personal online reputation: the development of an approach to investigate how personal reputation is...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Personal online reputation: the development of an approach to investigate how personal reputation is evaluated and managed in online environments](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070513/58865d061a28ab26598b639d/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Personal online reputation:The development of an approach to investigate
how personal reputation is evaluated andmanaged in online environments
by Frances VC Ryan
Presentation delivered at the International Data and Information Management Conference
13th January 2016, Loughborough, England
Co-authors: Peter Cruickshank, Professor Hazel Hall, and Alistair Lawson
[email protected] | @cleverfrances | www.JustAPhD.com
1
![Page 2: Personal online reputation: the development of an approach to investigate how personal reputation is evaluated and managed in online environments](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070513/58865d061a28ab26598b639d/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Overview of presentation
Brief overview of the research themes Theoretical framework for empirical work Evaluation of potential methods Pilot testing chosen method Findings from pilot Conclusion and next steps
1 21 2
![Page 3: Personal online reputation: the development of an approach to investigate how personal reputation is evaluated and managed in online environments](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070513/58865d061a28ab26598b639d/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
What’s the research about?
How online information contributes to the building, maintenance, and evaluation of personal reputations
― Personal reputation: Private individuals, rather than corporate identity and brand
Two broad research themes: (1) The means by which people evaluate or assess the personal reputations of others from the online evidence available to them
(2) How people manage their own personal reputations through their use of online information, and to what extent those behaviours are intentional
1 2 31 2 3
![Page 4: Personal online reputation: the development of an approach to investigate how personal reputation is evaluated and managed in online environments](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070513/58865d061a28ab26598b639d/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Developing a theoretical framework for empirical work
Difficult: What literature should be considered?
1. General materials related to research themes across many domains(e.g. Human resources, marketing, information systems,
physical and mental health)
2. Specific material on academic reputations evident in citation analysis
3. Contextual material from everyday life information seeking (ELIS) studies
1 2 3 41 2 3 4
![Page 5: Personal online reputation: the development of an approach to investigate how personal reputation is evaluated and managed in online environments](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070513/58865d061a28ab26598b639d/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Developing a theoretical framework for empirical work
Difficult: Which literature should be considered?
1. General materials related to research themes across many domains(e.g. Human resources, marketing, information systems,
physical and mental health)
2. Specific material on academic reputations evident in citation analysis
3. Contextual material from everyday life information seeking (ELIS) studies
1 2 3 4
Lots of options:- Quantitative - Qualitative
1 2 3 4
![Page 6: Personal online reputation: the development of an approach to investigate how personal reputation is evaluated and managed in online environments](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070513/58865d061a28ab26598b639d/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Developing a theoretical framework for empirical work
Difficult: Which literature should be considered?
1. General materials related to research themes across many domains(e.g. Human resources, marketing, information systems,
physical and mental health)
2. Specific material on academic reputations evident in citation analysis
3. Contextual material from everyday life information seeking (ELIS) studies
1 2 3 4
Mostly Quantitative
1 2 3 4
![Page 7: Personal online reputation: the development of an approach to investigate how personal reputation is evaluated and managed in online environments](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070513/58865d061a28ab26598b639d/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Developing a theoretical framework for empirical work
Difficult: Which literature should be considered?
1. General materials related to research themes across many domains(e.g. Human resources, marketing, information systems,
physical and mental health)
2. Specific material on academic reputations evident in citation analysis
3. Contextual material from everyday life information seeking (ELIS) studies
1 2 3 4
Largely Qualitative
1 2 3 4
![Page 8: Personal online reputation: the development of an approach to investigate how personal reputation is evaluated and managed in online environments](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070513/58865d061a28ab26598b639d/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
How best to investigate both research themes?
The challenge? Establishing a way to examine both research themes simultaneously
Qualitative methods deemed most appropriate
Semi-structured, in-depth interviews to discuss participants’ own practices
Answering questions on evaluation of others proved more difficult
Four potential solutions …
1 2 3 4 5 6 71 2 3 4 5
![Page 9: Personal online reputation: the development of an approach to investigate how personal reputation is evaluated and managed in online environments](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070513/58865d061a28ab26598b639d/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Option 1: Profile mock-ups
Create false user profiles
Information mimics situations from literature
Participants review mock-ups
Interviews to discuss how reputations are evaluated
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 81 2 3 4 5 6
© W
ireframeS
ketcher
© PitchStock
![Page 10: Personal online reputation: the development of an approach to investigate how personal reputation is evaluated and managed in online environments](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070513/58865d061a28ab26598b639d/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Option 2: Participant screen shots
Screen shots of participants’ online profiles
Others evaluate the reputations of each other based on the screen shots
Interviews to discuss how reputations are evaluated
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
© Frances Ryan
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
![Page 11: Personal online reputation: the development of an approach to investigate how personal reputation is evaluated and managed in online environments](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070513/58865d061a28ab26598b639d/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Option 3: Observation
Participants discuss evaluation of others during interview
Participants interacting with social media accounts with interviewer present
Ethical issues regarding consent from participants’ connections
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
© Jason Jenkins
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
![Page 12: Personal online reputation: the development of an approach to investigate how personal reputation is evaluated and managed in online environments](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070513/58865d061a28ab26598b639d/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Option 4: Diaries and interviews
Participants keep diary for one week
Simple instructions regarding what to write about
No formatting guidelines
After diary, participants take part in a semi-structured interview
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
© Frances Ryan
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
![Page 13: Personal online reputation: the development of an approach to investigate how personal reputation is evaluated and managed in online environments](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070513/58865d061a28ab26598b639d/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Best option: Diaries and interviews
Tradition in everyday life information seeking (ELIS) research
Rich data are reliable sources of information and eliminate the potential for inaccurate reporting
(Narayan, Case, & Edwards, 2011, p. 3)
Several studies use a combination of diary-keeping and interviews (Agosto & Hughes-Hassell, 2005; Dervin, 1983; McKenzie, 2003; Rieh, 2004)
Although studies vary, they share a common theme: combining the robustness of two forms of data
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
![Page 14: Personal online reputation: the development of an approach to investigate how personal reputation is evaluated and managed in online environments](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070513/58865d061a28ab26598b639d/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Testing the methods
Pilot study to test methods and process
Eight participants
Popular social networking sites
Participant diaries Participants kept diary for one week as they engaged with their social media accounts
Interviews After completing diaries, participants took part in hour-long, semi-structured interviews
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 111 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
![Page 15: Personal online reputation: the development of an approach to investigate how personal reputation is evaluated and managed in online environments](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070513/58865d061a28ab26598b639d/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Findings
Two-part data collection method was a success
Participants were more aware of their actions and behaviours
Not a burdensome amount of work for participants
Produced a robust data set for analysis
Helped to identify minor changes for main study
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 131 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
![Page 16: Personal online reputation: the development of an approach to investigate how personal reputation is evaluated and managed in online environments](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070513/58865d061a28ab26598b639d/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Appropriateness of methods confirmed
Range of insights for main study
Helped to re-format interview guides and coding system
Early indications show new themes emerging
Pilot success!
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
© Sarah Reid
![Page 17: Personal online reputation: the development of an approach to investigate how personal reputation is evaluated and managed in online environments](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070513/58865d061a28ab26598b639d/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Next steps
Main empirical work
Sample of 45+ participants
Gen Y, Gen X, and Boomers
Data analysis
Thesis write-up
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
© Frances Ryan
© Frances Ryan
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
![Page 18: Personal online reputation: the development of an approach to investigate how personal reputation is evaluated and managed in online environments](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070513/58865d061a28ab26598b639d/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Slide 6: Creative commons copyright (1) WireframeSketcher (wireframesketcher.com/mockups) (2) PitchStock (www.behance.net)
Slide 7: Copyright Frances VC Ryan
Slide 8: Creative commons copyright Jason Jenkins (www.flickr.com/jdub1980)
Slide 9: Copyright Frances VC Ryan
Slide 13: Creative commons copyright Sarah Reid (www.flickr.com/sarahreido)
Slide 14: Copyright Frances VC Ryan
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Copyright attributions
![Page 19: Personal online reputation: the development of an approach to investigate how personal reputation is evaluated and managed in online environments](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070513/58865d061a28ab26598b639d/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Thank you!
[email protected]@cleverfrances
www.JustAPhD.com+44(0)7530 696549
Slides available at: www.slideshare.net/justfrances
© Frances Ryan