philippines’ · dpwh da denr bsgcs algus: 2020 cce (nep levels) • 98% of the climate change...

MAINSTREAMING CLIMATE CHANGE IN BUDGET AND

INVESTMENT PROGRAMMING

Debt Management Facility Stakeholders’ Forum

May 22-23, 2017

PHILIPPINES’

The development and implementation of a climate budgeting system is a strategic

tool to support scaling and sustaining the implementation of the Philippines’

transformative climate agenda.

The Department of Budget and Management (DBM) and the Climate Change Commission (CCC) jointly sought to develop a climate budgeting system, with technical assistance from the World Bank.

The Climate Budgeting System aims to strengthen the planning, execution and financing framework for the government’s climate response. • Focus on identifying the public CC

response included in the national and local government budget

• Putting in place institutional arrangements to strengthen and mainstream the planning of the public climate response.

DEVELOPING A CLIMATE BUDGETING SYSTEMThe system is characterized with five key features:

The PH recognizes the need for progressive significant improvements and

increased transparency in the planning, prioritization, monitoring, and reporting of

climate response facilitated by an improved understanding of CC

expenditure as a means to mobilize the volume and effectiveness of financing

needed to fully implement its (Intended) Nationally Determined Contributions.

CLIMATE BUDGET SYSTEM

Policy Process Results Learnings

7


The DBM and CCC lead the implementation and institutionalization of the climate budgeting system within and across national and local government units.

• At the national level, the DBM and CCC issued Joint MemorandumCircular 2013-01 focused on climate change expenditure tagging atthe national level with progressive refinements in JMC 2015-01.

• In parallel, and together with the Department of Interior and LocalGovernment (DILG), the three NGAs issued JMC 2014-01, withprogressive refinements in JMC 2015-01 to operationalize climatechange expenditure tagging of the Annual Investment Programs(AIP).

• These are complemented by the Budget Priorities Framework (BPF),which identifies the Government’s key priorities in the allocation ofits available fiscal space along the KRAs. The BPF designates theDENR to lead and coordinate the Agencies under the Cabinet Clusteron Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation in formulating the RiskResiliency Program (RRP), which aims to strengthen thegovernment’s climate response through increased convergence andcoordination across NGA programs.

• The Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation – Disaster RiskReduction (CCAM-DRR) cluster adopted the CCAM-DRR Roadmap on18 January 2018 as the Cluster’s guiding framework in selecting andidentifying programs and projects towards combating climatechange and reducing disaster risk.

GOVERNMENT POLICIES TO IMPLEMENT AND INSTITUTIONALIZE CLIMATE BUDGETING


9

Roles of Selected Agencies on Climate Budgeting

Agency (Ministry) Mandate/Function Climate Budgeting Role

Department of Budget and Management

Public expenditure management

Lead in the integration of climate response in the prioritization, monitoring and reporting of the budget

Climate Change Commission

Coordinate and monitor government climate change policy and response

Provide technical inputs on the integration of NCCAP priorities into each step of the budget process; ensure quality and reliability of the climate budget data; review and monitor progress in the attainment of climate priorities; initiate climate policy dialogue with NGAs; and lead capacity building on climate budgeting at the national level

Department of Interior and Local Government

Improve performance of local governments in governance, administration, social and economic development, and environmental management

Provide capacity building programs for LGUs to institutionalize and sustain CCET and monitor compliance by LGUs

National Government Agencies

Incorporate climate response in planning; Tag, track, and report climate expenditure and monitor and report climate response

Local Government Units Identify, tag, and track climate expenditure in the Annual Investment Program, and report climate response


Recognizing that some of the outlined reforms can only be accomplished over the medium- to

longer- term, DBM and CCC focus on generating concrete products quickly and to

simultaneously engage across the steps of the budget and planning cycles in real time,

building upon on going existing reform efforts across government.



Decision Flowchart for Tagging CC Expenditures 1.Based on the DBM/CCC JMC, national

government agencies determine whether the objectives and outcomes of their programs or projects are climate change adaptation or mitigation measures.

2.If at least one objective is an adaptation or mitigation measure, national government agencies consider the entire program or project budget as a climate change expenditure. If only specific components are adaptation or mitigation measures, agencies consider only the budget for those specific components as climate change expenditures.

3.National government agencies tag their climate change expenditure using a standardized climate change typology, submit the list of CC expenditures to CCC for review and to secure approved Quality Assurance and Review (QAR) Forms, submit the accomplished BP Form 201-F with the QAR as annex to the DBM.

CC expenditure tagging put the PH in a strong position to better understand, assess, and adjust how much of its

climate budget is allocated to what and to whom on which areas, in alignment with

the NCCAP’s priorities.


15

Equipped with more robust data and analysis, NGAs, together with DBM and CCC, have engaged in substantive discussions on how to strengthen and improve the prioritization of their climate responses.

• Continuous capacity building activities are held jointly by theDBM and CCC to to re-orient government entities on climatebudgeting. These sessions include discussions on the amendedJMC, clarify the responsibilities of national government agenciesas mandated in the National Climate Change Action Plan(NCCAP), and discuss the importance of the QAR Form as a toolin assessing climate change-tagged programs

• Many NGAs also begin deliberations on their respective budgetrequest priorities prior to the issuance of the national budget callby the DBM. The increased reviews of and deliberations on theseprograms have led to increases in proposed climate response bysome NGAs.


Overall, the experience in the Philippines has shown the feasibility and relevance of the climate budgeting system for informing national and local

governments’ climate responses.

Implementation of climate budgeting over the six years has enhanced government capacity to implement the system, including conducting

analyses that inform decisions on climate expenditure allocation. This process has begun to

transform climate policy and programming decisions at the NGA, inter-agency, LGU and

national oversight agency levels.


RESULTS OF THE FY2020 CLIMATE CHANGE

EXPENDITURE TAGGING EXERCISE

18

FY 2020 CLIMATE EXPENDITURES, AS PERCENT OF TOTAL BUDGET(IN THOUSAND PESOS)

19

3,450,957,271 3,879,226,211

210,691,038 220,773,789

2019 2020

Non-CCE

CCE2020 CCE (NEP Levels)

• 4.8% than the 2019GAA level; and,

• 5.4% of the total FY2020 budget is forclimate-relatedexpenditures, slightlylower from 5.8% sharein FY 2019.

FY 2020 CLIMATE EXPENDITURES, BY PILLAR(IN THOUSAND PESOS)

20

2020 CCE (NEP Levels)• 96.1% of the

climate changeexpenditurestagged is foradaptationresponse.

205,188,037 212,117,404

5,503,001 8,656,385

2019 2020

Adaptation

Mitigation

Chart2

Adaptation

20192020205188037212117404Mitigation

2019202055030018656385Total20192020210691038220773789

By Dept

Department/Special Purpose Fund20162017201820192020

CC ExpenditureCC ExpenditureCC ExpenditureCC ExpenditureCC Expenditure

AdaptationMitigationTotalAdaptationMitigationTotalAdaptationMitigationTotalAdaptationMitigationTotalAdaptationMitigationTotalData set for graphs

%

DEPARTMENTS126,870,7338,795,767135,666,500181,136,7798,877,477190,014,256247,298,1336,567,905253,866,038197,510,1114,001,450201,511,561203,391,5526,489,246209,880,7982017201820192020201720182019

Department of Agrarian Reform15,000-15,000302,095-302,095429,611-429,611366,000-366,000298,423-298,423Adaptation187,510,690254,902,787205,188,037212,117,40494.7%96.9%97.4%

Department of Agriculture17,164,762331,71817,496,48011,686,780392,30812,079,08813,474,47946,37013,520,84923,118,21038,18223,156,39218,857,36362,27118,919,634Mitigation10,440,8598,286,7345,503,0018,656,3855.3%3.1%2.6%

Department of Energy-62,13962,139-319,563319,563-222,733222,733-224,998224,998-322,201322,201Total197,951,549263,189,521210,691,038220,773,789

Department of Environment and Natural Resources3,484,4248,319,41011,803,8345,579,3758,086,83113,666,2065,903,2425,822,93511,726,1775,076,5253,279,2028,355,7276,367,6835,718,57612,086,259

Department of Finance------269,257-269,257------

Department of Foreign Affairs1,448-1,4481,8004,9926,7922,512-2,5122,062-2,0627,732-7,732

Department of Health------6,465-6,465

Department of Information and Communications Technology ---1,000-1,000217,144-217,144211,457-211,45717,550-17,550Top Departments20202019%2018

Department of the Interior and Local Government76,000-76,00076,767-76,76776,000-76,00077,200-77,20077,200-77,200DPWH174,700,07079.1%164,942,14478.3%161,100,17261.2%

Department of Labor and Employment 1,083,902-1,083,902499,416-499,4161,012,065-1,012,065693,835-693,835789,444-789,444DA18,919,6348.6%23,156,39211.0%13,520,8495.1%

Department of National Defense334,86726,898361,765537,845-537,845289,088-289,088549,963-549,963354,067-354,067DENR12,086,2595.5%8,355,7274.0%11,726,1774.5%

Department of Public Works and Highways101,701,697-101,701,697161,100,172-161,100,172223,732,658-223,732,658164,942,144-164,942,144174,700,070-174,700,070BSGCs6,844,1693.1%5,860,4332.8%6,009,4132.3%

Department of Science and Technology 2,907,94349,0072,956,9501,223,67654,0001,277,6761,518,066446,1441,964,2101,425,850420,9261,846,7761,328,189363,2331,691,422ALGUs4,048,8221.8%3,319,0441.6%3,314,0701.3%

Department of Tourism-1,5001,500-8008002922921,500-1,50026,993-26,99398.1%97.6%74.3%

Department of Trade and Industry---954,258-954,258502,459-502,459

National Economic and Development Authority5,988-5,9882,580-2,5805,4925,4921,726-1,7261,726-1,726

Presidential Communications Operations Office1,041-1,0411,041-1,0411,041-1,041

Other Executive Offices 2/94,7025,09599,797125,27318,983144,256367,18629,723396,90988,34038,142126,48255,14722,96578,112

SPECIAL PURPOSE FUNDS1,386,13211,9081,398,0406,373,9111,563,3827,937,2937,604,6541,718,8299,323,4837,677,9261,501,5519,179,4778,725,8522,167,13910,892,991

Allocations to Local Government Units 3/1,386,13211,9081,398,040772,2621,563,3822,335,6441,595,2411,718,8293,314,0701,817,4931,501,5513,319,0441,881,6832,167,1394,048,822

Budgetary Support to Government Corporations 4/---5,601,649-5,601,6496,009,413-6,009,4135,860,433-5,860,4336,844,169-6,844,169

TOTAL128,256,8658,807,675137,064,540187,510,69010,440,859197,951,549254,902,7878,286,734263,189,521205,188,0375,503,001210,691,038212,117,4048,656,385220,773,789

1/Net of the CC expenditures of State Universities and Colleges (SUCs)

2/The FY 2016 CC expenditures of the Information and Communications Technology Office were lodged under the Department of Science and Technology, as one of its attached agencies at that time, while the corresponding FY 2017-2018 CC expenditures were reported under the newly-created Department of Information and Communications Technology

2/The CC expenditures of the Technical Education and Skills Development Authority were lodged under the Department of Labor and Employment in FY 2016, and under Other Executive Offices in FY 2017-2018

4/The CC expenditures of the National Youth Commission were lodged under the Department of Social Welfare and Development in FY 2016, and under Other Executive Offices in FY 2017-2018

2/ Pertaining to the CC expenditures of the Climate Change Commission, the Pasig River Rehabilitation Commission, the National Youth Commission, and the Technical Education and Skills Development Authority

3/ Representing the CC expenditures of the Metro Manila Development Authority2016201720182019

4/ Referring to the CC expenditures of the National Dairy Authority, the Philippine Crop Insurance Corporation, the Philippine Fisheries Development Authority, the Philippine Rice Research Institute, the Local Water Utilities Administration, the Cultural Center of the Philippines, the Natinoal Housing Authority and the National Irrigation Administration

2019

Non-CC expenditures2,545,750,3153,117,373,0833,503,810,4793,546,308,962

CC expenditures137,064,540197,951,549263,189,521210,691,038

Total Budget2,682,814,8553,315,324,6323,767,000,0003,757,000,000

5.1%6.0%7.0%5.5%

As percent of total BudgetAdaptation vs Mitigation

By Department

Non-CC expenditures

CC expenditures

DPWHDADENRBSGCsALGUs174700070189196341208625968441694048822

Adaptation

20192020205188037212117404Mitigation

2019202055030018656385Total20192020210691038220773789

by NCCAP

NCCAP Strategic Priorities2016201720182019

AdaptationMitigationTotalAdaptationMitigationTotalAdaptationMitigationTotalAdaptationMitigationTotal

Amount%Amount%Amount%Amount %Arranged

Food Security17,166,210331,71817,497,92813%16,161,606520,38416,681,9908%19,290,5771,168,72920,459,3067%17,243,332950,60618,193,9388%2,017Particulars2019%

Water Sufficiency76,641,226- 076,641,22656%123,082,106123,082,10662%179,727,505179,727,50565%160,428,332160,428,33266%1Water Sufficiency160,428,33266%

Ecosystem and Environmental Stability3,002,0168,323,90811,325,9248%4,408,2887,118,02911,526,3176%5,821,0235,215,67111,036,6944%4,031,9025,412,4379,444,3394%2Sustainable Energy43,829,12718%

Human Security343,734- 0343,7340%2,635,7672,635,7671%7,513,4367,513,4363%6,694,0326,694,0323%3Food Security18,193,9388%

Climate Smart Industries and Services2,274,09123,0002,297,0912%872,8021,848,9342,721,7361%1,644,7461,876,9313,521,6771%1,093,9961,813,7562,907,7521%4Ecosystem and Environmental Stability9,444,3394%

Sustainable Energy25,935,976120,45426,056,43019%39,076,597946,03740,022,63420%52,124,9121,493,63953,618,55119%43,175,418653,70943,829,12718%7Human Security6,694,0323%

Knowledge and Capacity Development2,850,8623,5002,854,3622%1,256,4691,256,4691%1,663,91265,0001,728,9121%922,81558,000980,8150%6Climate Smart Industries and Services2,907,7521%

Cross-Cutting47,7145,09552,8090%17,0557,47524,5300%35,68124,89160,5720%28,95156,04985,0000%5Knowledge and Capacity Development980,8150%

8Cross-Cutting85,0000%

Total128,261,8298,807,675137,069,504100%187,510,69010,440,859197,951,549100%267,821,7929,844,861277,666,653100%233,618,7788,944,557242,563,335100%TOTAL242,563,335100%

56%62%

19%20%

Total Budget2,682,814,8553,350,000,0003,767,000,000

[CELLRANGE], [値]

19%, [値]10%, [値][CELLRANGE], [値]

[CELLRANGE], [値]

[CELLRANGE], [値]

[CELLRANGE], [値]

[CELLRANGE], [値]

Water SufficiencySustainable EnergyFood SecurityEcosystem and Environmental StabilityHuman SecurityClimate Smart Industries and ServicesKnowledge and Capacity Development Cross-Cutting 16042833243829127181939389444339669403229077529808158500066%18%8%4%3%1%0%0%

FY 2020 CLIMATE EXPENDITURES, TOP DEPARTMENTS(IN THOUSAND PESOS)

174,700,070

18,919,634 12,086,259 6,844,169 4,048,822

DPWH DA DENR BSGCs ALGUs

2020 CCE (NEP Levels)• 98% of the climate

changeexpenditurestagged can betraced to three (3)departments andtwo (2) SpecialPurpose Funds(SPFs).

Chart1


By Dept




%

DEPARTMENTS126,870,7338,795,767135,666,500181,136,7798,877,477190,014,256247,298,1336,567,905253,866,038197,510,1114,001,450201,511,561203,391,5526,489,246209,880,7982017201820192020201720182019

Department of Agrarian Reform15,000-15,000302,095-302,095429,611-429,611366,000-366,000298,423-298,423Adaptation187,510,690254,902,787205,188,037212,117,40494.7%96.9%97.4%

Department of Agriculture17,164,762331,71817,496,48011,686,780392,30812,079,08813,474,47946,37013,520,84923,118,21038,18223,156,39218,857,36362,27118,919,634Mitigation10,440,8598,286,7345,503,0018,656,3855.3%3.1%2.6%



Department of Finance------269,257-269,257------



Department of Information and Communications Technology ---1,000-1,000217,144-217,144211,457-211,45717,550-17,550Top Departments20202019%2018














TOTAL128,256,8658,807,675137,064,540187,510,69010,440,859197,951,549254,902,7878,286,734263,189,521205,188,0375,503,001210,691,038212,117,4048,656,385220,773,789








2019

Non-CC expenditures2,545,750,3153,117,373,0833,503,810,4793,546,308,962

CC expenditures137,064,540197,951,549263,189,521210,691,038

Total Budget2,682,814,8553,315,324,6323,767,000,0003,757,000,000

5.1%6.0%7.0%5.5%


By Department

Non-CC expenditures

CC expenditures


Adaptation

20192020205188037212117404Mitigation

2019202055030018656385Total20192020210691038220773789

by NCCAP


AdaptationMitigationTotalAdaptationMitigationTotalAdaptationMitigationTotalAdaptationMitigationTotal

Amount%Amount%Amount%Amount %Arranged

Food Security17,166,210331,71817,497,92813%16,161,606520,38416,681,9908%19,290,5771,168,72920,459,3067%17,243,332950,60618,193,9388%2,017Particulars2019%

Water Sufficiency76,641,226- 076,641,22656%123,082,106123,082,10662%179,727,505179,727,50565%160,428,332160,428,33266%1Water Sufficiency160,428,33266%

Ecosystem and Environmental Stability3,002,0168,323,90811,325,9248%4,408,2887,118,02911,526,3176%5,821,0235,215,67111,036,6944%4,031,9025,412,4379,444,3394%2Sustainable Energy43,829,12718%

Human Security343,734- 0343,7340%2,635,7672,635,7671%7,513,4367,513,4363%6,694,0326,694,0323%3Food Security18,193,9388%

Climate Smart Industries and Services2,274,09123,0002,297,0912%872,8021,848,9342,721,7361%1,644,7461,876,9313,521,6771%1,093,9961,813,7562,907,7521%4Ecosystem and Environmental Stability9,444,3394%

Sustainable Energy25,935,976120,45426,056,43019%39,076,597946,03740,022,63420%52,124,9121,493,63953,618,55119%43,175,418653,70943,829,12718%7Human Security6,694,0323%

Knowledge and Capacity Development2,850,8623,5002,854,3622%1,256,4691,256,4691%1,663,91265,0001,728,9121%922,81558,000980,8150%6Climate Smart Industries and Services2,907,7521%

Cross-Cutting47,7145,09552,8090%17,0557,47524,5300%35,68124,89160,5720%28,95156,04985,0000%5Knowledge and Capacity Development980,8150%

8Cross-Cutting85,0000%

Total128,261,8298,807,675137,069,504100%187,510,69010,440,859197,951,549100%267,821,7929,844,861277,666,653100%233,618,7788,944,557242,563,335100%TOTAL242,563,335100%

56%62%

19%20%

Total Budget2,682,814,8553,350,000,0003,767,000,000

[CELLRANGE], [値]

19%, [値]10%, [値][CELLRANGE], [値]

[CELLRANGE], [値]

[CELLRANGE], [値]

[CELLRANGE], [値]

[CELLRANGE], [値]

Water SufficiencySustainable EnergyFood SecurityEcosystem and Environmental StabilityHuman SecurityClimate Smart Industries and ServicesKnowledge and Capacity Development Cross-Cutting 16042833243829127181939389444339669403229077529808158500066%18%8%4%3%1%0%0%

FY 2020 CLIMATE EXPENDITURES, BY NCCAP STRATEGIC PRIORITIES(IN THOUSAND PESOS)

22

125,796,292

45,444,914

25,442,272

10,631,146

8,333,339

3,699,588

1,380,158

46,080

Water Sufficiency

Sustainable Energy

Food Security

Ecosystem and EnvironmentalStability

Human Security

Climate Smart Industries andServices

Knowledge and CapacityDevelopment

Cross-Cutting

2020 CCE (NEP Levels)

• 57% of the climatechange expenditurestagged is for watersufficiency projects.

• The share of projectsper strategic prioritylargely remain thesame as FY 2019, withwater sufficiencyaccounting for most,followed bySustainable Energy.

Chart3

Water SufficiencySustainable EnergyFood SecurityEcosystem and Environmental StabilityHuman SecurityClimate Smart Industries and ServicesKnowledge and Capacity Development Cross-Cutting 12579629245444914254422721063114683333393699588138015846080

[CELLRANGE], [値]

19%, [値]10%, [値][CELLRANGE], [値]

[CELLRANGE], [値]

[CELLRANGE], [値]

[CELLRANGE], [値]

[CELLRANGE], [値]

Water SufficiencySustainable EnergyFood SecurityEcosystem and Environmental StabilityHuman SecurityClimate Smart Industries and ServicesKnowledge and Capacity Development Cross-Cutting 127030457358041882934558969821197708838263607611274035636860%17%14%3%4%1%1%0%Water SufficiencySustainable EnergyFood SecurityEcosystem and Environmental StabilityHuman SecurityClimate Smart Industries and ServicesKnowledge and Capacity Development Cross-Cutting 0.602922925463967750.169936929163546110.139282568820036873.313913617910981E-23.6588352656936454E-21.2511571564804765E-25.3509774820132599E-32.6753866958498728E-4

By Dept




%

DEPARTMENTS126,870,7338,795,767135,666,500181,136,7798,877,477190,014,256247,298,1336,567,905253,866,038197,510,1114,001,450201,511,561203,391,5526,489,246209,880,79820172018201920202017201820192020

Department of Agrarian Reform15,000-15,000302,095-302,095429,611-429,611366,000-366,000298,423-298,423Adaptation187,510,690254,902,787205,188,037212,117,40494.7%96.9%97.4%96.1%

Department of Agriculture17,164,762331,71817,496,48011,686,780392,30812,079,08813,474,47946,37013,520,84923,118,21038,18223,156,39218,857,36362,27118,919,634Mitigation10,440,8598,286,7345,503,0018,656,3855.3%3.1%2.6%3.9%



Department of Finance------269,257-269,257------Total 2019 vs 20204.8%



Department of Information and Communications Technology ---1,000-1,000217,144-217,144211,457-211,45717,550-17,550Top Departments2020%2019%2018














TOTAL128,256,8658,807,675137,064,540187,510,69010,440,859197,951,549254,902,7878,286,734263,189,521205,188,0375,503,001210,691,038212,117,4048,656,385220,773,789








20192020

Non-CC expenditures2,545,750,3153,117,373,0833,268,575,7723,450,957,2713,879,226,211

CC expenditures137,064,540197,951,549263,189,521210,691,038220,773,789

Total Budget2,682,814,8553,315,324,6323,531,765,2933,661,648,3094,100,000,000

5.1%6.0%7.5%5.8%5.4%


By Department

Non-CC expenditures 2,545,750,315 3,117,373,083 3,268,575,772

2019202034509572713879226211CC expenditures 137,064,540 197,951,549 263,189,521

20192020210691038220773789Total Budget 2,682,814,855 3,315,324,632 3,531,765,293

2019202036616483094100000000


Adaptation

20192020205188037212117404Mitigation

2019202055030018656385Total20192020210691038220773789

by NCCAP


AdaptationMitigationTotalAdaptationMitigationTotalAdaptationMitigationTotalAdaptationMitigationTotalAdaptationMitigationTotal

Amount%Amount%Amount%Amount %Amount%Arranged

Food Security17,166,210331,71817,497,92813%16,161,606520,38416,681,9908%19,392,019289,37619,681,3957%28,979,202366,38729,345,58914%25,087,178355,09425,442,27212%2,017Particulars2019%2020%

Water Sufficiency76,641,226- 076,641,22656%123,082,106123,082,10662%172,452,363- 0172,452,36366%127,030,457- 0127,030,45760%125,796,292- 0125,796,29257%1Water Sufficiency127,030,45760%125,796,292

Ecosystem and Environmental Stability3,002,0168,323,90811,325,9248%4,408,2887,118,02911,526,3176%4,944,6685,066,66610,011,3344%4,379,6822,602,4376,982,1193%5,478,7095,152,43710,631,1465%2Sustainable Energy35,804,18817%45,444,914

Human Security343,734- 0343,7340%2,635,7672,635,7671%6,929,591- 06,929,5913%7,708,838- 07,708,8384%8,333,339- 08,333,3394%3Food Security29,345,58914%25,442,272

Climate Smart Industries and Services2,274,09123,0002,297,0912%872,8021,848,9342,721,7361%1,558,6261,760,1873,318,8131%1,025,3851,610,6912,636,0761%1,143,4762,556,1123,699,5882%4Ecosystem and Environmental Stability6,982,1193%10,631,146

Sustainable Energy25,935,976120,45426,056,43019%39,076,597946,03740,022,63420%48,043,137937,64448,980,78119%35,011,565792,62335,804,18817%44,945,547499,36745,444,91421%7Human Security7,708,8384%8,333,339

Knowledge and Capacity Development2,850,8623,5002,854,3622%1,256,4691,256,4691%1,243,311203,1381,446,4491%1,011,037116,3661,127,4031%1,309,74870,4101,380,1581%6Climate Smart Industries and Services2,636,0761%3,699,588

Cross-Cutting47,7145,09552,8090%17,0557,47524,5300%339,07229,723368,7950%41,87114,49756,3680%23,11522,96546,0800%5Knowledge and Capacity Development1,127,4031%1,380,158

8Cross-Cutting56,3680%46,080

Total128,261,8298,807,675137,069,504100%187,510,69010,440,859197,951,549100%254,902,7878,286,734263,189,521100%205,188,0375,503,001210,691,038100%212,117,4048,656,385220,773,789100%TOTAL210,691,038100%

56%62%

19%20%

Total Budget2,682,814,8553,350,000,0003,767,000,000

Water SufficiencySustainable EnergyFood SecurityEcosystem and Environmental StabilityHuman SecurityClimate Smart Industries and ServicesKnowledge and Capacity Development Cross-Cutting 12579629245444914254422721063114683333393699588138015846080

[CELLRANGE], [値]

19%, [値]10%, [値][CELLRANGE], [値]

[CELLRANGE], [値]

[CELLRANGE], [値]

[CELLRANGE], [値]

[CELLRANGE], [値]

Water SufficiencySustainable EnergyFood SecurityEcosystem and Environmental StabilityHuman SecurityClimate Smart Industries and ServicesKnowledge and Capacity Development Cross-Cutting 127030457358041882934558969821197708838263607611274035636860%17%14%3%4%1%1%0%Water SufficiencySustainable EnergyFood SecurityEcosystem and Environmental StabilityHuman SecurityClimate Smart Industries and ServicesKnowledge and Capacity Development Cross-Cutting 0.602922925463967750.169936929163546110.139282568820036873.313913617910981E-23.6588352656936454E-21.2511571564804765E-25.3509774820132599E-32.6753866958498728E-4

24


The DBM and CCC lead the implementation and institutionalization of the climate budgeting system within and across national and local government units.

Government Leadership: Leadership at the highest levels of government, along with a vision toact, was the primary factor in catalyzing systematic effort and sustaining the leadership at theoversight level to strengthen the public section climate response.

Design Flexibility: A flexible design based on real-time application and the incorporation offeedback loops was the cornerstone for rapid progress in establishing a climate budgetingsystem.

Capacity Building and Training: Building the capacity of NGAs, LGUs, and oversight agencieswas a critical step in ensuring that all stakeholders remain engaged in the development andimplementation of the climate budgeting system.

Engagement: Engaging all stakeholders throughout the implementation was a key factor insustaining the momentum.

Technical Assistance and Targeted Advisory Services: The WB technical assistance was critical indefining the overall scope and the evolution of the incremental tasks under a flexible design.

• Climate budgeting is an important additional foundation of the climate change response of the Philippines. Its continued implementation is recognized in the Philippines’ (intended) Nationally Determined Contribution as a means of implementation for the Philippines to enhance climate resilience and promote mitigation efforts. It puts the Philippines in a strong position to leverage financing for its CC response, improve investment programming and overall incentive frameworks (beyond public expenditures)

• Enhancing convergence across sectors and between the national and local government levels of financing is a top priority. There is recognition that a shift is needed to go beyond sector-based mainstreaming as the primary entry point for action

• While strengthening the Philippines’ disaster response remains a key need, investing through the budget at scale, and more effectively, in climate resilience and adaptation measures is a critical priority which provides a cost-effective approach towards alleviating the impacts of climate hazards on people, assets, livelihoods and the national economy

• Doing so will not only require the continued strengthening of the climate budgeting framework, but also enhanced planning, implementation, and operational frameworks to ensure that the appropriate technical and investment options are being delivered on-the-ground in the most cost-effective manner

Emerging message on climate budgeting


When fully implemented, the climate budget system will enable a continuous feedback and learning process, whereby

gaps can be identified and budget allocation readjusted to effectively

respond to climate challenges.


THE RISK RESILIENCY PROGRAM

The CCAM-DRR Cabinet Cluster formulated the Risk Resiliency Program (RRP) as a framework program…….to assist the GOP onstrengthening the resiliency ofnatural ecosystems and theadaptive capacity ofvulnerable communities toshort and long term risks inkey Philippine Landscape.

RISK RESILIENCY PROGRAM EXPENDITURES, FY 2016 – 2020(IN THOUSAND PESOS)

88,735,087

108,898,909

148,587,222

114,535,694 121,612,497

2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

2020 RRP (NEP Level)• RRP has

consistently seenan increase in itsbudget, with theexception of FY2019 due to theshift to cash-basedappropriations.

Chart1

RRP

2016201720182019202088735087108898909148587222114535694121612497

Sheet1

RRP Expenditure Trend

20162017201820192020

RRP88,735,087108,898,909148,587,222114,535,694121,612,497

RRP

2016201720182019202088735087108898909148587222114535694121612497

OTHER POLICY AND BUDGETARY INSTRUMENTS

• Provisions for contingencies within the National Budget toprovide for the relief, rehabilitation and reconstruction ofcommunities and structures affected by disasters, i.e., NationalDisaster Risk Reduction and Management Fund and the QuickResponse Fund

•Inclusion of general provisions (e.g., Sections 27, 37-40) on climate resilience in the General Appropriations Act

•Use of Disaster Risk Financing Instruments (DRFI)e.g. Catastrophe Deferred Drawdown Option (CAT-DDO)

MAINSTREAMING CLIMATE CHANGE IN BUDGET AND

INVESTMENT PROGRAMMING

Debt Management Facility Stakeholders’ Forum

May 22-23, 2017

PHILIPPINES’

Mainstreaming Climate Change in Budget and Investment Programming スライド番号 2Developing a Climate Budgeting Systemスライド番号 4Climate budget SYSTEMスライド番号 6スライド番号 7Government policies to implement and institutionalize climate budgetingスライド番号 9Climate budget SYSTEMスライド番号 11スライド番号 12スライド番号 13スライド番号 14スライド番号 15スライド番号 16Climate budget SYSTEMResults of the FY2020 Climate Change Expenditure Tagging ExerciseFY 2020 CLIMATE EXPENDITURES, AS PERCENT OF TOTAL BUDGET�(In thousand PESOS)FY 2020 CLIMATE EXPENDITURES, BY PILLAR�(In thousand PESOS)FY 2020 CLIMATE EXPENDITURES, TOP DEPARTMENTS�(In thousand PESOS)�FY 2020 CLIMATE EXPENDITURES, by NCCAP Strategic Priorities�(IN THOUSAND PESOS)Climate budget SYSTEMスライド番号 24スライド番号 25スライド番号 26THE RISK RESILIENCY PROGRAMスライド番号 28RISK RESILIENCY PROGRAM EXPENDITURES, �FY 2016 – 2020�(IN THOUSAND PESOS)OTHER POLICY AND BUDGETARY INSTRUMENTSMainstreaming Climate Change in Budget and Investment Programming

philippines’ · dpwh da denr bsgcs algus: 2020 cce (nep levels) • 98% of the climate change...

Documents