PRIORS HALL PARKPhased Extraction of Minerals - Planning Application

January 2021

Arboricultural Statement

Arboricultural Method Statement for Limestone Extraction Proposed Limestone Extraction, Priors Hall, Corby Delta-Simons Project Number 17-1536.26

Environment | Health & Safety | Sustainability

Arboricultural Method Statement for Limestone Extraction Proposed Limestone Extraction, Priors Hall, Corby Presented to Urban and Civic Corby Ltd Issued: January 2021 Delta-Simons Project No. 17-1536.26

Arboricultural Method Statement for Limestone Extraction Proposed Limestone Extraction, Priors Hall, Corby Delta-Simons Project Number 17-1536.26

Environment | Health & Safety | Sustainability

Report Details

Client Urban and Civic Corby Ltd

Report Title Arboricultural Method Statement for Limestone Extraction

Site Address Proposed Limestone Extraction, Priors Hall, Corby

Project No. 17-1536.26

Delta-Simons Contact Peter Morrell (pete.morrell@deltasimons.com)

Quality Assurance Issue No. Status Issue

Date Comments Author Technical Review Authorised

3 Final 8th

January 2021

Peter Morrell Principal

Arboriculturist

Charlotte Sanderson-

Lewis Associate and Ecology Team

Leader

Charlotte Sanderson-

Lewis Associate and Ecology Team

Leader

About us Delta-Simons is a trusted, multidisciplinary environmental consultancy, focused on delivering the best possible project outcomes for customers.

Specialising in Environment, Health & Safety and Sustainability, Delta-Simons provide support and advice within the property development, asset management, corporate and industrial markets. Operating from nine locations - Lincoln, Birmingham, Bristol, Dublin, Leeds, London, Manchester, Newcastle, Norwich and Nottingham - we employ over 100 environmental professionals, bringing experience from across the private consultancy and public sector markets.

Delta-Simons is proud to be a founder member of the Inogen® Environmental Alliance, a global corporation providing multinational organisations with consistent, high quality and cost effective environmental, health, safety, energy and sustainability solutions. Inogen assists multinational clients by resolving liabilities from the past, addressing today's requirements and delivering solutions for the future. With more than 200 offices located on every continent, more than 6,430 staff worldwide, and projects completed in more than 120 countries, Inogen provides a single point of contact for diverse markets as Automotive, Chemical, Consumer Products & Retail, Financial, Food & Beverage, Healthcare, Insurance, Manufacturing, Non Profit Organisations, Oil & Gas, Real Estate, Services Firms, Technology and Transportation, among others.

Arboricultural Method Statement for Limestone Extraction Proposed Limestone Extraction, Priors Hall, Corby Delta-Simons Project Number 17-1536.26

Environment | Health & Safety | Sustainability

Table of Contents

Figures Figure 1 Site Location Map

Figures 2a-c Tree Protection Plan

Drawings Drawing 1 19934-RPS-MI-XX-DR-C-0700-Key Plan DRAFT

Drawing 2 019934-RPS-MI-XX-DR-C-0705-Access Routes DRAFT

Appendices Appendix Aa-b Tree Survey

Appendix B Tree Schedule

Appendix C Tree Protection Barriers

Appendix D CEZ Warning Sign

Appendix E Example of Ground Protection

Appendix F NJUG Volume 4

Appendix G AMS Reporting Form

1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Purpose and Scope of the Method Statement ....................................................................................... 1 1.2 AMS Summary ........................................................................................................................................ 1

2.0 ROOT PROTECTION AREAS .................................................................................................................................... 2 3.0 METHODOLOGY .......................................................................................................................................................... 3

3.1 Sequenced Methods of Construction and Tree Protection .................................................................... 3 3.1.1 Pre-Commencement ...................................................................................................................... 3 3.1.2 Completion of Agreed Tree Works ................................................................................................ 3 3.1.3 Tree Protection Barriers ................................................................................................................. 3 3.1.4 Temporary Ground Protection Method and Specification ............................................................. 4

4.0 COMMUNICATIONS/MONITORING .......................................................................................................................... 5 4.1 Monitoring ............................................................................................................................................... 5

5.0 LIMITATIONS OF THE ARBORICULTURAL METHOD STATEMENT .................................................................. 6

Arboricultural Method Statement for Limestone Extraction Proposed Limestone Extraction, Priors Hall, Corby Delta-Simons Project Number 17-1536.26 Page 1

Environment | Health & Safety | Sustainability

1.0 Introduction 1.1 Purpose and Scope of the Method Statement Delta-Simons Environmental Consultants Limited (“Delta-Simons”) was instructed by Urban and Civic Corby Ltd (the “Client”) to produce an Arboricultural Method Statement (AMS) to British Standard BS5837:2012. This AMS has been prepared for trees and hedgerows within and immediately beyond the boundary of land proposed for limestone extraction within Zone 3 (north) and associated access through Zone 2 at Priors Hall, Corby (hereafter referred to as the “Site”). The Delta-Simons Tree Survey (February 2019, report referenced 17-1536.10) has been used to inform this Statement.

This AMS covers the limestone extraction works within Zone 3 (north) associated access through Zone 2, with the anticipated transportation of extracted material on haul roads that cross the Willow Brook in one location. The Site location is shown in Figure 1.

The purpose of this AMS is to assist with the preservation of trees and hedgerows shown to be retained at, and adjacent to, the Site. Trees can readily be retained and protected during the proposed development by ensuring that the tree protection methods, construction techniques and working practices are adhered to. This document provides this information; principles that are approved and enforced by the Local Planning Authority (LPA), Northamptonshire County Council.

1.2 AMS Summary The following points are explained and qualified in more detail within this Report, and this summary is intended for reference only. Any actions consequent to this summary should be discussed with the Arboriculturalist at Delta-Simons before being undertaken in order to prevent a potential breach of tree protection legislation, whether by planning condition, area planning designation or specific tree preservation order (which may apply to individual trees or groups).

This document will give Site-specific instructions on the methods required to protect the existing tree and hedgerow stock agreed to be retained. These methods are set out in a logical sequence of operations and include:

▲ Pre-extraction works meeting: To review the AMS and ensure all relevant parties are familiar with its content, show the trees and hedgerows concerned and where protection will be required;

▲ Tree protection fencing and exclusion signage: To BS 5837:2012 or other agreed approach if required;

▲ Ground protection: Techniques to avoid compaction, disturbance or contamination of the tree root environment;

▲ General tree care measures and awareness; and

▲ Site monitoring to be undertaken by the Arboriculturalist at agreed intervals through the Site preparation and excavation process.

The British Standard recommendations are made for appropriate barriers to exclude construction from RPA: The RPA for each tree and hedgerow is provided in the Tree Survey Schedule (Appendices A & B).

It should be noted that this is a Site-specific AMS produced solely for the physical protection of those trees and hedgerows identified within the Tree and Hedgerow Survey and is not relevant to any other site or situation. This Report has been compiled from data achieved during a Tree and Hedgerow Survey by Delta-Simons on February 2019, report reference 17-1536.10 and updated following a further survey in October 2020.

Arboricultural Method Statement for Limestone Extraction Proposed Limestone Extraction, Priors Hall, Corby Delta-Simons Project Number 17-1536.26 Page 2

Environment | Health & Safety | Sustainability

2.0 Root Protection Areas As the majority of tree roots are found in the upper metre of soil, development works, including for example even shallow excavation and soil compaction can adversely affect the health of trees in close proximity. Trees differ in their tolerance to root loss or disturbance, according to their age, species and/ or condition. All protection works within this document are in accordance with BS5837:2012 ‘Trees in Relation to Design, Demolition and Construction – Recommendations’

Based on the tree survey data, RPAs have been determined for every retained tree as shown in the Tree Survey (Appendices A & B). The RPAs are designed to protect at least a functional minimum of tree root mass in order to ensure that the trees survive the construction process. The RPA has been used to inform the Construction Exclusion Zone (CEZ), the area to be protected during development by the use of ground protection and specialised construction techniques, outlined below.

From the assessment undertaken, the following trees and hedgerows needs specific consideration in this AMS:

▲ T6, T7 and T8 – These trees border the south-western and north-western extent of Zone 3 allocated for extraction with a canopies and RPA’s that extend into the area (see Figure 2a);

▲ TG11 – This tree group lies parallel to an area allocated for extraction in the north-western extent of Zone 3 with an RPA that extends into the area (see Figure 2a); and

▲ TG40 – This tree group extends in to an area allocated for extraction in the south-western extent of Zone 3 with an RPA that extends into the area (see Figure 2a).

Arboricultural Method Statement for Limestone Extraction Proposed Limestone Extraction, Priors Hall, Corby Delta-Simons Project Number 17-1536.26 Page 3

Environment | Health & Safety | Sustainability

3.0 Methodology The following sequences are governed by operational constraints and subject to change. The Site Arboriculturalist must be noted of any changes to this schedule.

3.1 Sequenced Methods of Construction and Tree Protection Pre-Development Stage

3.1.1 Pre-Commencement An on-Site meeting will be held if required, with all relevant parties; including the developer, Site Arboriculturalist, Architect and LPA representative. The purpose of this meeting is to record Site features including tree condition, to agree tree works (detailed below), to reaffirm the permanent, and any temporary, accesses, location of Site storage, the location of ground protection barriers and the timing of Site operations.

3.1.2 Completion of Agreed Tree Works All tree work is to conform to BS3998:2010 ‘Tree Work’ and to current arboricultural best practice. Tree works are to be undertaken by a professional and specialist arboricultural contractor, who carries the appropriate experience and insurance cover and following formal approval from the LPA.

No specific tree works are proposed. However, crown lifting to 2.5 m maybe required prior to the installation of tree protection fencing once the fenceline has been marked out.

3.1.3 Tree Protection Barriers Tree protection barriers will be erected in order to exclude the CEZ from significant construction activity. All excavation work and storage will be undertaken from outside of any RPA. It is the responsibility of everyone engaged in the excavation and storage process to respect the tree protection measures and observe the necessary precautions within and adjacent to them.

Inside the exclusion area of the development, the following shall apply:

▲ No mechanical excavation without approval from the LPA;

▲ No excavation by any other means without Arboricultural Site supervision;

▲ No hand digging without a written Method Statement having first been approved by the Site Arboriculturist;

▲ No ground level changes whatsoever;

▲ No storage of plant or materials;

▲ No storage or handling of any chemicals;

▲ If 360-degree excavators are to be used during construction, at no time is the excavating arm to encroach over the position of the protection barriers;

▲ No vehicular access;

▲ No fires should be lit within 10 metres of the nearest point of the canopy of any retained tree; and

▲ No equipment, signage, fencing, tree protection barriers, materials, components, vehicles or structures shall be attached to or supported by a retained tree.

Following the authorised tree works, TPF will be erected in accordance with BS5837:2012 that comprises 2 m tall welded mesh panels on rubber feet. The fence panels should be joined together using a minimum of two anti-tamper couplers, installed so they can only be removed from inside the fence.

The distance between the fence couplers should be at least 1 m and should be uniform throughout the fence. The panels should be supported on the inner side by stabiliser struts mounted on a block tray. (See Appendix C). The fencing is to be positioned at the edge of the RPA, and where ground protection is present, at the edge of the ground protection.

Arboricultural Method Statement for Limestone Extraction Proposed Limestone Extraction, Priors Hall, Corby Delta-Simons Project Number 17-1536.26 Page 4

Environment | Health & Safety | Sustainability

Once the barriers have been properly erected in position, they are to be considered fixed, and are not to be removed or altered in any way without prior approval from the Site Arboriculturist and the LPA.

Weather-proof signs shall be fixed to the outside of the walls with words such as ‘CONSTRUCTION EXCLUSION ZONE – NO ACCESS AND NO STORAGE OR WORKING WITHIN THIS AREA’. (See Appendix D).

All operatives and other relevant personnel are to be informed of the role of the exclusion barriers and their importance. A copy of the TPP will be displayed on-Site at all times during the construction process.

It may be necessary to remove part of the existing vegetation from under the canopy of the tree or remove over-hanging branches prior to erecting the fencing. Any works of this nature are to be carried out by hand.

The location of the protection barriers is indicated on Figures 2a and b. The position of the barriers is to be marked out with biodegradable marker paint on-Site and agreed with appropriate representatives from the LPA and the Site Contractor.

The barriers will be erected prior to any works on-Site in the vicinity of all retained trees, including enabling works or the delivery of machinery, materials, plant or equipment to the Site or any adjacent land. The barriers will remain in situ until final completion or until a time agreed by the LPA and Contractor.

3.1.4 Temporary Ground Protection Method and Specification In the unlikely event that it is required, the Contractor, Site Arboriculturist, and the LPA will liaise over measures for vehicular or pedestrian access for extraction operations to be located within a tree’s RPA. In such a case, a combination of barriers and ground protection should be adopted to form the CEZ. The objective is to minimise soil compaction.

▲ Example 1 - For pedestrian movements only, a single thickness of scaffold boards places either on top of a driven scaffold frame, so as to form a suspended walkway, or on top of a compression-resistant layer (e.g.) 100 mm depth of woodchip), laid on to a geotextile membrane (see Appendix E);

▲ Example 2 - For pedestrian-operated plant up to a gross weight of two tonnes, proprietary inter-linked ground protection boards placed on top of a compression-resistant layer (e.g. 150 mm depth of woodchip), laid onto a geotextile membrane; and

▲ Example 3 - For wheeled or tracked construction traffic exceeding two tonnes gross weight, an alternative system (e.g. proprietary systems or pre-cast reinforced concrete slabs) to an engineering specification designed in conjunction with arboricultural advice, to accommodate the likely loading to which it will be subjected.

The Ground Guards temporary road system can be used on construction sites to protect virgin ground from erosion and damage by construction vehicles. Ground Guards are usually installed as a construction ‘haul’ roadway consisting of a parallel track of 2.4 m x 1.2 m panels with a 1.2 m space in between. Where a temporary ‘haul’ roadway must pass near to trees, the following extra precautions must be taken in order to spread the loading applied to the track way:

▲ Edge rails of 200 x 50 mm sawn timber or un-treated sleepers should be installed where the track way will pass over exposed retained tree RPA’s. These should be installed on either side of the track way using either 50 x 50 x 500 mm timber stakes of 500 mm steel pins spaced at 1.5 m intervals;

▲ A layer of geotextile membrane should then be laid over the area of ground to have the track way installed upon it;

▲ A base layer of Ground Guards should be laid over the top of the geotextile membrane at least three boards wide between the installed timber edging;

▲ A minimum layer of at least 150 mm deep coarse, preferably green wood chippings should be laid as a compressible layer over the top of the Ground Guards; and

▲ The twin surface Ground Guard track way can then be laid over the top of the wood chippings.

Arboricultural Method Statement for Limestone Extraction Proposed Limestone Extraction, Priors Hall, Corby Delta-Simons Project Number 17-1536.26 Page 5

Environment | Health & Safety | Sustainability

4.0 Communications/Monitoring In order to ensure that the principles of tree protection set out in the statement are adhered to, the contact details of the key individuals involved with these works, and the tasks that require monitoring should be set out. These details should be retained by all relevant parties and available on-Site at all times. Relevant parties will be advised of any changes in personnel or contractor during the development process.

Before construction begins written confirmation that the Site contractor or its agents agree to comply in full with the principles set out within this Method Statement will be lodged with the LPA.

Specific Contacts are identified as follows:

▲ Developers Arboriculturalist: Pete Morrell, Delta-Simons

Pete.Morrell@deltasimons.com 07824 445051

4.1 Monitoring Monitoring of all trees on-Site and immediately adjacent to the Site will be undertaken by the developer’s arboriculturalist. This will take the form of Arboricultural Protection Site Inspections:

▲ Site inspections will be completed at regular intervals for the entire duration of on-Site external operations;

▲ Adherence to the approved Arboricultural Method Statement and any incidents will be monitored and recorded; and

▲ A Reporting Form (Appendix G) will be produced following each visit by the Developers Arboriculturalist and distributed to the LPA and Site contractor.

Arboricultural Method Statement for Limestone Extraction Proposed Limestone Extraction, Priors Hall, Corby Delta-Simons Project Number 17-1536.26 Page 6

Environment | Health & Safety | Sustainability

5.0 Limitations of the Arboricultural Method Statement The recommendations contained in this Method Statement represent Delta-Simons’ professional opinions, based upon the information referred to in Section 1.0 of this Method Statement, exercising the duty of care required of an experienced Environmental Consultant.

This Method Statement was prepared by Delta-Simons for the sole and exclusive use of the Client and for the specific purpose for which Delta-Simons was instructed as defined in Section 1.1 of this Method Statement. Nothing contained in this Method Statement shall be construed to give any rights or benefits to anyone other than the Client and Delta-Simons, and all duties and responsibilities undertaken are for the sole and exclusive benefit of the Client and not for the benefit of any other party. In particular, Delta-Simons does not intend, without its written consent, for this Method Statement to be disseminated to anyone other than the Client or to be used or relied upon by anyone other than the Client. Use of the Method Statement by any other person is unauthorised and such use is at the sole risk of the user. Anyone using or relying upon this Method Statement, other than the Client, agrees by virtue of its use to indemnify and hold harmless Delta-Simons from and against all claims, losses and damages (of whatsoever nature and howsoever or whensoever arising), arising out of or resulting from the performance of the work by the Consultant.

Environment | Health & Safety | Sustainability

Figure 1 – Site Location Map

TITLE:

FIGURE NO:

PROJECT NO:

DATE:

REVISION:

SCALE (@A4):

CHECKED BY:

DRAWN BY:

1:15000 17-1536

122 December 2020

2CSL

JBSite Location MapProposed Limestone and Sandstone ExtractionZones 2 and 3, Priors Hall, Corby

Scale: @ A4

LEGEND

Site Boundary

Service Layer Credits: Contains OS data @ Crown Copyright and Database Right 20191:15000

0 250 m

Site Location

Scale: 1 / 250,000 @ A4

Environment | Health & Safety | Sustainability

Figures 2a-c – Tree Protection Plan

H1

TG5

TG26

TG16

TG17

T7

TG10

H3

(3.90)

(13.80)

(6.00)

(4.80)

(3.60)

(6.00)

T6(9.90)

T8(4.20)

TG11(1.80)

H3

H2

T14(6.00)T13(6.80)

T12(3.90)

T27

H4

(1.80)

(1.80)

(1.80)

(1.80)

H2(1.80)

(0.90)TG40

(9.30)T15

TG9

Site Plan Provided by Client

LEGEND

Site Boundary

Category A: High valueretention most desirable

Category B: Moderate valueretention desirable

Category C: Lower valuecould be retained

Category U: For removal

Intact Species-PoorHedgerow

Defunct Species-PoorHedgerow

RPA: Root Protection Area

Tree Protection Fencing

Tx/TGx

Tx/TGx

Tx/TGx

Tx/TGx

(m)

TITLE: PROJECT NO:

FIGURE NO:

SCALE:

REVISION:

DRAWN BY:

CHECKED BY:

DATE:

Not to Scale

1

05 January 2021

17-1536.26

2a

KE

PMTree Protection PlanPriors Hall Park Zones 2 and 3Corby

H1

TG5

TG4

TG7

TG1

TG2

TG3

TG26

TG16

TG17

T7

TG10

TG22

H3

(9.00)

(6.60)

(4.80)

(5.40)

(3.90)

(3.90)

(13.80)

(6.00)

(4.80)

(3.60)

(6.00)

(3.60)

T6(9.90)

T8(4.20)

TG11(1.80)

H3

H2

T14(6.00)T13(6.80)

T12(3.90)

TG18(6.00)

TG19(1.80)

T20(9.30)

TG21(7.20)

T27(4.20)

H4

H4

H5

TG23(7.20)

TG24(6.00)

TG25(2.10)

TG28(4.80)

(3.30)H6

(1.80)

(1.80)

(1.80)

(1.80)

H2(1.80)

(1.80)

(1.80)

(1.80)

(0.90)TG40

(9.30)T15

H6

TG9

TG29

TG30

TG31

TG32

(3.60)

(3.30)

(3.30)

(1.80)

Not to Scale

1

05 January 2021

17-1536.26

2b

KE

PMTree Protection PlanPriors Hall Park Zones 2 and 3Corby

TITLE: PROJECT NO:

FIGURE NO:

SCALE:

REVISION:

DRAWN BY:

CHECKED BY:

DATE:

Site Plan Provided by Client

LEGEND

Site Boundary

Category A: High valueretention most desirable

Category B: Moderate valueretention desirable

Category C: Lower valuecould be retained

Category U: For removal

Intact Species-PoorHedgerow

Defunct Species-PoorHedgerow

RPA: Root Protection Area

Tree Protection Fencing

Tx/TGx

Tx/TGx

Tx/TGx

Tx/TGx

(m)

E 493535.756N290158.054

E 493537.314N290159.219

E 493521.750N290165.966

E 493531.240N290176.484

E 493488.966N290166.523

E 493464.046N290162.948

E 493463.485N290164.858

E 493479.882N290177.816

E 493525.044N290210.725

E 493528.122N290221.205

E 493531.877N290227.238

E 493514.714N290216.960

E 493535.310N290233.061

E 493537.727N290233.650

E 493536.817N290234.578

E 493473.597N290168.916

E 493476.419N290165.325

R=36.88m

R=266.44mE 493529.472N290163.282

R=45.0m

E 493533.681N290167.642

R=133.0m

E 493525.825N290216.188

R=38.13m

R=28.0m

R=94.48m

E 493526.137N290223.572

E 493505.841N 290189.606

NOTES1.

2.

CONTRACTORS MUST CHECK ALL DIMENSIONS ON SITE. ONLYFIGURED DIMENSIONS ARE TO BE WORKED FROM. DISCREPANCIESMUST BE REPORTED TO THE ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER BEFOREPROCEEDING. © THIS DRAWING IS COPYRIGHT.

REPRODUCED FROM OS SITEMAP ® BY PERMISSION OF ORDNANCESURVEY® ON BEHALF OF THE CONTROLLER OF HER MAJESTY'SSTATIONERY OFFICE. © CROWN COPYRIGHT 2008. ALL RIGHTSRESERVED. LICENCE NUMBER 100007126.

UNTIL TECHNICAL APPROVAL HAS BEEN OBTAINED FROM THERELEVANT AUTHORITIES, ALL DRAWINGS ARE ISSUED ASPRELIMINARY AND NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION. SHOULD THECONTRACTOR COMMENCE SITE WORK PRIOR TO APPROVAL BEINGGIVEN IT IS ENTIRELY AT HIS OWN RISK.

3.

SAFETY HEALTH ANDENVIRONMENTAL

0 4 62 10 20 30

TO BE READ IN CONJUNCTION WITHPDS GENERATED SETTING OUT REPORTS

IN ADDITION TO THE HAZARDS, RISKS NORMALLY ASSOCIATEDWITH THE TYPE OF WORK DETAILED ON THIS DRAWING, NOTE THEFOLLOWING SIGNIFICANT RISKS AND INFORMATION.

CONSTRUCTION:

1. WORKS ADJACENT TO LIVE CARRIAGEWAY

FOR INFORMATION RELATING TO END USE, MAINTENANCE,DEMOLITION, SEE THE HEALTH AND SAFETY FILE.

IT IS ASSUMED THAT ALL WORKS WILL BE CARRIED OUT BY ACOMPETENT CONTRACTOR, WHERE APPROPRIATE, TO AN APPROVEDMETHOD STATEMENT.

TITLE

DETAILS

SCALE: DRAWN: CHK:DATE:

Filepath:

DATE

AS BUILT

CHECKED

CONSTRUCTIONTENDER

DRAWN

PRELIMINARY

REVISION

INFORMATION

DESCRIPTION

15-17 GOLDINGTON ROADBEDFORDMK40 3NH

UNITED KINGDOMT. +44 (0)1234 268862F. +44 (0)1234 353034

MAIL@WOODSHARDWICK.COMWWW.WOODSHARDWICK.COM

ARCHITECTS, ENGINEERS AND DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS

WOODS HARDWICK

Please consider the environment before printing this drawing

WELDON PARKCORBY

JGF1:500 @ A1

15463-2110

PROPOSED A43 ROUNDABOUTSUPPLEMENTARY SETTING OUT

SEPTEMBER 2018 DSH

H2C

H3E

H3A

2 Bed2 Bed

3 Bed3 Bed

1

3

Town Ho

use

3BTo

wn Hous

e

3B

Town

House 3B

Town Ho

use

3B

Town

Hous

e 3B

Town

Hous

e

3B

Town Ho

use

3B

Town

House 3B

Town Ho

use

3B

3 Bed

3 Bed

3 Bed

3 Bed

2 Bed2 Bed

2 Bed2 Bed

2 Bed2 Bed

3 Bed

3 Bed

3 Bed

3 Bed

3 Bed

3 Bed

3 Bed

3 Bed

3 Bed

3 Bed

3 Bed

3 Bed

2 Bed2 Bed

2 Bed2 Bed

2 Bed2 Bed

3 Be

d

3 Be

d

3 Be

d

3 Be

d

3 Be

d

3 Be

d

3 Be

d

3 Be

d

Town Hous

e

3B

2 Bed2 Bed

2 Bed2 Bed

Town Ho

use

3B

Town

House 3B

3 Be

d3

Bed

3 Be

d3

Bed

3 Be

d3

Bed

2 Be

d2

Bed

2 Bed 2 Bed 2 Bed 2 Bed

2 Be

d2

Bed

2 Be

d2

Bed

3 Bed

2 Bed

3 Bed

3 Bed

3 Bed

3 Bed

3 Be

d

Acce

ss /

Serv

ice R

oad

only

H7

TG37

TG35

TG34

TG33

TG4

TG7

TG1

TG2

TG3

(3.60)

(6.00)

(5.40)

(6.00)

(9.00)

(6.60)

(4.80)

(5.40)

(3.90)

H5TG28(4.80)

TG38(3.60)

TG39(4.50)

TG36(3.60)

(3.30)H6

H6

H6

(1.80)

(1.80)

(1.80)

(1.80)

(1.80)

H6

TG29

TG30

TG31

TG32

TG30

(3.60)

(3.30)

(3.30)

(3.30)

(1.80)

Not to Scale

1

05 January 2021

17-1536.26

2c

KE

PMTree Protection PlanPriors Hall Park Zones 2 and 3 Corby

TITLE: PROJECT NO:

FIGURE NO:

SCALE:

REVISION:

DRAWN BY:

CHECKED BY:

DATE:

Site Plan Provided by Client

LEGEND

Site Boundary

Category A: High valueretention most desirable

Category B: Moderate valueretention desirable

Category C: Lower valuecould be retained

Category U: For removal

Intact Species-PoorHedgerow

Defunct Species-PoorHedgerow

RPA: Root Protection Area

Tree Protection Fencing

Tx/TGx

Tx/TGx

Tx/TGx

Tx/TGx

(m)

Environment | Health & Safety | Sustainability

Drawing 1 – 19934-RPS-MI-XX-DR-C-0700-Key Plan

DRAFT

BH

BH

BH

BH

MiningArea A

MiningArea B

Roman VillaExclusion Zone

Key

DLA Planning Application Boundary

Planning Application Boundary

Future Development Parcels

Existing Willowbrook Watercourse

Proposed Mining Area

Sherwood House, Sherwood Avenue,Newark, Nottinghamshire, NG24 1QQT:01636 605 700 E: rpsnewark@rpsgroup.com

Document Number Revision

DescriptionRev By Ckd Date

RPS Project Number

Project Code - Originator - Zone - Level - Type - Role - Drawing Number

Client

Title

Status

Task InformationManager

InformationAuthor

Project

Task TeamManager

Date CreatedScale @

MAKINGCOMPLEXEASY

Priors Hall Zones 2&3Corby

Minerals Extraction ApplicationKey Plan

S2

1:5000A1

23.10.2020

JE LAM SM

019934-RPS-MI-XX-DR-C-0700

NK019934

(Suitable for Information)

P02

© 2020 RPS Group

Notes

1. This drawing has been prepared in accordance with the scope of RPS’sappointment with its client and is subject to the terms and conditions ofthat appointment. RPS accepts no liability for any use of this documentother than by its client and only for the purposes for which it wasprepared and provided.

2. If received electronically it is the recipients responsibility to print tocorrect scale. Only written dimensions should be used.

3. This drawing should be read in conjunction with all other relevantdrawings and specifications.

P01 LAM SM 17.11.20First Issue

Urban & Civic

N

100m SCALE 1:5000

P02 Areas C & D, plus Stockpiles 1 & 2 removed. ??.??.????LAM

DRAFT

Environment | Health & Safety | Sustainability

Drawing 2 – 019934-RPS-MI-XX-DR-C-0705-Access Routes

DRAFT

BH

BH

BH

BH

A

B

MiningArea A

MiningArea B *

Roman VillaExclusion Zone

Key

DLA Planning Application Boundary

Planning Application Boundary

Future Development Parcels

Existing Willowbrook Watercourse

Proposed Mining Area

A

B

Notes - Access and Compound

Denotes schematic Access Routes.

Denotes Brook Crossing Point

Proposed access route to utilise existing crossingpoint over the Willowbrook.

Denotes Preliminary Site Compoundposition.

Denotes Future Site Compound position(upon completion of extraction works atMining Area A).

Site compound (both preliminary and future positions)to comprise a wellfare unit, site office unit, parking forcars & vans, a fuel bowser and spill kit. Compound tobe approximately 2,500m² in area.

*

Sherwood House, Sherwood Avenue,Newark, Nottinghamshire, NG24 1QQT:01636 605 700 E: rpsnewark@rpsgroup.com

Document Number Revision

DescriptionRev By Ckd Date

RPS Project Number

Project Code - Originator - Zone - Level - Type - Role - Drawing Number

Client

Title

Status

Task InformationManager

InformationAuthor

Project

Task TeamManager

Date CreatedScale @

MAKINGCOMPLEXEASY

Priors Hall Zones 2&3Corby

Minerals Extraction ApplicationKey Plan including SiteCompound and AccessSchematic Arrangements

S2

1:5000A1

23.10.2020

JE LAM SM

019934-RPS-MI-XX-DR-C-0705

NK019934

(Suitable for Information)

P03

© 2020 RPS Group

Notes

1. This drawing has been prepared in accordance with the scope of RPS’sappointment with its client and is subject to the terms and conditions ofthat appointment. RPS accepts no liability for any use of this documentother than by its client and only for the purposes for which it wasprepared and provided.

2. If received electronically it is the recipients responsibility to print tocorrect scale. Only written dimensions should be used.

3. This drawing should be read in conjunction with all other relevantdrawings and specifications.

4. Information relating to the Site Compound and proposed access routesprovided by Mapa Group via email dated 21/10/2020.

P01 LAM SM 17.11.20First Issue

Urban & Civic

N

100m SCALE 1:5000

P02 Access route key item note updated. 18.11.20SMLAM

P03 LAM ?? ??.??.??Areas C & D, plus Stockpiles 1 & 2 removed.

DRAFT

Environment | Health & Safety | Sustainability

Appendix Aa-b – Tree Survey

H1

TG5

TG4

TG7

TG1

TG2

TG3

TG26

TG16

TG17

T7

TG10

TG22

H3

T6

T8

TG11

H3

H2

T14T13

T12

TG18

TG19

T20

TG21

T27

H4

H4

H5

TG23

TG24

TG25

TG28H6

H2

TG40

T15

H6

TG9

TG29

TG30

TG31

TG32

Not to Scale

1

05 January 2021

17-1536.26

Appendix Aa

KE

PMTree SurveyPriors Hall Park Zones 2 and 3Corby

TITLE: PROJECT NO:

FIGURE NO:

SCALE:

REVISION:

DRAWN BY:

CHECKED BY:

DATE:

Site Plan Provided by Client

LEGEND

Site Boundary

Category A: High valueretention most desirable

Category B: Moderate valueretention desirable

Category C: Lower valuecould be retained

Category U: For removal

Intact Species-PoorHedgerow

Defunct Species-PoorHedgerow

Tx/TGx

Tx/TGx

Tx/TGx

Tx/TGx

E 493535.756N290158.054

E 493537.314N290159.219

E 493521.750N290165.966

E 493531.240N290176.484

E 493488.966N290166.523

E 493464.046N290162.948

E 493463.485N290164.858

E 493479.882N290177.816

E 493525.044N290210.725

E 493528.122N290221.205

E 493531.877N290227.238

E 493514.714N290216.960

E 493535.310N290233.061

E 493537.727N290233.650

E 493536.817N290234.578

E 493473.597N290168.916

E 493476.419N290165.325

R=36.88m

R=266.44mE 493529.472N290163.282

R=45.0m

E 493533.681N290167.642

R=133.0m

E 493525.825N290216.188

R=38.13m

R=28.0m

R=94.48m

E 493526.137N290223.572

E 493505.841N 290189.606

NOTES1.

2.

CONTRACTORS MUST CHECK ALL DIMENSIONS ON SITE. ONLYFIGURED DIMENSIONS ARE TO BE WORKED FROM. DISCREPANCIESMUST BE REPORTED TO THE ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER BEFOREPROCEEDING. © THIS DRAWING IS COPYRIGHT.

REPRODUCED FROM OS SITEMAP ® BY PERMISSION OF ORDNANCESURVEY® ON BEHALF OF THE CONTROLLER OF HER MAJESTY'SSTATIONERY OFFICE. © CROWN COPYRIGHT 2008. ALL RIGHTSRESERVED. LICENCE NUMBER 100007126.

UNTIL TECHNICAL APPROVAL HAS BEEN OBTAINED FROM THERELEVANT AUTHORITIES, ALL DRAWINGS ARE ISSUED ASPRELIMINARY AND NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION. SHOULD THECONTRACTOR COMMENCE SITE WORK PRIOR TO APPROVAL BEINGGIVEN IT IS ENTIRELY AT HIS OWN RISK.

3.

SAFETY HEALTH ANDENVIRONMENTAL

0 4 62 10 20 30

TO BE READ IN CONJUNCTION WITHPDS GENERATED SETTING OUT REPORTS

IN ADDITION TO THE HAZARDS, RISKS NORMALLY ASSOCIATEDWITH THE TYPE OF WORK DETAILED ON THIS DRAWING, NOTE THEFOLLOWING SIGNIFICANT RISKS AND INFORMATION.

CONSTRUCTION:

1. WORKS ADJACENT TO LIVE CARRIAGEWAY

FOR INFORMATION RELATING TO END USE, MAINTENANCE,DEMOLITION, SEE THE HEALTH AND SAFETY FILE.

IT IS ASSUMED THAT ALL WORKS WILL BE CARRIED OUT BY ACOMPETENT CONTRACTOR, WHERE APPROPRIATE, TO AN APPROVEDMETHOD STATEMENT.

TITLE

DETAILS

SCALE: DRAWN: CHK:DATE:

Filepath:

DATE

AS BUILT

CHECKED

CONSTRUCTIONTENDER

DRAWN

PRELIMINARY

REVISION

INFORMATION

DESCRIPTION

15-17 GOLDINGTON ROADBEDFORDMK40 3NH

UNITED KINGDOMT. +44 (0)1234 268862F. +44 (0)1234 353034

MAIL@WOODSHARDWICK.COMWWW.WOODSHARDWICK.COM

ARCHITECTS, ENGINEERS AND DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS

WOODS HARDWICK

Please consider the environment before printing this drawing

WELDON PARKCORBY

JGF1:500 @ A1

15463-2110

PROPOSED A43 ROUNDABOUTSUPPLEMENTARY SETTING OUT

SEPTEMBER 2018 DSH

H2C

H3E

H3A

2 Bed2 Bed

3 Bed3 Bed

1

3

Town Ho

use

3BTo

wn Hous

e

3B

Town

House 3B

Town Ho

use

3B

Town

Hous

e 3B

Town

Hous

e

3B

Town Ho

use

3B

Town

House 3B

Town Ho

use

3B

3 Bed

3 Bed

3 Bed

3 Bed

2 Bed2 Bed

2 Bed2 Bed

2 Bed2 Bed

3 Bed

3 Bed

3 Bed

3 Bed

3 Bed

3 Bed

3 Bed

3 Bed

3 Bed

3 Bed

3 Bed

3 Bed

2 Bed2 Bed

2 Bed2 Bed

2 Bed2 Bed

3 Be

d

3 Be

d

3 Be

d

3 Be

d

3 Be

d

3 Be

d

3 Be

d

3 Be

d

Town Hous

e

3B

2 Bed2 Bed

2 Bed2 Bed

Town Ho

use

3B

Town

House 3B

3 Be

d3

Bed

3 Be

d3

Bed

3 Be

d3

Bed

2 Be

d2

Bed

2 Bed 2 Bed 2 Bed 2 Bed

2 Be

d2

Bed

2 Be

d2

Bed

3 Bed

2 Bed

3 Bed

3 Bed

3 Bed

3 Bed

3 Be

d

Acce

ss /

Serv

ice R

oad

only

H7

TG37

TG35

TG34

TG33

TG4

TG7

TG1

TG2

TG3

H5TG28

TG38TG39

TG36

H6

H6

H6

H6

TG29

TG30

TG31

TG32

TG30

Not to Scale

1

05 January 2021

17-1536.26

Appendix Ab

KE

PMTree SurveyPriors Hall Park Zones 2 and 3Corby

TITLE: PROJECT NO:

FIGURE NO:

SCALE:

REVISION:

DRAWN BY:

CHECKED BY:

DATE:

Site Plan Provided by Client

LEGEND

Site Boundary

Category A: High valueretention most desirable

Category B: Moderate valueretention desirable

Category C: Lower valuecould be retained

Category U: For removal

Intact Species-PoorHedgerow

Defunct Species-PoorHedgerow

Tx/TGx

Tx/TGx

Tx/TGx

Tx/TGx

Environment | Health & Safety | Sustainability

Appendix B – Tree Schedule

Table 1 – BS 5837:2012 Tree Schedule – Zone 2 and 3 Tree Species Measurements Crown (m) Tree Condition Management

Tree N

umber

Common Name Latin Name

Maturity

Height (m

)

Stems

Stem

Diam

eter (m

m)

Average

Height

N E S W Roots Stem Crown Comments

Structural

Life Expectanc

y (yrs)

Category

RPA

(m)

Works

TG1 Crack willow Scots pine Silver birch

Salix fragilis Pinus sylvestris Betula pendula

SM M

20 Av 1 750

Av 0.5 6 5 4 6 No obvious visual damage

Single stems. Vertical Balanced F >40 B

2 9.0

TG2 Sycamore Scots pine

Acer pseudoplatanus Pinus sylvestris

SM M

22 Av 1 530

Av 0.5 7 6 5 5 No obvious visual damage

Single stems. Vertical

Mutually shared canopy

Phototropic reaction to dense planting. F 20 -

40 B2 6.6

Would benefit from selective

thinning.

TG3 Silver birch Crack willow

Betula pendula Salix fragilis SM 10

Av 1 400 Av 2 3 3 5 3 No obvious

visual damage

Single and multiple stems.

Vertical.

Mutually shared canopy

Group of willow and birch in varying degrees of health and form. Co-dominant stems within group. Failed stems to

willows.

F 20 - 40

B2 4.8

Would benefit from selective

thinning

TG4 Silver birch Betula pendula Y SM 8 Av 1 325

Av 1 2 3 2 3 No obvious visual damage

Single stem. Vertical

Mutually shared canopy

Plantation of birch with heights ranging from 8

m to 11 m F 20 -

40 B2 3.9

Would benefit from selective

thinning

TG5 Crack willow Salix fragilis SM 6 MS 325 4 3 2 2 2 No obvious

visual damage Single stems.

Vertical. Balanced Self-set willow. Fair condition. Low value F 20 -

40 C2 3.9 Remove

T6 Ash Fraxinus excelsior SM 17 M

S 9 x 275 4 5 5 5 5 No obvious

visual damage Multiple stems

at base Balanced Self-set ash. Fair condition. F 20-

40 B2 9.9 No works

T7 Ash Fraxinus excelsior M 10 1 1150 1 5 7 5 4

No obvious visual signs of

damage

Hollow trunk supporting

regrowth at 3 m

Unbalanced Rot holes and splits

present in trunk – Low BRP

F 20 -40

C2 13.8

Monitor annually

T8 Ash Fraxinus excelsior Y 13 2 15,

32.5 1 6 6 6 6 No obvious signs of damage

Bifurcated at 0.5 m Balanced

Self-set ash. Fair condition.

Bat box on main stem. Low BRP

F >40 B2 4.2 No works

TG9 Pedunculate oak Quercus robur Y 3 1 Av

75 1 1 1 1 1 No obvious visual damage

Single stems. Vertical. Balanced

Linear group of recently planted trees. Tree

supports still in place F >40 C

2 0.9 No works

TG10

Pedunculate oak Ash

Field maple English elm

Quercus robur Fraxinus excelsior

Acer campestre Ulmus procera

Y SM M

16 Av 1 500

Av 1 6 6 6 6 No obvious signs of damage

Single stems. Vertical

Mutually shared canopy

Linear group of trees. Number of trees

supporting ivy and woodpecker holes.

Several trees of Low BRP, remainder are of

negligible BRP. Majority of the elm are

dead/dying. Scattered semi-mature oaks

averaging heights of 20

G >40 A2

Av 6.0

Remove dead elm,

selectively thin to encourage strong healthy species and

selectively thin around oaks and ash to

provide sufficient light

Environment | Health & Safety | Sustainability

m, trunk diameters up to 920 mm and

diametrical spreads of 9 m with a life expectancy of 40+ years. Scattered mature ash averaging heights of 14 m with

signs of dieback in poor condition

and space for trees to reach full maturity

TG11

Field maple Ash

Wayfaring-tree

Small-leaved lime

Tillia cordata Hazel Apple Cherry

Dogwood

Acer campestre Fraxinus excelsior Viburnum lantana

Tillia cordata

Corylus avellane Malus pumila

Prunus sp. Cornus

sanguinea

Y 6 Av 1 150 Av 1 3 3 3 3 No obvious

signs of damage Single stems.

Vertical

Mutually shared canopy

Plantation of mixed broadleaf trees.

Phototropic reaction to dense planting.

F >40 B2 1.8

Would benefit from selective

thinning

T12 Pedunculate oak Quercus robur Y 14 1 325 3 6 6 6 6 No obvious

sings of damage

Single stem. Leaning to the

north

Dense, rounded canopy

Hedgerow tree F >40 C2 3.9 No works

T13 Ash Fraxinus excelsior SM 17 5 5 x

250 4 6 8 6 6 No obvious signs of damage

Multi-stemmed at

base. Vertical

Slightly unbalanced and lightly branching

Hedgerow tree F 20 - 40

C2 6.8 No works

T14 Ash Fraxinus excelsior

SM 12 5 5 x

220 5 4 4 4 4 No obvious signs of damage

Multi-stemmed at

base. Vertical

Rounded and well balanced

Hedgerow tree F 20 - 40

B2 6.0 No works

T15 Pedunculate oak Quercus robur SM 16 1 750 1 8 8 8 8 No obvious

visual damage Single stem.

Vertical

Balanced. Occasional scattered deadwood

F >40 B2 9.0 No works

TG16

Pedunculate oak

Silver birch English elm

Ash

Hawthorn

Wild cherry

Quercus robur Betula pendula Ulmus procera

Fraxinus excelsior

Crataegus monogyna

Prunus avium

Y 7 Av 1 300 Av 2 4 5 4 5

No obvious visual signs of

damage

Single stems. Vertical

Mutually shared canopy

Plantation of deciduous trees with heights

ranging from 7 m to 9 m with scattered ash at heights of up to 11 m

F 20 -40 B 3.6

Would benefit from selective

thinning

TG17

Pedunculate oak

Common lime Wild cherry

Ash Crab apple

Quercus robur Tilia europaea Prunus avium

Fraxinus excelsior

Malus sylvestris

SM Y 7 1 400

Av 0 5 4 5 3 No obvious signs of damage

Single stems. Vertical

Mutually shared canopy

Plantation of deciduous trees with heights

ranging from 7 m to 9 m with scattered ash at heights of up to 10 m

F 20 - 40 B 4.8

Would benefit from selective

thinning

Environment | Health & Safety | Sustainability

Crack willow Salix fragilis

TG18

Field maple Ash

Wayfaring-tree

Small-leaved lime

Tillia cordata Hazel Apple Cherry

Dogwood

Acer campestre Fraxinus excelsior Viburnum lantana

Tillia cordata

Corylus avellane Malus pumila

Prunus sp. Cornus

sanguinea

Y 6 Av 1 150 Av 1 3 3 3 3 No obvious

signs of damage Single stems.

Vertical

Mutually shared canopy

Plantation of mixed broadleaf trees.

Phototropic reaction to dense planting.

F >40 B2 1.8

Would benefit from selective

thinning

TG19

Pedunculate oak Ash

Field maple English elm

Quercus robur

Fraxinus excelsior

Acer campestre Ulmus procera

Y SM M

16 Av 1 500

Av 1 6 6 6 6 No obvious signs of damage

Single stems. Vertical

Mutually shared canopy

Linear group of trees. Number of trees

supporting ivy and woodpecker holes.

Several trees of Low BRP, remainder are of

negligible BRP. Majority of the elm are

dead/dying. Scattered semi-mature oaks

averaging heights of 20 m, trunk diameters up

to 920 mm and diametrical spreads of 9 m with a life expectancy of 40+ years. Scattered mature ash averaging heights of 14 m with

signs of dieback in poor condition

G >40 A2

Av 6.0

Remove dead elm,

selectively thin to encourage strong healthy species and

selectively thin around oaks and ash to

provide sufficient light and space for trees to reach full maturity

T20 Pedunculate oak Quercus robur SM 16 1 775 3 9 9 9 9 No obvious

visual damage Single stems.

Vertical. Balanced Set within screening plantation of young

trees F >40 A

2 9.3

TG21 Pedunculate

oak Scots pine

Quercus robur

Pinus sylvestris SM 18

Av 1 Av 600 4 7 7 7 7 No obvious

visual damage Single stems.

Vertical.

Mutually shared canopy

Off-Site plantation of deciduous and

coniferous trees with heights ranging from 8

m to 22 m

F 20-40

B2 7.2

TG22

Pedunculate oak

Silver birch English elm

Ash Hawthorn

Wild cherry Scots pine

Quercus robur Betula pendula Ulmus procera

Fraxinus excelsior

Crataegus monogyna

Prunus avium Pinus sylvestris

Y 7 Av 1 300 Av 2 4 5 4 5

No obvious visual signs of

damage

Single stems. Vertical

Mutually shared canopy

Plantation of deciduous and coniferous trees with heights ranging from 7 m to 9 m with

scattered ash at heights of up to 11 m

F 20 -40

B 2 3.6

Environment | Health & Safety | Sustainability

TG23

Hybrid black poplar Beech

Crack willow

Populus x canadensis

Fagus sylvatica Salix fragilis

SM 22 Av 1 Av

600 4 6 6 6 6 No obvious signs of damage

Single stems. Vertical

Mutually shared canopy

Off-Site plantation woodland. Phototropic

reaction to dense planting.

Several trees of Low BRP

F >40 B2 7.2

TG24

Crack willow

Scots pine Pedunculate

oak Wild cherry Field maple

Salix fragilis

Pinus sylvestris Quercus robur

Prunus avium

Acer campestre

SM 16 Av 1 500

Av 4 5 5 5 5 No obvious visual damage

Single stems. Vertical

Mutually shared canopy

Off-Site screening belt of trees F >40 B

2 6.0 No works

TG25 Sycamore Alder

Acer pseudoplatanus Alnus glutinosa

Y 8 Av 1 175 Av 0 3 3 3 3 No obvious

visual damage Single stems.

Vertical

Mutually shared canopy

Off-Site trees with phototropic reaction to

dense planting. F 20 -

40 B2 2.1 No works

TG26

Pedunculate oak

Silver birch Hawthorn

Crack willow Goat willow

Quercus robur Betula pendula

Crataegus monogyna

Salix fragilis Salix caprea

SM M

18 Av 1 500

Av 2 4 4 4 4 No obvious visual damage

Single stems. Vertical

Mutually shared canopy

Predominantly birch woodland with oak and understorey of willow on perimeter. Some

willows pollarded adjacent to the brook

G 20 - 40

A2 6.0 No works

T27 Alder Alnus glutinosa Y 7 1 250 0 3 3 3 3 No obvious visual damage

Single stem. Vertical. Balanced Positioned on top of

earth mound F >40 C2 3.0 No works

TG28

Lombardy poplar

Leyland cypress

Ash Scots pine

Osier Apple

Populus nigra var Italica

X Cupressocyparis

leylandii Fraxinus excelsior

Pinus sylvestris Salix viminalis Malus pumila

SM 15 Av 1 400

Av 0 4 4 4 4 No obvious visual damage

Single and multiple stems.

Vertical.

Mutually shared canopy

Linear group of off-Site trees in varying

degrees of health and form.

F 20 - 40

B2 4.8 No works

TG29 Italian alder

Ash Goat willow

Alnus cordata Fraxinus excelsior

Salix caprea

Y 10 Av

MS

275 Av 1 5 5 5 5 No obvious

visual damage

Single and multiple stems. Vertical

Balanced

Off-Site with alder dominating the planting. Occasional self-set ash

and goat willow. Fair condition.

F 20-40

B2 3.3

Would benefit from selective

thinning

TG30

Italian alder Hawthorn

Crack willow Goat willow

Ash

Alnus cordata Crataegus monogyna

Salix fragilis Salix caprea

Fraxinus excelsior

Y 12 Av

MS

275 Av 1 5 5 5 5 No obvious

signs of damage

Single and multiple stems. Vertical

Balanced

Predominately alder with self-set native

trees. Phototropic reaction to

dense planting

F >40 B2 3.3

Would benefit from selective

thinning

TG31 Larch

Corsican pine Scots Pine

Larix decidua Pinus nigra

Pinus sylvestris SM 12

Av 1 300 Av 4 4 4 4 4 No obvious

visual damage Single stems.

Vertical.

Mutually shared canopy

Phototropic reaction to dense planting. F 20 -

40 B2 3.6

Would benefit from selective

thinning

Environment | Health & Safety | Sustainability

TG32 Corsican pine Pinus nigra Y 10 Av

MS

275 Av 6 3 3 3 3 No obvious

visual damage Single stems.

Vertical

Mutually shared canopy

Phototropic reaction to dense planting. G 20 -

40 B1 3.3

Would benefit from selective

thinning

TG33 Scots pine Pinus sylvestris SM 16 Av 1 500

Av 3 3 4 3 5 No obvious signs of damage

Single stems. Vertical Balanced

Scots pine in fair condition and fair form.

Self-set sycamore F 20 -

40 B2 6.0

Would benefit from selective

thinning

TG34 Silver birch Scots pine

Betula pendula Pinus sylvestris SM 12

Av 1 450 Av 0 4 4 4 4 No obvious

signs of damage Single stems.

Vertical

Mutually shared canopy

Plantation of mixed broadleaf and conifer

trees. Phototropic reaction to dense

planting.

F 20 - 40

B2 5.4

Would benefit from selective

thinning

TG35 Scots pine Pinus sylvestris SM 14 Av 1 500

Av 2 3 4 4 3 No obvious signs of damage

Single stems. Vertical Balanced Group of pine in good

health and fair form F 20 - 40

B2 6.0 No works

TG36

Ash Sycamore

Pedunculate

oak Rowan

Cherry Lime

Fraxinus excelsior

Acer pseudoplatanus Quercus robur

Sorbus aucuparia Prunus sp.

Tilia x europaea.

Y Av12 1 Av 300 0.5 4 4 4 4 No obvious

visual damage Single stem.

Vertical Read as

one Number of suppressed

trees within group. F >40 B2 3.6

Would benefit from selective

thinning.

TG37 Larch

Corsican pine Scots Pine

Larix decidua Pinus nigra

Pinus sylvestris SM 12

Av 1 300 Av 4 3 2 2 No obvious

visual damage Single stems.

Vertical.

Mutually shared canopy

Phototropic reaction to dense planting. F 20 -

40 B2 3.6 No works

TG38

Ash Sycamore

Pedunculate

oak Rowan

Cherry Lime

Fraxinus excelsior

Acer pseudoplatanus Quercus robur

Sorbus aucuparia Prunus sp.

Tilia x europaea.

Y Av12 1 Av 300 0.5 4 4 4 4 No obvious

visual damage Single stem.

Vertical Read as

one Number of suppressed

trees within group. F >40 B2 3.6

Would benefit from selective

thinning.

TG39 Crack willow Salix fragilis Y 10 1 Av 375 2 3 3 3 3 No obvious

visual damage

Single and multiple stems.

Vertical.

Balanced Self-set group F >40 C2 4.5 No works

TG40 Pedunculate oak Quercus robur Y 3 1 Av

75 1 1 1 1 1 No obvious visual damage

Single stems. Vertical. Balanced

Linear group of recently planted trees. Tree

supports still in place F >40 C

2 0.9 No works

Environment | Health & Safety | Sustainability

Table 2 – Key to Tree Schedule

Measurements Age – Class Overall Condition BS 5837 2005 : Cascade Chart for Quality Assessment/Retention Category

Symbols:

MS – Multi-stemmed Y – Young G – Good A – High < = less than

Ht - Height in metres SM – Semi-Mature F – Fair B – Moderate ~ = approximately

Stem – Stem Diameter at 1.5m in mm EM – Early-mature P – Poor C – Low > = greater than

Crown – Crown spread in metres M – Mature D – Dead R – Trees for Removal

TD - Trunk division (height in metres) OM – Over-mature Est Yrs – estimate of years remaining (>40 years; 20 –40 years; <20 years)

Sub-categories: 1 = mainly arboricultural values 2 = mainly landscape values 3 = mainly cultural values.

Environment | Health & Safety | Sustainability

Appendix C – Tree Protection Barriers

Appendix C - Examples of Above Ground Stablizing System

Environment | Health & Safety | Sustainability

Appendix D – CEZ Warning Sign

– TREE PROTECTION AREA – KEEP OUT!

(TOWN & COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990) THE TREES ENCLOSED BY THIS FENCE ARE PROTECTED BY PLANNING

CONDITIONS, THE CONTRAVENTION OF WHICH MAY LEAD TO CRIMINAL PROSECUTION.

THE FOLLOWING MUST BE OBSERVED BY ALL PERSONNEL:

∆ THE PROTECTIVE FENCING MUST NOT BE MOVED ∆ NO PERSON SHALL ENTER THE CONSTRUCTION EXCLUSION ZONE ∆ NO MACHINE, PLANT OR VEHICLES SHALL ENTER THE EXCLUSION ZONE ∆ NO MATERIALS SHALL BE STORED IN THE EXCLUSION ZONE ∆ NO SPOIL SHALL BE DEPOSITED IN THE EXCLUSION ZONE ∆ NO EXCAVATION SHALL OCCUR IN THE EXCLUSION ZONE ∆ NO FIRES SHALL BE LIT IN THE EXCLUSION ZONE

ANY INCURSION INTO THE EXCLUSION ZONE MUST BE WITH THE

WRITTEN PERMISSION OF THE LOCAL PLANNING AUTHORITY

Environment | Health & Safety | Sustainability

Appendix E – Example of Ground Protection

Example of Ground Protection

Environment | Health & Safety | Sustainability

Appendix F – NJUG Volume 4

NJUG Volume 4

Environment | Health & Safety | Sustainability

Appendix G – AMS Reporting Form

Technical Note   

 

Project: Proposed Limestone Extraction,

Priors Hall, Corby

Job No: 17-1536.28

Subject: Arboricultural Inspection Visit Report Date:

Author: Peter Morrell Inspection:

 

 

 

Date of Inspection

1.0 Results

2.0…Actions to be taken

3.0 Photographs

Date of next visit –

Distribution 

Tree Officer Site Engineer Site Manager Job File 17-1536.28