conflation of aquatic habitat data for linking stream and landscape features
DESCRIPTION
Conflation of aquatic habitat data for linking stream and landscape features. Mindi Sheer, NOAA fisheries – Northwest Fisheries Science Center, Seattle Bernard Catalinotto – DES, Maryland. Conflation. SOURCE -GOOD ATTRIBUTES. TARGET GOOD LINEWORK. RESULT BEST ATTRIBUTES & LINEWORK. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Conflation of aquatic habitat data for linking stream and
landscape features
Mindi Sheer, NOAA fisheries – Northwest Fisheries Science Center, SeattleBernard Catalinotto – DES, Maryland
What is “GIS Data Conflation?”
Combining attributes and arcs, polygons, or points of two GIS files to create a third, best-case data set.
The first dataset is the “source” The second dataset is the “target” The combination of source + target is the “result”
SOURCE
-GOOD
ATTRIBUTES
TARGETGOODLINEWORK
Conflation
RESULTBEST ATTRIBUTES & LINEWORK
►Automatically match corresponding arc nodes►Automatically match corresponding arcs within user-defined distance►Check and fix errors
Conflation software requires three major steps:
TARGET
SOURCE
ObjectivesObjectives►GIS data conflation
How conflation is applied to hydrographic datasets
►Watershed case study Use of conflation Habitat study results
►Benefits and “caveats” of conflating►Recommendations
GIS Data Conflation - ExampleGIS Data Conflation - Example►US Census Bureau:
Realigning 50 million TIGER file road & hydro arcs, 3200 counties
Target – 1:6,000 & 1:2,000 Target – 1:6,000 & 1:2,000 (photogrammetry(photogrammetry))
Source – 1:100,000 Source – 1:100,000 DIME (1970)DIME (1970)
Why conflate streams?
► Highly variable spatial representation of stream features ► Limitations in positional accuracy, density, and sinuousity of
100k streams, can result in inaccurate results
Multiple methods & sources of stream hydrography
Stream Length
0
2
4
6
8
10
10
0k
24
k
10
0k
24
k
10
0k
24
k
10
0k
24
k
10
0k
24
k
10
0k
24
k
10
0k
24
k
10
0k
24
k
10
0k
24
k
10
0k
24
k
10
0k
24
k
10
0k
24
k
MF Will Mckenzie Hood River Clackamas Sandy S.Santiam N.Santiam
Molalla
Stream Scale / Watershed
Kilo
met
ers
(100
0 km
2)
100k streams
Stream density
Stream sinuousity
Project Background► The challenge: 1. Stream hydrography & land
cover to correlate landscape & fine-scale stream morphology
2. Validation of DEM-based modeled stream
► Sources: Oregon Dept. of Fish and
Wildlife Surveys (1:100,000)
DEM hydro (1:24,000)
TARGET: DEM-derived 24k reach-segmented streams
►SOURCE: Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW) segmented field data
►All source (survey data) successfully transferred ►Target DEM reaches were subdivided to reflect
relative arc length of the habitat unit►Small amount of stretching of arcs at the unit
scale
Conflation Results
Also…
►10% of the data had “0” arc lengths (dyn segmentation)
►“0” length channels were secondary channels to the main stream (important as salmon rearing habitat)
Channel Complexity
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Individual Survey Streams, S. Santiam
Co
mp
lexi
ty (
sid
ech
ann
el/k
m)
New
Survey
New Update
Habitat Results
► Length differences (+ 9%): 1639 km (New) 1507 km (Survey)
85% of conflated stream units +/- 10 m
New lengths matched calibration info
0-5 m
-5-0 m
Difference in conflated length (m)
Cou
nt
(# a
rcs)
Watershed scale habitat variables
0
2
4
6
8
Watershed
Bou
lder
s / m
eter
(#)
Boulder(Survey)
Boulder(conflated)
0
2
4
6
8
590 246 153 118 92 70 14
Length of Target Reach (m)
Str
ea
m G
rad
ien
t (%
)
0
2
4
6
8
575 319 220 160 126 101 81 62 32
Length of Target Reach (m)
Str
ea
m G
rad
ien
t (%
)
30 per. Mov. Avg.(Net Slope)
30 per. Mov. Avg.(Field Slope)
Model Validation - Gradient
Field slope
Model slope
Molalla
North Santiam
Conclusions► Benefits
►Provides substantial benefits to ecological studies►Allows automated and manual processing►Data was validated effectively►Results had higher confidence than if conflation had not been used
► Costs►Conflation was performed at low cost for major project (80,000
features)
► Recommendations►Recommend researchers consider using conflation on their multi-scale
projects
Feel free to contact Us….
►Mindi Sheer NOAA [email protected] 206-860-3428
►Bernard Catalinotto Data Enhancement Services, LLC [email protected] 301-717-1077