peter cauwelier - team psychological safety – what google discovered about high performance teams

70
Team Psychological Safety what Google discovered about highperformance teams ©2016 Peter Cauwelier

Upload: certes

Post on 17-Feb-2017

76 views

Category:

Leadership & Management


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Team  Psychological  Safety      

 what  Google  discovered  about  high-­‐performance  

teams  

©2016  Peter  Cauwelier  

©2016  Peter  Cauwelier  

©2016  Peter  Cauwelier  

©2016  Peter  Cauwelier  

                         personal  best  

 Max  Morinière    10.09  s  Daniel  Sangouma    10.02  s  Jean-­‐Charles  Trouabal    10.09  s  Bruno  Marie-­‐Rose    10.16  s    Sum      40.36  s    WORLD  RECORD    37.79  s    

                 personal  best    Calvin  Smith    9.93  s  Carl  Lewis    9.86  s  Sam  Graddy    10.08  s  Ron  Brown    10.01  s    Sum      39.88  s    WORLD  RECORD    37.83  s  

     men’s  4x100  m  relay  

©2016  Peter  Cauwelier  

©2016  Peter  Cauwelier  

©2016  Peter  Cauwelier  

HIGH-­‐PERFORMANCE  TEAM

DYSFUNCTIONAL  TEAM ©2016  Peter  Cauwelier  

your  team  ?  

©2016  Peter  Cauwelier  

diversity  clear  roles  

open-­‐minded  

great  leader  

common  goal  

trust  open  communica[on  

common  vision  

shared  purpose  focus  on  common  tasks  

clear  expecta[ons  

dealing  with  tensions  

construc[ve  cri[cism  

there  is  no  I  in  team  

mutual  respect  

team  atmosphere  

fun  

©2016  Peter  Cauwelier  

©2016  Peter  Cauwelier  

TEAM  PSYCHOLOGICAL  SAFETY  «  a  shared  understanding  by  members  in  a  team    that  the  team  is  safe  for  interpersonal  risk  taking  »  

©2016  Peter  Cauwelier   Prof.  Amy  Edmondson

Team  psychological  

safety   ?  

Team  performance

©2016  Peter  Cauwelier  

Learning  leads  to  performance  …

©2016  Peter  Cauwelier  

©2016  Peter  Cauwelier  

©2016  Peter  Cauwelier  

Kolb’s  cycle  of  experien[al  learning  

©2016  Peter  Cauwelier  

©2016  Peter  Cauwelier  

©2016  Peter  Cauwelier  

(Edmondson,  A.  C.  2003)

Team  psychological  

safety  Team  learning   Team  

performance

©2016  Peter  Cauwelier  

So  what  is    “Team  Psychological  Safety”  

 ?  

©2016  Peter  Cauwelier  

Maslov’s    Hierarchy  of  needs

©2016  Peter  Cauwelier  

From  …    psychological  safety  for  the  individual      …  to  …      psychological  safety  at  the  level  of  the  group            Team  Psychological  Safety      

     “a  shared  belief  held  by  members  of  a  team  that  the  team  is  safe  for      interpersonal  risk  taking”                  (Edmondson,  A.  C.  1999)  

Peter  Cauwelier  

Team  Psychological  Safety  is    a  shared  belief  held  by  members  of  a  team  that  the  team  is  safe  for  

interpersonal  risk  taking

LOW        Team  Psychological  Safety      HIGH

©2016  Peter  Cauwelier  

TEAM  PSYCHOLOGICAL  

SAFETY  

 If  you  make  a  mistake  on  this  team,  it  is  not  really  held  against  you.      Members  of  this  team  are  able  to  bring  up  problems  and  tough  issues.      People  on  this  team  never  reject  others  for  being  different.      It  is  safe  to  take  a  risk  on  this  team.      It  is  easy  to  ask  other  members  of  this  team  for  help.      No  one  on  this  team  would  deliberately  act  in  a  way  that  undermines          my  efforts.    Working  with  members  of  this  team,  my  unique  skills  and  talents  are      valued  and  uXlized.  

   1    2    3    4    5    6    7      1    2    3    4    5    6    7      1    2    3    4    5    6    7      1    2    3    4    5    6    7      1    2    3    4    5    6    7      1    2    3    4    5    6    7      1    2    3    4    5    6    7    

REACTION  TO  MISTAKES  

DEALING  WITH  ISSUES  

ACCEPTING  DIVERSITY  

TAKING  RISKS    

ASKING  FOR  HELP    

MUTUAL  SUPPORT    

APPRECIATION    

©2016  Peter  Cauwelier  

REACTION  TO  MISTAKES  

DEAL  WITH  ISSUES    

ACCEPTING  DIVERSITY  

TAKING  RISKS    

ASKING  FOR  HELP    

MUTUAL  SUPPORT    

APPRECIATION    

HIGH  TEAM    

PSYCHOLOGICAL  SAFETY

LOW  TEAM    

PSYCHOLOGICAL  SAFETY

1                      2                      3                      4                      5                      6                      7        

YOUR  TEAM  ?  YOUR  TEAM  ?  

REACTION  TO  MISTAKES  

DEAL  WITH  ISSUES    

ACCEPTING  DIVERSITY  

TAKING  RISKS    

ASKING  FOR  HELP    

MUTUAL  SUPPORT    

APPRECIATION    ©2016  Peter  Cauwelier  

©2016  Peter  Cauwelier  

Medica[on  errors  Adop[on  of  new  cardiac  surgery  procedures

©2016  Peter  Cauwelier  

What  does    “Team  Learning”  

 look  like  ?  

©2016  Peter  Cauwelier  

Team  psychological  

safety  

Team  learning  behavior

Team  performance

What  are  the  LEARNING  BEHAVIORS  in  a  team  ?      

How  can  you  observe  if  a  team  is  learning  ?    What  do  people  in  a  team  actually  DO  that  leads  to  learning  ?  

                   

With  your  neighbours,  iden[fy  at  least  5  OBSERVABLE  TEAM  LEARNING  BEHAVIORS  …  

 

?

©2016  Peter  Cauwelier  

(Edmondson,  A.  C.  2003)

Team  psychological  

safety  

Team  learning  behavior

Team  performance

Team learning behaviors -  Asking for feedback -  Help seeking -  Speaking up about concerns/mistakes -  Reacting to innovative behavior -  Boundary spanning

©2016  Peter  Cauwelier  

Team  psychological  

safety  

Team  learning  behavior

Team  performance

Team learning behaviors -  Asking for feedback -  Help seeking -  Speaking up about concerns/mistakes -  Reacting to innovative behavior -  Boundary spanning

An  obvious  link  between    team  learning  behavior  and  AcXon  Learning  

quesXons  and          ideas,  insights  reflecXon                                    -­‐>                    soluXons,  put  in  acXon  

   

Ac[on  Learning  process

+ +

©2016  Peter  Cauwelier  (Edmondson,  A.  C.  2003)

So  what  leads  to  the  development  of    Team  Psychological  Safety  

in  a  team  ?  

©2016  Peter  Cauwelier  

leader  behavior  

team  dynamics  

pracXce  

trust  and    respect  

supporXve  organizaXon  

TEAM  PSYCHOLOGICAL  

SAFETY  

©2016  Peter  Cauwelier  

leader  behavior  

team  dynamics  

pracXce  

trust  and    respect  

suppor[ve  organiza[on  

TEAM  PSYCHOLOGICAL  

SAFETY  

©2016  Peter  Cauwelier  

ease  of  access  to  resources  and  informaXon  reduces  the  level  of  insecurity  the  team  experiences  in  dealing  with  their  challenge  

leader  behavior  

team  dynamics  

pracXce  

trust  and    respect  

supporXve  organizaXon  

TEAM  PSYCHOLOGICAL  

SAFETY  

©2016  Peter  Cauwelier  

between  the  different  pairs  of  individuals  in  the  team  

leader  behavior  

team  dynamics  

pracXce  

trust  and    respect  

supporXve  organizaXon  

TEAM  PSYCHOLOGICAL  

SAFETY  

©2016  Peter  Cauwelier  

how  the  leader  uses  “power”  affects  the  psychological  safety  in  the  team,  and  further  impacts  …    +  the  team  climate  in  general  +  the  willingness  of  the  team  members  to  share  knowledge  +  moXvaXon  for  team  learning  

leader  behavior  

team  dynamics  

pracXce  

trust  and    respect  

supporXve  organizaXon  

TEAM  PSYCHOLOGICAL  

SAFETY  

©2016  Peter  Cauwelier  

interplay  of  roles  and  “characters”  that  people  assume  or  are  assigned  

leader  behavior  

team  dynamics  

prac[ce  

trust  and    respect  

supporXve  organizaXon  

TEAM  PSYCHOLOGICAL  

SAFETY  

©2016  Peter  Cauwelier  

prac[ce  fields  (or  managerial  learning  laboratories)    opportuniXes  for  teams  to  pracXce  and  to  reflect  upon  the  results,  rather  than  to  take  ‘real’  acXon  

   

©2016  Peter  Cauwelier  ©2016  Peter  Cauwelier  

leader  behavior  

team  dynamics  

prac[ce  

trust  and    respect  

supporXve  organizaXon  

TEAM  PSYCHOLOGICAL  

SAFETY  

©2016  Peter  Cauwelier  

?  

 Team  psychological  safety  as  a    

STATIC  CHARACTERISTIC    (a  ‘state’)  of  a  team  

Team  psychological  

safety  

Team  learning  behavior

Team  performance

Antecedents: - Leader behavior - Team dynamics - Trust and respect - Practice fields - Supportive organization

Team learning behaviors -  Asking for feedback -  Help seeking -  Speaking up about concerns/mistakes -  Reacting to innovative behavior -  Boundary spanning

“a shared belief held by members of a team that the team is safe for

interpersonal risk taking”

(Edmondson,  A.  C.  2003) ©2016  Peter  Cauwelier  

DYSFUNCTIONAL  TEAM

HIGH  TEAM    

PSYCHOLOGICAL    SAFETY

LOW  TEAM    

PSYCHOLOGICAL  SAFETY

HIGH-­‐PERFORMANCE  TEAM

©2016  Peter  Cauwelier  

How  can  we  ACCELERATE  the  development  of    

Team  Psychological  Safety    in  a  team  ?  

Team  psychological  

safety  

Team  learning  behavior

Team  performance

?

(Edmondson,  A.  C.  2003) ©2016  Peter  Cauwelier  

 You  have  been  asked  by  a  business  owner  to  work  with  his  team  of  7  direct  

reports.    

The  owner  has  evaluated  the  Team  Psychological  Safety  in  the  team,  and  wants  you  to  propose  an  approach  to  INCREASE  the  level  of  TPS  …  quickly.  

     

What  approach  do  you  propose  to  INCREASE  team  psychological  safety  in  …  ONLY  6  weeks  ?  

 Measuring  ajer  6  weeks,  where  do  you  expect  

to  see  CHANGES  ?        

Note:  the  business  owner  expects  a  “realis[c”  proposal,  in  terms  of  financial  engagement  as  well  as  team  [me  commitment.

©2016  Peter  Cauwelier  

TEAM  PSYCHOLOGICAL  

SAFETY  

 If  you  make  a  mistake  on  this  team,  it  is  not  really  held  against  you.      Members  of  this  team  are  able  to  bring  up  problems  and  tough  issues.      People  on  this  team  never  reject  others  for  being  different.      It  is  safe  to  take  a  risk  on  this  team.      It  is  easy  to  ask  other  members  of  this  team  for  help.      No  one  on  this  team  would  deliberately  act  in  a  way  that  undermines          my  efforts.    Working  with  members  of  this  team,  my  unique  skills  and  talents  are      valued  and  uXlized.  

   1    2    3    4    5    6    7      1    2    3    4    5    6    7      1    2    3    4    5    6    7      1    2    3    4    5    6    7      1    2    3    4    5    6    7      1    2    3    4    5    6    7      1    2    3    4    5    6    7    

REACTION  TO  MISTAKES  

DEALING  WITH  ISSUES  

ACCEPTING  DIVERSITY  

TAKING  RISKS    

ASKING  FOR  HELP    

MUTUAL  SUPPORT    

APPRECIATION    

©2016  Peter  Cauwelier  

0%  

10%  

20%  

30%  

40%  

50%  

60%  

70%  

80%  

strongly  disagree  

disagree   disagree  somewhat  

undecided   agree  somewhat  

agree   strongly  agree  

©2016  Peter  Cauwelier  

TEAM  PSYCHOLOGICAL  

SAFETY  

REACTION  TO  MISTAKES  

DEAL  WITH  ISSUES    

ACCEPTING  DIVERSITY  

TAKING  RISKS    

ASKING  FOR  HELP    

MUTUAL  SUPPORT    

APPRECIATION    

Average  5.3    

Standard  deviaXon  1.2

An  experiment  with  Ac[on  Learning  

   

“A  problem  solving  process  with  a  small  group  working  on  real  problems,  taking  acXon,  and  learning  as  individuals  and  as  a  

team  while  doing  so.”    

©2016  Peter  Cauwelier  

Six  components  of  an  Ac[on  Learning  session  …  !

©2016  Peter  Cauwelier  

Team  psychological  

safety  

Team  learning  behavior

Team  performance

Team learning behaviors -  Asking for feedback -  Help seeking -  Speaking up about concerns/mistakes -  Reacting to innovative behavior -  Boundary spanning

quesXoning  and          ideas,  insights  reflecXng                                      -­‐>                    soluXons,  put  in  acXon  

   

Ac[on  Learning  process

?

++

©2016  Peter  Cauwelier  

How  does  AcXon  Learning  impact  team  psychological  safety?  

leader  behavior  

team  dynamics  

pracXce  

trust  and    respect  

supporXve  organizaXon  

TEAM  PSYCHOLOGICAL  

SAFETY  

©2016  Peter  Cauwelier  

asking  quesXons,  building  on  each  other’s  ideas  and  reflecXng  on  the  team’s  dynamics  increases  the  trust  and  respect  among  team  members  

How  does  AcXon  Learning  impact  team  psychological  safety?  

leader  behavior  

team  dynamics  

pracXce  

trust  and    respect  

supporXve  organizaXon  

TEAM  PSYCHOLOGICAL  

SAFETY  

©2016  Peter  Cauwelier  

the  leader  ‘empowers’  the  team  to  propose  soluXons  to  a  problem  and  to  implement  them  

How  does  AcXon  Learning  impact  team  psychological  safety?  

leader  behavior  

team  dynamics  

pracXce  

trust  and    respect  

supporXve  organizaXon  

TEAM  PSYCHOLOGICAL  

SAFETY  

©2016  Peter  Cauwelier  

acXon  learning  ensures  parXcipaXon  from  everyone  in  a  focused  but  relaXvely  stress-­‐free  context  

How  does  AcXon  Learning  impact  team  psychological  safety?  

leader  behavior  

team  dynamics  

prac[ce  

trust  and    respect  

supporXve  organizaXon  

TEAM  PSYCHOLOGICAL  

SAFETY  

©2016  Peter  Cauwelier  

     REAL    CHALLENGE(s)  

the  acXon  learning  process  looks  at  different  opXons  in  a  meeXng  semng,  before  confirming  the  validity  in  acXons  aoer  the  session  

   

How  does  AcXon  Learning  impact  team  psychological  safety?  

Team  psychological  

safety  

Team  learning  behavior

Team  performance

Team learning behaviors -  Asking for feedback -  Help seeking -  Speaking up about concerns/mistakes -  Reacting to innovative behavior -  Boundary spanning

quesXoning  and          ideas,  insights  reflecXng                                      -­‐>                    soluXons,  put  in  acXon  

   

Ac[on  Learning  process

?

++

©2016  Peter  Cauwelier  

How  does  AcXon  Learning  impact  team  psychological  safety?  

Management  team  in  a  Thailand  manufacturing  plant    

 7  Thais  (excluding  Managing  Director  -­‐  French)    seniority  from  1  to  10  years    age  from  30  to  45  years    finance,  sales,  quality,  customer  service,  IT,  purchasing,  QA  

   3  women,  4  men    different  hierarchical  levels  (managers  and  the  level  just  below)      

   challenge  addressed:  reducing  total  factory  inventory  level    

 3  AcXon  Learning  sessions,  2  weeks  apart,  with  external  coach      

!!!!!!!

©2016  Peter  Cauwelier  

CASE  1

AFTERBEFORE

Average  5.3    

Standard  deviaXon  1.2

©2016  Peter  Cauwelier  

Average  5.6    

Standard  deviaXon  0.7

0%  

10%  

20%  

30%  

40%  

50%  

60%  

70%  

80%  

strongly  disagree  

(1)  

disagree  (2)  

disagree  somewhat  

(3)  

undecided  (4)  

agree  somewhat  

(5)  

agree  (6)   strongly  agree  (7)  

0%  

10%  

20%  

30%  

40%  

50%  

60%  

70%  

80%  

strongly  disagree  

(1)  

disagree  (2)  

disagree  somewhat  

(3)  

undecided  (4)  

agree  somewhat  

(5)  

agree  (6)   strongly  agree  (7)  

AFTERBEFORE

“If  you  make  a  mistake  on  this  team,  it  is  not  really  held  

against  you”  

©2016  Peter  Cauwelier  

REACTION  TO  MISTAKES  

DEAL  WITH  ISSUES    

ACCEPTING  DIVERSITY  

TAKING  RISKS    

ASKING  FOR  HELP    

MUTUAL  SUPPORT    

APPRECIATION    

REACTION  TO  MISTAKES  

DEAL  WITH  ISSUES    

ACCEPTING  DIVERSITY  

TAKING  RISKS    

ASKING  FOR  HELP    

MUTUAL  SUPPORT    

APPRECIATION    

Average  4.7  

Standard  deviaXon  1.5

Average  5.7  

Standard  deviaXon  0.8

“It  is  easy  to  ask  other  members  of  this  team  for  

help.”  

Average  5.3  

Standard  deviaXon  1.7

Average  5.7  

Standard  deviaXon  0.7

Supervisor  team  in  a  Thailand  service  organizaXon    

 7  Thais    seniority  from  1  to  20  years    age  from  25  to  50  years    markeXng,  operaXons,  accounXng  

   6  women,  1  man    supervisors  in  all  departments        challenge  addressed:  reducing  employee  turnover  

   4  AcXon  Learning  sessions,  1  week  apart,  with  external  coach      

!!!!!!

©2016  Peter  Cauwelier  

CASE  2

!

BEFORE AFTER

©2016  Peter  Cauwelier  

Average  6.3    

Standard  deviaXon  1.1

Average  6.8    

Standard  deviaXon  0.4

0%  

10%  

20%  

30%  

40%  

50%  

60%  

70%  

80%  

strongly  disagree  

(1)  

disagree  (2)  

disagree  somewhat  

(3)  

undecided  (4)  

agree  somewhat  

(5)  

agree  (6)   strongly  agree  (7)  

0%  

10%  

20%  

30%  

40%  

50%  

60%  

70%  

80%  

strongly  disagree  

(1)  

disagree  (2)  

disagree  somewhat  

(3)  

undecided  (4)  

agree  somewhat  

(5)  

agree  (6)   strongly  agree  (7)  

Back  office  team  in  a  Membership  OrganizaXon    

 5  Thais    seniority  from  2  to  10  years    age  from  30  to  45  years    accounXng,  human  resources,  membership,  event  organizaXon        4  women,  1  man          challenge  addressed:  ensuring  members  renew  

   4  AcXon  Learning  sessions,  2  weeks  apart,  with  external  coach      

!!!!!

©2016  Peter  Cauwelier  

CASE  3

BEFORE AFTER

©2016  Peter  Cauwelier  

Average  5.7    

Standard  deviaXon  1.4

Average  5.9    

Standard  deviaXon  1.1

0%  

10%  

20%  

30%  

40%  

50%  

60%  

70%  

80%  

strongly  disagree  

(1)  

disagree  (2)  

disagree  somewhat  

(3)  

undecided  (4)  

agree  somewhat  

(5)  

agree    (6)   strongly  agree  (7)  

0%  

10%  

20%  

30%  

40%  

50%  

60%  

70%  

80%  

strongly  disagree  

(1)  

disagree  (2)  

disagree  somewhat  

(3)  

undecided  (4)  

agree  somewhat  

(5)  

agree    (6)   strongly  agree  (7)  

Managers  in  Professional  Service  OrganizaXon    

 6  Thais    seniority  from  2  to  10  years    age  from  30  to  40  years    audit,  accounXng,  payroll,  legal  services        5  women,  1  man          challenge  addressed:  improving  performance  evalua[on  

   5  AcXon  Learning  sessions,  2-­‐3  weeks  apart,  with  external  coach      

!!!!!

©2016  Peter  Cauwelier  

CASE  4

!

BEFORE AFTER

©2016  Peter  Cauwelier  

Average  5.9    

Standard  deviaXon  1.1

Average  5.8    

Standard  deviaXon  1.0

0%  

10%  

20%  

30%  

40%  

50%  

60%  

70%  

80%  

strongly  disagree  

(1)  

disagree  (2)  

disagree  somewhat  

(3)  

undecided  (4)  

agree  somewhat  

(5)  

agree  (6)   strongly  agree  (7)  

0%  

10%  

20%  

30%  

40%  

50%  

60%  

70%  

80%  

strongly  disagree  

(1)  

disagree  (2)  

disagree  somewhat  

(3)  

undecided  (4)  

agree  somewhat  

(5)  

agree  (6)   strongly  agree  (7)  

Team  psychological  

safety  

Team  learning  behavior

Team  performance

Team learning behaviors -  Asking for feedback -  Help seeking -  Speaking up about concerns/mistakes -  Reacting to innovative behavior -  Boundary spanning

quesXoning  and          ideas,  insights  reflecXng                                      -­‐>                    soluXons,  put  in  acXon  

   

Ac[on  Learning  PROCESSAc[on  Learning    CONTEXT

+

   AcXon  Learning  has  a    DOUBLE  impact  on  the  team:    

 (1)  the  PROCESS  of  quesXons/reflecXon  help  the  team  to  learn  and  solve      the  problem(s)  …  leading  to  higher  performance    (2)  the  CONTEXT  created  enhances  the  psychological  safety  in  the  team,  which  in        turn  posiXvely  impacts  the  effecXveness  of  the  team  learning  

   

   

++

©2016  Peter  Cauwelier  

Team  Psychological  Safety      

 what  Google  discovered  about  high-­‐performance  

teams  

TEAM  PSYCHOLOGICAL  SAFETY  «  a  shared  understanding  by  members  in  a  team    that  the  team  is  safe  for  interpersonal  risk  taking  »  

©2016  Peter  Cauwelier  

DYSFUNCTIONAL  TEAM

HIGH  TEAM    

PSYCHOLOGICAL    SAFETY

LOW  TEAM    

PSYCHOLOGICAL  SAFETY

HIGH-­‐PERFORMANCE  TEAM

©2016  Peter  Cauwelier  

YOUR  TEAM  

1                      2                      3                      4                      5                      6                      7        

When  working  on    

TEAM  PERFORMANCE  think  about  what  you  can  do  to      

ACCELERATE  the  development  of    

TEAM  PSYCHOLOGICAL  SAFETY  

ACCELERATING  the  development  of    

TEAM  PSYCHOLOGICAL  SAFETY  

Team  psychological  

safety  

Team  learning  behavior

Team  performance

Ac[on  Learning    

Peer  coaching/mentoring  ?  

MBTI  ?  FIRO  ?  Belbin  ?  

Team  Building  ?  

(Edmondson,  A.  C.  2003) ©2016  Peter  Cauwelier  

«  There  is  no  learning  without  ac[on,  and  there  is  no  ac[on  without  learning.  »  

Reginald  Revans  

©2016  Peter  Cauwelier