part-financed by the european union (european regional development fund) wp 3 pomeranian bight case...

Part-financed by the European Union(European Regional Development Fund)

WP 3 Pomeranian Bight Case Draft work plan

Region Skåne (PP7)

1st WS Pom B (WP3, PP7, Skåne), (18-)19/3

Objectives• introduction to MSP • mobilising players – “warming up”• Increasing local/regional knowledge about MSP

(incl Balt Sea Plan, Swedish status quo, EU) • increase stakeholders awareness of significance

of MSP for them• Elaborate concepts for consultations

Click View / Header & Footer to edit


WS Design•Swedish language (except internat. speakers) •~50 participants•Location: Malmö•Start with dinner day 1•Presentations day 2 (morning)•WS day 2 (afternoon)



Presentations•The Swedish approach •The upcoming Swedish MSP legislation, EU COM proposal•Presentation of the BaltSeaPlan draft MSP•Pom Bight gaps - What do we actually know about the coastal/sea water of south Sweden?•Zoning and other principles in MSP •Local example of MSP (Lomma)



Workshop•What is in it (MSP) for you (your stakeholder group)?•Which are the conflicts in the Pom Bight (from a Swedish point of view)? Drawing the conflict map!•Zoning – how can it be used as a pedagogic tool in a multi-stakeholder-dialogue? •A successful MSP consultation from your point of view?•Established/lacking stakeholder groups relevant for the Pom Bight MSP?


Pom B (WP3, PP7, Skåne)

Succeeding workshops/meetings April – Oct 2013: Small dialogue meetings with Pom B

stakeholders Objectives: •Methodological input for future processes: i.e. design of consultations, links to other processes•Identification of MLG focal issues for WS 2•Higher level of awareness: ”What´s in it for us” & ”What is our role”? Priorities? •How do our sh-group want to partiSEApate?


2nd WS Pom B (WP3, PP7, Skåne), (30-31 Oct)

WP3 - Objectives of 2nd WSMain focus on testing the methodological lessons learned during previous WS/meetings!

Also: Local-regional-national consultation workshop How can existing structures be used in MSP?Urgent data gaps


3rd WS, Pom B (WP3, PP7), Szczecin, April 2014

Cross-sectorial transnational WS

Bringing together SE/PL/DE stakeholders to a transnational process. Matching the previous outcomes against different planning cultures, legislations and planning administrations.Identification of pros/contras of different zoning principlesZoning – how can it be used in the cross-sectorial transnational-dialogue?


part-financed by the european union (european regional development fund) wp 3 pomeranian bight case...

Documents