phase 2 conflation of modes of proceedings_24 mar
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/7/2019 Phase 2 Conflation of Modes of Proceedings_24 Mar
1/46
Conflation of Modes of
Commencement
Of Proceedings and Interlocutory
Applications
-
8/7/2019 Phase 2 Conflation of Modes of Proceedings_24 Mar
2/46
SUPREME COURT
S I N G A P O R E
2
Overview of Scope of Amendments
Simplification of Procedural Rules
To reduce the four present modes to just two: writ
and OS
Modernisation of language and
standardisation of phraseology
-
8/7/2019 Phase 2 Conflation of Modes of Proceedings_24 Mar
3/46
SUPREME COURT
S I N G A P O R E
3
Reform of the Rules of Court
22May 2004: Recommendation by ROCWP.
27May 2005: ROCWP Report No 3 of2005presented to Rules Committee.
9 June 2005: Law Society informed byRegistrar, Supreme Court.
June 2005: Consultation with AGC, IPTO,Family Court and Ministry of Law onconsequential amendments to relevantprimary/subsidiary legislation.
-
8/7/2019 Phase 2 Conflation of Modes of Proceedings_24 Mar
4/46
SUPREME COURT
S I N G A P O R E
4
Reform of the Rules of Court
28 July 2005: Report approved by Rules
Committee. 1 January 2006: First phase covering Rules
of Court & Legal Profession Rules
1 April 2006: Second Phase to coverBankruptcy Rules, Companies & LLP(Winding Up) Rules, Companies Regulations& Matrimonial Proceedings Rules
-
8/7/2019 Phase 2 Conflation of Modes of Proceedings_24 Mar
5/46
SUPREME COURT
S I N G A P O R E
5
Only 2 Modes of Commencement
Writ of summons and originating summons.
Writ of summons for factual disputes.
OS for non-factual disputes and for originating
applications to the court under any statute.
Order5 Rules of Court.
Originating motions and petitions will be
abolished.
-
8/7/2019 Phase 2 Conflation of Modes of Proceedings_24 Mar
6/46
SUPREME COURT
S I N G A P O R E
6
Originating Summonses
No appearance to be entered to OS.
Inter partes & ex parte OS: Forms 4 & 5
As a general rule, originating summonses tobe heard in chambers in the first instance: O28 r2 Subject to the courts discretion or any written law
or practice direction that certain classes be heardin open court
-
8/7/2019 Phase 2 Conflation of Modes of Proceedings_24 Mar
7/46
SUPREME COURT
S I N G A P O R E
7
Interlocutory Applications
The summons is to be the sole mode for
interlocutory applications
As a general rule, summonses to be heard in
chambers: O 32 r11
Subject to the courts discretion or any written lawor practice direction that certain summonses be
heard in open court.
-
8/7/2019 Phase 2 Conflation of Modes of Proceedings_24 Mar
8/46
SUPREME COURT
S I N G A P O R E
8
Catch-all provision
Section 41A Interpretation Act:
This clause will deem the change in the event of
any omission in amending the relevant legislation.
-
8/7/2019 Phase 2 Conflation of Modes of Proceedings_24 Mar
9/46
-
8/7/2019 Phase 2 Conflation of Modes of Proceedings_24 Mar
10/46
Conflation of Modes ofConflation of Modes of
Commencement of Proceedings:Commencement of Proceedings:
Changes to Insolvency ProceedingsChanges to Insolvency Proceedings
Phase IIPhase II
(with effect from 1 April 2006)(with effect from 1 April 2006)
-
8/7/2019 Phase 2 Conflation of Modes of Proceedings_24 Mar
11/46
SUPREME COURT
S I N G A P O R E
11
AgendaAgenda
Changes to EFS
Overview of amendments to proceedings
relating to:(a) bankruptcy
(b) Winding up of companies and limited liability partnerships
(c) Judicial management of companies.
Impact on practice
-
8/7/2019 Phase 2 Conflation of Modes of Proceedings_24 Mar
12/46
(A) Overview of Amendments to(A) Overview of Amendments to
Bankruptcy ProceedingsBankruptcy Proceedings
Bankruptcy Act (Cap 20) and the BankruptcyBankruptcy Act (Cap 20) and the Bankruptcy
Rules (Cap 20, Rule 1)Rules (Cap 20, Rule 1)
-
8/7/2019 Phase 2 Conflation of Modes of Proceedings_24 Mar
13/46
SUPREME COURT
S I N G A P O R E
13
Bankruptcy ProceedingsBankruptcy Proceedings
Applications to be made by originatingsummons supported by affidavit
Affidavit to be filed at the same time as the
OS (RR 106(1) and 138)
Date of hearing is annotated directly onto the
OS (R 107)
-
8/7/2019 Phase 2 Conflation of Modes of Proceedings_24 Mar
14/46
SUPREME COURT
S I N G A P O R E
14
Bankruptcy ProceedingsBankruptcy Proceedings
Limited validity period for the purpose of service (R11A)
12 months: where leave to serve OS out of jurisdiction is
required
6 months: in all other cases
Application for extension ofvalidityApplication for extension ofvalidity
May be extended for such period not exceeding 12 months at
any one time
OS to be marked with stamp in Form 1A showing the period of
extension granted
Renewed OS to be filed electronically
-
8/7/2019 Phase 2 Conflation of Modes of Proceedings_24 Mar
15/46
SUPREME COURT
S I N G A P O R E
15
Creditors bankruptcy applicationCreditors bankruptcy application
NB: all other procedural requirements remainunchanged. E.g. Filing of affidavit of service ofSD/Bankruptcy application; affidavit of non-satisfaction
Form 2 of Bankruptcy Rules
No longer petitioning creditor and debtor
But plaintiff and defendant
Form 3: to be used for filing the supporting affidavit
-
8/7/2019 Phase 2 Conflation of Modes of Proceedings_24 Mar
16/46
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE REPUBLIC OF SINGAPORE
Bankruptcy O.S. No )of 2006 )
In the matter of the Bankruptcy Act (Chapter 20)
And
In the matter of BBB (NRIC No. S2222222B)
Between
ABC(NRIC No. S1111111A)
Plaintiff.
And
BBB(NRIC No. S2222222B)
Defendant.
CREDITORS BANKRUPTCY APPLICATION
Let all parties concerned attend before the Registrar in Chambers on ________________________ (date/time) on the hearing of an application by theplaintiff that a bankruptcy order be made against BBB.
Dated this 1st day of April 2006.Registrar
his summons is taken out by GGG & Partners, solicitor for the said plaintiff whosedress is 10, Rules Lane, Singapore 123456.
ote: This summons shall be served together with an affidavit in support of th plication. This summons may not be served more than 6 calendar months after the
bove date unless renewed by order of the Court.
-
8/7/2019 Phase 2 Conflation of Modes of Proceedings_24 Mar
17/46
Endorsement
This application has been filed in court on the 1 st day of April 2006.
If you intend to oppose this application you must, not later than 3 days before the dayfixed for hearing,
a) file in court a notice specifying the grounds on which you object to themaking of a bankruptcy order;
b) send a copy of the notice to the plaintiff or his solicitor at theabovementioned address; and
c) send a copy of the notice to the Official Assignee at 45, Maxwell Road,#06-11, The URA Centre (East Wing), Singapore 069118.
If a defendant does not attend personally or by his counsel or solicitor at the timend place abovementioned such order will be made as the Court may think just and
expedient.
-
8/7/2019 Phase 2 Conflation of Modes of Proceedings_24 Mar
18/46
BANKRUPTCY ACT
(CHAPTER 20)
BANKRUPTCY RULES
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE REPUBLIC OF SINGAPORE
Bankruptcy O.S. No )of 2006 )
In the matter of the Bankruptcy Act (Chapter 20)
And
In the matter of BBB (NRIC No. S2222222B)
Between
ABC(NRIC No.S1111111A)
Plaintiff.
And
BBB(NRIC No.
S2222222B)
Defendant.
AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF
CREDITORS BANKRUPTCY APPLICATION
I, XYZ (NRIC No. S11111111A), of 123, Rules Road, Singapore 123123,do affirm and say as follows:
1. I am the Assistant Vice-President of the Plaintiff. I am duly authorised by the Plaintiffto make this affidavit on its behalf. A copy of the authority given to me is annexed hereto andmarked A. I have been dealing with the matters giving rise to this application and have therequisite knowledge of the matters re ferred to in this affidavit.
2. The Defendant is domiciled in Singapore and has within the period of one yearimmediately preceding the date of the application been residing at Blk 234, Court Road, #01-01, Singapore 234234.
-
8/7/2019 Phase 2 Conflation of Modes of Proceedings_24 Mar
19/46
3. The defendant is justly and truly indebted to me/us in the aggregate sum of $100,000full particulars of which are set out in the annexure to this application.
4. The above-mentioned debt is for liquidated sum payable immediately and thedefendant appears to be unable to pay it.
5. On 1 March 2006, a statutory demand was personally served upon the defendant by inrespect of the abovementioned debt. Twenty-one days have lapsed since the service of thedemand and to the best of my knowledge and belief, the demand has neither been compliedwith nor set aside in accordance with the Bankruptcy Rules and no application to set aside ioutstanding.
6. I do not, nor does any person on my behalf, hold any security on the debtors estate,
or any part thereof, for the payment of the above-mentioned sum.
7. There has been no stay of execution in respect of this debt.
Affirmed by the abovenamed )XYZ )on the 1
stday of April 2006 )
Before me
Commissioner for Oaths
-
8/7/2019 Phase 2 Conflation of Modes of Proceedings_24 Mar
20/46
SUPREME COURT
S I N G A P O R E
20
Debtors bankruptcy applicationDebtors bankruptcy application
NB: requirement of filing a Statement of Affairs
together with an affidavit verifying the statement of
affairs remains.
Form 9 of Bankruptcy Rules: OS
Form 10: to be used for filing the supporting
affidavit
-
8/7/2019 Phase 2 Conflation of Modes of Proceedings_24 Mar
21/46
Rule 134FORM 9
BANKRUPTCYACT
(CHAPTER20)
BANKRUPTCYRULES
I
T
I
OURT OF T
REPUBLI
OF
I
PORE
Bankruptcy )
O.
.
o )Of20 )(
eal)
DEBTORS BANKRUPTCYAPPLICATION
In the matter of the Bankruptcy
ct (
ap 20)
nd
In the matter of
Applicant
Let all parties concerned attend before the Judge/Registrar on(date/time), on the hearing of the application by that
1. a bankruptcy order be made against myself, (State name); and
2. (state name of trustee of bankruptcy) be appointed as trustee of mybankruptcy estate hose certificate of consent to act is annexedhereto
ated this day of 20
Registrar
his summons is taken out by of solicitorfor the said applicant hose address is . (or here the applicant appears in person)
his summons is taken out by the said applicant ho resides at and istate occupation) and (if the applicant does not reside ithin the
urisdiction) hose address for service is
ote: This summons shall be served together ith an affidavit in support of the
plication. This summons may not be served more than 6 calendar months aftere above date unless rene ed by order of the
ourt.
-
8/7/2019 Phase 2 Conflation of Modes of Proceedings_24 Mar
22/46
SUPREME COURT
S I N G A P O R E
22
Other applications under theOther applications under the
Bankruptcy RulesBankruptcy Rules
Parties referred to as plaintiff and defendant
Rule 97: application to set aside statutory demand No change
Application to be made by way of OS
To use Form 4 of Appendix A of the Rules of Court inter partes originating summons
-
8/7/2019 Phase 2 Conflation of Modes of Proceedings_24 Mar
23/46
SUPREME COURT
S I N G A P O R E
23
Other applications under theOther applications under the
Bankruptcy RulesBankruptcy Rules
All interlocutory applications to be madeusing Form 60 of the Rules of Court
Rule 11: every interlocutory application inthe course of bankruptcy application shall be
made by summons
-
8/7/2019 Phase 2 Conflation of Modes of Proceedings_24 Mar
24/46
SUPREME COURT
S I N G A P O R E
24
(B)(B) OverviewOverview of of AmendmentsAmendments toto
WindingWinding UpUp proceedingsproceedings
Winding up oflimited liability partnerships under the
Limited Liability Partnerships Act 2005 (No 5 of 2005)
and Limited Liability (Winding Up) Rules 2005 (S
532/2005)
Winding up ofcompanies under section 410 of theCompanies Act (Cap 50) and the Companies (Winding
Up) Rules (Cap 50, Rule 1)
-
8/7/2019 Phase 2 Conflation of Modes of Proceedings_24 Mar
25/46
SUPREME COURT
S I N G A P O R E
25
Winding up proceedingsWinding up proceedings
CWU
LWU
EFS Case type
-
8/7/2019 Phase 2 Conflation of Modes of Proceedings_24 Mar
26/46
SUPREME COURT
S I N G A P O R E
26
Winding up proceedingsWinding up proceedings
Open Court see Rules 5 of Companies
(Winding Up) Rules and Limited LiabilityPartnership (Winding Up) Rules
Originating Summons (instead of originating
petition) supported by affidavit
-
8/7/2019 Phase 2 Conflation of Modes of Proceedings_24 Mar
27/46
SUPREME COURT
S I N G A P O R E
27
Winding up proceedingsWinding up proceedings
Affidavit to be filed together with originating
summons: see rules 25, Companies (Winding Up)
Rules and Limited Liability Partnerships (Winding
Up) Rules.
To state the relief sought for
Supporting facts that are currently in the petition are
to be averred to in the supporting affidavit
Affidavit:
Originating Summons:
-
8/7/2019 Phase 2 Conflation of Modes of Proceedings_24 Mar
28/46
SUPREME COURT
S I N G A P O R E
28
Winding up proceedingsWinding up proceedings
Party is to be named as applicant in the
originating summons (previously
petitioner)
Voluntary winding up applications (Form 2):
-
8/7/2019 Phase 2 Conflation of Modes of Proceedings_24 Mar
29/46
FORM 2
Rule 22
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE REPUBLIC OF SINGAPORE
CWU O.S. No. )of 20 )
(Seal).
In the Matter of the Companies Act (Chapter 50)
AND
In the Matter of _____________________
Applicant
ORIGINATING SUMMONS
Let all parties concerned attend before the Judge on __________________________(date/time) on the hearing of an application by the applicant that:
(1) a winding up order be made against the applicant; [and
(2) __________________________ be appointed as liquidator of the applicant].
Dated this day of 20 .
Registrar.
This summons is taken out by ofsolicitor for the applicant whose address is
Note: This summons shall be served together with an affidav it in support of the application.
This summons may not be served more than 6 ca lendar months after the above da te unless renewed by order of theCourt.
-
8/7/2019 Phase 2 Conflation of Modes of Proceedings_24 Mar
30/46
SUPREME COURT
S I N G A P O R E
30
Winding up proceedingsWinding up proceedings
Parties should be referred to as plaintiff anddefendant (previously petitioner andrespondent)
All other winding up applications (Form 3)
-
8/7/2019 Phase 2 Conflation of Modes of Proceedings_24 Mar
31/46
F O R M 3
R u l e 2 2
I N T H E H I G H C O U R T O F T H E R E P U B L I C O F S IN G A P O R E
C W U O . S . N o . )
o f 2 0 )
( S e a l ) .
I n t h e M a t te r o f t h e C o m p a n i e s A c t (C h a p t e r 5 0 )
A N D
I n t h e M a t te r o f _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
B e t w e e n
P l a i n t i f f .
a n d
D e fe n d a n t .
O R I G I N A T IN G S U M M O N S
L e t a l l p a r t ie s c o n c e r n e d a t te n d b e f o r e th e J u d g e o n _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ( d a t e /t im e )o n t h e h e a r i n g o f a n a p p l i c a t i o n b y t h e p l a i n t i ff t h a t :
( 1 ) a w i n d i n g u p o r d e r b e m a d e a g a i n s t t h e d e f e n d a n t ; [ a n d
( 2 ) _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ b e a p p o i n t e d a s l iq u i d a t o r o f t h e d e f e n d a n t ] .
D a t e d t h i s d a y o f 2 0 .
R e g i s t r a r .
T h i s s u m m o n s i s t a k e n o u t b y o f
s o l i c it o r f o r t h e p l a i n t i ff w h o s e a d d r e s s i s
N o t e : T h i s s u m m o n s s h a l l b e s e r v e d t o g e t h e r w i t h a n a f f id a v i t in s u p p o r t o f t h e a p p l i c a t io n .T h i s s u m m o n s m a y n o t b e s e rv e d m o r e th a n 6 c a le n d a r m o n t h s a ft e r t h e a b o v e d a te u n l e ss r e n e w e d b y o r d e r
o f t h e C o u r t .I f a d e f e n d a n t d o e s n o t a t t e n d p e r s o n a l l y o r b y h i s c o u n s e l o r s o l ic i t o r a t t h e ti m e a n d p l a c e a b o v e m e n t i o n e ds u c h o r d e r w i ll b e m a d e a s t h e C o u r t m a y t h i n k j u s t a n d e x p e d i e n t.
-
8/7/2019 Phase 2 Conflation of Modes of Proceedings_24 Mar
32/46
SUPREME COURT
S I N G A P O R E
32
Winding up proceedingsWinding up proceedings
Where validity of OS has been extended, before it
is served, it must be marked with an official stamp
in Form 3A (R17A(4))
Rule 17A which provides for validity of OS:
6 months for the purpose of serviceApplication to renew OS if not served within 6
months
May be extended for such period not exceeding 6
or12 months (similar to O 7 r5 of Rules of Court)
Renewed OS to be filed electronically
-
8/7/2019 Phase 2 Conflation of Modes of Proceedings_24 Mar
33/46
SUPREME COURT
S I N G A P O R E
33
Winding up proceedingsWinding up proceedings
e.g. requirement of advertising the winding up
application seven clear days before the
hearing of the winding up application remains
NO amendments made to other
procedures/ time-lines
-
8/7/2019 Phase 2 Conflation of Modes of Proceedings_24 Mar
34/46
SUPREME COURT
S I N G A P O R E
34
Summary: Winding Up proceedingsSummary: Winding Up proceedings
Type of changes Existing Companies (Winding Up)
Rules
Amended Companies (Winding
Up) Rules
Mode of commencement Originating petition and affidavitverifying petition
Originating summons (OS) withsupporting affidavit
Form to be
used
Application by
company
Form 2 (petition) and Form 7(affidavit)
Form 2 (OS) and Form 5 (affidavit)
Application by
other person
Form 3 (petition by unpaid creditor onsimple contract) and Form 7
(affidavit)
Form 3 (OS) and Form 5 (affidavit)
When to file supporting affidavit Within 4 days after petition ispresented
To be filed together with OS
Names of
parties on
originating
process
Application by
company
Petitioner Applicant
Application by
other person
Petitioner and respondent Plaintiff and defendant
Validity of originating process No validity period 6 months (for purpose of service)
-
8/7/2019 Phase 2 Conflation of Modes of Proceedings_24 Mar
35/46
(C) Overview of amendments to(C) Overview of amendments to
Judicial management proceedingsJudicial management proceedings
Section 227A of the Companies ActSection 227A of the Companies Act
(Cap 50) and the Companies(Cap 50) and the Companies
Regulations (Cap 50, Regulation 1)Regulations (Cap 50, Regulation 1)
-
8/7/2019 Phase 2 Conflation of Modes of Proceedings_24 Mar
36/46
SUPREME COURT
S I N G A P O R E
36
Judicial management proceedingsJudicial management proceedings
From 1 April 2006, EFS case type will switch (from
OP) to OS
Rule 30 of the Companies Regulations (JudicialManagement) application for JM order to bemade by OS (Form 63A)
Supporting facts to be deposed to in affidavit
supporting OS (Form 63B)
Supporting affidavit to be filed together with OS
-
8/7/2019 Phase 2 Conflation of Modes of Proceedings_24 Mar
37/46
SUPREME COURT
S I N G A P O R E
37
Judicial management proceedingsJudicial management proceedings
Pursuant to Order28, Rule 2 of the Rules of
Court, the Registrar has directed in paragraph
29(6)(p) of the Supreme Court Practice Directions(2006 Ed) that these applications are to be heard
in open Court.
Open Court
JM applications will continue to be heard in openCourt in the first instance
-
8/7/2019 Phase 2 Conflation of Modes of Proceedings_24 Mar
38/46
Impact on practiceImpact on practice
-
8/7/2019 Phase 2 Conflation of Modes of Proceedings_24 Mar
39/46
SUPREME COURT
S I N G A P O R E
39
Impact on practiceImpact on practice
No changes in fee structure
Changes mostly pertain to mode of
commencement
-
8/7/2019 Phase 2 Conflation of Modes of Proceedings_24 Mar
40/46
SUPREME COURT
S I N G A P O R E
40
Amendments of pending Motions, PetitionsAmendments of pending Motions, Petitions
and SICsand SICs
Amendments using existing (old) forms and
procedure
For cases pending or applications filed priorto 1 April 2006
-
8/7/2019 Phase 2 Conflation of Modes of Proceedings_24 Mar
41/46
Changes to EFSChanges to EFS
-
8/7/2019 Phase 2 Conflation of Modes of Proceedings_24 Mar
42/46
SUPREME COURT
S I N G A P O R E
42
Schedule of changesSchedule of changes
31March 2006 (Friday):
EFS will be shut down from 2359 hours toimplement the necessary technical modificationsto EFS
No EFS filing of any documents relating to Phase
2 proceedings
Other documents not relating to Phase 2 maycontinue to be filed
-
8/7/2019 Phase 2 Conflation of Modes of Proceedings_24 Mar
43/46
SUPREME COURT
S I N G A P O R E
43
Schedule of changes
1 April 2006 (Saturday):
Legal Registry will be open from 0900 hours to 1230hours
Urgent applications relating to Phase 2 to see Duty
Registrar for leave to file hard copies
Leave may be granted upon undertaking to fileelectronically when EFS filing resumes
Where necessary, request to backdate documents to 1
April 2006 should be made when documents are filed
electronically
-
8/7/2019 Phase 2 Conflation of Modes of Proceedings_24 Mar
44/46
SUPREME COURT
S I N G A P O R E
44
Please note:
Schedule of changesSchedule of changes
manual filing of documents will not be processed after1230hours on 1 April 2006
For urgent applications relating to Phase 2 proceedings which
will be time-barredif not filed between 1230 hours on 1 April 2006
and 2000 hours on 2 April 2006, they may be sent to the Supreme
Court Registry via e-mail to [email protected]
Once EFS server is activated, documents should be filed with a
request to backdate time of filing
Legal Registry reserves the right not to backdate documents
where applications are not genuinely urgent
-
8/7/2019 Phase 2 Conflation of Modes of Proceedings_24 Mar
45/46
SUPREME COURT
S I N G A P O R E
45
Schedule of changes
2 April 2006 (Sunday):
Front end filing resumed by 2000 hours
CrimsonLogic Helpdesk: Hotline 68877888 will continue to answer all queries
concerning filing procedure in EFS and other technicaldifficulties arising from the legislative changes.
No legal advice will be provided.
-
8/7/2019 Phase 2 Conflation of Modes of Proceedings_24 Mar
46/46
The EndThe End
Thank you.Thank you.
AR Yeong Zee KinAR Yeong Zee Kin
AR Chung Yoon JooAR Chung Yoon Joo
ARDorcas QuekARDorcas Quek