KOLHAPUR ZILLA PARISHAD(Rural Water Supply Division)

POLLUTION ABATEMENT OF

PANCHGANGA RIVER

Need of Project

• Contamination of river mainly due to - Disposal of liquid and solid waste from the villages and cities

like Kolhapur and Ichalkaranji- Disposal of Industrial solid and liquid waste

• Cholera epidemic in March 2010 in Rukadi, Taluka Hatkangale

• ZP, Kolhapur has to prepare plan as per order dated 10/05/2013 passed by Hon’ble High court

Panchganga River in Polluted River Streches of NRCP

The National River Conservation Plan (NRCP) guidelines has published list of “Polluted River Stretches” as declared by Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB). The list is given in Annexure 6 of NRCP guidelines December 2010. The list includes the Panchganga river (BOD between 6-10 mg/l).

CPCB Norms

Parameter Unit Effluent Standards Remarks

pH 5.5-9.0

BOD mg/l 20Tested sample BOD

more than 80 to 500

TSS mg/l 30

Faecal Coliform

MPN per 100 ml

Desirable - <1000, Max Permissible -10000

Waste water discharged into water bodies

Parameter Unit Effluent Standards pH 6.5-8.5

BOD mg/l 3 (mg/l) or lessDO mg/l 5 (mg/l) or more

Faecal ColiformDesirable

Maximum permissibleMPN per 100 ml 500 (MPN/100 ml)

2500 (MPN/100 ml)

Water Quality Standard for River

Population in Panchaganga Basin

• 174 GP’s from 7 tahsils (Pop.-8.75 Lakhs)• Kolhapur Municipal Corporation (Population-5.49 Lakhs) • Ichalkaranji Municipal Council (Pop-2.87 Lakhs)

174 Villages51%Kolhapur

Municipal Corporation

32%

Ichalkaranji Municipal Council

17%174 Villages

Kolhapur Municipal Corporation

Ichalkaranji Municipal Council

Tributaries of River

Panchganga River Basin

1. Kasari and Bhogawati are the main tributaries of the Panchganga river

2. Tulashi, Dhamani, Kumbhi are the tribituriesof Bhogawati River

3. Panchaganga Basin area covers the 33% of the district area

4. There are 973 streams joining the river and its tributaries

Panchganga Basin in Kolhapur District

Project Phases• Phase I

- First Priority- Villages adding to major Contamination - Priority Villages – 38 covered from Karveer, Hatkangale

and Shirol Tahasils- Detailed study & Detailed project Report.- 6 Villages in NABARD-LWM, DPR of only solid waste

management(1.Shiroli, 2 Kabnoor , 3. Pattan Kodali, 4. Hupari, 5.Rukadi

6.Shirol)

- 2 Villages in EDP, GoM (1.Uchgaon 2. Hatkangale)

- Cost not considered in DPR

• Phase II

- Pre-feasibility Report of 136 villages

Villages in Phase I

1 Hatkanagle

2 Tilavani

3 Rui

4 Chandur

5 Shiroli

6 Kabnoor

7 Pattan Kodoli

8 Hupari

9 Rukadi

1 Nrushinwadi

2 Shirol

3 Nandani

4 Shirdwad

5 Shirdhon

15 Uchgav

16 Kalambe Turf

Thane

17 Pachgaon

18 Ambewadi

19 Kuditre

20 Koparde

21 Kothali

22 Kandgaon

23 Morewadi

24 Chinchwad

1 Padali bk

2 Parite

3 Balinge

4 Vadanage

5 Vasagade

6 Valivade

7 Varange

8 Shinganapur

9 Nagdevwadi

10 Hanmantwadi

11 Haldi

12 Gandhinagar

13 Vakare

14 Prayag Chikhali

Taluka-Hatkanangale

Taluka-Shirol

Taluka-Karveer

• Base map preparation

• Data collection

• Flow measurement at all outfalls

• Sewage sample testing

• Topographical survey

• Assessment of present rate of water supply and liquid waste generation

• Present facilities with G.P. for collection of solid waste

• Technology selection

• Land availability assessment

• Designing for next 15 years considering base Year 2014

• Cost estimation

• Drawings

Methodology

Categorization of Phase I villages24 villages (Severe and continuous Polluting)Karveer - Balinge, Gandhinagar,Haladi, Hanamantwadi,

Kandgaon, Koparde, Kothali, Kuditare, Nagdevwadi, Parite, Shinganapur,

Uchgaon, Vakare, Valiwade, Varange, Hatkanagale - Chandur, Hatkangale, Kabnoor, Rui, Shiroli, TilawaniShirol Taluka - Nandani, Nrusinhwadi, Shirol

09 villages (Intermittent and medium Polluting )Karveer - Kalambe Tarf Thane, Morewadi, Pachgaon, Padali

Bk.VadanageHatkangale – Hupari, Pattankodali, RukadiShirol - Shiradwad

05villages (Not directly polluting the river )Karveer - Ambewadi, Chinchwad, Prayag Chikhali, VasagadeShirol - Shirdhone

• Detail engineering as per CPHEEO guidelines

• Design Years-Base year -2014,Year 2029 and year 2044

• Population Forecasting

• Projected water demand (@70lpcd) and liquid waste generation (80%)

• Rate of water supply considered -70lpcd

• Comparing quantity of present and projected liquid waste and maximum flow considered for design

Design Consideration

Sewage Sample Testing

Parameter No. of Villages

BOD-Up to 250 (mg/l)- Up to 250 (mg/l) -17 Villages –Average - 250 to 400 (mg/l) -6 Villages – Concentrated- More than 400 (mg/l) -8 Villages- Highly Concentrated

COD – More than 250 (mg/l) 22 Villages

Faecal Coliform (MPN/100 ml) All villages are in expected limit (< 1000)

Total Ammonical Nitrogen (mg/l) 27 villages -above limit due to liquid waste from Gothhaand leachate of Ukirde (Help to Growth of Water Hyacinth)

Phosphate (mg/l)27 villages – Above Limit due to liquid waste from Gothhaand leachate of Ukirde(Help to Growth of Water Hyacinth)

• Sewage sample of all villages tested in MPCB laboratory at Chiplun• 12 parameters tested, tested parameters are given below-

Sr. No. Parameter Sr. No. Parameter1 TSS 7 Total Phosphate2 TDS 8 Total Ammonical Nitrogen3 pH 9 Nitrate Nitrogen4 BOD 10 Total Coliform (MPN/100)5 COD 11 Fecal Coliform (MPN/100)6 Oil and Grease 12 Detergent

Result Analysis

Sewage Generation at Present

Block Phase I No. of Outfall Sewage generation in mld

Karveer 23 99 19.23

Hatkangale 03 14 2.78

Shirol 04 19 5.19

Total 30 132 27.20

MJP LWM villages 06 1.Shiroli, 2 Kabnoor , 3. Pattan Kodali, 4. Hupari, 5.Rukadi 6.Shirol

EDP Villages 02 1.Uchgaon, 2. Hatkangale

Total 38

Proposed Components

A.Liquid waste• Construction of main gutters• Sewage Treatment - Solid Immobilised Bio Filter (SIBF)

- Leach Pits

B.Solid waste- Strengthening collection system-(Hand cart, Cycle cart, Rickshaw)- Organic Waste: Tumbler composting & Windrows Composting- In-organic Waste: Bailing Machine (Manually operated)

A) Liquid waste

• Solid Immobilised Bio Filter (SIBF) - Capacity – 16.80 mld(34 plants in 29 Villages)

• Leach Pits – 1.81 mld (74 Nos in 11 Villages)

B) Solid Waste

• Strengthening collection system

1) Hand Cart : 39 Nos.- 10 Villages2) Cycle Cart : 74 Nos - 29 villages 3) Auto Rickshaw : 29 Nos - 18 villages

• Tumbler Composting : 50 Units in 8 villages (For 2.50 T cap.) • Windrows composting : 28 Villages, (For 44 T cap.)• Bailing Machine (Manually operated) -60 Nos in 36 villages

-

Proposal for Liquid and Solid waste

Technology Capacity in Ton

Villages Covered

Remarks

Compost Tumbler

2.50 8 1.Haladi, 2.Kandgaon, 3.Padali bk. 4.Varanage, 5.Hanamantwadi, 6.Ambewadi, 7.Tilawani, 8. Kothali

Windrows Composting

44.00 29 1.Parite, 2.Koparde, 3.Kuditre, 4.Vakare, 5.Balinge, 6.Shinganapur, 7.Prayag Chikhali, 8.Vadanage, 9.Kalambe Turf Thane, 10.Rukadi, 11.Vasagade, 12.Pattan Kodoli, 13.Rui, 14.Yalgud, 15.Chandur, 16.Shirdwad, 17.Shirdhon, 18.Nandani, 19.Nrushinwadi,20 Nagdevwadi,21.Pachgaon 22. Morewadi23.Gandhinagar, 24.Valivade 25.Chinchwad 26.Hupari, 27.Shirol, 28.Shiroli, 29.Kabnoor

Total 46.50 37

Proposal for organic waste

Canna plants

CROSS SECTION OF BIOFILTER

Ecosystem

`

70 cm

Wastewater

Underdrain

SOME SIBF SYSTEM INSTALLATIONS

Art of Living - Main Ashram, Karnataka [500 cu.m/d]

Bharati Hospital & Medical College,

Maharashtra [400 cu.m/d]

ZCPL – Food Industry,Maharashtra [150 cu.m/d]

Vehicles for solid waste collection

TRICYCLE CARTAuto Rickshaw

Hand cart

Compost Tumbler Windrows Composting

Bailing Machine Pyrolysis Plant

Land requirements• Liquid Waste

- Gairan Land - 17 Villages,- Grampanchayat Land - 3 Villages- Kuran Mandal - 1 Villages- GoM - 2 Villages- Private Soc.Land - 4 Village- Not Available - 2 Nos (Along road side)

• Solid Waste

Tumbler Composting - GP land in Goathan -8 Villages

Windrows Composting - Gairan Land -16 Villages,- Grampanchayat Land -02 Village- Sugar factory -01 Village

Project Cost

Sr.

No. Sub work

Amount

(Lakhs)

1 Liquid Waste Management 8,715.98

2 Solid Waste Management 1,362.71

3Community Participation and capacity

building8.00

Total Net Cost 10,086.69

4

Other Costs -8%

(Contingency, Insurance, Project

Management Consultancy, Administrations

etc)

806.94

Gross cost 10,893.62

Cost Sharing

Sr.

No.Fund Contribution by

Amount

(Lakhs)

1 Govt. of India 70% 7,625.54

2 Govt. of Maharashtra 20% 2,178.72

3

Grampanchayat /Zilla Parishad, Kolhapur

10%1,089.36

4 Total 10,893.62

Project Cost-LWMSr.

No.Location Quantity Unit

Amount

(lakhs)

A)

1 Gutter Construction 15245 Rmt 516.41

2Leach Pit (Size - 6m x

6m x 3m)74 Rmt 127.83

3 Gravity Mains 4290 Rmt 130.47

4Sump and Pump

House33 Nos 966.08

5 Rising Mains 23750 Rmt 314.57

6 Receiving Chember 1 Nos 2.52

7Sewage Treatment

Plant (SIBF Tech.)16.8 MLD 5,359.22

7.1 Compound wall 5195 Rmt 883.36

7.2 Retaining wall 530 Rmt 225.29

7.3 Internal road 1470 Rmt 117.36

7.4 Earth filling 1025 Cum 56.36

7.5 Landscaping 0 Sqm 0.00

8MSEB charges for

Electrical Connection33 Nos

9 Total-LWM 8,715.98

Project Cost - SWMSr.

No.Location Quantity Unit

Amount

(lakhs)

A) Collection System

1 Providing and Supplying vehicles

1.1 Hand Cart 39 Nos 1.95

1.2 Cycle Cart 74 Nos 6.66

1.3 Auto Rickshaw 29 Nos 93.40

1.4 Plastic Bucket 412 Nos 6.18

Sub Total A 108.19

B) Organic Waste

2 Tumbles for composting

2.1 Tumblers (Capacity -1200 Liters, 50Kg/day composting

capacity)50 Nos 37.50

Sub Total 2 37.50

3 Windrows

3.1 Windrow Sheds (24 X 11.5 m) 71 Nos 962.41

3.2 Segregation Platform (3x2x1m) 28 Nos 9.02

3.3 Shreding Platform (3x2x1m) 28 Nos 15.78

3.4 Storage Room (5 x 3m) 28 Nos 112.19

3.5 Chain Link Fencing 4410 Rmt 81.62

Sub Total 3 1,181.02

Sub Total B 1,218.52

C) In-Organic Waste

4 Bailing Machine

4.1 Bailing Machine (5Kg capacity) 60 Nos 36.00

Sub Total 4 36.00

Sub Total C 36.00

5 Total Cost - SWM 1,362.71

O&M Cost

Liquid waste management

-Annual O & M Cost : Rs. 1.03 Crores

-Revenue from Treated Water : Rs. 0.67 Crores

(22,27,500 Cum)

-Total Deficit : Rs 0.36 Crores

Solid waste management

-Annual O & M Cost : Rs. 1.73 Crores

-Revenue from Solid waste i.e. : Rs. 2.48 Crores

-Compost -6776 T : (Rs.1.35 Crores)

-Inorganic – 2244 T : (Rs.1.18 Crores)

-Total Surplus : Rs. 0.75 Crores.

Overall Deficit/year : Rs.0.35 Crores

Taxation Proposal

Considering the surpus and deficit of LWM and SWM component in each

village, annual deficit is of Rs 0.35 Crores in 23 villages. Additional LWM and

SWM tax is proposed in 23 villages. It is expected that deficit amount of Rs.0.35

Crores will be collected by proposing additional taxes in 23 villages. The range

of taxes is given below-

• Less than Rs.100 per year : 8 Villages

• Between Rs.101 to Rs. 200 : 11 Villages

• Rs. 201 to Rs. 500 : 4 Villages

Project Benefit• Total liquid waste treated – 16.80 mld,

• The proposed investment for the treatment of liquid waste is Rs 87.15 Crores.

• 16 mld would be available for reuse daily

• The area that will be irrigated with respect to the crops is as follows:

Sr.

NoCrop Water Required Land to be Irrigated (Approx.)

1. Cash Crop (Agronomical) 2500mm 185 Ha

2. Food Grain crops 700mm 650 Ha

3. Oil Seed Crops 670mm 680 Ha

4. Pulses 600mm 760 Ha

In addition, treated WW from larger STPs can be supplied to local industries

Other benefits• Treatment of the sewage prior to its disposal in the river would

prevent the river from being polluted.

• The health of the people in the villages situated at the downstream will not be affected.

• Epidemics of Cholera, Gastro and Jaundice would be prevented.

• This would make a healthy environment for villages.

• The quality of water will improve making it a suitable source for water supply schemes

• The marine ecosystem will improve within and in its surrounding. This would help is growth of the fishes within the river. Pisiculturecan be practiced

• Recycling of the waste plastics generated within the village would reduce the impact of the materials on the environment and can be effectively reused

• Improvement in quality of water will help to use the river as a nearest source of drinking water.

• This will decrease the operational cost to some extend of the water supply schemes and ultimately reducing the burden of the villagers.

• Growth of the fishes will again increase making a way for the fishery industry to progress.

• Local fishermen will be benefited.