pdf 3.3 one-on-one probabilities-neutron vs nuclide
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/28/2019 PDF 3.3 One-On-One Probabilities-Neutron vs Nuclide
1/15
Nuclear Reactionsand Radiation
3.3 One-on-One Probabilities
Neutron versus Nuclide;
Some neutrons are better thanothers
L. R. Foulke
-
7/28/2019 PDF 3.3 One-On-One Probabilities-Neutron vs Nuclide
2/15
Nuclear Reaction Rates So far we have covered:
Atomic / nuclear structure Nuclear stability Types of radioactive decay / radiation Radiation interactions Neutron interactions
Remaining question: How can we predict the expected frequency of neutron
interactions in a medium? A substance such as nuclear fuel?
-
7/28/2019 PDF 3.3 One-On-One Probabilities-Neutron vs Nuclide
3/15
Probability of an Interaction We start by considering theprobability that a neutron
will strike a single nucleus
Assume that the neutron andnucleus are both solid
spheres.
The neutron sees thenucleus as a round target with
area:A = r2 where ris theradius of the nucleus.
Probability of interaction isproportional to cross sectional
area of nucleus.
Atom
Free Neutron
Top View Neutron View
(Side View)
Image Source: See Note 1
-
7/28/2019 PDF 3.3 One-On-One Probabilities-Neutron vs Nuclide
4/15
Probability of an Interaction A reaction will occur whenany part of the neutron
contacts the nucleus
May be straight-on or glancingblow.
This increases the effectivetarget area of the nucleus by
the radius of the neutron, rn.
The effective target area ofthe nucleus is referred to as
the microscopic cross
section for the nuclide.Atom
Free Neutron
Top View Neutrons View
(Side View)
EffectiveTarget Area
EffectiveTarget Area
miss
Image Source: See Note 1
-
7/28/2019 PDF 3.3 One-On-One Probabilities-Neutron vs Nuclide
5/15
Microscopic Cross Section Microscopic cross section
Cross sectional area of nucleus as seen by neutron, denotedby symbol (units of cm2/nucleus)
Has units of area, given in units ofbarns 1 barn = 1024 cm2
Proportional to the probability that a neutron will strike thenucleus and undergo a reaction
Nuclide dependent Seems like it should be proportional to the nuclear
radius
-
7/28/2019 PDF 3.3 One-On-One Probabilities-Neutron vs Nuclide
6/15
Microscopic Cross SectionMicroscopic Cross Sections Calculated vs. MeasuredNeutron radius: rn=0.8510
15 [meters]
Nuclear radius: ra=1.21015 (A)1/3[meters] (A is atomic mass)
Theoretical Microscopic Cross Section: =(rn+r
a)2[meters2]
Nuclide Calculated Measured
1H 0.132 barns 20.43 barns4He 0.238 barns 0.759 barns235
U 2.140 barns ~500 barns
Theoretical (solid spheres) model is correct to within a couple oforders or magnitude, but it is not a good approximation
-
7/28/2019 PDF 3.3 One-On-One Probabilities-Neutron vs Nuclide
7/15
Microscopic Cross Sections
Nuclide Calculated Measured* @ incident energy of 0.1 eV
1H 0.132 barns 20.43 barns4He 0.238 barns 0.759 barns235U 2.140 barns ~500 barns
U-235
He-4
H-1
Total microscopic cross sections as a function of
incident neutron energy
Image Source: See Note 1
-
7/28/2019 PDF 3.3 One-On-One Probabilities-Neutron vs Nuclide
8/15
Microscopic Cross Section In reality quantum effects play a large role in determining the effective
target area of the nucleus as seen by an approaching neutron
The microscopic cross section depends heavily on: The structure / stability of the target nucleus
Partially filled neutron shells are more receptive to a neutroninteraction than completely filled shells
The energy of the neutron
Typically low-energy (slow) neutrons are more likely to interactwith a nucleus than high-energy (fast) neutrons.
The neutron energy dependence is extremely complicated
-
7/28/2019 PDF 3.3 One-On-One Probabilities-Neutron vs Nuclide
9/15
Microscopic Cross Section
Image Source: See Note 2
-
7/28/2019 PDF 3.3 One-On-One Probabilities-Neutron vs Nuclide
10/15
Microscopic Cross Section The energy dependence of microscopic cross sections can bedivided into three ranges:
High Energy (neutron energy > 1 keV) (aka FAST range) Quantum effects are less important and probability of
interaction shows little variation. Resonance Range (1 eV < neutron energy < 1 keV)
Quantum effects dominate and probability of interactiondepends on how closely the neutron energy matches an
unfilled nuclear shell in the target nuclide.
Thermal / 1-over-v Range (neutron energy < 1 eV) Probability of interaction increases as neutron energy
(velocity) decreases
-
7/28/2019 PDF 3.3 One-On-One Probabilities-Neutron vs Nuclide
11/15
Microscopic Cross Section
1/v Range(Thermal range)
ResonanceRange
High-Energy
Range(Fast range)
Image Source: See Note 2
-
7/28/2019 PDF 3.3 One-On-One Probabilities-Neutron vs Nuclide
12/15
Analogy for
1-over-vNeutron
Absorption
-
7/28/2019 PDF 3.3 One-On-One Probabilities-Neutron vs Nuclide
13/1513
1 MeV
235U
238
U
Uranium Fission Cross Sections
Image Source: See Note 2
-
7/28/2019 PDF 3.3 One-On-One Probabilities-Neutron vs Nuclide
14/1514
Uranium-235 Fission Cross Section
235U
1 barn0.025 eV
584 barns
10 MeV0.1 Mev
Thermal Advantage~ x500+
Image Source: See Note 2
-
7/28/2019 PDF 3.3 One-On-One Probabilities-Neutron vs Nuclide
15/15
1. Reprinted with permission from DavidGriesheimer, University of Pittsburgh.
2. Adapted with permission from the AmericanNuclear Society. Nuclear Engineering Theory and Technology of CommercialNuclear Powerby Ronald Allen Knief, 2nd
Edition. Copyright 2008 by the AmericanNuclear Society, La Grange Park, Illinois.Figure 2-12 (slides 9, 11, 13, and 14).
Image Source Notes