ACCEPTED

FORPR

OCESSIN

G-2020

Decem

ber29:14

AM-SC

PSC-2019-209-E

-Page1of3

Duke, Da hne

From:Sent:To:Cc:

Subject:

Weston Adams &weston.adamslnelsonmullins.corn&Tuesday, December 1, 2020 1:23 PM

Stark, David

chad.burgessldominionenergy.corn; matthew.gissendanner@dominionenergy.corn;Nelson, Jeff; Grube-Lybarker, Carri; richardlrlwhitt.law; Jamey Goldin google; Belton T.

Zeigler, seaton@spilmanlaw.corn; dwilliamson@spilmanlaw.corn;cgrundmannlspilmanlaw.corn; Court Walsh; Hall, Roger, Pittman, Jenny; PSC Contact[External] Re~0-209-E Proceeding

David:

Sorry for our delay in responding. Johnson Development has no objection to a paper proceeding in this Docket. Thanks-Weston

Sent from my iPhone

On Dec 1, 2020, at 11:07 AM, Stark, David &david.stark@psc.sc.gov& wrote:

&External Email% - From: david.stark@psc.sc.gov

Parties:

I am writing to you regarding Docket No. 2020-209-E; South Carolina Energy Freedom Act (House Bill

3659) Proceeding Related to Dominion Energy South Carolina, Incorporated and S.C. Code Ann. Section58-41-30 Related to Electrical Utilities and Their Current Voluntary Renewable Energy Program, andSuch Other Proceedings Required By the Commission.

The Commission has received communications that the Company, ORS, the SBA, and Walmart do notobject to the use of a paper proceeding in this docket. However, there has been no indication orcommunications on this matter from Johnson Development. If you would all be so kind, would eachparty indicate if they object or do not object to the use of a paper proceeding in this docket'?

Regards,

David StarkAttorneySouth Carolina Public Service Commissiondavid.starkopsc.sc.gov

Nelson Mullins is continuing to monitor developments related to COVID-19, including guidance from the Centers forDisease Control and various health officials; and federal, state, and local government authorities. The firm hasimplemented precautionary measures and plans to ensure the continuation of all firm services to clients from both inoffice and remote work arrangements across our 25 geographically disperse offices. Click here to visit the NelsonMullins Coronavirus Resources a e Information described therein is subject to change.

ACCEPTED

FORPR

OCESSIN

G-2020

Decem

ber29:14

AM-SC

PSC-2019-209-E

-Page2of3

Confidentiality NoticeThis message is intended exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This communication maycontain information that is proprietary, privileged, confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure. If you arenot the named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or disseminate this message or any part ofit. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately either by phone (800-237-2000) orreply to this e-mail and delete all copies of this message.

ACCEPTED

FORPR

OCESSIN

G-2020

Decem

ber29:14

AM-SC

PSC-2019-209-E

-Page3of3

Duke, Da hne

From:Sent:To:Cc:

Subject:

Richard Whitt &richard@rlwhitt.law&Tuesday, December 1, 2020 1:58 PM

Stark, Davidchad.burgess@dominionenergy.corn; matthew.gissendanner@dominionenergy.corn;Nelson, Jeff; Grube-Lybarker, Carri; Jamey Goldin google; Belton T. Zeigler;seaton@spilmanlaw.corn; dwilliamson@spilmanlaw.corn; cgrundmann@spilmanlaw.corn;court.walsh@nelsonmullins.corn; Weston Adams; Hall, Roger; Pittman, Jenny;PSC Contact; Carrie Schurg[External] 2019-209-E Proceeding

David:

No objection by the South Carolina Solar Business Alliance, Inc.

Regards,Richard Whitt,As Counsel for the SCSBA.

Sent from my iPhone

On Dec 1, 2020, at 11:07 AM, Stark, David &david.starkcapsc.sc.gov& wrote:

Parties:

I am writing to you regarding Docket No. 2020-209-E; South Carolina Energy Freedom Act (House Bill

3659) Proceeding Related to Dominion Energy South Carolina, Incorporated and S.C. Code Ann. Section58-41-30 Related to Electrical Utilities and Their Current Voluntary Renewable Energy Program, andSuch Other Proceedings Required By the Commission.

The Commission has received communications that the Company, ORS, the SBA, and Walmart do notobject to the use of a paper proceeding in this docket. However, there has been no indication orcommunications on this matter from Johnson Development. If you would all be so kind, would eachparty indicate if they object or do not object to the use of a paper proceeding in this docket?

Regards,

David StarkAttorneySouth Carolina Public Service Commissiondavid.starktepsc.sc.gov