photocatalytic degradation of organics elizabeth buitrago university of arizona department of...
TRANSCRIPT
Photocatalytic Degradation of Organics
Elizabeth Buitrago
University of Arizona
Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering
Grad Student Mentor: Mike Schmotzer
Faculty Advisor: Dr. Farhang Shadman
UPW Use
• Wet standard operations account 1/3 of total processing steps:– Standard cleans.– Wet etch processes. – Chemical mechanical planarization (CMP)
• Wafer is redundantly cleaned to remove contaminants and prepare the surfaces between processes.
The Concern
• More than 3000 gallons of UPW can be used to process an 8 inch wafer from start to finish.
• Present semiconductor fabrication facilities (FABS) typically use 1-3 million gallons of UPW per day.
• Final UPW quality highest of any industry.
• Contaminants remaining in water end up in wafer surfaces, render a device non-functional.
Water Quality Parameter
Units Typical Municipal Water Supply
Typical Ultrapure Water Product
Resistivity M ohms-cm 0.004 >18
pH Units 8 6
TOC ppb 3500 <10
Ammonium ppb 300 <1
Calcium ppb 22000 <1
Magnesium ppb 4000 <1
Potassium ppb 4500 <10
Silica ppb 4780 <1
Sodium ppb 29000 <1
Chloride ppb 15000 <1
Fluoride ppb 740 <1
Sulfate ppb 42000 <1
Overview
• Goals and objectives
• Introduction/ background– TiO2 as a photocatalyst/photocatalytic process
– Role of promoters in catalytic oxidation (Ag)
– Effects of nitrogen doping in TiO2
• Experimental
• Results/Highlights
• Future goals
Goals and Objectives
• Develop new method for photocatalytic oxidation of organics:– Lower the energy use through catalytic oxidation
(UV 185nm used 2003 UV 254 nm used 2004).– Reduce the use of chemicals.
Introduction: Photocatalytic Process
Photo-generation
electron/hole pairs
Formation of radicals
Radical oxidation of
Organic compound.
TiO2 hv
e- + h+
h+ + H2O OH + H+
e- + O2 O2-
O2- + H+ HO2
TOC + Ox(radical) TOC (partially oxidized species) + CO2 + H2O
Role of Promoters in Photocatalytic Process
)M(eeM
(energy)TiOhe 2
Photo-generation electron/hole
pairs
Formation of radicals (Ox- radical)
Radical oxidation of organic
compound.
Recombination of electron/hole pair
Metal attracts free electron
slows recombination and
promotes radical formation
TiO2 hv
e- + h+
h+ + H2O OH + H+
e- + O2 O2-
O2- + H+ HO2
TOC + Ox TOC(partially oxidized species) + CO2 + H2O
Conduction Bande- e- e- e- e- e- e- e- e- e- e- e-
Role of Promoters in TiO2 Photocatalytic process
Valence Bandh+ h+ h+ h+ h+ h+ h+ h+ h+ h+
Electron/hole pairrecombination
Electron/hole pair generation
Metallic promoter attracts electrons from TiO2 conduction band and slows recombination reaction
e-(M) <-- M+e-
Eg
Effects of Nitrogen Doping in TiO2
TiO2 BondOrbitals
TiO2-xNx BondOrbitals
Conduction Band
Ti d + (O2p) Ti d +O2p +N2p)
Valence Band
N2p + O2p
O2P + (Ti d) + (Ti d)
Energy
Ti d
O2p
Ti dN2pO2p
Addition of nitrogen increases the size of the bondorbitals, decreasing the energy bandgap
Eg = 3.2 eV Eg = 2.5 eV
Experimental
-Sol-gel method #1 3-TiO2 layers3-bakes
-Sol-gel method #23-TiO2 layers2-extra TiO2 coats Ag dopedbefore 3rth bake
-CVD method N2 doped
-Ethylene glycol-urea-Triton X-100 surfactant contaminants
Preparation of Supported Catalyst by ChemicalVapor Deposition Method (CVD)
Experimental Setup
14
Impregnation chamber
23HP
nitrogen cylinder
Stripper
TiCl4 reservoir
Experimental Setup for Batch Reactivity Testing
UV lamp 254 nm
Water bath/shaker/
lamp holder Coated screens
Ethylene glycol/UV 254 nm
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
time (hrs)
TO
C (ppb)…
TiO2#2
TiO2#1
CVD
Results and Highlights
Ethylene glycol
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
time(hrs)
TO
C (ppb)... TiO2
TiO2/Ag
Results and Highlights
Sol-gel method #2 used
Triton X-100
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
0 50 100 150 200time (hrs)
TOC
(ppb
)... TiO2
TiO2/Ag
Urea
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
time (hrs)TO
C (ppb)...
TiO2TiO2/Ag
Results and Highlights
Sol-gel method#2 used
Ethylene glycol/ 254 nm
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
0 20 40 60 80 100 120time (hrs)
TO
C (ppb)...
CVD/ N2blank
Results and Highlights
Model for Photocatalytic Reaction
evap
k
2k
22k
k2
2k
k2
r)(TOC)(OHkdt
d(TOC)
)(OHk)(TOC)(OHk)(hkdt
)d(OH
)(ek))(h(ekSkdt
)d(e
)(hk))(h(ekSkdt
)d(h
)M(eeM
OHOH
OHCOTOCOH
HOHOHh
(energy)TiOhe
hehvTiO
3
432
m11
211
m
4
3
2
1
1
1. Electron/hole formation
2. Electron/hole recombination
3. Radical formation
4. Oxidation of organics
5. Radical combining with X (anything other than TOC)
6. Metal attracts electron = 0 not metal present.
Ethylene glycol/UV 254 nm
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140time (hrs)
TO
C (ppb)
TiO2#2
TiO2#1
CVD
model #2
CVD model
model #1
Photocatalytic Model
TiO2#1 S = 3.5 CVD S = 10 TiO2 #2 S = 14 cm2
S = active surface area
Triton X100/ UV 254 nm
0
200
400
600
800
1000
0 50 100 150 200
time (hrs)
TO
C (ppb) model TiO2/Ag
model TiO2
TiO2
TiO2/Ag
Urea/ UV 254 nm
0
200
400
600
800
1000
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
time (hrs)
TO
C (p
pb)
model TiO2/Ag
model TiO2
TiO2
TiO2/Ag
Ethyl glycol/ UV 254 nm
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
time (hrs)
TO
C (ppb) TiO2/Ag
TiO2
TiO2/Ag model
TiO2 model
Photocatalytic Model
OHCOTOCOH 22k3 +¾ ®¾+·
Triton X100 k3 = 0.6ethylene glycol k3 = 0.4Urea k3 = 0.05
Future Goals
• Find new substrates for better deposition of TiO2.
• Investigate new ways that would improve our TiO2 loading method.
• Improve CVD method.
• Improve nitridation method.