ponencia jagimenez greenport greencranes 16102014

8/20/2019 Ponencia Jagimenez Greenport Greencranes 16102014

1/43

GREENPORT CONGRESS

Barcelona, 16th October 2014


2/43

Green Technologies and Eco-efficient Alternatives for Cranes and Operations at Port Container Terminals Page 2

CONTENTS

1. Project Overview

2. Why GREENCRANES?

3. Project Activities

4. Beyond GREENCRANES


3/43


4/43


1. Project Overview

GREENCRANES is a pilot action involving three Member States: Spain, Italy and Slovenia, including

public administrations, strategic ports, port industrial partners and innovation centres.

Project Consortium External Companies


5/43


CONTENTS

1. Project Overview

2. Why GREENCRANES?




6/43


Why GREENCRANES?

Industry and transport sectors in Europe are evolving towards a low-

carbon emission operative model.

Technologies based on alternative fuels and advanced energy control

and management systems are mature and applied in other fields.

There is gap between the research developed in ports in the last

decade and the application of innovative solutions able to reduce GHG

and pollutant emissions.

There is also a lack of collaboration among ports which makes difficult

the effective exchange of knowledge.

2. Why GREENCRANES?


7/43


Specific Objectives:

§ Demonstrate financial, technical and environmental feasibilityfor the adoption of Eco-Efficient Alternatives at European Port

Container Terminals based on alternative fuels and smart energy

management

§ Test by means of real life pilots those Eco-Efficient Alternatives

with high potential of fast market adoption and deployment in realinstallations

General Objective:

Facilitate the transition of the port industry to a low-carbon

emission operative model

2. Why GREENCRANES?


8/43


CONTENTS

1. Project Overview

2. Why GREENCRANES?




9/43


Container Terminal Machinery and Equipment

Ship-to-Shore Crane Reefer Containers Offices

Rubber Tyred Gantry

Crane (RTG)

Terminal Tractor Reach Stacker Empty Forklift

Lightning

Activity 1. Mapping of Port Container Terminals Energy Profile

Consumer Centres at Port Container Terminals


10/43



How Much Energy? Electrical Consumption

11,006,280 kWh (37%)

4,801,013 kWh (15%)

12,522,629 kWh (43%)

1,815,477 kWh (5%)

80%

30,145,399 kWh (30.1 GWh)

Carbon Footprint (Electricity): 4.15 Kg CO2eq / TEU


11/43



How Much Energy? Fuel Consumption

4,049,138 L (58%)

2,245,147 L (32%)

611,460 L (9%)

80,819 L (1%)

6,986,564 L

90%

Carbon Footprint (Fuel): 7.57 Kg CO2eq / TEU


12/43



Where is the energy consumed?


13/43


Activity 2. Evaluation of Eco-Efficient GREENCRANES Alternatives

Activity 2 developed an integral evaluation with the aim of adapting existing solutions based

on innovative low-carbon emission technologies and alternative fuels for PCTs equipment

and handling machinery. The adoption of these technologies would significantly reduce the

global carbon footprint of port container installations.

§

LNG Implementation in Terminal Tractors

§ Eco-Fuels Reach Stacker Retrofitting

§ Rubber-Tyred Gantry (RTG) cranes Retrofitting

§ Application of fly-wheel technologies to RTGs

§ Implementation of Energy Management Systems

Financial, Technical and Environmental Evaluation


14/43


Activity 2. Evaluation of Eco-Efficient GREENCRANES Alternatives


15/43


Activity 3. Pilots and Demonstrations

Eco-RTG Gen-Set Downsizing LNG Terminal Tractor

Dual-Fuel Reach Stacker Energy Monitoring System


16/43



ECO-RTG GEN-SET DOWNSIZING


17/43



ECO-RTG Gen-Set Downsizing


18/43


0

5

10

15

20

25

30

Current Situation Pilot I Pilot II

Old Generation RTG Consumption (l/h)

45 % Decrease

Fuel Cost €

Emissions


ECO-RTG Gen-Set Downsizing


19/43



LNG TERMINAL TRACTOR PROTOTYPE


20/43



21/43



LNG Terminal Tractor Prototype

Design Manufacturing On-Site Deployment


22/43


LNG Terminal Tractor Prototype Design Requirements

3.500 mm wheelbase

Instead 3.300 mm standardHydraulic tank, battery and air

compressor moved to the

same side

This side free to install the

323 liters LNG tank



23/43



LNG Supply Mobile Station


24/43


Public Demonstration Day Valencia - December 2013



25/43


5.203

4.371

DIESEL LNG

TERMINAL TRACTORS FLEET 2012 (67 UNITS).

CO2 REDUCTION (TONNES)

Emissions Measurements


16 % Decrease

Fuel Cost €

Emissions


26/43


Emissions Measurements


Particulate(g/h)

NOx(g/h)

1st G VOLVO 720 TAD (Stage II) 9.6 481

2nd G VOLVO 750 TAD (Stage IIIA) 8.8 2923rd G CUMMMINS QSB 6.7 (Stage IIIA) 11.6 229

4th G CUMMMINS ISB6.7E5-225 (Stage IIIB) 1,0 33

Gas 2nd CUMMINS ISL9 G 250 (Stage IV) 0,0 39


27/43


Average Consumption Results


Fuel

(l/h; kg/h)

Energy

(kwh/h)

Autonomy

(h)

1st G VOLVO 720 TAD (Stage II) 8.2 88 18-20

2nd G VOLVO 750 TAD (Stage IIIA) 7.5 81 20-223rd G CUMMMINS QSB 6.7 (Stage IIIA) 6.3 68 +24

4th G CUMMMINS ISB6.7E5-225 (Stage IIIB) 5.7 61 +24

Gas 2nd CUMMINSISL9 G 250 (Stage IV) 6.9 101 17-18


28/43


Business Case LNG vs. Road Diesel at Europe

Fleet:

65

IRR:

12%

Fleet:

6

IRR:

63%

Fleet:51

IRR:

14%

Fleet:

20

IRR:

25%

Fleet:

14

IRR:28%

Fleet:

20IRR:

24%

Fleet:

12

IRR:

35%


29/43

Quick Deployment of GREENCRANES Products in the Port Sector


30/43



LNG DUAL-FUEL REACH STACKER


31/43



Diesel Consump tion

0,0

10,0

20,0

30,0

40,0

50,0

60,0

70,0

80,0

800 1000 1100 1200 1400 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000

Giri [rpm/min]

C o n s u m o G a s o l i o [ l t / h ]

The dual fuel powered engine does not show any decrease of power

compared to diesel, even at maximum load

Diesel substitution rate varies from 60% at low rpm to 35% at high rpm (at

maximum load)

Oil temperature, exhaust temperature and intake manifold pressure don’t

show significant differences between the dual fuel powered engine and the

diesel powered engine

Results of Bench Tests


32/43


Fuel Average Consumption Diesel Dual Fuel

Average subst itution rate of 50% 16 l/hDiesel 8 l/h

LNG 7 kg/h

Economic Results Diesel Dual Fuel

Fuel cost savings 21%

average per year from 18,00019.2* 15.2*

CO2 Reduction Diesel Dual Fuel

Average CO2 emissions reduction 8% Average per year 15,000 Kg

42.6 Kg/h** 39.3 Kg/h**

* Diesel costs in Italy 1.2 €/l; LNG costs 0.8 €/l

** 2.566 kg CO2/l of LNG; 2.663 kg CO2/l of Diesel


Pilot Results


33/43




34/43



REAL TIME ENERGY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM


35/43


Port of Koper - Energy Monitoring System



36/43


CONTENTS

1. Project Overview

2. Why GREENCRANES?




37/43


Smart, Energy Efficient and

Adaptive Port Terminals



38/43


Implementing Bodies:



39/43

SEA TERMINALS: Three Complementary Approaches for European Ports

Smart Energy Management: Integral Monitoring of Container Terminal (Energy + Operations)

o Design, prototyping and deployment of a Smart, Energy Efficient and Adaptive Management

System – SEAMS Platform

o Integral Monitoring of Port Container Terminal: SEAMS Platform + BlackBox Concept

Deployment and Demonstration of Last Generation Low/Zero Emission Prototypes

o Full Electric Terminal Tractor (SEA-eTractor)

o Hybrid (SEA-HRTG) and Dual-Fuel (SEA-DFRTG) Rubber Tyred Gantry Crane

o Eco-Efficient Reach Stacker (SEA-EcoRS) and ForkLift (SEA-EcoLIFT)

o Terminal Dynamic Illumination (SEA-Light)

o LNG Supply Mobile Module Designed for Port Operations

Facilitation and Development of an LNG Supply Network for European Ports



40/43



Smart, Energy Efficient and Adaptive Port Terminals – SEA TERMINALS


41/43


Smart, Energy Efficient and Adaptive Port Terminals – SEA TERMINALS


Hybrid / LNG Dual Fuel RTG Full Electric Terminal Tractor Eco - Reach Stacker

Dynamic Lighting Management LNG Supply Mobile Station for Ports


42/43


Contribution to a progressive and quick decarbonisation of port container activities inEurope, thus reducing GHG and pollutant emissions.

Demonstration of feasibility (financial, technical and environmental) of mature

integrated solutions based on smart energy management, eco-efficient technologies and

alternative fuels applied to port machinery and equipment.

Provision of an innovative and market-sided approach in the way that energy is managedat port terminals, considering it as key driver for improving operations and

competitiveness.

Promotion of a collaborative framework among ports, port operators and equipment

manufacturers, thus establishing new relationships not only based on commercial

interests but also on common innovation opportunities.

Transfer of the project outputs to as many as possible stakeholders at European level in

order to accelerate the evolution of the port sector towards a low-carbon emission

operative model.

Expected Results



43/43

Consortium:

GREENCRANES, AN ACTION DEVELOPED THANKS TO:

THANKS FOR YOUR ATTENTION!

José Andrés Giménez

[email protected] Technical Manager

ponencia jagimenez greenport greencranes 16102014

Documents