six sigma for auditors tctc 2017 - eiseverywhere.com to identifying and correcting root causes of...
TRANSCRIPT
Six Sigma for Auditors TCTC 2017
September 25, 2017
Agenda What is Six Sigma and Lean Lean Six Sigma and the IIA’s IPPF DMAIC and phases of an audit Identification of Waste Process Capability Control Charts and Histograms Value Stream Mapping Cause and Effect Tools Poka-Yokes
What is Six Sigma
Developed by Motorola in 1986 Business management strategy focused on
eliminating defects and minimizing variability A “Six Sigma” process in one in which
99.99966 percent of results are free of defects Defect defined as any process that does not
meet customer specifications, or could lead to an output that doesn’t meet customer specifications
Six Sigma Defect Rates 3 Sigma Level 6 Sigma Level
8.1 million wrong drug prescriptions year worldwide
10,000 wrong drug prescriptions a year worldwide
11,000 newborn babies accidently dropped in hospitals in USA yearly
13 newborn babies dropped yearly
6 short or long landings at Atlanta airport daily
Three short or long landings at Atlanta airport yearly
500 incorrect surgical operations each week
1 incorrect surgical operation every 2 weeks
Six Sigma Concepts Critical to Quality: Attributes most important
to the customer Defect: Failing to deliver what the customer
wants Process Capability: What your process can
deliver Variation: What the customer sees and feels.
Should be reduced and results in stable operations and predictability
Lean Principles
Set of tools that help identify and eliminate waste. As waste is eliminated, quality improves and
production time and cost are lowered Waste is anything that doesn’t add value to
the product. Identifies problem areas and bottlenecks
Six Sigma vs. Lean Six sigma is about eliminating anything that does not meet
customer needs i.e. defects Very statistical and numbers driven Lean is about eliminating waste and ensuring that
everything we do adds value to the customer Combined they are about using tools that enable your
organization to take a more accurate and quantitative approach to identifying and correcting root causes of problems
The goal of all Lean Six Sigma and internal audit projects is to improve internal controls by avoiding expenses that add no value to the organization
Lean Six Sigma and The IPPF Standards
Lean Six Sigma’s purpose is to improve the business processes that support an organization’s operations
Internal audit must evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of risk management, control, and governance processes
Standard 2100-Nature of Work states Internal Audit should use a systematic and disciplined approach
Standard 2200-Engagment Planning requires that objectives, scope, timing, and resource allocations should be based upon adequate information and analysis of the process
Lean Six Sigma and The Audit Process
Lean Six Sigma project methodology follows the DMAIC improvement Model and can be related to the 5 phases of an internal Audit
Define the problem-Pre Planning/Preliminary Survey Measure the key aspects of the process-Planning Analyze the data for cause and effect relationships-
Fieldwork/Execution/Testing Improve the process-Reporting/Recommendations Control the Future state-Follow-up/Remediation
Waste Waiting: Machine downtown, bottlenecked operations,
approvals from others, system down time, sitting in queue Extra Processing: Unneeded steps, re-entering data, extra
copies, unnecessary or excessive reports Defects: Production of defective parts, scrap, data input
errors, design errors Inventory: Any excess inventory, batch processing Excess motion: Any additional reaching, steps to copier,
handling something more than once Transportation: Move materials, parts, paperwork Underutilized Employees: Limited authority, ideas skills
Service Processes can be Full of Waste
Too many signatures Errors/typos Unclear process steps Waiting for info Too many meetings Poor office layouts Unnecessary emails Unclear job duties Obsolete databases Batching
Service Processes can be Full of Waste
Too many signatures Errors/typos Unclear process steps Waiting for info Too many meetings Poor office layouts Unnecessary emails Unclear job duties Obsolete databases Batching
Spaghetti Diagram
Shows the flow of information, materials, and/or people Often shows an unexpectedly high amount
of walking, carrying, waiting, etc Criss-crossing lines may indicate handoffs
which often add delays and wait time Can be used to improve the layout of the
office for better work flow
Spaghetti Diagram
Process Capability The capability of a process to meet its
purpose All processes have inherent statistical
variability Need to determine not just that the
process is meeting desired goal, but what specifications the process can meet Need to identify bottlenecks and variations
in the process
Theory of Constraint A chain in no stronger than its weakest link Need to address the weakest link
(constraint) and look forward to the next constraint Helps to address the bottlenecks
(constraints)
Focusing Steps Identify the constraint Work to exploit the constraint or make
better Make other changes to break the constraint This will create new constraint which
causes process to start over Don’t let inertia become the constraint
Process Control Charts Graphs used to study how a process
changes over time Helps distinguish between normal and
unusual variations Always a central line for the average, an
upper line for the upper control unit and a lower line for the lower control unit Use the data to determine if the process
variation is in control or out of control
Benefits of Control Charts Focus attention of directing and monitoring
process variation over time Distinguish special from common causes of
variation Serve as a tool for ongoing control of a
process Help improve a process to perform
consistently and predictably for higher quality, efficiency, and lower cost
Out of Control Signals A single point outside the control limits Two out of three successive points are on
the same side of the centerline and farther than 2 sigmas from it Four out of five successive points are on
the same side of centerline and farther than 1 sigma from it A run of eight in a row on the same side of
the centerline
Histogram Helps to summarize data from a process that
has been collected over a period of time Shows the relative frequency of occurrence of
the various data points and distribution of data Shows outliers that can indicate out of control
processes Helps answers the question “Is the process
capable of meeting customer requirements?”
Value Stream vs. Flowchart
• Quantification-VSM shows the amount of time consumed by tasks as well as specific transactional information
• Value-how value flows through the process from the customer’s perspective
• Pre-scheduling activities to ensure follow-ups are conducted within goals.
Value Stream Map
Value
Value adding (VA)-creates the product, service attributes and features the customer desires Business value-adding (BVA)-often hidden
from the customer but necessary to ensure the product or service meets requirements (IT systems, inspection activities, etc) Nonvalue-adding (NVA)- completely
unnecessary and should be eliminated
Cause and Effect Tools
Fishbone Diagram 5 Whys Pareto Charts Impact/Difficulty Matrix
Fishbone Diagram Problems typically are not simple. They
often involve the complex interaction among several causes Displays the major causes, sub-causes, and
root causes Provide a focus for discussion and
consensus Visualize the possible relationships among
causes
Fishbone Diagram
Five Whys Simple technique to get beyond the
symptoms of a problem and uncover root cause Why are we late? The copier jammed Why did the copier jam? Paper is Moist Why is the paper moist? High humidity Why is there high humidity? Ventilation is
poor Why is ventilation poor? Filter is dirty
Pareto Chart
A large percent of errors or defects in any process is usually caused by few problems Usually 80% of the quality issues can be
corrected by eliminating 20% of root causes Helps identify the significant few problems
so we can target them for action Use the chart to draw attention and
cooperation to attack the most important issues
Pareto Chart
Impact/Difficulty Matrix Key Projects Impact Difficulty
Resolve software issues 10 1
Design Recruiting Process 10 4
Create Customer Dockets 7 4
Plan for Market Presence 4 3
Replace Truck Fleet 3 1
Pricing Process for Custom 5 2
Poka-Yokes
Japanese for “Fail-safing” or “Mistake proofing” Ensure proper conditions exist to prevent a
mistake Help to process work right the first time Usually put into place after other tools have
found issues and help correct problems
Examples of Poka-Yokes
Locks on airline lavatory doors that active lights inside Indented trays used by surgeons to ensure no
instruments are left in patient Color coding forms to make it easy to pick out
an error All fields in an application entry screen must
be completed to move forward
Lean Six Sigma at INPRS Quality Management Team is training several
people in the organization on methodology 9 days of training Ran projects that are being ran to improve
business processes Internal Audit is participating in each project
to ensure that controls are not eliminated Continuing team that focuses on process
improvement
Lean in Audit
Everyone in the department has been trained in Lean Sigma methodology One Black belt and One Green belt in the
department All audits include some sort of process
improvement ascpect
Lean in Audit
Review metrics and analyze where issues reside using more data than previous audit methodology Utilize other tools, such as control charts,
histograms, fishbone diagrams, pareto charts, etc to determine where waste and root causes reside
Lean Six Sigma Benefits More efficient and effective processes Improved process quality output Ability to drive improvements and reduce process
waste A better understanding of customer requirements Increased customer satisfaction and value More robust products and processes Improved delivery and quality performance Critical process inputs needed to respond to
changing customer requirements
Lean Six Sigma Challenges
Getting management and employee buy-in Time and resources needed to execute
process improvement projects/initiatives Training required Data needed
Questions?
Teresa Snedigar Chief Audit and Risk Officer
Indiana Public Retirement Systems [email protected]
317-234-5681