t

he m

ap s

how

s th

e bo

unda

ry s

ymbo

l for

the

Amer

ican

Ind

ian

rese

rvat

ion

and/

or o

ff-re

serv

atio

n tr

ust

land

. Any

geog

raph

ic e

ntity

nam

e m

ay in

clud

e ’(p

t)’ i

f so

me

port

ion

of t

he e

ntity

exte

nds

beyo

nd t

he li

mits

of

the

map

are

a di

spla

yed

on t

he p

age,

or

ifm

ultip

le d

isco

ntig

uous

pie

ces

of t

he e

ntity

hav

e be

en d

iscr

etel

y la

bele

don

the

pag

e. A

geo

grap

hic

entit

y na

me

may

incl

ude

’(pts

)’ if

man

y di

scon

tiguo

us p

iece

s ex

ists

for

tha

t en

tity

that

can

not

be d

iscr

etel

y la

bele

d.Th

e bo

unda

ries

show

n on

thi

s m

ap a

re for

Cen

sus

Bure

au s

tatis

tical

dat

aco

llect

ion

and

tabu

latio

n pu

rpos

es o

nly;

the

ir de

pict

ion

and

desi

gnat

ion

for

stat

istic

al p

urpo

ses

does

not

con

stitu

te a

det

erm

inat

ion

of ju

risdi

ctio

nal

auth

ority

or

right

s of

ow

ners

hip

or e

ntitl

emen

t.

CANADA

POLK

(PAR

T)

CLAY WILK

IN

Bism

arck

Dick

inso

nFa

rgo

Gran

d Fo

rks

Jam

esto

wn

Min

ot

Wahp

eton

Will

iston

RANS

OM

RENV

ILLE

ROLE

TTE

SARG

ENT

SHER

IDAN

SLOP

E

STAR

K

STUT

SMAN

TOW

NER

ADAM

S

BARN

ES

BENS

ON

BILL

INGS

BOTT

INEA

U

BOW

MAN

CASS

EDDY

GRAN

D FO

RKS

GRAN

T

McI

NTOS

H

McK

ENZI

E

MOR

TON

PEM

BINA

RAM

SEY

RICH

LAND

SIOU

X

STEE

LETR

AILL

WAL

SHW

ILLIA

MS

BURK

E

BURL

EIGH

CAVA

LIER

DICK

EY

DIVI

DE

DUNN

EMM

ONS

FOST

ER

GOLD

ENVA

LLEY

GRIG

GS

HETT

INGE

R

KIDD

ER

LaM

OURE

LOGA

N

McH

ENRY

MER

CER

MOU

NTRA

IL

NELS

ON

OLIV

ER

PIER

CE

WAR

D

WEL

LSM

cLEA

N

MO

NTA

NA

MIN

NES

OTA

SOU

TH D

AKO

TA

Dick

inso

n

Jam

esto

wn

Min

ot

Wahp

eton

Will

iston

BISM

ARCK

FARG

OGRAN

DFO

RKS

(PAR

T)

Fargo-

Wahpeton

Core Based Statistical Areas, Counties, and Principal Cities

100°

100°

96°

96°

97°

97°

98°

98°

99°

99°

101°10

1°

102°

102°

103°

103°

104°

104°

49°

49°

48°

48°

47°

47°

46°

46°

45°

45°

020

4060

Kilometers

020

4060

Miles

LEG

EN

DFargo-Wahpeton

Com

bine

d S

tatis

tical

Are

a

Min

otM

icro

polit

an S

tatis

tical

Are

aBI

SMAR

CKM

etro

polit

an S

tatis

tical

Are

a

CB

SA

boun

darie

s an

d na

mes

are

as

of D

ecem

ber 2

009.

All

othe

r bou

ndar

ies

and

nam

es a

re a

s of

Jan

uary

1, 2

010.

MO

NTA

NA

Sta

teGR

AND

FORK

SC

ount

y

CANADA

Inte

rnat

iona

l

Bism

arck

Prin

cipa

l City

Sta

te c

apita

l und

erlin

ed

Cou

nty

outs

ide

Nor

th D

akot

a


CANADA

POLK

(PAR

T)

CLAY WILK

IN

Bism

arck

Dick

inso

nFa

rgo

Gran

d Fo

rks

Jam

esto

wn

Min

ot

Wahp

eton

Will

iston

RANS

OM

RENV

ILLE

ROLE

TTE

SARG

ENT

SHER

IDAN

SLOP

E

STAR

K

STUT

SMAN

TOW

NER

ADAM

S

BARN

ES

BENS

ON

BILL

INGS

BOTT

INEA

U

BOW

MAN

CASS

EDDY

GRAN

D FO

RKS

GRAN

T

McI

NTOS

H

McK

ENZI

E

MOR

TON

PEM

BINA

RAM

SEY

RICH

LAND

SIOU

X

STEE

LETR

AILL

WAL

SHW

ILLIA

MS

BURK

E

BURL

EIGH

CAVA

LIER

DICK

EY

DIVI

DE

DUNN

EMM

ONS

FOST

ER

GOLD

ENVA

LLEY

GRIG

GS

HETT

INGE

R

KIDD

ER

LaM

OURE

LOGA

N

McH

ENRY

MER

CER

MOU

NTRA

IL

NELS

ON

OLIV

ER

PIER

CE

WAR

D

WEL

LSM

cLEA

N

MO

NTA

NA

MIN

NES

OTA

SOU

TH D

AKO

TA

Dick

inso

n

Jam

esto

wn

Min

ot

Wahp

eton

Will

iston

BISM

ARCK

FARG

OGRAN

DFO

RKS

(PAR

T)

Fargo-

Wahpeton

Core Based Statistical Areas, Counties, and Principal Cities

100°

100°

96°

96°

97°

97°

98°

98°

99°

99°

101°10

1°

102°

102°

103°

103°

104°

104°

49°

49°

48°

48°

47°

47°

46°

46°

45°

45°

020

4060

Kilometers

020

4060

Miles

LEG

EN

DFargo-Wahpeton

Com

bine

d S

tatis

tical

Are

a

Min

otM

icro

polit

an S

tatis

tical

Are

aBI

SMAR

CKM

etro

polit

an S

tatis

tical

Are

a

CB

SA

boun

darie

s an

d na

mes

are

as

of D

ecem

ber 2

009.

All

othe

r bou

ndar

ies

and

nam

es a

re a

s of

Jan

uary

1, 2

010.

MO

NTA

NA

Sta

teGR

AND

FORK

SC

ount

y

CANADA

Inte

rnat

iona

l

Bism

arck

Prin

cipa

l City

Sta

te c

apita

l und

erlin

ed

Cou

nty

outs

ide

Nor

th D

akot

a


#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

Beul

ah

Devi

ls L

ake

Dick

inso

n

Gran

d Fo

rks

AFB

Linc

oln

Min

ot

Valle

y Ci

ty

Wah

peto

n, N

D--M

N

Rugb

y

Will

isto

n

Graf

ton

Jam

esto

wn

Min

ot A

FB

BISM

ARCK

FARG

O, N

D--M

N

GRAN

D FO

RKS,

ND-

-MN

MIN

NES

OTA

MONTANA

SOU

TH D

AK

OTA

CANADA

100°

100°

97°

97°

98°

98°

99°

99°

101°10

1°

102°

102°

103°

103°

104°

104°

49°

49°

48°

48°

47°

47°

46°

46°

45°

45°

Urban Areas

URBA

NIZ

ED A

REA

LEG

END

All

lega

l and

sta

tistic

al a

rea

boun

darie

s ar

e as

of J

anua

ry 1

, 201

0. U

rban

Are

as a

re b

ased

on

resu

lts fr

om th

e 20

10 D

ecen

nial

Cen

sus.

INTERNATIONAL

STAT

E

#Ur

ban

Clus

ter

Cou

nty

Bou

ndar

y±

09

1827

Mile

s

09

1827

Kilo

met

ers

population and housing unit counts - census.gov · 2012-06-26 · population and housing unit...

Documents