paying for open access? institutional funding streams and oa publication charges stephen pinfield...
TRANSCRIPT
Paying for Open Access? institutional funding streamsand OA publication charges
Stephen PinfieldUniversity of Nottingham
Outline
Background
Activity in UK universities
Case study: University of Nottingham
Open access (OA) mandates
Examples:
UK Research Councils Wellcome Trust European Research Council National Institutes of Health in USA Australian Research Council
Routes to open access*
Publication in OA or ‘hybrid’ journal
Deposit in OA repository
* ‘Open Access’: Where the full content is freely, immediately and permanently available and can be accessed and reused in an unrestricted way
Publishers and prices: examplesPublisher OA option Price
American Chemical Society Author Choice $3000
American Institute of Physics Author Select $1500-$2500
American Physical Society Free to Read $975-$1300
Blackwell Online Open $2600
British Medical Journal Publishing BMJ Unlocked $2220-$3145
Cambridge University Press Cambridge Open $2700
Elsevier Sponsorship Option $3000
Oxford University Press Oxford Open $1500-$2800
Professional Engineering Publishing (IME) Engineering Open Choice £1700
Routledge iOpenAccess $3250
Royal Society EXIS Open Choice $278-400 and $16 per page for first 6-10 pages, $93 per page thereafter
Royal Society of Chemistry RSC Open Science £1000-£2500
Sage Sage Open $3000
Springer Open Choice $3000
Taylor and Francis iOpenAccess $3250
Implications for institutions
What do these international developments mean for individual institutions?
What policies, facilities and services do institutions need to be put in place?
How can researchers be helped to pay open-access charges?
Funder policies and universities Mandates v. permissable claims Direct costs: project budget Indirect costs: overheads Institutional funding streams: OA fund
Wellcome Trust: exemplar Direct grants Institutional funds Contingency funds
UK data
JISC Survey conducted in May/June 2008*
Responses from 61 institutions10 Russell Group18 Pre–92 institutions28 Post–92 institutions5 Colleges of HE
No clear pattern of responsibility for OA publication charges in institutions
16%
30%46%
8%
Russell Group
Pre-92 institutions
Post-92 institutions
Colleges of HE
* With thanks to JISC and Fred Friend
OA publication fund
Out of 61: 6 institutions
have a central OA fund
4 have School/ Faculty funds
11 “likely” to have fund in future
10%
7%
18%
65%
Central OA fund
School/Faculty OAfunds
Likely to have fundin future
No fund
Author survey
General comments:
713 Biomedical researchers
Researchers are unsure of their institutions’ policies and procedures
Many do not feel supported by their university in this area
Institutional requirements
Senior ‘champion’ to co-ordinate approach Clarify funds available and funder policies Establish clear institutional management arrangements for
grants and cost recovery Set up funds in institutions to cover OA charges Agree policies for researchers not funded by relevant
funders Consider relationship to library funding Develop clear institutional procedures documents Undertake institution-wide publicity Provide proactive support for academics
Case study: recommendations to Nottingham Research Committee*1. All authors should be encouraged to deposit copies of their
papers in the Nottingham institutional repository
2. The University should identify a central budget upon which all authors in the institution can call to fund publication/OA charges
3. Wellcome-funded authors should be reminded of the availability of funds to pay for their publication/OA charges
4. Further internal publicity should be carried out in order to inform academic staff of the new requirements of funders
5. Arrangements should be put in place to monitor the University’s compliance with funder requirements
* Adopted November 2006
Case study: Nottingham OA fund
Set up as a partnership between Research Innovation Services (RIS) and Information Services
Approved by University Research Committee in November 2006; procedures document approved in March 2007
Administered centrally by RIS Designed to fund OA charges (for OA or hybrid journals)
not page/colour charges Available to all members of the University regardless of
their source of research funding Currently being monitored, but not rationed Additional funds; not diverted from periodical purchases To date, low usage: 75 requests in 18 months, average
cost per article of about £1400
References SHERPA JULIET (funder policies)
http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/juliet/
SHERPA ROMEO (publisher copyright policies)http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo
JISC Survey to be published Autumn 2008