External Monitoring Report of Implementation of Land Acquisition & Resettlement Plan

EMR of Implementation of Land Acquisition & Resettlement Plan (E-35, Hassanabdal – Havelian Expressway) (July 2017)

PAK: National Trade Corridor Highway Investment

Program (NTCHIP) – Tranche 2 (Package I&II)

Prepared by National Highways Authority for the Asian Development Bank.

NOTES

(i) The fiscal year (FY) of the Government of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan and its agencies ends on 30 June.

(ii) In this report, "$" refers to US dollars. This EMR of Implementation of Land Acquisition & Resettlement Plan is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.

NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY

Ministry of Communication Government of Pakistan

National Trade Corridor Highway Investment Program

(ADB Loan No. 3121-PAK NTCHIP Tranche 2)

Hassanabdal-Havelian (E-35) Expressway Project

External Monitoring Report of

Implementation of Land Acquisition and

Resettlement Plan

(Package I: 0+000 – 20+300 & Package II: 20+300 – 39+500)

July 2017

Prepared by: Abdul Hameed, External Monitoring Agent (EMA), National Highway Authority,

Ministry of Communications, Government of Pakistan

i

Table of Contents

1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 1

1.1 Project Background..................................................................................................... 1

1.2 Project Description ...................................................................................................... 1

2 Project Impacts and Status of Implementation.................................................................... 4

2.1 Implementation Analysis ........................................................................................... 12

2.2 Land Compensation and Factors Responsible for Delay ........................................ 13

2.3 Meager Amount of Land Payment: ........................................................................... 13

2.4 Other Reasons of Delay in Payments ...................................................................... 13

2.5 Payment of Non-land Assets .................................................................................... 15

2.6 Payment for the Structures: ...................................................................................... 15

2.7 Payment for the Crops: ............................................................................................. 15

2.8 Payment for the Trees: ............................................................................................. 15

2.9 Payment of Allowances - Shifting, Vulnerable, Employment, Electricity and

Livelihood Rehabilitation Allowances: ...................................................................... 15

3 Institutional Arrangements for Land and Resettlement Activities ..................................... 17

3.1 Environment Afforestation Land and Social (EALS) ................................................ 17

3.2 Project Implementation Unit (PIU) ............................................................................ 17

3.3 Grievances Redress Mechanism .............................................................................. 17

3.4 Formation of Displaced Persons Committees (DPCs) ............................................. 19

3.5 Social Safeguards Management Consultant (SSMC) .............................................. 19

3.6 Delay in Salary for SSMC’s staff .............................................................................. 20

4 Consultation and Information Disclosure........................................................................... 21

4.1 Employment Opportunities ....................................................................................... 21

4.2 Stakeholders Consultations and assessment of DPs Feedback ............................. 21

5 Conclusions and Recommendations ................................................................................. 24

6 Recommendations ............................................................................................................. 25

List of Annexures

Annexure – A List of Consultations with DPCs/DPs Hassanabdal-Havelian Expressway E-35

28

Annexure – B Survey to Obtain the Views of DPs on Meager Amount .................................. 30

Annexure – C Effort made by NHA for 100% payment ........................................................... 34

Annexure – D Status of Payment of Package-I....................................................................... 39

Annexure – E Payment Status of Package-II .......................................................................... 42

Annexure – F Notification of GRC ........................................................................................... 45

Pictorial Presentation ............................................................................................................... 46

ii

List of Figures

Figure 1.1: Location Map of E-35 Project 2

Figure 2.1: Payment Disbursement 12

Figure 2.2: DPs wise Payment Status 12

Figure 2.3: DPs wise Payment Status 12

List of Tables

Table 2.1: Status of Implementation 10

Table 2.2 Reasons for Delay in Payment 14

Table 3.1: Details of Registered Complaints for Package-I 17

Table 3.2: Details of Registered Complaints for Package-II 18

Table 4.1: Responses of the Contacted DPs 22

Table 4.2: DPs and local community Concerns about the Project 23

Table 6.1: Proposed Action Plan 26

iii

Abbreviation Description

ADB Asian Development Bank

AH Affected Household

CoI Corridor of Impact

DP Displaced Person

EA Executing Agency (NHA)

EMA External Monitoring Agency

IA Implementing Agency

IMR Internal Monitoring Report

GoP Government of Pakistan

GRM Grievance Redress Mechanism

LAA Land Acquisition Act 1894

LAR Land Acquisition and Resettlement

LARP Land Acquisition and Resettlement Plan

M&E Monitoring & Evaluation

NHA National Highway Authority

PIU Project Implementation Unit

PMU Project Management Unit

RoW Right of Way

SPS Safeguard Policy Statement, 2009

SSMC Social Safeguard Management Consultant

ToRs Term of References

iv

Glossary

Affected Household: All members of a project affected household residing together and operating as a single economic unit, who are adversely affected by the Project or any of its components; may consist of a single nuclear family or an extended family group Compensation: Money or payment in kind to which the affected masses are entitled in order to replace the lost asset, resource or income Displaced Persons: In the context of involuntary resettlement, displaced persons are those who are physically displaced (relocation, loss of residential land, or loss of shelter) and/or economically displaced (loss of land, assets, access to assets, income sources, or means of livelihoods) as a result of (i) involuntary acquisition of land, or (ii) involuntary restrictions on land use or on access to legally designated parks and protected areas Entitlement: Range of measures comprising compensation, income restoration, transfer assistance, income substitution, and relocation which are due to displaced persons (DPs), depending on the nature of their losses, to restore their economic and social base Involuntary resettlement: Development project results in unavoidable resettlement losses that DPs have no option but to rebuild their lives, incomes and asset bases elsewhere Land Acquisition: The process whereby a person is compelled by a government agency to alienate all or part of the land a person owns or possesses to the ownership and possession of the government agency for public purpose in return for compensation Relocation: The physical resettlement of a DP from her/his pre-project place of residence Replacement Cost: Compensation for acquired land, structures and other assets, including (i) fair market value, (ii) transaction costs, (iii) interest accrued, (iv) transitional and restoration costs, and (v) other applicable payments, if any Resettlement plan: A time-bound action plan with budget setting out resettlement strategy, objectives, entitlement, actions, responsibilities, monitoring and evaluation Vulnerable groups: Distinct groups of people who might suffer disproportionately from resettlement effects

1

1. Introduction

1. Monitoring and Evaluation: Resettlement Monitoring and Evaluation is an integral part of the resettlement process which entails monitoring of preparation and implementation of Land acquisition & Resettlement Plans (LARP), as laid down in the ADB‟s Safeguard Policy Statement 2009 (SPS), and ADB’s Guidelines on Monitoring & Evaluation of Resettlement, 2003. The objective of monitoring is to review and assess the implementation of LARP and validate the i) implementation of LARP, ii) payments to DPs, livelihood restoration and any change in their living standards, achievement of resettlement objectives, iii) effectiveness and adequacy of compensation entitlements of the project, iv) the remedial measures to address any issues related to payments and implementation of LARP, and v) institutional arrangements and capacity of PIU. Thus, the monitoring enables the project management to make timely decisions on curative measures needed to implement resettlement effectively, and learn strategic lessons for future policy formulation and planning.

2. External Monitoring Report: This external monitoring report covers an implementation period from January to June 2017 and has been prepared for package I & II of Hassanabdal – Havelian Expressway Project (E-35) which is financed by ADB through Loan 3121 of Tranche 2 of The National Trade Corridor Highways Investment Program (NTCHIP). The report presents review and validation of QIMR which reflect the overall progress up to June 30, 2017.

1.1 Project Background

3. The National Highway Authority (NHA) is currently implementing the package I & II of E-35 project under tranche 2 of the NTCHIP program with the financial assistance of Asian Development Bank (ADB). E-35 is a greenfield project that involved major Land Acquisition and Resettlement (LAR) impacts. Two LARPs of Involuntary Resettlement (IR) category A were prepared by NHA and approved by ADB in November and December 2014 respectively for package 1 and II, which are presently under implementation.

4. The ADB’s Safeguard Policy Statement (2009) requires monitoring of a LARP of category A internally by executing agency and externally by external monitoring agency or an individual expert. The LARP of tranche 2, package I & II of Hassanabdal - Havelian project is being monitored internally by PIU with assistance of Social Safeguard Management Consultant (SSMC) on quarterly basis. As required by SPS, the LARP is being monitored by external monitoring agency/consultant (EMA) on semi-annual basis, hired by NHA to undertake external monitoring of LARP. This is third EMR by EMA which provides the status of LARP implementation, payments to DPs, and construction works and makes recommendations to address issues of concerns related to delivery of compensation of DPs and factors impeding compensation delivery.

1.2 Project Description

5. The Government of Pakistan (GoP) is concentrating on the development of road infrastructure and its major emphasis is on the construction of new motorways/ expressways and improvement of the efficiency of existing roads from single to dual carriageways. The construction of Hassanabdal to Havelian Expressway (E-35) is an effort towards this motive. The project area is reflected in the Fig-I.

2

Fig-1.1: Location Map of E-35 Project

6. The package-I of E-35 has a total length of 20.3 km starting from Burhan Interchange (village Kholian) in District Attock (Punjab) and ending at village Dingi (chainage 20+300 km) in tehsil and district Harripur of Khyber Pakhtunkhaw (KPK). Similarly, Package – II of E-35 has a total length of 19.2 km starting from Jari Kas at village Dingi (chainage 20+300 km) and ends at Maqsooda interchange near Sarai Saleh at the chainage 39+500 km after crossing Hattar Road and Haripur – Khanpur Road 1.

7. Salient Features of Project: Package – I and package - II are the green field project that has significant land acquisition and resettlement (LAR) impacts. The road design of package-I & II includes construction of new 7.3 meter dual carriageway with New Jersey barrier as median; In addition, the PKG-I has 2 interchanges, 3 flyovers and 16 underpasses which will be constructed during implementation. Similarly, the PKG-II also has 2 interchanges, 4 flyovers and 8 underpasses.

8. The Expressway, after construction, will be fenced from both sides and fifteen feet wide service road will also be provided on both sides of expressway for use by local people. Total width of Right of Way (ROW) is 80 meters, which has been fully acquired using the Land Acquisition Act (LAA) of 1894.

9. According to the approved LARP, the Land Acquisition and Resettlement (LAR) impacts of the project (package I & II) were assessed as significant and a Land Acquisition and Resettlement Plan (LARP) was prepared in accordance with ADB’s Safeguard Policy Statement of 2009 (SPS), Pakistan’s Land Acquisition Act of 1894 (LAA) and the updated Land Acquisition and Resettlement Framework. In addition to the LARP, NHA also undertook a detailed land valuation study by the independent valuation experts to determine and ensure compensation of land at full replacement costs as required in ADB’s SPS 2009.

10. During the field monitoring and consultation with the DPs (Annex-A) work conducted by EMA in September, 2017 it was found that NHA followed a section-by-section

3

construction approach in package I & II and construction work started in December 2014 based on the linear maps prepared by NHA indicating delivery of payments to DPs.

4

2 Project Impacts and Status of Implementation

11. NHA is implementing the LARP of package I & II with the assistance of SSMC based at Project Implementation Unit (PIU at Burhan) and Project Management Unit (at NHA headquarters in Islamabad). This external monitoring report provides the review and analysis and validation of the status of LARP implementation and payments to DPs as of 30 June 2017, which is summarized in Table 2.1 below.

12. The total land required for the project is 482.37 acres for the PKG-I and 412.13 acres for PKG-II for interchanges and carriageway. Among the total land of PKG-II, 3.13 acres are the government land owned by provincial departments of education, WAPDA, Sui Northern Gas, Railway and PTCL before transferring it to NHA for the project. However, all the land in PKG I was privately owned. All land awards were made in 2011-12. Among the total land, all the land is acquired for carriage way and interchanges. The implementation of LARPs started in December 2014 after ADB approved the LARPs.

10

Table 2.1: Status of Implementation

S # Impacts as in LARP

Numbers and Quantities impacted

Implementation Status (As of June 2017)

Remarks Quantity

acres Total DPs

Payable Payment (Rs. M)

Payment Made Balance

DPs (No.)

Amount (Rs. M.)

DPs (No.)

Amount (Rs.M.)

A LARP (Package-I)

i) Land Impacts

Land Compensation 482.37 3,797 476.05 3,063 80.7%

465.14 97.7%

734 19.3%

10.91 2.3%

NHA/PIU has made efforts to complete the compensation payment but further delay is expected due to the following;

• Meager amounts of compensation requiring DPs to open bank accounts.

• Transfer of land records

• Absent or untraceable DPs.

• DPs contesting in court for higher compensation.

ii) Non-Land Impacts

a) Crops Compensation

- 2,164 14.22 1,131

(52.3%) 11.866 (83.4%)

1,033 (47.7%)

2.36 (16.6%)

Payment is in progress and NHA/PIU intend to complete it till December, 2017

b) Affected Structures

- 102 85.68 102

(100%) 85.68

(100%) - - Payment completed on 100% basis

d) Affected Trees - 511 8.54 367

(71.8%) 6.55

(75.3%) 144

(28.2%) 1.99

(24.7%) Payment is in progress and NHA/PIU intends to complete it until December, 2017.

Sub-Total (ii) 2,777 108 1,600

(57.6%) 104

(96.3%) 1,177

(32.4%) 4

(3.7%)

iii) Allowances

Allowances –rehabilitation/ livelihood restoration

141 12.40 141

(100%) 12.40

(100%) - - Payment completed 100%

Total-A (i+ii+iii) 6,715 597 4,663 (69%)

582 (97.0%)

1,911 (31%)

14.91 (3.0%)

Rs. 14.91 m still to be paid to 1911 DPs

11

Sr. No.

Impacts as in LARP

Numbers and Quantities impacted

Implementation Status (As of December 2016)

Remarks Quantity acres

Total DPs

Payable Payment (Rs. M)

Payment Made Balance

DPs (No.)

Amount (Rs. M.)

DPs (No.)

Amount (Rs.M.)

B LARP (Package-II)

i) Land Impacts

Land Compensation

412. 4,962 778.31 3,994 80.5%

769.59 98.9%

968 19.5%

08.72 1.1%

NHA/PIU has made good faith efforts to complete the compensation payment but further delay is expected due to the following;

• Meager amounts of compensation but requiring DPs to open up bank accounts.

• Transfer of land records

• Absent or untraceable DPs.

• DPs contesting in court for higher compensation.

ii) Non-Land Impacts

a) Crops Compensation

1,059 7.42 658

(62.1%) 4.843 (65%)

401 (37.9%)

2.579 (35.0%)

Payment is progress and NHA/PIU intends to complete it until December, 2017

b) Affected Structures

106 129.98 106

(100%) 129.98 (100%)

- - Payment completed on 100% basis

d) Affected Trees 197 9.31 145

(73.6%) 9.153

(98.3%) 52

(26.4%) 0.158 (1.7%)

Payment is progress and NHA/PIU intends to complete it until December 30, 2017

Sub-Total (ii) 1,362 147 909

(67.0%) 144

(98.0%) 453

(33.0%) 3

(2.0%)

iii) Allowances

Allowances –rehabilitation/ livelihood restoration

260 19.49 257

(98.8%) 19.37

(99.4%) 3

(1.2%) 0.12

(0.6%) Payment is in progress and NHA/PIU intends to complete it until December, 2017

Total -B (i+ii+iii) 6,584 945 5,160

(78.4%) 933

(98.7%) 1,424

(21.6%) 12

(1.3%) Rs. 12 m still to be paid to 5,160 DPs

12

2.1 Implementation Analysis

13. The table indicates that by 30st June 2017, overall disbursement of compensation (land and non-land assets) is 97% (Rs 582 million from the total Rs. 597 million), in Package-1. The remaining amounts of Rs.15 million will be disbursed among the 1911 DPs. NHA/PIU intend to complete the compensation disbursement until December, 2017. Similarly, the compensation payment and livelihood assistance in Package-II has been disbursed to 98.7% (Rs.933 million out of 945 million) to 78% DPs (5160 from the total 6584). The remaining amount of Rs. 12 million (1.3%) will be paid to 1,424 DPs (22%) is under process. NHA/PIU assured to complete it until December 2017. EMA expects a delay in disbursement of payments due to the amount of payments being meager besides there are other factors such as transfer of land rights, absentee DPs and minors, etc which will cause delay in payments until these issues are resolved.

14. These payments are likely to delay because the DPs are reluctant to open bank accounts through which they can be compensated. Unfortunately the cost of opening bank accounts is higher than small amounts of compensation and the DPs appear not interested in opening up their bank accounts. The DPs are of the view that they should be provided cash compensation in their villages without requiring them to open the bank accounts (see report about DPs views about meager amounts at Annex B).

15. The comparison of compensation disbursement and paid DPs is reflected in Fig: 2.2 for both the PKG-I & PKG-II respectively while fig 2.3 and fig 2.4 indicate the DPs wise payment of impact category for PKG-I & PKG-II respectively Annex- D & E).

0

20

40

60

80

100

Paid DPs Amount disbursed

69 9778 98.7

P e

r c

e n

t

Fig 2.1: Payment Disbursement

Package I

Package-II

13

16. The section below provides analysis into the disbursement of compensation by category of impact, reasons responsible for delay and actions required to complete the payments.

2.2 Land Compensation and Factors Responsible for Delay

17. Package I: The total land required for Package-I was 482.37 acres which has been fully acquired. Payment of land compensation has been achieved by 97.7% (Rs 465.14 million out of total 476.05 million) and about 81% DPs (3063 DPs of total 3797 DPs) have been paid so far. The payment to remaining 19% DPs will be made after completing all procedural requirements of LAA.

18. Package II: In package II land payments of 99.9% (Rs.769.59 million out of 778.31 million) have been made to about 81% DPs (3994 out of 4962). The remaining amount of Rs. 8.72 million (1.1%) to remaining 19% DPs (968 DPs) will be made after completing the LAA procedural requirements of payments. NHA/PIU plans to complete the remaining payments by the end of December, 2017 but will need to expedite the process with help of NHA’s field staff. The major reasons responsible for delay in payments in both packages are the following;

2.3 Meager Amount of Land Payment:

• There are 1303 DPs (both packages) who have meager amount of compensation. The payment is slow due to the requirement of opening up of bank account by DPs. This is a procedural requirement under the Land Acquisition Act of 1894 in which compensation vouchers are issued to DPs for depositing into their bank account from where the DPs can obtain cash compensation.

• The EMA found (through field visits, meeting with PIU and DPs and review of IMR and on-going survey records (completed in all 16 villages of both packages) that the DPs prefer obtaining direct cash compensation given to them in their villages by NHA because the cost of opening a bank account is higher than the amount of compensation itself.

• EMA also found that PIU did the good faith efforts and taken up the issues (through LAC) with BOR of KPK and in response to this BOR allowed LAC to make the payment of meager amount up to Rs.10, 000/- through open cheque. Consequently, there is no need to establish any escrow account for the payment of meager amount in KPK while there is still need to develop the same mechanism in Punjab portion of package-I.

• EMA assessed that the payment of meager amount is slow on the joining of new LAC, hence NHA should speed up the meager amount payment, though NHA assured to complete it until December, 2017.

2.4 Other Reasons of Delay in Payments

19. The EMA found few other reasons, as reported in internal monitoring reports and further reviewed in the field, delaying the compensation that are as below:

• Lack of land transfer record to actual DPs

• Absent DPs, i.e., not traceable

• Lack of ownership titled to DPs

14

• DPs have gone under litigation

• Underage DPs (Juvenile)

20. The Table 2.2 below indicates the number of DPs whose payments are delayed to various afore-mentioned reasons.

Table: 2.2 Reasons for Delay in Payment

Pac

kag

es

Un

-paid

DP

s

Meager amount

Lack of Record

Transfer

Lack of Titled

Ownership

Absent DPs

Mortgage land

DPs under

Litigation

Lack of Bank

Account & CNIC

I 738 566 55 52 40 1 6 4

II 968 737 42 21 103 3 15 75

21. The EMA reviewed these cases and found that NHA made the following legal and good faith efforts in its attempts to make payments to DPs:

a) Contacted DPs of meager amount and informed them about efforts being made to compensate them in cash. A thorough survey by PIU (through SSMC) in August and September, 2016 about views of DPs has been conducted in this regard.

b) NHA is committed to make payments to DPs contesting in the court for higher payments fully in accordance with court decisions as soon as made.

c) NHA is working closely with revenue department to get the land transfer record corrected/updated following which the DPs will be compensated and verified by EMA.

d) NHA and SSMC are making efforts by facilitating DPs in obtaining their CNIC. They will be compensated after they are provided with CNIC.

e) NHA has issued public notices in local newspapers to untraceable DPs and fixed public notices in villages and advertised contact details of officials who the DPs can contact for payments.

f) NHA deposited all compensation amounts in the district treasury for disbursement to DPs as their cases are processed.

22. NHA did good faith efforts to complete 100% payment to DPs as reflected in the latest IMR and evidence attached as Annex B&C. EMA recommends NHA to follow the guidance notes and formats prepared by ADB in consultation with NHA to document the systematic and transparent process that have been used by NHA in contacting the DPs for NHA’s efforts to make 100% payments.

23. Transfer of Government Land: In package II about 3.13 acres of total land acquired (412.13 acres), is owned by different government departments, e.g. Education department and federal department like WAPDA, Sui Northern Gas, Railway and PTCL. The process of transfer of government land to NHA is under process and is expected to be transferred in December 2017. The EMA recommends that NHA/PIU should make intensive follow up with the concerned departments and the process must be monitored and reported in the IMR.

15

2.5 Payment of Non-land Assets

24. The status of payment of non-land assets as reviewed and verified by EMA is summarized below:

2.6 Payment for the Structures

25. A total of structures including residential, commercial, cattle yards, community/public structures and miscellaneous structures including water resources owned by 102 DPs who were entitled to receive Rs. 85.679 million as compensation for Package-I. All the payment has been disbursed to all 102 (100%) DPs. As far as the Package-II is concerned, that total amount of compensation for loss of residential/ commercial structures was Rs. 129.98 million payable to 106 DPs. The entire amount has been disbursed among 106 DPs (100%) and nothing is pending in both the PKGs regarding the payment of structures.

2.7 Payment for the Crops

26. A total of Rs 14.22 million to be paid to 2164 DPs. Approximately 83% (11.31 million) of the funds has been disbursed to 52% DPs (1131 out of 2164). The remaining 48% (1033 DPs) are still waiting for the payment. The compensation payment is delayed due to small amounts of payments to individual DPs (termed as meager and other legal and administrative impediments as reflected in the internal monitoring reports) as discussed earlier. For Package-II, a total number of 1,059 DPs had to be paid an amount of Rs. 7.42 million. Currently (till June 30, 2017) 658 DPs (62%) have been paid an amount of Rs. 4.843 million (65.0 %). The remaining 401 DPs (38 %) are yet to be paid

27. However NHA has a plan to complete the crop compensation to DPs up to the end of December 2017, which requires close monitoring and reporting in the IMR (validated by EMA).

2.8 Payment for the Trees

28. An amount of Rs.8.54 million was to be paid to 511 DPs for Package-I. The EMA found that as per internal monitoring report and field verification, Rs. 6.55 million (75%) have been disbursed among 367 DPs (71.8%). The remaining 144 DPs (28.2%) are still waiting for the payment.

29. In case of payment at Package-II, a total of 197 DPs had to be paid an amount of Rs. 9.31 million for the loss of trees. As per IMR and field verification, 145 DPs (74%) have been paid an amount of Rs. 9.153 million (98 %). The remaining 52 DPs (26 %) are yet to be paid 2% of the total amount. NHA confirmed to complete the payments by end of December 2017. EMA recommends that this to be monitored and reported in periodic internal monitoring reports by NHA/PIU.

2.9 Payment of Allowances - Shifting, Vulnerable, Employment, Electricity and Livelihood Rehabilitation Allowances

30. In case of allowances payment for Package-I, 141 DPs had to be paid an amount of Rs. 12.40 million. However, as per field situation, 100% DPs (141 in number) have received the allowance payment (Rs. 12.40 million) on account of assistance for livelihood restoration, vulnerability, employment loss, electricity, house rent and relocation assistance. In case of Package-II, there are 260 DPs to be paid Rs. 19.49 million as allowances for shifting, vulnerability, employment loss, electricity, house rent

16

and livelihood rehabilitation allowances. The EMA verified that NHA has paid Rs. 19.37 million (99%) to 257 DPs (99%). The remaining 3 DPs (1%) are still waiting for the payment. NHA assured to complete the remaining payments by end of December 2017. EMA recommends that this is to be monitored and reported in periodic internal monitoring reports by NHA/PIU.

17

3 Institutional Arrangements for Land and Resettlement Activities

31. The NHA has kept all the institutional arrangements as mentioned in the LARP on board for addressing the land acquisition and resettlement requirements. The detail is discussed as under;

3.1 Environment Afforestation Land and Social (EALS)

32. NHA established an Environment Afforestation Land and Social (EALS) wing at Headquarter. The EALS is headed by the General Manager (GM), assisted by the land, environment and social staff. The EALS is responsible for preparing, implementing, monitoring, disclosing, and submitting reports to ADB.

3.2 Project Implementation Unit (PIU)

33. NHA has established a Project Implementation Unit (PIU) under the General Manager E-35 in Burhan. The PIU presently comprises of a GM, Project Director, Assistant Director (Engineering), Deputy Director (Land) and Land Acquisition Collector (LAC) with support of land staff. PIU is responsible to prepare and implement the safeguard documents (through SSMC) and submit to ADB though (EALS).

3.3 Grievances Redress Mechanism

34. A grievance redress mechanism has been established in the project since March September 21, 2015 (Annex-F). The Grievance Redress Committee is headed by the PD E-35 and the members are Deputy Director (land), Deputy Director (Const), LAC (E-35) assisted by concerned Patwari, Resettlement Specialist and Social Mobilizer (male & female).

35. Presently, 229 complaints were received from the DPs throughout the project cycle till June 30, 2017. The detail is given in Table 3.1. Among registered complaints, 219 complaints were resolved while only 10 complaints including 6 are the court cases, are still lying pending. These registered complaints are mostly related to the assessment of prices by the Provincial Revenue Departments while the others were related to civil work. Similarly, 382 complaints were received from the Package-II and all got resolved except 18, which are lying pending as reflected in Table 3.2. Most of the complaints also related to assessment of the prices.

Table 3.1: Details of Registered Complaints for Package-I

S# Nature of

Complaints

Reported Complaints

(No)

Number of complaint resolved

Remarks

1 Price Assessment 201 201

Compensation assessment was based on the valuation study and unit rate estimated is equal to the replacement cost of lost item/ asset.

2 Court cases 6 0 None of court cases is resolved.

3 Access to passages across the Motorway

9 9

18

S# Nature of

Complaints

Reported Complaints

(No)

Number of complaint resolved

Remarks

4 Service Road 1 1

5 Pipe culvert 1 1

6 Protection wall 1 1 NHA constructed the protection wall.

7 Removal of Solid Waste from Agricultural Field

1 0 Complaint is not resolved yet. The efforts are made to resolve the complaint.

8 Compensation Issue

3 2 One compensation issue was not resolved

9 Calculation Errors in Revenue Record

5 5

10

Demand of construction of Interchange and construction of Service Road

1 1

Total 229 219 10 complaints were not resolved including 6 are court cases

Table 3.2: Details of Registered Complaints for Package-II

S# Nature of

Complaints

Reported Complaints

(No)

Number of

complaint resolved

Remarks

1 Price Assessment 341 341

Compensation assessment was based on the valuation study and unit rate estimated is equal to the replacement cost of lost item/ asset.

2 Court cases 15 0 None of court cases is resolved.

2 Access to passages across the Motorway

4 4

3 Protection wall 3 3 NHA constructed the protection wall.

4 Loss of business 2 2 Complaint is not resolved yet. The efforts are made to resolve the complaint.

5 Compensation Issue 9 6 Three are still pending.

6 Calculation Errors in Revenue Record

8 8

Total 382 364 18 complaints were not resolved

19

36. EMA found (during the field visits) that most of the DPs’ shared concerns on the land prices which to them were assessed as below the market rate by Provincial Revenue Department. The EMA informed such DPs that the prices were assessed/ fixed based on average market rate of registered land transactions (carried out during the year preceding the date of notification of the section 4 of LAA. Later on an independent land valuation study conducted by independent valuation experts also determined the market rate of land in light of international valuation standards. The study concluded that land prices awarded by BOR either met the full replacement costs of were very close to this standard. Nevertheless, DPs wished for better price although they did not have supporting evidence to claim higher compensation rates.

37. Some DPs verbal complained during field visits about access route, under-pass, delay in compensation of meager payments and the payment for the additional areas. People also complained that no one is visiting them to whom they can register their complaints. SSMC were asked and they endorsed that owing to the unavailability of transport they are not frequently visiting the project area, the last visit they paid to the project area in May 2017. That’s why only two complaints were registered during the reporting period. EMA recommends that transport must be provided to SSMC on immediate basis so that the field activities could not suffer. The availability of the vehicle must be monitored and reported in the IMR.

38. EMA thoroughly reviewed the complained register and found that the entry was not made properly, i.e., only the complained was registered but what action taken and current status in most of the cases were blank. EMA could not find the minutes of the meeting of the grievance committee, hardly the SSMC presented few minutes of meeting, and even from last couple of months none of the GRC meeting was held irrespective of the facts that DPs are having lot of complaints.

39. SSMC meets with DPs and records their concerns and take them to the officials of grievance redress committee for redressal. But their payments continue to be impeded. The EMA recommends that PIU and the contractors must try to ensure availability of alternate access to DPs and locals and meaningful efforts made to make payment of meager payments to DPs. Actions and progress of meager payments must be reported in IMRs and further monitored/validated by EMA.

40. EMA recommends that PIU and the contractors to take up the complaints (those are related to civil work). The process must be monitored and reported in the IMR.

3.4 Formation of Displaced Persons Committees (DPCs)

41. EMA found through IMR, discussion with the PIU, SSMC and DPs during the field visits that DPC exists in each village. These committees are taken on-board by the project staff in addressing the grievances of the DPs at village level and also coordinating with the PIU in dispute resolution and for the smooth running of project activities. EMA also found that the women committees are existed at village level but women DPC is not stated in the IMR.

42. EMA found that that few DPs do not know about the DPC, hence, EMA recommends that well-structured awareness campaign must be launched to create the awareness among the men and women to make the DPC more responsive and effective.

3.5 Social Safeguards Management Consultant (SSMC)

43. In order to effectively implement the LARP and address the social safeguard issues, NHA employed SSMC. SSMC is staffed by Resettlement Specialist, Gender Specialist,

20

MIS/ M&E and Social Mobilizers and is assisting NHA/ PIU in the LARP implementation and monitoring and capacity building in LAR. The understanding of SSMC staff about safeguard requirements of loan and procedural matters of LAA pertaining to disbursement of payment to DPs needs improvement.

44. The field movement, interaction with DPs and writing of daily visit report, coordination and reporting mechanism also need improvement. The EMA recommends a refresher workshop for PIU on payment related procedures and issues of LAA, SPS 2009 and LARP provisions/implementation requirements of the project. PIU should also document best practice case studies on resettlement and rehabilitation, compensation delivery, women emancipation cases, consultations and grievance management, employment creation and productive utilization of compensation money, etc.

45. EMA also found that management information system is now well in place but not all the DPs have been entered in the MIS system. There are about 1,000 DPs whose data still needs to be computerized. However with updating of MIS data continuing on regular basis, it is expected that PIU will be able to complete the MIS of all DPs until the end of October, 2017. The information about land acquisition for carriageway and interchanges needs to be clearly reflected in the MIS. Hence, EMA recommends that MIS specialist should be provided more resources (support of data entry person) to complete the MIS.

46. EMA also found that the contract of SSMC is expired from September 30, 2017 but the payment to DPs is still pending. Hence, EMA recommends that social mobilization expert must be recruited to facilitate the DPs to have access on GRC, assist the NHA/PIU in resolving the DP’s issues including the compensation payment.

3.6 Delay in Salary for SSMC’s staff

47. EMA also found that the staffs are not receiving their salaries timely, i.e., their salaries are delayed by 7 months. It has been found that the staff is very frustrated owing to non-payment, they are unable to meet their daily expenses as nobody from the market borrow them the food stuff. The non-payment of salaries has adverse impact on the performance of SSMC’s staffs. EMA recommends analyzing the contract made between NHA and SSMC to find out payment arrangement, mode and timing of payment as to why payments are so delayed. In addition, NHA/PIU will ensure that all the SSMC staffs receive salaries on the dates as specified in the contract and this should be monitored internally by PIU and validated by EMA.

48. EMA found (through SSMC) that invoices are not submitted timely by SSMC to NHA, the traditional lethargy is at the end of SSMC in the submission of claim, ultimately the staff is suffering.

21

4 Consultation and Information Disclosure

49. PIU is conducting consultations with DPs since the LARP planning and implementation. EMA assessed through the focus group discussion held with 101 DPs that status of awareness among the DPs regarding the compensation payment and livelihood assistances was found 100%. The DPs are generally happy with compensation payments and they made the good use of compensation payment like, i) purchased alternate land, ii) constructed a new houses, iii) started business, iv) part of the amount spent on children education, v) performed Hajj, and vi) arranged the marriages of their children.

50. However, as reported in the IMR the consultation meetings are organized only 4 villages in Packages I where 81 DPs participated while in Package II only one meeting was and 4 DPs were consulted during the reporting periods.

51. EMA found that the meetings are not held in each village during the reporting period, even none of the meeting is held in Packages II during the month of April and July, 2017. On asking the reason for low frequency of the meeting, SSMC told that they do not have the transport, as already provided vehicle to them has taken back from PIU/NHA. EMA also found that consultation section is not reflected in the main text of the IMR; simply the participants list is annexed in the report. EMA recommends that these meetings need to be happened as meaningful, as most of the DPs are still not clear regarding the schedule of payment. Hence, PIU to inform the DPs about expected schedule of payment of meager amount. EMA also recommends that PIU should organize the meetings in routine and DPs concerns should be properly documented in the IMR, as this part is lacking in the IMR of both the packages.

52. In terms of gender perspective, the LARP also identified the women DPs in term of loss of their assets. Like, male DPs the women are also receiving their payment.

4.1 Employment Opportunities

53. The LARP provisioned for employment of local laborers and members of AFs. PIU has been follow up with contractors in providing job opportunities to locals. The EMA reviewed the record of PIU and visited the project sites and found that project contractor has employed a total 224 people of which 50% (112 of the total 224) work force has been employed from project area. Hiring of unskilled laborers from local project area is monitored by PIU every month.

4.2 Stakeholders Consultations and assessment of DPs Feedback

54. A proper questionnaire was established to assess the views of the DPs regarding the compensation payment, uses of the compensation amount and detail is reflected in the Table 4.1. A total of 101 DPs were contacted during the field visits. Among the total contacted DPs, 73 have been received their complete compensation payment and livelihood assistance (in the form of allowances) while 28 DPs were unpaid and their payment was delayed due to acquisition of additional land and legal and administrative impediments. The DPs responses in term of use of compensation payment, concern about the assessment procedure, and awareness about the GRM and DPCs.

22

Table 4.1: Responses of the Contacted DPs

S# Indicators Number of

Respondents Percentage of the

Respondents

1 Status of awareness regarding the compensation payment and livelihood assistances

101 100

2 Constructed the houses 25 25

3 Arrange the marriages of their children 15 15

4 Households use (in routine expenses) 19 19

5 Purchased land 24 24

6 Established the business 08 07

7 Miscellaneous use 10 10

8 Compensation rate was assessed on lower side

101 100

9 DPs wants the payment for the meager amount 21 100

10 Awareness level about the GRM 86 85

11 Awareness about the DPCs 77 76

55. Table indicates that 100% DPs have the awareness about their compensation payment and livelihood assistances. The DPs are generally happy with compensation payments and they made the good use of compensation payment like, 24% of the DPs purchased alternate land to continue their farming activities, 25% of the DPs constructed new houses, 7% DPs started business, 15% arranged the marriages of their children, 19% of the DPs spent their compensation amount on the routine households expenses and remaining 10% of the DPs spent the amount on miscellaneous expenses like paid back their loan to bank, buy motorbike and performed Umera/Hajj.

56. Survey also reveals that all the contacted 101 DPs were not satisfied over the prices assessed by the Provincial Revenue Department. The complainants have been informed that the prices were assessed/ fixed on the basis of average of the transactions carried out during the last one year and including an independent land valuation study that they were allowed an opportunity by the Land Collector to record the grievances prior to announcement of award.

57. All 21 contacted DPs wants to be compensated in cash for the meager amount payment but not through district treasury vouchers. NHA in consultation with district revenue authority/Deputy Commissioner is in the process of setting up the issue of meager amount to make the cash payments to DPs.

58. As per field investigation, 85% DPs have the knowledge about the GRC while only 15% are unaware about the grievance redress system. Similarly, 76% of the DPs have the knowledge about the existence of DPCs in their respective villages.

59. In addition, the DPs and local community raised their concerns during the focus group discussion, are illustrated as in Table 4.2.

23

Table 4.2: DPs and local community Concerns about the Project

S# Village DPs Concerns

1 Mir Pur

• Muhammad Sarfraz s/o Ghulam Sarwar & Tanveer Kousar and Haji Maqsoor ur Rehman did get the compensation

• Voucher of Farzana Shaheen d/o Sher Afzal has been lost by the department and she is waiting for the compensation.

2 Dingi-

Motian-Jhar • The underpass is not properly constructed so water is standing during

the rain and movements of people are blocked.

3 Seria Bandi

• Meager amount must be made through cash compensation.

• Malik Amir reported that the land has been acquired but no compensation payment is made yet.

• Qari Muhammad Shoaib told that NHA served the notice that his Madressa will be dismantled as per policy it is falling in the range of 2km from motorway. Qari told that he has obtained the NOC for the construction of Madressa if there was any policy why did not he was informed earlier, now he has spent more than 10 million rupees and government intends to dismantle it.

4 Padera • Muhammad Younas wants the cash payment for the meager amount.

• Rd, 4+800 to RD 6+200 need the service road.

• Permanent jobs must be given to DPs on the project.

5 Mohri • The underpass is not cleaned hence the movements are hindered during the rainy season.

6 Kanwan

• Khalid s/o Ayub Khan is waiting for the compensation.

• Haider Zaman s/ Shah Zaman is waiting for the payment of meager amount.

• The rain water is entering in the school, hence the contractor must be instructed to make the arrangement in this regard.

• Gulzar s/o Lal Baig did not get the compensation for his Shamlot.

• The local road is damaged by the contractor hence it must be repaired.

24

5 Conclusions

60. Based on the review and field verification, the EMA concludes that land for carriageway and interchanges have been fully acquired.

61. Likewise compensation disbursement of carriageway and 2 interchanges has been completed by 97% (Rs 582 million from the total Rs. 597 million) to 69% DPs for Package-I. Similarly, the compensation payment for Package-II has been disbursed to 98.7% (Rs.933 million out of 945 million) and the payment has been delivered to 78% of the DPs.

62. NHA has generally demonstrated good faith efforts in its attempt to complete 100% payment to all the DPs. However due to some legal and administrative impediments there are DPs whose payment is either slow or stuck. The efforts for the disbursement of payment to DPs (where the payments unfortunately found to be stuck due to some legal and administrative impediments) seems to be consistent with the ADB’s Safeguard Policy Statement (SPS), 2009 related to disbursement of compensation and initiation of construction work.

63. The institutional arrangements and consultation and grievance redress mechanisms as mentioned in the approved LARP are in place. However SSMC’s staff needs to more training and resources to put in place an achievable work plan, improve outreach to DPs, timely reporting of periodical reports, meaningful consultation, proper functioning of GRC, fully functional management information system, which is lacking, a more experienced and qualified resettlement specialist, well oriented team of social mobilizers and coordination require improvement.

64. Almost all the DPs showed their concerns pertain to the assessment of prices by the Provincial Revenue Departments. The complainants have been informed that the prices were assessed/ fixed on the basis of average of the transactions carried out during the last one year and including an independent land valuation study that they were allowed an opportunity by the Land Collector to record the grievances prior to announcement of award.

65. Status of awareness among the DPs regarding the compensation payment and livelihood assistances was found 100%. The DPs are generally happy with compensation payments and they made the good use of compensation payment like, i) purchased alternate land, ii) constructed a new houses, iii) started business, iv) part of the amount spent on children education, v) performed Hajj, and vi) arranged the marriages of their children.

66. The SSMC’s staff is frustrated due to the non-payment of monthly salaries from last 7 months which ultimately have impacts on their performance. Additionally, the resources especially the vehicle is not available for field visit eventually the consultations with the DPs are not held as per schedule.

67. The contract of SSMC is expired from September 30, 2017 but the payment to DPs is still pending. Hence, without the support of social mobilization staff it become hard to facilitate the DPs in payment disbursement.

25

6 Recommendations

68. On the bases of above-mentioned LARP implementation progress, following actions are recommended for delivery of undisbursed payments to DPs having legal and administrative impediments:

a. In case of compensation and rehabilitation allowances, PIU need to maintain a close liaison with revuene department facilitaitng the DPs in completing the documentation/ claim files required eligiblity of payment.

b. The unpaid DPs due to meager amounts need to be paid in cash as per their preference as BOR standing order 28 (Punjab) and revenue circular 54 (KPK) allows cash compensation to DPs in villages.

c. NHA need to continue its efforts to make the payment to DPs of meager compensation and also continues follow up with Provincial board of revenue for appropriate compensation mechanism which may facilitate payments to DPs of meager amount expeditiously. The progress of payment should be provided in the monthly progress report, and QIMR (validation by EMA).

d. PIU and revenue department must also continue to facilitate payment of DPs who have problems with CNIC, correction in names/titles and inheritance. Progress on these cases needs to be reported in monitoring reports and verified by EMA;

e. PIU alone lacks the capacity in term of staff strength to address compensation matters and needs support of Social Mobilization staff in addressing the compensation matter and safeguards monitoring reports and compliance requirements. Hence, Social Mobilization Expert must be inducted in this regard.

f. EMA recommends analyzing the contract made between NHA and SSMC to find out payment arrangement, mode and timing of payment as to why payments are so delayed. A joint visit of PIU, SSMC and ADB (for supervises the implementation to ensure consistency of procedures adopted with ADB’s policy) should be undertaken to identify the items that are missing which impede SSMC’s work and performance. In addition, NHA/PIU will ensure that all the SSMC staffs receive salaries on the dates as specified in the contract and this should be monitored internally by PIU and validated by EMA.

g. Consultations with DPs must also continue on regular basis to facilitate them in resolving any grievances and issues pertinent to payment of meager amounts on other payments pending due CNIC and problems with land records, etc.

26

Table 6.1: Proposed Action Plan

S# Impact/Indicator Proposed Actions Timeline Responsibility Remark

1 Continuity in facilitation

In the absence of SSMC, social mobilization staff must be recruited to facilitate the DPs to have access on GRC and resolving of their issues

October 31, 2017

PIU/NHA

Ensure that DPs issues are completely resolved

2 Payment of meager amount

• Explore the mechanism for cash payment

• Effort should be continued to make the compensation payment of meager amount for the DPs of the Punjab portion

• May be taken into confidence to NHA’s management

December, 2017

PIU & LAC

Ensure the 100% payment of meager amount to all the DPs

3 Regularize the Salaries of SSMC staff

• Analyzing the contract made between NHA and SSMC

• SSMC staff is very frustrated owing to the non-payment of their salaries from last 7 months; hence their salaries must be regularized.

On-going activity

PIU, SSMC & ADB

Ensure the regularization of salaries

4 Strengthening of GRM

• Registration of verbal complaints

• Update the complaint register

• Record the minutes of each GRC meeting

• Organize the GRC meeting on regular basis

• Coordination with the DPC at village level

On-going activity

PIU Ensure the strengthening of GRM

5 Strengthening of DPC

• Regular interaction with the DPC

• Explore the roles and responsibilities of DPC methodology

• Entertain the issues raised by the DPC

On-going activity

PIU Ensure the strengthening of DPC

27

S# Impact/Indicator Proposed Actions Timeline Responsibility Remark

6 Arranging the consultation on regular basis

• PIU coordinate with the DPC and other DPs to arrange the regular meeting

• Properly record the minutes of meetings

• Decisions followed by the implementation must be discussed in the forth-coming meeting

On-going activity

PIU Ensure the participants of DPs

7 Updating the Management Information System

• All the computerized data must be transferred to system.

• The data must be entered on daily basis and backlog must be cleared immediately

• Progress of MIS must be monitored in routine

October 31, 2017

PIU Ensure the updating of MIS

8

Resolving of the DPs concerns for the non-inclusion of the land and .delay in payment etc. highlighted in Table 4.2

• PIU investigate the matters with the coordination of DPC

• Prepare the minutes of the meetings

December, 2017

PIU Ensure to resolve the issues

9

Provision of access routes and restoration of irrigation sources

• PIU investigate the matter through the Construction supervision consultant

• Minutes of the meeting must be prepared

October 2017 PIU,CSC& Contractor

Ensure to resolve the issue

28

Annexure – A

List of Consultations with DPCs/ DPs Hassanabdal – Havelian Expressway E-35

S # Date Village No of

participants Package Name of participant Remarks

1.

Sep 16,

2017

Padara 08 01

- Mr. Muhammad Younas - Mr. Haji Ishaq - Mr. Muhammad Sadaqat - Mr. Muhammad Umar - Mr. Muhammad Zubair - Mr. Muhammad Anwar - Mr. Shair Ahmad - Mr. Muhammad Noor

2.

Sep 16,

2017

Mohri 17 01

- Mr. Shabir Ahmad - Mr. Muhammad Riaz - Mr. Gul Rehman - Mr. Abdul Waheed - Mr. Haji Rauf - Mr. Abdul Rehman - Mr. Shair Ahmad - Mr. Dost Muhammad - Mr. Muhammad Akram - Mr. Abdul Hameed - Mr. Ashraf - Mr. Pir Muhammad - Mr. Mirza Khan - Mr. Banaras Khan - Mr. Fazal Khan - Mr. Rostum Khan - Mr. Raziq Khan

3.

Sep 16,

2017

Kanwan 14 01

- Mr. Haji Safdar - Mr. Mehboob - Mr. Khalid Mehmood - Mr. Haydar Zaman - Mr. Gulzar - Mr. Banaras Khan - Mr. Muhammad Yaseen - Mr. Gul Zaman - Mr. Noor Ahmad - Mr. Fakhar Zaman - Mr. Nasir - Mr. Noor Zaman - Mr. Muhammad Miskeen - Mr. Kamar Zaman

4.

Sep 16,

2017

Motian/Dingi 12 01

- Mr. Babu Abdul Rauf - Mr. Haji M. Younas - Mr. Muhammad Ismail - Mr. Muhammad Safeer - Mr. Muhammad Ashraf - Mr. Raja Tahir - Mr. Muhammad Waseem

29

S # Date Village No of

participants Package Name of participant Remarks

- Mr. Muhammad Ashraf - Mr. Muhammad Khalid - Mr. Rabnawaz - Mr. Muhammad Jamshed - Mr. Muhammad Zaheer

5.

Sep 16,

2017

Kot Najibullah

08 02

- Mr. Ramtullah - Mr. Muhammad Rashid - Mr. Muhammad Yaqoob - Mr. Muhammad Iltaf - Mr. Haji Jamal Din - Mr. Khouram Shezad - Mr. Jameel Ahmad - Mr. Raheem

6.

Sep 16,

2017

Seria 09 02

- Mr. Haji Monsif Khan - Mr. Dilawar Khan - Mr. Shabeer - Mr. Gul Zaman - Mr. Khan Afsar - Mr. Dost Muhammad - Mr. Sajid Khan - Mr. Noor Ahmad - Mr. Ali Ahmad

7.

Sep 16,

2017

Seria Bandi 11 02

- Malik Safdar - Mr. Muhammad Nawaz - Mr. Muhammad Liaqat - Mr. Noman Ali - Mr. Sheriayar - Mr. Anwar - Mr. Molana Qari M.

Shoib - Malik Anwar - Mr. Alim Khan - Mr. Gul Zaman - Mr. Shair Zaman

8.

Sep 16,

2017

Mir Pur 12 02

- Mr. Zahid Mehmood - Mr. Assad Iqbal - Mr. Malik Noor Ahmad - Mr. Azar Hussain - Mr. Abdul Aziz - Mr. Safdar - Mr. Sarfiraz (Conslar UC) - Mr, Raza Mehmood - Mr. Muhammad Saleem - Mr. Khalid Mehmood - Mr. Zakir Hussain - Mr. Sharafat Ali

30

Annexure – B

Survey to Obtain the Views of DPs on Meager Amount

31

32

33

34

Annexure – C

Effort made by NHA for 100% payment

35

36

37

38

Display Banner for Payment

39

Annexure-D:

Status of Payment of Package-I

Sr. No.

Village Affected

Land (Kanal)

No of DPs Total

Total Amount (Rs.)

Amount Disbursed

(Rs.)

Balance Amount

(Rs.)

1 Jabar 381.55 175 10,366,901 9,080,242 1,286,659

2 Padarah 244.85 226 17,862,233 16,315,932 1,546,301

3 Kala Katha 192.65 143 4,641,096 3,797,804 843,292

4 KhoiDara 202.05 320 5,514,341 4,992,089 522,252

5 Dar Chitti 117.8 535 1,197,616 372,845 824,771

6 Motian 465.45 645 161,522,078 159,844,459 1,677,619

8 Jar 145.1 71 22,412,693 21,698,906 713,787

7 Dingi 145.2 52 34,128,479 34,106,479 22,000

9 Aamghah 209.05 449 15,003,372 14,208,824 794,548

10 Kohlian 964.35 258 94,147,050 93,498,977 648,073

11 Kanwan 258.95 320 38,283,500 38,291,913 -8,413

12 BallarJogi 262.45 314 42,392,220 42,270,692 121,528

13 Bedian 59.75 75 6,835,025 6,395,340 439,685

14 Mohree 140.45 168 14,584,300 13,784,906 799,394

15 Barwal 69.95 46 7,155,875 6,479,660 676,215

Total 3859.6 3797 476,046,779 465,139,068 10,907,711

Mouza-wise summary of Payment for Affected Structures

Sr. No

Name of Mouza DP Nos. Total

Amount (Rs)

Amount Disbursed

(Rs)

Balance Amount (Rs)

1 Jabar 6 1,408,640 1,408,640 -

2 Padarah 19 9,699,009 9,699,009 -

3 Kala Katha 2 218,608 218,608 -

4 KhoiDara 10 12,787,741 12,787,741 -

5 Dar Chitti 6 4,126,413 4,126,413 -

6 Motian 15 17,131,416 17,131,416 -

7 Jar 5 5,049,715 5,049,715 -

8 Dingi 1 192,473 192,473 -

9 Aamghah 2 2,188,775 2,188,775 -

10 Kohlian 2 447,274 447,274 -

11 Kanwan 16 17,296,946 17,296,946 -

12 BallarJogi 4 2,172,554 2,172,554 -

13 Bedian 4 3,802,446 3,802,446 -

14 Mohree 7 7,926,866 7,926,866 -

15 Barwal 3 1,230,367 1,188,772 41,595

Total 102 85,679,243 85,637,648 41,595

*Recovery of amount Rs.1,474,550 has to be made in Moza Dar-Chithi by LAC (KP) E-35

40

Mouza-wise summary of Payment for Affected Trees

Sr. No.

Name of Mouza

No. of DPs

No. of DPs paid

No. of DPs Unpaid

Compensation Amount

(Rs)

Disbursed Amount (Rs)

1 Jabar 22 16 6 437,316 361,922

2 Padarah 28 16 12 412,977 288,018

3 Kala Katha 19 15 4 787,646 565,322

4 KhoiDara 20 15 5 827,051 714,666

5 Dar Chitti 20 8 12 461,152 228,380

6 Motian 38 27 11 624,167 241,759

7 Jar 4 0 4 64,554 43,505

8 Dingi 2 0 2 14,448 1,072

9 Aamghah 15 10 5 317,090 225,665

10 Kohlian 65 30 35 767,681 728,550

11 Kanwan 99 91 8 1,433,833 1,407,725

12 BallarJogi 99 88 11 1,288,107 985,377

13 Bedian 26 15 11 607,068 474,970

14 Mohree 46 32 14 300,121 272,414

15 Barwal 8 4 4 198,875 10,295

Total 511 367 144 8,542,086 6,549,640

Payment for Crops

Sr. No.

Name of Mouza Compensation Amount (Rs)

Disbursed Amount (Rs)

1 Jabar 1,197,120 1,071,086

2 Padarah 1,032,480 789,593

3 Kala Katha 1,031,520 405,410

4 KhoiDara 978,720 919,335

5 Dar Chitti 197,760 30,727

6 Motian 4,310,400 4,050,105

7 Jar 1,323,840 1,196,003

8 Dingi 1,386,240 1,289,453

9 Aamgah 558,150 278,309

10 Kohlian 400,023 357,257

11 Kanwan 556,393 455,059

12 BallarJogi 925,911 789,369

13 Bedian 91,646 65,022

14 Mohree 198,798 159,549

15 Barwal 33,737 9,923

Total 14,222,738 11,866,200

41

Allowances (Vulnerable DP’s, affected structures DP’s &Labours)

Sr. No.

Village Total No of DPs

No of DPs PAID

% of DPs PAID

Remaining DPs

Total Amount

(Rs)

Amount Disbursed

(Rs.)

1 Jabar 9 9 100 - 405,437 405,437

2 Padarah 19 19 100 - 1,832,062 1,832,062

3 Kala Katha 4 4 100 - 191,736 191,736

4 KhoiDara 40 40 100 - 5,940,333 5,940,333

6 Dar Chitti 1 1 100 - 64,205 64,205

5 Motian 33 33 100 - 2,699,374 2,699,374

7 Jar 16 16 100 - 693,461 693,461

8 Dingi 9 9 100 - 164,468 164,468

9 Aamghah 8 8 100 - 334,116 334,116

10 Kohlian 2 2 100 21,605 21,605

11 Barwal 1 1 100 - 130,504 130,504

Total 141 141 12,477,301 12,477,301

42

Annexure – E

Payment Status of Package-II

Village-wise summary of Awarded Land

Sr. No.

Village Affected

Land (Kanal)

No of DPs Total

Amount (Rs.)

Amount Disbursed

Rs.

Balanced Amount

Rs. Total Paid

1 Monan 52 96 79 3,880,788 3,259,511 621,277

2 Murad Abad 102 105 64 5,455,760 5,017,654 438,106

3 Derwesh 76 250 132 16,976,028 15,983,968 992,060

4 Ali Khan 131 462 344 20,743,337 20,491,575 251,762

5 Dhoian Khushki

256 358 345 30,017,328 29,649,045 368,283

6 Shah Mohammad

421 191 190 219,414,576 217,847,443 1,567,133

8 Chechian 42 84 69 6,158,640 6,031,856 126,784

7 Dhedhar 145 308 296 68,242,524 67,566,748 675,776

9 Seria 423 370 352 63,417,698 62,707,928 709,770

10 BandiSeria 116 143 121 30,386,528 29,646,031 740,497

11 Mirpur 290 814 575 21,566,357 21,193,114 373,243

12 Kot Najibullah 647 558 555 215,588,017 214,892,137 695,880

13 Ganja Kamala 360 634 574 64,778,293 64,315,416 462,877

14 SaraiSaleh 235 589 298 11,687,893 10,987,574 700,319

Total 3296 4962 3,994 778,313,767 769,590,000 8,723,767

43

Mouza-wise summary of Payment for Affected Trees

a) Non-Fruit Trees

Sr. No.

Name of Mouza No. of DPs

No. of DPs paid

No. of DPs

Unpaid

Compensation Amount

Disbursed Amount

(Rs) (Rs)

1 Monan 18 14 4 278,796 275,864

2 Murad Abad 25 22 3 274,534 269,688

3 Derwesh 4 0 4 58,680 55,500

4 Ali Khan 19 15 4 481734 478,733

5 DhoianKhushki 3 3 0 122,411 122,411

6 Shah Mohammad 11 7 4 265,050 263,750

7 Chechian 3 1 2 72,528 71,206

8 Dhedhar 5 1 4 48,351 45,989

9 Seria 3 3 0 137,113 137,113

10 BandiSeria 15 13 2 323,311 319,692

11 Mirpur 18 12 6 267,514 262,581

12 KotNajibullah 14 6 8 154,714 153,115

13 Ganja Kamala 10 9 1 93,043 92,153

14 SaraiSaleh 20 18 2 249,448 246,795

Total 168 124 44 2,827,227 2,794,590

b) Fruit Trees

Sr. No.

Name of Mouza No. of DPs

No. of DPs paid

No. of DPs

Unpaid

Compensation Amount

(Rs)

Disbursed Amount

(Rs)

1 Monan 4 3 1 291,165 249,525

2 Murad Abad 5 4 1 203,930 146,330

3 Derwesh 2 - 2 3,640 -

4 Ali Khan 4 3 1 47,690 45,800

5 Dhoian Khushki - - - - -

6 Shah Mohammad 1 1 0 5,762,400 5,762,400

7 Chechian - - - - -

8 Dhedhar - - - - -

9 Seria 7 6 1 134,565 131,160

10 Bandi Seria - - - - -

11 Mirpur - - - - -

12 Kot Najibullah 2 1 1 29,050 15,025

13 Ganja Kamala - - - - -

14 SaraiSaleh 4 3 1 11,320 8170

Total 29 21 8 6,483,760 6,358,410

44

Payment for Crops

Sr. No. Name of Mouza No. of DPs

paid

Compensation Amount

(Rs)

Disbursed Amount

(Rs)

1 Monan 27 101,530 33,636

2 Murad Abad 14 92,188 57,065

3 Derwesh 33 135,410 90,201

4 Ali Khan 48 162,360 102,764

5 Dhoian Khushki 85 508,200 441,425

6 Shah Mohammad 59 759,825 519,195

7 Chechian 17 80,300 55,000

8 Dhedhar 56 1,340,160 1,220,533

9 Seria 74 1,125,000 492,572

10 BandiSeria 19 81,510 32137

11 Mirpur 48 436,095 225,714

12 KotNajibullah 73 1,609,575 959,863

13 Ganja Kamala 59 478,650 308,963

14 SaraiSaleh 46 511,500 303,932

Total 658 7,422,303.00 4,843,000

Allowances (Vulnerable DP’s, affected structures DP’s & Labours)

Total No of DPs

No of DPs PAID

% of DPs PAID

Remaining DPs

Total Amount (Rs)

Amount Disbursed

(Rs.)

260 257 98.8% 3 19,490,000 19,370,000

45

Annexure – F Notification of GRC

46

Pictorial Presentation

Meeting With DPs & DPCs at Padara Package I

Meeting with DPs & DPCs at Mohri Package I

Meeting with DPs & DPCs at Kanwan Package I

47

Meeting with DPs & DPCs at Motian & Dingi Package I

Meeting with DPs & DPCs at Kot Najibullah Package II

Meeting with DPs & DPCs at Seria Package II

48

Meeting with DPs & DPCs at Mir Pur Package II

Meeting with DPs & DPCs at BandI Seria Package II