pilot cospar2018 aumont 2018-07-20graca/cospar-talks/s2_3_pilot_cospar2018_aumont... · jonathan...
TRANSCRIPT
PILOTA far-infrared balloon-borne polarization experiment
Jonathan AumontIRAP — Toulouse, France
J.-Ph. Bernard (PI), A. Mangilli, A. Hughes, G. Foënard, I. Ristorcelli, G. De Gasperis, H. Roussel,on behalf of the PILOT Collaboration
COSPAR-18 - Pasadena - July 20th 2018
1.2 THz far-infrared polarization experiment★Reveal the structure of the magnetic field
in our Galaxy and nearby galaxies
★Characterize the geometric and magnetic properties of the dust grains
★Understand polarized foregrounds
★Complete the Planck observations at a higher frequency where the dust polarization has never been observed over large sky regions
PILOT
Planck Collaboration: The Planck mission
Fig. 15. Maximum posterior amplitude polarization maps derived from the Planck observations between 30 and 353 GHz(Planck Collaboration X 2015). The left and right columns show the Stokes Q and U parameters, respectively. Rows show, from topto bottom: CMB; synchrotron polarization at 30 GHz; and thermal dust polarization at 353 GHz. The CMB map has been highpass-filtered with a cosine-apodized filter between ` = 20 and 40, and the Galactic plane (defined by the 17 % CPM83 mask) has beenreplaced with a constrained Gaussian realization (Planck Collaboration IX 2015).
10 30 100 300 1000
Frequency (GHz)
10
-110
010
110
2
RM
S b
rig
htn
ess
tem
per
atu
re (
µK
)
CMB
Thermal dust
Free-freeSynchrotron
30 44 70 100 143 217 353 545 857
Spinning dust
CO 1-0
Sum fg
10 30 100 300 1000
Frequency (GHz)
10
-110
010
110
2
RM
S b
rig
htn
ess
tem
per
atu
re (
µK
)
CMB
Thermal dust
Synchrotron
30 44 70 100 143 217 353
Sum fg
Fig. 16. Brightness temperature rms as a function of frequency and astrophysical component for temperature (left) and polarization(right). For temperature, each component is smoothed to an angular resolution of 1� FWHM, and the lower and upper edges of eachline are defined by masks covering 81 and 93 % of the sky, respectively. For polarization, the corresponding smoothing scale is 400,and the sky fractions are 73 and 93 %.
10. Planck 2015 cosmology results
Since their discovery, anisotropies in the CMB have contributedsignificantly to defining our cosmological model and measuringits key parameters. The standard model of cosmology is basedupon a spatially flat, expanding Universe whose dynamics aregoverned by General Relativity and dominated by cold dark mat-ter and a cosmological constant (⇤). The seeds of structure haveGaussian statistics and form an almost scale-invariant spectrumof adiabatic fluctuations. The 2015 Planck data remain in excel-
lent agreement with this paradigm, and continue to tighten theconstraints on deviations and reduce the uncertainty on the keycosmological parameters.
The major methodological changes in the steps goingfrom sky maps to cosmological parameters are discussedin Planck Collaboration XII (2015); Planck Collaboration XIII(2015). These include the use of Planck polarization data in-stead of WMAP, changes to the foreground masks to includemore sky and dramatically reduce the number of point source“holes,” minor changes to the foreground models, improve-
23
PIL
OT
Planck
PILOT - Instrument
M1
M2
M3
ICS
SteppedHWP
Lens
45°polarizer
Detectorarrays
4
SteppedHWP
PolariserREFLEX (-)
TRANS (+)
83 7
6 25 1
1024 (485) bolometers
1024 (750) bolometers
★Multiplexed bolometer arrays with a total of 2048 detectors at 240 !m (1249 GHz), 2’ resolution
★Observations at more than 2 HWP angles to reconstruct the Stokes parameters I, Q, U
★Detectors cooled down to 0.3 K through closed-cycle 3He fridge
★NEP ★Control of systematics and detector response at 1% level
∼ 4 × 10−16 W/Hz1/2
[The
PIL
OT C
olla
bora
tion
, Ber
nard
et a
l. 20
16]
Lens
1st flightTimmins, Canada
24 h
2015
3rd flightTimmins, Canada
2019?
2nd flightAlice Springs, Australia
33 h
2017
PILOT
1st flightTimmins, Canada
24 h
2015
3rd flightTimmins, Canada
2019?
2nd flightAlice Springs, Australia
33 h
2017
Toulouse, FrancePILOT DPC
PILOT
Galactic plane, 1.7 h, 7.1 %Star forming regions, 9.9 h, 41.6 %
Galaxies, 6.1 h, 25.6 %Diffuse field, 4.8 h, 20.2 %
Planets, 0.8 h, 3.5 %Calibrations in all these scenes, 1.2 h, 5%
Total: 23.8 h
April 16th, 2017 from Alice Springs, Australia★ Total flight time: 33.5 h★ Scientific data: 23.8 h★ Ceiling altitude: 32-40 Km
BICEP30x12°
Note: most of these sources are not observable in balloon from South Pole (e.g. BLASTPol, SPIDER)
PILOT - 2nd flight
LMC4x2°
Orion5x10°
Musca2x3°
L02x5°
L305x5°
rho-Oph9x4°
Planck 353 GHz Imap
PILOT - Scanning strategy
HWP rotation
Slew
Elevation and azimuth adjustments
ScanICS calibration sequence
Focal plane footprint on the sky
Target region
Azimuth
Elev
atio
n
[The PILOT Collaboration, Foënard et al. 2018]
★ In-flight good optical quality and nominal resolution
PILOT - In-flight performances Jupiter
2.3’ FWHM
[The PILOT Collaboration, Foënard et al. 2018]
★ In-flight good optical quality and nominal resolution
★ In-flight background has a similar shape but is a factor ~2 stronger than ground measurements. Polarized at 4-10 % level
★Variation of the detector responses due to polarized background & atmosphere variations. Modelled and corrected to better than 2 %
PILOT - In-flight performances
29 h
ICS
resp
onse
(AD
U) measured
model
Jupiter
2.3’ FWHM
[The PILOT Collaboration, Foënard et al. 2018]
★ In-flight good optical quality and nominal resolution
★ In-flight background has a similar shape but is a factor ~2 stronger than ground measurements. Polarized at 4-10 % level
★Variation of the detector responses due to polarized background & atmosphere variations. Modelled and corrected to better than 2 %
★Pointing offset varies during flight. Pointing model constructed from elevation + temperatures and Herschel comparison, better than 1’
★Spurious polarization measured on Jupiter of ~ 3 %
PILOT - In-flight performances
29 h
ICS
resp
onse
(AD
U) measured
model
Jupiter
2.3’ FWHM
Orioncontour = Herschel
[The PILOT Collaboration, Foënard et al. 2018]
★ In-flight good optical quality and nominal resolution
★ In-flight background has a similar shape but is a factor ~2 stronger than ground measurements. Polarized at 4-10 % level
★Variation of the detector responses due to polarized background & atmosphere variations. Modelled and corrected to better than 2 %
★Pointing offset varies during flight. Pointing model constructed from elevation + temperatures and Herschel comparison, better than 1’
★Spurious polarization measured on Jupiter of ~ 3 %
★ In-flight white noise levels as expected; noise stability over the whole flight
+ Significant improvements in ongoing analyses
PILOT - In-flight performances
29 h
ICS
resp
onse
(AD
U) measured
model
Jupiter
2.3’ FWHM
Orioncontour = Herschel
29 h
Time-frequency noise power spectra for matrix 6
0 Hz
0.1 Hz
1 Hz
10 Hz
PILOT - Preliminary I maps
L0
Orion
L30
𝛒-OphiuchiGalactic longitude Galactic longitude
Gal
actic
latit
ude
Gal
actic
latit
ude
0° 359°1°
-148°-150°-152°-154°
29°30°31°32°
353°354°355°356°
18°
17°
16°
15°
-20°
-19°
-18°
-17°
-16°
-1°3
0’-1
°00’
-0°3
0’0°
00’
0°30
’1°
00’
1°30
’
-1°0
0’-0
°30’
0°00
’-0
°30’
PILOT - Preliminary polarization mapsG
alac
tic la
titud
e0°
+2°
-2°
-4°
Galactic longitude0° 359° 358°1°2°
Galactic longitude0° 359° 358°1°2°
Galactic longitude0° 359° 358°1°2°
Preliminary polarization results PILOT data in L0 field
Total Intensity polar Q polar U
maps shown in EQU-IAU convention at pixel size 1.7’ (Nside=2048)
Preliminary polarization results PILOT data in L0 field
Total Intensity polar Q polar U
maps shown in EQU-IAU convention at pixel size 1.7’ (Nside=2048)
Preliminary polarization results PILOT data in L0 field
Total Intensity polar Q polar U
maps shown in EQU-IAU convention at pixel size 1.7’ (Nside=2048)
[The PILOT Collaboration, Mangilli et al. 2018 in prep.]
UQI
★Stokes parameters I, Q and U in the L0 Galactic plane region★Strong signal but low polarization fraction
PILOT - Comparison to Planck
ψ =12
⋅ atan ( UQ )
[The PILOT Collaboration, Mangilli et al. 2018 in prep.]
Prel
imin
ary
PILOT - Comparison to Planck
ψ =12
⋅ atan ( UQ )
[The PILOT Collaboration, Mangilli et al. 2018 in prep.]
PILOT
353 GHz
217 GHz
143 GHz
Planck 2015data release
Prel
imin
ary
PILOT - Comparison to Planck
ψ =12
⋅ atan ( UQ )
[The PILOT Collaboration, Mangilli et al. 2018 in prep.]
PILOT353 GHz
217 GHz
143 GHz
Prel
imin
ary
Planck 2018data release
Preliminary
0�0000000 359�300 359�0000�3001�000
Longitude
0�00
0 000
0�
300
�1�
000
300
1�00
0La
titud
eG
alac
tic la
titud
e
Galactic longitude
0°00
’00’
’30
’1°
00-3
0’-1
°00’
0°00’00’’ 359°30’ 359°0030’1°00’
PILOT - Direction of the magnetic field
[The PILOT Collaboration, Mangilli et al. 2018 in prep.]
PILOT - “BICEP” region
PBSA/IDS
SPT3G
SPTPolBICEP2
PILOT
α = 0°30°
60°
90°
120°
150°
180°
-150°
-120°
-90°
-60°
-30°
δ = 0°
-30°
-60°
PILOT - “BICEP” region
log 1
0(N
hits)
4.3
3.2
α = 0°
30°
60°
90°
150°
180°
-150°
-120°
-90°
-60°
-30°δ = 0°
-30°
-60°
PILOT
120°
inN s
ide
=51
2pi
xels
★ 4.8 h of data during flight2
★BICEP field observed with 4 tiles, each of them being observed at least twice with 2 different HWP positions
★Goal signal to noise ratio of ~20 on thepolarized intensity integrated over the whole field
★Unique data for constraining the SED or for correlation analyses in CMB observations
PILOT - Legacy
coPILOT
IDS
EBEX
2013
SPICA-Pol
★ coPILOT: modification of PILOT will allow very accurate measurements of C+ (158 µm) total intensity. Dark molecular gas distribution in solar neighborhood, nearby galaxies. Submitted to CNES
★ IDS (Inflation and Dust Surveyor): CMB B-modes + dust, proposed to NASA 2018. Contribution to provide PILOT attitude control + internal calibration source
★SPICA-Pol: polarized instrument on SPICA. Design and science case strongly inspired from PILOT. Accepted in pre-phaseA/0.
★BOOST proposal (IRAP) to lower detector temperature to 150 mK. Increase in sensitivity by 2.7 for PILOT, up to 14 for CoPilot
PILOT - Summary
★Operational and instrumental success of the PILOT two flights
★Unique experiment: observation of the dust polarization at 1.2 THz over large regions of the sky relevant for cosmology
★PILOT legacy for future instruments
★Data analysis in progress. No showstopper for the moment but we are a small team!
PILOT - Improvements after 1st flight
+ arrays #1 and #3 were repaired★ ground tests: array #3 ok, arrays #1 and #5 not working★ in flight: arrays #1, #3 and #5 not working: -17%
+ autonomy tests at 300 mK accomplished ★ detectors were operated 20 mK lower than flight#1 (305 mK): +26%★ in-flight autonomy was longer than the long flight (>33.5 hr)
+ Field stop size increased to avoid edge effects in polarization★ polarization now ok everywhere: gain of 0.6 arrays: +10%
+ Longer flight (flight#1: 14.8hr, flight#2: 23.8 hr): +60%
+ Front baffle thermal insulation was re-designed★ no deterioration observed in flight. No sign of external straylight.
+ More efficient observing strategy implemented★ scans at varying elevation (better control of response variations + de-stripping)★ region of interest mapping (saves 20% of of target time)
= Total: +100%★ important qualitative improvements: less straylight, more scan directions more
HWP positions, more strong pointing sources