philippine navy islands of good governance 2015 report

7/23/2019 Philippine Navy Islands of Good Governance 2015 Report

1/103


2/103

NAVY 2020: STRONG AND CREDIBLE


3/103
http://[email protected]/http://www.navy.mil.ph/


4/103



5/103


6/103



7/103



8/103


9/103

Securing the Seas, Protecting our Future The PN as an Island of Good Govern


10/103



11/103



12/103


Students of the Naval Reserve Officer Training Corps joining Navyoperations after Typhoon Yolanda in 2013.


13/103



14/103



15/103



16/103



17/103



18/103

Securing the Seas, Protecting our Future The PN as an Island of Good Governance

PERSPECTIVE OBJECTIVE MEASURE2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

INITIATIVEST A T A T A T A T A

PERSONNEL

1. Highly Competent

& Motivated

Professionals (N1)

A. Morale and

Welfare Discipline

(TNIG)

86% 93.8

%

86% 93.2

7

86% 93.90 86% 94.2% 86% 91.26

%

1. Competency-Based PN

Personnel/Human Resource

Management System (N1)

B. Personnel

Readiness Profile

(N1)

65% 74.13

%

70% 75.9

3%

73% 83.42

%

85% 80.85% 85% 71.89

%

2. PN Education & Training System (N8)

C. TrainingReadiness (N8)

70% 72.66%

75% 76.62%

80% 83.98%

85% 97% 85% 98.44%

ORGANIZATION 2. Sound &

Appropriate Maritime

Doctrines (N8)

A. % of Existing

Doctrines Reviewed

(NDO) Started in 2012

20% 9% 40% 55% 50% 70% 3. Establish PN Doctrines Management

System (NDO)

B. % of Existing

Doctrines Published


20% 6% 40% 30% 50% 44%

C. % of New

Doctrine Concepts

Developed (NDO) Started in 2012

20% 5% 40% 27% 50% 30%

D. % of NewDoctrines Published


20% 0% 40% 18% 50% 13%

3. Responsive Naval

Reservists Program

(N9)

A. Reservists TO

Percentage Fill-up

(N9)

11.8

%

57% 30% 83% 50% 52% 80% 84% 80% 84% 4. Institute a Sustainable PN Reservists

System (N9)

B. Reservists

Training Readiness

Profile (N9)

11.8

%

72% 30% 45% 100% 50% 100% 90% 100% 90%

FLAG OFFICER IN COMMAND, PHILIPPINE NAVY

BALANCED SCORECARD

2010-2014


19/103


4. Dynamic &

Responsive Naval

Organization (N3)

A. Force Structure

Completion Rate

(N3)

20% 20% 50% 50% 60% 50% 60% 60% 60% 60% 5. Responsive PN Force Structure &

Reliable Manpower Management System

(N5)

B. Number of PN

Units with ISO

Certification (NSO) Starte

d in

2011

1 1 3 3 6 6 10 10 6. Pursue ISO-Certified PN Systems

(NSO)

RESOURCES 5. Adequate Financial

Resources (NMFO)

B. Amount

Generated from

PNTR (NMFO)

45M 45.5M 50M 55.6

M

55M 58.1M 60M 65.6M 60M 43M 7. A Sustainable Non-Traditional

Resource Generating System for PN

(NMFO/NRMO)

B. COA Audit

Opinion (TNIA)

Q Q Q Q Q A Replaced with new measure

6. Balance Financial

Programs (NRMO)

% Of The Budget

Allocation Intended

For The Key Result

Areas Of The

President's Social

Contract

95% 97.04

%

95% 97.3

0%

95% 96.99

%

95% 96.99% 95% 96.99

%

8. Strengthen PN Fiscal Administration

(NRMO)

% Of The Budget

Allocation Intended

For Unit Final Output Started in 2012

70% 75.40

%

70% 75.99% 70% 75.99

%

CAPABILITY 7. Responsive Naval

Support System (N4)

A. Timely Arrival of

Resources (N4)

100% 100% 100% 100

%

100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 9. Project and Anticipate Accurate

Requirements of Support (N4)

8. Reliable Naval

Facilities (N4)

A. Facility Readiness

(N4)

100% 100% 94.5

9%

100% 97.93

%

100% 94.51% 100% 77.83

%

10. Establishment of Naval Base Support

System (N4)

B. Number of

Completed Bases &

Stations based on

MDP (N4)

1 1 1 0 1 1 5 5 5 5 11. Rational Land Use Plan (PN REMO)


20/103


9.Up To Date Naval

Capability (N5)

A. Defense

Acquisition System

(N4)

20% 20% 20% 30% 20% 10% 20% 15% 20% 16% 12. Acquisition of Defense Equipment for

Capability Upgrade (N4)

B. % Capability

Development

Program

Implemented (N5)

20% 10% 25% 30% 100% 88% 100% 88% 100% 100% 13. Full Utilization of PN Defense

Capability Assessment & Planning

System (N5)

10. Optimal Level of

Operational

Readiness (N3)

A. OPREVAL Rating

(N3)

66% 78.56

%

68% 77.0

1%

70% 79.97

%

73% 81.81% 73% 83.49

%

14. Improve Operational Readiness

Program Management (N3)

11. Secured Maritime

Environment (N3)

A. Naval Operations

Index (N3)

For completion in 2014

15. Efficient Data Collection & Reporting

System on Naval Operations (N3)

ACCOMPLISHM

ENT

12. Highly Satisfied

Stakeholders (N7)

A. External Public

Satisfaction Rating

(N7)

16. Implement a Dynamic Strategic

Communications Plan (N7)

B. Average Internal

Satisfaction Rating

(N1)


21/103


I.

80%

82%

84%

86%

88%

90%

92%

94%

96%

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

Target

Actual


22/103



23/103



24/103



25/103


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

Target

Actual


26/103


0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

120%

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

Target

Actual


27/103



28/103


II.

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

2011 2012 2013 2014

Target

Actual


29/103



30/103


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

2012 2013 2014

Target

Actual


31/103


-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

III.


32/103


92%

93%

94%

95%

96%

97%

98%

99%

100%

101%

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

Target

Actual


33/103


IV.

67%

68%

69%

70%

71%

72%

73%

74%

75%

76%

77%

2012 2013 2014

Target

Actual


34/103


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

Target

Actual

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

120%

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

Target

Actual


35/103



36/103



37/103


PERSPECTIVES STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES MEASURES2015

INITIATIVES1stQtr 2ndQtr Target

PERSONNEL 1. Develop Highly Competent& Motivated Professionals(N1)

A. Personnel Readiness Rating (N1) 62% 75% 1. Sustain the PN Educationand Training Strategy (N8)B. % of Personnel with at Very

Satisfactory PER Rating (N1)99.6% 100%

C. Morale and Discipline SurveyRating (TNIG)

95.01% 95% 2. Institutionalize the HumanCapital Strategy (N1)

ORGANIZATION 2.Develop Sound &

Appropriate MaritimeDoctrines (N8)

A. No. of priority Keystone doctrines

developed (N8)

3 3 5 3. Establish PN Doctrines

Development Strategy (N8)B. No. of support doctrines andadministrative manuals developed (N8)

3 3 7

C. % of promulgated doctrines/manualstested and evaluated (N8)

63.64% 81.82% 70%

3. Achieve Responsive NavalReservists Program (N9)

A. No. of Mission Capable ReserveUnits (N9) 2

4. Institute a Sustainable PNReserve Force DevelopmentStrategy (N9)

4. Adopt Dynamic &Responsive NavalOrganization (N3)

A. %. of Initiatives IAW theReorganization Plan Compliant to AADS(N3)

12% 12% 33%5. Build a Responsive NavalForce Structure (N3)

B. No. of PN Units with ISO CertifiedProcesses (NSO)

14 14 14 6. Pursue ISO-CertifiedProcesses (NSO)

C. Percentage of ISO processescascaded to PN Subordinate Units

(NSO)

TBD

RESOURCES5. Attain Adequate FinancialResources (NRMO)

A. Total Estimated Monetary Value ofMission Essential PAPs Contracted byPN with external s takeholders (NRMO) 12.5M 30M 909M

7. Pursue Opportunities forother sources of funds (NRMO)

6. Ensure Balanced F inancialPrograms (NRMO)

A. % of Budget Allocation Intended forUFO Executed (NMFO) 43% 90%

8. Strengthen ResourceManagement System (NRMO)

CAPABILITY7. Achieve a ResponsiveNaval Sustainment System(N4)

A. Mission Critical and MissionEssential Supply Readiness Rating (N4)

TBD9. Develop a PN LogisticsManagement Strategy (N4)B. Mission Critical and Mission

Essential Equipment Readiness Rating(N4)

79% 75%

8. Develop Reliable NavalFacilities (N4)

A. Facility Readiness Rating (N4) 42% 75%

10. Implement the PN BasingStrategy (PN REMO)B. Number of Completed InfrastructureProjects Contributory to Major FinalOutput (TNCE) 25 109 207

9. Develop Responsive NavalCapabilities (N5)

A. Percentage Capability DevelopmentPlan Acquired for Horizon One (N5)

9.5% 9.5% 42%

11. Implement the PNCapability Development Plan(N5)

ACCOMPLISHMENT

10. Optimal Level ofOperational Readiness (N3)

A. OPREVAL Rating (N3) 42% 72.22%12. Improve OperationalReadiness ManagementProgram (N3)

11. Secured MaritimeEnvironment (N2)

A. Increase the number of MSAPlatforms (N2) 21 36 31

13. Enhance Efficient DataCollection & Reporting Systemon Naval Operations (N3)

B. Increase the number ofEngagements in Strategic Level (N3) 7 13 33

C. Number of Patrol in PH Critical Areas(N3) 767 2650

12. Highly SatisfiedStakeholders (N7)

A. PN Units Satisfaction Rating (TNIG) 91.9% 87.50% 14. Implement a DynamicStrategic Communications Plan(N7)

B. Unified Commands SatisfactionRating (TNIG) 92.43% 89.40%

C. Public Awareness Rating (N7) TBD

Legend:

On-going computation

Data available at end of the year

FLAG OFFICER IN COMMAND, PHILIPPINE NAVY

BALANCED SCORECARD

2015


38/103



39/103



40/103


The first objective under the Resource Perspective is to Attain Adequate Financial

Resources. Its measure is the total estimated monetary value of Mission Essential PAPs

Contracted by PN with external stakeholders. These refer to a) Memorandum of

Agreements (MOAs) of the PN with various institutions or organizations which enable the

PN to make use of its services or products such as training, consultancy, shipment etc., b)

PN Trust Receipts c) Donations d) other services with no cost on the part of the PN. These

services or products however have monetary values which the PN is able to maximize

beyond the existing programmed budget.


41/103



42/103



43/103



44/103



45/103



46/103



47/103



48/103



49/103



50/103



51/103



52/103



53/103



54/103

Securing the Seas, Protecting our Future The PN as an Island of Good GovernNAVY 2020: STRONG AND CREDIBLE


55/103



56/103



57/103



58/103



59/103



60/103



61/103



62/103



63/103


64/103



65/103



66/103



67/103



68/103



69/103



70/103



71/103



72/103



73/103



74/103


OFFICEOFNAVAL

STRATEGICSTUDIES2014 -

2015

PHILIPPINE NAVY

Outputs

Policy Reviews and Recommendations


75/103



76/103



77/103



78/103



79/103



80/103



81/103


V. STRATEGY EXECUTION


82/103



83/103



84/103



85/103


2.


86/103



87/103



88/103



89/103



90/103



91/103



92/103



93/103



94/103



95/103



96/103



97/103



98/103



99/103



100/103



101/103



102/103



103/103

philippine navy islands of good governance 2015 report

Documents