pdf (4.39 mb)

129

aapsArchives ofAesthetic Plastic Surgery

REVIEW ARTICLE

http://dx.doi.org/10.14730/aaps.2014.20.3.129Arch Aesthetic Plast Surg 2014;20(3):129-139pISSN: 2234-0831 eISSN: 2288-9337

Comprehensive Review of Asian Cosmetic Upper Eyelid Oculoplastic Surgery: Asian Blepharoplasty and the Like

INTRODUCTIONThe field of Asian Aesthetic Oculoplastic Surgery is a rapidly grow-ing area – with upper eyelid blepharoplasty ranking as the most commonly performed procedure in Asian aesthetic surgery. The main objective of this article is to provide simplification and

reorganization to the surgical procedures of this topic, namely su-pratarsal crease surgery and epicanthoplasty techniques. In addition, a recommendation for unified terminology and an enhanced expla-nation of the aesthetic goals of the procedures will be offered. This paper will also evaluate some of the advantages and disadvantages of various surgical approaches in an objective fashion, based on ana-tomic and physiological criteria of the individual patient at hand. The imprecise use of terminologies in Asian Aesthetic Oculo-plastic Surgery has always been a problem with doctor/patient in-teraction. This leads to miscommunication, unrealized expecta-tions, and suboptimal results. Because the Asian languages inher-ently have the capacity to hold multiple meanings even within the same word, there is an even greater importance in using unified language to optimize doctor/patient communication (Table 1). Too often, complications occur due to faulty primary surgery based on incorrect concepts and choices. Although the choice in

Suzie H. Chang1, William P. Chen2, In Chang Cho3, Tae Joo Ahn4

1Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center and Veterans Affairs North Texas Health Care System, Dallas, Texas; 2Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, California, USA; 3BIO Plastic Surgery Clinic, Seoul; 4Gyalumhan Plastic Surgery, Seoul, Korea

Background Asian Aesthetic Oculoplastic Surgery is a fast-growing field, both within the United States and abroad. With growing interest, there have also been multiple terminologies used for the same concepts. This has created redundant and confusing language - prone to errors in patient-physician communication. In addition, there has been an upsurge of various techniques or variations to existing techniques that has created unnecessary confusion among plastic surgeons. The objective of this article is to provide organization and simplification to the terminology and to the techniques used in what some broadly refer to as “Asian Blepharoplasty” or perhaps more cor-rectly termed Asian Aesthetic Oculoplastic Surgery.Methods Unified terminology, aesthetic goal and detailed operative technique of com-monly conducted Asian blepharoplasty were suggested by experienced oculoplastic surgeons.Results The main procedures of Asian Aesthetic Oculoplastic Surgery including supra-tarsal crease surgery and medial epicanthoplasty were presented with figure and video in this paper. We also have provided author’s preferred selection of the major tech-niques with evaluation of its advantages and disadvantages.Conclusions The most important element in patient satisfaction is clear communica-tion of surgical expectations. Then, proper selection of the most suitable pre-operative design, type of surgery performed, and specific crease configuration based on the indi-vidual’s anatomic and physiological characteristics can be achieved.

Keywords Asian blepharoplasty, Asian oculoplastic surgery, Epicanthoplasty, Supratar-sal crease, Double eyelidplasty

None of the authors has a financial interest in any of the products, devices, or drugs men-tioned in this manuscript.

Received: Oct 21, 2014 Revised: Oct 25, 2014 Accepted: Oct 26, 2014Correspondence: Suzie H. Chang Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Veterans Affairs North Texas Health Care System, VISN 17, 1801 Inwood Rd., Dallas, TX 75390, USA.E-mail: [email protected] © 2014 The Korean Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons At-tribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. www.e-aaps.org

130

aaps Archives ofAesthetic Plastic Surgery VOLUME 20. NUMBER 3. OCTOBER 2014

terminology may seem to be a minor detail, these are challenging issues when handling patient complaints and suboptimal results in revisional cases. Therefore, it is critical to surgical success to clearly communicate expectations and desires of the patient at the first op-portunity.

ANATOMICAL BASIS OF ASIAN AESTHETIC OCULOPLASTIC SURGERYThe anatomical basis of Asian Aesthetic Oculoplastic Surgery re-volves around two unique entities, the supratarsal crease and the epicanthal fold. The absence and presence of these two entities dis-tinguishes the aesthetics of the Asian eye from other ethnicities.

Anatomy and etiology of supratarsal creaseHistorically, the most commonly used explanation on the etiology of the supratarsal crease is commonly explained by the Levator Ex-pansion Theory - where the levator aponeurosis sends distal inser-tions into the overlying dermis of the upper eyelid skin approximate-ly at the level of the superior border of the tarsal plate [1]. However, there have been more recent microanatomic studies that demonstrate how the levator sends distal insertions to overly-ing orbicularis oculi muscle and subcutaneous tissues, not into the dermis itself [2]. In addition, the general consensus of updated thou-ght is that the contributing factors to the upper lid without a supra-tarsal crease are the increased thickness of skin, the increase in sub-orbicularis adipose tissue, the variance in fusional height of the or-bital septum and levator aponeurosis, the existence of a pretarsal fat pad, and the increase in preaponeurotic adipose tissues [3-6].

Anatomy and etiology of epicanthal foldMost Asian epicanthal folds can be categorized as the epicanthus tarsalis variant [7,8]. It is a normal anatomic entity unique to the Asian patient population and is not considered a deformity. The epicanthal fold is comprised of redundant skin, subcutaneous tis-sue, and a portion of the preseptal orbicularis oculi muscle. When the epicanthal fold is eliminated in the case of epicanthoplasty pro-cedures, there have been no functional deficits found [9]. There have been several anatomical studies published showing

the composition of the epicanthal fold [5]. It is located nasally be-tween the upper and lower eyelid, at an epicenter of opposing skin tension vectors. When the upper eyelid opens through the action of the levator muscle and aponeurosis, it is noted that the medial skin of the upper eyelid moves in a superolateral direction and the lateral upper eyelid skin moves in a superomedial direction [10]. (Fig. 1). These vectors of upper eyelid skin tension are more pro-nounced when the eyelid is open rather than when closed. Addi-tionally, it is prudent to perform an epicanthoplasty procedure con-comitantly with a supratarsal crease surgery in order to eliminate and disperse these deterring forces from blunting the supratarsal crease formation.

SUPRATRASAL CREASE SURGERYThe first known published account of the Asian supratarsal crease procedure is in the Japanese literature. In 1896, Mikamo published a suture technique to creating the supratarsal crease [11]. In 1929, Maruo reported the first incisional method [12]. Since then, there have been numerous publications on variations and combinations of these two techniques [13-18], including laser application [19] and the use of microsurgical mini-flaps [20]. There are distinct advantages and disadvantages to each tech-

Table 1. Terminology in Asian aesthetic oculoplastic surgery

Identity Current common terms Proposed term – Term used in this manuscript

Supratarsal crease creation surgery Asian blepharoplasty, double eyelid surgery, lid crease surgery, Asian upper lid procedure

Supratarsal crease surgery

Parallel oriented supratarsal crease “Outfold”, “outer-oriented” crease, parallel crease Parallel crease

Nasally tapered supratarsal crease “Infold”, “inner-oriented” crease, “unfolded fan” fold Nasally tapered crease

Epicanthal fold “Mongolian fold” Epicanthal fold

Hypertrophic orbicularis roll along lower lash line “Love-roll”

Microincisional buried suture technique Non-incisional, suture technique Minimal incision supratarsal crease surgery

Fig. 1. Skin tension vectors.

131

aaps Archives ofAesthetic Plastic SurgeryChang SH et al. Asian Blepharoplasty

Table 2. Incisional vs minimal incision techniques in supratarsal crease surgery

Incisional Minimal incision

Ideal patient All patients, especially useful in revision cases, thick-lid cases, or patients with dermatochalasis

Thin-lid patient

Advantages Direct visualization, can perform ptosis correction concomitantly, ability to perform selective tissue debulking, Better ability to control for hemostasis, Previse preservation/repositioning of preapoenurotic fat

Minimal external scarring, shorter recovery time

Disadvantages Longer recovery time, possibly greater learning curve Decreased visualization of tissues, more difficulty in creating a parallel-oriented crease (with disappearance of medial crease), permanent buried sutures placed, potential Faden Effect [30]

Complications Possibility of static crease deformity, asymmetry Suture failure (recurrence), suture erosion, suture palpability, asymmetry, partial crease formation, feeling of “strain” in eyelids

Fig. 3. Nasally-tapered configuration.

Fig. 2. Parallel configuration.

Fig. 4. Parallel vs nasally-tapering supratarsal crease design.

nique. Accordingly, one should select the appropriate technique for the individualized patient based on his/her unique anatomic and physiological qualities (eg thin vs thick upper eyelid, age, ocular history, etc.) (Table 2). This is critical to successful surgical outcome

and patient satisfaction. In addition to selecting the appropriate supratarsal crease surgi-cal technique, it is equally important to select the appropriate crease configuration. Clearly establishing the desire crease configuration of the patient is critical to surgical success.

CREASE CONFIGURATION

Supratarsal crease placement - HeightIn general, the supratarsal crease should not be placed higher than the superior border of the tarsal plate. This is due to the fact that placement of a crease higher than the superior tarsal border tends to decrease the contractility of the levator muscle and that it is more difficult to lower the crease than to raise it. In addition, a high crease can look unnatural. Unless the patient specifically desires a high placement of the supratarsal crease it is advised to err on the side of conservative, more inferior, placement.

Supratarsal crease configuration - ShapeThere are two common crease configurations of the supratarsal crease among Asians: parallel configuration and nasally-tapering configuration (Fig. 2-4). In order to achieve patient satisfaction, there must be a preoperative consensus between patient and sur-

132


geon on the selection of the specified crease configuration.

Dynamic creaseThe most important aesthetic ideal in the supratarsal crease is the dynamic nature of the crease. The dynamic crease is defined as one that is present when the upper eyelid is open and one that is imper-ceptible when the eyelid is closed or looking down. To create a su-pratarsal crease, a component of the anterior lamella (eg dermis) must be fixated to an element of the posterior lamella (eg levator aponeurosis), which is responsible for lid elevation. Whether the incisional technique is utilized or a minimal incision suture tech-nique is utilized, all supratarsal crease surgeries fixate the anterior lamella to the posterior lamella. In order to create a dynamic crease and avoid an uncomely static crease deformity, it is important not to directly anchor the skin to the tarsal plate. The skin flap should instead be fixated to the septoaponeurotic tissues [18,21,22]. This is described in detail in later sections.

Static crease deformityThere are generally two types of static crease deformity: a depress-ed scar or an overly deep fold. The depressed scar occurs when ex-cessive orbicularis oculi muscle excision was performed – thereby creating a significant muscle gap. The overly-deep fold variant oc-curs when the lower skin incision flap is anchored too far superior-ly onto the tarsus or levator apoenurosis [22].

Aesthetic goalsThe aesthetic goals of Asian Oculoplastic surgery are to provide the appearance of a naturally appearing, well-defined, and wide-open palpebral fissure within the normal variations of Asian anat-omy. It is important to note that the aesthetic goal of these proce-dures is not “Westernization” but to create the appearance of a nat-uralappearing, relatively larger, and open palpebral fissure [23]. The perception of size and shape of the eye is actually based on the perception of the size or shape of the white scleral triangles on either side of the cornea: the nasal scleral triangle and the lateral scleral triangle [26]. The reduction or elimination of the epicanthal fold uncovers, increases, and clearly delineates the nasal scleral tri-angle - thereby creating the perception of a larger eye. In the case of

the supratarsal crease, the presence of a supratarsal crease creates the illusion of a vertically larger palpebral fissure (Fig. 5, 6). In simple terms, the procedures discussed today – incisional su-pratarsal crease surgery, minimal-incision supratarsal crease sur-gery, and epicanthoplasty – all strive to create a larger and naturally appearing palpebral fissure. In the following section we will discuss the authors’ preferred techniques for Incisional Supratarsal Crease Surgery, Minimal Inci-sion Supratarsal Crease Surgery, and Epicanthoplasty Surgery.

INCISIONAL SUPRATARSAL CREASE SURGICAL TECHNIQUE

Author Chen’s preferred methodThe author Chen prefers this incisional method as it provides su-perior control of crease height and shape to create a permanent, natural crease with lessened incidence of complications. He reports an overall consensus of ~5-10% need for revision among all practi-tioners of this method. In addition, by fixating the skin to the apo-neurotic tissues, this procedure recreates the anatomy thought to be found in naturally-occurring supratarsal creases. This technique also utilizes the same incision for the supratarsal crease creation to reduce the medial canthal upper lid fold, thereby reducing the need for a separate medial epicanthoplasty incision (See below).

Operative technique – Full incision technique [18,27-31] (Video 1. Incisional Technique)The appropriate oral premedications (one tablet of Vicodin/hydro-codone acetaminophen as analgesic and 10 milligrams of Valium/diazepam as sedative) are given one hour prior to surgery. Intrave-nous line is started. The upper lid skin and sub-orbicularis layers are infiltrated with 2% xylocaine with 1:100,000 dilution of epine-phrine, along the incision line (A #30 gauge needle is used and the volume injected is seldom over 0.5-0.75 mL for each eyelid). After a 5 minutes period for the anesthetic to disperse, the operative field is prepped and vital signs monitors are applied.

Step 1: Marking of crease incisionAttention is turned to the right eye. A black protective corneal eye

Fig. 5. Absence of supratarsal crease. Fig. 6. Presence of supratarsal crease – after supratarsal crease surgery.

133


shield is applied. The upper lid’s tarsal plate is everted (Fig. 7) and a caliper used to measure the vertical height of the central portion of the tarsal plate. The lid is returned to its normal position and meth-ylene blue ink is used to transpose the measured central tarsal height to the lid skin as the central point of the crease incision(lower line), usually at about 7 mm from the lashes.

Step 2: Skin incisionDepending on clinical finding, typically a segment of skin measur-ing about 2-3 mm centrally and laterally, and 1 mm medially is in-cluded in the upper and lower lines of incision (Fig. 8). Skin inci-sion is made using a #15 blade.

Step 3: Beveled transection through orbicularis oculi layer [27]When the orbicularis muscle is seen, control of capillary oozing is carried out using bipolar cautery. This layer is carefully traversed using surgical blade or monopolar cautery with cutting mode on a low energy setting. The cautery tip is intentionally beveled superi-orly along the orbicularis such that the orbital septum is reached at a slightly higher level from the superior tarsal border. The beveled approach allows a safer route to the preaponeurotic space while avoiding inadvertent touch of the levator muscle.

Step 4: Opening of orbital septumWhen the preaponeurotic fat is seen through a small opening of the septum, the septum is opened horizontally with a blunt scissors (Westcott’s), avoiding blood vessels in the fat pads or the levator aponeurosis underneath.

Step 5: Treatment of fat padsThe strip of skin-muscle bounded by the two skin incisions, is re-tracted inferiorly using a Blair retractor. If preaponeurotic fat is pro-

Fig. 7. Everted Lid. Right upper lid is everted and the height of the tarsus is measured centrally with a caliper from the posterior lid mar-gin to the superior tarsal border.

Fig. 8. Incision. Skin incision has been made, first along the lower line of incision - which will become the new crease line, and then along the upper line of incision.

Fig. 9. Preaponeurotic space. Preaponeurotic space and Trapezoidal debulking and trimming of the skin-muscle strip – This maneuver often facilitates the glide mechanism [28] (glide plane) of the levator relative to the anterior skin/orbicularis oculi layer, allowing an eyelid crease pulled by the levator/Muller’s to indent dynamically against a relaxed preseptal skin-orbicularis layer which forms the eyelid fold.

134


lapsing significantly down and overlaps the superior tarsal border where the crease construction is to occur, it can be partially excised.

Step 6: Trapezoidal debulking and trimming of the skin-muscle strip along the lower skin incision at level of superior tarsal border (Fig. 9)The preaponeurotic platform has been cleared for optimal inter-play between the posterior lamella of levator and Mueller’s muscle with its attached tarsus, and the relaxed anterior skin and orbicu-laris oculi; there is now less hindrance (impedance) to dynamic crease construction. The crease forms well even without wound closure at this point.

Step 7: Resetting of tissue planeAt this point, it is essential to release the forehead drapes and prop-erly reposition the brow and upper lid tissues in relation to the un-derlying levator aponeurosis and lower pretarsal tissues. It avoids setting an exaggerated crease height, induction of secondary ptosis, lagopthalmos on downgaze, and a secondary higharched brow as a compensatory reaction. This is a most under-appreciated step in upper blepharoplasty. In revisional cases, this resetting allows some skin recruitment and brings in additional soft tissues to partially fill in any deep sulcus from fat excision associated with previous blepharoplasty. At this point is where management of medial upper lid fold comes in: Often among patients who present a clinically evident medial upper lid fold, there may be a need to reduce the prominence of this fold. The author uses the following technique as an added so-lution set: (i) In the design of the nasally-tapered crease, the incision lines

are drawn to converge towards the medial canthus as well as the medial fold. To enhance the crease invagination to blend in under the fold, the area is slightly undermined, and excess skin tissue is cut just below the converging crease line (infra-

crease cut, first snip); the lower edge’s skin is migrated up and a second cut takes care of the small dog-ear. The crease is clos-ed with an interrupted suture placed with the knot on the lower side of the wound edge (infraanchoring of knot,“down-knot” the crease). The goal is to have the nasal-tapering crease indent to beneath (inferior to) the natural residual fold. (Al-ternatively one may also make the first snip along the crest of the medial canthal fold, and then migrate the lower edge’s ex-cess skin upward to trim it; then infra-anchor its closing knot. It has a slightly higher chance of postoperative induration since the skin along the crest of the medial fold is slightly thicker.)

(ii) With a parallel shape design, after the main steps are carried out and the tissue planes have been reset, the area under the medial fold is slightly undermined. The first relaxing snip near the medial end of the undermined redundant skin is bi-ased towards the lower incision in a slightly oblique fashion (infra-crease cut); the lower edge’s excess skin is migrated upward such that the medial fold is reduced with the second cut removing the dog ear and based along the medial direc-tion of the parallel crease shape. The closure at this end is with a fine interrupted suture tied very lightly and laid on the su-perior side of the incision (supra-placement of knot without anchoring; “up-knot” the tie loosely, the rationale being that the medial end of a natural parallel crease tends to be shal-low). These delicate techniques I used have handled the eth-nic non-pathologic medial upper lid fold quite well without the complicated steps usually associated with treatment of epicanthal fold (Epicanthus), which is usually reserved for findings in Down’s syndrome, or patients born with blepha-rophimosis [32].

Step 8: Crease construction and wound closure#6-0 sutures are applied from the lower skin edge, picking up small strands of the levator aponeurosis just above the superior tarsal bor-

Fig. 10. Crease construction and wound closure. (A) procedure completed – eyelid in passive repose. (B) Upper lid opened, crease indents naturally prior to closure without any skin stitched. (C) Completion of wound closure, the lid opens freely with good crease indentation.

A B C

135


Fig. 11. Pre-operative and post-operative photos.

Fig. 12. The 5-point triangular continuous suture technique.

der, then through the upper skin edge and then tied down. Six to nine interrupted sutures are typically used. The rest of the skin gap is closed using 7-0 prolene, nylon or silk (Fig. 10C). The eye shield is removed from the right eye and applied to the left eye where the procedure is repeated. When completed, each eye is flushed with normal saline. The surgeon checks for symmetry in the crease and makes necessary adjustment.

Post-operative managementThe patient receives ice compresses to the upper eyelids and is in-structed to continue icing and bed rest for one day. The patient is told to have restricted physical exertion the first week. Topical to-bramycin or gentamicin-prednisolone ophthalmic ointment (Pred-G, by Allergan) is applied four times daily for one week. Suture re-moval is usually in one week. Fig. 11 shows three female patients before and at two months postoperatively; with the first patient’s crease height set at a slightly below-average crease height of 6.5 mm, the middle set is at medium-average crease height of 7.0 mm, while the right set is at higher than average crease height of 7.5 mm.

MINIMAL INCISION SUPRATARSAL CREASE SURGERY

Author Ahn’s preferred minimal incision method - triangular 5-microincision suture methodThe author Ahn prefers this method over the classic rectangular 3-microincisional suture technique as the additional micro-inci-sions and triangular configuration creates a more even crease, in-creases the fixation of anterior to posterior lamella, and decreases the overall area of potential tissue strangulation with triangles over

rectangles (Fig. 12). Of note, addition of a Muller-muscle loop pli-cation to this technique can create a simultaneous mild ptosis cor-rection [17] (Fig. 13).

Operative technique – 5 point triangular continuous suture technique [17] (Video 2. Minimal Incision – 5 Point Triangular Continuous Suture Technique)

Step 1: Preoperative markings are made with the patient in sitting upright position It is critical to determine whether the patient desires a parallel or a nasally-tapering crease configuration.

Step 2: The patient is brought to the operating room and placed in supine position

136


The procedure is performed under conscious sedation and local anesthetics. After reconfirmation of all markings, the anterior la-mella and posterior lamella is injected with a half-inch #26 gauge needle containing 2% lidocaine and 1:50,000 epinephrine. Anes-thetic eye-drops are placed as well.

Step 3: Using a #11 scalpel tip, five micro-incisions are made at equal intervals just above the level of the superior border of the tarsal plate. Number the slits from 1 through 5, starting medially and ending laterally. Use iris scissors to dissect through the micro-incisions for a larger opening subdermally. By utilizing a lateral microincision, the risk of inadvertent levator injury is decreased. Through the 4th microincision, grab the orbicularis oculi muscle with 0.5 forceps and cauterize the muscle carefully through the forceps. Do not al-low the forceps to come in contact with the skin. (This allows access to the post-septal region for debulking the thicker-lidded patient.)

Step 4: In those patients with thicker lids, carefully grab the preapo-neurotic fat through the 4th micro-incision. Through gentle pull-ing and teasing motions, carefully deliver a conservative amount of adipose tissue to be removed. Using a mosquito clamp, carefully clamp the adipose tissue, cut the adipose tissue, and cauterize the stump before removal of the clamp. Allow the cauterized adipose stump to retract back into the lid.

Step 5: Utilize corneal protection with either a corneal shield or use of a Jaeger lid plate. The suture used is a #7-0 blue nylon on a long tapered needle. The suture is introduced through the 4th slit sub-cutaneously and passed out through the 3rd slit. From the 3rd slit, the suture is passed posteriorly through the conjunctiva from the everted lid right above the superior edge of the tarsal plate (~1-2 mm). Then, the suture is passed back out from the same point in the conjunctiva out of the 2nd skin micro-incision. Next, pass the suture subcutaneously from the 2nd to the 1st skin micro-incision. The suture is then passed again back through the conjunctiva of the everted lid right above the superior edge of the tarsal plate. Then, the suture is passed back out from this point to the 2nd skin micro-incision. Repeat this pattern back to the 4th skin micro-incision, utilizing all 5 micro-incisions. This completes triangular-shaped continuous suture path (Fig. 12).

Step 6: When the triangular-shaped continuous suture run is com-plete, the suture should be exiting the same hole that the suture was first introduced, the 4th microincision. At this point, tie the knot over a blunt needle or a cotton-tip at the appropriate tension to avoid purse-stringing and strangulation of the lid tissues. Cut the knot and allow knot to retract into the lid. Note, over-tightening the knot can cause increased tissue strangulation when post-operative ede-ma sets in.

Step 7: Repeat on the contralateral lid.

Step 8: If the patient has normal levator function and mild ptosis (1-2 mm), a Müller muscle plication loop can be added during the triangular-shaped continuous suture path (between the 3rd and 4th micro-incision in the conjunctiva side) by plicating the Müller’s muscle subconjunctivally from the level at the superior border of the tarsal plate to approximately 10-15 mm cephalad (average is between 12-13 mm) towards the superior sulcus and back to the superior border of the tarsal plate before passing the suture back out of the 4th skin micro-incision (Fig. 13).

Postoperative managementInstruct patient to maintain head elevation when possible and to use ice for comfort as needed.

EPICANTHOPLASTY

General overview/patient selectionIn many publications, measurements of various periorbital values are used to determine whether the epicanthoplasty procedure should be performed. These include values such as interepicanthal distance, intercanthal distance, and horizontal palpebral fissure dimensions [33,34]. At times, these calculations can be complicated and con-fusing. It is simple to note that the main aesthetic effect of the epic-

Fig. 13. Coronal section of the 5-Point Triangular Continuous Suture Technique with Muller-Muscle Loop Plication.

Levator aponeurosis

Conjoint fascial sheath (check ligament of superior fornix

Müller’s muscle

Levator aponeurosis

Tarsus

137


Fig. 14. With the patient sitting upright and in primary gaze, use a finger to retract the epicanthal fold in a horizontal vector towards the nasal direction. With the medial canthus/caruncle uncovered by the retracted epicanthal fold, mark a dot (B) 2 mm nasal to the lacri-mal lake of the medial canthal region.

Fig. 15. Then lift the marker off of point B and while holding the mark-er in place in the air, release the digitally retracted epicanthal fold and place a mark (A1) where the marker lands (superimposed point).

anthoplasty procedure is that of enlarging the nasal scleral triangle and creating the perception of a larger palpebral fissure. Also, in the patient with an epicanthal fold, performing the supratarsal crease procedure alone diminishes its effect by leaving the blunted nasal scleral triangle made by the persistent epicanthal fold. Generally speaking, in the Asian patient who desires a parallel-oriented crease, it is aesthetically pleasing to have a small or non-existent epicanthal fold. Also, in those patients with very large ca-runcles, it might be advised not to perform epicanthoplasty to keep the caruncle from over-exposure.

Skin-Redraping Epicanthoplasty [33]There are multitude of published epicanthoplasty techniques rang-ing from simple direct excision, Z-plasty, Y-V advancement meth-od, W-plasty, etc. Among those, the more popular techniques are the Uchida split V-W technique [7,35], modified Mustarde tech-nique [36], and the half Z-plasty technique. Recently, the skinre-draping technique has become one of the more popular techniques. [33]

Operative technique – Skin redraping technique (Video 3. Epicanthoplasty – Skin-Redraping Technique)

Step 1: With the patient sitting upright and in primary gaze, use a finger to retract the epicanthal fold in a horizontal vector towards the nasal direction. With the medial canthus/caruncle uncovered by the retracted epicanthal fold, mark a dot (B) 2 mm nasal to the lacrimal lake of the medial canthal region (Fig. 14).

Step 2: Then lift the marker off of point B and while holding the marker in place in the air, release the digitally retracted epicanthal

fold and place a mark (A1) where the marker lands (superimposed point). (Of note, point B and A1 should lie along the same horizon-tal axis parallel to the floor) (Fig. 15).Step 3: Next, draw a dotted line that is perpendicular to this hori-zontal axis at point A1. At a point that is approximately 70-80% of the distance between A1 and B, mark point A2. (Of note, point A2 should be along the same horizontal axis as points A1 and B). The distance from A1 to A2 in relationship to the distance from A2 to B should be a 2:8 ratio (Fig. 16).

Step 4: Next, draw a solid line that is perpendicular to the horizon-tal axis through point A2. At a point that is nasal to the medial lim-bus of the iris, mark point C along the subciliary line. Now, mark point D between A2 and B but at a location slightly higher/cepha-lad than the horizontal axis where point A1, A2 and B lay. Note, the incision line will be from point A2, through point D, point B,

Fig. 16. At a point that is approximately 70-80% of the distance be-tween A1 and B, mark point A2. (Of note, point A2 should be along the same horizontal axis as points A1 and B).

138


Fig. 18. Undermining is done superior (cephalad) and inferiorly (cau-dad) to the incision line.

Fig. 19. The skin will now redrape into the configuration shown in this Figure.

Fig. 17. Incision is made with a #15 scalpel through skin and subcu-taneous tissues along the marked incision line.

and ends at point C (Fig. 16).

Step 5: After these preoperative markings are made, the area is in-filtrated with local anesthesia.

Step 6: Incision is made with a #15 scalpel through skin and subcu-taneous tissues along the marked incision line (Fig. 17).

Step 7: Undermining is done superior (cephalad) and inferiorly (caudad) to the incision line (Fig. 18).

Step 8: The orbicularis muscle of the epicanthal fold is transected sharply and trimmed. Once this is done, meticulous hemostasis is achieved. The skin will now redrape into the configuration shown in Fig. 19. The inferior skin flap will have a tendency to move more laterally and the superior skin flap will have a tendency to move in a more cephalad direction. As you start closure of the skin incision by closing point A2 to the upper skin flap’s B point, a dog-ear will

form around the upper skin flap’s point D. This dog-ear can be di-rectly excised or can be treated with laser resurfacing. In addition, during closure, a length discrepancy will be noted between the two skin edges. It is important to redistribute the skin incision flaps evenly to evenly disperse and eliminate this length discrepancy during meticulous closure. If an epicanthoplasty is performed with the primary intent to re-lieve the tension created by the fold, use a much shorter incision where point A2 is halfway or less between point A1 and point B (60:40 ratio). On the reverse side, if point A2 is made at a point larg-er than 70-80% of the distance between A1 and B (e.g. 1:9), there will be a great overcorrection and the patient will have a stretched and pronounced caruncular show.

Postoperative managementIn normal postoperative course, most epicanthoplasty scars will mature to imperceptible state with at least 3 months time. In the case where there appears to be hypertrophic scarring after this time, adjuvant CO2 laser resurfacing at the site can improve the scarring. Some surgeons advocate steroid micro-injection at the time of sur-gery and postoperatively as well. With proper preoperative coun-seling of expected 3 month course of healing, most patient expec-tations can be managed.

CONCLUSIONSThis paper has highlighted the need for unified terminology in the field of Asian Aesthetic Oculoplastic Surgery. In addition, we have re-examined and simplified the aesthetic goals of the main proce-dures. We have provided author’s preferred selection of the major techniques with evaluation of its advantages and disadvantages. In conclusion, the most important element in patient satisfac-tion is clear communication of surgical expectations. Then, proper selection of the most suitable pre-operative design, type of surgery

139


performed, and specific crease configuration based on the individ-ual’s anatomic and physiological characteristics can be achieved.

REFERENCES1. Sayoc BT. Absence of superior palpebral fold in slit eyes; an anatomic

and physiologic explanation. Am J Ophthalmol 1956;42:298-300.2. Morikawa K, Yamamoto H, Uchinuma E, et al. Scanning electron mi-

croscopic study on double and single eyelids in Orientals. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2001;25:20-4.

3. Jeong S, Lemke BN, Dortzbach RK, et al. The Asian upper eyelid: an anatomical study with comparison to the caucasian eyelid. Arch Oph-thalmol 1999;117:907-12.

4. Cheng J, Xu FZ. Anatomic microstructure of the upper eyelid in the Oriental double eyelid. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001;107:1665-8.

5. Kakizaki H, Takahasi Y, Nakano T, et al. The causative factors or char-acteristics of the Asian double eyelid: an anatomic study. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2012;28:376-81.

6. Bang YH, Chu HH, Park SH, et al. The fallacy of the levator expansion theory. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999;103:1788-91.

7. Park JI. Z-Epicanthoplasty in Asian Eyelids. Plast Reconstr Surg 1996; 98:602-9.

8. Yoo WM, Park SH, Kwag DR. Root Z-epicanthoplasty in Asian eyelids. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002;109:2067-71.

9. Lee Y, Lee E, Park WJ. Anchor epicanthoplasty combined with out-fold type double eyelidplasty for Asians: do we have to make an addi-tional scar to correct the Asian epicanthal fold? Plast Reconstr Surg 2000;105:1872-80.

10. Kakizaki H, Zako M, Ide A, et al. Causes of undercorrection of medial palpebral fissures in blepharoptosis surgery. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2004;20:198-201.

11. Mikamo M. Mikamo’s double-eyelid operation: the advent of Japanese aesthetic surgery. 1896. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997;99:664.

12. Shirakabe Y, Kinugasa T, Kawata M, et al. The double eyelid operation in Japan: its evolution as related to cultural changes. Ann Plast Surg 1985;15:224-41.

13. Cho BC, Byun JS. New technique combined with suture and incision method for creating a more physiologically natural double-eyelid. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010;125:324-31.

14. Liu X, Fan D, Guo X, et al. A transcutaneous, subcutaneous, and in-tratarsal suturing procedure in double eyelid surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010;126:2133-9.

15. Baek SM, Kim SS, Tokunaga S, et al. Oriental blepharoplasty: single stitch, non-incision technique. Plast Reconstr Surg 1989;83:236-42.

16. Mutou Y, Mutou H. Intradermal double eyelid operation and its fol-low-up results. Br J Plast Surg 1972;25:285-91.

17. Ahn TJ, Kim KK. Cases of mild ptosis correction with suture-method. Arch of Aesthetic Plast Surg 2012;18:15-20.

18. Chen WP. Asian blepharoplasty. Update on anatomy and techniques. Ophthal Plas Reconstr Surg 1987;3:135-40.

19. Kang DH, Koo SH, Choi JH, et al. Laser blepharoplasty for making double eyelids in Asians. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001;107:1884-9.

20. Choi Y, Eo S. A new crease fixation technique for double eyelidplasty using mini-flaps derived from pretarsal levator tissues. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010;126:1048-57.

21. Kim HS, Hwang K, Kim CK, et al. Double-eyelid surgery using sep-toaponeurosisj junctional thickening results in dynamic fold in Asians. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2013;1:e14.

22. Cho IC. The Art of Blepharoplasty. Seoul: Koonja; 2013.23. Nguyen HN, Nguyen N. P92:Upper blepharoplasty for Asian eyelid is

not a westernizing procedure. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006;118 Supple-ment 4:172.

24. Price KM, Gupta PK, Woodward JA, et al. Eyebrow and eyelid dimen-sions: an anthropometric analysis of African Americans and Caucasians. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009;124:615-23.

25. Park DH, Choi WS, Yoon SH, et al. Anthropometry of Asian eyelids by age. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008;121:1405-13.

26. McCord CD, Codner MA. Eyelid and Periorbital Surgery. St. Louis: Quality Medical Publishing; 2008.

27. ChenWP. Concept of triangular, trapezoidal and rectangular debulking of eyelid tissues: application in Asian blepharoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 1996;97:212-8.

28. Chen WP. The concept of a glide zone as it relates to upper lid crease, lid fold, and application in upper blepharoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007;119:379-86.

29. Chen WP. Beveled approach for revisional surgery in Asian blepharo-plasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007;120:545-52.

30. Chen WP, Chen KL. The Eyelid Crease and Double Eyelid Surgery. Cupertino: iBooks textbook; 2012.

31. Chen WP, Khan J. Color Atlas of Cosmetic Oculofacial Surgery. Phila-delphia: Elsevier Saunders; 2010.

32. Johnson CC. Epicanthus. Am J Ophthalmol 1968;66:939-46.33. Oh YW, Seul CH, Yoo WM. Medial epicanthoplasty using the skin re-

draping method. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007;119:703-10.34. Fujiwara T, Maeda M, Kuwae K, et al. Modified split V-W Plasty for

entropion with an epicanthal fold in Asian eyelids. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006;118:635-42.

35. Ahn SY. Epicanthoplasty with modified Uchida method. J Korean Soc Aesth Plast Reconstr Surg 2002;8:75-80.

36. Yoon K. Modification of Mustardé technique for correction of epican-thus in Asian patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 1993;92:1182-6.

pdf (4.39 mb)

Documents